Well as far as I see the project will not actually be funded by El Salvador, they just hope that they can find potential investors to come there and participate. Since the country however does not have the highest reputation this could be rather challenging. Also I guess the climate and other factors are not the best that you can find.
What however is unique id that you have a high support from the government which is something that gets more rare lately.
Huh?
You come off as a bit of a bitcoin naysayer.
Of course, projects can be funded in all kinds of ways, and surely there is no black and white situation in regards to some of the balancing that El Salvador has to do in regards to the various aspects of their reputation, their credit worthiness and/or their abilities to carry out projects in ways that they might proclaim (or project) that they are going to be able to do.
Having governmental support for bitcoin and projects related to bitcoin is no minor factor when it comes to El Salvador - especially since they have considerably distinguished themselves (at least so far) regarding how much support and/or bitcoin and bitcoin related promotion that they are willing to involve themselves (whether privately supported, publicly supported or some kind of a public/private joint effort).
It would have had been nice for you (nlovric) to have describe how you believe your post is related to El Salvador specifically, since this thread is about El Salvador, and yeah sure, many of us know that Binance is also involved in El Salvador (but Binance is involved in a lot of places, no?).
I wonder.
Does any forum member know how to give their own comments in regards to any posts and/or links that they provide - besides just posting what someone else says?
Sure the post may well still be valuable, but it would be nice to know if forum members might have some of their own ideas .. whether talking about facts or significance or describing what is contained within the linked-information that they post.