RoyalStarsCasino.com | Crypto Fastest Growing Casino | Best No Wagering of 375%

[DiMarxist]

The website is malfunctioning in the login process. The captcha is disturbing that one can't login. Within 1 second your season has expired when I am still solving the captcha. Therefore you have to remove the captcha for smooth login. But registration was successful. suzanne5223 should inform the technical support team.

Were you playing at this casino before ? If yes, for how long ?
As i see this casino ANN thread wasn't been active for an year and today you have complained about it. It will be interesting to know if this casino is operational in all that time and if those who were playing there, could tell this exactly.

So the casino should not accept new players because I was not an old players. Well I was registering because the campaign application requirements needed the RoyalStarsCasino.com username. And that was the reason so I don't know that it is only the old users can made a complain. Yes the ANN thread was inactive but as they have launched their campaign again then the thread would be active again because people would made comments.
And to answer you. No, I have not participated in the casino before and as I said it was because of the campaign requirements. But if I was successfully registered, probably I would have tested it.

[virasog]

I guess the x35 wagering requirement is fine, at least it is better than x40 or x50, but these winning limitations are ridiculous. We can play with a "Maximum betting limit of 4€ (or an amount equivalent in other currencies) per game round/spin", but if we get lucky and hit something really nice we will get just part of it.

The deposit bonus never get my attention as I know I will not be able to meet the wagering requirements.
Even with x35 wagering requirement, it is hard to complete this requirement successfully and withdraw the bonus. I wonder how many people are ever able to benefit from the deposit bonus.

Yes the ANN thread was inactive but as they have launched their campaign again then the thread would be active again because people would made comments.
And to answer you. No, I have not participated in the casino before and as I said it was because of the campaign requirements. But if I was successfully registered, probably I would have tested it.

I was wondering why this thread was bumped recently and the reason as you told is that RoyalStarsCasino have started their campaign. Can I have the link to that campaign because for some reason I was not able to find it or at least it wasn't seen on the first page of the Services section.

[Kavelj22]

I just received this email informing me that ownership of the casino has been transferred to a new company under a new license from Anjouan: marketing@royalstarscasino.com

"We are writing to inform you of an important change regarding the operation of Royalstars Casino.
Effective 18 May 2026, Modern World Entertainment B.V.., a company incorporated under the laws of Curaçao, with registration number 163861, will no longer operate Royal Stars Casino.
Instead, the platform will be managed by Wild Blackfin Limited SRL, with registration number 3-102-944496 and licensed by the Anjouan Licensing Services Inc. to offer games of chance under license number ALSI-202601043-FI2, which will take over full operational control, including the management of player accounts and services."

This means that user data now exists in two copies, one with each company. Of course, they will claim that the data was simply transferred and that the first company did not retain a copy.

[logfiles]

I just received this email informing me that ownership of the casino has been transferred to a new company under a new license from Anjouan: marketing@royalstarscasino.com

"We are writing to inform you of an important change regarding the operation of Royalstars Casino.
Effective 18 May 2026, Modern World Entertainment B.V.., a company incorporated under the laws of Curaçao, with registration number 163861, will no longer operate Royal Stars Casino.
Instead, the platform will be managed by Wild Blackfin Limited SRL, with registration number 3-102-944496 and licensed by the Anjouan Licensing Services Inc. to offer games of chance under license number ALSI-202601043-FI2, which will take over full operational control, including the management of player accounts and services."

This means that user data now exists in two copies, one with each company. Of course, they will claim that the data was simply transferred and that the first company did not retain a copy.

I guess one of the reasons I was never able to sign up with them was because my country is one of those that is blocked by them. I am not sure if they grew in popularity after those couple of years but a quick look through the latest winners and top winners shows that the activity isn't that much in the casino.

Also regarding the user data being shared. That is the risk users make when signing up to such platforms by agreeing to the terms of service and privacy policy, the service does whatever the feel like with the user data,

[Kavelj22]

Also regarding the user data being shared. That is the risk users make when signing up to such platforms by agreeing to the terms of service and privacy policy, the service does whatever the feel like with the user data,

But this story raises some more serious questions. When I sign up in a casino or in any other service, this should mean that I trust this company to hold my data, and the part issuing the license.
Does it stipulate in the TOS that private data of the registered users can be transferred to the new owner if the original owner voluntarily changes ownership? (Not confiscation by authorities). What if I, as a user, do not want to share my data with the new company for any reason? Do I have the right for objection by any mean?

[logfiles]

But this story raises some more serious questions. When I sign up in a casino or in any other service, this should mean that I trust this company to hold my data, and the part issuing the license.
Does it stipulate in the TOS that private data of the registered users can be transferred to the new owner if the original owner voluntarily changes ownership? (Not confiscation by authorities). What if I, as a user, do not want to share my data with the new company for any reason? Do I have the right for objection by any mean?

All that is covered in the privacy policy which is why I say it's very important to read and understand it before you sign up. Once you share your information with any of these platforms. Consider it already unsafe even when they promise that they will safely protect your data

Here are bits of the privacy policy

We may disclose your personal information to third parties:

    In the event that we sell or buy any business or assets, in which case we may disclose your personal data to the prospective seller or buyer of such business or assets.
    If Royal Stars Casino or substantially all of its assets are acquired by a third party, in which case personal data held by it about its customers will be one of the transferred assets.

Here are your rights. You can actually start by closing/deleting your account with the platform.

Your rights over your Personal Data

We will assist you if you choose to exercise any of your rights over your Personal Data, including:

• Withdrawing your previously granted consent; however, this will not invalidate any previously consented processing
• Lodging a complaint with any relevant Data Protection Authority
• Access to your Personal Data that we hold or process
• Correction of any Personal Data that is incorrect or out of date
• Erasure of any Personal Data that we process
• Restrict the processing of your Personal Data in certain circumstances
• Asking us to provide you or another company you nominate with certain aspects of your Personal Data, often referred to as ‘the right to portability’
• The ability to object to any processing data where we are doing it for our legitimate interests
• The ability to contest a decision made entirely by automated processing, to express your point of view and to request that a human review the decision

[MusaMohamed]

All that is covered in the privacy policy which is why I say it's very important to read and understand it before you sign up. Once you share your information with any of these platforms. Consider it already unsafe even when they promise that they will safely protect your data

On any online platforms, if they have KYC and you submitted your identity documents for KYC verification, you lost your documents immediately at that time. No matter your KYC verification will be succeeded or failed, your documents lost to the company, the third party company for KYC verificaiton, and the Internet.

So losing privacy begins with your action, and whatever terms are written in ToS are not too important, whatever promise a company gives you is not important too. Even if they try to secure your documents, protect your privacy, no guarantee that they won't have any hack, data breach or have to face with command and pressure from government in the future. Most companies can not fight back against government commands and users have many disadvantages if they already did KYC.

[Agbe]

This means that user data now exists in two copies, one with each company. Of course, they will claim that the data was simply transferred and that the first company did not retain a copy.

By the right the old owners of rue casino should not have a copy of the users' information since they have sold the company to a new company, it is the new company should have control on the users' data. The former owners have nothing to do with your information. Or is it for backup purpose?

[MuffinMaster]

This means that user data now exists in two copies, one with each company. Of course, they will claim that the data was simply transferred and that the first company did not retain a copy.

By the right the old owners of rue casino should not have a copy of the users' information since they have sold the company to a new company, it is the new company should have control on the users' data. The former owners have nothing to do with your information. Or is it for backup purpose?

The point is that the privacy policy includes a provision we agree to when registering, stating that our data can be sold along with the company. It's just that most people don't realize this.

As for the old owners, AML act imposes an obligation on gambling services to keep KYC data and transaction history for up to 5 years (depending on the licensing jurisdiction).

[Kavelj22]

This means that user data now exists in two copies, one with each company. Of course, they will claim that the data was simply transferred and that the first company did not retain a copy.

By the right the old owners of rue casino should not have a copy of the users' information since they have sold the company to a new company, it is the new company should have control on the users' data. The former owners have nothing to do with your information. Or is it for backup purpose?

The point is that the privacy policy includes a provision we agree to when registering, stating that our data can be sold along with the company. It's just that most people don't realize this.

As for the old owners, AML act imposes an obligation on gambling services to keep KYC data and transaction history for up to 5 years (depending on the licensing jurisdiction).

I don't believe they will get rid off that data base after 5 years or after tens of years. It is their hidden fortune that can be exploited in different methods.

Thank you for the detailed clarification. Indeed I wasn't aware about all of this and wasn't expecting it to be stipulated in the TOS. Those companies are clever enough to not forget any detail to be exploited as a loophole at any occasion. Those clauses eliminate any chance of objection by the user. The company can sell those data to the devil and nobody can say a word.

[MuffinMaster]

...
The point is that the privacy policy includes a provision we agree to when registering, stating that our data can be sold along with the company. It's just that most people don't realize this.

As for the old owners, AML act imposes an obligation on gambling services to keep KYC data and transaction history for up to 5 years (depending on the licensing jurisdiction).

I don't believe they will get rid off that data base after 5 years or after tens of years. It is their hidden fortune that can be exploited in different methods.

Thank you for the detailed clarification. Indeed I wasn't aware about all of this and wasn't expecting it to be stipulated in the TOS. Those companies are clever enough to not forget any detail to be exploited as a loophole at any occasion. Those clauses eliminate any chance of objection by the user. The company can sell those data to the devil and nobody can say a word.

The fact that they have to keep the database for at least five years after the company is sold is a legal requirement. I honestly have no idea if they can keep it longer or if they have to destroy it. Maybe someone else will know?

But as you said, it's probably impossible to physically control to who else (besides the new company owner) they might sell the database. It's possible that in the future, it will be secured somehow with smart contracts. Someone should think about it, because it still is wild west.

[Kavelj22]

...
The point is that the privacy policy includes a provision we agree to when registering, stating that our data can be sold along with the company. It's just that most people don't realize this.

As for the old owners, AML act imposes an obligation on gambling services to keep KYC data and transaction history for up to 5 years (depending on the licensing jurisdiction).

I don't believe they will get rid off that data base after 5 years or after tens of years. It is their hidden fortune that can be exploited in different methods.

Thank you for the detailed clarification. Indeed I wasn't aware about all of this and wasn't expecting it to be stipulated in the TOS. Those companies are clever enough to not forget any detail to be exploited as a loophole at any occasion. Those clauses eliminate any chance of objection by the user. The company can sell those data to the devil and nobody can say a word.

The fact that they have to keep the database for at least five years after the company is sold is a legal requirement. I honestly have no idea if they can keep it longer or if they have to destroy it. Maybe someone else will know?

But as you said, it's probably impossible to physically control to who else (besides the new company owner) they might sell the database. It's possible that in the future, it will be secured somehow with smart contracts. Someone should think about it, because it still is wild west.

I think of another point which is about changing the activity license with another issuer body. Let's say I trust casinos having Anjouan license and do not trust Curacao. Why should I accept the change without the minimum right to objection or to just leave the platform since those changes usually done behind the scenes.

I see it as an important topic to discuss many points regarding change ownership and change license. I think to start a discussion thread in the Gambling Discussion board.