REQUEST FOR ATTENTION OF: All 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants

[Erdogan]

Funny thing is, I'm not a participant in the 1xBit signature campaign but still tagged.

@JollyGood, if you are the most correct person you should at least check first if you want to tag a casual user like me. You can check all campaign Spreadsheets created by 1xBit, am I a participant of them?
If my name is in one of their campaign Spreadsheets then you can tag me properly as it was purely my fault.

It is not justified for user like you to give red tag without real evidence, this is like you are abusing your position.

I did have time to sign up for their campaign, but I didn't even wear their attributes and I wasn't even accepted. So why are you tagging me, do you have a personal problem with me?

Thanks default user, you are free to do what you like.

JollyGood is so jealous that I earn more than him from signature campaign that if he could,

JollyGood has no reason whatsoever to be jealous of you because of your earnings through this scam campaign because he was among the user of this forum that didn't participate in signature for some months before he decided to join the signature paying campaign.
If he could do that before now there's no reason for someone like JollyGood to be jealous of you and for the record, he is one of the users thats no room for scams, spam, and everything that has to do with illegality.

Incredible!     Groupie? 

he would give negative trust to everyone who even thinks about applying to 1xbit signature campaign. 

Thats not true. Some users applied for the campaign but later revoke the application some minutes later, and their account was not giving negative trust.

It is possible that someone has managed to get away from this freak, but this man have not everything right in the head.

I love this story: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.msg57513554#msg57513554

He gave a negative trust to someone who had an account roughly the same as he is on this forum  (his negative have nothing to do with 1xbit  )

There are more such stories if you take a closer look.. As a Groupie, you should know these things    No offense, just kidding   

[1715349185]

1715349185

[1715349185]

1715349185

[dataispower]

Some people is been deserved by the token they received. Why the user unyil apply for 1×bit campaign, is not that is not aware that the campaign is scam project, the thing that gave it the courage to apply is because of the first tagged it got from monbux  since 2017-09-21 and it felt that no campaign can accept it. When you cross check the application you will know that it apply their intensionally. So it deserve the tagg. Assuming the campaign functions, it wouldn't have complained

[shasan]

As of now, all 1xbit scammers signature campaign applicants will not receive a negative tag by default when their application is seen.

Instead, they will be sent a PM requesting they withdraw their application. A link will be added in the PM to this thread so they understand why they face receiving negative feedbacks if they display the signature or avatar.

If new participants display the 1xbit scammers signature or avatar 48 hours after they have been sent a PM requesting them to refrain from participating, then they face receiving negative feedback.

It is a very good decision that the applicant won't receive negative trust from you and instead of the negative trust they will receive a notification (private message) to remove the application and avoid to use the signature as well as avatar of 1xbit. It will help those who will apply unknowingly about the scam activity of 1xbit.

[JollyGood]

The list in the OP has been updated. Increased from 124 to 129 names in total.

[logfiles]

It looks like the relaunched another campaign 1x₿it.com | Benefit Season Signature Campaign | Members + Up to $100/week [OPEN]

I am going to tag a few more users who think their reputation doesn't matter when it comes to advertising scam.

Thread archived for reference https://web.archive.org/web/20220608180653/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401757.0;all

[lovesmayfamilis]

As of now, all 1xbit scammers signature campaign applicants will not receive a negative tag by default when their application is seen.

I wonder how you can name the user who applied twice for this scam.
Probably the first time he escaped the negative tag from being warned. But he again applies for participation in a month. Can this be considered ignorance?
Or do we now have to run after such users with "handkerchiefs" and warn them every time so that they do not stumble?



Remarkably, he appears on the forum only to apply.

And one more

Bitcointalk Username: MonsterV
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=418797;sa=summary
Btc Address: bc1q8g5aeuyv5xrq7qshld7cydnec0lv5tjlvx56p2
Post Count: 5284
Forum Rank: Legendary
Wear sig and avatar: Yes

There are many other accusations against 1xbit, to much to all discuss here.

That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I worry with all of you not really fair when claiming with 1xbit as scam gambling casino, did you see with another new gambling site Bitlucy and all of you active promote that gambling platform. I have fund on Bitlucy gambling casino and try to log in have show detail like this

Open up a scam accusation. I don't know how BitLucy alleged scam is connected to a thread warning 1xbit signature campaign participants

Here is the board for scam accusations ----> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0
and the scam report format ----> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260073.0

[lovesmayfamilis]

It looks like the relaunched another campaign 1x₿it.com | Benefit Season Signature Campaign | Members + Up to $100/week [OPEN]

I am going to tag a few more users who think their reputation doesn't matter when it comes to advertising scam.

Thread archived for reference https://web.archive.org/web/20220608180653/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401757.0;all

Yesterday, in line with JollyGood's warning, I also informed MonsterV that participating in this scam will result in a negative reputation score. But besides the fact that the user is already aware that the company he advertises is not welcome on the forum, he left his signature unchanged.
Should we understand that he does not care what to advertise, and how this will affect his reputation?

[_BlackStar]

Yesterday, in line with JollyGood's warning, I also informed MonsterV that participating in this scam will result in a negative reputation score. But besides the fact that the user is already aware that the company he advertises is not welcome on the forum, he left his signature unchanged.
Should we understand that he does not care what to advertise, and how this will affect his reputation?

Looks like it's about time some people took action as the user ignored the warning to stop promoting the scam site in his signature. He still ignores warnings and continues to promote him to this day, so it's not our responsibility to keep his reputation clean even after being rated so many times.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159912.msg60337769#msg60337769


IMO, he should be tagged like any other user promoting the same scam site. I don't think he should be treated in any special way unless he starts changing his mind and stops promoting the campaign now.

Tags sent: Ignore the warnings and continue to promote the scam site at his signature for a few dollar. I don't trust this user.

[logfiles]

Yesterday, in line with JollyGood's warning, I also informed MonsterV that participating in this scam will result in a negative reputation score. But besides the fact that the user is already aware that the company he advertises is not welcome on the forum, he left his signature unchanged.
Should we understand that he does not care what to advertise, and how this will affect his reputation?

I tagged his profile.

He definitely does not care about what he advertised, but rather the money. He is also so stupid on ruining the reputation of the account. 1xbit sig campaign won't be here forever.

2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=988663

I did not tag Freeesta because he removed the signature but I am keeping tabs on his profile. He removed the signature because he was not accepted into the campaign, had it been otherwise, he would be advertising 1xbit scam right now.

[notblox1]

He definitely does not care about what he advertised, but rather the money. He is also so stupid on ruining the reputation of the account. 1xbit sig campaign won't be here forever.

I just saw that 1xbit reactivated their new campaign in forum and they are collecting most of the members with negative feedback with low quality posts, and they don't care about that.
Tagging their profiles is not helping very much and it's not giving good results, but good thing this time is they don't have that many accepted members, only eight of them.
Maybe we should all start ignoring all participants in this campaign, and theymos could add some algorithm that would keep ANN topics in lower pages.

[klidex]

The list in the OP has been updated. Increased from 124 to 129 names in total.

I didn't join  campaign after reading this news, and at that time I rarely returned to my account.  after I saw my account I got negative trust from you.  please delete it

[Apocollapse]

I want to know why he has not given negative feedback yet.
He joined the sceam bounty
Below I give you the evidence you judge

Read the whole thread first before posting

I did not tag Freeesta because he removed the signature but I am keeping tabs on his profile. He removed the signature because he was not accepted into the campaign, had it been otherwise, he would be advertising 1xbit scam right now.

I find it's funny how the user that promote scam campaign and got negative feedback, reporting the other users who applied on the campaign to get red tagged too. Do you seek a justice here? any DT users have different view and perspective to give negative feedback and you can't force any users to do what you want, why you not red tagged him?

[logfiles]

I didn't join  campaign after reading this news, and at that time I rarely returned to my account.  after I saw my account I got negative trust from you.  please delete it

Why did you apply to carry a scammer's signature and avatar in the first place if it was not your intention to join the campaign?
And most importantly, why is it that you have realized you had negative feedback after almost 3 months after applying for the 1xbit campaign?

[FatFork]

I didn't join  campaign after reading this news, and at that time I rarely returned to my account.  after I saw my account I got negative trust from you.  please delete it

Why did you apply to carry a scammer's signature and avatar in the first place if it was not your intention to join the campaign?
And most importantly, why is it that you have realized you had negative feedback after almost 3 months after applying for the 1xbit campaign?

He had hoped to cash in his long-inactive alt account via a 1xbit scam campaign, but the plan backfired. The only reason he cares about the negative rating now is because he wasn't accepted into the campaign in the first place. 

that's right!  I have been off on bitcointalk for a long time, and to get back, I had to reset my password.  and maybe I also don't know about what's going on here, after a long time I left this place

That's a lie. The seclog does not show any password changes on your account.
https://bpip.org/Profile?id=877388

[JollyGood]

Yesterday, in line with JollyGood's warning, I also informed MonsterV that participating in this scam will result in a negative reputation score. But besides the fact that the user is already aware that the company he advertises is not welcome on the forum, he left his signature unchanged.
Should we understand that he does not care what to advertise, and how this will affect his reputation?

Thank you lovesmayfamilis.

I am sorry for not updating this thread recently but you took steps to advise the user (MonsterV) to remove the signature, which he clearly has decided to not do.

I think it is clear that the income received by promoting a scam is far more important to some users than receiving negative trust. That is their decision and the benefits or consequences of that action are of their own making.

I tagged his profile.

He definitely does not care about what he advertised, but rather the money. He is also so stupid on ruining the reputation of the account. 1xbit sig campaign won't be here forever.

I tagged his account too. I have also updated the OP and added his name to the list. The total number now stand at 130 names.

[supto005]

I've been working here since 2017 however for a couple of years I am inactive in this forum. So, recently I have participated in 1xbit camping & I just made a post of Proof of Authentication & after that I saw that I got red trusts. I never promote the campaign just made a post of Proof of authentication. After that, I sent a message to JollyGood & For my busyness, I have taken a break from this forum. That's why I made the post lately.

 I know I made a mistake I was joining the campaign without doing any research it's my fault and for that, I really apologize & I didn't promote the camping. I just made a post of Proof of Authentication. I am guilty for that please remove the red trust.

[logfiles]

So, recently I have participated in 1xbit camping & I just made a post of Proof of Authentication & after that I saw that I got red trusts. I never promote the campaign just made a post of Proof of authentication.

I personally don't send red trust for this kind of cases, at least someone has to promote well aware that it's an established scam before I tag them, but you should have yourself to blame. How do you apply for a campaign without looking at the reputation of the casino?

Should we say you didn't even see this?


And the warnings that were all over the campaign thread?

Assuming the accepted you. How do we know that you were never going to promote them?

[supto005]

How do you apply for a campaign without looking at the reputation of the casino?
Should we say you didn't even see this?

How do we know that you were never going to promote them?

As I already said that I participated in the campaign without doing any research & I know it's my fault. So, After getting red trust I am more careful to promote any Campaign. Thus, from my end, I can ensure that there will no second chance to promote this type of project.

[FatFork]

As I already said that I participated in the campaign without doing any research & I know it's my fault. So, After getting red trust I am more careful to promote any Campaign. Thus, from my end, I can ensure that there will no second chance to promote this type of project.

It's great to hear that, and I hope you keep it up. But, since you haven't been realy active on the forum since you tried to promote the 1xbit scam, it's difficult to tell whether you mean it or not.
The red tag on your profile shouldn't prevent you from being an active member and contributing positively to the community. This will make it easier for you to defend your position and your reputation.