Will You Support Casino Operated By The Bitcointalk Members

[bittraffic]

The Betfury casino investors who own BFG tokens I think can be considered the owners of the casino and share the revenue with them. So yes There is no problem with forum members owning a casino as long as they didn't scam.

What is more problematic is if the casino doesn't have an account here where if a user post an accusation thread, no one will answer to it who represents the casino.

[kotajikikox]

The Betfury casino investors who own BFG tokens I think can be considered the owners of the casino and share the revenue with them. So yes There is no problem with forum members owning a casino as long as they didn't scam.

well , we all hates scams so indeed that they should only prove about not being scam and provide gambling site that will serve gamblers in best manner they can bring.

What is more problematic is if the casino doesn't have an account here where if a user post an accusation thread, no one will answer to it who represents the casino.

there are several casinos that we heard that facing issue while they have no account or ANNThread here so indeed that we need to at least have an account here with reputation to give assurance for gamblers like us.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?

In that hypothetical case, the creators of the casino would have the advantage that many of us would try it out, but it would also depend on the effort and investment they make. If they made an Ann in concessions, plus advertising with a signature campaign, for example, and the site had good functionality and offered promotions, then it would probably be successful.

If the project was carried out by members of the forum but in a mediocre way, then despite the initial push that we forum members could give it, we would not gamble on it when there are so many better options on offer.

[Peanutswar]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

Depending on what is considered support. It is unlikely that I will play in a new casino, regardless of who owns it. I already use the services of casinos that completely suit me and they are the market leaders with a capitalization (and turnover) of hundreds of millions of dollars, what's the point of switching to a new project and taking risks if there are already reliable options?

There's nothing wrong to make a promotion here with their gambling casino because they want to launch it and some of the members are having a good time giving feed back for the services, user experience and etc. for the better quality of service of the casino would give and also it is good too to make a background checking before making a full service to them with the feed back of other players already, and also if you really want to support them why not to take a try to play by that at your own perspective you can try if their gambling casino is suitable fro your needs.

[Mauser]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

Yes I would promote them if they have been a recognisable member from the forum who has been around for some time and has a good trust rating. Let's say a new member who signed up 6 months ago and has already negative trust reviews, then of course I wouldn't support that casino. In my opinion the bitcointalk community is great, we have many members here who have been around 5+ years and if they would decide to run their own casino, we should help them.  I don't think this would be a conflict of interest if you promoted different casinos in the past. Opening and running your own casino requires a lot of money, experience and time. Without having some knowledge about the industry it's not a good idea to open your own casinos. So maybe working with casinos in the past and promoting their business helped to gain a better understand of how casino operates and also helped to save up money to start your own business one day.

[swogerino]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

I don't see any problems supporting such casino and I don't see any conflict of interest if they have promoted some other casinos before.I like the idea to have one such casino but the problem is that there are already quite some reputable casinos offering the best games to gamblers and they have huge budget compared to members of Bitcointalk which I think compared to these casinos their budget to be much more limited and thus not being able to compete at a serious level with the other reputable casinos.That is why we have not see one such casino as of yet,I think because of the budget limitation.

[Maestro75]

Honestly I don't like they idea to mix the forum staff with a gambling site. This will just give the forum that is already under surveillance of governments another attack vector and can possible make it easier to ban the forum in some countries.

Your comment has also opened my eyes to another fact I did not consider when I said it can get the forum member in trouble in the forum once his casino is found to lack credibility. So it can also drag this entire forum into shame and disrepute too and cause IP ban for some of our members from their government if the casino is found to be a scam and the owner is found to be a member from here. The best will be members here hiding their identities to operate their casinos.

[EarnOnVictor]

This is a good question, and you never can tell if anyone is already working on that. Gaming and gambling are paying big time, so anyone could venture into it when experienced and have adequate manpower and financial capacity. But the capital to start might be bigger than expected if you would want to be vast and secure the site and the data of your customer.

Back to your question, Yes, I will support the person because he/she is our own. I believe others would do the same thing too.

[Woodie]

In a way I would but this casino will have to deliver a service above average as they know better what makes a good casino and a bad casino because these discussions are on the forum which is to give them an advantage over the competition !
 Besides if am going to be referring other users to such a platform as their clientele isn't limited to bct, their services need to speak for itself not because we know the people behind the casino.... Its just business !!

[TopTort777]

The difference in my approach toward casino operated by bitcointalk member and other casino will be expressed in obligatory testing this casino and giving a review on a forum, and not skipping that casino, because "we already have plenty of them here". I am sceptical in testing everything new. Especially if money are involved. But I will try to build that casinos reputation (good or bad). I will risk a bit of my money to write free and honest review.

[kamvreto]

why not, of course I will support it. Building an online gambling site is not easy and requires a lot of effort and costs. When a Bitcointalk member with a good reputation manages a gambling site and promotes it here is certainly the right place. most importantly the casino site can provide some work for other members by running a signature campaign or something.

[Jating]

I have no doubt that members/gamblers here are going to support it. This is a niche community, and with that everyone is moving in a small area that sometimes we all knew each others.

So if we heard that a casino is being operated by one of us, then we will go and play and see our experience. And another beneficial thing for the casino owner is that he will have a lot of constructive criticism from us that they needed so that the casino can be improved.

[KTChampions]

Depending on what is considered support. It is unlikely that I will play in a new casino, regardless of who owns it. I already use the services of casinos that completely suit me and they are the market leaders with a capitalization (and turnover) of hundreds of millions of dollars, what's the point of switching to a new project and taking risks if there are already reliable options?

There's nothing wrong to make a promotion here with their gambling casino because they want to launch it and some of the members are having a good time giving feed back for the services, user experience and etc. for the better quality of service of the casino would give and also it is good too to make a background checking before making a full service to them with the feed back of other players already, and also if you really want to support them why not to take a try to play by that at your own perspective you can try if their gambling casino is suitable fro your needs.

As I said, I will only try new projects if, for some reason, I see a big benefit from using them. No bonus of 10-50-100 dollars will lure me away from the usual services that I use. But if a new project comes up with something really interesting then why not. But to be honest, it's hard to come up with something innovative in gambling (and if you can, it will be something illegal like squid game ).

[uneng]

But members of this forum are already part of different crypto casinos being promoted here. This is already a reality and as far as I know nobody sees it as conflict of interest. It is actually positive, because a casino can become more trustworthy in gamblers' eyes if managed by a reputable member of the forum. And I would say if it wasn't for this fact, signature campaigns wouldn't exist anymore. Thanks to these cadinos' managers who are also part of the bitcoin community we have access to such opportunities.

[BITCOIN4X]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past, what's your take on this?
Maybe in the future, we'll have one.

Why not, this is a promising business for anyone. I think some of the established members here likely have it even though they didn't publicly tell us about it.

After all, being the owner of a casino does not require you to have a good reputation but you may need to have a lot of funds from the start. Your bankroll must be strong from the start to support your business to grow and pay users winnings, otherwise you will lose the competition. Then rather than that, you also need to set aside funds for promotion because it will obviously help your business grow.

[348Judah]

I'm sure by now you have read about a casino review site where the admins are trusted members of Bitcointalk, which  I believe is good for the community because they have a good roadmap and we all know their capability as gambling reviewers
but what if reputable members here decided to put their own casino will you support them and will this become a conflict of interest if they are already or have promoted casinos in the present or in the past

Why not? as long as they meet up to the standard of the requirements for a good and reputable one they will always have the support, patronage and full hands of the forum members and beyond, but in other to make this happen ad expected, their services must not in any means be substandard, we know what we gain from other casinos out there and yours must notbbe elan exceptional in terms of quality delivery, follow the normal protocols and experience a better patronage amd most importantly the functionality of your site must be always in accurate position, don't give room to any means whereby you will be suspected for scam related offenses with your services.

[_BlackStar]

OP, you'll probably get easier data if you create a poll thread for the same question. But sadly, you didn't make it.

I tried to give an easy answer to your question. In my opinion, support or not really depends on the interpretation of each user because not all gamblers have the desire to try new casinos that have not been proven to be reputable. You shouldn't trust anyone online, that's an important point. One may be highly reputable for successful trades, smooth loans or for other positive feedback. My answer depends - but I don't want to gamble right now.

[bitzizzix]

It doesn't matter if our members operate the casino in this forum, and most importantly, the members have a good reputation and are also active in the gambling section. Dan understands to operate it and also has a large fund for the casino it runs, so it's fine with me and I'll try to get involved.
and the coolest thing is to understand what we want and also without problems in terms of transactions, besides these members often discuss and solve problems together and think we are the same to help and support each other.

[TimeTeller]

OP, you'll probably get easier data if you create a poll thread for the same question. But sadly, you didn't make it.

I tried to give an easy answer to your question. In my opinion, support or not really depends on the interpretation of each user because not all gamblers have the desire to try new casinos that have not been proven to be reputable. You shouldn't trust anyone online, that's an important point. One may be highly reputable for successful trades, smooth loans or for other positive feedback. My answer depends - but I don't want to gamble right now.

That's a good idea. A poll can give him insight regarding the pulse of the gambling community in the forum.
Anyway, he can still add it if he will read your suggestion and see what the position of the users here.
But if the casino is handled by known and reputable members, why not?
Because the advantage here, is that you can easily reach them if you need help from their side.
As they don't want to ruin their reputation, they will for sure resolve the issues as soon as possible.
They have seen and heard already what the players would want from a casino, so they should be the one implementing it also.

[Hispo]

I would be okey with it if they showed a very good grade of transparency and professionalism while operating such business.
Also, I don't think the fact some of the people behind a new casino previously promoted another casino would be a problem, there are many examples of engineers, scientists, chefs, programmers who worked for a company before starting their own business within the same field, it is just matter of public relation management, quitting a job or position does not mean it was a bad one, it just means one needed to in order to pursue better chances or for the sake of one's family, etc...