Bounty Managers Wearing Bitcoin Signature, Funny Irony

[randegibran]

I love with Hhmpuz bounty campaign distribution on date because their promise sent coin today and they have sent all without complaint any payment fees transaction, maybe if any other bounty campaign manager will give reason with eth gas fee but not for Hhmpuz bounty campaign, I like this bounty campaign manager can distribution on time.

[bitzizzix]

Nothing is to be argued here its the right of every people here to join what he wants even if his a bounty manager, admin, mods or any position they are holding as long as there's no conflict and no violated rules in this forum. 

Yes, it's funny to argue with it because a manager must already know and be an expert in his field what to do so as not to cause conflict.
The manager just does what is agreed beforehand and it's all for all of us who are here for us to get the job and don't have to talk about it because a manager is someone who better understands what to do for the job in his field.

[J1mb0]

The bounty manager is also the person hired to manage, they are not responsible for the success or failure of the project they manage. And the bounty manager is completely signed up for the project he wants, I think this is completely normal.

[sayaya17]

As long as it follows the rules, any member of the forum may here participate in any campaign, including the manager. Who does not want to follow the bitcoin payment signature campaign, if it enters the qualification surely most people also want to follow it, let alone bitcoin is bullish and the price is getting more expensive. This is an opportunity for anyone to get it, either from a signature campaign with bitcoin payments or by trading.

[Traderbtcc]

I don't know why you feel it's wrong, personally I can't find any thing wrong with that, cause the last time I checked it's not mandatory that they must wear the signature code of whatever project they are managing/promoting, also maybe the campaign manager is probably in need of money and bitcoin signature can get him/her the money since they will get payment weekly, unlike bounty where they have to wait till the token gets listed,no harm in that.

[ElaineGanda]

Well I don't see any problem with it because as fas as I know those bounty managers have the consent of their clients. Besides, a bounty manager has a lot of on going project that is why their signature and avatar will always vary depends on what they want to wear.

[Icologies]

Well I don't see any problem with it because as fas as I know those bounty managers have the consent of their clients. Besides, a bounty manager has a lot of on going project that is why their signature and avatar will always vary depends on what they want to wear.

I agree because one bounty manager can hold multiple bounties and it has no rules at all so there's nothing funny in this
I thought it was natural and maybe this problem already be resolved right Gift Managers Wearing Signatures another

[dunfida]

The irony of it is that they manage bounty but promote bitcoin paying signature. Lol

Its none of your business on what those managers do have in mind and come to think that it isnt necessary for them to wear off a bounty signature that theyve been managing.
Lets say they do manage 10 campaigns, it isnt really needed for them to wear off those signature alternately? thats pure nonsense.Also, the company that would hire
them wouldnt really be making it compulsory even if they do hire the manager doesnt mean that they should wear off sig.If those managers been wearing off
bitcoin paying campaigns then its their choice, its none of our business.

[Lordhermes]

I don't know why you feel it's wrong, personally I can't find any thing wrong with that, cause the last time I checked it's not mandatory that they must wear the signature code of whatever project they are managing/promoting, also maybe the campaign manager is probably in need of money and bitcoin signature can get him/her the money since they will get payment weekly, unlike bounty where they have to wait till the token gets listed,no harm in that.

What people don't understand is that, the bounty manager is never responsible for any project that fail at certain point in time, bounty manager work is generally to make sure the project is promoted to every corner and pays off the hunters when due, so if his interested in promoting multiple bounties at same time based on his time schedule for successful management, it's alright for him as well.

[ElmedoRator]

But whether this matter really matters or has any meaning in this space, it is your opinion that you do not like it, but I see no problem. What about BM? They're gods or whatever sublime you see them wearing another campaign signature is ironic, just do well what they have to do.

[aryana42]

But whether this matter really matters or has any meaning in this space, it is your opinion that you do not like it, but I see no problem. What about BM? They're gods or whatever sublime you see them wearing another campaign signature is ironic, just do well what they have to do.

Actually, this kind of thing does not need to be debated or questioned, because it is a personal right of someone, including a manager as well, because this does not only concern how good the project is, but also about the likes and beliefs of the projects he participates in, even though on average On average, the participants who took part in certain projects were due to the good projects and the large payouts, both in the form of BTC and in the form of an Altcoin project.

[acdc]

It's the manager prerogative to wear the signature they have been given the task too. Of course they will choose a more rewarding or satisfying compensation, this is a common sense I think. If you are a manager then you get a contract for handling campaign, usually you'll go for a regular signature that pays fiat or bitcoin.

Not saying his not supporting the project he handled but he is just commission to do the bounty service nothing more btt of course they make sure the project is legit so it wouldn't do bad record on their portfolio.

That's right, the bounty manager is also a bounty hunter and he can put an signature on someone who pays high salaries.
Projects that he manages are simply paid to do that, he has no responsibility to promote the project.

I agree, the bounty manager is not a member of the project, he is like a bounty hunter participating in some part of the bounty program.
If he has a reputable account it is not uncommon for him to use it to promote another project with higher salaries.

[dhemasm]

I don't think there's anything wrong with that, as long as the bounty manager doesn't have a contract that requires him not to promote other projects through his signature, while not the others by promoting Fraud Project I think it's their right to participate in the signature campaign they want.

[adzino]

I don't see any "irony" over here. The bounty managers aren't required to wear the signature of the program they are promoting. It's their signature space and they can do what they want with it. They get paid for maintaining the bounty program, not for wearing the signature. Or probably they aren't allowed to wear the bounty signature and join the program since they maybe able to manipulate their own data.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

[randegibran]

Often a bounty manager will manage many different projects at the same time.
Obviously he cannot use the signature for all projects at the same time, in which case he has the right to use the signature for the best project and pay the highest salary.

They have many project manage on the same time so its confused if using all signature campaign, but I think most worth if using his signature only like promoting about his manage campaign, not using other signature code on his account. Check with some bounty campaign manager not using signature code from other project.

[ElaineGanda]

Well I don't see any problem with it because as fas as I know those bounty managers have the consent of their clients. Besides, a bounty manager has a lot of on going project that is why their signature and avatar will always vary depends on what they want to wear.

I agree because one bounty manager can hold multiple bounties and it has no rules at all so there's nothing funny in this
I thought it was natural and maybe this problem already be resolved right Gift Managers Wearing Signatures another

Their cleint should not avoid them to use different signature because it is included on their contract. Besides the only job of bounty manager is to handle and manage a certain project. It is not their job to help the project to advertise or endorse the project.

[palle11]

I don't see any "irony" over here. The bounty managers aren't required to wear the signature of the program they are promoting. It's their signature space and they can do what they want with it. They get paid for maintaining the bounty program, not for wearing the signature. Or probably they aren't allowed to wear the bounty signature and join the program since they maybe able to manipulate their own data.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

One of the guys seating on the fence, funny again.

They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

This is contradicting yourself. And it means you are understanding my view.
Have you seen a signature campaign manager wearing bounty logo? But bounty managers wear signature logo. The point is they can clear up the bounty by bringing up bounties that pay with bnb, etheruem, litecoin, monero and many other high value altcoins.

[ultrloa]

I don't see any "irony" over here. The bounty managers aren't required to wear the signature of the program they are promoting. It's their signature space and they can do what they want with it. They get paid for maintaining the bounty program, not for wearing the signature. Or probably they aren't allowed to wear the bounty signature and join the program since they maybe able to manipulate their own data.
But yeah, that's funny. They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

One of the guys seating on the fence, funny again.

They know that those bounty program pays shit, and hence even if they have option to join them, they don't lol.

This is contradicting yourself. And it means you are understanding my view.
Have you seen a signature campaign manager wearing bounty logo? But bounty managers wear signature logo. The point is they can clear up the bounty by bringing up bounties that pay with bnb, etheruem, litecoin, monero and many other high value altcoins.

There's nothing to debate about this since signature campaign management job is focus to handle the campaign and give the weekly reports(counting the post made) to the owners and signatures space is not included in this package. If the owners want their manager to where their signature codes well that's another contract that needed to be discuss and the payment from it is separate from bounty campaign managing.

[Argoo]

I have also thought like this in the past, where a manager is following the Bitcoin campaign and at the same time he is promoting the Altcoin campaign, this is obviously funny and I myself have also thought that the campaign he manages will not be maximally successful, even though it is. makes me quip at this point, because what you say is absolutely true, because Bitcoin is king, so the campaign with Bitcoin payments is still the best than Altcoins.

I do not see anything bad or unusual in this. If payment for a subscription campaign is made in bitcoins, such a campaign usually lasts a very long time, sometimes for years, and there is a strictly limited number of participants. If you reset this signature, then you probably won't go back there.
I have also seen a similar situation several times. However, if the bounty campaign manager carries a fresh signature of a company that is paid with tokens, then this is really suspicious.

[guydin]

I agree that many Bounty are simply using investors to draw out money. There is no guarantee that you will receive the promised reward. Now people do not care about their decency and conscience, everyone wants one thing - to earn, and it does not matter in an honest way or by deception. When I hear about giveaways that promise big rewards, it makes me laugh. After a huge number of negative reviews, I'm generally surprised that someone else believes that it is really possible to make money on the Bounty. Better not to waste your time on this pointless activity.