Abuse of Edit function to reach quota

[Issa56]

It's understandable. Most, if not all, of 1xbit's participants had extremely slim chances of joining a decent campaign. The majority of them are spammers, lack basic English knowledge and/or have negative trust, which immediately blocks them from even applying to most campaigns.

People promoting 1xbit's also have enough negative trust, am sure no reputable manager will accept them in any of their campaign, but I think some of those people participating in 1xbit are having alts account which they are using in participating in other good campaigns and they are making good posts with the account, I just think they are spamming because the campaign have been tagged as scam campaign and the manager those not care, I think users participating in signature campaign deserves more than negative trust, all of them should be banned, because their post is of no use to the forum.

They will not care about this report because they have nothing to lose already there account has been red tag already for various unwanted activities watching those guys nor giving to much attention on what they do is useless. People like them will not care if they promote a good platform or even do the right thing because all they care is the money they can earn from shady platform they promote.

The two accounts are having more than 5 negative trust, they already know that their account is useless already, so even if you add more negative trust is of no use, they will continue spamming, the only thing that can happen that will affect them is if their account is ban, atleast they won't be able to receive the penny they are receiving for the signature campaign they are spamming for.

[_BlackStar]

People promoting 1xbit's also have enough negative trust, am sure no reputable manager will accept them in any of their campaign, but I think some of those people participating in 1xbit are having alts account which they are using in participating in other good campaigns and they are making good posts with the account, I just think they are spamming because the campaign have been tagged as scam campaign and the manager those not care, I think users participating in signature campaign deserves more than negative trust, all of them should be banned, because their post is of no use to the forum.

Nobody cares even when you can convince people that some of the accounts promoting the casino are alt. The reputation of the participants has become bad even most of them are accounts that have been tagged for various reasons, account sales or so on. Most of them I've tagged, but there's no way to stop them from using that signature unless the forum ban it.

Until now this campaign is not banned, whatever the reason. But I believe some participants of this campaign have been banned regardless of whether they are spammers or plagiarists.

[Ultegra134]

It's understandable. Most, if not all, of 1xbit's participants had extremely slim chances of joining a decent campaign. The majority of them are spammers, lack basic English knowledge and/or have negative trust, which immediately blocks them from even applying to most campaigns.

People promoting 1xbit's also have enough negative trust, am sure no reputable manager will accept them in any of their campaign, but I think some of those people participating in 1xbit are having alts account which they are using in participating in other good campaigns and they are making good posts with the account, I just think they are spamming because the campaign have been tagged as scam campaign and the manager those not care, I think users participating in signature campaign deserves more than negative trust, all of them should be banned, because their post is of no use to the forum.

That's not the case, most if not all of their participants knew what they were getting themselves into. They don't care if they've received negative trust. As you've also mentioned yourself, chances are that most of them are alt accounts of other members, bought accounts or simple spammers who had zero chances or entering a decent campaign.

Thus, these members have nothing to lose. Those with more than two brain cells withdrew their application after being warned by DT higher members about 1xbit.

[Awaklara]

Unfortunately, there are no rules to this in the forum, but all the things do not need the rules. Somethings are to be done morally but again these people don't care.

they don't care because the account they use to participate in the scam campaign is not their main account. or their previous primary account which they later switched to another account due to negative tagging.

those who realized had to withdraw their POA when warned by other members. but mostly I think they already know the condition of the casino. they intentionally sign up to join a fraudulent campaign, no matter the reputation of their account.

for friends who are active on the gambling board, it might be better if they are willing to report shitposts on the board. Campaign participants made several posts on gambling boards.

[Issa56]

Thus, these members have nothing to lose. Those with more than two brain cells withdrew their application after being warned by DT higher members about 1xbit.

Am sure most of them think they don't have anything to lose, but they are losing their reputation, how will I wake up everyday and I keep on seeing negative trust in my account, how will they feel when they know that  they are putting peoples funds at risk just because of the little amount they are being paid for marketing for scam project, if anybody is been scammed then I will have to blame people marketing for them for that, so people might be new to the forum and they don't know about the trust system, they might just see someone wearing the signature code and they will decide to try it out, at the end they will get scammed.

[yahoo62278]

Unfortunately, there are no rules to this in the forum, but all the things do not need the rules. Somethings are to be done morally but again these people don't care.

they don't care because the account they use to participate in the scam campaign is not their main account. or their previous primary account which they later switched to another account due to negative tagging.

those who realized had to withdraw their POA when warned by other members. but mostly I think they already know the condition of the casino. they intentionally sign up to join a fraudulent campaign, no matter the reputation of their account.

for friends who are active on the gambling board, it might be better if they are willing to report shitposts on the board. Campaign participants made several posts on gambling boards.

Some of the users joining 1xbit had gotten negative trust in the past I believe. Those users probably thought their accounts were trash at the time, but then here comes 1xbit allowing neg rep users. Now those neg repped accounts have a purpose.

The fact that 1xbit allows neg accounts says alot about the site.

If any of you notice people editing their posts later, make sure you are reporting their posts. You might also take screenshots of before and after for more proof.

[aylabadia05]

That's not the case, most if not all of their participants knew what they were getting themselves into. They don't care if they've received negative trust. As you've also mentioned yourself, chances are that most of them are alt accounts of other members, bought accounts or simple spammers who had zero chances or entering a decent campaign.

Thus, these members have nothing to lose. Those with more than two brain cells withdrew their application after being warned by DT higher members about 1xbit.

I once reminded someone who applied for the 1xbit signature campaign. I don't think the owner of the account knows more about the reputation of the 1xbit campaign and the effect it will have on promoting the campaign. Due to their ignorance, I think it is necessary to be reminded to remove the signature code before the account owner is marked.



In contrast to accounts that ignore reputation in favor of getting paid weekly by promoting such campaigns. Most likely they have more than one BTT account.

[Ultegra134]

Unfortunately, there are no rules to this in the forum, but all the things do not need the rules. Somethings are to be done morally but again these people don't care.

they don't care because the account they use to participate in the scam campaign is not their main account. or their previous primary account which they later switched to another account due to negative tagging.

those who realized had to withdraw their POA when warned by other members. but mostly I think they already know the condition of the casino. they intentionally sign up to join a fraudulent campaign, no matter the reputation of their account.

for friends who are active on the gambling board, it might be better if they are willing to report shitposts on the board. Campaign participants made several posts on gambling boards.

Some of the users joining 1xbit had gotten negative trust in the past I believe. Those users probably thought their accounts were trash at the time, but then here comes 1xbit allowing neg rep users. Now those neg repped accounts have a purpose.

The fact that 1xbit allows neg accounts says alot about the site.

If any of you notice people editing their posts later, make sure you are reporting their posts. You might also take screenshots of before and after for more proof.

Is there any point in reporting their posts? By the time a moderator reviews it, it will have already been edited and filled in. Usually, it's within the 10-minute time frame, and it's not even shown as edited. Do moderators or administrators have access to see the initial post? Does Ninjastic.space, for instance, keep track of such posts? If the answer to at least one of the previous questions is yes, then I'll be on the lookout for any blank posts left to be edited in the future. Otherwise, it's no use.

The only positive thing regarding 1xbit is that they don't have an abundance of participants. Imagine them having up to 100 users. Most, if not all, of their users are suspicious, accused of multiaccounting or using traded accounts or involved in scams. It's disappointing.

[Awaklara]

Is there any point in reporting their posts? By the time a moderator reviews it, it will have already been edited and filled in. Usually, it's within the 10-minute time frame, and it's not even shown as edited. Do moderators or administrators have access to see the initial post? Does Ninjastic.space, for instance, keep track of such posts? If the answer to at least one of the previous questions is yes, then I'll be on the lookout for any blank posts left to be edited in the future. Otherwise, it's no use.

The only positive thing regarding 1xbit is that they don't have an abundance of participants. Imagine them having up to 100 users. Most, if not all, of their users are suspicious, accused of multiaccounting or using traded accounts or involved in scams. It's disappointing.

suppose editing is done in a short time. I guess it doesn't matter. what happens in the case of 1xbit signature campaign participants are edits made 1 day after the post-marking is made. it's just to chase post quotas to get rewards.

other users in the 1xbit campaign did the same. either by coincidence or indeed they are the same person.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=328196

proof from  Ninjastic.space
https://ninjastic.space/post/60664453
https://ninjastic.space/post/60624614
https://ninjastic.space/post/60624613
https://ninjastic.space/post/60624603
https://ninjastic.space/post/60624601



if you search for more accounts in that campaign, more accounts may have a habit of tagging posts like that.
I'm not saying that's solid evidence to accuse them of being multiple accounts. but, everything looks the same.

[Awaklara]

I once reminded someone who applied for the 1xbit signature campaign. I don't think the owner of the account knows more about the reputation of the 1xbit campaign and the effect it will have on promoting the campaign. Due to their ignorance, I think it is necessary to be reminded to remove the signature code before the account owner is marked.

now the account you warned about the reputation of 1xbit re-registers the campaign and wears the 1xbit signature.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.msg61111461#msg61111461

Now I doubt he doesn't know what the consequences will be if he signed up for the 1xbit campaign as you warned. will you remind him a second time?

it seems that many people have a dark eye for money. it doesn't matter if he joins the campaign or not. after he was warned he did not heed the warning. I think the account supports casino scams. worth tagging.

[UmerIdrees]

I once reminded someone who applied for the 1xbit signature campaign. I don't think the owner of the account knows more about the reputation of the 1xbit campaign and the effect it will have on promoting the campaign. Due to their ignorance, I think it is necessary to be reminded to remove the signature code before the account owner is marked.

now the account you warned about the reputation of 1xbit re-registers the campaign and wears the 1xbit signature.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.msg61111461#msg61111461

Now I doubt he doesn't know what the consequences will be if he signed up for the 1xbit campaign as you warned. will you remind him a second time?

it seems that many people have a dark eye for money. it doesn't matter if he joins the campaign or not. after he was warned he did not heed the warning. I think the account supports casino scams. worth tagging.

Some people know that they will be tagged but they still try to join this 1xbit campaign as they are not being accepted else where. They think that some bucks are better than no bucks at all. They only think short term as in the long term if he/she keeps posting, ranks up and may get in some better campaign.
But if they apply or join 1xbit they will just ruin their account forever and also promoting a scam is doing a scam itself. There is no cure for greediness  

[Ultegra134]

Excuse me but I'm on my phone again and could only take screenshots. 1xbit's spammers are on it again, making irrelevant one liner posts which all look alike. I wouldn't be surprised if they were all created by the same person, using alt accounts. After all, 1xbit accepts all kind of users. Not sure if they were edited out, but the majority of latest posts in the Economy section are made by these spammers.