Helping others could help to improve our country's economy

[Russlenat]

Whenever there is a topic about this case and people are discussing how to help other people they start talking about how to give free food, clothes, or money to their people when the topic is brought up. In my opinion, this is not a good thing to do because even if you gave them free food and clothes for years, they would still need these things afterward, I would prefer to assist other people living in my country by teaching them about the economy and how to invest and a new technology that can be used to earn money. As a result, they will not need my help anymore in the future and will be able to meet all their needs independently.

Sometimes, it's easier to just give them free food and money because we tend to think that its currently what they mostly need that time. When in fact, we are tolerating some of those lazy people not to work knowing we can help them anytime. If only the government are able to provide more jobs and investment opportunities to these poor people, then we can't no longer see people living in the streets and asking for food or money. However, if we have also the means to give, then for sure it will be a great help for them too.

[1714094487]

1714094487

[1714094487]

1714094487

[1714094487]

1714094487

[Zilon]

Conclusion
Let's all try our best to help someone during this rising inflation. Bringing someone out of poverty may serve the chance of him/her helping another thousands of people. This can thereby help indirectly to eradicate poverty to certain level within the society. Helping someone may come in the following ways:

👉👉By giving money, foods, clothes etc.
👉👉Teaching them what to do to earn little more money.
👉👉By giving reasonable advice.
👉👉By creating more jobs....and many more.

Let's all join hand together for the growth of our country and for the betterment of the world.

Helping with funds is very important but its most beneficial to those with a rich mindset. Poverty is the state of the mind. A society where money is constantly shared hardly grows with exception to the class of senior citizens.  Creating jobs too slow down economic growth. The best option is to help expose people to new technologies and trending opportunities both on the cloud and on physical space. The era of creating menial jobs is gradually fading off because Ai is gradually replacing human efforts

[lionheart78]

👉👉By creating more jobs....and many more.

Let's all join hand together for the growth of our country and for the betterment of the world.

Creating jobs will be the best solution to this problem.  This way people will have a continuous source of income thus saving other people from spending extra just to help others in need.  Giving food is just a temporary band-aid for the problem while teaching them what to do to earn money can't do anything if the jobs aren't available. Establishing a business still needs money for start-up so the advice of having a business when a person is struggling with finances won't do anything.

[Rengga Jati]

----
👉👉feeding their families and medicines.
👉👉having a roof over their heads or food in their bellies.
👉👉Paying school fee or learning a handwork.
---

Sharing is caring, for whoever, for our families, relations, and also other people. Caring and sharing will really help other people to have better conditions at that time.
However, should we help them fully moreover by feeding them fully and also helping them with all things?
I am not sure that the term caring is full to help them. This will also depend on who the person or people that we help.
If we consider that they deserve it because they really cannot work a job because of the elderly, the sick, the disabled, we may be suitable to help them continuously.
But, if we consider that they are still able to work, it is better to know to what limit we can help. We don't only help by feeding them or giving them only to life, but we can support them to be able to work, asking them to work in certain things, work in your business, work in some vocation, and others. But you must also tell them about professionalism if they are working with you. This does not mean that we do not care about them, but rather to help them so that they are not dependent on other people's gifts, while they are really still able to work, so don't make them lazy to work. One way is to encourage them to want to work, perhaps by providing jobs or helping them find work.

[arwin100]

👉👉By creating more jobs....and many more.

Let's all join hand together for the growth of our country and for the betterment of the world.

Creating jobs will be the best solution to this problem.  This way people will have a continuous source of income thus saving other people from spending extra just to help others in need.  Giving food is just a temporary band-aid for the problem while teaching them what to do to earn money can't do anything if the jobs aren't available. Establishing a business still needs money for start-up so the advice of having a business when a person is struggling with finances won't do anything.

This is more reliable on how to help the economic growth on their country since by helping other to have a job is really sustainable for long term since they could provide something useful like products or certain goods that can help the government to gain taxes. I really don't agree about giving free food and money because this is not the best solution you can give to a person since this cannot create any productive life to them.

[Zilon]

This is more reliable on how to help the economic growth on their country since by helping other to have a job is really sustainable for long term since they could provide something useful like products or certain goods that can help the government to gain taxes. I really don't agree about giving free food and money because this is not the best solution you can give to a person since this cannot create any productive life to them.

Job creation can grow the economy of a nation but to what extent can it sustain the economic growth of that country. Jobs are short term solution to a long term problem.  To sustain an economy then embracing innovations by investing in young minds on trending technologies and new approach to economic challenges can serve down to many generations. I see job creation as a means to satisfying the immediate need of a country and not a long term solution

[Wawa2013]

Whenever there is a topic about this case and people are discussing how to help other people they start talking about how to give free food, clothes, or money to their people when the topic is brought up. In my opinion, this is not a good thing to do because even if you gave them free food and clothes for years, they would still need these things afterward, I would prefer to assist other people living in my country by teaching them about the economy and how to invest and a new technology that can be used to earn money. As a result, they will not need my help anymore in the future and will be able to meet all their needs independently.

Sometimes, it's easier to just give them free food and money because we tend to think that its currently what they mostly need that time. When in fact, we are tolerating some of those lazy people not to work knowing we can help them anytime. If only the government are able to provide more jobs and investment opportunities to these poor people, then we can't no longer see people living in the streets and asking for food or money. However, if we have also the means to give, then for sure it will be a great help for them too.

That's why I'm one of those people who don't agree with the government's policy of printing a lot of fiat to give to the poor. This will not improve
the economy, but will create new problems in the future with a much higher rate of rising inflation. We should also if we want to help the poor around us,
don't focus too much on providing free food and money. But it's best to educate them on how to make money, such as teaching them how to promote
goods for them to sell. Therefore, I prefer if the government provides free training to develop skills for the poor rather than providing financial assistance.
So we can also help the government help the poor, by at least helping our friends and family who do not have an income by teaching them how the skills
we have. So that they can make money and not beg for food or money.

[odunybiz]

Not to be pessimistic, but these factors wouldn't improve an entire country's economy unless you're talking about a massive overhaul of governmental systems.

Helping others may not improve the whole entire country's economy as you said but will till have some great impart on the country. A simple job created may help to solve unemployment issue of some people, enabling them to feed themselves and their family. In some countries, people are dying due to lack of food. Helping such people may help to reduce morality in the country and such people may later be of advantage to the country. Either directly or indirectly, this still have effect on the country's economy.

[Cookdata]

Let's all join hand together for the growth of our country and for the betterment of the world.

Actually, this is why we have governments and this is why we have leaders in every country. We have them from the Presidency to the least in power but you know, in failed countries of developing and underdevelop, these hardly work but developed countries do try their best in handling those above problems, it not necessary that the middle and rich folks have to try to do that, there is money set aside during yearly budget padding to tackle these during emergencies.

Where the rich people who have good hearts come from are always the Non-government organizations(NGOs) but they are very limited with resources because the amount they do have to help is not always enough to go around, they can only do the one they can to help others

[Silberman]

Too utopian a topic. It is relevant, not only in our time. Kind hearts always help, and assistance to the lower strata of the population should be at the level of the government. But what do we see in reality? During a crisis, there are always those who get richer; these are, of course, rich people, and the poor get poorer. 
Watching the news, I do not see any attempts to help people who are in need; today, the world has become very evil. Of course, helping one person can make him happier, but today poverty is a global problem. And talking about small steps to help in this forum won't really change anything.

The problem is too big to be solved by a single person, and not only that people can see that whatever it's coming next for the economy is not going to be good, this means that even if they want to help many people are going to get worried about their own well-being and this means they will be less willing to share whatever they could offer because they do not know if in just a few months or years they are going to need that money, so definitely the circumstances we are going through are making the problem of poverty even worse for everyone.

[Raflesia]

The problem is too big to be solved by a single person, and not only that people can see that whatever it's coming next for the economy is not going to be good, this means that even if they want to help many people are going to get worried about their own well-being and this means they will be less willing to share whatever they could offer because they do not know if in just a few months or years they are going to need that money, so definitely the circumstances we are going through are making the problem of poverty even worse for everyone.

On the other hand this will also be like a double-edged sword, giving help to those in need is indeed good enough to do but on the other hand when this becomes a habit it makes the person we help become like comfort and continues to do what he was doing and never changes because indeed they knew that more and more help would come their way.
I think giving necessary assistance is a good thing but compared to material assistance I prefer to give some needy people in my area the opportunity to start something that makes them grow in the hope that they will be able to do business or do work that can support their lives .

[boris singer]

Helping is really a good act of showing kindness especially now that we're in the midst of a crisis but this won't solve the problem permanently. It will only provide a temporary solution to solve hunger and poverty for a short period but we should admit that we aren't capable of sustaining them for life. It will be better to help them find ways and opportunities to survive so they will know how to grind and earn their own money. We should teach them how to catch fish than feeding them all the time.

In this case the focus is to ease because when we can't provide something more like capital and opportunities to work, then at least help reduce the burden of their lives this is a pretty good thing.
Indeed, in this case what you say is true but on the other hand we are also in trouble what we can do with it.
At least giving help only once is better than waiting for us to be able to provide help in other forms.

[Solosanz]

The problem is too big to be solved by a single person, and not only that people can see that whatever it's coming next for the economy is not going to be good, this means that even if they want to help many people are going to get worried about their own well-being and this means they will be less willing to share whatever they could offer because they do not know if in just a few months or years they are going to need that money, so definitely the circumstances we are going through are making the problem of poverty even worse for everyone.

A single richest person e.g. Elon Musk might able to help every poor people in this world, but the question is, he want or not? look at the current situation, he's not helping the whole poor people with his money, of course it's his right and he doesn't have any obligation for doing this. But I think it's not good to give them fish everyday, it's better to teach them how to fishing yourself, so he can get fish without someone giving it. The main problem of poor people is they're not force themselves to become better and start doing anything to earn money.

[lionheart78]

This is more reliable on how to help the economic growth on their country since by helping other to have a job is really sustainable for long term since they could provide something useful like products or certain goods that can help the government to gain taxes. I really don't agree about giving free food and money because this is not the best solution you can give to a person since this cannot create any productive life to them.

Job creation can grow the economy of a nation but to what extent can it sustain the economic growth of that country. Jobs are short term solution to a long term problem.  To sustain an economy then embracing innovations by investing in young minds on trending technologies and new approach to economic challenges can serve down to many generations. I see job creation as a means to satisfying the immediate need of a country and not a long term solution

Doesn't investing in innovation and technology create more jobs?  Between the options given by OP, creating jobs is the one for the long term.  It is a given that the government must educate the next generation. But without the availability of jobs where these young minds have to get their initial financial support to move on to the next stage where they can showcase their talent and learnings, all this knowledge will likely go to waste.  Job is there to establish a financial foundation for whatever a person needs to do next.

[BRINIRHA]

I don't have much but i do give to the less privilege in my area and some family members that am better off. The cost of living as a result of high inflation rate has made it very difficult for most low income earners to sustain themselves.
This is the time to give a helping hand no matter how little it is because it will be of benefit to the recipient.

correctly. the slightest help will be very valuable if it is received by people who really need help. and when the crisis hit the whole world, it was people from the lower middle economy who became the real victims. especially those who really have the lowest economic level. many of them even find it difficult to just eat. more of those who always hold Hungry. they really need a helping hand. somehow help from the government can't seem to reach them. so we can't rely too much on the government. because the government cannot touch all corners of society. because the government also has limitations. so it is we who are closest who must work hand in hand, help each other to relieve the suffering of the people who are under us in terms of economy. so that there is cooperation between the government and the people. and it can have an indirect impact on the economic recovery of a country.

[Hispo]

-snip-

-snip-

-snip-

-snip-

Easier said than done when comes to teach someone how to be more self-sufficient. Some do not even want to.
It can be more useful but it requires more time and energy in order to reach objectives, when comes to charity for example one could consider it as a "relief" to problems a person could be going through, which is better than nothing, isnt it?

It is when a person in need knocks on the door asking for food, how would I teach them how to work for their food?. A perfect stranger I have never seen before.
So even though I understand that teaching people rather than giving away resources is important but it is something that needs organization and even infrastructure, as far as I am concerned.

[Silberman]

The problem is too big to be solved by a single person, and not only that people can see that whatever it's coming next for the economy is not going to be good, this means that even if they want to help many people are going to get worried about their own well-being and this means they will be less willing to share whatever they could offer because they do not know if in just a few months or years they are going to need that money, so definitely the circumstances we are going through are making the problem of poverty even worse for everyone.

A single richest person e.g. Elon Musk might able to help every poor people in this world, but the question is, he want or not? look at the current situation, he's not helping the whole poor people with his money, of course it's his right and he doesn't have any obligation for doing this. But I think it's not good to give them fish everyday, it's better to teach them how to fishing yourself, so he can get fish without someone giving it. The main problem of poor people is they're not force themselves to become better and start doing anything to earn money.

Could someone like Elon make a difference in the life of many people if he decided to do it? Of course, but not even a person like him can help everyone since even if his resources are many times greater than what we have they are still not infinite and the problem of poverty is simply too big to fix, now an attempt must always be done to try to reduce the number of people living in poverty as much as possible, but since this is a problem that has existed probably since the beginning of civilization itself it is difficult to see how it is ever going to be fixed.

[livingfree]

I am doing my part on this one, some of my relatives, I'm not giving them food but I'm giving them advises on which career path that they should go.

Those that are into technology, they can adapt things that are currently the trend at the moment. And those that are still young, I'm telling them that they should learn to think outside box and not just all about school because after they study, they need to work or make their own business if they can have.

I have no problem on giving people something to eat but it will be based on the situation that they are at. If they have the capacity to work, they just need a helping hand at the moment but we won't be feeding them forever. That's why there's the quote about teaching them how to fish and not giving them the fish.

[bakasabo]

I feel like this topic is partly related to Ukrainian refugees. I see a lot of countries are helping them, a lot of refugees are trying find work or already working, but some part of them can not work or dont want or plan to. Some of them just wait abroad until war ends and plan to return home. How can they improve economy of my country? Ok, I accept that this might be a bad example, but what about refugees that face language barrier at work? They will to work, but they are not accepted. Or accepted, but company spend time and money on teaching them. How can this help to improve economy? Even in my life, every time I try to help someone, it ends with him sitting on my neck or expecting me to work or do extra, so that I have time and funds for him.

[Natalim]

I'd see this as a noble act but this won't make help the economy to grow.
Helping each other was just temporary, we can't expect someone to feed us and gives us shelter forever, we have to work hard as well so we can provide for our necessities. 

Putting as an example what happens to those who are affected by the war. Some of their people leaving out from that place in order to find peace and a better life because nothing really happens on us if we are still dependent on help from others.