QUESTION: For Gambling Enthusiasts ❗❗

[Guzter]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

[1715552359]

1715552359

[Guzter]

For me, I believe slot games are much better, as they are more entertaining, have less pressure & stress, and gives you the chance to turn small bet into a large chunk of money.

[jackg]

If B if your answer then I doubt you have long to wait. There's already games like axie/roy that do that sort of thing but not with good graphics/strategy yet imo as well as live table games (which I assume function like actual casinos and I was under the impression they have these for blackjack and poker).

I'd prefer a PvP that was designed and played like an MMORPG but I guess we're a while away from that being a thing (wagers could be placed on leagues of those imo too to make it more appealing to gambling).

[Guzter]

If B if your answer then I doubt you have long to wait. There's already games like axie/roy that do that sort of thing but not with good graphics/strategy yet imo as well as live table games (which I assume function like actual casinos and I was under the impression they have these for blackjack and poker).

I'd prefer a PvP that was designed and played like an MMORPG but I guess we're a while away from that being a thing (wagers could be placed on leagues of those imo too to make it more appealing to gambling).

Yeah, the thing about PvP gamling, is that most of the games that i've seen, they suck in terms of graphics and strategies.
Also, I believe having a hardcore game such as MMORPG, would be quite frustrating, as these games usually are to much skill-based, with a large gap in skills between the average player and the very good one, which makes the average player afraid to play, fearing if they match-up against a smurf.

[Yogee]

..... which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

I prefer gambling against the house in silence most of the time but I'm also fine playing against another players sometimes. I usually don't want to exert much effort and prefer to rely on luck when playing in a casino so it's natural for me to pick A over B.

[Wapfika]

PvP is always a conflict on gambling if you asked normal gambler like that doesn’t have skills on skill based game like you mention on the option B. Normally like me will choose the option A that is easy and purely luck based game because we have no chance of winning on PvP games that requires skills.

There might me some user here that will pick option B but I’m confident that the majority here will choose A because it’s more easy to win on this type of game rather than competing against the pro on the game that they are good at.

[bitbollo]

Personally, I would prefer option B because there is more chance to win and these kind of games are based on strategy / skill / experience and not just "lucky based".
But games of group B requires people to be online (enough people with different skills, wagering option...) it's not easy to have such setup...

[Guzter]

..... which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

I prefer gambling against the house in silence most of the time but I'm also fine playing against another players sometimes. I usually don't want to exert much effort and prefer to rely on luck when playing in a casino so it's natural for me to pick A over B.

Well the only thing good about PvP, is that it's a bit engaging, as you won't be playing in silent. But usually when I'm gambling it's like "Ok I have xx$, don't waste my time, it's either i'm mega rich or feel cheated", most of the times i feel cheated  :/.

[Guzter]

PvP is always a conflict on gambling if you asked normal gambler like that doesn’t have skills on skill based game like you mention on the option B. Normally like me will choose the option A that is easy and purely luck based game because we have no chance of winning on PvP games that requires skills.

There might me some user here that will pick option B but I’m confident that the majority here will choose A because it’s more easy to win on this type of game rather than competing against the pro on the game that they are good at.

Indeed it is easier, but less certain.

[dothebeats]

I would choose A. I really like playing alone and grinding it out solo, and I find myself consciously trying hard to be better against other people drains too much energy than I really like. But if I'm in the mood to go and be a try-hard, perhaps going to a PvP casino is the way to go. It's really fun to go against someone that has better skills than you because you'll be learning a lot in how they play and how they respond to pressure which you can definitely use the next time you'll be playing the same game.

[swogerino]

It all depends on the mood of a person I think.Personally I like playing in a casino which offers a lot of slot machines as I would love to try my luck instantly when I am trying to win a jackpot or the max payout of a slot machine because slots have the maximum prize most of them from x5000-x300000 depending on the slot,usually most of them x5000-x10000 and this is something I cannot find in a PvP casino.

When I am feeling relaxed and I want to go play a Sit n Go Texas holdem poker tournament sure I would choose the PvP casino but this would happen rarely compared to the number of times I would choose a normal casino.

[darkangel11]

If B if your answer then I doubt you have long to wait. There's already games like axie/roy that do that sort of thing but not with good graphics/strategy yet imo as well as live table games (which I assume function like actual casinos and I was under the impression they have these for blackjack and poker).

I'd prefer a PvP that was designed and played like an MMORPG but I guess we're a while away from that being a thing (wagers could be placed on leagues of those imo too to make it more appealing to gambling).

I feel like it's going to be the future one day.

Imagine a game like diablo that uses a cryptocurrency instead of gold. You drop crypto in game, use it as a currency in their store, can spend it on exchanges outside of the game, hold it in a wallet and wager it in casinos. Then you can also bet it against other players in a pvp within the game and win more.

As far as I know PvP gambling is not a thing yet, not even in the simplest way like 2 players playing chess or something. The only way to do PvP in a casino is to play poker.

[Welsh]

B, PVP. However, it has to be a skilled based game, and not something that's based on luck or at least have some skill, and some luck like a lot of the card games out there. This has been done though. I'm personally, against any completely luck based games, I just don't find them fun. You're basically guaranteed to lose in the long run. Hence, why I like sports betting. I see it as myself against the bookie that puts the odds out. I lose most of the time, but I still don't feel like I'm being cheated out of winning by some predetermined odds.

[pawel7777]

...
2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

I prefer B for the entertainment value. But looking purely from the profitability perspective, any online PvP games that are played online and where there are big money involved, will have a high risk of being abused by bots. And as we already know, there are pretty much no skill/strategy games left where computers can't outperform people. You can win short term (i.e. few hands in poker) but, in the long-run, you're doomed to fail, as computers don't make mistakes.

But there's another form of P2P gambling that I find quite interesting: P2P sports/events betting, where odds are determined by the amounts wagered on each side of the bet. In this kind of betting, there's a big chance of getting a really good odds if you go against the grain.

[Guzter]

I would choose A. I really like playing alone and grinding it out solo, and I find myself consciously trying hard to be better against other people drains too much energy than I really like. But if I'm in the mood to go and be a try-hard, perhaps going to a PvP casino is the way to go. It's really fun to go against someone that has better skills than you because you'll be learning a lot in how they play and how they respond to pressure which you can definitely use the next time you'll be playing the same game.

I can't say it better.

[Guzter]

B, PVP. However, it has to be a skilled based game, and not something that's based on luck or at least have some skill, and some luck like a lot of the card games out there. This has been done though. I'm personally, against any completely luck based games, I just don't find them fun. You're basically guaranteed to lose in the long run. Hence, why I like sports betting. I see it as myself against the bookie that puts the odds out. I lose most of the time, but I still don't feel like I'm being cheated out of winning by some predetermined odds.

Well, for me a mix of luck and skill would be the best. As if it's solely based on skill, it will be either you skilled at the game or you'll only be losing money.

[OgNasty]

PvP gambling would be awesome. Many years ago there was a platform that let you gamble against other players in an online mini putt putt game. It was fun. This was pre-crypto. The problem is that people always find a way to cheat or they master certain things so it isn’t as fair as it should be. One day gambling will find its way into popular video game systems though. When you can bet real money against players on your Xbox playing popular games, that will be awesome.

[Silberman]

PvP gambling would be awesome. Many years ago there was a platform that let you gamble against other players in an online mini putt putt game. It was fun. This was pre-crypto. The problem is that people always find a way to cheat or they master certain things so it isn’t as fair as it should be. One day gambling will find its way into popular video game systems though. When you can bet real money against players on your Xbox playing popular games, that will be awesome.

This is the direction we may be headed, after all what are loot boxes if not another form of gambling already? However this will probably push the rating of those video games immediately to the A rating which is only for those aged 18 and above, besides this will bring all kind of trouble especially when it comes to the matching algorithm, since now players could use their smurf accounts to beat players with lesser skills, collusion will become a problem, players could lose intentionally to drop their ranking and then get some easy wins, and a myriad of other problems which we see whenever money is at stake.

[coolcoinz]

The problem is that people always find a way to cheat or they master certain things so it isn’t as fair as it should be.

Mastering isn't a problem as you master it the fair way. What I find annoying in all the PvP games is that people either cheat using software, or they find bugs and glitches that allow them to win against other players and make their experience as bad as possible. This used to be a thing in all shooters, especially battlefield and call of duty series. For this reason while choosing a gambling PvP game you'd have to be prepared to lose money, even if you're a skilled player.

There's also a thing with practice. Would you allow players to play without wagering, just to get to know the game and get better at it before they make their bets? If you do, you'll end up with people experimenting with various tactics and you give them more time to find glitches and bugs they can later use against other players. If you don't do it, the only way to get better would be to put money into the game, so people ready to put a lot of time and money into the game ultimately win more, which makes it a pay to win game.

That said, I'd still choose B, if the game was well made.

[harizen]

PVP gaming is really a thing but only for those who are skilled enough in that particular and specific game.

Not all do have those skills that's why others preferred just playing the usual casino games and find their luck. PVP type of gaming is also for experienced ones that a pre-knowledge about the game is really necessary before anyone wants to compete with others with stake money.

There are also games that might be prone to some cheats or any sort of game bot e.g chess, checkers, pool, billiards etc. and we don't know if we are against a real human or a bot.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

This questions and comparison between pvp and casino games might not be fair, and this is because -
Pvp games requires a good level of skill to be able to win, while casino games on the other hand is purely luck based, those who lack the skill to challenge or play against other gamblers will definitely settle for casino games, while those who have the skill winning the game requires will choose to settle with pvp games..

But if I was asked to make a choice as to which I think is more fun to play, I would prefer pvp games over casino games, I think nothing is more fun in gambling than challenging other players.

[Baofeng]

I'm not only PvP to be honest, so I guess the clear answer for most of us here are A, we prefer slot games and other casino games. I don't have nothing against those who are into PvP, playing against stranger and testing their skills with others. But for some, it might take some time, I mean for sure there is a learning curve for those PvP games that you mentioned and along the way you may have lost huge money before you can 'master' some of the games and trick. As compare to casino games that is very easy, although base on luck and others are willing to take that risk with their money in slot games and bacarrat.

[Bushdark]

PVP gaming is really a thing but only for those who are skilled enough in that particular and specific game.

Not all do have those skills that's why others preferred just playing the usual casino games and find their luck. PVP type of gaming is also for experienced ones that a pre-knowledge about the game is really necessary before anyone wants to compete with others with stake money.

There are also games that might be prone to some cheats or any sort of game bot e.g chess, checkers, pool, billiards etc. and we don't know if we are against a real human or a bot.

PvP type of game is very competitive and it can be very annoying losing consistently because your opponent is a guru in the making and that alone can make you feel bad making adjustments. There are so persons thatmight find it very interesting because they are playing with a real human not against computer that could limit the chances of players winning at random.

I would prefer the pvp if I am playing with little fund because I wouldn't want to make the mistake of taking the risk of losing money easily without knowing how good and experienced the person I am playing with good be.

[uneng]

When playing against the house you have the assurance to be under provably fair system, at least in crypto casinos, so theoretically you can't be cheated. All outcomes must be fair and legit.

On the other hand, when you play on PvP mode, there are serious chances the other player uses bots and macros to have a dishonest advantage over you along the match, as we have already seen in Chess and FPS games, for example.

if there was a method to make sure PvP games were provably fair as well, I would go for it, without any doubts. But since there isn't, every gambling categories have the same winning potential for me. Casino's games have the house edge, which benefits the house on long term and PvP games have the issue I mentioned above, which benefits users making use of such resources on long term.

[famososMuertos]

There is something subjective in how you approach the subject, if you allow me to enter your idea.

The bet on the desire to do it is individual, either because you are a recreational player or because you want to obtain a latent return in the long term, that is, professional.

The above positions these two groups of individuals in any type of game that requires a bet (options A,B), whether in traditional casino games or PvP type.  In fact we will have players who manifest themselves in both.

My option: C...
No matter where you put the bet, enjoying it is the intangible gain that we should never lose, even when the ROI is not there to launch rockets.

[Guzter]

If B if your answer then I doubt you have long to wait. There's already games like axie/roy that do that sort of thing but not with good graphics/strategy yet imo as well as live table games (which I assume function like actual casinos and I was under the impression they have these for blackjack and poker).

I'd prefer a PvP that was designed and played like an MMORPG but I guess we're a while away from that being a thing (wagers could be placed on leagues of those imo too to make it more appealing to gambling).

I feel like it's going to be the future one day.

Imagine a game like diablo that uses a cryptocurrency instead of gold. You drop crypto in game, use it as a currency in their store, can spend it on exchanges outside of the game, hold it in a wallet and wager it in casinos. Then you can also bet it against other players in a pvp within the game and win more.

As far as I know PvP gambling is not a thing yet, not even in the simplest way like 2 players playing chess or something. The only way to do PvP in a casino is to play poker.

I think because it has a very small niche, as most of gamers are medium skill players.

[Guzter]

PvP gambling would be awesome. Many years ago there was a platform that let you gamble against other players in an online mini putt putt game. It was fun. This was pre-crypto. The problem is that people always find a way to cheat or they master certain things so it isn’t as fair as it should be. One day gambling will find its way into popular video game systems though. When you can bet real money against players on your Xbox playing popular games, that will be awesome.

I think as long as it involves skills people will try cheating.

[ryzaadit]

I will share thoughts about "PVP"

One thing about these, the player who is playing not gonna feeling getting cheated because is Player vs Player. However, people are more often playing against the house with some reason.

The reason, lack of player for "PVP" game except for Poker. But people who are not liked poker, will always more prefer to play against the house because looking a player is really hard and wasting some time user.
---
My thread about "PVP" Games: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5256076.msg54632401#msg54632401

But most of the casino who created the game, is already gone due the lack of player or user.

[Gozie51]

I think I prefer the option of A because of the nature of it. I like to do my own analysis of a game by myself and know my winning chances. PvP involves a great personal skill and strategy for you to be able to compete with an opponent directly. It kind of more technical for you to get to win your opponent, though it looks more of a game but to compete directly against someone creates a nostalgic feeling.

[lionheart78]

Gonna pick A since slots is the reason why I am into gambling.  I am not confident dealing with PVP thing especially when it becomes a battle of skill.  Besides, slot give better reward in ratio to the bet if we get lucky since most slots give 5k to 15k times the base bet as maximum wins.  PVP sounds cool but when it comes to the amount to win, there nothing beats a casino games.

[Finestream]

I would choose A. I really like playing alone and grinding it out solo, and I find myself consciously trying hard to be better against other people drains too much energy than I really like. But if I'm in the mood to go and be a try-hard, perhaps going to a PvP casino is the way to go. It's really fun to go against someone that has better skills than you because you'll be learning a lot in how they play and how they respond to pressure which you can definitely use the next time you'll be playing the same game.

Same with mine I’ll go for A. Although they are luck based games but they can be more challenging especially if you are fighting too with a player that has good skills as you. Either you can beat him, or you’ll be beaten but at least you also learned from him. And seeing these games have better rewards, then I would always want my luck here too.

[madnessteat]

In my opinion, the choice of gambling depends on the mood. The same gambling quickly gets boring.

For example, in the last gambling session I played poker. I am not sure that there were no bots among the players, but there were real people for sure.

Before last gambling session I dedicated to slots, which as well as many other gamblers are addicted to at a time when my country had casinos in every neighborhood.  

[Oilacris]

1. Casino A - is on what we are commonly seeing today and whats been commonly offered.Why? these are games that would be having house edge and this is something which
gambling company owners would really much prefer considering that fastness of games been done and which means that revenue would really be also that fast.

2. Casino B- there are some sites who do offer but eventually not really getting that much attention. Not because house doesnt really like to offer up these games
but rather people do only stick into those instantaneous type of games which they could see the results in a blink of an eye which means
that it does have lesser demands for these pvp type.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

While A is base on luck, B is base on skill, and I guess that's the kind of game any skillful player will like to gamble over, because when it comes to playing B, a gambler has either 50% chance of either winning or losing, unlike A where the gambler only has like 0.1% chance of winning and 99.9% chance of losing. But not forgetting the fact if you are lucky enough playing A, you can win huge, unlike B that if he/she is skillful enough can still always work home with good sum of money too.
So it depends on individual personality

[crzy]

Can you add another option?
Because the problem of PvP is finding your opponent which can be a problem to site if they focus on that, so better to have a PvP game option and the usual casino games to make the site more fun to play and to gamble. Some gamblers are not a gamer they didn’t want to compete on their own, they just want to place a bet and wait for the result.

[o48o]

-cut-
If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

Occasionally i am playing pvp games like poker. But turns out i am not build for it and get bored easily. So i would have to play several tables at once. But when i do play over 3 tables i get too distracted and it's harder to take breaks. I don't know what game you mean by race cars but monopoly should be fun for real money.

However in reality i stick to gambling in sports and slots so i would pick A. I've been thinking i should try out table card games against the house too but i am not so excited about the fact theres no change hitting jackpot.

[dunfida]

Can you add another option?
Because the problem of PvP is finding your opponent which can be a problem to site if they focus on that, so better to have a PvP game option and the usual casino games to make the site more fun to play and to gamble. Some gamblers are not a gamer they didn’t want to compete on their own, they just want to place a bet and wait for the result.

Also not all does have the patience on dealing up with games which it is really giving out that kind of long result and would rather they would really be liking on having those instant results which could be only found on dice,roulettes and crash games and not into those typical pvp types like card games and other similar stuffs.This is why it do always falls down on someomes interest and preference and this is where the market
would really be basing on where is really the demand.If they do saw that there's something lacking then for sure they would really be putting more focus on that one.
Every section does have its own market where businesses whether would be trying to cope up or not.

[goinmerry]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?

PVP gaming or PVP type of gambling is just a usual gambling type you encounter in the gambling world.

Is it fun? Obviously, the answer will vary for a person that "likes" it or "dislike" it. We all have our own preferences in the first place.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

With that amount, I don't want to bother with skill-based games at those mentioned games where I'm not sure if all users in the room are legit players.

I will go all-in in playing slots and hope that luck will come to my side. No hassle, just tap that spin button.

[Guzter]

This questions and comparison between pvp and casino games might not be fair, and this is because -
Pvp games requires a good level of skill to be able to win, while casino games on the other hand is purely luck based, those who lack the skill to challenge or play against other gamblers will definitely settle for casino games, while those who have the skill winning the game requires will choose to settle with pvp games..

But if I was asked to make a choice as to which I think is more fun to play, I would prefer pvp games over casino games, I think nothing is more fun in gambling than challenging other players.

So, each has their own community.

[Guzter]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

While A is base on luck, B is base on skill, and I guess that's the kind of game any skillful player will like to gamble over, because when it comes to playing B, a gambler has either 50% chance of either winning or losing, unlike A where the gambler only has like 0.1% chance of winning and 99.9% chance of losing. But not forgetting the fact if you are lucky enough playing A, you can win huge, unlike B that if he/she is skillful enough can still always work home with good sum of money too.
So it depends on individual personality

And where do you see yourself fitting most?

[Guzter]

PVP gaming is really a thing but only for those who are skilled enough in that particular and specific game.

Not all do have those skills that's why others preferred just playing the usual casino games and find their luck. PVP type of gaming is also for experienced ones that a pre-knowledge about the game is really necessary before anyone wants to compete with others with stake money.

There are also games that might be prone to some cheats or any sort of game bot e.g chess, checkers, pool, billiards etc. and we don't know if we are against a real human or a bot.

PvP type of game is very competitive and it can be very annoying losing consistently because your opponent is a guru in the making and that alone can make you feel bad making adjustments. There are so persons thatmight find it very interesting because they are playing with a real human not against computer that could limit the chances of players winning at random.

I would prefer the pvp if I am playing with little fund because I wouldn't want to make the mistake of taking the risk of losing money easily without knowing how good and experienced the person I am playing with good be.

So basically wager small, till you figure out how good you are in comparison to the rest of the people you matched against?

[robelneo]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

You should have set up a poll for this to see the numbers on who's in favor of A or B or both I prefer A because we are playing in the casino not only to be entertained but also to win a big amount of money but by picking your B you'll only get your opponent's buy-in amounts, so you're earning is limited and it's a good feeling if you can beat the house, not just one player, it will get you motivated to play more.

[Jemzx00]

For a pure fun experience, I would choose the first option which is Casino A as most of the games included in it are Luck- Based games which for me is the main purpose of gambling itself. However, there are some games included on Casino B that may be a PVP type of game but also depends on luck such as card games like poker.

For a competitive gameplay experience, Casino B would be the best pick as it will depend on the skills of each player itself whether they may have a chance of winning or not. I try to avoid these type of games as you'll often encounter very good player which only focuses on one game like Pool. I tried playing on a local Pool near me for fun and included some bets on it, but I was obliterated by their experience and skills.

[ralle14]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

I would quickly choose casino A because even though all of these games aren't PvP games, they're still much more convenient to play and they don't require another person to play with.

I still enjoy playing PvP games but I don't have the best experience with them since I don't play Poker that much and then the other option to experience PvP is through contests which are rarely enjoyable. If both of them are on the same level then I would switch my pick to casino B but for now, I'll stay with casino A.

[goinmerry]

I try to avoid these type of games as you'll often encounter very good player which only focuses on one game like Pool. I tried playing on a local Pool near me for fun and included some bets on it, but I was obliterated by their experience and skills.

And because skills are necessary as every player is competitive, just imagine the difficulty to win especially in a tournament.

Regardless of how much is the prize pool, expect professional players that will join the tournament. Even though we are skilled and good at that game, there's always a player that is higher beyond our skills, and that makes the competition not balanced.

That ends up with some gamblers just staying on the usual casino games and won't bother to join PVP games even though they know and are skilled in how to play the game. Better not messed up with the pros and increase the risks of losing.

[Guzter]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

You should have set up a poll for this to see the numbers on who's in favor of A or B or both I prefer A because we are playing in the casino not only to be entertained but also to win a big amount of money but by picking your B you'll only get your opponent's buy-in amounts, so you're earning is limited and it's a good feeling if you can beat the house, not just one player, it will get you motivated to play more.

Ok, I just added a poll.

[Guzter]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

If both of them are on the same level then I would switch my pick to casino B but for now, I'll stay with casino A.

What do you mean by "on the same level"?

[coin-investor]

I prefer option A playing in a casino although your chances are not high compared to option B is rewarding if you are lucky to hit the jackpot its more challenging because you are up against big odds, although option B is also good if you are good at some of the games you can also test your skill against a human being it's a different experience between the two on Option A you need skill and luck on Option B you need skill to beat your opponent, I still haven't tried option B on all the casinos I'm playing so far.

[DoublerHunter]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

I would quickly choose casino A because even though all of these games aren't PvP games, they're still much more convenient to play and they don't require another person to play with.

~snip~

^That is definitely right, it requires waiting for a player that you can play which feels boring to me.
Though PVP is still good if your friend and you have the same vacant time to gamble how does possible if both of you got work and a busy life every day and don't have the same vacant time to gamble? If you have that small amount of $10–$100, I prefer to gamble against the house edge, which is you are not required to wait for another player at your convenient time.
I choose casino A.

[goinmerry]

What do you mean by "on the same level"?

It has something to do with the fairness of matchmaking.

Basically, same level = same tier, which means we are competing with a user that might have the same performance as us and not against professional or highly skilled ones. It's more balanced and that's what PVP should be in the usual game. Tournaments should also have limits like there's only a minimum or maximum level or rank that is required to join. In that way, every participant has at least a chance to win.

P.S. Please don't multi-post. Just edit your recent post and include all your replies in those multi-quotes.

[GxSTxV]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.

I opened a topic here recently about this kind of games i just didn’t find the exact name for them and if they are considered as gambling, Some people were saying it’s gambling while others doesn’t agree since you are doing efforts and the game play requires skills in order to make and take your prize. For me i will prefer Casino B since i may have some skills in Fps games and have fun playing them so why not adding more action and fun to it by gambling some dollars to win. I have tried a third party platform that organize games and competitions in famous and popular games such as counter strike, PUBG, 8ball pool…. Both players who want to gamble should pay the platform for example 10dollars and an agent will be watching that game to see result and also detect hackers and cheaters if there’s any then send the prize to the winner in exchange for some fees that the platform take, and in my opinion it’s better than a casino to build all the games

[AmoreJaz]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

I would quickly choose casino A because even though all of these games aren't PvP games, they're still much more convenient to play and they don't require another person to play with.

~snip~

^That is definitely right, it requires waiting for a player that you can play which feels boring to me.
Though PVP is still good if your friend and you have the same vacant time to gamble how does possible if both of you got work and a busy life every day and don't have the same vacant time to gamble? If you have that small amount of $10–$100, I prefer to gamble against the house edge, which is you are not required to wait for another player at your convenient time.
I choose casino A.

Casino A would be the most choice of people on here on this forum and its quite relevant and obviously could be seen if we do consider on how many gambling platforms that we do have in the market then we
can say that lots of people are really that interested when it comes to  casino games which are against house edge.Its true that if you do really have some ample time and moment that you could
play against other people on the said moment but most of us does really like to play on fast manner or something that doesnt involved other people.
We do love on having that direct deposit and play right away.

what i noticed about most pvp gaming platforms is they can't sustain the interest of players, hence, hard to keep afloat with their business. not many gamblers are also into this type of gaming in long-term basis. maybe just to change the environment but later on most are still going to classic games as they don't need to bother other people, just play on their own. the dilemma with pvp games is the waiting time for the game to get started. and we know, most gamblers have very short patience.

[Yaunfitda]

I will choose 1. Casino A:

I'm a sucker for casino slots, table card games, dice, craps, and roulette. I'm not that familiar with PVP games although I heard about it but I'm not that interested. And I do agree that these kind of games are not going to be sustainable for casinos as players might be few and individuals are easy to get bored unless a new PVP games comes along, this kind of games might lost the interest of the players very quickly.

[Quidat]

I will choose 1. Casino A:

I'm a sucker for casino slots, table card games, dice, craps, and roulette. I'm not that familiar with PVP games although I heard about it but I'm not that interested. And I do agree that these kind of games are not going to be sustainable for casinos as players might be few and individuals are easy to get bored unless a new PVP games comes along, this kind of games might lost the interest of the players very quickly.

If Pvp games does impose high interest then we would see lots of sites offering these games but we are seeing the opposite which it does obviously means that they arent that good enough.
It do always boils down on someones preference whether they would really be liking some pvp games which there are platforms who do offer such games but mostly
we are seeing casino games which are luck based where i couldnt really blame out people because it is really that entertaining and something you could
enjoy.

[ralle14]

What do you mean by "on the same level"?

I'm referring to the quality of the casinos because not all casinos have the same amount of players and that could potentially affect the gambling experience when you're playing in Casino B.

If both casinos are on equal footing then the gambling experience would probably be on par with Casino A. Others might disagree and I don't mind, the only reason why I said it is because of my past experience as it's so rare to see PvP casinos thrive and have other games aside from Poker.

[taufik123]

-snip-
There's also a thing with practice. Would you allow players to play without wagering, just to get to know the game and get better at it before they make their bets? If you do, you'll end up with people experimenting with various tactics and you give them more time to find glitches and bugs they can later use against other players. If you don't do it, the only way to get better would be to put money into the game, so people ready to put a lot of time and money into the game ultimately win more, which makes it a pay to win game.

Like the demo on the gambling Pvp game. This will provide an opportunity for all players to try how to play the game perfectly and be aware of every problem and some bugs that may be found. This will indeed give early players access to experience the game without the need to bet. But preferably, some features must be locked so that you cannot access all game features, if you want to play in full, use several minimum bets to play it. Putting money into the game is a condition that can be done so that players don't just try the PVP game so that there is income to be received from early players.
Currently, there are many cheaters and game crackers who are looking for loopholes in every game, so the game system really has to be built properly.

That said, I'd still choose B, if the game was well made.

But I'm more interested in Casino A.
Gambling is synonymous with big wins or Jackpots, so the opportunity to win some big money can be a more desirable attraction with several bets to be made.

[danherbias07]

I prefer letter B. PVP gaming but the only downside is the waiting time on when a player will come in. That's where it becomes a boring game because gamblers have a tendency to just look for another game if they find the wait is too long.
Whatever the PVP game is, it should aim for popularity first like the one kids are playing now, MOBA games. It's a different era now, the shift from traditional gambling card games to android battle arena games soared to an extent that they will choose playing skill-based free games and just gamble with friends instead.
If there is one that had not been kicked out of the picture, it's just poker. IMO.

[xSkylarx]

Looking on the probability of winning on those choices the Letter B is more preferrable because you have a chance to win and you can control the game if you are good on those games and also if PVP game it would be fast game and at the same time enjoyable. Though whether what is the best , it is still good to have implement those options because there are people prefer the other choice as they don't match well to those PVP players.

[btc78]

Is PvP gaming a thing?


2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

If that is the only capital to put in? then I chose gambling 2 because I will at least enjoy and have happy time before losing 

but if given a chance? I would choose both , I love luck base gambling and I also love playing sports game.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I don't know, apart from poker, the options of B, well apart from Monopoly but I didn't know you could play in the casino as well. I suppose the best thing would be to have both options mixed in the casino and try them out, but if I had to choose one I would go for B, because in PVP games you can win in the long run if you are better than your opponents.

For me, I believe slot games are much better, as they are more entertaining, have less pressure & stress, and gives you the chance to turn small bet into a large chunk of money.

Yes, the good thing about them is that you don't have to think, you spin it and see what comes out. That's what I've been playing the most lately.

[len01]

-

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


-

although these few weeks I like to bet on casino A but I prefer to choose for casino B
I'm not comparing A and B because both will return to their respective fortunes.
casino A has a chance of winning big amount of money but the chance of lucky is small. but in casino B the chances of winning big or small amount of money depends on the size of the bet but the chance of luck is bigger.
I argue like that because in PVP games we already know which team or group has a good way of playing or is a popular team that often wins. so there is a very big chance of winning the bet.

[ethereumhunter]

PvP games mean something because we can compete with other people for victory. We can also learn something that we can get from the game to improve the skills we have so that they are even better. And it will be fun to play with other people and compete with them and it will be more fun if we play with our friends.

But I don't play with friends too often and tend to gamble alone in my room. So I chose casino A because I play Slot games a lot.

[jrrsparkles]

Personally I would like to play pvp games in general because it gives more satisfaction that we won against someone in this world so my pick will be definitely B irrespective of the winning amount. I don't see much of pvp casino games apart from poker so the main scope for pvp betting is in the sport betting especially esports where one play against other or team to win the game.

[iv4n]

I like both options, I'm familiar with all those games... some of them I still actively play, while some I haven't played in a long time. Lately, I have mostly been choosing option A, which means playing slots, dices, limbo, roulette, etc. I don't have a lot of time, so those games suit me better. I can simply start and quit at any moment without any penalties.
As for option B, apart from poker, I didn't see that we can play other games for money anywhere... sure it would be interesting to have a larger selection of PvP games and casinos that offer them, but I can't say that I have seen any "serious" project in crypto space.

[Mauser]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

I would go for casino B as most people here on the forum it seems. Poker is my favourite card game that I have been playing a lot since I was 18. During university I spend so many evenings drinking and playing with friends, it was the best time. I still remember visiting my first casino and taking part in a poker tournament, or going the first time to Las Vegas and seeing the big casinos. Roulette and Black Jack are also fun for me and I play them regularly, but if I had to choose between all the games I would always pick Poker first. Also 100 USD is my usual bankroll with what I start in poker, it's a the best amount for me where I don't feel bad losing a few all ins and you are still very happy when making a profit. All the other games you mentioned here like Rummy or Monopoly I played a lot too, but never for money. Would be nice to see such games in an active casino environment with a lot of players playing for money.

[Jawhead999]

I will choose casino C where I betting indirectly against the other bettors, it's sport betting

Casino A mostly the gambler will lose since the house edge make the casino always win, while Casino C every gamblers will try their best to win the game, so we will face many professional gambler and it's not easy to beat them. We can only pray to match up with newbie gambler which gambling because of curiosity and doesn't know how to play lol.

[piebeyb]

I will choose B to play with my opponent and to win only using skill and accuracy to be a winner without having to hope for luck, while for A we play fate against the house and it will be difficult to get victory even though we have many millions of strategies because the house will always win in the end

[Betwrong]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
~

PvP gaming is definitely a thing, and I know gamblers who would prefer playing dice against others instead of against  the house, and even with slots people organize local tournaments against each other, so, again, I'm sure people are always interested in PvP games.

As of me, I used to love poker tournaments, but I can't play in them these days because of the electricity shortages, so right now I would prefer playing Slot games with my $10–$100, as you asking in the OP. And, actually, I love playing slots. When a poker tournament starts you know exactly what is the maximum amount that you can win. With slots it's different, and it's more thrilling.

[libert19]

I'd go with second option as I find pvp games more fun, but it can be tad bit slow compared to playing vs the house.

[348Judah]

I will like to say that deciding for option A or B is on the gambler's decision since he has his own preferred choice when it comes to selecting games, as for me i will prefer having a challenge with a gambler to play and determines who wins over each other, why i like this is because it will help me to understand myself the better in certain abilities in gambling and got myself equiped for subsequent encounters on such challenge, this is actually fun to me and i wouldn't like to accept defeat but always keep trying to be on top.

[danherbias07]

I will choose casino C where I betting indirectly against the other bettors, it's sport betting

Casino A mostly the gambler will lose since the house edge make the casino always win, while Casino C every gamblers will try their best to win the game, so we will face many professional gambler and it's not easy to beat them. We can only pray to match up with newbie gambler which gambling because of curiosity and doesn't know how to play lol.

Bro, you got me there, I remember answering OP's question and there's no choice of Letter C.   You made me look back at the first post just to re-check the OP.
Anyway, OP should've also input the sports betting thing as I am also a gambler in that industry. I prefer it rather than casino games, although I still play some of them if I want to increase my funds. (if I get lucky) It may be part PVP, part casino, as the bookies are still the ones who will set the favorites and underdogs while the bettors will try to battle who will be the winner against two teams. I will definitely pick that too, if that is part of the choices.

[Kakmakr]

The thing with PvP is this....

It gets farmed to death, if there are no system to sort the newbies from the experts. You have to implement some sort of ranking system to determine which players can compete against what kind of level of experience.. to make things fair.

You cannot have pro poker players competing against newbies, because the pro players will simply wipe them out. I have seen this happening with "Chess" PvP games .... but I think people cheated with computer chess assistance.   (Cheaters)

[pawel7777]

Does anyone know if there are actually any P Vs P games that players can put something at stake and compete against others to win the pot? I'm not talking about strictly gambling games like poker and alike, but more about the 'traditional' games like e.g. car racing etc.

The concept seems so simple that I would be surprised if nobody came up with it so far, but then again, I'm massively out of the loop in terms of video games.

Any links and opinions are welcome.

[madnessteat]

The thing with PvP is this....

It gets farmed to death, if there are no system to sort the newbies from the experts. You have to implement some sort of ranking system to determine which players can compete against what kind of level of experience.. to make things fair.

You cannot have pro poker players competing against newbies, because the pro players will simply wipe them out. I have seen this happening with "Chess" PvP games .... but I think people cheated with computer chess assistance.  (Cheaters)

In my opinion, playing chess online is crazy because the probability that your opponent uses AI is very high. Money games imply that players will cheat if there is such an opportunity. In online chess, such opportunities exist until both players are closely monitored. Otherwise, you will just lose your money.

[molsewid]

Does anyone know if there are actually any P Vs P games that players can put something at stake and compete against others to win the pot? I'm not talking about strictly gambling games like poker and alike, but more about the 'traditional' games like e.g. car racing etc.

The concept seems so simple that I would be surprised if nobody came up with it so far, but then again, I'm massively out of the loop in terms of video games.

Any links and opinions are welcome.

I don't where you can find them online but in pvp personally i think there will some people for that of course and yes I don't know why it is not yet popular it will be good in sports and esports as well . Or maybe I don't know it yet? is there a cons for this for PVP? i am very interested with this one, maybe if there's no casino implemented for this maybe I will try to make on in the future.

[famososMuertos]

The thing with PvP is this....

It gets farmed to death, if there are no system to sort the newbies from the experts. You have to implement some sort of ranking system to determine which players can compete against what kind of level of experience.. to make things fair.

You cannot have pro poker players competing against newbies, because the pro players will simply wipe them out. I have seen this happening with "Chess" PvP games .... but I think people cheated with computer chess assistance.  (Cheaters)

In my opinion, playing chess online is crazy because the probability that your opponent uses AI is very high. Money games imply that players will cheat if there is such an opportunity. In online chess, such opportunities exist until both players are closely monitored. Otherwise, you will just lose your money.

In the case of chess it depends on which "club" you start a game!!

In the case of poker, which is most widely used in casinos, it usually happens that (sometimes) you don't play with a user who really claim to be... And in fact, it has already happened in the past where professionals face each other and then one of those involved has confessed to playing in Team mode against another player. The same can happen in Chess, not necessarily with AI.

That in itself is what keeps the quality of those who face off and the money that is involved in trust as a priority, when they happen online there are many computer resources to have matches in the balance of honesty and trust.

[klidex]

Does anyone know if there are actually any P Vs P games that players can put something at stake and compete against others to win the pot? I'm not talking about strictly gambling games like poker and alike, but more about the 'traditional' games like e.g. car racing etc.

The concept seems so simple that I would be surprised if nobody came up with it so far, but then again, I'm massively out of the loop in terms of video games.

Any links and opinions are welcome.

I don't know and have never found a game that is played on a P vs P basis or competes between gamblers with other gamblers to win bets in the game like what you have said.
As far as I know, car racing is indeed a betting option in casinos, but this race is not a game, but a real racing event conducted by professional racers.
If in a casino there is a game like that it might be very fun when betting and being able to play directly against other bettors and can create special interest for gamblers to participate in playing.

[QueenVera]

I would prefer B whenever I want a real time challenging game and I also don't want to feel cheated. Basically I do more of casinos because everyone wants to win big and most times the fist option with casino A is one of the ways to achieving such wins but in situations where I want to actually face real time players and calculate real time wins, then I simply just stick with pvp games because it also seems more fair to me when playing with pvp games.
But generally I don't have a certain choice of game and the game I play most times depends on the situation and the need to play.

[harizen]

Does anyone know if there are actually any P Vs P games that players can put something at stake and compete against others to win the pot? I'm not talking about strictly gambling games like poker and alike, but more about the 'traditional' games like e.g. car racing etc

I believed referring to the crypto-gambling platform, there wasn't much demand or maybe close to zero. Not sure though.

But for the sake of giving some example, the 8-ball Mini pool (formerly in Miniclip) does have a tournament where users need to stake some chips (or gold?) where the real money is needed to purchase those.

Should be just for fun but there's a time that it's addictive as it can also be played locally between circles of friends with real money.

[rahmad2nd]

~snip~

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

I will not turn down for something new. however, that doesn't mean I'll just forget the previous one. In the world of casino entertainment, you can't generalize to everyone and everyone has things they enjoy doing. if I'm interested in casino A, it doesn't mean I don't play at casino B. Casino A offers something that I enjoy. whether it's baccarat, dice, slots, roulette and even sportsbook betting.

On the other hand, the type of casino game B that you mentioned is not something new, I think PVP games will be more than that.  I really don't know about the mechanics of how it works, how to bet and what types of games are offered. as one of our members mentioned, the type that interests us is PVP games that are designed and played like MMORPGs.

[virasisog]

I personally prefer B because it is more challenging to play against skilled opponents and those who are also looking for thrill and excitement. Playing for the pot prize would be a big challenge for players who only want to enjoy and feel entertained and win the goal at the same time. Pvp games could be skilled based on some chances and specific strategies could be applied so I find it more interesting though I also play with normal casino games sometimes.

[goinmerry]

I personally prefer B because it is more challenging to play against skilled opponents and those who are also looking for thrill and excitement. Playing for the pot prize would be a big challenge for players who only want to enjoy and feel entertained and win the goal at the same time. Pvp games could be skilled based on some chances and specific strategies could be applied so I find it more interesting though I also play with normal casino games sometimes.

PVP games are really interesting if we are talking about a game that we really know well and are familiar with the strategies that can be applied. But in this type of game, keep in mind that even how good you are, there are still good players above you that might join that tournament with a big prize.

If a gambling platform will push that kind of gambling, the allowed players per tier should somehow be equal in performance to prevent newbies, semi-skilled, skilled, and professional players to meet each other on their way up. Though it can't assure how balanced it will be, at least it's one step to make the game more accessible to a different types of players.

[Mahanton]

I personally prefer B because it is more challenging to play against skilled opponents and those who are also looking for thrill and excitement. Playing for the pot prize would be a big challenge for players who only want to enjoy and feel entertained and win the goal at the same time. Pvp games could be skilled based on some chances and specific strategies could be applied so I find it more interesting though I also play with normal casino games sometimes.

PVP games are really interesting if we are talking about a game that we really know well and are familiar with the strategies that can be applied. But in this type of game, keep in mind that even how good you are, there are still good players above you that might join that tournament with a big prize.

If a gambling platform will push that kind of gambling, the allowed players per tier should somehow be equal in performance to prevent newbies, semi-skilled, skilled, and professional players to meet each other on their way up. Though it can't assure how balanced it will be, at least it's one step to make the game more accessible to a different types of players.

So there should be some sort of category which i do highly agree on that because if you do make out a general room where all players could join in then those professionals or experts could easily milk out those people who would really be tending to join up.Categories could be classified basing up on the amount of bet that would be put up on a particular room which would indicate your expertise level which it is really should be a standard thing.It would be good that someday this option is something that could really be seen commonly because if we do at now on which it is really that hard to be seen.
Why? Its because of the demand on which we can really see that only a few whose really that interested into this one.

[Erumo]

My choice is to gamble against other person instead of gambling against script. Reason for that is simple - it is easier to win. While script calculated millions of ways how situation would go, slots has algorithms and etc, playing against a human is always easy. Such game is unpredictable. If we take poker, a human can drop AA if his opponent bluffs. The machine will never do that. Gambling against human is always fun. The machine will never tell you a joke, even if it looses, it will never gets enraged.

[Viscore]

PvP games mean something because we can compete with other people for victory. We can also learn something that we can get from the game to improve the skills we have so that they are even better. And it will be fun to play with other people and compete with them and it will be more fun if we play with our friends.

But I don't play with friends too often and tend to gamble alone in my room. So I chose casino A because I play Slot games a lot.

PvP games have considered a norm today especially with the young gamers playing around, as this could help them develop more of their talents and skills, and to enhance more of their socialization practices. However, regular gamblers may not be quite interested in that kind of games, just like myself I still prefer to play with casino games like slot and poker. That’s where I think it’s more profitable and more entertaining for me.

[ethereumhunter]

PvP games mean something because we can compete with other people for victory. We can also learn something that we can get from the game to improve the skills we have so that they are even better. And it will be fun to play with other people and compete with them and it will be more fun if we play with our friends.

But I don't play with friends too often and tend to gamble alone in my room. So I chose casino A because I play Slot games a lot.

PvP games have considered a norm today especially with the young gamers playing around, as this could help them develop more of their talents and skills, and to enhance more of their socialization practices. However, regular gamblers may not be quite interested in that kind of games, just like myself I still prefer to play with casino games like slot and poker. That’s where I think it’s more profitable and more entertaining for me.

And for this PvP game, I've only ever seen a few young players playing games like Mobile Legends and the like but never seen several people playing gambling together using the same game. In my opinion, playing gambling is like doing private activities with no one knowing what we are doing, so we are alone in one room. And it can really provide fun, tension, and whatnot and it's a mixed feeling because we're experiencing it firsthand.

[TheGreatPython]

Is PvP gaming a thing?

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

If that is the only capital to put in? then I chose gambling 2 because I will at least enjoy and have happy time before losing  

but if given a chance? I would choose both , I love luck base gambling and I also love playing sports game.

What do you mean by the only capital? Maybe you mean to say only game? Because any capital (small or big) it's still up to us if what kind of game we are going to choose and play. There were also lots of casinos invented now so you shouldn't only limit yourself on one to two casino especially if they only have limited amount of games. However no doubt that PVP games are more enjoyable because your skills are being tested here.

If you are weak, you can always practice to improve your skill and beat your opponent the next time you face them again. There are people who are versatile and can play different kind of games if they will get bored with the other so it's also a good idea to combine all three (PVP, sports and luck based games) under one roof.

[romero121]

PvP games mean something because we can compete with other people for victory. We can also learn something that we can get from the game to improve the skills we have so that they are even better. And it will be fun to play with other people and compete with them and it will be more fun if we play with our friends.

But I don't play with friends too often and tend to gamble alone in my room. So I chose casino A because I play Slot games a lot.

PvP games have considered a norm today especially with the young gamers playing around, as this could help them develop more of their talents and skills, and to enhance more of their socialization practices. However, regular gamblers may not be quite interested in that kind of games, just like myself I still prefer to play with casino games like slot and poker. That’s where I think it’s more profitable and more entertaining for me.

And for this PvP game, I've only ever seen a few young players playing games like Mobile Legends and the like but never seen several people playing gambling together using the same game. In my opinion, playing gambling is like doing private activities with no one knowing what we are doing, so we are alone in one room. And it can really provide fun, tension, and whatnot and it's a mixed feeling because we're experiencing it firsthand.

Not everyone are good in playing PvP games. In particular nowadays the PvP games are much of shooting games. To me Chess or some form of the skill based gambling could interest me in playing PvP games. This too won't happen long, my major spending will be on the slot, dice and casino games as I'm much used to it. In between when the casino games isn't much into winning can give a a try on PvP games.

[Porfirii]

I guess that this has much to do with the individual's personality, and that it is somehow related to locus of control: People who usually think that most things happen to them because of external factors (chance, other's influence, etc.) might be predisposed to choose A, while people who think that everything that happens to them is mainly due to his ability or fault might choose B instead.

Nobody perceives control fully internal or external, of course, but I'm sure that these personal beliefs condition one's behaviour. What do you think?

[Bitinity]

I was in the B for few years long time ago when I loved to play poker in online poker casinos but since few years back especially when I knew crypto gambling for the 1st time, I prefer to be in the A. I was in B because I had a lot of free time as a college student, but I have less free time since graduation due to Job and now I have even less free time because I have my own small family. With this situation, Casino A is the best choice since I can play it anytime I wish whenever I have free time while it wont be possible for Casino B since playing pvp games especially poker take more time.

[slaman29]

I guess that this has much to do with the individual's personality, and that it is somehow related to locus of control: People who usually think that most things happen to them because of external factors (chance, other's influence, etc.) might be predisposed to choose A, while people who think that everything that happens to them is mainly due to his ability or fault might choose B instead.

Nobody perceives control fully internal or external, of course, but I'm sure that these personal beliefs condition one's behaviour. What do you think?

First time I've heard of this locus of control but the concept isn't new to me. I've mentioned before in old threads of an old strategy to increase control.

We all know as individuals we can't really predict our level of control right? But if you have a second person watching, and in return you watch the second person, you have an influence on control of both sides. Like a buddy system

[Cling18]

I'm not good at playing PVP games because I failed several times I tried it. I think it's because I didn't develop gaming skills since I wasn't into gaming when I was younger but so far, I enjoy playing option A. I could feel luckier when playing in slots and Fortunejack. It still has a risk but I find it more interesting. Well, we all have our own preferences based on our interest but for me, things will also depend on our luck.

[jakelyson]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

I would choose B. There is added competitiveness and excitement when you are playing against other people rather than a machine. Most of us are social people and having someone to communicate with and even trash talk against gives added value to the games in the casino.

I'm not good at playing PVP games because I failed several times I tried it. I think it's because I didn't develop gaming skills since I wasn't into gaming when I was younger but so far, I enjoy playing option A. I could feel luckier when playing in slots and Fortunejack. It still has a risk but I find it more interesting. Well, we all have our own preferences based on our interest but for me, things will also depend on our luck.

We are the complete opposite since I do not feel that I am lucky enough to win big on luck-based games in casinos. That is why I would choose PvP over normal casino games but of course I still play them from time to time whether to destress or simply pass the time by.

[Ararbermas]

Seems the same thing for me, but of course casino A is much better and more fun in my personal opinion. Because you can literally enjoy the game and its not stressful compared to the second option. Imagine you don't know how good your opponent to a particular game and the question on that as well is if it's real person behind or just a bot.  What if? For sure you will end up losses afterwards. Lol

[Porfirii]

I guess that this has much to do with the individual's personality, and that it is somehow related to locus of control: People who usually think that most things happen to them because of external factors (chance, other's influence, etc.) might be predisposed to choose A, while people who think that everything that happens to them is mainly due to his ability or fault might choose B instead.

Nobody perceives control fully internal or external, of course, but I'm sure that these personal beliefs condition one's behaviour. What do you think?

First time I've heard of this locus of control but the concept isn't new to me. I've mentioned before in old threads of an old strategy to increase control.

We all know as individuals we can't really predict our level of control right? But if you have a second person watching, and in return you watch the second person, you have an influence on control of both sides. Like a buddy system

I'm glad I helped you learn something new! although you already knew about the idea or concept itself described by the term. About the threads you mention, you have piqued my curiosity. Could you share some links to those threads so that I can deepen my knowledge on the subject? I don't fully understand what you talk about with that buddy system but it sounds interesting.

[Agbe]

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

Your topical sentence (question) is not clear to me and concerning to the second sentence, I will say yes because if you in casino space to play against another person, you won't see the play and only representative of the player in the game and believe before you play the game with the stranger the management of the casino has don all the necessary requirements for the both players, I mean the deposits and placing the bet to start the game so anyone loses, the winner collect all. As for me I like the B Because the B is real Fun even though you loss out at least you play with human and not computer. I love PvP games more than PvE games.

[darewaller]

PvP games mean something because we can compete with other people for victory. We can also learn something that we can get from the game to improve the skills we have so that they are even better. And it will be fun to play with other people and compete with them and it will be more fun if we play with our friends.

But I don't play with friends too often and tend to gamble alone in my room. So I chose casino A because I play Slot games a lot.

PvP games have considered a norm today especially with the young gamers playing around, as this could help them develop more of their talents and skills, and to enhance more of their socialization practices. However, regular gamblers may not be quite interested in that kind of games, just like myself I still prefer to play with casino games like slot and poker. That’s where I think it’s more profitable and more entertaining for me.

It became more possible with the help of cheap smartphones and affordable internet. It's good how things evolved but it's bad at the same time because a lot of people especially the kids are now addicted with it. It will only be beneficial depending on what type of PVP game they are playing.

If we want to enhance our socialization skills then there is a better way of doing it. That is by going outside and talk directly or face to face. Not something online or through the help of social media platforms. You mentioned poker in one of the games you play but I think poker can be considered as a PVP too because you are facing other people and not bots.

[n0ne]

Seems the same thing for me, but of course casino A is much better and more fun in my personal opinion. Because you can literally enjoy the game and its not stressful compared to the second option. Imagine you don't know how good your opponent to a particular game and the question on that as well is if it's real person behind or just a bot.  What if? For sure you will end up losses afterwards. Lol

When we play against player, surely there arise a question. Whether it is a real player or not? Maybe the confused mind itself keep your game down. Better is to enjoy the casino games that gives excitement as well as disappointment. My choice is Casino A and I'm surprised to see the voting is high for the Casino B.

[harizen]

When we play against player, surely there arise a question. Whether it is a real player or not? Maybe the confused mind itself keep your game down. Better is to enjoy the casino games that gives excitement as well as disappointment. My choice is Casino A and I'm surprised to see the voting is high for the Casino B.

This is always my concerned. PvP games are more prone to cheating and there's no way we can determine if we are up against a real human.

Like in chess games, there are lots of bots designed here and for average users, no way they can win against a bot.

Maybe the reputation of the platform will be the only basis if we are playing with fair competition in a certain PvP match.

[goinmerry]

It became more possible with the help of cheap smartphones and affordable internet. It's good how things evolved but it's bad at the same time because a lot of people especially the kids are now addicted with it. It will only be beneficial depending on what type of PVP game they are playing.

Don't take that addiction purely as negative as sometimes, there are people especially minors who use their addiction to their advantage. If you are following some E-sports competitions, the average age of the team's players can be considered minor.

Although as a guardian or parents, they should be responsible for where their young ones going on a path. If addiction is leading to the worst, they have to step up immediately and do the necessary things to fix the problem early.

[ethereumhunter]

PvP games mean something because we can compete with other people for victory. We can also learn something that we can get from the game to improve the skills we have so that they are even better. And it will be fun to play with other people and compete with them and it will be more fun if we play with our friends.

But I don't play with friends too often and tend to gamble alone in my room. So I chose casino A because I play Slot games a lot.

PvP games have considered a norm today especially with the young gamers playing around, as this could help them develop more of their talents and skills, and to enhance more of their socialization practices. However, regular gamblers may not be quite interested in that kind of games, just like myself I still prefer to play with casino games like slot and poker. That’s where I think it’s more profitable and more entertaining for me.

And for this PvP game, I've only ever seen a few young players playing games like Mobile Legends and the like but never seen several people playing gambling together using the same game. In my opinion, playing gambling is like doing private activities with no one knowing what we are doing, so we are alone in one room. And it can really provide fun, tension, and whatnot and it's a mixed feeling because we're experiencing it firsthand.

Not everyone are good in playing PvP games. In particular nowadays the PvP games are much of shooting games. To me Chess or some form of the skill based gambling could interest me in playing PvP games. This too won't happen long, my major spending will be on the slot, dice and casino games as I'm much used to it. In between when the casino games isn't much into winning can give a a try on PvP games.

If it were a PvP game, people would choose a game they could be interested in and many started playing it after they saw their friends playing together. It is a good idea to try playing PvP games after we have finished playing casino games and it could be a way to relieve stress after playing them. Maybe Monopoly can provide a different experience from slot games because we can try playing with other people.

[tabas]

I enjoy dice, poker and sports betting. So, that will be a mixed up choice and there's no specific choice for me because with all of them, I'm enjoying.

This is always my concerned. PvP games are more prone to cheating and there's no way we can determine if we are up against a real human.

Like in chess games, there are lots of bots designed here and for average users, no way they can win against a bot.

Maybe the reputation of the platform will be the only basis if we are playing with fair competition in a certain PvP match.

This is a legit concern and that's why we don't usually other usual PvP games because of the possibility that the games might be cheated with anyone who has developed some cheats against their opponents. But as for enjoyment, all of them are enjoyable to gamble with but we just have different tastes when it's come to games that we want to play.

[rahmad2nd]

If it were a PvP game, people would choose a game they could be interested in and many started playing it after they saw their friends playing together. It is a good idea to try playing PvP games after we have finished playing casino games and it could be a way to relieve stress after playing them. Maybe Monopoly can provide a different experience from slot games because we can try playing with other people.

Whatever the type, casino games will always be enjoyed and are still popular with their fans. although the time will come, PVP games are here to be a differentiator in the casino industry sector. won't necessarily make us leave our hobbies in terms of sports betting, dice, slots, baccarat, blackjack, or whatever. after all, it's not certain that all gamblers will accept the PVP game.

even casinos that have existed before, may adopt it to stay competitive with something new.
I think we have no debate about this, even as you said, maybe playing bets on Monopoly games can provide a different experience. after that, we can bet on sports betting or other casino games that we usually play.
IMO, it all depends on mood and taste. or maybe if it's a PVP game that offers different characteristics, such as group battles, or individual battles like Mortal Kombat with high graphics. would be even more exciting, but sadly that won't be happening any time soon.

[Silberman]

I enjoy dice, poker and sports betting. So, that will be a mixed up choice and there's no specific choice for me because with all of them, I'm enjoying.

This is always my concerned. PvP games are more prone to cheating and there's no way we can determine if we are up against a real human.

Like in chess games, there are lots of bots designed here and for average users, no way they can win against a bot.

Maybe the reputation of the platform will be the only basis if we are playing with fair competition in a certain PvP match.

This is a legit concern and that's why we don't usually other usual PvP games because of the possibility that the games might be cheated with anyone who has developed some cheats against their opponents. But as for enjoyment, all of them are enjoyable to gamble with but we just have different tastes when it's come to games that we want to play.

And that will always be a problem when it comes to a game of skill, in traditional casino games we know the most important factor is your luck, and as long as the random number generator in which the games are based is a good one then the chances to exploit the game diminish by a substantial level, but when it comes to PvP games in which skill is what matters then it is not difficult for players to find a  way to cheat as whether you win or lose depends on your level of execution, and even software could be made which could do this for you.

[serjent05]

When we play against player, surely there arise a question. Whether it is a real player or not? Maybe the confused mind itself keep your game down. Better is to enjoy the casino games that gives excitement as well as disappointment. My choice is Casino A and I'm surprised to see the voting is high for the Casino B.

This is always my concerned. PvP games are more prone to cheating and there's no way we can determine if we are up against a real human.

Like in chess games, there are lots of bots designed here and for average users, no way they can win against a bot.

Maybe the reputation of the platform will be the only basis if we are playing with fair competition in a certain PvP match.

I agree, with online PVP gambling especially when the competition is just between players, there is a possibility of third-party exploits such as Bot and other cheating software.  So the integrity of PVP is always been in question.

And there is no permanent fix for this concern since once the cheat is patched (fixed) another version of the cheat will appear.  Instead of players get involved in PVP gambling, the PVP will then turn between the gambling owner and the cheat developer.

[KennyR]

When we play against player, surely there arise a question. Whether it is a real player or not? Maybe the confused mind itself keep your game down. Better is to enjoy the casino games that gives excitement as well as disappointment. My choice is Casino A and I'm surprised to see the voting is high for the Casino B.

This is always my concerned. PvP games are more prone to cheating and there's no way we can determine if we are up against a real human.

Like in chess games, there are lots of bots designed here and for average users, no way they can win against a bot.

Maybe the reputation of the platform will be the only basis if we are playing with fair competition in a certain PvP match.

I agree, with online PVP gambling especially when the competition is just between players, there is a possibility of third-party exploits such as Bot and other cheating software.  So the integrity of PVP is always been in question.

And there is no permanent fix for this concern since once the cheat is patched (fixed) another version of the cheat will appear.  Instead of players get involved in PVP gambling, the PVP will then turn between the gambling owner and the cheat developer.

Maybe something like proving the identity that the opponent is a player and not a bot will help in making PvP gambling better. However people always prefer to try the luck than skills. For gamers who have turned gamblers can enjoy these kind of gambling. Maybe something developed over the blockchain could make this happen without flaws.

[ethereumhunter]

If it were a PvP game, people would choose a game they could be interested in and many started playing it after they saw their friends playing together. It is a good idea to try playing PvP games after we have finished playing casino games and it could be a way to relieve stress after playing them. Maybe Monopoly can provide a different experience from slot games because we can try playing with other people.

Whatever the type, casino games will always be enjoyed and are still popular with their fans. although the time will come, PVP games are here to be a differentiator in the casino industry sector. won't necessarily make us leave our hobbies in terms of sports betting, dice, slots, baccarat, blackjack, or whatever. after all, it's not certain that all gamblers will accept the PVP game.

even casinos that have existed before, may adopt it to stay competitive with something new.
I think we have no debate about this, even as you said, maybe playing bets on Monopoly games can provide a different experience. after that, we can bet on sports betting or other casino games that we usually play.
IMO, it all depends on mood and taste. or maybe if it's a PVP game that offers different characteristics, such as group battles, or individual battles like Mortal Kombat with high graphics. would be even more exciting, but sadly that won't be happening any time soon.

Gamblers used to casino games or sports betting will not jump into playing PvP games. They'll probably look around ahead of time to see if they're going to play the PvP game so if they find it uninteresting, they won't play it.

But indeed, casinos need to implement new things outside the habits that that casino or other casinos have done so they can see how their members respond. And also, if the casino owns more games, it can provide a different experience to gamblers and make the casino attract more gamblers to come to their casino.

[Wexnident]

I used to have fun with Casino B styles, I stopped a long time ago though, and just went with sports betting nowadays. They're fun, but they're certainly not for everyone imo. They're just too static imo, too repetitive if played enough times for long-time players, and they're rather scary (imo) for newbie players. Not to say that there aren't any players who enjoy it, otherwise casinos wouldn't have even bothered implementing it in their sites.

[ultrloa]

When we play against player, surely there arise a question. Whether it is a real player or not? Maybe the confused mind itself keep your game down. Better is to enjoy the casino games that gives excitement as well as disappointment. My choice is Casino A and I'm surprised to see the voting is high for the Casino B.

This is always my concerned. PvP games are more prone to cheating and there's no way we can determine if we are up against a real human.

Like in chess games, there are lots of bots designed here and for average users, no way they can win against a bot.

Maybe the reputation of the platform will be the only basis if we are playing with fair competition in a certain PvP match.

I agree, with online PVP gambling especially when the competition is just between players, there is a possibility of third-party exploits such as Bot and other cheating software.  So the integrity of PVP is always been in question.

And there is no permanent fix for this concern since once the cheat is patched (fixed) another version of the cheat will appear.  Instead of players get involved in PVP gambling, the PVP will then turn between the gambling owner and the cheat developer.

However people always prefer to try the luck than skills. For gamers who have turned gamblers can enjoy these kind of gambling. Maybe something developed over the blockchain could make this happen without flaws.

Maybe for now many try their luck by playing on luck base games since this type of games are so rampantly implemented on majority of the casino and there are only few casino which have pvp feature. But if this pvp thing will get enhance or well promoted then provably this will click to the gambler since somehow its more enjoyable if the game you play is somehow you know you are good at.

[Betwrong]

I would prefer B whenever I want a real time challenging game and I also don't want to feel cheated. ~

And for what reason do you feel cheated when playing slot games?

I am a big fan of PvP poker, but I have to admit that you are more likely to be cheated when playing online poker(because of collusion, for instance) than playing online slots. In fact, if you play slots on a reliable gambling platform, the chance of you being cheated is zero. While with PvP poker it is not the case, unfortunately.

[madnessteat]

~snip~

Whatever the type, casino games will always be enjoyed and are still popular with their fans. although the time will come, PVP games are here to be a differentiator in the casino industry sector. won't necessarily make us leave our hobbies in terms of sports betting, dice, slots, baccarat, blackjack, or whatever. after all, it's not certain that all gamblers will accept the PVP game.

even casinos that have existed before, may adopt it to stay competitive with something new.
I think we have no debate about this, even as you said, maybe playing bets on Monopoly games can provide a different experience. after that, we can bet on sports betting or other casino games that we usually play.
IMO, it all depends on mood and taste. or maybe if it's a PVP game that offers different characteristics, such as group battles, or individual battles like Mortal Kombat with high graphics. would be even more exciting, but sadly that won't be happening any time soon.

To be honest, I don't think that such games will be in demand among casino visitors. Anyone who wants to play Mortal Kombat just buys a game console and plays online. For such people, the gameplay itself brings enough pleasure without any reward. Casinos are played for the sake of rewards, which also play an important role in getting pleasure. In my opinion, these are completely different categories of players.

[milewilda]

~snip~

Whatever the type, casino games will always be enjoyed and are still popular with their fans. although the time will come, PVP games are here to be a differentiator in the casino industry sector. won't necessarily make us leave our hobbies in terms of sports betting, dice, slots, baccarat, blackjack, or whatever. after all, it's not certain that all gamblers will accept the PVP game.

even casinos that have existed before, may adopt it to stay competitive with something new.
I think we have no debate about this, even as you said, maybe playing bets on Monopoly games can provide a different experience. after that, we can bet on sports betting or other casino games that we usually play.
IMO, it all depends on mood and taste. or maybe if it's a PVP game that offers different characteristics, such as group battles, or individual battles like Mortal Kombat with high graphics. would be even more exciting, but sadly that won't be happening any time soon.

To be honest, I don't think that such games will be in demand among casino visitors. Anyone who wants to play Mortal Kombat just buys a game console and plays online. For such people, the gameplay itself brings enough pleasure without any reward. Casinos are played for the sake of rewards, which also play an important role in getting pleasure. In my opinion, these are completely different categories of players.

This is true but there are people who do go for some extent on which they are a fan of those video games or something that do talks about pvp and want to experience on playing other or against people which its not
that bad but its true on what you had said that it would be entirely be depending on the demand and the set of players on which these things turns out to be relevant.For a casino who do mind off about fast profits
then for sure they would really be sticking into something that gives out fast execution of games and fast way on earning revenue and this wouldnt be surely be including these type of games
which is time consuming and earns a little benefit to the house if ever.

[Yatsan]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

Casino B is basically what resembles a pvp gambling platform wherein you'd take on other players directly to come up with a win. On the other hand, casino A is more dealing with the 'house'. On my end, I'd prefer a true PVP experience but in sportsbetting I guess 'coz I'm not into esports (most of the pvp are thru online strategical games right?). What I am thinking is dome sort of peer to peer betting on which team would win perhaps on basketball; the concept would be simple and easy, either you'd win or not. Parlays and sub bets of the ending score on each quarter or chances for an OT would also add fun to the experience. This is evident to the gambling site I am currently playing but not all of my preferences mentioned.

[chaser15]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

There's no need to choose what type of gambling games I want for a budget of $10-$100.

Is this how we gambled? In most cases, if we want to gamble, there's something in our mind about what gambling we should be interested in during that time. For example, with a $100 budget, if we feel like gambling in normal casinos, then go for it. If we like PvP games, then head on it. Or if we want to do sports betting, push for it, etc.

As long as we have known the game mechanics and how to gamble at those, we are good to go.

[Quidat]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

There's no need to choose what type of gambling games I want for a budget of $10-$100.

Is this how we gambled? In most cases, if we want to gamble, there's something in our mind about what gambling we should be interested in during that time. For example, with a $100 budget, if we feel like gambling in normal casinos, then go for it. If we like PvP games, then head on it. Or if we want to do sports betting, push for it, etc.

As long as we have known the game mechanics and how to gamble at those, we are good to go.

Plus its our money which it would be normal that we would be doing on things which we do want to do since its our money then it would be our right on where we do want to play.
Its true that this would really vary up on someones emotion because there are moments which we do really like to play some casino games and there are times which we do love to play
on betting on some sports and there are times which we do like to deal with PvP's.This is why it cant really be pointed out because it could really
changed up on a particular time.

[seoincorporation]

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts

I select casino B, because if feel there is a bigger chance to win than casino A. But here the main difference is the winning amounts. In casino A we could hit a crazy multiplier in slots and get an x1000 profit, while casino B only gives us the chance to double up our money on each bet.

So, the answer is about how greedy we are, if we want a big multi with a big chance to lose all A is the right casino, and if we want to build something slow but secure then B is the right casino.

[harizen]

When we play against player, surely there arise a question. Whether it is a real player or not? Maybe the confused mind itself keep your game down. Better is to enjoy the casino games that gives excitement as well as disappointment. My choice is Casino A and I'm surprised to see the voting is high for the Casino B.

This is always my concerned. PvP games are more prone to cheating and there's no way we can determine if we are up against a real human.

Like in chess games, there are lots of bots designed here and for average users, no way they can win against a bot.

Maybe the reputation of the platform will be the only basis if we are playing with fair competition in a certain PvP match.

I agree, with online PVP gambling especially when the competition is just between players, there is a possibility of third-party exploits such as Bot and other cheating software.  So the integrity of PVP is always been in question.

And there is no permanent fix for this concern since once the cheat is patched (fixed) another version of the cheat will appear.  Instead of players get involved in PVP gambling, the PVP will then turn between the gambling owner and the cheat developer.

Even chat software won't do and is not an effective way to know if we are up against humans.

When a real player tries to talk with their opponent to check if that's a real player, expect that not all the time, these players will reply. Yes, there's no permanent fix on this and the site will have a hard time proving to its users that the game is fair and square.

As I mentioned, the only thing that user can be rely on here to check the fairness is, the site reputation.

[Ahli38]

I didn't expect that more people would choose B. I choose A . I don't really like direct interaction. I prefer to place bets in a relaxed state while enjoying a ball game or other sports. But, when I experience a bit of boredom that peaks, I sometimes play PVP Online. Rummy and Poker are the most fun for me. although in the end I often experience defeat and feel annoyed. but it does get a bit more fun. although I rarely play it. But surely you also feel it. when we start playing PVP it's a bit difficult for us to stop. sometimes i forget my time. but in the end it depends on my feeling situation.

[btc78]

Is PvP gaming a thing?

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

If that is the only capital to put in? then I chose gambling 2 because I will at least enjoy and have happy time before losing  

but if given a chance? I would choose both , I love luck base gambling and I also love playing sports game.

What do you mean by the only capital? Maybe you mean to say only game? Because any capital (small or big) it's still up to us if what kind of game we are going to choose and play. There were also lots of casinos invented now so you shouldn't only limit yourself on one to two casino especially if they only have limited amount of games. However no doubt that PVP games are more enjoyable because your skills are being tested here.

Simply reading the OP mate and you'll find the answer about that asking in Capital . OP said that you may have 10-100 capital so that's why i said that Only Capital term.

If you are weak, you can always practice to improve your skill and beat your opponent the next time you face them again. There are people who are versatile and can play different kind of games if they will get bored with the other so it's also a good idea to combine all three (PVP, sports and luck based games) under one roof.

and about the chosen game? I am a pool player and I know I will have bigger chance of winning on that.

[Reatim]

I would love playing in Casino A ,  I love Slot games and I am making money on it( but of course having some losses) so this would be my choice and wanted to enter the gaming .
I will also consider playing PVP in 8pool because I know better in that game, since teen i play that one so maybe hitting it against other players will keep me up.

I didn't expect that more people would choose B. I choose A . I don't really like direct interaction. I prefer to place bets in a relaxed state while enjoying a ball game or other sports. But, when I experience a bit of boredom that peaks, I sometimes play PVP Online. Rummy and Poker are the most fun for me. although in the end I often experience defeat and feel annoyed. but it does get a bit more fun. although I rarely play it. But surely you also feel it. when we start playing PVP it's a bit difficult for us to stop. sometimes i forget my time. but in the end it depends on my feeling situation.

lol why you did not expect? just because you are not a fan of PVP? people nowadays love interactions and excitement , maybe you and very few that chooses  A .

[Plaguedeath]

I didn't expect that more people would choose B. I choose A . I don't really like direct interaction. I prefer to place bets in a relaxed state while enjoying a ball game or other sports. But, when I experience a bit of boredom that peaks, I sometimes play PVP Online. Rummy and Poker are the most fun for me. although in the end I often experience defeat and feel annoyed. but it does get a bit more fun. although I rarely play it. But surely you also feel it. when we start playing PVP it's a bit difficult for us to stop. sometimes i forget my time. but in the end it depends on my feeling situation.

The @OP didn't mention if Casino A's game include sports betting, if sports betting is included on Casino A, I expect it would be 50/50 because most gamblers are prefer to gamble on skill based game rather than lucky based game. When you playing slot, you're only need to keep click spin button and the system will roll from randomized number which you're need to trust the provider if the game isn't rigged.

[len01]

I didn't expect that more people would choose B. I choose A . I don't really like direct interaction. I prefer to place bets in a relaxed state while enjoying a ball game or other sports. But, when I experience a bit of boredom that peaks, I sometimes play PVP Online. Rummy and Poker are the most fun for me. although in the end I often experience defeat and feel annoyed. but it does get a bit more fun. although I rarely play it. But surely you also feel it. when we start playing PVP it's a bit difficult for us to stop. sometimes i forget my time. but in the end it depends on my feeling situation.

maybe you are the typical relaxed gambler or you can be called a gambler according to mood. so you gamble according to your mood where you want to bet, it's much better. because gambling when the mood is good at casino A you have a greater chance of winning. because you gamble with a sense of calm and stability in your own heart.
and betting when the mood is not good has an effect on uncontrolled betting which causes more losses.

sometimes I also feel like you, but very rarely and prefer to go to casino A for now.

[QueenVera]

Well my choice of gaming would basically depend on how much I'm willing to risk but looking at the both options without sentiment I would personally prefer a PvP gaming mode where we would love to gamble and compete with real life humans though strangers because the fairness is great and winning is mostly dependent on how well you could play a d since this games could also be played from the comfort of our homes, then I see no reason to bother over cheating.
But on the other hand if I would love to make much more money at a go, then I will go for the regular casino games a d hope for the best and while hoping, I will be playing the pvp games.
With that been said my answer option is B.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

While A is base on luck, B is base on skill, and I guess that's the kind of game any skillful player will like to gamble over, because when it comes to playing B, a gambler has either 50% chance of either winning or losing, unlike A where the gambler only has like 0.1% chance of winning and 99.9% chance of losing. But not forgetting the fact if you are lucky enough playing A, you can win huge, unlike B that if he/she is skillful enough can still always work home with good sum of money too.
So it depends on individual personality

And where do you see yourself fitting most?

Okay. I see myself fitting most on "A", since I'm a kind who gambles mostly on sport betting, especially soccer to be precise (I.e Championss league or premier league matches), as it gives me the chance to hitting huge winning, that is, when I'm lucky enough to make the correct football match prediction. And it's more fun, since I'm a lover of football and a big fan of Manchester City

[rahmad2nd]

I didn't expect that more people would choose B. I choose A . I don't really like direct interaction. I prefer to place bets in a relaxed state while enjoying a ball game or other sports. But, when I experience a bit of boredom that peaks, I sometimes play PVP Online. Rummy and Poker are the most fun for me. although in the end I often experience defeat and feel annoyed. but it does get a bit more fun. although I rarely play it. But surely you also feel it. when we start playing PVP it's a bit difficult for us to stop. sometimes i forget my time. but in the end it depends on my feeling situation.

To be honest, I did not take part in this voting. because after all, until now we are still actively playing activities at crypto casinos and involving a lot of betting. whether it's dice, slots, backjack, even sportbook. because after all, casino A still provides an attraction for its users.

As for Casino B, which involves PvP games, I am challenged to get involved in it and want to try playing and even betting. in particular, games that are very exciting, challenging, and offer more interesting gameplay. but not for games, Ludo, 8pool, Monopoly, or Rummy like what Op said at casino B. I prefer something new, especially one that provides a challenge for its users. as a result, I will still play casino A. but if casino B offers something different, between one and the other. maybe it could be another option, according to the situation and mood.

[pixie85]

I didn't expect that more people would choose B. I choose A . I don't really like direct interaction. I prefer to place bets in a relaxed state while enjoying a ball game or other sports. But, when I experience a bit of boredom that peaks, I sometimes play PVP Online. Rummy and Poker are the most fun for me. although in the end I often experience defeat and feel annoyed. but it does get a bit more fun. although I rarely play it. But surely you also feel it. when we start playing PVP it's a bit difficult for us to stop. sometimes i forget my time. but in the end it depends on my feeling situation.

B option looks like more fun, that is if it's made to work well and be safe. We're not talking about a game that's in development and you have to choose between a casino with a good working roulette and a pvp game that can suck, because it's not done yet. The way I see my choice is between a working, safe, tested game with no bogs vs another one that's the same just more traditional. In that case I'd choose the pvp option and it looks like this is the winning choice at the moment.

That said, I'm yet to see a good, working game with real pvp matches like people play on world cyber games just with a betting option.

[Dickiy]

As far as I play gambling I only use the casino at point A, I think it's easier to do and more fun to entertain myself, Point B I've never done it and until today I haven't tried it, from a game perspective it might be very interesting because we will always competing with our opponents, but unfortunately I personally can't play and understand the game especially poker I can't play it, maybe I need time to study the game at point B so that betting in my game is more challenging and fun.

[Mahanton]

As far as I play gambling I only use the casino at point A, I think it's easier to do and more fun to entertain myself, Point B I've never done it and until today I haven't tried it, from a game perspective it might be very interesting because we will always competing with our opponents, but unfortunately I personally can't play and understand the game especially poker I can't play it, maybe I need time to study the game at point B so that betting in my game is more challenging and fun.

People would be sticking out on things on where they do know on how to play and on Option B which it all pertains to some card and board games which is something that not all is really that able to know
on how to play and this is why they would be sticking into those casino based games which it doesnt really need up that too much hard instruction for you to play it out, or simply you could really be able to
play if you wanted to.Its true that this would really be depending or basing into someones mood and emotion on a particular time because not all would really be liking to play
luck based and would rather stick into that strategic one.

[Silberman]

As far as I play gambling I only use the casino at point A, I think it's easier to do and more fun to entertain myself, Point B I've never done it and until today I haven't tried it, from a game perspective it might be very interesting because we will always competing with our opponents, but unfortunately I personally can't play and understand the game especially poker I can't play it, maybe I need time to study the game at point B so that betting in my game is more challenging and fun.

There is nothing really wrong with just liking the casino games in which you play against the house, while people gamble because they have the intention of passing a good time, each person has a different definition of what this entails, and if you get your fun by playing games which do not require to outthink your opponent then you can keep gambling in this way, while those that get their fun thinking very deeply about every single move they have to make can keep playing poker and other similar games.

[tabas]

This is a legit concern and that's why we don't usually other usual PvP games because of the possibility that the games might be cheated with anyone who has developed some cheats against their opponents. But as for enjoyment, all of them are enjoyable to gamble with but we just have different tastes when it's come to games that we want to play.

And that will always be a problem when it comes to a game of skill, in traditional casino games we know the most important factor is your luck, and as long as the random number generator in which the games are based is a good one then the chances to exploit the game diminish by a substantial level, but when it comes to PvP games in which skill is what matters then it is not difficult for players to find a  way to cheat as whether you win or lose depends on your level of execution, and even software could be made which could do this for you.

Yeah, those games that are RNG are hardly to be cheated on and if there's a chance then that's just a slight one or in a very rare occasion. But those games that are based on skills, we like to get on it because they're based on how good they are. Although for some instances, if it's a PVP type of betting and it's a game where people can abuse and find a way to earn, they'll for sure going to make a way to abuse the game and cheat on it because the system might be foreseen into that situation. Those are like the bugs that's being uncaught and they take advantage of it.

[letteredhub]

For B, pvp game, i usually engage in it when the other opponent must have made so much boastful statements and I'll just dare him to show my skills especially for football game just to clear his doubt.
One thing I don't fancy about B, pvp is that it sometimes could lead to physical confrontation. If you know what I mean.

[Guzter]

Yeah, those games that are RNG are hardly to be cheated on and if there's a chance then that's just a slight one or in a very rare occasion. But those games that are based on skills, we like to get on it because they're based on how good they are. Although for some instances, if it's a PVP type of betting and it's a game where people can abuse and find a way to earn, they'll for sure going to make a way to abuse the game and cheat on it because the system might be foreseen into that situation. Those are like the bugs that's being uncaught and they take advantage of it.

Cheats are a big concern in the PvP sphere, but I think there will be decent products in the future that will have a decent anti-cheat system, which can be a mix between AIs and humans.

[Oilacris]

Yeah, those games that are RNG are hardly to be cheated on and if there's a chance then that's just a slight one or in a very rare occasion. But those games that are based on skills, we like to get on it because they're based on how good they are. Although for some instances, if it's a PVP type of betting and it's a game where people can abuse and find a way to earn, they'll for sure going to make a way to abuse the game and cheat on it because the system might be foreseen into that situation. Those are like the bugs that's being uncaught and they take advantage of it.

Cheats are a big concern in the PvP sphere, but I think there will be decent products in the future that will have a decent anti-cheat system, which can be a mix between AIs and humans.

One of the hindrance or main blockages on which PvP arent really that something do make out some significant recognition is that these possible cheats could be happen on where
they might be able facing some AI or bot rather than with actual human which it doesnt really give out that kind of confidence into someone.

This is why it ends up on having lesser demand due into those probabilities which arent really that shocking honestly.People do love on sticking up their interest
into those games which are really that instant or something even going against with the house.

[cryptocoupons]

I love both A and B.

[Slow death]

in my case I only place sports bets so these two options are not suited to my reality, it avoided or even I can say that I don't like card games that even if I had a chance to play against other opponents who were real people I would not I would play this because for me I am 100% sure that I would always lose so it doesn't make sense for me to be playing something that I don't have a lot of knowledge that would allow me to win these PvP games are games that rely more on skills than on luck and the people who have these skills in most cases are very experienced people in the game, that kind of people who spend hours every day playing, and it's hard to win in a game against these people. people

[Silberman]

This is a legit concern and that's why we don't usually other usual PvP games because of the possibility that the games might be cheated with anyone who has developed some cheats against their opponents. But as for enjoyment, all of them are enjoyable to gamble with but we just have different tastes when it's come to games that we want to play.

And that will always be a problem when it comes to a game of skill, in traditional casino games we know the most important factor is your luck, and as long as the random number generator in which the games are based is a good one then the chances to exploit the game diminish by a substantial level, but when it comes to PvP games in which skill is what matters then it is not difficult for players to find a  way to cheat as whether you win or lose depends on your level of execution, and even software could be made which could do this for you.

Yeah, those games that are RNG are hardly to be cheated on and if there's a chance then that's just a slight one or in a very rare occasion. But those games that are based on skills, we like to get on it because they're based on how good they are. Although for some instances, if it's a PVP type of betting and it's a game where people can abuse and find a way to earn, they'll for sure going to make a way to abuse the game and cheat on it because the system might be foreseen into that situation. Those are like the bugs that's being uncaught and they take advantage of it.

For example on esports cheating is very common as is not rare to see top level players cheating by using aim bots or wall hacks which allow them to see their rivals behind walls giving them an unfair advantage, and they even do this when there is money at stake cheating legitimate players of their wins, so I can only imagine that if more PVP games become popular at casinos we will see something similar happening, with cheaters doing everything they can to obtain an unfair advantage.

[Betwrong]

As far as I play gambling I only use the casino at point A, I think it's easier to do and more fun to entertain myself, Point B I've never done it and until today I haven't tried it, from a game perspective it might be very interesting because we will always competing with our opponents, but unfortunately I personally can't play and understand the game especially poker I can't play it, maybe I need time to study the game at point B so that betting in my game is more challenging and fun.

Don't worry, if you gamble just for fun, you can forget about PvP games, and you won't miss much.
I'd say, PvP games are for those who want to spend more time than just 30 minutes per week on online gambling. If you are satisfied with your Casino A option, just relax and carry on.

I will tell you one undeniable advantage of Slots over PvP games: with slots you never know what your winnings will be, I mean, they can be huge, while with PvP games it's capped by the prize pool.

[cydrix]

Personal preferences strongly influence a person's enjoyment of gambling activities. Some people may prefer playing slot machines because they have the opportunity to win significant prizes quickly. Others, on the other hand, may find more fun in skill-based activities, such as sports betting, where they may apply their knowledge and experience to try to overcome the odds.

The games available in a casino will appeal to different people depending on their personal interests and preferences. Individuals must strike a balance between pleasurable luck and skill-based games while also being cognizant of the inherent risks associated in all forms of gambling.

[Silberman]

in my case I only place sports bets so these two options are not suited to my reality, it avoided or even I can say that I don't like card games that even if I had a chance to play against other opponents who were real people I would not I would play this because for me I am 100% sure that I would always lose so it doesn't make sense for me to be playing something that I don't have a lot of knowledge that would allow me to win these PvP games are games that rely more on skills than on luck and the people who have these skills in most cases are very experienced people in the game, that kind of people who spend hours every day playing, and it's hard to win in a game against these people. people

It is a good thing you are avoiding PvP games if you are not willing to put into the effort, after all it is not only necessary to play for many hours in order to become good at it, in the case of a game like poker you need to read several books about it and learn to calculate odds on the fly, and those are skills which can be very difficult to acquire, and unless you enjoy the game then it would be a waste of time for anyone to do this.

[Frankolala]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

[Quidat]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

PvP type of games might be that time consuming but if you are really that goes for entertainment then it wont really be that an issue but rather it would be more interesting.
So it does really vary on your mood and preference in the end of the day.So there would be no exact thing about on which one is good because a certain person could
neither be having both for them to deal with basing up on their gambling or leisure needs.Myself could easily made out some switch in between two if i wanted to
as long i do have the money to make bets and im that knowledgeable on things then this one really counts.

[Bushdark]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

Yes option A looks very cool and no stress and many gamblers wi prefer that to many options here because even though the house may have great advantage but gamblers do have similar advantage to win good bets if you know what you are doing. Gambling is more of understanding than just playing your favorite games.

Option B is whatfew gamblers may considered because I usually see this kind of setting in virsual games like soccer and other similar gamblers where two opponents will be playing against themselves looking for a winner.

[DoublerHunter]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

^I respect this opinion which seems I like it too.
If you want to enjoy your gambling as having fun, fighting against the house edge will be really enjoyable than fighting against your opponent which is a human or a PVP game. Based on luck games are stressless, it just depends on your luck. You can take a break anytime you want or you can pause your game. However, experiencing pvp games is also good.

[tabas]

Yeah, those games that are RNG are hardly to be cheated on and if there's a chance then that's just a slight one or in a very rare occasion. But those games that are based on skills, we like to get on it because they're based on how good they are. Although for some instances, if it's a PVP type of betting and it's a game where people can abuse and find a way to earn, they'll for sure going to make a way to abuse the game and cheat on it because the system might be foreseen into that situation. Those are like the bugs that's being uncaught and they take advantage of it.

Cheats are a big concern in the PvP sphere, but I think there will be decent products in the future that will have a decent anti-cheat system, which can be a mix between AIs and humans.

I also believe that there will be certain measures that they'll be able to make to avoid those cheaters or gamblers or players to abuse the system or to detect them easily. There will be moments that it will be fun to make and those updates will make everyone want to do PvP in gambling with almost every possible game that we can play with.

For example on esports cheating is very common as is not rare to see top level players cheating by using aim bots or wall hacks which allow them to see their rivals behind walls giving them an unfair advantage, and they even do this when there is money at stake cheating legitimate players of their wins, so I can only imagine that if more PVP games become popular at casinos we will see something similar happening, with cheaters doing everything they can to obtain an unfair advantage.

That's a fact and even in competitive tournaments, there were those players that have tried to attempt it on an official match. But, as think thought that they'll never get caught, well, they do were caught.

[Shinpako09]

As a gambler myself, this is tough. Option A is what I always play and wanted to but I'm gonna choose B. Simply because I'm not against the house. We all know how hard to beat the house. The last time I played PvP was in Primedice when it is still available. It's just your playing time will be longer as it is slower compared to option A coz I need to wait for someone to accept the challenge.

[traderethereum]

As a gambler myself, this is tough. Option A is what I always play and wanted to but I'm gonna choose B. Simply because I'm not against the house. We all know how hard to beat the house. The last time I played PvP was in Primedice when it is still available. It's just your playing time will be longer as it is slower compared to option A coz I need to wait for someone to accept the challenge.

We don't need to go against the house but try to enjoy gambling time by playing the game we choose.
Whether it's Option A or Option B, both give pleasure to every gambler so they will play longer, especially if they win.
But with so many gamblers congregating at certain casinos, the waiting time for someone to accept the challenge won't be long, especially if we play at a well-known and reputable casino.
But playing gambling in Option A or Option B can make us forget to stop playing because of the fun we get from the casino.

[goldkingcoiner]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

Ok, thought-provoking questions in the gambling subforum today, but I will try my utmost best to give you a clear answer.

As much as I completely adore games where you do not have to play against another human, for example slots, I also very much enjoy playing with other people. Not because I win their money (although the sensation of "schadenfreude" is exciting, when you win their hard earned money), but because at some point, playing alone does start to become a bit lonely.

We are social animals, after all. My vote is for people vs people.

[pawanjain]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?
I mean, I've seen couple of threads here about some decent PvP games, but I'm not sure if people really do prefer this sort of gaming, specially in terms of the fun and the ROI.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

If I were in this situation then I would choose option B because I like competing with other players.
It doesn't really matter much if you are playing with a stranger. Although it would be more fun while playing with friends but we do get fun when we compete against a real person.
Winning against a real person gives a satisfaction which we don't get from competing against a casino.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

I will first analyze myself as a gambler and check the area am best at in gambling, if my preferred choice goes with gambling against an opponent then i will go for option B while if i will only prefer betting against the system then i go for option A, nevertheless this also determines the capability of my financial stand if i can be able to bet on a raw or have the two in combination because it will definitely requires several attempts for one to have the chances of winning at least one if chosen the option B.

[Peanutswar]

 The term PvP is a Person versus Person upon playing tabletop games still you are competing with the other players  some of the people must prefer this because they know the excitement of beating other people with their skills, and some of them just want to flex this knowledge and talent in playing gambling to gain reputation, well different purpose why they want to choose this, in playing solo only for me does not make too much because the excitement is in the every roll and multiplier you hit, its a Game vs person you want to beat the current system and win a huge amount.

[FatFork]

I'm more of a old school kind of person. I prefer classic gambling (if online casinos can even be called classic gambling), although I'm familiar with PvP gambling, where individuals compete against each other in games of skill or chance, rather than against a casino or house. However, I do see the appeal of PvP gambling as well. The idea of going head to head with other individuals, rather than against the house, adds a whole new level of challenge and excitement. It's great to see the growth of online card games and esports tournaments, which provide a platform for PvP gambling. In the end, it's all about personal preference. Some people love the classic casino experience, while others prefer the challenge of PvP gambling.

[Casdinyard]

I voted for casino B foremost because the concept works so well on paper. Most of the games we have today are so boring and tedious I might as well watch paint dry and bet on whether a drop of it will land on my scuffed shoes or not. Then again, I have yet to see a casino actually executing a PVP gambling website. Mostly because it's expensive to make one and even more expensive to maintain it. So my disappointment is immeasurable. Hoping that one day a casino steps up and makes one though. Pretty sure it'll blow up.

[rahmad2nd]

Option A is what I love. No stress,gamble on you own and not like a competition thing that you need much experience and calculations that might end up in vain,when the opponent side wins.

Gambling is all about luck,so I will chill and let my luck do the winning than worry myself. A skilled based game PVP is time consuming and you must have the knowledge of the game unlike option A,that is opened to everyone.

Ideally, option A will always be favored by connoisseurs and fans who prefer the casino type of games. however, those who like new types of challenges such as PvP games will no exception also play the type of game option A. at least, we are presented with a variety of game types that also have many differences.

Which in the end, all depends on one's choice, taste, and expertise. for me, games like PvP might offer something new and we can get involved in it. it could be just to find a new atmosphere, or just to get experience depending on the games they offer. however, the type of game option A will always have a fanatical connoisseur. especially those people who prefer simple games just to relax and relieve stress. one example, as you say.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Ok, thought-provoking questions in the gambling subforum today, but I will try my utmost best to give you a clear answer.

As much as I completely adore games where you do not have to play against another human, for example slots, I also very much enjoy playing with other people. Not because I win their money (although the sensation of "schadenfreude" is exciting, when you win their hard earned money), but because at some point, playing alone does start to become a bit lonely.

We are social animals, after all. My vote is for people vs people.

But literally, there is no game that you are not going to win other people's hard earned money, because be it slot, dice, sportbetting or any other game that wont involves a winner working away with other people's money risk at a certain price, which is why it's called "gambling" because they willingly gave the money out at a risk. Secondly, p2p will be more fun due to the fact that it gives users the privilege to gamble between themselves

[fullhdpixel]

I will first analyze myself as a gambler and check the area am best at in gambling, if my preferred choice goes with gambling against an opponent then i will go for option B while if i will only prefer betting against the system then i go for option A, nevertheless this also determines the capability of my financial stand if i can be able to bet on a raw or have the two in combination because it will definitely requires several attempts for one to have the chances of winning at least one if chosen the option B.

The option B is about PvP gambling. I think this type of gambling is more winnable if one practices a lot and already build sufficient experience but it does not mean that you will engage on the real thing first and use some cash but there might be a similar game simulation for one to sharpen their skills.

It was the option A or gambling against the house is a kind of gambling which are hard to win because the house always has the advantage. They already adjusted their system this way and there is no way for the users to change it unless if they are a part of the gambling team and they will do an inside job. Choosing both types of gambling can be fun though and more challenging.

[Oilacris]

Ok, thought-provoking questions in the gambling subforum today, but I will try my utmost best to give you a clear answer.

As much as I completely adore games where you do not have to play against another human, for example slots, I also very much enjoy playing with other people. Not because I win their money (although the sensation of "schadenfreude" is exciting, when you win their hard earned money), but because at some point, playing alone does start to become a bit lonely.

We are social animals, after all. My vote is for people vs people.

But literally, there is no game that you are not going to win other people's hard earned money, because be it slot, dice, sportbetting or any other game that wont involves a winner working away with other people's money risk at a certain price, which is why it's called "gambling" because they willingly gave the money out at a risk. Secondly, p2p will be more fun due to the fact that it gives users the privilege to gamble between themselves

So it do always falls down on someones interest and preference because if we do look those casino games to be interesting because of fast results and easy access and outcome then compared into those
pvp type which it does really take up some time but this is somehow more entertaining but we know that each person does have their own interest when it comes to gambling approach.
PvP games or Casino games, it doesnt matter because you are the ones who do have the full rights since its your money and it would be also basing up on your mood whether you do
like to play casino games or would like to be playing with other players when it comes to those strategic games.

[chaser15]

The option B is about PvP gambling. I think this type of gambling is more winnable if one practices a lot and already build sufficient experience but it does not mean that you will engage on the real thing first and use some cash but there might be a similar game simulation for one to sharpen their skills.

It was the option A or gambling against the house is a kind of gambling which are hard to win because the house always has the advantage. They already adjusted their system this way and there is no way for the users to change it unless if they are a part of the gambling team and they will do an inside job. Choosing both types of gambling can be fun though and more challenging.

I doubt Option B is more winnable like what you are saying. Since that was skill-based, expect that more skilled players will engage in that gambling and you will mostly encounter them as you progress. Only a few players will choose that kind of gambling therefore, only those players that know the game will play that game.

You can't expect to always face a newbie on that type of game. They are being mostly skilled and even highly professional.

Both gambling types are somehow hard to win. It's just that once we already gaining profits playing at those, try to take a break and don't get carried away.