While in theory everything is possible, in reality a scammer simply doesn't have the patience to build for so long for a pretty much uncertain result.
Scammers want easy money/easy results. So this behavior would not match with scammer's psychology.
Anyone can be a scammer, but that does not mean that everyone should be treated like a scammer if there is no evidence they are a scammer.
Sure, it is possible that GazetaBitcoin is an alt of some scammer, but I am not aware of any evidence to suggest that is the case. Nor am I aware of any accusations of GazetaBitcoin scamming anyone, credible or otherwise. [...]
You can argue semantics as to what he should be called [...]
Thank you both, NeuroticFish and PrimeNumber7, for your comments and involvement here.
And, speaking of
semantics, thank you also for explaining to PaperWallet the difference between
possible and
probable. But, have no fear, he knows this difference, but he's just acting dumb. And he's acting dumb for a very specific reason, which I'll explain below. I hoped, up to this point, that he will stop being childish, but seeing that his tantrum continues, let's see what it's based of.
As you probably guessed yourselves, it has nothing to do with TF case
It's just that PaperWallet is biased against me for a specific reason.
A while ago, he
created a flag against FortuneJack, a flag which was,
in my opinion (and not just mine), inappropriate, therefore I opposed it.
Excepting that, from his own will, PaperWallet stated that he is willing to give a small prize to all users which would either support or oppose his flag. That was his own will, without being coerced by anyone else.
Afterwards, seeing that users are opposing his flag,
he started to be delusional, stating ridiculous things, such as he will curse the prizes he was going to award (facepalm moment), in a sore attempt to make users to ask him to
not send that prize anymore lol.
The 1 mBTC you’ll receive has a curse associated with it for those who oppose it, so even a 99% atheist might want to return it afterwards to the wallet it came from, fees on me up to 0.02 mBTC. The curse is stronger when you lack integrity and less important if you’re stupid, but in both cases well merited.
You don’t need this 1mBTC for your curse, you’ve just earned it
You are allowed to return it back to same wallet it came from, if you don’t want my second prediction above to come true.
Of course, to such allegation, replies like this one seem best approach:
Lol. You're a sore loser when you don't get your way
TL;DR: PaperWallet is a
sore loser which has nothing to do with TF, nor he gives a damn about what TF did in the past
All he cares about is that I opposed his flag and now, no matter what I would have said, he would have to say the opposite.
This topic could have been about other notorious scammers or other repugnant individuals, such as El Cabron, master-P, Butterfly Labs, pirateat40, cablepair, humanrightsfoundation etc. etc. etc. No matter the subject, PaperWallet's reaction would have been the same.
I hope that things are more clear now about his views
