A superstitious strategy?

[ethereumhunter]

It may be called luck if you can get big wins in dice or casino games because gambling games are based on luck. But we also never know when our luck will come and give us a chance to win and we can only keep trying until our money runs out. But if we play gambling until our money runs out, it's not recommended because gambling will take all of your money. Some people say it is superstition, but some also say it is a strategy.

[1715296072]

1715296072

[1715296072]

1715296072

[1715296072]

1715296072

[swogerino]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

I would love to do that but guess what,it is plain impossible to know when luck will be by your side.In my latest three gambling sessions playing the same slot machine,at two first sessions I won by betting auto bet 20 spins with minimal bet and thought to have found the magic strategy,a superstition but in this third session I kept losing constantly because it didn't work out well for me as I did not won anything.

There are no strategies that work in gambling whatsoever,I mean in games of luck like slot machines and other related games where luck is 100% needed there and not game of skills,in those games you have somewhat better chances but luck is also what determines the final outcome there.

[acroman08]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

what's a casino war? I have not heard of it. perhaps I might have seen it before but just didn't know the name of the game.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

but how exactly are gamblers going to know if luck is on their side before gambling? should I gamble first and then if I won several times I decide that luck is on my side and I continue gambling? and what if I started losing several times after deciding that luck is on my side because of the winning streak I had, should I stop despite having a winning streak before?

[Alisha-k]

As far as gambling is concerned no strategy has proven to be super reliable not even martingale not just because it is lame but gambling is just a luck based adventure. Been luck a few times was just chance and fate working out towards your favor and that is why when it was far away losses striked.

[STT]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

The first reaction most would have is to say no but I reckon the vast majority of players do exactly as you did.    I've betted on that basis but the big adjustment I would suggest is that a person should only run a set budget to spend on that particular day and week.    If you vary your spending within a budget it cant get too out of control plus it also will stop the impulse to chase losses on any particular day.   I would say go with the good luck streak but also calculate to keep back some capital for the next day and day after.  Be regular in your luck and aspiration to win, avoid trying to get just one big win; this is why Im against Martingale as it stacks bets up hoping for that final win to justify all prior bets.

[BitcoinPanther]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

Any roll or bet that relies on luck is no strategy at all.  So, I cannot call it a good strategy.  But, If you win huge and quit while you are on the win, then that is what I called good strategy.  I believe strategy starts from the start of wagering to the last roll on the platform for that session.  Anything that gives you good amount to withdraw is a good strategy and  anything that losses your bankroll is a bad strategy.  After all, in gambling, the end justify the means.  So regardles if it s brought by luck or your own analysis, as long as you come out in green, that can be called good strategy.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

Whether superstitiously, literally or practically, in what ever form, there is no way to tell when exactly luck is on ones side or when its not, I have this horoscope/tarot/card reading app on my phone that tends to tell me the day i will get lucky in gambling and the days I will not be so lucky, and for some time, i believe in this readings and at a point, i decided to test out the app readings in my gambling activities, I played gambling only the days the app tells me to play because luck is on my side, and it seems as though this days are the days i tend to loose most.

So , there is no sensual way to really know when luck is on our side until we step out there and try out some games, except for a genuine spiritual who could see in the spirit, like you talked about superstition, which is not really common, aside this, if it was possible for each and every one of us to naturally know when luck was on our side, i believe no body will loose money in gambling, and most casinos will close down their business before a week of operation due to not having enough funds to pay gamblers winnings.

[blockman]

It's not a strategy because you don't have to think about it, you'll wait for the result to come, and then if it's favorable to you then you'll figure out that you're lucky if you're winning at most times. But if not, then that means you're not lucky and just losing everything you've got. And if there's someone that has been doing this strategy for so long and only gambles to continue when he's lucky, and then stops completely when for the first few bets he's already losing.

[Mahanton]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

There's no way that there's a thing that could influence out on for you to be lucky on a particular gambling session.We would only know that we are  lucky when we are already that winning and there's no way we could
be able to determine if we are lucky or not on the time we do play.We wont know until we do try out and this is why its never been that recommendable for you to push up your luck and making yourself
desperate that everything do really work because this would really make a huge mess into your finances if you are that someone who do really pushes off their luck
and trying out to make yourself that looking forward on getting positive outcomes.

[Hydrogen]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

I think that can describe approaches similar to modified versions of martingale.

Where a player might reduce their wager amount by half when they lose and double the wager amount after a win. Assuming that periods of winning and losing will be cyclical and trend based.

But to develop a good gambling strategy involving superstition. I think it would be necessary to follow guidelines set by esoteric branches of study like astrology. There are many who have commented on the uncanny accuracy of astrological descriptions. There are interesting facets of study behind these trends. Which interestingly enough could involve math and statistics. Even things which on the surface appear completely superstition or luck, might involve math and science upon deeper inspection.

[carlfebz2]

It's not a strategy because you don't have to think about it, you'll wait for the result to come, and then if it's favorable to you then you'll figure out that you're lucky if you're winning at most times. But if not, then that means you're not lucky and just losing everything you've got. And if there's someone that has been doing this strategy for so long and only gambles to continue when he's lucky, and then stops completely when for the first few bets he's already losing.

Exactly!

You cant call it a strategy since you are just basically be doing up those casual actions or moves that you had on the time you do engage a particular gambling game.If it do turns out to be positive or profitable then
it would be normal that you would be thinking that your current strategy is working.

Just like been said that there's no thing on this world which would affect or increase your winning chances or probability or simply luck on dealing with a gambling game considering that
everything is random. Never make yourself been pushed on believing on things which are impossible to point or notice it out.

[chaser15]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

Isn't it obvious that once we feel luck is on our side, we will continue to gamble? Not a strategy but rather a common and usual approach.

I have that kind of feeling too but in most cases, even on a losing streak, I try to bounce back without relying on my luck. In gambling, there's no such thing as a direct connection related to any superstitious belief and I don't want to apply that thing in my gambling activity.

If it seems good for you, then it's up to you how you looked at it.

[Kasabus]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

I hate to disagree but there is really no evidence that suggests about being superstitious will somehow increase our chances if we bet in a specific day where we are feeling we will get lucky as we can't also know when will be our lucky day. But I think believing that we are lucky in that specific day will boost our confidence that will indeed help us in our gambling activities because we are getting positive vibes out of it, it may be fake or unreal because superstitious beliefs don't really boost our chances but the important thing is that the confidence it gives to us.

[o48o]

-cut-
Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

Well, basically magical thinking works as well as martingale (as they both don't work), but funny enough they don't hurt your changes any more then any other strategy. So you might as well go full superstitious.

Good gamblers must know that "there is not real luck" but on only statistics / math rule that can be applied on your gambling games.
Ok maybe there are some times when you feel to be "lucky" and you're winning more of the "normal" chance, but you cannot real take advantage on this since it's just based on casualty. Not more, not less.

For sure applying martingale is a destructive option for bet, " you will loss more trying to recover your previous loss".  

I agree with you. Technically there's no such thing as luck as what word comes with a package of different meanings, but i think that's the best word to describe the situation when you are against all odds winning a lot. It however doesn't necessarily mean that word "luck" would contain anything magical. Or that there would be some items that bring luck or or that some people would be born lucky or anything like that.

[serjent05]

Good gamblers must know that "there is not real luck" but on only statistics / math rule that can be applied on your gambling games.
Ok maybe there are some times when you feel to be "lucky" and you're winning more of the "normal" chance, but you cannot real take advantage on this since it's just based on casualty. Not more, not less.

More to say that in gambling there is only chance or probability, wherein the possibility of winning is random and cannot be predicted but can be theoretically calculated.  Luck in a scientific definition is like superstitions it never exists and is not true. So basing on that, superstitious strategy never exist.  .

Anyway, on topic, it won't be considered a strategy because we are only betting and wagering in blind relying on the chance that we will win one day. 

For sure applying martingale is a destructive option for bet, " you will loss more trying to recover your previous loss". 

It is indeed established if we failed to know when to stop.  There are players that can take advantage of Martingale especially the reverse one if they are relying on consecutive win and stop.  The key factor to winning using a martingale or not being destroyed by it is to know when to stop.

[qwertyup23]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

It is not a strategy perse but it is more of a convincing method for me to gamble again. That is the problem of gambling- whenever you experience a winning/losing streak, the natural tendency of a person is to try and gamble again. Unfortunately, in your case, you tried to check if you still had that luck on your side but only to experience a losing streak at the end of the day.

I hope this becomes a lesson to all to discipline yourself in gambling. Always know when to stop and when to cash out to prevent greed from taking over your winnings, thereby causing ultimate loss on your part.

[goinmerry]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

I will stick to my usual stand since then, regardless if I'm feeling lucky or not, I will just gamble.

There is a time that I overcome my losing in a certain session and that means time now for a crazy winning streak.

Anyways, don't associate your superstitious belief in gambling as a strategy. We are risking money in gambling so don't always rely on just luck.

[coin-investor]

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

As long as you are playing within your means you can use any kind of strategy, gambling is always psyching or motivating yourself to choose or have the right mindset to bet the right numbers or sequence, it will not harm you because many people are also superstitious when it comes to gambling because its a game of luck and you can sometimes summon luck.
It's part of having a good time if you think you're lucky then play, if not then take a break and come back and see if luck is now on your side, anything you believe in can be applied in gambling as long as you are playing within your means and it's not hindering your personal life.

[mvdheuvel1983]

Most gamblers must have went through this, sometimes luck appears to be your side specially in games like casino war or dice.

Today, morning I was playing casino war, I just use martingale - I know it's lame strategy. But I won most of time.

Then later at noon, luck just didn't appear to be on my side. A constant losses with win every once in a while to recoup the losses and then losing streak, all funds gone.

Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

What I believe is that sometimes this "feeling luck" as we may call it that enables us to win is actually the state of our minds when we play.
Noticed that whenever one has a clear head and mind, the individual is able to play a game well without any intrusive thoughts.
You notice that at this point when you have no damn care of the world around you and your mind is just on the game you may start to experience some "luck". The reverse is the case. This is from personal experience.

[Hispo]

-snip-
Now, let's be some superstitious and say, if you play only when luck appears to be on your side, would you call that a good strategy?

I am not even sure I would call that a strategy.
If you are superstitious, then yes; but in a practical way and keeping in mind the law of the probabilities, it would not actually matter if one continued playing during a good or a bad streak. Eventually a good session could turn into a  bad one, and vice versa