Minimum Age to gamble

[rojan]

If a parent is unable to track the activity of children then I don't think they need to be called a parent.

If your child is been trained like how the Bible quoted it I don't think the child will go the other way round, in other case allowing the government to control your child for you in other for the child to be disciplined, that's a very wrong idea, because if the child have any little advantage of it's self he will do something the parents will regret thinking it's a good idea for him, if your child is well trained he/she will be very careful of what's he's doing and were he's going, although everyone has a life to live and if a child is above the age of 18+ he/she can do whatever he wants because he's matured enough to know what's good and what's bad and that is his/her life.

At least if parents can educate their children well from childhood to adulthood, their children will have a solid foundation that will help them develop their own potential for the good of their lives. Parents will certainly try to make their children happy. Sometimes the method is not quite right because the average parent now only pays attention to material problems for their children without approaching them as parents and having a heart-to-heart talk with their children. Parents think if they can meet their child's needs, that's enough when it's not. Children also need love from their parents, which is not something related to the physical but spiritual. And when parents can do it, children can live well.

Parents are a child's guide. In a family where parents take care of their children at all times, their children are also obliged to them. It is the responsibility of parents to give proper education to their children because they do not understand what is right and what is wrong. Parents feel the need to take care of him till a certain age. When the child is able to understand his own good and bad, he is released. However, 18 years of age is considered to be the age of majority for a child. After that it is up to him how that child will lead his life.

Yes, I think the parents of the children can teach the children properly. The parents have a big role to make a child a good human being. In the same way, the parents are there for the child to become bad. I think that if the parents of a child can teach the children right from an early age, the child will never be bad. Those parents who cannot teach their children the right education will be very bad. So we have to be very careful about these things so that we can give our children the right education.

[maydna]

~snip~

Parents are a child's guide. In a family where parents take care of their children at all times, their children are also obliged to them. It is the responsibility of parents to give proper education to their children because they do not understand what is right and what is wrong. Parents feel the need to take care of him till a certain age. When the child is able to understand his own good and bad, he is released. However, 18 years of age is considered to be the age of majority for a child. After that it is up to him how that child will lead his life.

In the family, raising children is the obligation of parents, and parents must educate their children so they don't do things that can make their lives not good in the future. It is not easy to educate their children, but by taking good care of them, they can find the right path to teaching their children until they grow up. And when they are grown up, they let their children decide what they want, but their parents will still accompany them because the parents' task of accompanying their children will be there until the parents die. This will be passed on to their children when they become parents. So, in this case, maybe the age for someone to play gambling can be changed to be over 25 years old with the assumption that someone over 25 years old is an adult who can think maturely and also has his own income. They have started to be responsible with their lives, but their parents still accompany them.

[TopTort777]

Yes, I think the parents of the children can teach the children properly. The parents have a big role to make a child a good human being. In the same way, the parents are there for the child to become bad. I think that if the parents of a child can teach the children right from an early age, the child will never be bad. Those parents who cannot teach their children the right education will be very bad. So we have to be very careful about these things so that we can give our children the right education.

I follow the rule that parents should not teach and educate their children. Of course they gonna give some basics of what is good or bad and etc. But kids are the mirror of their parents. No matter how strict you are, no matter how much time you spend teaching them and etc, they would grow up like their parents anyway. Instead of teaching them, a parent imho better teach himself, and the kid will be a copy/paste of him.

That is why, if a person is dumb and spend all of his money in gambling, has addiction, not cold headed and impatient, no matter at what age his kid will be allowed to gamble, at 14, 18, 21 or 30, he will take reckless decisions as his parent.

[tusandii]

Yes, I think the parents of the children can teach the children properly. The parents have a big role to make a child a good human being. In the same way, the parents are there for the child to become bad. I think that if the parents of a child can teach the children right from an early age, the child will never be bad. Those parents who cannot teach their children the right education will be very bad. So we have to be very careful about these things so that we can give our children the right education.

I follow the rule that parents should not teach and educate their children. Of course they gonna give some basics of what is good or bad and etc. But kids are the mirror of their parents. No matter how strict you are, no matter how much time you spend teaching them and etc, they would grow up like their parents anyway. Instead of teaching them, a parent imho better teach himself, and the kid will be a copy/paste of him.

That is why, if a person is dumb and spend all of his money in gambling, has addiction, not cold headed and impatient, no matter at what age his kid will be allowed to gamble, at 14, 18, 21 or 30, he will take reckless decisions as his parent.

No parent wants their child to get along wrong and become a child who likes to gamble.
Education of children usually depends on the attitude of the parents themselves whether they have a firm and disciplined attitude or just give advice without any direction because some of the behavior of a child is really obedient and some are a little stubborn.
School education only teaches science and insight, while the character and habits of a child are the parents' job.

If only many parents were aware of the prevalence of online gambling to the extent that they could limit their children from playing with cellphones or PCs, maybe cases of gambling for underage children could be better resolved.

[wiss19]

Could take the other side on this subject, its never too early to learn.   Its better to learn all the rules and dynamics to any large subject before engaging personally with any possibly loss risking activity, we can apply that to guns, gambling, drugs anything.  Education isn't a bad thing, that perhaps should be the emphasis not a law just saying no.  I don't especially believe government does anything useful purely making a law to fine people and nothing else; we gained nothing but a tax from their oversight and regime so useless then
  People might be horrified at this idea but I learnt statistics at an early age, its invariably helped me quantify all kinds of statistics and risks in life as well gambling factors leading to a win rather just all or nothing hopes and dreams.  For sure its a positive to educate people not blindly ban imo.

But, only if things are taken from a learning perspective. A lot of people would make the excuse that they will only do something so that they can learn about it, especially minors, but they will soon start abusing that right and will start using the thing for their pleasure or to get something out of it, which is the reason why there should always be some restrictions and regulations for certain things at certain ages in certain countries depending on the nature of the people.

That is why, though I do agree with you that there is nothing wrong in learning about things at an early age because that can be helpful in the future, there should still be some restrictions or at least the ones using those things so that they can learn about them should be under observation so that things don't go negative.

[South Park]

Yes, I think the parents of the children can teach the children properly. The parents have a big role to make a child a good human being. In the same way, the parents are there for the child to become bad. I think that if the parents of a child can teach the children right from an early age, the child will never be bad. Those parents who cannot teach their children the right education will be very bad. So we have to be very careful about these things so that we can give our children the right education.

I follow the rule that parents should not teach and educate their children. Of course they gonna give some basics of what is good or bad and etc. But kids are the mirror of their parents. No matter how strict you are, no matter how much time you spend teaching them and etc, they would grow up like their parents anyway. Instead of teaching them, a parent imho better teach himself, and the kid will be a copy/paste of him.

That is why, if a person is dumb and spend all of his money in gambling, has addiction, not cold headed and impatient, no matter at what age his kid will be allowed to gamble, at 14, 18, 21 or 30, he will take reckless decisions as his parent.

This is not always true, parents can also become a negative example for their kids, so if the kids see that their father gets violent while he drinks they may develop an aversion against drinking alcohol and never taste it at all despite the example given by their father, unfortunately this also works with virtues, so if a parent is hardworking their kids may come to despise hard work and become lazy instead, despite the advantages that being hardworking can bring to their lives.

[stomachgrowls]

Yes, I think the parents of the children can teach the children properly. The parents have a big role to make a child a good human being. In the same way, the parents are there for the child to become bad. I think that if the parents of a child can teach the children right from an early age, the child will never be bad. Those parents who cannot teach their children the right education will be very bad. So we have to be very careful about these things so that we can give our children the right education.

I follow the rule that parents should not teach and educate their children. Of course they gonna give some basics of what is good or bad and etc. But kids are the mirror of their parents. No matter how strict you are, no matter how much time you spend teaching them and etc, they would grow up like their parents anyway. Instead of teaching them, a parent imho better teach himself, and the kid will be a copy/paste of him.

That is why, if a person is dumb and spend all of his money in gambling, has addiction, not cold headed and impatient, no matter at what age his kid will be allowed to gamble, at 14, 18, 21 or 30, he will take reckless decisions as his parent.

This is not always true, parents can also become a negative example for their kids, so if the kids see that their father gets violent while he drinks they may develop an aversion against drinking alcohol and never taste it at all despite the example given by their father, unfortunately this also works with virtues, so if a parent is hardworking their kids may come to despise hard work and become lazy instead, despite the advantages that being hardworking can bring to their lives.

Or simply we cant really make out that kind of conclusion that on whatever things that we do see on parents, its not something that you could say that it would really be followed by your children.There are ones who would

really be trying out to oppose on what you have seen with your parents and go into the other side. About on age then this is would really be talking or speaking with 18-21 as which these are the casual government rules and laws on which it is really that something that would really be followed but in todays easy access or having the connection due to internet then it wont really be that so hard on finding yourself to be able to bypass these things for you to play on which it would really be that we cant really be able to stop to those people who are young to play gambling if they wanted to.They could always be having the bypass on which they would
neither be using up their parents ids and information or would be simply making use of VPN specially now that we do have crypto gambling space on which it do make things even more easier.
You could just simply tick those age verification and caution boxes then you're good to go.This is why its not something that we could completely be able to get rid of with if we do speak about
these young people to play on gambling places even if we dont want to.

[Aikidoka]

Yes, I think the parents of the children can teach the children properly. The parents have a big role to make a child a good human being. In the same way, the parents are there for the child to become bad. I think that if the parents of a child can teach the children right from an early age, the child will never be bad. Those parents who cannot teach their children the right education will be very bad. So we have to be very careful about these things so that we can give our children the right education.

I follow the rule that parents should not teach and educate their children. Of course they gonna give some basics of what is good or bad and etc. But kids are the mirror of their parents. No matter how strict you are, no matter how much time you spend teaching them and etc, they would grow up like their parents anyway. Instead of teaching them, a parent imho better teach himself, and the kid will be a copy/paste of him.

That is why, if a person is dumb and spend all of his money in gambling, has addiction, not cold headed and impatient, no matter at what age his kid will be allowed to gamble, at 14, 18, 21 or 30, he will take reckless decisions as his parent.

This is not always true, parents can also become a negative example for their kids, so if the kids see that their father gets violent while he drinks they may develop an aversion against drinking alcohol and never taste it at all despite the example given by their father, unfortunately this also works with virtues, so if a parent is hardworking their kids may come to despise hard work and become lazy instead, despite the advantages that being hardworking can bring to their lives.

Exactly, it could be the inverse. I know some kids who are very different from their parents and act totally differently. It's not a rule that kids always follow the way of their parents; sometimes they become so different and it's definitely it's a good thing in most cases. They'll just develop a strong personality and it's so good for them imho.

As you explained, kids could end up hating something they've never tried because of their parents' influence. Being too strict as a parent might lead to this. It's essential to avoid being overly strict and instead, try your best to teach them how to become good human beings in the future.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

There's age limit to gambling, parents needs to take good care of their children in knowing what they are upto and not to allow them gamble when they are yet independent, gambling is not permitted as for someone who don't have a means of working to earn a living, children under their parents authority should not be found gambling because they are expected to be learning from school while depending on their parents.

[Cling18]

There's age limit to gambling, parents needs to take good care of their children in knowing what they are upto and not to allow them gamble when they are yet independent, gambling is not permitted as for someone who don't have a means of working to earn a living, children under their parents authority should not be found gambling because they are expected to be learning from school while depending on their parents.

As early as possible, we should educate our children about the risks and negative effects of gambling to minors. We should inform them that they should avoid it while they're young as they will not be able to handle its risks. Parents has a huge responsibility on this and we can't blame everything on the child in case he falls into gambling addiction at an early age.
We should let them enjoy their childhood or teenage life away from gambling and let them do it when they can stand firm on their own.
We are the ones to blame once our kids has fallen into gambling without our kowledge because it is our role to monitor even their online activities. We should mold them while they're young and we shouldn't introduce gambling to them until they're able to provide for themselves.

[Odusko]

There's age limit to gambling, parents needs to take good care of their children in knowing what they are upto and not to allow them gamble when they are yet independent, gambling is not permitted as for someone who don't have a means of working to earn a living, children under their parents authority should not be found gambling because they are expected to be learning from school while depending on their parents.

As early as possible, we should educate our children about the risks and negative effects of gambling to minors. We should inform them that they should avoid it while they're young as they will not be able to handle its risks. Parents has a huge responsibility on this and we can't blame everything on the child in case he falls into gambling addiction at an early age.
We should let them enjoy their childhood or teenage life away from gambling and let them do it when they can stand firm on their own.
We are the ones to blame once our kids has fallen into gambling without our knowledge because it is our role to monitor even their online activities. We should mold them while they're young and we shouldn't introduce gambling to them until they're able to provide for themselves.

Depending on the part of the world where you are from, because in some places, gambling is not an overly recognized or popular activity so at that a child may grow even up to 25 years of adulthood before getting exposed to gambling, so that way he is already an adult and can determine what kind of risk that he can get involved with.
But in another part of the world where kids are easily exposed to a lot of things, then it is better to get our kids educated and prepared for what is ahead and how they can avoid getting addicted to bad habits such as gambling addiction.

[shogun47]

There's age limit to gambling, parents needs to take good care of their children in knowing what they are upto and not to allow them gamble when they are yet independent, gambling is not permitted as for someone who don't have a means of working to earn a living, children under their parents authority should not be found gambling because they are expected to be learning from school while depending on their parents.

As early as possible, we should educate our children about the risks and negative effects of gambling to minors. We should inform them that they should avoid it while they're young as they will not be able to handle its risks. Parents has a huge responsibility on this and we can't blame everything on the child in case he falls into gambling addiction at an early age.
We should let them enjoy their childhood or teenage life away from gambling and let them do it when they can stand firm on their own.
We are the ones to blame once our kids has fallen into gambling without our knowledge because it is our role to monitor even their online activities. We should mold them while they're young and we shouldn't introduce gambling to them until they're able to provide for themselves.

Depending on the part of the world where you are from, because in some places, gambling is not an overly recognized or popular activity so at that a child may grow even up to 25 years of adulthood before getting exposed to gambling, so that way he is already an adult and can determine what kind of risk that he can get involved with.
But in another part of the world where kids are easily exposed to a lot of things, then it is better to get our kids educated and prepared for what is ahead and how they can avoid getting addicted to bad habits such as gambling addiction.

I believe that has changed a lot with casinos going online and also all the advertisements they are running. Thinking back about my childhood it was completely different and gambling was just not a thing or it wasn't around like it is today. But today the players you admire are wearing shirts with gambling advertisements, they show up in advertisements and on tv screens praising gambling websites and much more than that. It also was booming around the 2000s when poker became a big thing online and they broadcasted all these events from the WSOP. That is why people get in touch with it somehow at a much younger age and with the rise of crypto casinos and no kyc sometimes it is very simple for underage people to sign up and play as well.

[Westinhome]

I believe that has changed a lot with casinos going online and also all the advertisements they are running. Thinking back about my childhood it was completely different and gambling was just not a thing or it wasn't around like it is today. But today the players you admire are wearing shirts with gambling advertisements, they show up in advertisements and on tv screens praising gambling websites and much more than that. It also was booming around the 2000s when poker became a big thing online and they broadcasted all these events from the WSOP. That is why people get in touch with it somehow at a much younger age and with the rise of crypto casinos and no kyc sometimes it is very simple for underage people to sign up and play as well.

Gambling is very close to the underage people,they use the fake Kyc to play any game which they like now.But during my younger age,I had no way to use to play the gambling.It's due to the underage problem,at my younger no one is ready to sell their Kyc for the dollars.But now it's easy to get any country Kyc,mobile number,even the video Kyc verification for the casino.During the 2000,it was hard one for the young people to play at underage.Most of my friends don't know about the online casino,now the technology and social media made this happen.The new emerge of the crypto casino was the cause of huge reach of casino among the young gamblers.

[makishart]

There's age limit to gambling, parents needs to take good care of their children in knowing what they are upto and not to allow them gamble when they are yet independent, gambling is not permitted as for someone who don't have a means of working to earn a living, children under their parents authority should not be found gambling because they are expected to be learning from school while depending on their parents.

True. The only problem if these days parents were not even knowing his responsibility to make sure his child will be staying away from gadget. The fact that if so many children knew gambling from a regularly playing gadget. There must be a filter for their child and it's parent's responsibility. Parent shall never left their childrent alone with the gadget. I do care about their child caused by gambling will be also able making their child become addicted.
I saw some cases where the childs become addicted and started to do crazy things like stealing their parent's money. The only problem if their child can also be affected by its friends. I made sure to closely monitor my child's use of gadgets and prevented them from using them without my supervision. I was very proactive in ensuring that my child was not left alone with gadget. Our assistance is really important for the future of our child.
The danger is extremely high. They necessitate our assistance to guarantee they steer clear of any unsuitable objects.

[shogun47]

I believe that has changed a lot with casinos going online and also all the advertisements they are running. Thinking back about my childhood it was completely different and gambling was just not a thing or it wasn't around like it is today. But today the players you admire are wearing shirts with gambling advertisements, they show up in advertisements and on tv screens praising gambling websites and much more than that. It also was booming around the 2000s when poker became a big thing online and they broadcasted all these events from the WSOP. That is why people get in touch with it somehow at a much younger age and with the rise of crypto casinos and no kyc sometimes it is very simple for underage people to sign up and play as well.

Gambling is very close to the underage people,they use the fake Kyc to play any game which they like now.But during my younger age,I had no way to use to play the gambling.It's due to the underage problem,at my younger no one is ready to sell their Kyc for the dollars.But now it's easy to get any country Kyc,mobile number,even the video Kyc verification for the casino.During the 2000,it was hard one for the young people to play at underage.Most of my friends don't know about the online casino,now the technology and social media made this happen.The new emerge of the crypto casino was the cause of huge reach of casino among the young gamblers.

Yes but this only applies to casinos that actually require you to provide KYC and to verify a bank account, but think about how many casinos these days don't ask for any verification at all. Not the name, not the country nor the bank account and if the country is a problem, there is VPN software. It is so easy to make an account and get started. And for those who still don't know how it works, there is also youtube with dozens of videos explaining how to circumvent certain restrictions with casinos. The possibilities to play when somebody really wants are huge.

[Onyeeze]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

[Ryu_Ar1]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

There must be at least passive income to be used as betting material because of course expecting gifts from others or maybe parents would not be very ethical if it was used for gambling.
Even though there are definitely still things like this but I think of course it should be reduced especially we should also be aware that gambling is a behaviour that is sometimes looked down upon by others although I don't really care about it.
I think in this case people who are in gambling are people who certainly have more thought and responsibility because they should be aware that this is a dangerous action if they do not control themselves properly.
I agree with what you said because there is no way that people who have no income can gamble at least it's just torturing themselves.

[Jody.Drummer]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

2 different things but if associated will be very closely related, so it would be better if the age has reached the minimum limit and already has an income.
Well in this case the age limit is based on most young people are still students and when they are at that age then it will greatly interfere with their growth and development process if they are familiar with gambling.
What you said is also true, even though someone has reached the age of maturity to do everything including gambling, it does not mean that they have an income, or they have an income but to fulfill their needs have not been fully resolved. I am of the mindset that one should have an income or at least be able to make ends meet before entering into gambling.
There are some students who are diligent and have started businesses to increase their pocket money, but most of them still ask their parents.

[Gyfts]

Also, if we find any site allowing minors to gamble, can legal action be taken against them?

Probably not. Most of the crypto casinos are based in foreign countries where your court systems will not have any jurisdiction over. It's done on purpose to avoid regulation. Your recourse with the legal system in any capacity is next to nothing. That being said, most casinos would not knowingly let a minor gamble. They'd probably ban the account.

What happens when an underage to the legally stipulated age for gambling uses an ID of a family member to register on the gambling site. Can a legal suit be made against the gambling site? Cause from what we see today there are lots of underage that are gambling secretly in online casinos without the knowledge of those casinos as their KYC provided proves someone of an eligible age.

It's not only in the position of the online casinos to monitor and sensor kids from gambling the parents of those kids and wards also have a contributive role to play ensuring their kids don't outsmart these casinos.

No, for the same reason I described above. The liability does not lie on the casino for a user fraudulently using a false ID or stolen ID to bypass KYC restrictions. Even if you were to find some liability on the casino, the chance of you bringing a successful suit against companies in foreign jurisdictions are next to nothing.

[Onyeeze]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

There must be at least passive income to be used as betting material because of course expecting gifts from others or maybe parents would not be very ethical if it was used for gambling.
Even though there are definitely still things like this but I think of course it should be reduced especially we should also be aware that gambling is a behaviour that is sometimes looked down upon by others although I don't really care about it.
I think in this case people who are in gambling are people who certainly have more thought and responsibility because they should be aware that this is a dangerous action if they do not control themselves properly.
I agree with what you said because there is no way that people who have no income can gamble at least it's just torturing themselves.

In addition gambling is pure entertainment and is not for making money why people get loss everytime is because they take gambling as source of earn a living, if somebody have a professional job and the payment is reasonable I think that playing gambling is just an entertainment for the person because it will not be after making payments or not, so that is what I'm telling you guys to understand but a poor person gambles as if gambling is the last hope of a man