so its a case of "do as i say" not a "do as i do" case.. ok got it
Can we be realistic for one quick moment? If you create a new account for a Centralized Exchange every time you trade, you will either get banned or have your funds stolen (frozen) as soon as you create the second or the third account. Because no way in hell will any Exchange not put a red flag over your IP.
I challenge you to do this on Coinbase.
i was not the one telling people to use different ID's for each daily action/event with a service.
it was you that was telling people to do it. and i was the one telling you the pitfalls in your idea.. which is why i said "i call BS" because if you were to be doing it. you would have found the pitfalls and realised its not an idea worth promoting as it doesnt work
its actually you that should challenge yourself to do the things you say before you suggest it to others.. just test out your theories before implying its a working idea, implying that it has proven itself effective.
by testing your theory so you can see the result of the actions you are asking others to do..you then realise the pitfalls of your idea's..
but it seems however, you quickly realised your mistake. you have now realised your request of others to destroy an identity per action would actually get an exchange to notice their attempts of service abuse more and cause the service to flag people MORE and link their accounts. and put them on a watch list
so you have learned .. good. your idea does not work with CEX services
you are willing to learn and correct yourself +1point
But I am going to pretend you did not ignore the part of my post where I said I am not using any Centralized Exchange. I am also going to pretend you did not intentionally skip words out of my replies, this time to Dave, in order to take things out of context.
'Because if you care about your privacy, you will dispose of ALMOST anything you do after your action is complete.'
much like those advertising using a mixer pre custodian. such actions of mixers and using isposible ID's are not privacy concerving. but instead red flag triggering to get you noticed more out of the noise of millions of normal users
did you know that exchanges dont actively have employees watching their customers trades 24/7.
you are not being "watched"
yes they keep data logs. but as long as there are no red flags that data just stays logged and is not seen by a human eye or reported.
however using false ID or mixers are red flags that do start investigations..
much like wanting to not be seen when walking down the street your advising others to run around and do extra work and do things that look out of the ordinary like sneak behind bushes, shimmy under parked cars.. yet those activities actually catch peoples eye more and they start looking at you wondering what you are upto.
.. sometimes in life.. less is more. the less attention to attract to yourself the more you get to hide in the noise of normal activity which no one listens to because they are prefering to concentrate on other more important things.
in every subtle questioning of "bitcoiners dont care about privacy" you imply bitcoin doesnt have any.
The average Bitcoiner does not care about their privacy. Exchange hacks and bankruptcies would not be such a spearhead to the market if there were not so many Bitcoiners who had their funds stored over there instead of Bitcoin Core or a Cold Wallet. They do not use Bitcoin Core, they rather use Electrum. They complete KYC for Altcoin bounties that end up being scams. They use no Coin Control, they just do not seem to care.
maybe write cryptocurrecny users that use services.. just to be clear.
rather then specifying a certain group.
oh and more coin is stored in exchanges over on the ethereum network than the bitcoin network. just saying
but you are calling out "bitcoiners"
oh and last time i checked of all exchanges combined only 16% of coins were ever custodianised at its peak. and since the fiasco of some exchanges that is down to ~13% as of today.. so its not a majority of bitcoiners that are using exchanges as custodians. should you dare check
again. go check ethereums exchange market reserves.. and separate exchange custodian staking hoard
you will see a higher percentage of ethfairy's(people of ethereum) dont care much about their privacy because more of them use custodians
by you implying that because bitcoinser dont employ tactics of XYZ there is a privacy issue for bitcoiners.
again clarify that its SERVICE USERS you are addressing rather than brushing majority of bitcoiners into your minority category
......
oh one last thing
i have a stash of many bitcoins gathered since 2012. probably alot more coins than you have..
i dont use mixers or coinjoins. but i do spend with bitcoin merchants..
i dont use disposable IDs per action..
soo.. find my stash.
heck ill even give you 5 hints
a. funds are in addresses only used 2012-2022
b. funds were added over those years but mainly 2012-2014
c. the hoard:spend ratio is 20:1
d. i dont have that many address
e. no its not the 1frank vanity. as that was just a joke address for 'penny grabby' play money amounts i never intend to spend
also find my birth certified name
.. goodluck
but mainly .. atleast try to not imply things.. and instead use the term "cryptocurrency users of services" rather then targetting "bitcoiners"
there is a HUGE diference