DT Member Please Tag these Members

[Tronx]

It look like some members are added recently (directly) without applying in the main    
1xbit.com signature campaign (open) thread. They don't care about the community and advertising scam gambling site. They should be tag like all others.

Members:
sikke  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=211177)  Week 16 No 34

sovie  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196) Week 16 No 35


Spreadsheet Link:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit#gid=0

[1714749115]

1714749115

[1714749115]

1714749115

[rhomelmabini]

Rest assured this will be tagged by the DT members sooner or later and good thing bringing that up, seeing the history they really haven't applied. Looks like just a series of alt of 1xbit, the accounts are from 2014 and the history trace back 2019 being active before the recent postings. Not doubting if it's being controlled by 1xbit itself.

[panjul07]

It look like some members are added recently (directly) without applying in the main    

There must be a private way to apply in the campaign, I also see some other users in spreadsheet but they did not apply in the thread.
Means that they apply it by direct pm to the campaign manager.

They don't care about the community and advertising scam gambling site. They should be tag like all others.

Money oriented people, they do not care about what they are doing as long as they can earn money easily.

Members:
sikke  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=211177)  Week 16 No 34

sovie  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196) Week 16 No 35

You can report it in this thread : REQUEST FOR ATTENTION OF: All 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants by JollyGood

[The Sceptical Chymist]

sikke  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=211177)  Week 16 No 34
sovie  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196) Week 16 No 35

Just based on their usernames and the fact that both accounts are from 2014, I initially thought they might be alt accounts, but their posting style is different--or at least their grasp of English seems to be.  But they both post a lot in Economics, too.  Very weird.

There must be a private way to apply in the campaign, I also see some other users in spreadsheet but they did not apply in the thread.

Yeah, I'm wondering how they both got into the campaign without applying.  As you said, they might have PM'ed the campaign manager, but that seems like a very odd way to go about it.  I'm thinking they might have been invited and that they might know the manager or someone else and got in through nepotism.

[Igebotz]

Yeah, He started it on the thread where he was attempting to deceive the trust system. What a dreck of a mindset. lol

There must be a private way to apply in the campaign, I also see some other users in spreadsheet but they did not apply in the thread.

Yeah, I'm wondering how they both got into the campaign without applying.  As you said, they might have PM'ed the campaign manager, but that seems like a very odd way to go about it.

we still looking for new members can add but need good account with neutral trust and posting thanks! you can send applicate in private message if not wanting public.

[JohnBitCo]

Yeah, He started it on the thread where he was attempting to deceive the trust system. What a dreck of a mindset. lol

There must be a private way to apply in the campaign, I also see some other users in spreadsheet but they did not apply in the thread.

Yeah, I'm wondering how they both got into the campaign without applying.  As you said, they might have PM'ed the campaign manager, but that seems like a very odd way to go about it.

we still looking for new members can add but need good account with neutral trust and posting thanks! you can send applicate in private message if not wanting public.

Trust system can't be deceived. Even if the applicants are selected privately, they will have to wear the signatures. Everyone can see who are wearing 1xbit signature and not being tagged. Even if some are missed, people like OP bring them to our attention.
Good Work OP 

[SFR10]

They should be tag like all others.

I've tagged both of them...

• Normally, I would've given them another chance by asking them to remove it first, but seeing that they've clearly read the campaign thread ^{[prior to applying privately (refer to @igehhh's post)]}, as opposed to a bunch of spammers that literally apply in any campaign, then both of them deserve receiving such ratings!

[LoyceV]

@Tronx: if you believe someone deserves negative feedback, you shouldn't wait for DT-members but tag them by yourself too! The more users understand and use the Trust system, the more decentralized it becomes.

See:

Once you fully understand the system, it's important to start using it:

• Did you do a trade in which you risked funds? Leave feedback!
• Did you see users who left accurate Trust feedback on many accounts? Add them to your Trust list!

Anyone can leave feedback, and anyone can customize their Trust list!

But first, keep reading, so you're sure you know the difference.

(click the quote for my Beginners guide to the Trust system).

[UmerIdrees]

@Tronx: if you believe someone deserves negative feedback, you shouldn't wait for DT-members but tag them by yourself too! The more users understand and use the Trust system, the more decentralized it becomes.

How can the trust system become decentralized when the low rank members / Non - DT members trust rating does not mean anything.
Lets suppose OP and few others ( non - DT members ) tag them, it wont hurt the accounts. Its only when the DT members tag the account, it matters the most.

[Little Mouse]

Lets suppose OP and few others ( non - DT members ) tag them, it wont hurt the accounts. Its only when the DT members tag the account, it matters the most.

When majority of the community members understand and practice the feedback system, it matters. Otherwise, for tag from non DT member, it doesn’t matter much to be honest. However, someone have to start. Today may be a few start practicing, tomorrow it can be increased. I hope you got the point.
Again, without sending valid feedback, you can't be a DT member. People will only add you to their trust list if they find your sent feedbacks are valid.

[Kittygalore]

The desperate cunts are being tricky now and 1xbit is always in on it, didn't expect that PMing them would work unless those two are an underling of who's behind 1xbit, I don't think it will ever stop.

[Timelord2067]

How can the trust system become decentralized when the low rank members / Non - DT members trust rating does not mean anything.

Campaign managers will look at a user's trust feedback (both "trusted" and "untrusted") and will usually look at notes that indicate scamming, or alt accounts.

Regardless of whether or not the user placing the feedback is on DT or not is irrelevant given campaign managers have trusted users with a history of investigating alt accounts which overrides the convoluted DT system.