🦉 Owl.games 🦉 Web 3.0 Crypto Casino & Sportsbook - BTC-Metamask-Walletconnect

[owlgames]

Lessons learned that we should always charge bankroll deposit for this kind of risks if we were to provide similar service again.

This is a very valuable lesson for you to verify everything carefully otherwise it is very possible that scammers will use your software and it will seriously damage your reputation.
I see you're re-opening the signature campaign that was paused before, congratulations, I hope this can brings good things to your Casino.

I think SandBoxCasino is a scam and owlGames has allowed the casino to operate using its company name (Cyber Galaxy B.V.).  OwlGames seems to have complete control of the back-end, but claims they don’t handle the casino’s wallet. SandBoxCasino has been completely unresponsive since their last and final statement on CasinoGuru that they were not paying me because I violated their terms by using a VPN, despite sandboxcasino openly stating it was acceptable in bitcointalk and LCB forums.

It’s clear SandBoxCasino has no intention of ever paying me, despite owlGames getting involved. OwlGames needs to take responsibility and pay me the $127,000.

Please complete your kyc first as we have seen you accessed your account y'day on Aug 16th but haven't submitted anything.

If we want us to back up your case you should submit the KYC within 2 weeks. And before you complete the KYC you have NO right to intentionally accuse us for not being act on your case.

You are free to send licensor a complaint either on SandBOX or Owl.games. In fact we strongly suggest you do that instead of making wrong accusation on different websites. We have already asked you to show some respect as we have already stood out to help push SandBOX to fix your case, but if you keep posting these false and misleading claims we will have our lawyer team sue you and we will see you on court in Florida.

I doubt that he will submit the KYC since he knew that he will not gonna win this case that’s why he resort to the desperate move which is attacking both the casino at the same time rather than do some negotiations to clear his case. Only court will make this issue resolve because there’s already a case in both party here. This is the only way to resolve it unless you both decided to come up with a settlement to stop this inconvenience on both party.

In my opinion. Owl should be taken out of the picture because they already give a fact that they are not affiliated with to the Sandboxcasino which is the real involved. They just do there job as software provider to give comment about the software they provide that being questioned. This is a topic should be discussed only on Sandboxcasino because attacking Owl right now is already a spam and against the rule of the forum.

Yes, we have actually informed SandBOX that we want to cancel the partnership but we are still in discussion for a proper exit route for it. SandBOX is a liability to our reputation now and we endeavor to fix it.

[Coin_trader]

Hello, it appears the client doesn't want to hear or proceed with suggested route.

1.We are not owned, operated or have any relation to owl.games. We use a software provider for our games that's it.

2. Client is refusing to conduct any KYC requirements, and strangely none of his duplicates.

Every comment on public forums by sandboxcasino.io states they are against KYC as evidenced by FrankBank’s post on Bitcointalk.org where he stated this about KYC: “I agree it shouldn't be applied to the crypto users“.

They posted on LCB.org that they have “no KYC policy” (July 22, 2022 posting on lcb.org)

SandBoxCasino has also stated clearly that the other 13 accounts must do kyc too before the issue can be resolved. I only have 1 account at SandBoxCasino and I don’t have any way to get 13 other people to provide their KYC, so the whole process is pointless and simply another stall tactic to avoid paying me.

To the casino management- please stick to your stance posted on public forums about no KYC for crypto. You have dragged this out for 2 months and only now are you coming up with the KYC excuse. The amount of requested information is ridiculous! Please live by your motto of “It's Simple: Fun and Fair.”

Sources about no KYC policy: https://lcb.org/onlinecasinobonusforum/direct-casino-support/sandboxcasino-io-tu-support-and-complaints-thread

I suggest that you should move this topic on the scam accusation thread that your created or Sandbox ann thread because Owl already post already there statement about there stand against your case. They are now cutting ties with Sandbox which you have good case here. Stop badgering there ANN now because you are just hurting other business. Owl is your only chance to really prove that you are telling the truth.

Yes, we have actually informed SandBOX that we want to cancel the partnership but we are still in discussion for a proper exit route for it. SandBOX is a liability to our reputation now and we endeavor to fix it.

At first I thought Owl will gonna keep standing with sandbox despite its shady way to handle the accusation professionally, but ending the partnership only show that this casino have balls to stand for the truth so you got my respect. I hope that you really help the user on his fight against sandbox since you are the only entity who can prove that his winnings is legit because  you are the software provider that can validate the profit. Please do your part to release the official statement about the real result of his game history whether it’s valid or cheat.

[owlgames]

Hello, it appears the client doesn't want to hear or proceed with suggested route.

1.We are not owned, operated or have any relation to owl.games. We use a software provider for our games that's it.

2. Client is refusing to conduct any KYC requirements, and strangely none of his duplicates.

Every comment on public forums by sandboxcasino.io states they are against KYC as evidenced by FrankBank’s post on Bitcointalk.org where he stated this about KYC: “I agree it shouldn't be applied to the crypto users“.

They posted on LCB.org that they have “no KYC policy” (July 22, 2022 posting on lcb.org)

SandBoxCasino has also stated clearly that the other 13 accounts must do kyc too before the issue can be resolved. I only have 1 account at SandBoxCasino and I don’t have any way to get 13 other people to provide their KYC, so the whole process is pointless and simply another stall tactic to avoid paying me.

To the casino management- please stick to your stance posted on public forums about no KYC for crypto. You have dragged this out for 2 months and only now are you coming up with the KYC excuse. The amount of requested information is ridiculous! Please live by your motto of “It's Simple: Fun and Fair.”

Sources about no KYC policy: https://lcb.org/onlinecasinobonusforum/direct-casino-support/sandboxcasino-io-tu-support-and-complaints-thread

3.3.5 Sandbox Casino agents reserve the right to carry out additional verification procedures, if deemed necessary by the Sandbox Casino  payments team. Such verifications may include copies of a player’s passport, national Identity Card, copies of a player’s utility bills, and/or copies of the debit/credit cards used to deposit. This rule applies for both FIAT and Cryptocurrency players.

per terms and conditions at https://docs.sandboxcasino.io/

Also same in docs.owl.games

No KYC in needed for sign up, but for larger amounts every casino will do KYC to enforce AML policy.

If you still want our coordination to get paid, complete the kyc within 2 weeks.

Please note we won't reply you in our owl.games thread anymore.

If you want our coordination, you should contact us on our 24x7 support channel or send us an email, we will cc sandbox team to keep them updated.

We have notified them that we have officially stepped in your case.

[Piesel]

First I will like to congratulate the owl team and operator for the relaunch of the signature campaign, this move will continue to increase your presence and make your casino ads more public. Most importantly haven't read about the previous incidents that led to the pause of the campaign for a while before resuming it again today. I can also see that your token has a relatively stable price and the token has also increased in value lately even when other tokens are struggling in the market.

[the rise]

First I will like to congratulate the owl team and operator for the relaunch of the signature campaign, this move will continue to increase your presence and make your casino ads more public. Most importantly haven't read about the previous incidents that led to the pause of the campaign for a while before resuming it again today. I can also see that your token has a relatively stable price and the token has also increased in value lately even when other tokens are struggling in the market.

no need for us to know what incident caused them to delay their signature campaign the important thing now is that they are back on and it is much better.
besides that they really care about their tokens

[Piesel]

no need for us to know what incident caused them to delay their signature campaign the important thing now is that they are back on and it is much better.
besides that they really care about their tokens

The team have already stated the reason beforand if you read some posts and replies a few pages back you will get all the gist, but the truly there is no need to make any more emphasis on that incident any longer the most important thing is that the team have over come that situation d have moved on to a better phase right now.

I can also see how seriously the team also takes the owl token and that is evident in the way they are building the project ecosystem and the activities of the token in the market.

[lmvegas]

Can we get positive and talk about owl and how they keep adding games and features? Finally a casino that is focused on growth and expansion.

[gunhell16]

It's good to hear that the Owl gambling platform is back to give gamblers a chance to gamble at their casino online. Actually, this is the first time I've looked at their website, and it's also the first gambling site I've seen where you don't need to sign-up just to play, instead you can play using the meta mask wallet you have and that's the thing that OWL I likes.

However, I only noticed one thing that wasn't in the owl, and that was Dogecoin, it wasn't in the list of deposit coin names. I was going to try to gamble on the owl using Dogecoin that's all, but I can't see because its not really there. I'm just asking why dogecoin is not included in the OWL gambling platform, because almost all cryptocurrency gambling that I've been to has dogecoin included, apart from OWL it's not included, I'm just asking.

[aioc]

Can we get positive and talk about owl and how they keep adding games and features? Finally a casino that is focused on growth and expansion.

I'm supporting you on this but because there are members who believed that the complaint is not properly addressed, we'll have these people dropping here to spam or continue their unresolved complaint, this is expected because this is an unmoderated thread but I agree that there are a lot of positive things happening now on Owlgames and one of this is the resumption of their signature campaign, I hope its a long one like the last one, I just notice that they are paying on Bitcoin not on Owl token anymore, it used to be part Bitcoin and part Owl token.

[Eternad]

Can we get positive and talk about owl and how they keep adding games and features? Finally a casino that is focused on growth and expansion.

I'm supporting you on this but because there are members who believed that the complaint is not properly addressed, we'll have these people dropping here to spam or continue their unresolved complaint, this is expected because this is an unmoderated thread but I agree that there are a lot of positive things happening now on Owlgames and one of this is the resumption of their signature campaign, I hope its a long one like the last one, I just notice that they are paying on Bitcoin not on Owl token anymore, it used to be part Bitcoin and part Owl token.

Owl is already ending there partnership with Sandbox and they are now helping sammy to resolve his claims against Sandbox. Actually is not directly involved on this issue because it happened on different casino. It just happened that they are in partner due to the software that Sandbox is using.

Now that they are in the process of ending partnership, I think it’s time to bury the hatchet and move on. Let’s leave the case on Sandbox thread.

[aioc]

Can we get positive and talk about owl and how they keep adding games and features? Finally a casino that is focused on growth and expansion.

I'm supporting you on this but because there are members who believed that the complaint is not properly addressed, we'll have these people dropping here to spam or continue their unresolved complaint, this is expected because this is an unmoderated thread but I agree that there are a lot of positive things happening now on Owlgames and one of this is the resumption of their signature campaign, I hope its a long one like the last one, I just notice that they are paying on Bitcoin not on Owl token anymore, it used to be part Bitcoin and part Owl token.

Owl is already ending there partnership with Sandbox and they are now helping sammy to resolve his claims against Sandbox. Actually is not directly involved on this issue because it happened on different casino. It just happened that they are in partner due to the software that Sandbox is using.

Now that they are in the process of ending partnership, I think it’s time to bury the hatchet and move on. Let’s leave the case on Sandbox thread.

That's good to know I hope the signature campaign will be a long one, I'm still holding all the tokens I bought a few months ago yes I sold some due to an emergency but make it a point to buy it back, they made a strong showing in the bear market I'm sure they will continue to perform better and reach another all time high, their last one was only two moths ago.

[Piesel]

First I will like to congratulate the owl team and operator for the relaunch of the signature campaign, this move will continue to increase your presence and make your casino ads more public. Most importantly haven't read about the previous incidents that led to the pause of the campaign for a while before resuming it again today. I can also see that your token has a relatively stable price and the token has also increased in value lately even when other tokens are struggling in the market.

The Punch you made is quite right because some tokens is not being recognised directly but theirs some factors that being make those tokens not to be recognised so from my own idea I think one of the factors that do not to make tokens to being recognized. Is is lack of advertisement, so that's when it lack promotion and the token speculation will not be much to be invested on. So signing a signature campaign in the forum will make the pictures of the token to be known and the people will it start investing in them because of the advert

I agree with you on that, having a signature campaign is the ultimate way to make a token or any brand visible to the cryptocurrency industry, and that is why most companies especially gambling companies want they advert on this forum for as long as possible.

If a project wants to expose its marked brand to the entire cryptocurrency market then there is a need for continuous marketing, just like what the owl team is doing right now, a lot of others are doing the same and that will increase the traffic to the platform because the general public will always be aware of their projects and service they offer.

[robelneo]

First I will like to congratulate the owl team and operator for the relaunch of the signature campaign, this move will continue to increase your presence and make your casino ads more public. Most importantly haven't read about the previous incidents that led to the pause of the campaign for a while before resuming it again today. I can also see that your token has a relatively stable price and the token has also increased in value lately even when other tokens are struggling in the market.

The Punch you made is quite right because some tokens is not being recognised directly but theirs some factors that being make those tokens not to be recognised so from my own idea I think one of the factors that do not to make tokens to being recognized. Is is lack of advertisement, so that's when it lack promotion and the token speculation will not be much to be invested on. So signing a signature campaign in the forum will make the pictures of the token to be known and the people will it start investing in them because of the advert

I agree with you on that, having a signature campaign is the ultimate way to make a token or any brand visible to the cryptocurrency industry, and that is why most companies especially gambling companies want they advert on this forum for as long as possible.

If a project wants to expose its marked brand to the entire cryptocurrency market then there is a need for continuous marketing, just like what the owl team is doing right now, a lot of others are doing the same and that will increase the traffic to the platform because the general public will always be aware of their projects and service they offer.

I don't want to say there's a need but the relaunching of the signature campaign is very timely, they also addressed their issue they are doing good and they are doing what needs to be done, marketing and continuous interaction are two of the things that can establish or regain the trust, I hope they can keep up and lead the casino based tokens in establishing their own share  of the market and also start the trend, there are still few profit sharing and casino based token in the industry.

[Piesel]

I don't want to say there's a need but the relaunching of the signature campaign is very timely, they also addressed their issue they are doing good and they are doing what needs to be done, marketing and continuous interaction are two of the things that can establish or regain the trust, I hope they can keep up and lead the casino based tokens in establishing their own share  of the market and also start the trend, there are still few profit sharing and casino based token in the industry.

You are right, casinos base token is still a new trend and just a few casinos already have a marketable token and owl token is one of such projects that has developed a successful token market that is competing with other well-known tokens in the market today and the casino is also running well at the same time. This is a good development and to see that the casino recently relaunched its marketing show the length of the owl token team will go to market their products to the larger cryptocurrency community.

[dimonstration]

I don't want to say there's a need but the relaunching of the signature campaign is very timely, they also addressed their issue they are doing good and they are doing what needs to be done, marketing and continuous interaction are two of the things that can establish or regain the trust, I hope they can keep up and lead the casino based tokens in establishing their own share  of the market and also start the trend, there are still few profit sharing and casino based token in the industry.

You are right, casinos base token is still a new trend and just a few casinos already have a marketable token and owl token is one of such projects that has developed a successful token market that is competing with other well-known tokens in the market today and the casino is also running well at the same time. This is a good development and to see that the casino recently relaunched its marketing show the length of the owl token team will go to market their products to the larger cryptocurrency community.

I would say that the issue recently triggered the interest again of Owldao to promote again in the forum because they know how reliable the forum is in terms of publicity. Remember that the accuser only post here about his and the community support him that cause to opening his case to the public. You can only do this on Bitcointalk because the case will just gonna forgotten if this is only post on other mediocre forum.

I’m glad Owldao decided to promote here again and saw what forums worth.

[Juggy777]

I don't want to say there's a need but the relaunching of the signature campaign is very timely, they also addressed their issue they are doing good and they are doing what needs to be done, marketing and continuous interaction are two of the things that can establish or regain the trust, I hope they can keep up and lead the casino based tokens in establishing their own share  of the market and also start the trend, there are still few profit sharing and casino based token in the industry.

You are right, casinos base token is still a new trend and just a few casinos already have a marketable token and owl token is one of such projects that has developed a successful token market that is competing with other well-known tokens in the market today and the casino is also running well at the same time. This is a good development and to see that the casino recently relaunched its marketing show the length of the owl token team will go to market their products to the larger cryptocurrency community.

I would say that the issue recently triggered the interest again of Owldao to promote again in the forum because they know how reliable the forum is in terms of publicity. Remember that the accuser only post here about his and the community support him that cause to opening his case to the public. You can only do this on Bitcointalk because the case will just gonna forgotten if this is only post on other mediocre forum.

I’m glad Owldao decided to promote here again and saw what forums worth.

@dimonstration I totally agree that they got their early big break because of the forum, and when they paused the campaign many felt that they were not doing enough promotion, and now it looks like that the owner read all the feedback from this ANN and swiftly implemented the necessary changes. Furthermore I would like them to constantly engage with us here, because that’ll establish more trust and it’ll help them with their promotions too.

[Beparanf]

I don't want to say there's a need but the relaunching of the signature campaign is very timely, they also addressed their issue they are doing good and they are doing what needs to be done, marketing and continuous interaction are two of the things that can establish or regain the trust, I hope they can keep up and lead the casino based tokens in establishing their own share  of the market and also start the trend, there are still few profit sharing and casino based token in the industry.

You are right, casinos base token is still a new trend and just a few casinos already have a marketable token and owl token is one of such projects that has developed a successful token market that is competing with other well-known tokens in the market today and the casino is also running well at the same time. This is a good development and to see that the casino recently relaunched its marketing show the length of the owl token team will go to market their products to the larger cryptocurrency community.

I would say that the issue recently triggered the interest again of Owldao to promote again in the forum because they know how reliable the forum is in terms of publicity. Remember that the accuser only post here about his and the community support him that cause to opening his case to the public. You can only do this on Bitcointalk because the case will just gonna forgotten if this is only post on other mediocre forum.

I’m glad Owldao decided to promote here again and saw what forums worth.

@dimonstration I totally agree that they got their early big break because of the forum, and when they paused the campaign many felt that they were not doing enough promotion, and now it looks like that the owner read all the feedback from this ANN and swiftly implemented the necessary changes. Furthermore I would like them to constantly engage with us here, because that’ll establish more trust and it’ll help them with their promotions too.

Yeah. Surprisingly they become active here the moment the issue escalated on there ANN thread. They are silent when the issue just being discuss on the other casino ann thread even though there name is already linking by the casino involved. Good thing that the  community here is very active on dealing issue like this especially if the victim has a solid proof about his case. Personally I wouldn’t believe on the victim if don’t see other user stand against this.

[babygun]

Yeah. Surprisingly they become active here the moment the issue escalated on there ANN thread. They are silent when the issue just being discuss on the other casino ann thread even though there name is already linking by the casino involved. Good thing that the  community here is very active on dealing issue like this especially if the victim has a solid proof about his case. Personally I wouldn’t believe on the victim if don’t see other user stand against this.

We all know that most (scam) accusations are not valid, but sometimes they are and than it is always a good idea to share all your information on this forum as the community is very active and they can put some pressure on the casinos. All legit casinos should try be active on here to respond to accusations or else the reputation can get down quite quickly.

[coin-investor]

I don't want to say there's a need but the relaunching of the signature campaign is very timely, they also addressed their issue they are doing good and they are doing what needs to be done, marketing and continuous interaction are two of the things that can establish or regain the trust, I hope they can keep up and lead the casino based tokens in establishing their own share  of the market and also start the trend, there are still few profit sharing and casino based token in the industry.

You are right, casinos base token is still a new trend and just a few casinos already have a marketable token and owl token is one of such projects that has developed a successful token market that is competing with other well-known tokens in the market today and the casino is also running well at the same time. This is a good development and to see that the casino recently relaunched its marketing show the length of the owl token team will go to market their products to the larger cryptocurrency community.

I would say that the issue recently triggered the interest again of Owldao to promote again in the forum because they know how reliable the forum is in terms of publicity. Remember that the accuser only post here about his and the community support him that cause to opening his case to the public. You can only do this on Bitcointalk because the case will just gonna forgotten if this is only post on other mediocre forum.

I’m glad Owldao decided to promote here again and saw what forums worth.

@dimonstration I totally agree that they got their early big break because of the forum, and when they paused the campaign many felt that they were not doing enough promotion, and now it looks like that the owner read all the feedback from this ANN and swiftly implemented the necessary changes. Furthermore I would like them to constantly engage with us here, because that’ll establish more trust and it’ll help them with their promotions too.

As a holder of Owl token, it pains me to see that there is a lack of activity like a paused marketing campaign, scam accusations things that can harm the reputation of the project, I'm glad that they addressed all these issues, they have a strong project, one proof of that is they've gone up when the market is dipping and even the top coins in the market are going down I'm sure the price can recover and they will soon establish as one of the casinos worth playing, I hope the team can keep up because the competition is stiff.

[Coin_trader]

We all know that most (scam) accusations are not valid, but sometimes they are and than it is always a good idea to share all your information on this forum as the community is very active and they can put some pressure on the casinos. All legit casinos should try be active on here to respond to accusations or else the reputation can get down quite quickly.

You’re right, I’m guilty on this because I usually don’t believe on this kind of scam accusation due to a bunch of fake scam accusation in the past. But on this case, @sammy provide a valid evidence to back his claim while the sandbox representative due a shitty response on handling this case and that’s the time I realized that Sandbox don’t want to cooperate on handling the issue properly.

I’m not updated anymore on the case but I’m sure that this will be a long argument since the money involved is too huge for them to admit mistakes because they can avoid this at the beginning if they already provide the evidence that the user cheated to get his profit.