This was taken from
their official ANN thread[...]
As you already have a scam topic you should not spam here. We have responded to you.
[...]
You also claimed you know BGAMING staff and sent us screenshots of the chats with him regarding the security checks of owl.games.
That conversation is fake.
[...]
I have to agree with
owlgames representative for his first point quoted above, we already have an active accusation here where both parties are present. I'd suggest OP to stay on this thread and not doing simultaneous discussion on both thread. It'll be quite difficult for anyone who following this case to catch up with evidences, statements, and other things related to the accusation if you divide the discussion into two threads.
For instance, the case of "that conversation is fake", it could actually put some weight into the consideration for this case, and due to OP throwing discussion elsewhere, people here --the Neutrals, if I may borrow
JollyGood's words-- might not getting it.
Ok, with that said, one point that I'm trying to tackle and shed some light into here is the doubt from owlgames that OP is a scammer, which would made them reluctant to expedite the case --disregarding, for now, if that action is justified or not-- because from their perspective, OP "fabricated" an evidence. Add that to the fact that OP's account here is brand new, he uses anon telegram, etc. etc. etc. that owlgames said
here[1], it just strengthen the doubt because --maybe, according to their POV-- if OP can "fabricate" a chat history, why can't he fabricate a screenshot of bet history?
While, from OP's side, he believed all of his evidences are valid and honest. He
did has all of the chat history with a "security team from bgaming", thus owlgames' accusation that he made up the conversation is unacceptable and that's just their way to twist the truth.
Now, how about this: there is, in fact, no conversation with security team, but both party is still true to their words, because the true culprit behind this fake evidence is
extrarakeback... oops, I mean to say
aew. I think we can all agree that it's been established that he's a scammer and he has his own agenda for this case. So he approached OP, pretending that he can help, lying about the chat with security team and fed that to the OP in hope for some reward. Thus, when he was denied of the reward, he tried to change sides.
I was supporting the OP . Untill now so i removed allmyreplies of supporting him. He is a scammer
And i would like to apologize to Owlgames
As the chat history suggest --let's pretend for a sec that the chat history between him and "security team" is true-- that owlgames cheated OP, how on earth the person who witnessed it firsthandedly suddenly changed his mind and think that
now OP is the scammer. I mean, he's the one who contacted "his friend" and was the one assured that OP won fairly. And since that he had a past history of faking transaction, faking reviews, scamming people, abusing merits, and god know what else he did in the past, it is not too far fetched that aew also faked his conversation with security team.
So, I suggest to remove the chat with security team and any other evidences that's related to aew from evidences for this case.
And, ultimately, speaking of evidences,
owlgames I am still waiting for your counter-evidence of OP's betting history. As how the discussion on other thread suggest that it is quite strange for OP to screenshot every bet he did, and that it is not difficult nowadays to fabricate images, the only way that I can see that you can do to invalidate OP's evidence is if you can prove an evenmore legit bet log. Honestly, how difficult is it to get into your system and pull his betting data? I am quite sure that you can do such data pulling from your database, so I have no idea why can't you provide them the second it is asked, and it's been days since it's asked and you still can't provide them.
[1] as other had said, new accounts etc. etc. didn't directy means the OP is a scammer who hid his identity, furthermore, OP even offered to prove a video call, ultimately giving an absolute KYC. So your excuse that OP is scammer because of his accounts' age is very very irrelevant. Find something else to attack him, smarter this time. Oh, before I forget, L-O-L.
The market price of Owl token has a huge drop I hope it has nothing to do with this issue 10% drop is not good Owlgame show sign that they are willing to settle this issue by unlocking OP's account and giving back his deposit, we still want to get the report from the providers its very important for transparency, the longer it drags on, it's not good for Owlgame and the token as well.
I've been wanting to address your post before, but decided against it as it's rather out of topic because I can't see how their token price related to the scam accusation. What I was trying to say that time was something that goes with the line, "It's not decining
now because, truthfully, how many from the entire "investors" actually do their DD and researched about the project they're trying to invest on? But if the cases keep piling upon their closet, there won't be much room in it to hide their skeleton and eventually everybody, be it the ones who do a thorough DD or someone who just glanced ad price chart and dive in head first into the investment, would know, and price would snowballed from that point forward.
Now, to address your implied suggestion that everything would be solved by unlocking OP's account, I have to say that the solution is like slapping a band aid over a crack in a huge dam. Suppose that OP is the right one and owlgames cheated their members --though at this point I urge everybody to stay neutral because the evidences are quite poluted. Thanks again to aew and owlgames' reluctance to provide any counter-evidence--, what could be the guarantee that this case wont repeat itself in the future? Another victim whose account got locked unfairly. A ban hammer slapped unilaterally? May I remind all of us that owlgames has their other --at least this one is unearthed and successfully made public--
misbehavior with moonbet that almost tainted moonbet's reputation if they didn't act quickly. That is why, it is not a simple case of unlocking the account and unfreezing all the fund. The case shouldn't just end there. It is best to know if owlgames has a tendency to cheat their members and throwing ban hammer like candies on halloween or OP is --by a turn of event-- the scammer here.
That is why
owlgames ---ohh look at that, I even bolded their name three times in a post just to catch their attention-- provide your own proofs to invalidate OP's claim, FFS. What's so difficult about it if you're the right one here and --as per your claim-- OP is lying?
