🪄 arcanebet.com 🪄 Your new favourite Crypto Casino 🎲

[abel1337]

On a completely different note, are you (reader), willing to perform KYC when being offered an appealing bonus? For example, a deposit bonus with fair rollover/wager terms. One of the main reasons attractive deposit bonuses are not common in the crypto space is that they are highly abusable when no KYC is required. It would be great to hear your opinions.

This is a great question. It's easy to see why you ask it, of course... As far as the research I have done, the majority of players in the crypto space is concerned, KYC is either extremely unpopular or dead on arrival. KYC procedures can help prevent abuse, but they are no silver bullet. However, legal compliance has its requirements as well.

With that said, money talks, after all; so if people see that something is valuable and desirable, they could be willing to go through KYC (if it's easy and not intrusive) for the chance at a reward. I don't think many of the players will see it as a downside.

Yes, I'm willing to pass identity verification (KYC) if I'm offered an appealing bonus with fair rollover/wager requirements.

KYC is needed by the casino for them not to be abused but at the same time, There are gamblers who are not willing to do a KYC. This is why there are some casinos are offering bonuses or doing promotion on gamblers who are willing to abide KYC.

Though, I think leaving an option for gamblers who don't want to do KYC is for me a good thing. There are many gamblers who don't want to do a KYC and many casinos now are requiring their players to do KYC, This could potentially increase their player traffic.

NO KYC = NO BONUS, KYC =  BONUS. Gamblers need some options.

[ethereumhunter]

On a completely different note, are you (reader), willing to perform KYC when being offered an appealing bonus? For example, a deposit bonus with fair rollover/wager terms. One of the main reasons attractive deposit bonuses are not common in the crypto space is that they are highly abusable when no KYC is required. It would be great to hear your opinions.

This is a great question. It's easy to see why you ask it, of course... As far as the research I have done, the majority of players in the crypto space is concerned, KYC is either extremely unpopular or dead on arrival. KYC procedures can help prevent abuse, but they are no silver bullet. However, legal compliance has its requirements as well.

With that said, money talks, after all; so if people see that something is valuable and desirable, they could be willing to go through KYC (if it's easy and not intrusive) for the chance at a reward. I don't think many of the players will see it as a downside.

Yes, I'm willing to pass identity verification (KYC) if I'm offered an appealing bonus with fair rollover/wager requirements.

KYC is needed by the casino for them not to be abused but at the same time, There are gamblers who are not willing to do a KYC. This is why there are some casinos are offering bonuses or doing promotion on gamblers who are willing to abide KYC.

Though, I think leaving an option for gamblers who don't want to do KYC is for me a good thing. There are many gamblers who don't want to do a KYC and many casinos now are requiring their players to do KYC, This could potentially increase their player traffic.

NO KYC = NO BONUS, KYC =  BONUS. Gamblers need some options.

Maybe if a gambler doesn't want to do KYC and accepts that he won't get any bonuses, will he later be forced to do KYC if one day he can win a lot of money and wants to withdraw the money? Because this can cause grief that the gambler will experience because he is not interested in doing KYC and as long as he is playing, he is not cheating.

And I think some crypto gamblers don't really want to do KYC, although others are okay if they do KYC.

[logfiles]

KYC is needed by the casino for them not to be abused but at the same time, There are gamblers who are not willing to do a KYC. This is why there are some casinos are offering bonuses or doing promotion on gamblers who are willing to abide KYC.

Though, I think leaving an option for gamblers who don't want to do KYC is for me a good thing. There are many gamblers who don't want to do a KYC and many casinos now are requiring their players to do KYC, This could potentially increase their player traffic.

NO KYC = NO BONUS, KYC =  BONUS. Gamblers need some options.

We all know this is not possible, especially if the casino is regulated. They will be force to have an AML policy and this will always ensure KYC verification is enforced where necessary. You do know that services that don't require KYC are always at a risk of being used to launder funds from suspicious sources.

I personally hate KYC too, but you would have to understand the position in which some of these services are in.

[Marvelman]

/../
NO KYC = NO BONUS, KYC =  BONUS. Gamblers need some options.

We all know this is not possible, especially if the casino is regulated. They will be force to have an AML policy and this will always ensure KYC verification is enforced where necessary. You do know that services that don't require KYC are always at a risk of being used to launder funds from suspicious sources.

I personally hate KYC too, but you would have to understand the position in which some of these services are in.

I agree with you. We've recently seen an increase in queries relating to the topic of KYC and why some platforms require it and others do not. As far as I can tell, some gamblers strongly oppose KYC, while others agree that it is necessary to have KYC on regulated platforms, but are willing to provide their personal information only to reputable platforms.

arcanebetcasino, I think that's a good idea. If KYC already has to be done on the platform, then an offer of a good bonus is an additional incentive for people who are still undecided. However, as someone already mentioned, this strategy will succeed only if you offer a really good bonus.

[Bitinity]

On a completely different note, are you (reader), willing to perform KYC when being offered an appealing bonus? For example, a deposit bonus with fair rollover/wager terms. One of the main reasons attractive deposit bonuses are not common in the crypto space is that they are highly abusable when no KYC is required. It would be great to hear your opinions.

This is a great question. It's easy to see why you ask it, of course... As far as the research I have done, the majority of players in the crypto space is concerned, KYC is either extremely unpopular or dead on arrival. KYC procedures can help prevent abuse, but they are no silver bullet. However, legal compliance has its requirements as well.

With that said, money talks, after all; so if people see that something is valuable and desirable, they could be willing to go through KYC (if it's easy and not intrusive) for the chance at a reward. I don't think many of the players will see it as a downside.

Yes, I'm willing to pass identity verification (KYC) if I'm offered an appealing bonus with fair rollover/wager requirements.

My privacy for bonus with wagering requirement? I will not be willing to reveal my document for such bonus obviously. Of course it is all about preferences, but for me it does not make senses to pass KYC just because of bonuses with wagering requirement. I will prefer to pass KYC when I win huge amount only as it can be something worth for me, but for bonuses with no guaranteed value? I will never do it.

[decodx]

My privacy for bonus with wagering requirement? I will not be willing to reveal my document for such bonus obviously. Of course it is all about preferences, but for me it does not make senses to pass KYC just because of bonuses with wagering requirement. I will prefer to pass KYC when I win huge amount only as it can be something worth for me, but for bonuses with no guaranteed value? I will never do it.

I understand what you're saying. There's no denying that majority of crypto users do not like KYC on any platform, least of all on an online casino. I agree that people hate it, but we also have to understand that it's a necessary evil. Many gambling platforms already require some form of verification due to legal regulations and the KYC has been the price you pay for compliance. But, if casino sites want to attract more players, the best thing they can do is to add bonuses that are designed to help newcomers enter the game. After all, even if we don't like KYC, we accept it since it is the price we have to pay to use the platform. Why not give newcomers some benefit for their compliance, such as bonuses to make the experience more fun?

There has already been a suggestion that it would probably be best approach for the casino to give players the option of filling out KYC details (with the welcome bonus) or requiring KYC only when withdrawing larger amounts.

[goldkingcoiner]

On a completely different note, are you (reader), willing to perform KYC when being offered an appealing bonus? For example, a deposit bonus with fair rollover/wager terms. One of the main reasons attractive deposit bonuses are not common in the crypto space is that they are highly abusable when no KYC is required. It would be great to hear your opinions.

KYC wont really be necessary if we do speak or talk about bonuses and it wont really be that prone to abuse as long  you do set out specific rules or terms.There might be some lessening of some terms
so that people would find it interesting but you shouldnt forget that this would be strictly 1 person per 1 IP.I dont really see any possible ways for it to be abused since this is mostly the case
where bonuses been abused if there would be no limitations per user on certain household or IP.We've seen some sites do being wrecked just because they had forgotten to set
these common specific rules.

KYC has its reasons. From a legal and technical standpoint is serves to protect both the rights and lawful regulational activities of online gambling casinos as well as the rights and freedoms of individual players/customers/clients. So saying that KYC won't really be necessary without viewing the legal requirements and the technical security perspective is a bit irresponsible. And I would never recommend going such a path. Especially if you put in a lot of hard work to create and run your own online gambling casino.

As far as IPs go, without KYC you can expect people to change their IPs and register multiple accounts with which they can cheat the casino out of bonuses and other things. Its also not a good idea to leave out KYC because of this.

[Eureka_07]

After playing a little in the demo version of slots, it seemed to me or maybe just lucky this time that the most attractive slot seemed to be "Chilli heat megaways" from the provider pragmatic, but I can be wrong of course it takes a long time to try out all the slots.
<snip>

If you are into slot, then I would suggest you to try playing Pragmatic Play games and Hacksaw Gaming slots. Almost all of their games are really fun to play. What I like about their games are the stand-out concepts in music, theme, and VFX.
Also for slots that has different versions such as "megaways", most of the time I chose to play those games as it gives different taste of the classic (first) version of the game.

[lionheart78]

From a legal standpoint, offering bonuses just to perform KYC is a generous act from the Casino.  In case the KYC requirement is pushed strictly by the authority, Casino doesn't need any promotion or bonuses to their player just to perform KYC,  but in the current situation where there are still many casinos that offer non-KYC requirement, this offer actually looks unattractive because those who value privacy will just play on that casino.  So I don't think offering a good promotion or bonus just to do KYC won't have success in the current situation of Casino KYC requirements for those who weigh privacy more than the amount they can possibly get.

As far as IPs go, without KYC you can expect people to change their IPs and register multiple accounts with which they can cheat the casino out of bonuses and other things. Its also not a good idea to leave out KYC because of this.

Indeed, this kind of security method is just a kid's trick for the veteran bonus exploiters.

[peter0425]

After playing a little in the demo version of slots, it seemed to me or maybe just lucky this time that the most attractive slot seemed to be "Chilli heat megaways" from the provider pragmatic, but I can be wrong of course it takes a long time to try out all the slots.

then congratulations mate then you'll maybe vouching for them now lol  


anyway Have not tried this site yet but willing to check if they are really worth trusting because I am a  player that hates playing in not so trusted gambling site.


__________________________________________

Welcome to the team and this site and hopes this brings good to the players (like me ) of Bitcointalk.org .

[LUCKMCFLY]

Well welcome to Bitcointalk,

It should be noted that the casino is very fast, its environment is very good and it has very good slots, honestly I like the ones with Zeus of Pragmatic Play origin, but take a quick look at all its casino, it has very good deposit options , and when reviewing the withdrawal option, they seem to be quite demanding with the KYC documents, I have not bothered to do the KYC, but they are usually very strict about them? I know that now it is very common for casinos to require KYC for everything, for withdrawals, I see it as something normal, do you plan to do some kind of promotion for bitcointalk members? something like that?

[Daltonik]

On a completely different note, are you (reader), willing to perform KYC when being offered an appealing bonus? For example, a deposit bonus with fair rollover/wager terms. One of the main reasons attractive deposit bonuses are not common in the crypto space is that they are highly abusable when no KYC is required. It would be great to hear your opinions.

This is a great question. It's easy to see why you ask it, of course... As far as the research I have done, the majority of players in the crypto space is concerned, KYC is either extremely unpopular or dead on arrival. KYC procedures can help prevent abuse, but they are no silver bullet. However, legal compliance has its requirements as well.

With that said, money talks, after all; so if people see that something is valuable and desirable, they could be willing to go through KYC (if it's easy and not intrusive) for the chance at a reward. I don't think many of the players will see it as a downside.

Yes, I'm willing to pass identity verification (KYC) if I'm offered an appealing bonus with fair rollover/wager requirements.

KYC is needed by the casino for them not to be abused but at the same time, There are gamblers who are not willing to do a KYC. This is why there are some casinos are offering bonuses or doing promotion on gamblers who are willing to abide KYC.

Though, I think leaving an option for gamblers who don't want to do KYC is for me a good thing. There are many gamblers who don't want to do a KYC and many casinos now are requiring their players to do KYC, This could potentially increase their player traffic.

NO KYC = NO BONUS, KYC =  BONUS. Gamblers need some options.

Yes, it is, however, according to paragraph # 7 of their Terms & Conditions, during the verification of your verification data during the KYC, the withdrawal of funds will be blocked, and if for some reason you have not passed the verification procedure, then your deposits and winnings will not be returned to you. Thus, before making a deposit, it is better to go through KYC first if you are serious about playing at arcanebet online casino, so Failed KYC= Loss of deposit and wins.

[Daltonik]

Gamblers should make a habit of reading the ToS before trying a new platform especially if they are against the KYC rules.

Gamblers barely does unless they are a high roller/gambler. I also don't read ToS while signing up on a casino though I don't join a lot of sites frequently, even if I do, I join only for test with small balance.
Having a confirmation message where user will know that KYC is forced, will increase the trustworthiness of the casino in my opinion.

It's okay if they don't read it but they must face the consequences of doing so because I noticed that many of these lazy gamblers still complains right after they are being requested by a KYC upon withdrawing their funds when it was their own fault in the first place. They just accept the terms without knowing what is written on it but for the high rollers and big bettors, I believe that they are professionals and that is why they became wealthy.

They always read the rules of the site so that they won't end up in a sticky situation because big amounts are at stake whenever they play gambling. Each gambling site should also make the rules more transparent and should make a notice if there are any changes so that they won't be blamed as well.

Yes, you are right, it is always better to carefully read the TaC online casino before you are going to make a deposit to avoid the consequences if you need to withdraw funds, you can also be blocked if your country is in the prohibited section and you are trying to pass KYC using a VPN.

[arcanebetcasino]

On top of this, your sessions with us are automatically rewarded by our progressive loyalty system and complemented by a dedicated VIP manager once you reach a certain level.
We’re super excited about entering the crypto space. We will remain close to our players to optimize our services based on their feedback and ensure we provide the best playing experience possible.

Hello OP, welcome to this forum; I just checked the details provided by you, seems to be pretty interesting. I hope this can attract more new users and benefit all the users with a better experience. It's good that you offer eight different cryptocurrencies, but I would recommend adding FIAT. However, good luck.

Hey @worldofcoins,

Thank you for welcoming us to the forum! We're very happy to be here. We have started off as a FIAT casino, and still are. However, as of very recently we have introduced several Cryptocurrencies to our casino and therefore we are now offering our services to Crypto players as well. FIAT players are however still very welcome and we have a variance of payment methods available for each region!

Maurits
Team arcanebet

[LUCKMCFLY]

On a completely different note, are you (reader), willing to perform KYC when being offered an appealing bonus? For example, a deposit bonus with fair rollover/wager terms. One of the main reasons attractive deposit bonuses are not common in the crypto space is that they are highly abusable when no KYC is required. It would be great to hear your opinions.

This is a great question. It's easy to see why you ask it, of course... As far as the research I have done, the majority of players in the crypto space is concerned, KYC is either extremely unpopular or dead on arrival. KYC procedures can help prevent abuse, but they are no silver bullet. However, legal compliance has its requirements as well.

With that said, money talks, after all; so if people see that something is valuable and desirable, they could be willing to go through KYC (if it's easy and not intrusive) for the chance at a reward. I don't think many of the players will see it as a downside.

Yes, I'm willing to pass identity verification (KYC) if I'm offered an appealing bonus with fair rollover/wager requirements.

My privacy for bonus with wagering requirement? I will not be willing to reveal my document for such bonus obviously. Of course it is all about preferences, but for me it does not make senses to pass KYC just because of bonuses with wagering requirement. I will prefer to pass KYC when I win huge amount only as it can be something worth for me, but for bonuses with no guaranteed value? I will never do it.

I think that for unsecured bonds the issue of complying with KYC is not very necessary, according to what I have read, or maybe there is something that I am missing? In most casinos I have seen that there are some problems due to the KYC requirements, there are even many people who are afraid of leaking their private data, and if it is dangerous, but, unfortunately, there is something that we have to get used to, if we want to be in the best casinos, we must comply with the KYC requirements, because it is a requirement and I see that this is becoming universal, and I think that the greatest obligation is that it be to make withdrawals, because it is the option that forces anyone to comply .

[decodx]

On a completely different note, are you (reader), willing to perform KYC when being offered an appealing bonus? For example, a deposit bonus with fair rollover/wager terms. One of the main reasons attractive deposit bonuses are not common in the crypto space is that they are highly abusable when no KYC is required. It would be great to hear your opinions.

This is a great question. It's easy to see why you ask it, of course... As far as the research I have done, the majority of players in the crypto space is concerned, KYC is either extremely unpopular or dead on arrival. KYC procedures can help prevent abuse, but they are no silver bullet. However, legal compliance has its requirements as well.

With that said, money talks, after all; so if people see that something is valuable and desirable, they could be willing to go through KYC (if it's easy and not intrusive) for the chance at a reward. I don't think many of the players will see it as a downside.

Yes, I'm willing to pass identity verification (KYC) if I'm offered an appealing bonus with fair rollover/wager requirements.

My privacy for bonus with wagering requirement? I will not be willing to reveal my document for such bonus obviously. Of course it is all about preferences, but for me it does not make senses to pass KYC just because of bonuses with wagering requirement. I will prefer to pass KYC when I win huge amount only as it can be something worth for me, but for bonuses with no guaranteed value? I will never do it.

I think that for unsecured bonds the issue of complying with KYC is not very necessary, according to what I have read, or maybe there is something that I am missing? In most casinos I have seen that there are some problems due to the KYC requirements, there are even many people who are afraid of leaking their private data, and if it is dangerous, but, unfortunately, there is something that we have to get used to, if we want to be in the best casinos, we must comply with the KYC requirements, because it is a requirement and I see that this is becoming universal, and I think that the greatest obligation is that it be to make withdrawals, because it is the option that forces anyone to comply .

There is no doubt about it, most regulated casinos will require KYC from their customers at one point or another. There is no exception for a crypto-currency casino, most of them require you to sign up with your personal and financial information.

But the question was whether you would be more willing to part with personal information if you were offered a certain bonus for that? At least that's what arcanebetcasino suggested, because it would also reduce the possibility of bonus abuse by bad players.

[arcanebetcasino]

We've got a question for the community! Which one of the below listed providers is your favourite, and why?

[Strongkored]

@arcanebetcasino, Do you want to hold a promotion from one of these providers?, so ask which is the favorite from member of this forum
I'm sure the answer will be different because everyone has their own preferences and sometimes there is a provider that blocks certain areas so players will prefer the other.
Tebakan saya akan banyak yang memilih A & B but my favorite is not in the list above because I play pragmatic providers, A & B only occasionally while C & D has never played it.

[fathafraink]

There is an answer (from the customer service of the site I mentioned in this) that I think is quite necessary for someone who has the same thing as me. And I think this needs to be input for this site. The questions and answers that I mean are in the picture, at the link below. About welcome bonus for first deposit.

https://ibb.co/HCj59d6

[logfiles]

There is an answer (from the customer service of the site I mentioned in this) that I think is quite necessary for someone who has the same thing as me. And I think this needs to be input for this site. The questions and answers that I mean are in the picture, at the link below. About welcome bonus for first deposit.

https://ibb.co/HCj59d6

You should have just quoted the text instead of posting the screenshot because once your reply is buried under so many replies, One won't be able to search up your query or the reply using keywords such as "Bonus"