I am Spartacus. I can answer any questions you may have.
In terms of the actual content, the author has designed the letter quite smartly knowing full well that the vast majority of conspiracy nuts won't read it, and the parts that they do read, they won't understand so will just accept what he has said is true. He starts off stating mostly accurate facts with good references to scientific studies about how COVID attacks almost every body system, causing widespread organ failure, to lure people in to thinking he knows what he is talking about. (But I thought it was just a flu? Or according to some, it doesn't even exist? So it is a deadly disease now that you think it suits your agenda? Gotcha.)
Most people who claim that COVID-19 is "just a flu" do not understand the disease even remotely and have made no effort to study the underlying pathophysiology. Hyperinflammatory COVID-19 that puts people in the ICU is basically sepsis. It has been shown that sepsis can be treated with antioxidants, like intravenous Vitamin C (see the MATH+ protocol for COVID-19, as well as papers regarding the repurposed drugs - fluvoxamine, budesonide, famotidine, and so on - and their antioxidant activity).
Ultimately, the damage of COVID-19 is caused by lipid peroxidation, where electrons are stripped from fats in the body, causing them to become oxidized. As a matter of fact, COVID-19's pathology is somewhat unique among viruses in the sense that immune over-activation and free radical damage is a primary mechanism of injury. It is very likely that it shares this trait with SARS, however.
By the time he gets on to talking about treatments, he knows most of his audience won't be checking the references (if they ever did to begin with). For example, his reference for the statement that intubation is what kills these patients -
https://www.nature.com/articles/pr2009174 - is a vaguely related paper published in 2009 that has absolutely nothing to do with COVID at all. Out of his three links for this statement - "The correct treatment for severe COVID-19 related sepsis is non-invasive ventilation, steroids, and antioxidant infusions" - only one of them talks about ventilation and clearly states that intubation is necessary.
Read it again.
A delicate balance exists between ROS production and the antioxidant defenses that protect cells in vivo. This balance may become disturbed under conditions of hyperoxia, inflammation, or ischemia-reperfusion (excessive generation of ROS) or in the presence of limited or impaired antioxidant defenses.
COVID-19 down-regulates Nrf2, impairing antioxidant defenses. This means that the enzymes your phagocytes (neutrophils, etc.) use to attack pathogens start digesting your own cells with peroxide and bleach instead.
Ischemia causes a buildup of hypoxanthine, succinate, et cetera, that form superoxide radicals when O2 is reintroduced and these substances begin breaking down by their enzymatic pathways. This is called ischemia-reperfusion injury.
What those "unrelated" documents show, to a thorough reader, is that shocking hypoxic cells with oxygen causes lipid peroxidation by reperfusion.
Since the virus already causes lipid peroxidation, this merely layers even more lipid peroxidation atop lipid peroxidation, causing the tissues in the lungs to basically dissolve.
COVID-19 patients have blood that is chemically incapable of transporting oxygen due to a buildup of hypochlorous acid that is stripping iron out of their heme and competing for O2 binding sites. What this means is that they will suffer from "silent" hypoxia, where they appear to be breathing just fine, but are suddenly turning blue in the face as their red blood cells chemically refuse to carry O2.
This has been directly observed in COVID-19 patients.
Pumping O2 into the lungs does not make RBCs chemically incapable of carrying O2 somehow magically capable of carrying it. All it does is produce more ROS injury.
By the way, all this iron stripped out by hypochlorous acid is reactive, and forms deadly hydroxyl radicals that oxidize the lining of blood vessels through the Haber-Weiss and Fenton chemical reactions with hydrogen peroxide and superoxide.
Proning and venting without scavenging radicals will 100% kill people. The radicals strip electrons from phospholipids, PUFAs, cholesterol, cardiolipin, DNA, anything within reach. The oxidized lipids cause a feedback loop of inflammation and autoimmunity by triggering pattern recognition receptors. Look up what "damage-associated molecular patterns" means.
These people are dying of something that's sort of like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis going off simultaneously in the lining of their vascular system. It is a virus that triggers an autoimmune syndrome akin to sepsis, but strangely without any shock and accompanying loss of blood pressure, in many cases.
The rest of this section follows the same theme, with him either not referencing sections which are purely speculation, using references which do not support his claims as above, or in some cases, using references which actively disprove his claims, such as one of his references "supporting" ivermectin -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539925/ - which clearly states "The antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven
in vivo." (In vivo means in living organisms).
The majority of clinical trials of antivirals (any antivirals, not just Ivermectin) enroll people who have no virus left in their bodies. That is, hospitalized patients. Then, they idiotically claim that these antivirals don't shorten the length of hospital stays.
Why don't they shorten the length of hospital stays? Because there is no virus left in the patients' bodies.
Google it. Go to Google Images, and put in COVID-19 clinical course. They all show the same thing. Peak viral load occurs right around when someone becomes symptomatic. By the time hyperinflammation sets in about 5 to 7 days later, the viral load has tapered off to almost nothing.
Using antivirals on people who have no virus in their bodies is not only futile, it tells us nothing about their prophylactic effects, if any.
Many of the concerns raised about the vaccine have been corroborated (in far greater detail) by Stephanie Seneff:
https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDFRead the sources and the leaked documents within.
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/06/26/confidential-documents-reveal-moderna-sent-mrna-coronavirus-vaccine-candidate-to-university-researchers-weeks-before-emergence-of-covid-19/https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295/NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements.pdfRalph Baric signed a Material Transfer Agreement that showed he took delivery of Coronavirus mRNA vaccine-related materials co-owned by NIH and Moderna on December 12th, 2019, practically a whole month before we were sent the sequence to SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. 2019-nCoV), on January 11th, 2020. Moderna claims they made a vaccine from that sequence two days later, on January 13th. But as the MTA shows, Moderna already had a vaccine for an unspecified coronavirus a whole month earlier, before an outbreak was even announced. This is
incredibly suspicious.
Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, previously worked for Alain Merieux's company, bioMerieux. Alain Merieux is a buddy of the CCP and helped them build the WIV's P4 laboratory.
The NIH/NIAID, DTRA, and USAID contributed over a hundred million dollars to Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance NGO. EcoHealth Alliance subcontracted these grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for them to conduct gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses, in violation of the 2014 moratorium on federal funding for SARS GOF research (essentially, Anthony Fauci and the NIH ignored the moratorium, offshored the research to China, and laundered the money through EcoHealth Alliance).
https://peterdaszak.comAs for the neural lace stuff, this is not just hypothetical, nor is it science fiction. It is very much real.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60sJames Giordano's files show that nanoparticles can be used to influence brain activity, and explicitly describes their use by hostile foreign powers to target civilians and use them to change mood, behavior, et cetera, in such a way as to damage society and cause chaos.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike makes the BBB more permeable, which would assist nanoparticles in crossing it.
Robert Langer, the cofounder of Moderna, was a colleague of Charles Lieber and co-wrote a paper with him.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/01/28/metro/harvard-scientists-arrest-stuns-colleague/Charles Lieber is a bionanotechnology expert at Harvard whose papers describe brain-computer interfaces made with nanoparticles.
Charles Lieber was arrested for douple-dipping and taking money both from DARPA and from the Wuhan University of Technology, under China's R&D-headhunting Thousand Talents Plan.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-indicted-false-statement-chargesDARPA has a program called the BRAIN Initiative, as well as the N3 program, the explicit goals of which are to develop non-invasive or minimally-invasive injectable nanoparticle BCIs, a.k.a. "Neural Laces", for disabled soldiers to control prosthetics, or for supersoldiers to control drones, and so forth.
https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2019-05-20The vaccine has been found by independent researchers to contain unknown nanoparticles.
https://www.orwell.city/2021/06/la-quinta-columna-5G-graphene-oxide-and-neuro-rights.htmlEven though I marked that particular section of the letter as speculative, and it is, it is certainly the case that all of these things, taken together, constitute more than enough circumstantial evidence to, at the very least, raise the alarm.
