We were able to link these accounts by other means as well but do not want to disclose everything here right now as to not make it easier for him to abuse in the future.
I remember in the past there was a scam accusation where the gambling site(forgot the name of the gambling site or the name of the thread) wouldn't want to publicly disclose how they found out how multiple accounts are linked to the accuser because like you said it might make it easier for the accuser to abuse it in the future. I remember the people in the thread including the accuser agreed to pick a number of reputable members picked by the accuser to review the evidence gathered by the gambling site and decide whether the evidence presented by the gambling site is valid or not.
Now if the issue continues and the OP decided to deny your claim, the same thing as in the past could be done to this issue. the problem with what I suggested is that will people believe/be satisfied with what the reputable members decided or if reputable members will be willing to participate in it. although, I remember reading in that thread that the way the issue was handled where members were included to review the evidence given by the gambling site should rarely be done and is not recommended.
Honestly, who cares if he took advantage of an exploit. Thats not his fault.
what do you mean it is not his fault(I am not saying he actually did it)? but I am pretty sure(I am assuming) there is a part of their TOS that states if a gambler playing on their platform exploited one of their games a punishment will be given to the abuser.
And thanks for first uploading an unedited picture showing all the email addresses, very professional. Hope someone saved this.
if you look closely, the first part of all the emails is blurred.
