Rollbit.com | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino 👑

[JohnBitCo]

Valid point but depositing a $10 and asking you to wager $100 this an obvious case that the house will win,guaranteed!

They should atleast say something that you must wager the full amount before you can withdraw or a 1.5X would save it's purpose from allowing people from cleaning their coins or exchanging them.

Regardless lose your first $100 and there after you are in

Why do you think that if gambler wager initially they will lose $100. If you are clever enough, you can play x-roulette with multiplier of only 1.01 and hopefully you won't lose any amount.

_______________________________________________________________________________ ___________________

I think we are discussing way too much for this 100$ wagering requirement. Its not that hard to achieve if you are a gambler. 

[Peanutswar]

Before start playing ive read mostly the rules and the FAQ of the different gambling platforms, I want to try on and I saw the withdrawal requirement of the rollbit. Also for other future players who would like to play too that they have this kind of rule for their users if you want to withdraw your funds. I don't have any problem with this because it's their own rule if you don't want to agree with it they cant do it's your choice.

https://i.imgur.com/kKAUfba.png

If you don't have any problem with that FAQ, why do you want to discuss it here
I don't know what your purpose is by opening a discussion about this FAQ. That's no big deal and the average Gamblers won't enough for playing with a $10 bankroll, didn't take long to make a $100 wager (if He's a real gambler)

I just want to share that they have this kind of rule mostly there are gamblers who didn't read mostly the FAQ of the platform we came with different gambling platforms that might adopt into another so they didn't get surprise they cant withdraw with their small amount deposit. Most of us here 100 USD is not a big deal so there's no problem with the minimum wage lol.

BTW is glad to see trading has opened

Good to see that they open their trading I would like to try this soon its looks like trade with only a small timeline but its hard to identify what is the next trend of the market without the assist of trend lines still need to check with the other market value

[roycilik]

~~

$100 is not big. You can not run spam deposit to attack casino with $10 or create multi accounts to try luck with initial $10. If you get a lucky big win, you withdraw from initial $10, it is unfair for the casino.

Wager the initial $10 ten times maximum to be able to withdraw is not a big deal. It is certainly that you need to have money after 10 bets to withdraw.

Or you can save your time by deposit $100 and make one or two bets. It's not a big deal at all for real gamblers.

Oh, thanks for the explanation
btw, do you also gamble on Rollbit? or just a commentator? it would be nice if you were a gambler at Rollbits, let's share your big win here (:
I'm a "Fake Gambler" (:

[newwest]

Valid point but depositing a $10 and asking you to wager $100 this an obvious case that the house will win,guaranteed!

They should atleast say something that you must wager the full amount before you can withdraw or a 1.5X would save it's purpose from allowing people from cleaning their coins or exchanging them.

Regardless lose your first $100 and there after you are in

Why do you think that if gambler wager initially they will lose $100. If you are clever enough, you can play x-roulette with multiplier of only 1.01 and hopefully you won't lose any amount.

_______________________________________________________________________________ ___________________

I think we are discussing way too much for this 100$ wagering requirement. Its not that hard to achieve if you are a gambler. 

I have played and seen some sites where you you bet against the minimum requirement with minimum like 1.01 etc and seen back to back red, which is like a least that should happen. You wager the 99th times right and just 1 loss and you lose everything in the end. So concern of people are genuine and will exists and might be away when it does not meet their requirement.

[Eureka_07]

If you are so concern about this $100 minimum requirement, you can earn it in the fastest, and probably one of the safest way, is through playing slots. Normal spins will take some time, but if you bought a feature, it is much quicker and will save you some time (if you're really worried about that). It is enjoying IMO, just always expect for the worst if you plan to play with money.

[babygun]

If you are so concern about this $100 minimim requirement, you can earn it in the fastest, and probably one of the safest way, is through playing slots. Normal spins will take some time, but if you bought a feature, it is much quicker and will save you some time (if you're really worried about that). It is enjoying IMO, just always expect for the worst if you plan to play with money.

It is probably the fastest (and must fun way to wager) but also the most risky. Play 100 spins of 1$ on a high volatile slot and with a bad session, you can have 90% of dead spins. Same with a bonus buy feature.
While I can understand that some sites have a wagering requirement when you deposit some amount, there are still a lot of sites that don't have this requirement.

[panjul07]

If you are so concern about this $100 minimim requirement, you can earn it in the fastest, and probably one of the safest way, is through playing slots. Normal spins will take some time, but if you bought a feature, it is much quicker and will save you some time (if you're really worried about that). It is enjoying IMO, just always expect for the worst if you plan to play with money.

Seems that the main concern from the first poster who start this discussion is about wagering 10x of the deposit.
Since the min deposit is $10 and minimum wagering requirement is $100, so perhaps it looks a bit too hard for him.
It is indeed a bit hard to wager 10x of our initial deposit but it is not that hard to wager $100 if we make bigger deposit.
But I cant agree if buy feature is one of the safest way to do as you may get nothing from buy feature and you may get bad losing streak with buy feature.
Buy feature is probably the fastest way but it is not the safest way obviously.
IMO the safest way to wager is to choose a game with lower house edge than slots.

[crzy]

If you are so concern about this $100 minimim requirement, you can earn it in the fastest, and probably one of the safest way, is through playing slots. Normal spins will take some time, but if you bought a feature, it is much quicker and will save you some time (if you're really worried about that). It is enjoying IMO, just always expect for the worst if you plan to play with money.

Spending $100 is just a small money for a gambler seriously, and most of the time this kind of amount is not enough for them to have fun, I'm telling you even a small time gambler will spend $100 on casinos, so I realized that this is so easy to achieve and if you really think that requirement is too much, then go for other site because no one can help you on this one, this is already the requirement since then and Rollbit still doing great despite of this.

[Eureka_07]

If you are so concern about this $100 minimim requirement, you can earn it in the fastest, and probably one of the safest way, is through playing slots. Normal spins will take some time, but if you bought a feature, it is much quicker and will save you some time (if you're really worried about that). It is enjoying IMO, just always expect for the worst if you plan to play with money.

Seems that the main concern from the first poster who start this discussion is about wagering 10x of the deposit.
Since the min deposit is $10 and minimum wagering requirement is $100, so perhaps it looks a bit too hard for him.
It is indeed a bit hard to wager 10x of our initial deposit but it is not that hard to wager $100 if we make bigger deposit.
But I cant agree if buy feature is one of the safest way to do as you may get nothing from buy feature and you may get bad losing streak with buy feature.
Buy feature is probably the fastest way but it is not the safest way obviously.
IMO the safest way to wager is to choose a game with lower house edge than slots.

Oh, so it's 10x wagering requirement for each deposit? Honestly this is my first time encountering such requirement to be able to process a withdrawal... I thought it was only $100-fixed. It wont be easy especially for small gamblers to do, but it is not very hard. However, I really don't get it why they require it since it isn't a welcome bonus or a deposit bonus, or what.

Still, for me, buying features is the safest.

[Haunebu]

Oh, so it's 10x wagering requirement for each deposit? Honestly this is my first time encountering such requirement to be able to process a withdrawal... I thought it was only $100-fixed. It wont be easy especially for small gamblers to do, but it is not very hard. However, I really don't get it why they require it since it isn't a welcome bonus or a deposit bonus, or what.

Absolutely wrong. You misunderstood just like several other posters. Check this out.

https://rollbit.com/faq

They clearly specified that only new accounts need to deposit $10 and wager $100 before they can withdraw. I believe this is a one time thing only for new accounts basically.

[roycilik]

Oh, so it's 10x wagering requirement for each deposit? Honestly this is my first time encountering such requirement to be able to process a withdrawal... I thought it was only $100-fixed. It wont be easy especially for small gamblers to do, but it is not very hard. However, I really don't get it why they require it since it isn't a welcome bonus or a deposit bonus, or what.

Still, for me, buying features is the safest.

No no no it's not a 10x wagering, but a fixed amount of $ 100 and only once time
that's only Panjul assumption, that would be difficult if the requirement is 10x from the initial deposit (especially with deposits of more than $1000)

[UserU]

While the $100 wager requirement is a little too steep (compared to other casinos that enforce like 100 - 200% wager requirements), it could still be achievable if low multipliers on Crash are allowed.

Still, a possible hindrance for those YOLO bettors.

[panjul07]

Oh, so it's 10x wagering requirement for each deposit? Honestly this is my first time encountering such requirement to be able to process a withdrawal... I thought it was only $100-fixed. It wont be easy especially for small gamblers to do, but it is not very hard. However, I really don't get it why they require it since it isn't a welcome bonus or a deposit bonus, or what.

Still, for me, buying features is the safest.

No no no it's not a 10x wagering, but a fixed amount of $ 100 and only once time
that's only Panjul assumption, that would be difficult if the requirement is 10x from the initial deposit (especially with deposits of more than $1000)

Yes it is my assumption because it seems that the first poster and some other users who think that it is hard because they look at how to wager $100 with $10 deposit only which is the same as 10x wager of the deposit.
Probably I need to revise few part of my previous post so no one will be confused with my assumption. 

It is indeed a bit hard to wager 10x of our initial deposit $100 with $10 deposit but it is not that hard to wager $100 if we make bigger deposit.

[Eureka_07]

Oww, my bad. Big thanks for clearing that one out.
If that's the case, a hundred-dollar minimun requirement isnt that hard to get especially if the user will play to Rolllbit, I think they required it to fight multi-accounts? Somehow?
Tip from not so good player... another good option if you're targeting the minimum wagering requirement without losing that much is to place bets on roulette.

Absolutely wrong. You misunderstood just like several other posters. Check this out.

No no no it's not a 10x wagering, but a fixed amount of $ 100 and only once time
that's only Panjul assumption, that would be difficult if the requirement is 10x from the initial deposit (especially with deposits of more than $1000)

Yes it is my assumption because it seems that the first poster and some other users who think that it is hard because they look at how to wager $100 with $10 deposit only which is the same as 10x wager of the deposit.
Probably I need to revise few part of my previous post so no one will be confused with my assumption.  

[Haunebu]

If that's the case, a hundred-dollar minimun requirement isnt that hard to get especially if the user will play to Rolllbit, I think they required it to fight multi-accounts? Somehow?

They probably implemented these rules to primarily battle multi-account scammers and money launderers which are common issues these days in the crypto world.

Tip from not so good player... another good option if you're targeting the minimum wagering requirement without losing that much is to place bets on roulette.

Instead of roulette, the better options are 1.01 odds betting in Dice and betting on both the banker and player in Baccarat which keep your losses minimal majority of the time.

[onecall123]

If that's the case, a hundred-dollar minimun requirement isnt that hard to get especially if the user will play to Rolllbit, I think they required it to fight multi-accounts? Somehow?

They probably implemented these rules to primarily battle multi-account scammers and money launderers which are common issues these days in the crypto world.

Suppose you open a Casino platform, so your consideration should be put on every single of clients. You have to be user-friendly as well to get close to your client. Since, there lots of choices out there and one simple rule may redirect your customer to another platform. What I believe, minimum $100 deposit requirement could be lowered.

[Yogee]

This discussion on wagering requirement for new accounts has gone far too long hehe. I bet Rollbit has already taken into consideration that some "fly by" users may not like it but they're not too concerned with that so they still placed it in the terms. Who needs those kinds of customers anyway? A $100 would not be hard to achieve and any regular player would agree to that.

[UserU]

This discussion on wagering requirement for new accounts has gone far too long hehe. I bet Rollbit has already taken into consideration that some "fly by" users may not like it but they're not too concerned with that so they still placed it in the terms. Who needs those kinds of customers anyway? A $100 would not be hard to achieve and any regular player would agree to that.

At least the official representative should address this to end it once and for all.

While most of us should have no qualms with the standard 100 - 200% wagering requirements, 1000% is a little too steep especially for newbies planning to try the casino. And that when it applies to both skins and crypto.

[Haunebu]

What I believe, minimum $100 deposit requirement could be lowered.

Did you read the previous posts? Minimum deposit is $10 while wagering requirement is $100. So much misinformation is being spread here and I am surprised to see that the Rollbit representative hasn't addressed this properly yet.

While most of us should have no qualms with the standard 100 - 200% wagering requirements, 1000% is a little too steep especially for newbies planning to try the casino. And that when it applies to both skins and crypto.

So many people here got the wrong idea regarding the deposit and wagering requirements. Read the FAQ and the earliest posts thoroughly people.

[Eureka_07]

If you are so concern about this $100 minimim requirement, you can earn it in the fastest, and probably one of the safest way, is through playing slots. Normal spins will take some time, but if you bought a feature, it is much quicker and will save you some time (if you're really worried about that). It is enjoying IMO, just always expect for the worst if you plan to play with money.

It is probably the fastest (and must fun way to wager) but also the most risky. Play 100 spins of 1$ on a high volatile slot and with a bad session, you can have 90% of dead spins. Same with a bonus buy feature.
While I can understand that some sites have a wagering requirement when you deposit some amount, there are still a lot of sites that don't have this requirement.

Playing a $1 per spin with a bankroll of $100 is quite risky. However I don't think 90% of that 100 spins will be dead or even 50%. In my experience, sometimes in 100 spins with $1 stake, you might get approx 70-90% of your bankroll if your spins aren't that bad nor good. Moreover, it is really different when it comes to buy features