🔥 Crypto-Gambling.Net 🔥 Crypto Casino Reviews By A Real Insider ✅

[nakamura12]

Yeah, but then I'm suddenly controlling what people can say. Sure, it'll work to some extent, but still not perfect.

Well, you can compare it to your own review if you are looking to have different result of review of the same gambling site. I'm sure you know that every gambler have their own taste of gambling platform. Some want a gambling site that have low house edge, possible lowest withdrawal fee and wide variety of cryptocurrency accepted as payment.

[Lanatsa]

Yeah, but then I'm suddenly controlling what people can say. Sure, it'll work to some extent, but still not perfect.

Well, you can compare it to your own review if you are looking to have different result of review of the same gambling site. I'm sure you know that every gambler have their own taste of gambling platform. Some want a gambling site that have low house edge, possible lowest withdrawal fee and wide variety of cryptocurrency accepted as payment.

Factors to determine;

-Fees
-HE
-UI/UX
-Support
-Perks and bonuses

Its true that each gambler do have its own taste and perception on site.This is why personal judgement will really be different to each other

but well these kind of effort are still appreciated. @OP, would you have some time to review Rollbit.com?

[DNL]

Yeah, but then I'm suddenly controlling what people can say. Sure, it'll work to some extent, but still not perfect.

Well, you can compare it to your own review if you are looking to have different result of review of the same gambling site. I'm sure you know that every gambler have their own taste of gambling platform. Some want a gambling site that have low house edge, possible lowest withdrawal fee and wide variety of cryptocurrency accepted as payment.

Factors to determine;

-Fees
-HE
-UI/UX
-Support
-Perks and bonuses

Its true that each gambler do have its own taste and perception on site.This is why personal judgement will really be different to each other

but well these kind of effort are still appreciated. @OP, would you have some time to review Rollbit.com?

Yeah. Rollbit is on the list to get reviewed.

[GamblingSiteFinder]

And I am not sure what you mean by good examples. The GamblingSiteFinder one doesn't even have rankings based on reviews. The rankings on the front page are manually picked and seem to be based on who's paying the most. That doesn't seem very transparent. - Their reviews themselves look good though.

Firstly, thank you very much for taking the time to visit and critique my site. Good or bad, I appreciate the honesty from your first impressions on my site. I know every website owner says that they don't take affiliate commissions into consideration when conducting reviews, but there are some additional things I do to try and be more transparent.

For starters, the obvious is that some of my highest ranked sites don't even have affiliate programs eg. Bustabit and Bustadice.

Next, while all of my outbound links are cloaked, if you click through them you'll see that many aren't even affiliate links. This is most noticeable/impactful in the Poker category (particularly the sites in the top 5), but this is also true about the Software, Exchange, Forex, DFS, and Training categories as well.

Lastly, if you go to my site's changelog you'll see which reviews are monetized. Almost every review is in fact monetized, but I do at least try to be upfront about that. In the future I plan to put disclosures within the review pages themselves.

I don't think user votes are particularly useful, as most users aren't familiar with the industry to give informed votes. And you'll just get some dodgy casino that incentivizes users to vote on your site, and skew things for ever.  But it could definitely be nice to have as a "editors rating" and "players rating" perhaps.

This exactly. Right now my site allows players to leave a star rating between 1-5, but having both and allowing visitors to see the discrepancy between the editor and the player pool is a much better method.

And to your point about dodgy casinos incentivizing users to cast votes, this is entirely true. I've already had two online gambling sites (both of which are no longer listed) do exactly what you said - give thousands of 1-star ratings to each of their competitors and 5-star ratings to themselves.

According to their webpage, it's more or less in exchange for a backlink. But even if it was for cash, I don't really think that's problematic as long as they're not changing the reviews/score based on it. (Of course we don't know that for certain...

But that's really the thing. If you receive money(Or even just a good backlink for that matter) from a site in exchange for something that may be meaningless in itself, you do also have greater incentive to intentionally or unintentionally for that matter manipulate the scores in their favor. It only really have to be marginals to actually make a difference there.

I guess there is no way for me to prove that I don't accept money in exchange for better rankings aside from just taking my word for it. But regarding the backlink, we actually request that it be a "No Follow" link, which holds far less value [if any at all] than a "Do Follow" link. IMHO, that was the most fair and honest way.

This is all a meaningless discussion though because to date there hasn't been a single site that has reached out to me about regarding the Trusted Partner program. 

I'm sorry for coming into your thread and turning the discussion towards my site. I just went and checked out Crypto-Gambling.net and it looks like you're off to an excellent start. I wish you the best of luck, and if you'd ever like to chat hit me up!

[DNL]

And I am not sure what you mean by good examples. The GamblingSiteFinder one doesn't even have rankings based on reviews. The rankings on the front page are manually picked and seem to be based on who's paying the most. That doesn't seem very transparent. - Their reviews themselves look good though.

Firstly, thank you very much for taking the time to visit and critique my site. Good or bad, I appreciate the honesty from your first impressions on my site. I know every website owner says that they don't take affiliate commissions into consideration when conducting reviews, but there are some additional things I do to try and be more transparent.

For starters, the obvious is that some of my highest ranked sites don't even have affiliate programs eg. Bustabit and Bustadice.

Next, while all of my outbound links are cloaked, if you click through them you'll see that many aren't even affiliate links. This is most noticeable/impactful in the Poker category (particularly the sites in the top 5), but this is also true about the Software, Exchange, Forex, DFS, and Training categories as well.

Lastly, if you go to my site's changelog you'll see which reviews are monetized. Almost every review is in fact monetized, but I do at least try to be upfront about that. In the future I plan to put disclosures within the review pages themselves.

I don't think user votes are particularly useful, as most users aren't familiar with the industry to give informed votes. And you'll just get some dodgy casino that incentivizes users to vote on your site, and skew things for ever.  But it could definitely be nice to have as a "editors rating" and "players rating" perhaps.

This exactly. Right now my site allows players to leave a star rating between 1-5, but having both and allowing visitors to see the discrepancy between the editor and the player pool is a much better method.

And to your point about dodgy casinos incentivizing users to cast votes, this is entirely true. I've already had two online gambling sites (both of which are no longer listed) do exactly what you said - give thousands of 1-star ratings to each of their competitors and 5-star ratings to themselves.

According to their webpage, it's more or less in exchange for a backlink. But even if it was for cash, I don't really think that's problematic as long as they're not changing the reviews/score based on it. (Of course we don't know that for certain...

But that's really the thing. If you receive money(Or even just a good backlink for that matter) from a site in exchange for something that may be meaningless in itself, you do also have greater incentive to intentionally or unintentionally for that matter manipulate the scores in their favor. It only really have to be marginals to actually make a difference there.

I guess there is no way for me to prove that I don't accept money in exchange for better rankings aside from just taking my word for it. But regarding the backlink, we actually request that it be a "No Follow" link, which holds far less value [if any at all] than a "Do Follow" link. IMHO, that was the most fair and honest way.

This is all a meaningless discussion though because to date there hasn't been a single site that has reached out to me about regarding the Trusted Partner program.  

I'm sorry for coming into your thread and turning the discussion towards my site. I just went and checked out Crypto-Gambling.net and it looks like you're off to an excellent start. I wish you the best of luck, and if you'd ever like to chat hit me up!

No worries, I didn't really mean to criticize you either.
It was more the point that there is not much of a difference between our sites, so I felt a bit unfair called out there.

Glad to hear that you have been taking action against manipulation though. Sounds like you know what you're doing

[DNL]

I expect at least 5 new reviews to be released this month - Hopefully more

[DNL]

Just launched a brand new Rollbit review

[DNL]

Which review would you guys like to see next?
I'm currently working on a crypto.games review.

[zanezane]

~

Guess it could be a fun project. I'll put some thought into it and work on it. It would probably have to be a separate project though.

Hopefully you find it really fun to do this because some of my friends that works in the IT sector don't find it amusing to work on a project. Why would you separate the project though? Will it be easier to do so than integrating it in the website?

[DNL]

~

Guess it could be a fun project. I'll put some thought into it and work on it. It would probably have to be a separate project though.

Hopefully you find it really fun to do this because some of my friends that works in the IT sector don't find it amusing to work on a project. Why would you separate the project though? Will it be easier to do so than integrating it in the website?

Well yes, but I also feel like the concepts work better separately than combined.

[LUCKMCFLY]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

[DNL]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

[aysg76]

Just launched a brand new Rollbit review

You should have also mentioned about their trading gambling game on which you have to hit up or high and bust price which is really a new addition to crypto casinos and players have really liked that and you should have increased the rating for that events they are organizing at regular intervals.They are becoming quite popular at moment and developing new games and improving interface for user experience.Try to get in detail for every casino you are reviewing.

[DNL]

Just launched a brand new Rollbit review

You should have also mentioned about their trading gambling game on which you have to hit up or high and bust price which is really a new addition to crypto casinos and players have really liked that and you should have increased the rating for that events they are organizing at regular intervals.They are becoming quite popular at moment and developing new games and improving interface for user experience.Try to get in detail for every casino you are reviewing.

I am mentioning it several times. The only unique thing about it is really the fact that you can do 1000x leverage on some coins. Let's see how long they can keep it up, I think there is a very good reason why real trading platforms had to stop offering 1000x leverage after a very short bit.

[DNL]

Currently working on Thunderpick review, any other requests?

[LUCKMCFLY]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

[worle1bm]

Factors to determine;

-Fees
-HE
-UI/UX
-Support
-Perks and bonuses

Although you have mentioned most of the points that you should look for while playing or reviewing any casino but I would also like to add some more to your list:

- Cryptocurrencies accepted as deposit
- Types of games they are offering like slot games,sportsbook
- Security like 2FA enabled or not
-KYC related issues

So they all jointly make a legit casino and players trust over that particular casino.Rest it all depends on you what you are looking for.

[DNL]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

Fair point.
Generally speaking, I will say that trustworthy casinos will still pay out winnings from people that use VPNs, but it can of course be a tough one to guess on.
I have directly heard Stake saying in their advertisement that they allow people to use VPNs, which is pretty contradicting to their license, but I guess it does make them a safe place for people from restricted countries(Especially the U.S., France and the Netherlands that are usually blocked elsewhere).

[DNL]

Factors to determine;

-Fees
-HE
-UI/UX
-Support
-Perks and bonuses

Although you have mentioned most of the points that you should look for while playing or reviewing any casino but I would also like to add some more to your list:

- Cryptocurrencies accepted as deposit
- Types of games they are offering like slot games,sportsbook
- Security like 2FA enabled or not
-KYC related issues

So they all jointly make a legit casino and players trust over that particular casino.Rest it all depends on you what you are looking for.

I generally list most of these.
I could go into details about the KYC related issues, but the main issue there is that there is a big difference between the KYC rules in the ToS and the actual KYC that is being enforced currently, which is subject to change at any point as well.

[LUCKMCFLY]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

Fair point.
Generally speaking, I will say that trustworthy casinos will still pay out winnings from people that use VPNs, but it can of course be a tough one to guess on.
I have directly heard Stake saying in their advertisement that they allow people to use VPNs, which is pretty contradicting to their license, but I guess it does make them a safe place for people from restricted countries(Especially the U.S., France and the Netherlands that are usually blocked elsewhere).

Well, in fact, one of the things that I like about stake.com is that they understand global situations in terms of prohibitions, may have originally lived in a non-prohibited country, but may have arisen the action that has moved to live in A prohibited country, which is a unfortunate but possible fact (hypothetical case), there I think it is a discussion that is an ancient customer, but now it is in those conditions, which is a case that can enter as "special" . Similarly, these criteria that you consider are excellent because you speak that the analysis you do is deep and from there a review is well reliable.