QUESTION: For Gambling Enthusiasts ❗❗

[Fivestar4everMVP]

This questions and comparison between pvp and casino games might not be fair, and this is because -
Pvp games requires a good level of skill to be able to win, while casino games on the other hand is purely luck based, those who lack the skill to challenge or play against other gamblers will definitely settle for casino games, while those who have the skill winning the game requires will choose to settle with pvp games..

But if I was asked to make a choice as to which I think is more fun to play, I would prefer pvp games over casino games, I think nothing is more fun in gambling than challenging other players.

[Baofeng]

I'm not only PvP to be honest, so I guess the clear answer for most of us here are A, we prefer slot games and other casino games. I don't have nothing against those who are into PvP, playing against stranger and testing their skills with others. But for some, it might take some time, I mean for sure there is a learning curve for those PvP games that you mentioned and along the way you may have lost huge money before you can 'master' some of the games and trick. As compare to casino games that is very easy, although base on luck and others are willing to take that risk with their money in slot games and bacarrat.

[Bushdark]

PVP gaming is really a thing but only for those who are skilled enough in that particular and specific game.

Not all do have those skills that's why others preferred just playing the usual casino games and find their luck. PVP type of gaming is also for experienced ones that a pre-knowledge about the game is really necessary before anyone wants to compete with others with stake money.

There are also games that might be prone to some cheats or any sort of game bot e.g chess, checkers, pool, billiards etc. and we don't know if we are against a real human or a bot.

PvP type of game is very competitive and it can be very annoying losing consistently because your opponent is a guru in the making and that alone can make you feel bad making adjustments. There are so persons thatmight find it very interesting because they are playing with a real human not against computer that could limit the chances of players winning at random.

I would prefer the pvp if I am playing with little fund because I wouldn't want to make the mistake of taking the risk of losing money easily without knowing how good and experienced the person I am playing with good be.

[uneng]

When playing against the house you have the assurance to be under provably fair system, at least in crypto casinos, so theoretically you can't be cheated. All outcomes must be fair and legit.

On the other hand, when you play on PvP mode, there are serious chances the other player uses bots and macros to have a dishonest advantage over you along the match, as we have already seen in Chess and FPS games, for example.

if there was a method to make sure PvP games were provably fair as well, I would go for it, without any doubts. But since there isn't, every gambling categories have the same winning potential for me. Casino's games have the house edge, which benefits the house on long term and PvP games have the issue I mentioned above, which benefits users making use of such resources on long term.

[famososMuertos]

There is something subjective in how you approach the subject, if you allow me to enter your idea.

The bet on the desire to do it is individual, either because you are a recreational player or because you want to obtain a latent return in the long term, that is, professional.

The above positions these two groups of individuals in any type of game that requires a bet (options A,B), whether in traditional casino games or PvP type.  In fact we will have players who manifest themselves in both.

My option: C...
No matter where you put the bet, enjoying it is the intangible gain that we should never lose, even when the ROI is not there to launch rockets.

[Guzter]

If B if your answer then I doubt you have long to wait. There's already games like axie/roy that do that sort of thing but not with good graphics/strategy yet imo as well as live table games (which I assume function like actual casinos and I was under the impression they have these for blackjack and poker).

I'd prefer a PvP that was designed and played like an MMORPG but I guess we're a while away from that being a thing (wagers could be placed on leagues of those imo too to make it more appealing to gambling).

I feel like it's going to be the future one day.

Imagine a game like diablo that uses a cryptocurrency instead of gold. You drop crypto in game, use it as a currency in their store, can spend it on exchanges outside of the game, hold it in a wallet and wager it in casinos. Then you can also bet it against other players in a pvp within the game and win more.

As far as I know PvP gambling is not a thing yet, not even in the simplest way like 2 players playing chess or something. The only way to do PvP in a casino is to play poker.

I think because it has a very small niche, as most of gamers are medium skill players.

[Guzter]

PvP gambling would be awesome. Many years ago there was a platform that let you gamble against other players in an online mini putt putt game. It was fun. This was pre-crypto. The problem is that people always find a way to cheat or they master certain things so it isn’t as fair as it should be. One day gambling will find its way into popular video game systems though. When you can bet real money against players on your Xbox playing popular games, that will be awesome.

I think as long as it involves skills people will try cheating.

[ryzaadit]

I will share thoughts about "PVP"

One thing about these, the player who is playing not gonna feeling getting cheated because is Player vs Player. However, people are more often playing against the house with some reason.

The reason, lack of player for "PVP" game except for Poker. But people who are not liked poker, will always more prefer to play against the house because looking a player is really hard and wasting some time user.
---
My thread about "PVP" Games: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5256076.msg54632401#msg54632401

But most of the casino who created the game, is already gone due the lack of player or user.

[Gozie51]

I think I prefer the option of A because of the nature of it. I like to do my own analysis of a game by myself and know my winning chances. PvP involves a great personal skill and strategy for you to be able to compete with an opponent directly. It kind of more technical for you to get to win your opponent, though it looks more of a game but to compete directly against someone creates a nostalgic feeling.

[lionheart78]

Gonna pick A since slots is the reason why I am into gambling.  I am not confident dealing with PVP thing especially when it becomes a battle of skill.  Besides, slot give better reward in ratio to the bet if we get lucky since most slots give 5k to 15k times the base bet as maximum wins.  PVP sounds cool but when it comes to the amount to win, there nothing beats a casino games.

[Finestream]

I would choose A. I really like playing alone and grinding it out solo, and I find myself consciously trying hard to be better against other people drains too much energy than I really like. But if I'm in the mood to go and be a try-hard, perhaps going to a PvP casino is the way to go. It's really fun to go against someone that has better skills than you because you'll be learning a lot in how they play and how they respond to pressure which you can definitely use the next time you'll be playing the same game.

Same with mine I’ll go for A. Although they are luck based games but they can be more challenging especially if you are fighting too with a player that has good skills as you. Either you can beat him, or you’ll be beaten but at least you also learned from him. And seeing these games have better rewards, then I would always want my luck here too.

[madnessteat]

In my opinion, the choice of gambling depends on the mood. The same gambling quickly gets boring.

For example, in the last gambling session I played poker. I am not sure that there were no bots among the players, but there were real people for sure.

Before last gambling session I dedicated to slots, which as well as many other gamblers are addicted to at a time when my country had casinos in every neighborhood.  

[Oilacris]

1. Casino A - is on what we are commonly seeing today and whats been commonly offered.Why? these are games that would be having house edge and this is something which
gambling company owners would really much prefer considering that fastness of games been done and which means that revenue would really be also that fast.

2. Casino B- there are some sites who do offer but eventually not really getting that much attention. Not because house doesnt really like to offer up these games
but rather people do only stick into those instantaneous type of games which they could see the results in a blink of an eye which means
that it does have lesser demands for these pvp type.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

While A is base on luck, B is base on skill, and I guess that's the kind of game any skillful player will like to gamble over, because when it comes to playing B, a gambler has either 50% chance of either winning or losing, unlike A where the gambler only has like 0.1% chance of winning and 99.9% chance of losing. But not forgetting the fact if you are lucky enough playing A, you can win huge, unlike B that if he/she is skillful enough can still always work home with good sum of money too.
So it depends on individual personality

[crzy]

Can you add another option?
Because the problem of PvP is finding your opponent which can be a problem to site if they focus on that, so better to have a PvP game option and the usual casino games to make the site more fun to play and to gamble. Some gamblers are not a gamer they didn’t want to compete on their own, they just want to place a bet and wait for the result.

[o48o]

-cut-
If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

Occasionally i am playing pvp games like poker. But turns out i am not build for it and get bored easily. So i would have to play several tables at once. But when i do play over 3 tables i get too distracted and it's harder to take breaks. I don't know what game you mean by race cars but monopoly should be fun for real money.

However in reality i stick to gambling in sports and slots so i would pick A. I've been thinking i should try out table card games against the house too but i am not so excited about the fact theres no change hitting jackpot.

[dunfida]

Can you add another option?
Because the problem of PvP is finding your opponent which can be a problem to site if they focus on that, so better to have a PvP game option and the usual casino games to make the site more fun to play and to gamble. Some gamblers are not a gamer they didn’t want to compete on their own, they just want to place a bet and wait for the result.

Also not all does have the patience on dealing up with games which it is really giving out that kind of long result and would rather they would really be liking on having those instant results which could be only found on dice,roulettes and crash games and not into those typical pvp types like card games and other similar stuffs.This is why it do always falls down on someomes interest and preference and this is where the market
would really be basing on where is really the demand.If they do saw that there's something lacking then for sure they would really be putting more focus on that one.
Every section does have its own market where businesses whether would be trying to cope up or not.

[goinmerry]

Is PvP gaming a thing?
Is it fun to compete against strangers for money? Does it provide the same level of comfort and convenience as casino games?

PVP gaming or PVP type of gambling is just a usual gambling type you encounter in the gambling world.

Is it fun? Obviously, the answer will vary for a person that "likes" it or "dislike" it. We all have our own preferences in the first place.

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.

With that amount, I don't want to bother with skill-based games at those mentioned games where I'm not sure if all users in the room are legit players.

I will go all-in in playing slots and hope that luck will come to my side. No hassle, just tap that spin button.

[Guzter]

This questions and comparison between pvp and casino games might not be fair, and this is because -
Pvp games requires a good level of skill to be able to win, while casino games on the other hand is purely luck based, those who lack the skill to challenge or play against other gamblers will definitely settle for casino games, while those who have the skill winning the game requires will choose to settle with pvp games..

But if I was asked to make a choice as to which I think is more fun to play, I would prefer pvp games over casino games, I think nothing is more fun in gambling than challenging other players.

So, each has their own community.

[Guzter]

If you are familiar with the PvP gambling topic, which of the following would you pick if you had $10–$100 and felt like gambling?

1. Casino A:
Normal casino where players play Slot games, BlackJack, Rollet, baccarat, Crazy, and the rest of casino games with the chance of winning large chunk of money.

2. Casino B:
PvP casino where players compete against each others in games such as Poker, Rummy, Ludo, 8Pool, Monopoly, Race Cars, Flipcoin, etc..., with the prize being your opponents buy-in amounts.


If you don't want to express your thoughts, simply answer with A or B.

While A is base on luck, B is base on skill, and I guess that's the kind of game any skillful player will like to gamble over, because when it comes to playing B, a gambler has either 50% chance of either winning or losing, unlike A where the gambler only has like 0.1% chance of winning and 99.9% chance of losing. But not forgetting the fact if you are lucky enough playing A, you can win huge, unlike B that if he/she is skillful enough can still always work home with good sum of money too.
So it depends on individual personality

And where do you see yourself fitting most?