🔥 Crypto-Gambling.Net 🔥 Crypto Casino Reviews By A Real Insider ✅

[DNL]

According to how I see the ratings in OP they are not bad at all, really the sites you have are excellent, I want to know something, for the selection of casinos what criteria do you take into account? I imagine that apart from the reputation also the history? I mean, the age of the casino.

There are a number of casinos that are relatively young, some are nascent, but have built a great community and give a lot to talk about, I think you can imagine what casinos can be, in fact in the forum they have a lot of good Ann in the game area of chance. I have seen reviews of other sites and if they have any divergence, but they are small, some take it as very significant, but in the end I think that to give a final verdict they take into account the age.

Well, generally speaking, I wanna have as many sites listed as possible.
In terms of the ratings themselves, I generally judge on as many factors as possible.

I understand, as I have seen in the forum some sites that are also dedicated to making this type of reviews, how is it different from the others? Some are quite radical in what they think and some users do not have any kind of tact to say things, in fact some are quite strong.

If I have the professional opinion that you establish and if I compare it with another site, why should I trust yours more than that of direct competition? I know that some factors to consider should have an impact on its availability for all countries, although the licenses give more confidence to the sites to the players, they can leave out many that really show talent.

What I hope to do eventually is offer way more information than other sites. Currently, I think I am on-pair or slightly above, but it can still get improved.
Another thing would be mentioning stuff that normal gamblers may not know.

I don't consider availability a real factor in reviews. All restricted countries is mentioned on the reviews, but it shouldn't affect the actual rank. You can easily get restricted from a bunch of countries just by getting a Curacao license and a few payment processors.

I think that at the time of making a review, the fact of those casinos that does not give access to players from prohibited countries should also weigh a lot, in that case what factors influence? Because since players from prohibited countries are more hungry to play and win, and they look for a way to enter through VPN, in addition, players who enter with VPN can have a lot of risk when withdrawing their winnings, since casinos they can demand KYC and problems can form, in fact cases of that style have already occurred and it causes some sites to be compromised even because of their reputation.

Fair point.
Generally speaking, I will say that trustworthy casinos will still pay out winnings from people that use VPNs, but it can of course be a tough one to guess on.
I have directly heard Stake saying in their advertisement that they allow people to use VPNs, which is pretty contradicting to their license, but I guess it does make them a safe place for people from restricted countries(Especially the U.S., France and the Netherlands that are usually blocked elsewhere).

Well, in fact, one of the things that I like about stake.com is that they understand global situations in terms of prohibitions, may have originally lived in a non-prohibited country, but may have arisen the action that has moved to live in A prohibited country, which is a unfortunate but possible fact (hypothetical case), there I think it is a discussion that is an ancient customer, but now it is in those conditions, which is a case that can enter as "special" . Similarly, these criteria that you consider are excellent because you speak that the analysis you do is deep and from there a review is well reliable.

I mean. Legally speaking, it is the country of which you reside, so there is not much of special cases there.

[DNL]

New wolf.bet review has been launched
https://crypto-gambling.net/casino/wolf-bet/

[Mahdirakib]

New wolf.bet review has been launched ~

Short review with some wrong information! They have only 3 games (dice, hilo, limbo) which are operated by themselves. But you said “they have a lot of....”. Moreover, in essential details you said that



But in reality they don't have any live, slots or video poker game yet. You haven't provided some important information as well. Aa example: Setting 2FA is mandatory for making withdrawals from wolf.bet. I think it should be in the essential details. Hope you will give a deeper look into the casino and update everything correctly.

[DNL]

New wolf.bet review has been launched ~

Short review with some wrong information! They have only 3 games (dice, hilo, limbo) which are operated by themselves. But you said “they have a lot of....”. Moreover, in essential details you said that



But in reality they don't have any live, slots or video poker game yet. You haven't provided some important information as well. Aa example: Setting 2FA is mandatory for making withdrawals from wolf.bet. I think it should be in the essential details. Hope you will give a deeper look into the casino and update everything correctly.

Ah yeah. I fixed that line. I had written a lot more about slots and live games before I realized they didn't have such offerings.
They do have 4 games now though. They launched sportsbetting a few weeks ago.

I think most casinos have the requirement of setting up 2FA as well. I don't really consider it important info. 2FA is a standard all over the internet these days, especially in the crypto field.

[LUCKMCFLY]

New wolf.bet review has been launched
https://crypto-gambling.net/casino/wolf-bet/

Thank you very much for the update, Wolfbet, they have a great reputation and the fact that they have released new games like Limbo is excellent, DICE is a scenario that I had not considered for this casino, but nevertheless I understand that Wolfbet want to implement it because of their history. throughout the gambling.
For me DICE represents one of the traditional games with the highest rate of player demand, in fact with that game I got to know the crypto world, first with Freebitco.in, and then with Stake.com, then already many casinos, I have not been active on Wolfbet, but it's about time to do it, again thanks for the update.

[DNL]

New wolf.bet review has been launched
https://crypto-gambling.net/casino/wolf-bet/

Thank you very much for the update, Wolfbet, they have a great reputation and the fact that they have released new games like Limbo is excellent, DICE is a scenario that I had not considered for this casino, but nevertheless I understand that Wolfbet want to implement it because of their history. throughout the gambling.
For me DICE represents one of the traditional games with the highest rate of player demand, in fact with that game I got to know the crypto world, first with Freebitco.in, and then with Stake.com, then already many casinos, I have not been active on Wolfbet, but it's about time to do it, again thanks for the update.

No problem. I'm glad to hear that you like it

[Mahdirakib]

They do have 4 games now though. They launched sportsbetting a few weeks ago.
I think most casinos have the requirement of setting up 2FA as well. I don't really consider it important info. 2FA is a standard all over the internet these days, especially in the crypto field.

Sports betting is different than the casino games. And without sports betting they have 3 casino games only. “Wide variety of game modes” isn't a suitable statement for having only three games. You should include it in Pros when wolf.bet will add more casino game or slots game at their platform.

You are right, every casino have 2FA option available for their user. But there is difference between having it as optional and mandatory. I have played at so many crypto casino but never seen any other casino where 2FA is mandatory like wolf.bet.

[DNL]

They do have 4 games now though. They launched sportsbetting a few weeks ago.
I think most casinos have the requirement of setting up 2FA as well. I don't really consider it important info. 2FA is a standard all over the internet these days, especially in the crypto field.

Sports betting is different than the casino games. And without sports betting they have 3 casino games only. “Wide variety of game modes” isn't a suitable statement for having only three games. You should include it in Pros when wolf.bet will add more casino game or slots game at their platform.

You are right, every casino have 2FA option available for their user. But there is difference between having it as optional and mandatory. I have played at so many crypto casino but never seen any other casino where 2FA is mandatory like wolf.bet.

I mean, sure. I guess wide variety may have been an over statement in here.

And it is more common these days. It's a requirement on at least a couple of the other sites that are also on the list.

[barbara44]

You're accusing me of not including bustabit/bustadice just because they don't offer an affiliate program.

There's no problem in not reviewing a site if they don't have an affiliate program in place, but what RHavar said is exactly why only the affiliated websites are mentioned. You should acknowledge the fact and there's no problem with not reviewing or listing sites you don't want to.

I don't understand what you mean by the "Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year?" - Which casinos are you referring to here?

He said that in response to this "One of the core principles of the site is that I will never review a site, that I have actively worked for within the past year. I think that's the only fair thing to do in my position."

This statement does sound like you have worked for various casinos and hence you don't want to review them yourself.

One interesting thing I saw on your website is that you have mentioned in cons of sites as follows

Stake - We lack to find one.
7bit casino - We lack to find one.
Winz - They don’t accept players from the United Kingdom and United States

If you have any knowledge about stake, they don't accept players from USA as well so either mention the same cons for each casino or just don't mention it for any of them.

I like you have reviewed sites in details but please avoid these small mistakes.

[DNL]

You're accusing me of not including bustabit/bustadice just because they don't offer an affiliate program.

There's no problem in not reviewing a site if they don't have an affiliate program in place, but what RHavar said is exactly why only the affiliated websites are mentioned. You should acknowledge the fact and there's no problem with not reviewing or listing sites you don't want to.

I don't understand what you mean by the "Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year?" - Which casinos are you referring to here?

He said that in response to this "One of the core principles of the site is that I will never review a site, that I have actively worked for within the past year. I think that's the only fair thing to do in my position."

This statement does sound like you have worked for various casinos and hence you don't want to review them yourself.

One interesting thing I saw on your website is that you have mentioned in cons of sites as follows

Stake - We lack to find one.
7bit casino - We lack to find one.
Winz - They don’t accept players from the United Kingdom and United States

If you have any knowledge about stake, they don't accept players from USA as well so either mention the same cons for each casino or just don't mention it for any of them.

I like you have reviewed sites in details but please avoid these small mistakes.

Sure, but I don't mind reviewing them, I also wanna review them truthfully on the same level as all the others.
They're still working in progress though. The priority is getting ones with affiliate done, and then proceed to work on the others.

I'm trying to keep them as updated as possible. There have been a few mistakes like that, but it's impossible to avoid and easier to fix when you come along them. I've updated the Winz one to reflect the others, since all restricted countries is already listed elsewhere in the review.

[DNL]

Thunderpick review up now as well!

[LimLims]

Thunderpick review up now as well!

It’s great to see someone like us personally visit the us and make a down to earth reviews.
It helps us to understand the site from a gambler prospective of view.
I am also glad to see already many popular sites/casinos reviews are already present.
But what i was really wondering about this Thunderpick site. Are they new one? Do they have any ANN thread here?
I personally don’t like playing on sites that doesn’t have a representative here in the forum.
Still will go through your review.

[DNL]

Thunderpick review up now as well!

It’s great to see someone like us personally visit the us and make a down to earth reviews.
It helps us to understand the site from a gambler prospective of view.
I am also glad to see already many popular sites/casinos reviews are already present.
But what i was really wondering about this Thunderpick site. Are they new one? Do they have any ANN thread here?
I personally don’t like playing on sites that doesn’t have a representative here in the forum.
Still will go through your review.

Not sure if they have a thread on here, but they're one of the early crypto sportsbooks. They launched in early 2017.
I remember them because one of my friends hit a 1000x bet slip with 1 EUR just when they launched.

[tygeade]

I actually like the detailed reviews and the website overall .

I have a question though.. since you haven't listed any cons about bitcasino, is there a reason why you have given them a 4.0 rating while other casinos like stake where you could not find a problem were given 5.0 rating.

I like the articles on the site like what is tether and all those articles, and from an SEO point of view, it will retain the viewers for a longer time if you keep adding more content regularly.

[Kakmakr]

I have read through some of the reviews of the sites where I play ...and I can see that you did your research and you know your trade. I am looking forward to the "insider" information section, because I am very interested on how sites like these work.

Some things I would like you to add to that section is detailed information on how online casinos partner with third party providers. (How much does it cost to host 3rd party games and who is paying the casino when people win huge Jackpots?   -- Money goes from 3rd party to casino and then to the player or does the casino cover all wins from their profits?)

Thank you for some very good reviews. 

[DNL]

I actually like the detailed reviews and the website overall .

I have a question though.. since you haven't listed any cons about bitcasino, is there a reason why you have given them a 4.0 rating while other casinos like stake where you could not find a problem were given 5.0 rating.

I like the articles on the site like what is tether and all those articles, and from an SEO point of view, it will retain the viewers for a longer time if you keep adding more content regularly.

Bitcasino was one of the first casinos added, so I still had a bit to learn regarding the cons and pros I wanted to add. They will be revisited soon to keep it up to date with the other ones.

I have read through some of the reviews of the sites where I play ...and I can see that you did your research and you know your trade. I am looking forward to the "insider" information section, because I am very interested on how sites like these work.

Some things I would like you to add to that section is detailed information on how online casinos partner with third party providers. (How much does it cost to host 3rd party games and who is paying the casino when people win huge Jackpots?   -- Money goes from 3rd party to casino and then to the player or does the casino cover all wins from their profits?)

Thank you for some very good reviews. 

Good idea. To me, it's some rather basic questions, but I can understand how curious normal players are in these cases. I'm still not certain how I wanna do the insider section though - But soon™️

[wiss19]

Hey DNL,

I like your services as it helps me to choose my new gambling places but I am seeing you did not add any new houses since June. Please review duelbits and chips.gg if your time permits.

Thank you.

[UserU]

Hey DNL,

You might want to shift the table of contents from the bottom to the top of the page.

It allows viewers to navigate between posts rather than having to scroll all the way down.

[delfastTions]

You are right, every casino have 2FA option available for their user. But there is difference between having it as optional and mandatory. I have played at so many crypto casino but never seen any other casino where 2FA is mandatory like wolf.bet.

I will not undertake to judge those who like registration with 2fa.  Personally, I do not like it at all because you are assured that this is a guarantee of security when entering the site in your wallet or when making an expense transaction?  
I am simply annoyed by this stupid procedure for writing a six-digit number from Google authentication, especially when you are forced to do it quickly, quickly by their time counter in the form of a blue circle.  All this is inconvenient and seems to become outdated in those days when both fingerprints and face recognition are already used everywhere.

[DNL]

Hey DNL,

I like your services as it helps me to choose my new gambling places but I am seeing you did not add any new houses since June. Please review duelbits and chips.gg if your time permits.

Thank you.

I got a whole bunch of work on my plate in regards to other projects, unfortunately, but hopefully, I'll be able to add a bunch of casinos on the site again soon. Duelbits and Chips.gg is def. going to get added, although I don't like chips.gg that much after they recently only paid out $250 to the guy that found an infinite money exploit.

Hey DNL,

You might want to shift the table of contents from the bottom to the top of the page.

It allows viewers to navigate between posts rather than having to scroll all the way down.

Yeah true. I didn't think people actually used it. I only added it for SEO purposes at first.

You are right, every casino have 2FA option available for their user. But there is difference between having it as optional and mandatory. I have played at so many crypto casino but never seen any other casino where 2FA is mandatory like wolf.bet.

I will not undertake to judge those who like registration with 2fa.  Personally, I do not like it at all because you are assured that this is a guarantee of security when entering the site in your wallet or when making an expense transaction?  
I am simply annoyed by this stupid procedure for writing a six-digit number from Google authentication, especially when you are forced to do it quickly, quickly by their time counter in the form of a blue circle.  All this is inconvenient and seems to become outdated in those days when both fingerprints and face recognition are already used everywhere.

Fingerprints and face recognition are not really safe. If you wanna do face recognition in a safe way, then each consumer would need thousands of dollars worth of hardware, and it still wouldn't be particularly safe.
Nothing beats passwords right now. Maybe in the future.