Is the government can really make a way to end poverty or it depends on us?

[SmartCharpa]

Many people are too dependent and blame the government when poverty occurs, most countries have made maximum efforts to overcome poverty, for example are free education for up to 15 years, scholarships to other countries, training to the provision of business capital, of course not everyone can succeed to overcome poverty.

I haven't noticed anything wrong with governments when we blame them for the state of the economy in the nation. It is our responsibility to hold them accountable for it, and it is also their responsibility to take care of the country. While I agree that not everyone will be able to escape poverty, if most governments are unable to provide jobs for educated youth, how do you suppose that sort of nation won't be holding them accountable? It's okay for citizens to criticize the government, but we shouldn't depend on them. Having a second source of income is the best plan of getting out of poverty.

[1715629833]

1715629833

[1715629833]

1715629833

[Ever-young]

I believe the both the government and it's citizen have their own role to play in other to reduce poverty in their country.
The government will first of all make provision for good infrastructure, which includes medical facilities, educational center, good road and all of that. When at least this above is being made available by the government, the country be a center of attraction for investor and immigrants. If the citizens are to start something on their own like a private business and all of that, there will be people around to patronize their small business which will help it grow to the next level, and when their is an increase in demand then entrepreneurs can make room for employment which will help uplift few people from unemployment and at thesame time it has pull few people from poverty.

[Wend]

Many people are too dependent and blame the government when poverty occurs, most countries have made maximum efforts to overcome poverty, for example are free education for up to 15 years, scholarships to other countries, training to the provision of business capital, of course not everyone can succeed to overcome poverty.

I haven't noticed anything wrong with governments when we blame them for the state of the economy in the nation. It is our responsibility to hold them accountable for it, and it is also their responsibility to take care of the country. While I agree that not everyone will be able to escape poverty, if most governments are unable to provide jobs for educated youth, how do you suppose that sort of nation won't be holding them accountable? It's okay for citizens to criticize the government, but we shouldn't depend on them. Having a second source of income is the best plan of getting out of poverty.

The government plays an important role in poverty alleviation, and if a country has a high poverty rate, it is the government's fault. But we shouldn't blame them entirely either, if you're poor because you're lazy, you can't blame the government for not helping you. The government will provide jobs and opportunities, but you need to grab it fast, you can't expect them to come and teach you how to make money in detail.

[Uruhara]

I believe the both the government and it's citizen have their own role to play in other to reduce poverty in their country.
The government will first of all make provision for good infrastructure, which includes medical facilities, educational center, good road and all of that. When at least this above is being made available by the government, the country be a center of attraction for investor and immigrants. If the citizens are to start something on their own like a private business and all of that, there will be people around to patronize their small business which will help it grow to the next level, and when their is an increase in demand then entrepreneurs can make room for employment which will help uplift few people from unemployment and at thesame time it has pull few people from poverty.

Government and citizens do have their respective roles in this matter. And it is true that if the Government provides good facilities for its citizens then this can also encourage its citizens to escape poverty. For example, if a country focuses on advancing the natural tourism sector in its country. then residents around the tourism area will indeed be helped economically. because residents can open businesses in the tourism sector. and even opening a shop near the tourism sector can give shop owners multiple advantages. because in tourism areas we can already see that the price of necessities sold in shops is always much more expensive than in places far from tourist spots.

[lalabotax]

I'm not really sure if the country can end poverty in the country, if it can, there should be no poverty now.
Well, maybe in certain countries, this is possible, countries that just have a smaller population than they should, countries that are already very developed, and have good resources.
However, for countries that are still developing or lacking, this will be very difficult and may not be possible. what they can do is help their people live better and more decently, by providing sufficient employment opportunities with appropriate salaries. but the reality is that up to now, not everything can be fulfilled and it is the people themselves who have to work alone and support themselves to survive. Moreover, if there are many corruptors in that country, then this will be impossible to do.

[Franctoshi]

No government in the world can completely eradicate poverty from the system but it can be reduced to the barest minimum.  Poverty eradication is not just an issue only to be handled by the government alone, rather it is a general issue that requires collective efforts or all hands on deck to achieve such a goal, it needs individual contribution, Non-governmental organizations NGOs and with the help of the government itself it will become easier to achieve.

[Quidat]

No government in the world can completely eradicate poverty from the system but it can be reduced to the barest minimum.  Poverty eradication is not just an issue only to be handled by the government alone, rather it is a general issue that requires collective efforts or all hands on deck to achieve such a goal, it needs individual contribution, Non-governmental organizations NGOs and with the help of the government itself it will become easier to achieve.

Citizens should realize this on which poverty is a global problem on which it isnt something that could be solved out easily.Therefore, it would really be just that wise that you should really be that sensible
on taking your own step on making yourself way more progressive rather than on relying yourself on what the government do really provide on because in overall situation that we are facing specially that inflation then it is something that makes our life even more struggling and difficult. This is why it would really be wise that you should really be that mindful about finding other income source aside from your day job. Invest if possible and make business to make your living way more better since you are generating other source of income. Even myself dont mind about governments actions or opportunity that they are giving but rather going solo on what are possible options that i could take.

[Uruhara]

No government in the world can completely eradicate poverty from the system but it can be reduced to the barest minimum.  Poverty eradication is not just an issue only to be handled by the government alone, rather it is a general issue that requires collective efforts or all hands on deck to achieve such a goal, it needs individual contribution, Non-governmental organizations NGOs and with the help of the government itself it will become easier to achieve.

Well that's right. We are individually responsible for our own lives. But in general then all have their respective roles. And the government is not a determinant that can make people rich. But if the government can manage the country's natural resources and distribute the profits to all public facilities such as free schools, free health care and various other conveniences for its citizens. Even like in Arab countries where it is said that even school children there are given pocket money from the government. So, if the government is like that and is also honest with the people, then I think the people will be helped to more easily improve their standard of living. As in Arab countries that are fertile with petroleum. we see that there are many rich people there. because there the government really pays attention to the interests of its people. and the level of corruption is not high in that country.

because usually the level of corruption in a country is very high, it can be seen from the declining welfare of its people.

[loopes]

In my country i observed so many people doing rally and blame the government why the basic needs price rise and the salary is still very low and not enough for daily expenses, is this the effect of the Ukraine and russia war that makes the gas or crude oil so high at price and they pass the gas expenses to the product and it ends to very high price of the basic needs that make us very poor, I see government has a move to resolve the problem but many people are still blaming the government.

Actually, it is not only in your country. I am sure that this case is happen in the many countries, including of mine. So, all effort from the goverment of any country to resolve proverty will not effectively worked if the society do not support it. Both of these party should have to move together for the changes.
You can see how the japan' s goverment and their citizens support each other to get better life massively, any country should look up to the japan' s goverment and their citizen.

[nesty]

In my country i observed so many people doing rally and blame the government why the basic needs price rise and the salary is still very low and not enough for daily expenses, is this the effect of the Ukraine and russia war that makes the gas or crude oil so high at price and they pass the gas expenses to the product and it ends to very high price of the basic needs that make us very poor, I see government has a move to resolve the problem but many people are still blaming the government.

It depends on the country. There are countries that very rich that can sustain the needs of their people, If a country is rich they could possibly end poverty. But if the country belong to a third world countries, the government will not be able to end up poverty it would be harder for them because the income of the government is not sufficient to cover up the needs of its people. Some of the reasons are the continuous growth of the population, the high prices of the necessities needed by the people because of the inflation. For the third world countries it is much better if the people and government will help hand and in hand to be able to end poverty even little by little.

[SaveOurSea]

In my country i observed so many people doing rally and blame the government why the basic needs price rise and the salary is still very low and not enough for daily expenses, is this the effect of the Ukraine and russia war that makes the gas or crude oil so high at price and they pass the gas expenses to the product and it ends to very high price of the basic needs that make us very poor, I see government has a move to resolve the problem but many people are still blaming the government.

Actually, it is not only in your country. I am sure that this case is happen in the many countries, including of mine. So, all effort from the goverment of any country to resolve proverty will not effectively worked if the society do not support it. Both of these party should have to move together for the changes.
You can see how the japan' s goverment and their citizens support each other to get better life massively, any country should look up to the japan' s goverment and their citizen.

It's true that we can't just rely on the government without the support of the people,
a program or policy will run well if each party can support each other,
besides that poverty is also not a problem that can be handled easily.

[siniminomorocomunisakito]

In my country i observed so many people doing rally and blame the government why the basic needs price rise and the salary is still very low and not enough for daily expenses, is this the effect of the Ukraine and russia war that makes the gas or crude oil so high at price and they pass the gas expenses to the product and it ends to very high price of the basic needs that make us very poor, I see government has a move to resolve the problem but many people are still blaming the government.

I think, everything you convey has its own position. Yes. War only leaves the less good and endless. But, if you just keep blaming the government it feels less ethical. at least there are independent efforts from us to also take responsibility as citizens to actively participate, seek opportunities, and support the government's efforts for economic growth and per capita income later.

[Cheema02]

No government in the world can completely eradicate poverty from the system but it can be reduced to the barest minimum.  Poverty eradication is not just an issue only to be handled by the government alone, rather it is a general issue that requires collective efforts or all hands on deck to achieve such a goal, it needs individual contribution, Non-governmental organizations NGOs and with the help of the government itself it will become easier to achieve.

Poverty is a big problem of every country. In East Asian countries, poverty ratio is greater than in West countries. Poverty can be end by education.In East countries, there is no awareness, there is illiteracy and people give birth to more child than they afford. If organizations will organize seminars then poverty ratio will be minimum. Poverty is created by people own. If people will think that we have these resources and we have to  educate those people who we have, then their decisions will be better and they will contribute in economy of country. If public will be happy, government will be also happy. Public should give skills to child, in this way they will be successful in life if they will have working habits. Habits decides the future, they will be mature at early age and will take decisions correctly. When they will sit in the company of businessman they will become a business.

[Etranger]

Poverty is a big problem of every country. In East Asian countries, poverty ratio is greater than in West countries. Poverty can be end by education.In East countries, there is no awareness, there is illiteracy and people give birth to more child than they afford. If organizations will organize seminars then poverty ratio will be minimum. Poverty is created by people own. If people will think that we have these resources and we have to  educate those people who we have, then their decisions will be better and they will contribute in economy of country. If public will be happy, government will be also happy. Public should give skills to child, in this way they will be successful in life if they will have working habits. Habits decides the future, they will be mature at early age and will take decisions correctly. When they will sit in the company of businessman they will become a business.

This division that you make is too coarse. Western countries can mean the USA, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland, and can also mean Greece, Italy, Argentina, and Mexico. The economical, political, social, and educational situation in these Western countries is very different. You cannot compare Greece and Canada and say that the situation with poverty and education is equally better there than in Eastern countries. Not to mention the fact that within each of these countries the situation is also very different, depending on the region and social stratum of the population.

Just as the Eastern countries and even East Asian countries (you use two terms and I think they were East Asian countries used as synonyms) are far from homogeneous. There are countries of Eastern Europe, such as Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, and there are China and Japan. There is no way to say that education is worse in these countries. But the economic situation depends not only on what kind of education people have now. But also on the historical conditions that prevailed in these countries, and the consequences of which they are now experiencing, depending on them. Suffice it to say about the socialist past of the countries of the former Soviet bloc and the communist present of China. These factors cannot be corrected with seminars alone.

[Uruhara]

No government in the world can completely eradicate poverty from the system but it can be reduced to the barest minimum.  Poverty eradication is not just an issue only to be handled by the government alone, rather it is a general issue that requires collective efforts or all hands on deck to achieve such a goal, it needs individual contribution, Non-governmental organizations NGOs and with the help of the government itself it will become easier to achieve.

Poverty is a big problem of every country. In East Asian countries, poverty ratio is greater than in West countries. Poverty can be end by education.In East countries, there is no awareness, there is illiteracy and people give birth to more child than they afford. If organizations will organize seminars then poverty ratio will be minimum. Poverty is created by people own. If people will think that we have these resources and we have to  educate those people who we have, then their decisions will be better and they will contribute in economy of country. If public will be happy, government will be also happy. Public should give skills to child, in this way they will be successful in life if they will have working habits. Habits decides the future, they will be mature at early age and will take decisions correctly. When they will sit in the company of businessman they will become a business.

The level of educational equality is very important for the progress of a country. And an even level of education in society can also increase the opportunity to move a country towards a more developed country. It's just that getting a decent education also requires quite a large amount of capital in some countries. So there must be a government contribution in this case, such as making education fees free for the community. And after that the government needs to build awareness of the importance of education. Because in developed countries the level of education of the people is much higher. Meanwhile in developing countries. Indeed, there are still many areas that have not even been reached by technological advances. And there are still few school buildings. So many school children even have to travel kilometers to get to school. This makes some children even give up going to school.

[CODE200]

No government in the world can completely eradicate poverty from the system but it can be reduced to the barest minimum.  Poverty eradication is not just an issue only to be handled by the government alone, rather it is a general issue that requires collective efforts or all hands on deck to achieve such a goal, it needs individual contribution, Non-governmental organizations NGOs and with the help of the government itself it will become easier to achieve.

Poverty is a big problem of every country. In East Asian countries, poverty ratio is greater than in West countries. Poverty can be end by education.In East countries, there is no awareness, there is illiteracy and people give birth to more child than they afford. If organizations will organize seminars then poverty ratio will be minimum. Poverty is created by people own. If people will think that we have these resources and we have to  educate those people who we have, then their decisions will be better and they will contribute in economy of country. If public will be happy, government will be also happy. Public should give skills to child, in this way they will be successful in life if they will have working habits. Habits decides the future, they will be mature at early age and will take decisions correctly. When they will sit in the company of businessman they will become a business.

Yes, poverty is really noticeable and evident in Asian countries compare to western countries. I think poverty in Asian region can be associated with only having less access to education which hinders people from getting out of poverty. One of the possible reasons for this can also be about less job opportunities. Since they have only gotten little to no education at all, they find it difficult to find a job. As what we can see, everything is interconnected and one factor may affect all the other aspects that's why it's hard to totally eradicate poverty.

In my own perspective, we cannot really end poverty but we can at least try to minimize it. And in order for that to happen, the government, together with its citizen, should work hand in hand because I believe that it is our shared responsibility and a shared effort to reduce the cases of poverty.

 

[Peanutswar]

Different country have their people will different rights in my country we are in the era where people have the rights to vote to their government officials but as always there's a history of family matters so they keep voting those people some of the votes can be bought due to being poor, to those people who want to fight fair other people who have power doing all the things just to be part of the government, if the government will become clean and really have a good ways manage the community or even the country the community will not be suffer. Just having a good leader makes the country become sufficient and there's no poverty.

[MFahad]

Yes, poverty is really noticeable and evident in Asian countries compare to western countries. I think poverty in Asian region can be associated with only having less access to education which hinders people from getting out of poverty. One of the possible reasons for this can also be about less job opportunities. Since they have only gotten little to no education at all, they find it difficult to find a job. As what we can see, everything is interconnected and one factor may affect all the other aspects that's why it's hard to totally eradicate poverty. 

The main cause is the increasing population but they have no interest in getting education as well as in finding a job. Because of this increase in population the number of agricultural land decrease as they went to those areas to occupying their living place.

Some individuals do not go to school for getting education while some of them are getting education but the have no abilities to use their skills in order to be involved in any field for earning. As the cultured land is not enough so there are also less amount of resources which will have massive effects on the health of individuals so if their health is not well they will also be not take part in stabilizing their economic situations.

[Dimitri94]

Many people are too dependent and blame the government when poverty occurs, most countries have made maximum efforts to overcome poverty, for example are free education for up to 15 years, scholarships to other countries, training to the provision of business capital, of course not everyone can succeed to overcome poverty.

I haven't noticed anything wrong with governments when we blame them for the state of the economy in the nation. It is our responsibility to hold them accountable for it, and it is also their responsibility to take care of the country. While I agree that not everyone will be able to escape poverty, if most governments are unable to provide jobs for educated youth, how do you suppose that sort of nation won't be holding them accountable? It's okay for citizens to criticize the government, but we shouldn't depend on them. Having a second source of income is the best plan of getting out of poverty.

There is no advantage only in blaming the government. The government of a country always wants to develop its country. How the people of his country can get better services and live a better life is considered as one of the main tasks of the government of every country.
We should remember that the more active people are in the country, the government will be more stronger. The government depends on the people. If the people help their government then that government can be most powerful. Every country's government has a financial constraint. The head of government has to manage the country by considering the income and expenditure aspect. The more private companies are created in a country, the government will be more financially prosperous of that particular country. Therefore, if the people can not depend on the government but develop themselves, the country will move forward quickly.

[Ayers]

Yes, poverty is really noticeable and evident in Asian countries compare to western countries. I think poverty in Asian region can be associated with only having less access to education which hinders people from getting out of poverty. One of the possible reasons for this can also be about less job opportunities. Since they have only gotten little to no education at all, they find it difficult to find a job. As what we can see, everything is interconnected and one factor may affect all the other aspects that's why it's hard to totally eradicate poverty. 

The main cause is the increasing population but they have no interest in getting education as well as in finding a job. Because of this increase in population the number of agricultural land decrease as they went to those areas to occupying their living place.

Some individuals do not go to school for getting education while some of them are getting education but the have no abilities to use their skills in order to be involved in any field for earning. As the cultured land is not enough so there are also less amount of resources which will have massive effects on the health of individuals so if their health is not well they will also be not take part in stabilizing their economic situations.

I agree with you when you emphasize the role of education in helping us escape poverty. But there is a problem that I see today: many families are so poor that they do not have enough food to eat, and in that situation, education cannot be more important than food. This happens because some governments do not introduce any policies to improve the lives of the poor, the lowest stratum of society. Many children dream of going to school, but because their families are too poor, they cannot go to school hungry and there is no free school if they don't have money. Whether we are rich or poor depends on ourselves, but the government also bears much of the responsibility if poverty occurs on a large scale in the country.