REQUEST FOR ATTENTION OF: All 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants

[Twentyonepaylots]

I beg for my negative trust to be removed   I was too busy to look at the past replies about the 1xbit campaign. I thought it's legit since it hasn't removed for a weeks til now that I saw my negative trust rating

I never intended to join any fraudulent activities. In fact, I've sold some artworks of mine to reputable persons here in the forum. I hope the removal of negative trust rating on my account would be reconsidered.

[mr_ROBOTT]

I beg for my negative trust to be removed   I was too busy to look at the past replies about the 1xbit campaign. I thought it's legit since it hasn't removed for a weeks til now that I saw my negative trust rating

I never intended to join any fraudulent activities. In fact, I've sold some artworks of mine to reputable persons here in the forum. I hope the removal of negative trust rating on my account would be reconsidered.

Something similar happened to me. I just filled out the joining form and after I found out what scammers they are; I even asked them to remove my name from the list of those accepted.
I did not cooperate for a second with such great swindlers.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57100520#msg57100520

[sujonali1819]

Something similar happened to me. I just filled out the joining form and after I found out what scammers they are; I even asked them to remove my name from the list of those accepted.
I did not cooperate for a second with such great swindlers.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57100520#msg57100520

You did a good job by stopping to promote them. If  you think it before joining then this would be more better for you.

So here some people started to come because of tagging them by the OP. But It seems only who have neutral trust before joining the 1xbit campaign are doing care of their reputation now. But who have already some neg feedback they are not care about their reputation and even they have not any problem to promote scam. They can do anything for money.

[robelneo]

They can do anything for money.

I have tagged some of them not only for wearing the scammer's signature but also for openly defending and making them appear that 1XBIT is a victim of fake accusations, with so many accusations it's hard to defend it, they should not defend it, if they want to wear their signature at the expense of getting a tagged then they should go on but do not defend them by posting that they are victims, it's adding insult to injury for the victims.

[Coin_trader]

I beg for my negative trust to be removed   I was too busy to look at the past replies about the 1xbit campaign. I thought it's legit since it hasn't removed for a weeks til now that I saw my negative trust rating

I never intended to join any fraudulent activities. In fact, I've sold some artworks of mine to reputable persons here in the forum. I hope the removal of negative trust rating on my account would be reconsidered.

Good decision on leaving on there signature campaign but I believe that you see the trust rating of 1xbit before you join though. You can simply check it by visiting there ANN thread and the trust score of 1xbit main account. So being busy is not an excuse when joining a campaign next time. Your negative trust will be remove/turn to neutral by Jolly once he became online again as long as you didn't promote them blatantly just like what other users did.

[Marvelman]

/cut/

I just have one question, why are you wearing Blenderwallet's signature right now? I don't know who you're trying to fool, but you're not a part of their sig. campaign.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Already there's enough scams out there that they have to protect themselves from, it doesn't make sense for them to start seeing the community give room for scammers to have their way by advertising freely on the forum.

I agree with you; I'm also just leery of setting a precedent of doing something like this, negging all the members of a campaign, because who knows if the next project someone thinks is a scam will actually be one?  In this case, I'd say the evidence is solid that 1xbit.com is indeed a scam, but I still have reservations.  I'd much, much prefer that Theymos act like a leader and ban the campaign outright rather than just deny them advertising space.  It would seem like he doesn't want blood on his hands (or at least perhaps the legal liability if there is one) but is content with allowing other people to advertise a scam project/exchange--just like he's content with allowing scammers to operate freely on this forum.

As I said, I have no problems with anyone who tags the campaign participants; I just don't like the potential ramifications that might stem from that.  There was a project once that cryptodevil swore was a scam, and he'd warned all the campaign participants that he was going to tag them all--and he is/was on DT.  It later turned out that the project wasn't scamming anyone, that it had been a misunderstanding (and it was so long ago that I don't remember the name of the project, but I think it was one of the ICOs).  My point is that he was on DT and had influence over a number of other members, and had they bullied people into ditching a campaign that they thought was a scam, everyone would have lost.

I'm glad this thread was started, because at least it allows the 1xbit.com campaign participants a chance to see it and respond (or get out of the campaign before their reputations are reddened).  That's the right way to go about it if any tagging is to be done.

[Marvelman]

The 1xbit scammers have also started a thread where they will pay users for effectively writing good things about them.

the thread was supposed to be an "honest review" although I am not sure how honest they are. I've seen negative reviews in the thread too and those were paid also(at least according to what the OP of that thread has posted). although I agree with what NotATether said in that thread. (quoted it below for reference)

There is nothing honest about those reviews. Most of them were made by Adkinsbet shills, and they appear to be run by only one person (as has already been mentioned here).

[FaucetKING]

JollyGood do you think that damaging the trust of others is a funny thing to do?
I removed the signature as soon as i heard of 1xbit's issues, i had no issues with their websites and i thought that they are well known and well reputed then that's why i applied. after a while i encountred the issues and immediately removed their signature and informed all the other members about that. Now you're coming days later to destroy my trust. Thanks so much but you did a wrong move here, if you're happy then you can leave the feedback but fyi i didn't enroll with them neither got added into their participants list.

[Yogee]

A request to ignore all users wearing their signature is also an alternative if they don't take this post seriously.

A request to whom?

To everyone not part of their campaign I guess. I noticed that the accepted participants have prior tags and I doubt they will leave. I'm pretty sure 1xbit wouldn't remove them because they were tagged from joining their campaign. So I thought why not just ignore all their promoters and starve 1xbit of our attention?

Personally, my ignore list probably doubled when I visited their signature thread yesterday.

[tulusikhlas]

hello Jollygood, I beg you once again to review my status. since I can't be a participant in the xBit campaign event, I have deleted my registration in their campaign. with that I hope you reconsider the negative trust you have placed in me.

I can send you a message. so with all due respect please respond.

[Igebotz]

hello Jollygood, I beg you once again to review my status. since I can't be a participant in the xBit campaign event, I have deleted my registration in their campaign. with that I hope you reconsider the negative trust you have placed in me.

Y'all playing the dummy games right now after it was clearly written that no one should participate or promote the scam site but y'all all were blinded by the huge payout, you sold your reputation for a few penny.

[dkbit98]

Honestly, I don't see so much spam coming from people with 1xbit signatures and even if I don't agree with how 1xbit runs things in general, you can't and should not stop them for having paid campaigns in forum.
This is free market and free speech, everyone here knows they are risky and members participating are also taking risks, but I won't tag anyone for joining this campaign,
and better solution would be just to ignore them and don't give them so much attention.
We really really don't need more 1xbit topics in forum.

[FaucetKING]

hello Jollygood, I beg you once again to review my status. since I can't be a participant in the xBit campaign event, I have deleted my registration in their campaign. with that I hope you reconsider the negative trust you have placed in me.

Y'all playing the dummy games right now after it was clearly written that no one should participate or promote the scam site but y'all all were blinded by the huge payout, you sold your reputation for a few penny.

That's not a dummy game, i'm having the same case just like him. We didn't promote the 1xbit, we applied for the campaign and we withdrew our applications, we weren't even listed amount their participants list. Jollygood just went to that campaign and tagged everyone that applied. In my case i withdrew my application and removed the signature as soon as i got the details that 1xbit is having a trust issue and just to mention, i've made some bets in their platform and everything went smooth, how could i guess they have a trust issue, everything were looking fine!
Please refrain from saying "dummy games" and stuffs like that, we're honest, we're not trying to destroy Bitcointalk but this forum is being centralized and big bounty managers are making it impossible for us to join the safest and most trusted campaigns. This thing is about decentralization and now it's fucking being centralized. Now, random guys are tagging us, where the hell is satoshi?

[nutildah]

Now, random guys are tagging us, where the hell is satoshi?

Well now that's a great question and while I don't know the answer - nor do I know how he/she/they/it would feel about the whole trust system to begin with - I do know that trust ratings can be removed, so just have a little bit of patience and I think the situation will resolve itself.

I'm personally not one to tag accounts simply for wearing a signature, but I'm not entirely against it either... depends on the context. In this context it seems that the tag has already served a benefit, and probably no longer does.

[FaucetKING]

Now, random guys are tagging us, where the hell is satoshi?

Well now that's a great question and while I don't know the answer - nor do I know how he/she/they/it would feel about the whole trust system to begin with - I do know that trust ratings can be removed, so just have a little bit of patience and I think the situation will resolve itself.

I'm personally not one to tag accounts simply for wearing a signature, but I'm not entirely against it either... depends on the context. In this context it seems that the tag has already served a benefit, and probably no longer does.

I'm going to say that crypto means decentralization. These couple Bounty managers centralized it all using the trust system of the forum. They leave us for shitty bounties or for shitty campaigns like 1xbit. I think that they are getting fat from the bounty management payrolls and they are working to destroy our accounts one by one, i remember that a very very famous member tagged me because of Yobit but in the mean time a very very known Bounty manager was advertising and managing a campaign that belong to Yobit/ a Forum campaign belonging to a Yobit owned Forum. For Fuck sake, where's equality? The big fuckers' asses gets bigger promoting scams and victims like us gets tagged for a thing that we didn't enroll totally in. are we getting these tags just for making an application and then removing it?
Note that i weren't wearing the signature when i got tagged, i was wearing another one for a long period. The member that tagged me just scrolled in the signature campaign thread and tagged the applicants randomly without checking.

[decodx]

I'm personally not one to tag accounts simply for wearing a signature, but I'm not entirely against it either... depends on the context. In this context it seems that the tag has already served a benefit, and probably no longer does.

I somewhat agree with your position. This is not so much about the participants in the campaign as it is about the organizer. It looks like 1xBit is getting what they deserve.
I don't know if they're scam or not because I haven't personally dealt with them (and I don't intend to), but their way of conducting business is disgraceful. As long as they continue to ignore legitimate accusations against them and, at the same time, wish to promote their business on this platform, they deserve condemnation from the community. Therefore, I support tagging all members who ignore all warnings and are willing to promote anything to get a few extra dollars.

[target]

Just want you to know Jolly that I have never worn the signature of 1xbit. I just apply to it and learn they have actually negative trust so I never wear their signature and participate to another campaign.

This thread is about 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants to which I'm not. Please remove the reg tag.

It was archived in this post the day that I applied to the campaign but never really wear the signature. the next week I was wearing the signature of Non Fungible Defi (NFD) project which my post is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5342118.msg57168345#msg57168345

archive link http://web.archive.org/web/20210528024714/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.0&all=

[decodx]

@mr_ROBOTT, @target, you both applied for bounty in hopes that 1xBIT would accept you and that you would proudly wear their signature. I don't understand why you're complaining here, instead you should really be complaining to 1xBIT about not being included in the campaign.

Given that your campaign is getting stronger, I would like to be added to your list twice.

archive

[decodx]

@mr_ROBOTT, @target, you both applied for bounty in hopes that 1xBIT would accept you and that you would proudly wear their signature. I don't understand why you're complaining here, instead you should really be complaining to 1xBIT about not being included in the campaign.

Given that your campaign is getting stronger, I would like to be added to your list twice.

archive

But did I participate?
I signed up for thousands of campaigns that later turned out to be scams, but I never got involved with them.
Do I need to show a list of them?
This is also an archived post. This means that before I got a red trust, I found out the identity of this site.
It is easier for you to look for what I have said against this site.
Again, I ask JollyGood to remove this red trust from my account.

But you had an intention. And don't tell us you didn't know about that company's reputation. Trust ratings are clearly visible for anyone to see.

By the way, it's amusing to see you getting your arse kicked all over the place. 

/cut/
Jesus christ, soar loser. I'll make it easy for you moving forward so you don't have to mald like this - you are hereby officially banned from participating in ANY competitions that I'm managing on this forum, regardless of the site I'm managing it for.

There you have it, enjoy!