QUESTION: For Gambling Enthusiasts ❗❗

[Quidat]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

PvP type of games might be that time consuming but if you are really that goes for entertainment then it wont really be that an issue but rather it would be more interesting.
So it does really vary on your mood and preference in the end of the day.So there would be no exact thing about on which one is good because a certain person could
neither be having both for them to deal with basing up on their gambling or leisure needs.Myself could easily made out some switch in between two if i wanted to
as long i do have the money to make bets and im that knowledgeable on things then this one really counts.

[1715590280]

1715590280

[1715590280]

1715590280

[Bushdark]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

Yes option A looks very cool and no stress and many gamblers wi prefer that to many options here because even though the house may have great advantage but gamblers do have similar advantage to win good bets if you know what you are doing. Gambling is more of understanding than just playing your favorite games.

Option B is whatfew gamblers may considered because I usually see this kind of setting in virsual games like soccer and other similar gamblers where two opponents will be playing against themselves looking for a winner.

[DoublerHunter]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

^I respect this opinion which seems I like it too.
If you want to enjoy your gambling as having fun, fighting against the house edge will be really enjoyable than fighting against your opponent which is a human or a PVP game. Based on luck games are stressless, it just depends on your luck. You can take a break anytime you want or you can pause your game. However, experiencing pvp games is also good.

[tabas]

Yeah, those games that are RNG are hardly to be cheated on and if there's a chance then that's just a slight one or in a very rare occasion. But those games that are based on skills, we like to get on it because they're based on how good they are. Although for some instances, if it's a PVP type of betting and it's a game where people can abuse and find a way to earn, they'll for sure going to make a way to abuse the game and cheat on it because the system might be foreseen into that situation. Those are like the bugs that's being uncaught and they take advantage of it.

Cheats are a big concern in the PvP sphere, but I think there will be decent products in the future that will have a decent anti-cheat system, which can be a mix between AIs and humans.

I also believe that there will be certain measures that they'll be able to make to avoid those cheaters or gamblers or players to abuse the system or to detect them easily. There will be moments that it will be fun to make and those updates will make everyone want to do PvP in gambling with almost every possible game that we can play with.

For example on esports cheating is very common as is not rare to see top level players cheating by using aim bots or wall hacks which allow them to see their rivals behind walls giving them an unfair advantage, and they even do this when there is money at stake cheating legitimate players of their wins, so I can only imagine that if more PVP games become popular at casinos we will see something similar happening, with cheaters doing everything they can to obtain an unfair advantage.

That's a fact and even in competitive tournaments, there were those players that have tried to attempt it on an official match. But, as think thought that they'll never get caught, well, they do were caught.

[Shinpako09]

As a gambler myself, this is tough. Option A is what I always play and wanted to but I'm gonna choose B. Simply because I'm not against the house. We all know how hard to beat the house. The last time I played PvP was in Primedice when it is still available. It's just your playing time will be longer as it is slower compared to option A coz I need to wait for someone to accept the challenge.

[traderethereum]

As a gambler myself, this is tough. Option A is what I always play and wanted to but I'm gonna choose B. Simply because I'm not against the house. We all know how hard to beat the house. The last time I played PvP was in Primedice when it is still available. It's just your playing time will be longer as it is slower compared to option A coz I need to wait for someone to accept the challenge.

We don't need to go against the house but try to enjoy gambling time by playing the game we choose.
Whether it's Option A or Option B, both give pleasure to every gambler so they will play longer, especially if they win.
But with so many gamblers congregating at certain casinos, the waiting time for someone to accept the challenge won't be long, especially if we play at a well-known and reputable casino.
But playing gambling in Option A or Option B can make us forget to stop playing because of the fun we get from the casino.

[goldkingcoiner]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

Ok, thought-provoking questions in the gambling subforum today, but I will try my utmost best to give you a clear answer.

As much as I completely adore games where you do not have to play against another human, for example slots, I also very much enjoy playing with other people. Not because I win their money (although the sensation of "schadenfreude" is exciting, when you win their hard earned money), but because at some point, playing alone does start to become a bit lonely.

We are social animals, after all. My vote is for people vs people.

[pawanjain]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

If I were in this situation then I would choose option B because I like competing with other players.
It doesn't really matter much if you are playing with a stranger. Although it would be more fun while playing with friends but we do get fun when we compete against a real person.
Winning against a real person gives a satisfaction which we don't get from competing against a casino.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

I will first analyze myself as a gambler and check the area am best at in gambling, if my preferred choice goes with gambling against an opponent then i will go for option B while if i will only prefer betting against the system then i go for option A, nevertheless this also determines the capability of my financial stand if i can be able to bet on a raw or have the two in combination because it will definitely requires several attempts for one to have the chances of winning at least one if chosen the option B.

[Peanutswar]

 The term PvP is a Person versus Person upon playing tabletop games still you are competing with the other players  some of the people must prefer this because they know the excitement of beating other people with their skills, and some of them just want to flex this knowledge and talent in playing gambling to gain reputation, well different purpose why they want to choose this, in playing solo only for me does not make too much because the excitement is in the every roll and multiplier you hit, its a Game vs person you want to beat the current system and win a huge amount.

[FatFork]

I'm more of a old school kind of person. I prefer classic gambling (if online casinos can even be called classic gambling), although I'm familiar with PvP gambling, where individuals compete against each other in games of skill or chance, rather than against a casino or house. However, I do see the appeal of PvP gambling as well. The idea of going head to head with other individuals, rather than against the house, adds a whole new level of challenge and excitement. It's great to see the growth of online card games and esports tournaments, which provide a platform for PvP gambling. In the end, it's all about personal preference. Some people love the classic casino experience, while others prefer the challenge of PvP gambling.

[Casdinyard]

I voted for casino B foremost because the concept works so well on paper. Most of the games we have today are so boring and tedious I might as well watch paint dry and bet on whether a drop of it will land on my scuffed shoes or not. Then again, I have yet to see a casino actually executing a PVP gambling website. Mostly because it's expensive to make one and even more expensive to maintain it. So my disappointment is immeasurable. Hoping that one day a casino steps up and makes one though. Pretty sure it'll blow up.

[rahmad2nd]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

Ideally, option A will always be favored by connoisseurs and fans who prefer the casino type of games. however, those who like new types of challenges such as PvP games will no exception also play the type of game option A. at least, we are presented with a variety of game types that also have many differences.

Which in the end, all depends on one's choice, taste, and expertise. for me, games like PvP might offer something new and we can get involved in it. it could be just to find a new atmosphere, or just to get experience depending on the games they offer. however, the type of game option A will always have a fanatical connoisseur. especially those people who prefer simple games just to relax and relieve stress. one example, as you say.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Ok, thought-provoking questions in the gambling subforum today, but I will try my utmost best to give you a clear answer.

As much as I completely adore games where you do not have to play against another human, for example slots, I also very much enjoy playing with other people. Not because I win their money (although the sensation of "schadenfreude" is exciting, when you win their hard earned money), but because at some point, playing alone does start to become a bit lonely.

We are social animals, after all. My vote is for people vs people.

But literally, there is no game that you are not going to win other people's hard earned money, because be it slot, dice, sportbetting or any other game that wont involves a winner working away with other people's money risk at a certain price, which is why it's called "gambling" because they willingly gave the money out at a risk. Secondly, p2p will be more fun due to the fact that it gives users the privilege to gamble between themselves

[fullhdpixel]

I will first analyze myself as a gambler and check the area am best at in gambling, if my preferred choice goes with gambling against an opponent then i will go for option B while if i will only prefer betting against the system then i go for option A, nevertheless this also determines the capability of my financial stand if i can be able to bet on a raw or have the two in combination because it will definitely requires several attempts for one to have the chances of winning at least one if chosen the option B.

The option B is about PvP gambling. I think this type of gambling is more winnable if one practices a lot and already build sufficient experience but it does not mean that you will engage on the real thing first and use some cash but there might be a similar game simulation for one to sharpen their skills.

It was the option A or gambling against the house is a kind of gambling which are hard to win because the house always has the advantage. They already adjusted their system this way and there is no way for the users to change it unless if they are a part of the gambling team and they will do an inside job. Choosing both types of gambling can be fun though and more challenging.

[Oilacris]

Ok, thought-provoking questions in the gambling subforum today, but I will try my utmost best to give you a clear answer.

As much as I completely adore games where you do not have to play against another human, for example slots, I also very much enjoy playing with other people. Not because I win their money (although the sensation of "schadenfreude" is exciting, when you win their hard earned money), but because at some point, playing alone does start to become a bit lonely.

We are social animals, after all. My vote is for people vs people.

But literally, there is no game that you are not going to win other people's hard earned money, because be it slot, dice, sportbetting or any other game that wont involves a winner working away with other people's money risk at a certain price, which is why it's called "gambling" because they willingly gave the money out at a risk. Secondly, p2p will be more fun due to the fact that it gives users the privilege to gamble between themselves

So it do always falls down on someones interest and preference because if we do look those casino games to be interesting because of fast results and easy access and outcome then compared into those
pvp type which it does really take up some time but this is somehow more entertaining but we know that each person does have their own interest when it comes to gambling approach.
PvP games or Casino games, it doesnt matter because you are the ones who do have the full rights since its your money and it would be also basing up on your mood whether you do
like to play casino games or would like to be playing with other players when it comes to those strategic games.

[chaser15]

The option B is about PvP gambling. I think this type of gambling is more winnable if one practices a lot and already build sufficient experience but it does not mean that you will engage on the real thing first and use some cash but there might be a similar game simulation for one to sharpen their skills.

It was the option A or gambling against the house is a kind of gambling which are hard to win because the house always has the advantage. They already adjusted their system this way and there is no way for the users to change it unless if they are a part of the gambling team and they will do an inside job. Choosing both types of gambling can be fun though and more challenging.

I doubt Option B is more winnable like what you are saying. Since that was skill-based, expect that more skilled players will engage in that gambling and you will mostly encounter them as you progress. Only a few players will choose that kind of gambling therefore, only those players that know the game will play that game.

You can't expect to always face a newbie on that type of game. They are being mostly skilled and even highly professional.

Both gambling types are somehow hard to win. It's just that once we already gaining profits playing at those, try to take a break and don't get carried away.