Going to war means let's ulter the economic progression

[Argoo]

I think they should be able to make peace soon because it really affects the economy in European countries. yes, I saw several posts a few months ago showing that gas in Europe has increased several times more than before, the losers are the civilians who should not be involved in this war. I think this is a matter of the top brass, hoping that the war will end soon and the economy between the two camps will return to stability, it will make people's lives much better.

I don't think peace is in the table right now, I think that the only way that the war will stop is if Ukraine gives up the part that's already occupied or they could revoke their invitation to join NATO, Putin has a lot of resources and even with all the sanctions, in a war of attrition they will be victorious. Economy wise, I don't think we're going to see any green pastures anytime soon even if the war ended, the cost of the destruction will be of paramount importance to be addressed.

Even in Russia, propaganda channels are now calling for an urgent end to the "special operation" in Ukraine, since Russia is not able to win the war it started. In the Kremlin, as well as corrupt politicians around the world, they screamed that it was time for the parties to sit down at the negotiating table. But if the Kremlin still hopes to complete the negotiations to its advantage, then others, including China, prefer to make do with general formulations.
All this indicates that the state of affairs of Russia on the fronts of Ukraine is close to deplorable. Therefore, in Ukraine, they answered the Kremlin to silently wait for the end of the war, because they understand that any truce with Russia means the continuation of the war in the future after Russia restores its military power.

In the meantime, the invaders have something to fear. On June 4, the Armed Forces of Ukraine switched to a series of offensive operations in order to find weak points in their defense and achieved some success, breaking through the defense of the Russians in the south up to 17 kilometers deep. The Russians have already deployed about 70 percent of their reserve even for such actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which do not yet mean a general offensive. They understand that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will soon cut the existing land corridor to the Crimea, after which their defense will fall in all directions. At the same time, the invaders suffer heavy losses in manpower and equipment. Over the past 24 hours alone, according to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, more than a thousand invaders have been destroyed. We are watching the further development of the situation and the defeat of the "second army of the world."

[siniminomorocomunisakito]

The degradation of environment is also there if war happen and this is major effect on agricultural produce leading into the food shortage and insecurities around that.

It has a very broad impact. Addressing the environmental impacts of war and conflict is also critical to ensuring food security and people's well-being. I think there should be strong efforts directed at conflict prevention, peaceful resolution, and post-conflict reconstruction, with a focus on restoring agricultural systems, promoting sustainable practices, and supporting farmers in rebuilding their livelihoods. In my view, why should it be fast. pity the people there regardless of the underlying reasons, By mitigating the impact of armed conflict on the environment, we can strive for a more sustainable and food secure future.

[bayudndy]

Indeed, the consequences of war are far-reaching and affect not only the countries directly involved but also have knock-on effects that can spread across borders and impact stability and prosperity. prosperity of the whole world. While hoping and praying for an end to conflict is a natural response, governments, international organizations, and individuals also need to actively work towards peaceful solutions and support initiatives. promote peace-building, reconciliation, and sustainable development. Remember to prioritize peace, diplomacy, and conflict resolution to avoid the devastating consequences that accompany armed conflict. International cooperation, dialogue, and the promotion of peaceful solutions to disputes are vital to maintaining global economic progress and stability.

[RockBell]

The degradation of environment is also there if war happen and this is major effect on agricultural produce leading into the food shortage and insecurities around that.

It has a very broad impact. Addressing the environmental impacts of war and conflict is also critical to ensuring food security and people's well-being. I think there should be strong efforts directed at conflict prevention, peaceful resolution, and post-conflict reconstruction, with a focus on restoring agricultural systems, promoting sustainable practices, and supporting farmers in rebuilding their livelihoods. In my view, why should it be fast. pity the people there regardless of the underlying reasons, By mitigating the impact of armed conflict on the environment, we can strive for a more sustainable and food secure future.

Food security should also be taken into account, and first and foremost, war should be avoided by all means. That is why no one was happy when Russia waged war against Ukraine let's pray that war should be avoided. In addition to the environmental impact, the mental impact is not to be overlooked because it affects a lot of people and then structures. When I read or watched a documentary about how many people died throughout world wars, I nearly broke down in tears. These countries primarily want to demonstrate who is more strong while oblivious to the repercussions.  and another impact is the economic impact after the war comes restructuring just to restore normalcy.

[DrBeer]

Indeed, the consequences of war are far-reaching and affect not only the countries directly involved but also have knock-on effects that can spread across borders and impact stability and prosperity. prosperity of the whole world. While hoping and praying for an end to conflict is a natural response, governments, international organizations, and individuals also need to actively work towards peaceful solutions and support initiatives. promote peace-building, reconciliation, and sustainable development. Remember to prioritize peace, diplomacy, and conflict resolution to avoid the devastating consequences that accompany armed conflict. International cooperation, dialogue, and the promotion of peaceful solutions to disputes are vital to maintaining global economic progress and stability.

The main nuance here is that this time, the world terrorist will not be helped by ANYONE, just as, for example, the story of the restoration of West Germany.
West Germany was needed by the Western Coalition, which defeated the Nazi regime and saved the USSR from losing and being defeated.
West Germany, the FRG, became the economic locomotive of Europe after 20 years. China will quietly and calmly return its istoric lands (beyond the Urals of modern Russia)... Other countries, taking advantage of the situation, will buy up, for pennies on the dollar, attractive investment projects in the new, free republics that seceded from Russia ...
And yes, you are right - the changes that await us in the next 3-5 years will be global...

[Argoo]

Food security should also be taken into account, and first and foremost, war should be avoided by all means. That is why no one was happy when Russia waged war against Ukraine let's pray that war should be avoided. In addition to the environmental impact, the mental impact is not to be overlooked because it affects a lot of people and then structures. When I read or watched a documentary about how many people died throughout world wars, I nearly broke down in tears. These countries primarily want to demonstrate who is more strong while oblivious to the repercussions.  and another impact is the economic impact after the war comes restructuring just to restore normalcy.

Praying that there will be no war is clearly not enough now, when the Russian invaders on the territory of Ukraine, retreating, blow up and destroy everything they can after themselves. At the same time, man-made and environmental disasters are easily created.

So, on the night of June 6, Russian invaders blew up the dam of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, as a result of which dozens of settlements in southern Ukraine were flooded, and the Kakhovka reservoir located above turns into a narrow river. At the same time, the south of Ukraine and the Crimean peninsula remain without fresh water for a long time, and the land without irrigation. Back in October, Ukraine stated at the UN that the occupiers were mining the Kakhovka HPP, but there was no reaction. I don’t even remember that they tried to pray for Ukraine and the planet as a whole. Even after the catastrophe, the invaders do not allow the UN and other international organizations to provide assistance to the population in the flooded settlements. Therefore, the corpses of the dead float between the houses and in the houses themselves, since the level of flooding often becomes five or more meters. Those civilians who try to evacuate on their own are shot in the back.

While the UN began to argue who is to blame for this situation and make stupid assumptions that the HPP could collapse itself, the invaders blew up another dam - on the Wet Yaly River in the Zaporozhye region. The rushing water is flooding settlements on both banks of the river, threatening the homes of local residents. With these attacks, Russian troops are trying to delay the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the liberation of their territories.

A very dangerous situation has now developed at the largest Zaporozhye nuclear power plant in Europe, which is also still in the hands of the Russian occupiers and which the Russians have turned into a military base. The undermining of the Kakhovskaya HPP made it very difficult for the process of cooling nuclear reactors.

After the Armed Forces of Ukraine began to successfully counterattack and broke through the Russian defenses in several directions, having already liberated seven settlements, the Russians realized that they might not be able to hold the Crimean peninsula either.
According to the intelligence of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, the Russian invaders are mining and preparing to carry out a terrorist attack at the Crimean Titan plant in occupied Armyansk in the north of Crimea. There are hundreds of tons of ammonia and other chemicals, which could cause another environmental disaster. Will we just pray, or is it time to finally act to discourage the Russians from acting like a monkey with a grenade?

[slapper]

I think they should be able to make peace soon because it really affects the economy in European countries. yes, I saw several posts a few months ago showing that gas in Europe has increased several times more than before, the losers are the civilians who should not be involved in this war. I think this is a matter of the top brass, hoping that the war will end soon and the economy between the two camps will return to stability, it will make people's lives much better.

I don't think peace is in the table right now, I think that the only way that the war will stop is if Ukraine gives up the part that's already occupied or they could revoke their invitation to join NATO, Putin has a lot of resources and even with all the sanctions, in a war of attrition they will be victorious. Economy wise, I don't think we're going to see any green pastures anytime soon even if the war ended, the cost of the destruction will be of paramount importance to be addressed.

Even in Russia, propaganda channels are now calling for an urgent end to the "special operation" in Ukraine, since Russia is not able to win the war it started. In the Kremlin, as well as corrupt politicians around the world, they screamed that it was time for the parties to sit down at the negotiating table. But if the Kremlin still hopes to complete the negotiations to its advantage, then others, including China, prefer to make do with general formulations.
All this indicates that the state of affairs of Russia on the fronts of Ukraine is close to deplorable. Therefore, in Ukraine, they answered the Kremlin to silently wait for the end of the war, because they understand that any truce with Russia means the continuation of the war in the future after Russia restores its military power.

In the meantime, the invaders have something to fear. On June 4, the Armed Forces of Ukraine switched to a series of offensive operations in order to find weak points in their defense and achieved some success, breaking through the defense of the Russians in the south up to 17 kilometers deep. The Russians have already deployed about 70 percent of their reserve even for such actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which do not yet mean a general offensive. They understand that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will soon cut the existing land corridor to the Crimea, after which their defense will fall in all directions. At the same time, the invaders suffer heavy losses in manpower and equipment. Over the past 24 hours alone, according to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, more than a thousand invaders have been destroyed. We are watching the further development of the situation and the defeat of the "second army of the world."

Should Ukraine cede its occupied territory? Heck, no! Sure, Putin's packing power, but remember, might isn't the sole deciding factor. It's about grit and guarding what's yours. Admittedly, the economy will face a storm. But isn't that freedom's price? Isn't defending justice worth an economic blow? Who says global support won't rally behind Ukraine post-crisis? Russia's prowess isn't as formidable, agreed? They're depleting reserves, losing manpower and machinery faster than restocking. The past day alone saw over a thousand invaders fall. Isn't that telling?

Just think, underdogs have their day too.

[Ozero]

Should Ukraine cede its occupied territory? Heck, no! Sure, Putin's packing power, but remember, might isn't the sole deciding factor. It's about grit and guarding what's yours. Admittedly, the economy will face a storm. But isn't that freedom's price? Isn't defending justice worth an economic blow? Who says global support won't rally behind Ukraine post-crisis? Russia's prowess isn't as formidable, agreed? They're depleting reserves, losing manpower and machinery faster than restocking. The past day alone saw over a thousand invaders fall. Isn't that telling?

Just think, underdogs have their day too.

Russian military power has shattered in an attempt to take over Ukraine. Now Russia cannot even fully defend its territory, as evidenced by the raids into the Belgorod region of the Russian Volunteer Corps. 84 percent of Ukrainians under no circumstances agree to cede any part of their territory, so the Putin regime is doomed.

Now the Armed Forces of Ukraine are conducting reconnaissance in combat in the southern and eastern directions, gradually freeing the occupied territories of Ukraine, which causes real panic among the invaders. The first line of defense of the occupiers has been quite successfully broken through. In response, the Russians deployed about 90 percent of their reserves, while the Ukrainian Armed Forces had not yet committed their main reserves to the offensive. Only three of the twelve brigades formed for such an offensive are involved. According to forecasts, at the end of June, the Russian defenses will crumble and turn into a stampede with the formation of large encirclement cauldrons for the invaders.

[Argoo]

The Russian invaders, advancing on Ukrainian cities and other settlements, methodically destroyed everything that could serve as a shelter for the Armed Forces of Ukraine and a refuge for civilians with a fire shaft. Retreating, trying to hold back the advance of the ASU, they also leave behind almost nothing but ruins.
Moreover, anticipating a military defeat in Ukraine, the Kremlin does not stop at committing large-scale environmental and man-made disasters that can cause damage not only to Ukraine, but also to the inhabitants of Russia itself and the population of other states.

So, in order to slow down the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, on the night of June 6, the Russian invaders blew up the dam of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, flooding about 80 settlements of Ukraine. The economic impact of this has yet to be assessed. But residents of many African and Asian countries will experience a significant decrease in food supplies from Ukraine.

Now the Russian invaders have mined the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, the largest in Europe. The Kremlin has already approved a plan to blow it up, and this will presumably happen after July 5, when the wind with radiation is expected to blow west towards Europe. The world has yet again practically not reacted to another possible major global catastrophe.

There has also been an increase in the movement of people and equipment near the Kursk nuclear power plant in Russia itself. Information appeared that the Russians were going to make a major accident there and blame Ukraine for this, and then, as a response, launch a nuclear strike. The Russians seem to be trying to prove how completely crazy they are. That's what the fear of a major military defeat from Ukraine does, the territory of which they tried to seize last year in a few days.

[slapper]

~snip~

When I read your comment, I become a little stiff and my eyebrows raise in a combination of fear and skepticism. The allegations are catastrophic, perhaps cataclysmic, if true. Inflicting widespread damage on civilian infrastructure, flooding inhabited areas, and (most disturbing of all) mining nuclear power stations would be a flagrant breach of international law. Still, we need to proceed with caution in this informational minefield. A canister of smoke, "(mis)information" is frequently used as a weapon of war. Is there any proof that these events actually took place? In such cases, people everywhere will need to work together to avert disaster.

It's terrifying to think that natural calamities may be used as weapons, like playing Russian roulette with Mother Nature. Any such action would have far-reaching and terrible ramifications, not only for Ukraine but for the surrounding nations and regions as well. The stereotype of Russia as a crazed country that would bite off its own tail in a fit of rage is unsettling to many people. Wisdom and impartiality are our strongest allies in times of fear and uncertainty, so keep that in mind.

[Argoo]

~snip~

When I read your comment, I become a little stiff and my eyebrows raise in a combination of fear and skepticism. The allegations are catastrophic, perhaps cataclysmic, if true. Inflicting widespread damage on civilian infrastructure, flooding inhabited areas, and (most disturbing of all) mining nuclear power stations would be a flagrant breach of international law. Still, we need to proceed with caution in this informational minefield. A canister of smoke, "(mis)information" is frequently used as a weapon of war. Is there any proof that these events actually took place? In such cases, people everywhere will need to work together to avert disaster.

It's terrifying to think that natural calamities may be used as weapons, like playing Russian roulette with Mother Nature. Any such action would have far-reaching and terrible ramifications, not only for Ukraine but for the surrounding nations and regions as well. The stereotype of Russia as a crazed country that would bite off its own tail in a fit of rage is unsettling to many people. Wisdom and impartiality are our strongest allies in times of fear and uncertainty, so keep that in mind.

If you consider Russia a civilized country, then you probably have not seen what the recently flourishing cities and other settlements in the east and south of Ukraine have turned into, where the foot of the Russian occupier set foot. Completely scorched earth with dilapidated walls of multi-storey buildings or almost complete ruins on the site of private one-story houses, as well as mass "fraternal" burials of tortured and shot civilian Ukrainians with their hands tied and with bags on their heads just because they consider themselves Ukrainians and had in home or carry Ukrainian symbols or a tattoo. Therefore, at all checkpoints, Russians undress Ukrainians to check for such tattoos or information on a mobile phone.

On June 22, the President of Ukraine Zelensky announced to the whole world about the mining of the Zaporizhzhya NPP and warned that Russia was preparing to stage a terrorist attack at the ZNPP with a release of radiation. Therefore, the president promised to transfer all available information with all confirmations to Western partners.
The head of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, also confirmed that the Zaporozhye NPP was mined along the perimeter and in some places inside the plant. This information is completely open and not hidden. What other evidence is needed to understand that the Russians have long surpassed the Nazis in their cruelty and cynicism?
Source:
https://tsn.ua/ru/ato/zaporozhskaya-aes-zaminirovana-po-perimetru-i-vnutri-v-magate-soobschili-chto-s-prudom-2355487.html

Every day in Ukraine, tens of thousands of shells, mines and rockets are fired at the front, over a thousand kilometers long, and civilians die every day. The most brutal and large-scale war since the Second World War is underway.

The Armed Forces of Ukraine are now advancing through almost continuous minefields in the flat terrain of the southern steppes of Ukraine, where the Russians have an air superiority of about ten times. Not a single offensive military doctrine in the world provides for a major offensive with such superiority in enemy aircraft. At the same time, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are gradually moving forward along the entire front and knocking out equipment, especially enemy artillery systems. For several weeks, the southern front of the Russians will inevitably crumble.

[DrBeer]

~snip~

When I read your comment, I become a little stiff and my eyebrows raise in a combination of fear and skepticism. The allegations are catastrophic, perhaps cataclysmic, if true. Inflicting widespread damage on civilian infrastructure, flooding inhabited areas, and (most disturbing of all) mining nuclear power stations would be a flagrant breach of international law. Still, we need to proceed with caution in this informational minefield. A canister of smoke, "(mis)information" is frequently used as a weapon of war. Is there any proof that these events actually took place? In such cases, people everywhere will need to work together to avert disaster.

It's terrifying to think that natural calamities may be used as weapons, like playing Russian roulette with Mother Nature. Any such action would have far-reaching and terrible ramifications, not only for Ukraine but for the surrounding nations and regions as well. The stereotype of Russia as a crazed country that would bite off its own tail in a fit of rage is unsettling to many people. Wisdom and impartiality are our strongest allies in times of fear and uncertainty, so keep that in mind.

As a resident of Ukraine, and a resident of Kiev, who met February 24 at home, and spent a lot of time in the ranks of the Territorial Defense of Kiev, I can say - it was the position "let's be careful, let's talk, let's not jump to conclusions" from 2014 that led to February 2022. It led to hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian civilians killed, tens of thousands tortured to death by the most sadistic, inhumane method, hundreds of towns and cities destroyed (destroyed in the truest sense - they simply ceased to exist forever), about 35% of the economy irreversibly destroyed, millions of migrants and refugees who lost everything in their lives - from their families to their homes and personal belongings... I saw the results of this "operation to protect the Russian-speaking population"... Blood, destruction, grief, death, death, death...

I will tell you this, the Kremlin regime is the real cancer of the modern world. And if you think that cancer can be treated by talking and expecting "what if it goes away" - then find out what a delay in active treatment of cancer means, and you will understand why you are wrong about the situation with Russia's terrorist war against Ukraine. Russia's victory is the death of the entire developed world...

[harapan]

War has a disastrous effects on people and the well-being of the nation at large.Similarly,war destroys communities,families and often disrupts the development of the social and economic efforts of nations.Putting aside the loss of human lives,the war also affects economic costs and inflation, it causes disorganization and disruption of normal economic running of the system.
 Neighbouring countries that have experienced and witnessed this clash becomes unsecured and feels unsafe in their environments.There can be better ways to resolve conflicts amongst nations but they'll choose to brutally attacked each other and wreck threatening havocs to livelihood.Preventing war is a good choice because It strengthens peace and promotes economic sustainability.

[Argoo]

War is something I don't think any individual or nation would want to be in. That's why every possible means to avoid it if possible is been sort for but, the need to exercise some form of sovereignty or be in charge of your own territory and avoid influence often makes it in editable in conflict situations and resolutions.
In war, people get to lose there homes and means of livelihood, infrastructures and civilization that took years yo build or developed is reduced to dust in minutes or hours. It's such a hard thing to take. The good thing about it is that, through all these, humanity have been seen to find a way to better ourselves.

If you look at the citizens of Russia and their behavior and statements during their war with Ukraine, it seems that your opinion that no nation wants war is very wrong.

A majority of Russians have supported the Russian invasion of Ukraine since early 2022. However, only a third of them believe that residents of the Russian Federation bear moral responsibility for the genocide of Ukrainians and the destruction caused by the Russian invasion on the territory of Ukraine. According to its results, as of January 2024, the majority of respondents (77%) support the war against Ukraine, 16% of respondents do not support it, and another 8% find it difficult to answer.
Imagine, three quarters of Russians want war and do not consider it immoral to kill women and children in Ukraine. Moreover, such a percentage within 70 exists constantly throughout the entire period of the war.

In addition, only half of those surveyed support the idea of peace negotiations, but this figure has decreased slightly compared to November last year.

66% of Russians agree that the Russian Federation is paying too high a price for participating in the war. Most often these are women, those who barely have enough to eat and those who believe that the country is moving in the wrong direction. 25% have the opposite opinion.

About 64% of Russians do not believe that the country made a mistake by starting the war, but this figure has gradually increased compared to September last year.
About 22% of respondents consider the start of the war against Ukraine a mistake. Most often these are respondents who do not support the policies of dictator Vladimir Putin (55%)
https://nv.ua/world/countries/skolko-rossiyan-podderzhivayut-voynu-protiv-ukrainy-procent-novosti-rossii-50390654.html

[Ozero]

War is something I don't think any individual or nation would want to be in. That's why every possible means to avoid it if possible is been sort for but, the need to exercise some form of sovereignty or be in charge of your own territory and avoid influence often makes it in editable in conflict situations and resolutions.
In war, people get to lose there homes and means of livelihood, infrastructures and civilization that took years yo build or developed is reduced to dust in minutes or hours. It's such a hard thing to take. The good thing about it is that, through all these, humanity have been seen to find a way to better ourselves.

If you look at the citizens of Russia and their behavior and statements during their war with Ukraine, it seems that your opinion that no nation wants war is very wrong.

A majority of Russians have supported the Russian invasion of Ukraine since early 2022. However, only a third of them believe that residents of the Russian Federation bear moral responsibility for the genocide of Ukrainians and the destruction caused by the Russian invasion on the territory of Ukraine. According to its results, as of January 2024, the majority of respondents (77%) support the war against Ukraine, 16% of respondents do not support it, and another 8% find it difficult to answer.
Imagine, three quarters of Russians want war and do not consider it immoral to kill women and children in Ukraine. Moreover, such a percentage within 70 exists constantly throughout the entire period of the war.

On March 15-17, the next presidential elections were held in Russia. And although the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation announced that 87 percent of the country’s population voted for Putin, analysts agree that the real figure is still somewhere around 47 percent. That is, almost half of the Russian population voted for the international criminal Putin, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The people of Russia continue to choose war in Ukraine and daily shelling of the territory and its settlements. Therefore, responsibility for the massacres in Ukraine lies not only with Putin and his entourage, but also with the entire Russian people.

[Bushdark]

War has a disastrous effects on people and the well-being of the nation at large.Similarly,war destroys communities,families and often disrupts the development of the social and economic efforts of nations.Putting aside the loss of human lives,the war also affects economic costs and inflation, it causes disorganization and disruption of normal economic running of the system.
 Neighbouring countries that have experienced and witnessed this clash becomes unsecured and feels unsafe in their environments.There can be better ways to resolve conflicts amongst nations but they'll choose to brutally attacked each other and wreck threatening havocs to livelihood.Preventing war is a good choice because It strengthens peace and promotes economic sustainability.

War should never be an option for any country to oblige to because the catastrophe is always unpredictable.
It is very important for the world countries to stay close to holding peace than trying to hard to make sure that problems keep coming when it supposed not to come. There are millions of reasons why we need to avoid war because the ones we are seeing in Ukraine is a typical example why we should make sure we stay out of war environment.

[|MINER|]

War never brings anything good to any country. War means destruction.  The impact of war affects the war-torn country as well as other countries associated with that country. Just as war damages the economic condition of a country, it also devastates the country.  It is better not to get involved in war. Because it creates inflation. And inflation is a curse for a country. One should maintain peace without getting involved in war.

[oktana]

It really is disastrous. Lives are very valuable but it takes more than lives because economies crumble. And it’s saddening because this could likely be an economy which has been struggling to get up, and when it’s finally up, there’s war to bring it crumbling down. People who were struggling to get their lives together suddenly become poor again. Sometimes I wonder if the people who trigger this war not consider all the suffering and negative effects before casing it.

[Iroh]

War brings chaos and destruction and death. Like the OP noted, war alters the economic and social growth of both parties involved. Even when the war clearly brings forth a victor, the victor also suffers economic consequences from the war. I wouldn’t exactly say the effects is felt more on the world than in the countries actually fighting the war.

Obviously, the impact is felt in the surrounding regions and all over. Goods and services normally produced in that region and exported to various parts of the earth would be affected, drastically reduced or even stopped. Warring parties would have to conserve resources for their own citizens as the normal rate of the production of goods and services would have been reduced.

[harapan]

War has always been associated with altered economic progression for citizens who then become victims of the harsh economic realities they will have to face as a result of crisis. But there are some people and companies that benefit and are not really affected whenever there is a crisis for instance, the manufacturers of guns and ammunitions, pharmaceutical supplies as well and relief materials are always in profit.

The emergence of war is has adverse effects for global peace;adverse global  economic effects including extreme poverty,unemployment,inflation,food shortages,deglobalization and unfavorable environmental factors.

For the global economy, fuel and food shortages caused by the war are exacerbating post-pandemic inflation that had already reached multi-decade highs in most of the world. War us a global threat and it reduces the world's economic progess to a zero level.
 War is affects our lives,there's withdrawal of economic and financial activities,leaving us with no choice to suffer insignificantly.

Wars leave deep traces in the country’s economy during and after the war, as well as social and physical consequences.Even after the war,it takes a lot time and effort for some countries and finally recover from the loss and decline in the global sectors.