Betting to Risk Free Fights

[AicecreaME]

Such thing doesn't even exist. If we are talking about bet, then risk will be always involve. Gambling is all about risk and how we manage it, gambling without any risk at all is playing gambling with free satoshis given by the gambling site or whoever sponsors your gambling addiction and not asking in return.

Another way to explain risk is, if you don't know what will happen and really wanted to know the result, that's where you are risking whatever it is to figure out what's gonna happen next.

[Hypnosis00]

The only risk free is not to gamble at all.

As per average, favorites do win most of the time, however, because of the odds, that would still make you unprofitable in the long run.
If you are good to go with just one shot of a bet, then bet on the underdog, but always remember that it could also lose.

Just imagine, your $100 will only win $50 because you bet on the underdog, I think that's too small.

[DoublerHunter]

Low odds are not risk-free, it only has a high chance of winning but it does not guarantee a win, in fact, if you are just betting on low odds all the time, it's guaranteed that you will still lose in the long run. You gotta be smart man, look at where the value is, whether it's the favorites or the underdog, just make your own research before putting a bet, don't rely too much on the odds.

^ Probably the better way to find value is when the public does not give a team nearly enough credit. Not all underdogs did not have the potential to make a profit on the table, sometimes in terms of luck they will win and there are too many cases like this that recently happened. But yeah, doing good research give us a high potential for making a profit even though we place a bet on the underdog team. Each game is unpredictable and you did not even know what will happen next.

[michellee]

When you are betting, you have a risk, and whether that risk is big or small, there will still a risk. No matter how much money you place for a bet, you should be ready for the risk. If you do not want to have a risk, you do not have to gamble because once you gamble, the risk will be behind.

The situations on the game can change anytime, and you need to have a good analysis and have information before you put your bet.

[harizen]

Even 1.00 odds can't guarantee you a risk-free bet even the chances of winning of the dominant one is 90% based on speculators and analysts.

That's why don't even consider it a safe bet. It's even more painful to lose on that line of odds compare to dealing in above @1.5 odds.

To somehow help you what to do, and looks like you have some information about those two fighters, try to make your own analysis based on your own factors and criteria. You can also refer to other analysts and combined it with yours and from there make a wild and fearless forecast about the fight.

[Zilon]

I would still have to do a rethink irrespective of their tight tale of the tape both can't win. Going into their past performances which would help better in predicting their outcome from the present match. I wouldn't dare bet based on risk free fights. since one of the opponent must remain an underdog so why should I risk such fights.

[dothebeats]

I don't think there are 'risk-free' fights at all. There are a lot of ways through which a fight could sway towards the underdog, and you'll never know it since you do not control the variables in the arena. An accidental strike leading to the disadvantage of the favored contender may end the fight abruptly, and even seasoned bookies nor sports analyst won't have any means to know when or how it would possibly happen. Due to this, it is unwise to allocate a week's pay on a bet unless you're willing to lose that pay should the result of the fight go against your bet.

[Fundamentals Of]

I admit I have not watched any of the fighters face each other in the ring. But looking at the stats of both fighters it seems there is no one who is really way way ahead than the other. So there is no risk-free bet on this particular match.

I think there is really no huge favorite in this fight. Rozenstruik is older but only 3 years. But he's got the height as well as the reach advantages. Sakai may be shorter but he's the younger fighter and has at least 10 kgs advantage over Rozenstruik.

[pinggoki]

To be honest 1.50 is not a bad odd, there are more odds that is more worst than that but betting on a risk-free fight? Hell No! I will better bet on E-Sport gambling than betting my money over here because in E-Sport you can do your own research by just checking the gameplays and game styles of each team than risking your money on a free fight however we are in the gambling world where everything is a risk in which you need to risk in order for you to win always remember that there's no such thing as a 100% of winning in gambling.

[Fatunad]

Low odds are not risk-free, it only has a high chance of winning but it does not guarantee a win, in fact, if you are just betting on low odds all the time, it's guaranteed that you will still lose in the long run. You gotta be smart man, look at where the value is, whether it's the favorites or the underdog, just make your own research before putting a bet, don't rely too much on the odds.

Majority would be thinking off about betting on favorite would always win and doesn't mind about possible upset where even myself do also believe on that thing wayback but soon you will realize things where it doesn't really work nor make out guarantee.Yes, chances of winning is high but odds aren't really worth to
test or bet on because one lost will really result into wiping out 2-4 wins that you had made earlier. Just let those people think off that way because
sooner or later they would realize that it doesn't really work that way presumpting about easy bets or easy income when sticking to favorites.

[Oilacris]

Low odds are not risk-free, it only has a high chance of winning but it does not guarantee a win, in fact, if you are just betting on low odds all the time, it's guaranteed that you will still lose in the long run. You gotta be smart man, look at where the value is, whether it's the favorites or the underdog, just make your own research before putting a bet, don't rely too much on the odds.

Majority would be thinking off about betting on favorite would always win and doesn't mind about possible upset where even myself do also believe on that thing wayback but soon you will realize things where it doesn't really work nor make out guarantee.Yes, chances of winning is high but odds aren't really worth to
test or bet on because one lost will really result into wiping out 2-4 wins that you had made earlier. Just let those people think off that way because
sooner or later they would realize that it doesn't really work that way presumpting about easy bets or easy income when sticking to favorites.

Guaranteed win doesnt exist on this world and it do only happen in dreams.Even having 1.01x odds doesnt give 100% to win and its really a bad mindset
to have as a gambler.

You will just make yourself to be an addict and risk out bets and go all in because you do feel out some assurance. For most part of time then its really a winning or heavily favorite would win but there would always be an accompanied risk.

One single loss could really entire wipe your winnings that you had in past bets out of those low odds which i dont see to be worth.

[Fredomago]

Low odds are not risk-free, it only has a high chance of winning but it does not guarantee a win, in fact, if you are just betting on low odds all the time, it's guaranteed that you will still lose in the long run. You gotta be smart man, look at where the value is, whether it's the favorites or the underdog, just make your own research before putting a bet, don't rely too much on the odds.

Majority would be thinking off about betting on favorite would always win and doesn't mind about possible upset where even myself do also believe on that thing wayback but soon you will realize things where it doesn't really work nor make out guarantee.Yes, chances of winning is high but odds aren't really worth to
test or bet on because one lost will really result into wiping out 2-4 wins that you had made earlier. Just let those people think off that way because
sooner or later they would realize that it doesn't really work that way presumpting about easy bets or easy income when sticking to favorites.

They will realized and start to think differently, there's no free of risk in any types of gambling, even you are betting with the heavy favorite there's always shit that might happen along the way.

You are still assuming that you have a much better edge but in terms of odds you are risking much to win a little bit low.

It's up to the bettors understanding though, as there are gamblers who believe on this strategy and some are enjoying it,

winning decently from time to time.

[dunfida]

You would realize through real experience and find out for yourself that you do need lots of wins before hitting up 100% profit on your trading capital then after 1 lost then all of those would be wiped in instant and you would say that you shouldnt be that confident next time.Typical reactions into those
people who do expecting much about sure wins.

[Hydrogen]

Jairzinho Rozenstruik should be the betting favorite here. He's not a guaranteed win. Augusto Sakai does have a potential path to victory.

Rozenstruik's biggest shortcoming is his low strike volume. He models himself after Deontay Wilder believing he only needs 1 punch to KO his opponents and win fights. Past opponents outworked and outpointed Rozenstruik beating him on activity. That is Augusto Sakai's most likely path to victory, should he win.

The real question is what changes Rozenstruik will make if any. Will Rozenstruik try to be more active. Or will he fall into his old habit of looking for the 1 punch knockout. Be outworked. And lost on points.

[AmoreJaz]

Low odds are not risk-free, it only has a high chance of winning but it does not guarantee a win, in fact, if you are just betting on low odds all the time, it's guaranteed that you will still lose in the long run. You gotta be smart man, look at where the value is, whether it's the favorites or the underdog, just make your own research before putting a bet, don't rely too much on the odds.

Majority would be thinking off about betting on favorite would always win and doesn't mind about possible upset where even myself do also believe on that thing wayback but soon you will realize things where it doesn't really work nor make out guarantee.Yes, chances of winning is high but odds aren't really worth to
test or bet on because one lost will really result into wiping out 2-4 wins that you had made earlier. Just let those people think off that way because
sooner or later they would realize that it doesn't really work that way presumpting about easy bets or easy income when sticking to favorites.

Guaranteed win doesnt exist on this world and it do only happen in dreams.Even having 1.01x odds doesnt give 100% to win and its really a bad mindset
to have as a gambler.

You will just make yourself to be an addict and risk out bets and go all in because you do feel out some assurance. For most part of time then its really a winning or heavily favorite would win but there would always be an accompanied risk.

One single loss could really entire wipe your winnings that you had in past bets out of those low odds which i dont see to be worth.

and one can take good examples from boxing, there were many underdogs that did win this year. so yeah, not all favourites or having lower odds mean that it will be risk-free bet or guaranteed win. if you've been betting for quite a while, you already know that there's no such thing as guaranteed win even at low odds. probability of winning may be high but don't forget that an upset may happen anytime.

[Twentyonepaylots]

For me there is no such thing as a risk-free fight especially if it's between two people who are either going to bet their own lives for a title, such as in the case of martial arts tournaments like the UFC and most boxing matches. And if there is some form of balance involved between the two of them, meaning there is an either-or scenario.

[South Park]

Is there even such a thing as a risk-free fight? I mean, both fighters are going to meet each other because they are still a match regardless of the fact that one of them is a favorite and the other underdog.

I do decide on which of the two is probably going to win, but that is not saying the one I picked for my money is going to be the sure winner. The risk of losing is always there.

1.50 is not even the lowest of odds. It is not the most lop-sided of matches.

For as long as the two fighters have complete hands and feet, anybody could turn out the winner.

There are no bets that are risk-free, even bets that offer the possibility of earning money almost anytime you make a bet like arbitraging cannot be said to be risk-free as there are many risks that you are incurring and you could still lose your bet or get your account blocked for being a profitable gambler, what you can do is to use your expertise about a particular sport to try to find games or matches in which the odds do not seem to match what you think it will happen, but this can only be done by those that are experts on a particular sport.

[harizen]

and one can take good examples from boxing, there were many underdogs that did win this year. so yeah, not all favourites or having lower odds mean that it will be risk-free bet or guaranteed win. if you've been betting for quite a while, you already know that there's no such thing as guaranteed win even at low odds. probability of winning may be high but don't forget that an upset may happen anytime.

Just recently, Oubaali vs Donaire; odds to win the match are @1.33 and @3.25 respectively.

The odds of around @1.33 is already considered an 85% winning chance*** but look what happens. Donaire made an upset and what's surprising, it's a TKO where the odds I think are around @6. I'd rather trust a team play matches with odds @1.33 to win a match compared to a single match between player vs player like the sports of boxing as upset always happened.

That's why I told OP to make an analysis out of all the sources he can look at as he seems knowledgeable on those 2 fighters of the subject. It's definitely not wrong if OP chooses the @1.5 odds but we just want to clarify here that there's no such thing as a risk-free bet at that line of odds even at @1.00.

[Saint-loup]

Would you be able to decide which fight could be risk free that you will bet your weekly pay despite the small odd like 1.50 or would you still rethink if there is an upset like Weili Zhang and Rose Namajunas.  

How about Jairzinho Rozenstruik vs Augusto Sakai, is this a risk free fight to you?



Jairzinho Rozenstruik by the way is the one that did the nasty cuts to Allistair's mouth.

Risk free fights don't exist in sport betting, even when odds are 1.01 or 1.00. The only risk free bets existing are on rigged matchs. So if you want to really get a risk free bet, you need to look for some bonuses or promotions offered by sportsbooks. At Stake for example there will be a risk free bet offered for the next fight of his brand ambassador Israel Adesanya : the main event of UFC263, Adesanya vs Vettori 2. Stakes on an Adesanya victory will be refunded in case of a loss of him.

[Fatunad]

Low odds are not risk-free, it only has a high chance of winning but it does not guarantee a win, in fact, if you are just betting on low odds all the time, it's guaranteed that you will still lose in the long run. You gotta be smart man, look at where the value is, whether it's the favorites or the underdog, just make your own research before putting a bet, don't rely too much on the odds.

Majority would be thinking off about betting on favorite would always win and doesn't mind about possible upset where even myself do also believe on that thing wayback but soon you will realize things where it doesn't really work nor make out guarantee.Yes, chances of winning is high but odds aren't really worth to
test or bet on because one lost will really result into wiping out 2-4 wins that you had made earlier. Just let those people think off that way because
sooner or later they would realize that it doesn't really work that way presumpting about easy bets or easy income when sticking to favorites.

They will realized and start to think differently, there's no free of risk in any types of gambling, even you are betting with the heavy favorite there's always shit that might happen along the way.

You are still assuming that you have a much better edge but in terms of odds you are risking much to win a little bit low.

It's up to the bettors understanding though, as there are gamblers who believe on this strategy and some are enjoying it,

winning decently from time to time.

You are indeed right since gamblers does have their own take on dealing with things neither they are fully aware or not when it comes to odds and
the edge that they've been eyeing on.If not then they would realize when they lost. There are indeed players which do really follow up on
heavily favorite players or teams and make out some alteration or changes for some upset match on where this is something we called
experienced one where you can easily switch up if you do see those kind of probabilities to happen and this is why its called
gambling in the first place since we are talking about game of chance on here. heheeehe