1XBIT campaign could be the next longest running campaign even with scam reports

[dunfida]

What's your insight on 1XBIT campaign are they going to be one of the longest-running campaigns.

As you know scammers are not moderated in this forum, that's the problem, can't do much for the 1xbit campaign, but we have done what we can but that doesn't mean they have to stop, their payouts to participants are high and they accept color marked members.

My view is of course there is, in my opinion the members in this forum don't care anymore about their 1xbit campaign and gambling site, unfortunately victims from outside the forum are increasing every day, over time they will stop themselves to promote their campaigns here, I'm sure it will happen, not last long.

On the time that they would find that it isnt really relevant to make out some advertisement on here and find out that they are just wasting some money

allocated for marketing then they would definitely stop but for now they could still do all they want because they do have the funds and its true that

scams arent moderated but the community could really give out that warning and awareness that people should stay away on this one.

[Sirait]

I don't really see the point of not banning 1xbit from this entire forum. Why are they allowed to keep advertising even though they are a well documented scam? This seems to me as a gross negligence in part of the Bitcointalk moderators. I understand that some people are desperate to make some money, but I think in the long term, more people will lose money rather than make it.

this is an open forum so anyone is free to be in this forum, if you feel disturbed then just ignore it or just leave this forum because criticizing the moderator's way of working is the same as being dissatisfied with the freedom that exists in this forum.

we all have the right to play on any gambling site and also join the signature campaign on any gambling site.

[Oasisman]

Companies who are tagged as scam or have any other issues that made their name painted with red and still running a signature campaign and accepting red tagged users will encourage other users to participate into a shady project regardless If it will destroy their forum reputation just like this user thought.

I don't know if you paid attention, but there are some DT members in the forum who are giving a red tag for very bland things .. Of course they have the right to do so, because they do it according to their opinion. However, as a consequence, the number of red tag accounts increases very quickly. In my opinion, signature campaigns which will accept accounts with neagtive trusts will start appearing soon, as it happens in bounty campaigns. So even if the 1xbit signature campaign ends, I am not afraid of finding a new campaign.

You guys could've saved your reputations If you stayed away from that campaign after you found out that it has an issue, or at least check the status of that platform before applying.
Yes, you're right you can't blame the DT's for tagging you because that's the right thing to do. Participating in a shady business as an advertiser means you're one of them.

[Naficopa]

Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.

I don't know the plans of the 1xBit marketing team, so I don't know if this campaign will last for long, but it looks like they are happy with the results so far as they decided to launch a second campaign:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376183.0
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0

Both are active and run simultaneously.

I don't understand why they created two campaigns? I know you're not part of the management of this scam casino, but it's kind of weird that they have two high payout campaigns and they refuse to pay customers who deposited and won at the casino, so they're taking the customers' hard-earned money to pay campaign participants and legitimize the casino. Is strange that

It seems they are testing various forms of campaigns. The main campaign has a standard code of signature and is long-term. They launch additional campaigns for the needs of events and they last a week or two. At least I drew such conclusions from what they have announced and done so far.

Companies who are tagged as scam or have any other issues that made their name painted with red and still running a signature campaign and accepting red tagged users will encourage other users to participate into a shady project regardless If it will destroy their forum reputation just like this user thought.

I don't know if you paid attention, but there are some DT members in the forum who are giving a red tag for very bland things .. Of course they have the right to do so, because they do it according to their opinion. However, as a consequence, the number of red tag accounts increases very quickly. In my opinion, signature campaigns which will accept accounts with neagtive trusts will start appearing soon, as it happens in bounty campaigns. So even if the 1xbit signature campaign ends, I am not afraid of finding a new campaign.

You guys could've saved your reputations If you stayed away from that campaign after you found out that it has an issue, or at least check the status of that platform before applying.
Yes, you're right you can't blame the DT's for tagging you because that's the right thing to do. Participating in a shady business as an advertiser means you're one of them.

I was previously red tagged for a little thing which made my account worthless. That's why I joined the 1xBit signature campaign.

[Zilon]

The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.

There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sites

[Naficopa]

The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.

There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sites

If the situation were clear, surely large football clubs or even international football federations would not allow 1xBit to be advertised next to their name. I know the situation is quite controversial, but I think that before a large football club signs an advertising contract, it has lawyers to check it out. I am not a specialist, but they should be because they really live off of it.

[Vannie12]

Most times it's not about the money. Many accusations came up against 1xbit and the made efforts to resolve this issues but weren't given much attention instead many insisted they were scammers and WI forever remain. Personally I joined the campaign to see for myself  how reliable they are and I will say they have been the best campaign and still standing. It's a matter of choice on what one choose to hold on to

Everyone here desires to earn someday from a campaign signature and so far 1xbit has proven to be reliable to their signature participants and no week passes without each participant who has meet their weekly requirements getting their funds in their wallet. We all anticipate to have 1xbit last even longer than any other campaign on the forum and if they don't  they still deserve some accolades they have been reliable enough for so long now

Ofcourse its all about the money. Most of the signature campaigns only accepts higher ranked members. Seldom accepts members and lower ranks that's why you joined the campaign. You're eagerly wanting to be paid as soon as possible here.
Well, I doubt that once 1xbit fall, you will be able to find managers that will accept you for the negative trust. Youngsters like us here in the forum need to understand the consequences as much as possible.

[Fundamentals Of]

It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.

Correct. My account was worthless before I joined 1xBit signature campaign.
Im sure that for $400 you can buy clean Legendary account, or at least Hero.

But please don't think I am in favor of what you are doing. You've probably done the right thing as far as your account is concerned. You are earning from an account that is considered useless already given the many red trusts that it gained. But please be aware that what you are promoting is generally a scam platform. By earning, you are actually influencing others to use a platform that will take away their money. For yourself, all is good because you are earning good. For others, they're at risk.

[uneng]

The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.

There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sites

Check the faq section of this gambling review site and you will see:

Q: Who owns 1xbit?
1xbit is owned and operated from 1xCorp N.V. which is licensed in Curacao. This is the same group that owns 1Xbet.

1xbit review

You can also paste 1xCorp N.V. directly on Google and the search will link to 1xbet instantly.

Actually I've found the same complaints we see regards 1xbit on this forum in another reviews sites, but regards 1xbet. Mainly issues with gamblers who were able to grow their bankroll after some time betting, and once they did, their accounts were freezed (no withdrawls allowed anymore).

[aleandromagno]

The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.

There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sites

Check the faq section of this gambling review site and you will see:

Q: Who owns 1xbit?
1xbit is owned and operated from 1xCorp N.V. which is licensed in Curacao. This is the same group that owns 1Xbet.

1xbit review

You can also paste 1xCorp N.V. directly on Google and the search will link to 1xbet instantly.

Actually I've found the same complaints we see regards 1xbit on this forum in another reviews sites, but regards 1xbet. Mainly issues with gamblers who were able to grow their bankroll after some time betting, and once they did, their accounts were freezed (no withdrawls allowed anymore).

As far as I know, representatives of 1xbit claim that 1xbet is a separate company. But it is possible that the owner is the same.
If it is the same capital group, it means that it is one of the largest casinos and bookmakers in the world.

[uneng]

As far as I know, representatives of 1xbit claim that 1xbet is a separate company. But it is possible that the owner is the same.
If it is the same capital group, it means that it is one of the largest casinos and bookmakers in the world.

I don't doubt they are one of the largest bookmakers in the world, what becomes even more surprising they are in such important position, while behaving in a shady way with their customers.

I know you promote them and everyone needs money for a living, but don't you feel bad for those who have been scammed by 1xbit and 1xbet?

As I see there is a wide variety of cases against their brands, and not only isolated accusations, like the ones against another casinos. So it's not possible to say it's persecution.

[Darker45]

As to whether this campaign will be one of the longest-running campaigns on this forum or not, we cannot tell. Surely, it will depend on how much improvement this campaign gave to their platform's statistics, probably in terms of number of new users, number and amount of bets, and so on.

But the point is that however well they promote their site, for as long as the accusations are rising and remain unsolved, they couldn't reach the success they want. User experience should be their priority.

[The Cryptovator]

Let earn something to red-tagged users. The participants of the campaign either red-tagged from the beginning of joining the campaign or got tagged after joining the campaign. Something like a red-tagged campaign. I don't know if it's run long, but it's an opportunity for 1xbit to promote scam casinos by possible scammers or by scammers. The problem is forum users especially those who are newbies do not see who wearing the signature. They probably jump into the scam by seeing their greedy offers and that's how the campaign lasts long. Just imagine if 1xbit does not get a response from the forum they won't run a campaign for longer. We don't have a way to ban them although we don't like to see them on the forum as long as they comply with forum rules.

[Naficopa]

It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.

Correct. My account was worthless before I joined 1xBit signature campaign.
Im sure that for $400 you can buy clean Legendary account, or at least Hero.

But please don't think I am in favor of what you are doing. You've probably done the right thing as far as your account is concerned. You are earning from an account that is considered useless already given the many red trusts that it gained. But please be aware that what you are promoting is generally a scam platform. By earning, you are actually influencing others to use a platform that will take away their money. For yourself, all is good because you are earning good. For others, they're at risk.

I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.

[Oshosondy]

I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.

What is your opinion. From what I get from your post is that 1xbit is taking low quality posters. I am not saying you are a low quality posters, but you said you were unable to join a signature campaign before 1xbit came. Likely you are also preffering to join bounty campaigns until you joined 1xbit. What I can say is that you should try to increase you quality way of posting, have the merit required and see yourself join a better campaign will be achievable.

The second is that you did not care if some people will see your signature, click on it and register on 1xbit. If the people are scammed, you do not care. What you care most about is to join a campaign, you do not care if the site is shady or not.

[Naficopa]

I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.

What is your opinion. From what I get from your post is that 1xbit is taking low quality posters. I am not saying you are a low quality posters, but you said you were unable to join a signature campaign before 1xbit came. Likely you are also preffering to join bounty campaigns until you joined 1xbit. What I can say is that you should try to increase you quality way of posting, have the merit required and see yourself join a better campaign will be achievable.

The second is that you did not care if some people will see your signature, click on it and register on 1xbit. If the people are scammed, you do not care. What you care most about is to join a campaign, you do not care if the site is shady or not.

Before joining the 1xBit campaign, I took part in bounties, because I already had a red trust, so the quality of the posts did not matter, because I couldn't join any other signature campaign anyway.

Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.

[TwitchySeal]

Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.

Sure you could.  You could say something about all the players that have had money stolen from them by 1xbit.  You are responsible for helping drive traffic to 1xbit after all.  

You choose not to though.  Because they pay you.  You could help other members avoid getting scammed, but instead you do the opposite.  Because 1xbit is giving you money.

[stomachgrowls]

Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.

Sure you could.  You could say something about all the players that have had money stolen from them by 1xbit.  You are responsible for helping drive traffic to 1xbit after all.  

You choose not to though.  Because they pay you.  You could help other members avoid getting scammed, but instead you do the opposite.  Because 1xbit is giving you money.

Wonder on what he would say if he wasnt able to be accepted on the campaign? For sure he would really be saying that  1xbit should really be avoided.

You could really expect people on having those u turn of decisions whenever they do get money from or lets say they wouldnt care on what  the communities views and perceptions towards it as long he got paid.

He wont really be reminding about his account reputation though. At least he do make out some benefits on his red tagged account.lol

[jrrsparkles]

I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.

What is your opinion. From what I get from your post is that 1xbit is taking low quality posters. I am not saying you are a low quality posters, but you said you were unable to join a signature campaign before 1xbit came. Likely you are also preffering to join bounty campaigns until you joined 1xbit. What I can say is that you should try to increase you quality way of posting, have the merit required and see yourself join a better campaign will be achievable.

The second is that you did not care if some people will see your signature, click on it and register on 1xbit. If the people are scammed, you do not care. What you care most about is to join a campaign, you do not care if the site is shady or not.

Before joining the 1xBit campaign, I took part in bounties, because I already had a red trust, so the quality of the posts did not matter, because I couldn't join any other signature campaign anyway.

Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.

Money matters but for some respect is more important said by Paul Walker in FF movie if I am not wrong.

Atleast you should try their site and sense how the feeling of getting scammed by someone then you won't support it even though if they are paying you.

[Oshosondy]

Money matters but for some respect is more important said by Paul Walker in FF movie if I am not wrong.

Atleast you should try their site and sense how the feeling of getting scammed by someone then you won't support it even though if they are paying you.

This is exactly my point, it is like working for a thief so the thief will be able to steal more. In this case the thief is later known and charged to court, anyone the thief implicated as co-workers will also be among that will face justice. This is what is happening to 1xbit participates for supporting a betting platform that was and still accused of wrongdoing that can continue to result to money loss for 1xbit users.