Minimum Age to gamble

[Casdinyard]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

There must be at least passive income to be used as betting material because of course expecting gifts from others or maybe parents would not be very ethical if it was used for gambling.
Even though there are definitely still things like this but I think of course it should be reduced especially we should also be aware that gambling is a behaviour that is sometimes looked down upon by others although I don't really care about it.
I think in this case people who are in gambling are people who certainly have more thought and responsibility because they should be aware that this is a dangerous action if they do not control themselves properly.
I agree with what you said because there is no way that people who have no income can gamble at least it's just torturing themselves.

In addition gambling is pure entertainment and is not for making money why people get loss everytime is because they take gambling as source of earn a living, if somebody have a professional job and the payment is reasonable I think that playing gambling is just an entertainment for the person because it will not be after making payments or not, so that is what I'm telling you guys to understand but a poor person gambles as if gambling is the last hope of a man

Feel like you're going off in a tangent but I kind of get what you're trying to convey. It's true, there's dangers in gambling which is why I myself advocate for it only being used as a form of entertainment and past-time, not as something you'd actively do in search of more money. But of course people won't listen to this, kids and people with little to no financial capabilities will continue to get hooked to gambling cause apart from it being fun and all that it's also something that they see is a way to earn quick cash, which it isn't. Intervention, campaigning, and information protests are good and all that but if the people aren't willing to hear or willing to instill discipline this is going to continue to be a problem.

[Lida93]

Also, if we find any site allowing minors to gamble, can legal action be taken against them?

Probably not. Most of the crypto casinos are based in foreign countries where your court systems will not have any jurisdiction over. It's done on purpose to avoid regulation. Your recourse with the legal system in any capacity is next to nothing. That being said, most casinos would not knowingly let a minor gamble. They'd probably ban the account.

What happens when an underage to the legally stipulated age for gambling uses an ID of a family member to register on the gambling site. Can a legal suit be made against the gambling site? Cause from what we see today there are lots of underage that are gambling secretly in online casinos without the knowledge of those casinos as their KYC provided proves someone of an eligible age.

It's not only in the position of the online casinos to monitor and sensor kids from gambling the parents of those kids and wards also have a contributive role to play ensuring their kids don't outsmart these casinos.

No, for the same reason I described above. The liability does not lie on the casino for a user fraudulently using a false ID or stolen ID to bypass KYC restrictions. Even if you were to find some liability on the casino, the chance of you bringing a successful suit against companies in foreign jurisdictions are next to nothing.

Now it's clear to me that lack of foreign jurisdiction is part of the scattering reasons   some countries places restrictions to most of these online casinos outside their jurisdiction making it complex, challenging and frustrating for her citizens to have access in using them to gamble.

[slapper]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

2 different things but if associated will be very closely related, so it would be better if the age has reached the minimum limit and already has an income.
Well in this case the age limit is based on most young people are still students and when they are at that age then it will greatly interfere with their growth and development process if they are familiar with gambling.
What you said is also true, even though someone has reached the age of maturity to do everything including gambling, it does not mean that they have an income, or they have an income but to fulfill their needs have not been fully resolved. I am of the mindset that one should have an income or at least be able to make ends meet before entering into gambling.
There are some students who are diligent and have started businesses to increase their pocket money, but most of them still ask their parents.

That's a very convincing case you made. Gambling, like many other risky pursuits, requires maturity and financial security. It's evident that you think people shouldn't risk unless they've demonstrated their financial security, and that's a reasonable viewpoint to have

On the other hand, I think it's important to stress the need of teaching people how to gamble responsibly. Learning how to manage money and recognize the hazards of gambling are essential life skills. Everyone, regardless of age, employment status, or education level, will be able to make better decisions as a result

Student gambling is a serious concern, but it may also be a symptom of a broader societal crisis. Students aren't the only ones who could benefit from better financial education

[terrific]

Now it's clear to me that lack of foreign jurisdiction is part of the scattering reasons   some countries places restrictions to most of these online casinos outside their jurisdiction making it complex, challenging and frustrating for her citizens to have access in using them to gamble.

It varies to the casinos where they're operating and it's true that the local governance and rules do affect them and that's why some countries have restricted people to gamble online if they don't meet the minimum age.
While some, they're not strict at all and don't care at all and that only shows what type of government they are. Because if they do care for their people, we're going to see some strict rules and will implement it badly.
It is because for the good of their people and not just to have some way of profiting through another industry which is gambling. For we know, the tax here is a lot to take.

[Jody.Drummer]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

2 different things but if associated will be very closely related, so it would be better if the age has reached the minimum limit and already has an income.
Well in this case the age limit is based on most young people are still students and when they are at that age then it will greatly interfere with their growth and development process if they are familiar with gambling.
What you said is also true, even though someone has reached the age of maturity to do everything including gambling, it does not mean that they have an income, or they have an income but to fulfill their needs have not been fully resolved. I am of the mindset that one should have an income or at least be able to make ends meet before entering into gambling.
There are some students who are diligent and have started businesses to increase their pocket money, but most of them still ask their parents.

That's a very convincing case you made. Gambling, like many other risky pursuits, requires maturity and financial security. It's evident that you think people shouldn't risk unless they've demonstrated their financial security, and that's a reasonable viewpoint to have

On the other hand, I think it's important to stress the need of teaching people how to gamble responsibly. Learning how to manage money and recognize the hazards of gambling are essential life skills. Everyone, regardless of age, employment status, or education level, will be able to make better decisions as a result

Student gambling is a serious concern, but it may also be a symptom of a broader societal crisis. Students aren't the only ones who could benefit from better financial education

They must understand the definition of gambling thoroughly, if they understand that they will be able to play gambling responsibly. Let's not go too far, I'm going to talk about myself in this case and also I think that you also have the same thoughts about this. We, I especially would be very irresponsible in our gambling if we didn't understand what gambling is, right? Because in short we would definitely think that gambling is an instant way to get money, when in practice it is not. We do it for fun, so that we are still in a good financial state.

[Lida93]

Now it's clear to me that lack of foreign jurisdiction is part of the scattering reasons   some countries places restrictions to most of these online casinos outside their jurisdiction making it complex, challenging and frustrating for her citizens to have access in using them to gamble.

It varies to the casinos where they're operating and it's true that the local governance and rules do affect them and that's why some countries have restricted people to gamble online if they don't meet the minimum age.
While some, they're not strict at all and don't care at all and that only shows what type of government they are. Because if they do care for their people, we're going to see some strict rules and will implement it badly.
It is because for the good of their people and not just to have some way of profiting through another industry which is gambling. For we know, the tax here is a lot to take.

Yeah there are governments with economy that the tax income they get from casinos industry is very profiting that they give blind sight claiming to be ignorant to the liable actions that these casinos flaunts at the detriment of their citizens rights. But can such government in real sense of governance be termed as government for the people when it can't stand up for her citizens out of fear of having the heavy income tax from the industry affected by strict rules on them.

[wiss19]

As early as possible, we should educate our children about the risks and negative effects of gambling to minors. We should inform them that they should avoid it while they're young as they will not be able to handle its risks. Parents has a huge responsibility on this and we can't blame everything on the child in case he falls into gambling addiction at an early age.
We should let them enjoy their childhood or teenage life away from gambling and let them do it when they can stand firm on their own.
We are the ones to blame once our kids has fallen into gambling without our kowledge because it is our role to monitor even their online activities. We should mold them while they're young and we shouldn't introduce gambling to them until they're able to provide for themselves.

Definitely, parents have their role to play, and they should play it with affection, calmness, and wisdom. A lot of parents behave very harshly with their children, not because they don't love them, but because they think they can control them this way, but the reality is totally opposite of that. Children who are beaten or scolded for every small thing, that are kept inside and not let to do anything at all, tend to do more bad things when they get older and get to go out.

So parents should always behave very softly, teach their children what is right and what is wrong but do it in a way that should stay in their hearts and minds forever, and they shouldn't do bad things out of love and respect for their parents because they will think they will get hurt or disrespected if their children are found involved in bad things.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Could take the other side on this subject, its never too early to learn.   Its better to learn all the rules and dynamics to any large subject before engaging personally with any possibly loss risking activity, we can apply that to guns, gambling, drugs anything.  Education isn't a bad thing, that perhaps should be the emphasis not a law just saying no.  I don't especially believe government does anything useful purely making a law to fine people and nothing else; we gained nothing but a tax from their oversight and regime so useless then
  People might be horrified at this idea but I learnt statistics at an early age, its invariably helped me quantify all kinds of statistics and risks in life as well gambling factors leading to a win rather just all or nothing hopes and dreams.  For sure its a positive to educate people not blindly ban imo.

Well, you have to be aware of something, when we have children we always want to take them on the best path, but things are already very hard, children have access to the Internet in an impressive way, and sometimes these things are easier for them. that they know about casinos, sports betting and everything that has to do with games, obviously they learn things about money, how to do it, an endless number of things, that is why it is partly good that they know, even though they are denied knowledge, they will acquire it very quickly, you cannot go against the current, what must be done here is to guide and supervise.

Children or young people before the age of 18 (which is when they are considered of legal age) should be told about everything, quickly because I am sure that they have already discovered many things before speaking to them for themselves, now the information is there just around the corner and in a very crude way, this is something that it is difficult for us to cover up, no matter how much we want to, we have to Accept that things are Difficult when it comes to hiding information from them , personally my son has 8 years old and Knows many things, her mother gave her a phone, where what she does is play and play , I don't really agree with that , because I prefer that she use the phone to learn languages, now my 22-month-old girl loves to Watch tv and the mother lends her phone to what without Reading knows how to find the programs that he likes, I don't know how he does it, but he does it , that's why as parents you have to be very aware of Everything you watch, no It is good that their stages pass like this without living them as it is , Childhood and Youth is something that is happening to children very prematurely, that is why Gambling, casinos should be told their risks and that when they enter they should It will be when they are of legal age and know something about the Value of money, which is why I Believe that the best age to Consider Themselves an adult is 18.

[Pandu Geddon]

They must understand the definition of gambling thoroughly, if they understand that they will be able to play gambling responsibly. Let's not go too far, I'm going to talk about myself in this case and also I think that you also have the same thoughts about this. We, I especially would be very irresponsible in our gambling if we didn't understand what gambling is, right? Because in short we would definitely think that gambling is an instant way to get money, when in practice it is not. We do it for fun, so that we are still in a good financial state.

the real meaning of gambling which must be explained to anyone who wants to start gambling. including teenagers who are starting to understand and have access to gambling.
they must be taught to be responsible for the risky actions they take. however, those who are not yet financially strong are not encouraged to gamble. because now online casinos are very easy to access. even school children with their pocket money can also do gambling. maybe some online casinos will have age restrictions. but when they don't ask for KYC it will be very accessible for kids.

[ajiz138]

the real meaning of gambling which must be explained to anyone who wants to start gambling. including teenagers who are starting to understand and have access to gambling.
they must be taught to be responsible for the risky actions they take. however, those who are not yet financially strong are not encouraged to gamble. because now online casinos are very easy to access. even school children with their pocket money can also do gambling. maybe some online casinos will have age restrictions. but when they don't ask for KYC it will be very accessible for kids.

It is difficult to advise them because they can access silently without the need to ask anyone, gambling sites have now become commonplace and can be found in any social network because gambling promotions spread everywhere.

They should already think that responsibility is important, if not then this will cause new problems for their psychologists, especially in their finances, especially with a student who is underage, of course they only rely on pocket money not from their own income, so it is important to know the risks of causing a big defeat.

Yes, that's what I said, online gambling sites are easily accessible to anyone including minors, it is difficult to know them thoroughly.

[Blitzboy]

Could take the other side on this subject, its never too early to learn.   Its better to learn all the rules and dynamics to any large subject before engaging personally with any possibly loss risking activity, we can apply that to guns, gambling, drugs anything.  Education isn't a bad thing, that perhaps should be the emphasis not a law just saying no.  I don't especially believe government does anything useful purely making a law to fine people and nothing else; we gained nothing but a tax from their oversight and regime so useless then
  People might be horrified at this idea but I learnt statistics at an early age, its invariably helped me quantify all kinds of statistics and risks in life as well gambling factors leading to a win rather just all or nothing hopes and dreams.  For sure its a positive to educate people not blindly ban imo.

Well, you have to be aware of something, when we have children we always want to take them on the best path, but things are already very hard, children have access to the Internet in an impressive way, and sometimes these things are easier for them. that they know about casinos, sports betting and everything that has to do with games, obviously they learn things about money, how to do it, an endless number of things, that is why it is partly good that they know, even though they are denied knowledge, they will acquire it very quickly, you cannot go against the current, what must be done here is to guide and supervise.

Children or young people before the age of 18 (which is when they are considered of legal age) should be told about everything, quickly because I am sure that they have already discovered many things before speaking to them for themselves, now the information is there just around the corner and in a very crude way, this is something that it is difficult for us to cover up, no matter how much we want to, we have to Accept that things are Difficult when it comes to hiding information from them , personally my son has 8 years old and Knows many things, her mother gave her a phone, where what she does is play and play , I don't really agree with that , because I prefer that she use the phone to learn languages, now my 22-month-old girl loves to Watch tv and the mother lends her phone to what without Reading knows how to find the programs that he likes, I don't know how he does it, but he does it , that's why as parents you have to be very aware of Everything you watch, no It is good that their stages pass like this without living them as it is , Childhood and Youth is something that is happening to children very prematurely, that is why Gambling, casinos should be told their risks and that when they enter they should It will be when they are of legal age and know something about the Value of money, which is why I Believe that the best age to Consider Themselves an adult is 18.

Your son already having access to a phone at 8 might be a bit premature... But then again, who am I to judge?

That being said, I believe we're all in agreement that, as much as we'd love to shield our kids from the world, it's not entirely possible. Knowledge about the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly, like casinos and betting, is inevitable. The best we can do is guide them.

As for the idea of introducing them to gambling... well, just say there are more enjoyable ways to lose money. But if they're keen on learning the value of money, its an unconventional, yet effective teacher. Im not endorsing underage gambling, but when they're of legal age, a quick visit to the casino might do more good than harm. After all, losing one's monthly allowance at the blackjack table is an unforgettable lesson in financial management

[shogun47]

the real meaning of gambling which must be explained to anyone who wants to start gambling. including teenagers who are starting to understand and have access to gambling.
they must be taught to be responsible for the risky actions they take. however, those who are not yet financially strong are not encouraged to gamble. because now online casinos are very easy to access. even school children with their pocket money can also do gambling. maybe some online casinos will have age restrictions. but when they don't ask for KYC it will be very accessible for kids.

It is difficult to advise them because they can access silently without the need to ask anyone, gambling sites have now become commonplace and can be found in any social network because gambling promotions spread everywhere.

They should already think that responsibility is important, if not then this will cause new problems for their psychologists, especially in their finances, especially with a student who is underage, of course they only rely on pocket money not from their own income, so it is important to know the risks of causing a big defeat.

Yes, that's what I said, online gambling sites are easily accessible to anyone including minors, it is difficult to know them thoroughly.

You also have all these affiliate programs the casinos are running, meaning that there is a real incentive for people who get registered to also recommend a casino to their friends. If age doesn't matter anymore as many casinos run without KYC and any other checks even for age, those who are already registered can literally lure everyone into playing on a platform. It is how the whole system is set up that the only protection against it should happen at an age young enough when it is obviously not too late and old enough that kids can understand the consequences adults are trying to explain to them.

[Ryu_Ar1]

I don't know for people but I know very well that someone supposed to have a payable job before the person have to join betting in the gambling, so I know that anyone who receiving salary is liable to stake in gambling, but using age as a barrier is not good because somebody can be at age of 25 years but it doesn't have no work or job but is a gambler it will make the person to be addicted in gambling because all its hope will be in gambling, why another person who have a job will not depend on gambling, we are suppose to be looking at the job not the age before you can be allow to gamble

There must be at least passive income to be used as betting material because of course expecting gifts from others or maybe parents would not be very ethical if it was used for gambling.
Even though there are definitely still things like this but I think of course it should be reduced especially we should also be aware that gambling is a behaviour that is sometimes looked down upon by others although I don't really care about it.
I think in this case people who are in gambling are people who certainly have more thought and responsibility because they should be aware that this is a dangerous action if they do not control themselves properly.
I agree with what you said because there is no way that people who have no income can gamble at least it's just torturing themselves.

In addition gambling is pure entertainment and is not for making money why people get loss everytime is because they take gambling as source of earn a living, if somebody have a professional job and the payment is reasonable I think that playing gambling is just an entertainment for the person because it will not be after making payments or not, so that is what I'm telling you guys to understand but a poor person gambles as if gambling is the last hope of a man

But in conditions like now, believe it or not there are still many people who hope that gambling can change their economic conditions.
Even though this may be the most extreme way to change lives because in the end this will only make the people who do it harder but the fact is that many people can be said to gamble for their living expenses.
This kind of thing happens when frustration where their lives in terms of the economy that runs stagnant and actually experiencing setbacks that make them want something instant to get benefits and gambling is an option for them.
Not that in this case I support the behaviour that is done but in reality today there are still many who do gambling as if it can change their lives.

[terrific]

It varies to the casinos where they're operating and it's true that the local governance and rules do affect them and that's why some countries have restricted people to gamble online if they don't meet the minimum age.
While some, they're not strict at all and don't care at all and that only shows what type of government they are. Because if they do care for their people, we're going to see some strict rules and will implement it badly.
It is because for the good of their people and not just to have some way of profiting through another industry which is gambling. For we know, the tax here is a lot to take.

Yeah there are governments with economy that the tax income they get from casinos industry is very profiting that they give blind sight claiming to be ignorant to the liable actions that these casinos flaunts at the detriment of their citizens rights. But can such government in real sense of governance be termed as government for the people when it can't stand up for her citizens out of fear of having the heavy income tax from the industry affected by strict rules on them.

People and its government are just turning its eyes blind so that they can benefit from the tax that they're getting from the gambling industry. They're only going to take some action if there are complaints that have allowed minimum age or lower than that to gamble into casinos that are operating within their jurisdiction and inside the casino's premises, the physical ones. While its people do get their fair share from the taxation but morals and thoughts are mixed up with it.

[famososMuertos]

Years ago, I don't remember the exact year but it was at the beginning of the last decade those golden years of poker, there were several cases of players who won important tournaments, and when they tried to withdraw their winnings it turned out that they were minors.

 Specifically it was poker Star, it is not so rare for minors to play in casinos, the point is that, if you win you need an adult to withdraw the money.

[klidex]

It varies to the casinos where they're operating and it's true that the local governance and rules do affect them and that's why some countries have restricted people to gamble online if they don't meet the minimum age.
While some, they're not strict at all and don't care at all and that only shows what type of government they are. Because if they do care for their people, we're going to see some strict rules and will implement it badly.
It is because for the good of their people and not just to have some way of profiting through another industry which is gambling. For we know, the tax here is a lot to take.

Yeah there are governments with economy that the tax income they get from casinos industry is very profiting that they give blind sight claiming to be ignorant to the liable actions that these casinos flaunts at the detriment of their citizens rights. But can such government in real sense of governance be termed as government for the people when it can't stand up for her citizens out of fear of having the heavy income tax from the industry affected by strict rules on them.

People and its government are just turning its eyes blind so that they can benefit from the tax that they're getting from the gambling industry. They're only going to take some action if there are complaints that have allowed minimum age or lower than that to gamble into casinos that are operating within their jurisdiction and inside the casino's premises, the physical ones. While its people do get their fair share from the taxation but morals and thoughts are mixed up with it.

Countries that let all people continue to gamble without minimal restrictions and after that charge taxes from gambling it something normal but I'm sure the country has a very good economy.
Because we know that the income from gambling is very large and the taxes that are obtained for the country are also very large and that makes the economy better without experiencing any difficulties.
It just that minors are the problem because it very bad if they are young but have often gambled and become addicted because they have strong reasons because the state allows it.
So all this still has a positive side and a negative side

[kamvreto]

It varies to the casinos where they're operating and it's true that the local governance and rules do affect them and that's why some countries have restricted people to gamble online if they don't meet the minimum age.
While some, they're not strict at all and don't care at all and that only shows what type of government they are. Because if they do care for their people, we're going to see some strict rules and will implement it badly.
It is because for the good of their people and not just to have some way of profiting through another industry which is gambling. For we know, the tax here is a lot to take.

Yeah there are governments with economy that the tax income they get from casinos industry is very profiting that they give blind sight claiming to be ignorant to the liable actions that these casinos flaunts at the detriment of their citizens rights. But can such government in real sense of governance be termed as government for the people when it can't stand up for her citizens out of fear of having the heavy income tax from the industry affected by strict rules on them.

People and its government are just turning its eyes blind so that they can benefit from the tax that they're getting from the gambling industry. They're only going to take some action if there are complaints that have allowed minimum age or lower than that to gamble into casinos that are operating within their jurisdiction and inside the casino's premises, the physical ones. While its people do get their fair share from the taxation but morals and thoughts are mixed up with it.

Countries that let all people continue to gamble without minimal restrictions and after that charge taxes from gambling it something normal but I'm sure the country has a very good economy.
Because we know that the income from gambling is very large and the taxes that are obtained for the country are also very large and that makes the economy better without experiencing any difficulties.
It just that minors are the problem because it very bad if they are young but have often gambled and become addicted because they have strong reasons because the state allows it.
So all this still has a positive side and a negative side

Filtering gambling from minors is quite difficult in today's modern times. Just see how internet access can be enjoyed by anyone, even gambling sites or games can be played easily even though they are blocked. Some gambling games like slot gambling are very easy nowadays. even minors who already have their own device can freely play it. this depends on how parents are monitoring, so that parents will play a very important role in limiting gambling games for underage children. The government only knows about taxes, those who are legal may have an age limit for access, but illegal casinos don't.

[Lida93]

It varies to the casinos where they're operating and it's true that the local governance and rules do affect them and that's why some countries have restricted people to gamble online if they don't meet the minimum age.
While some, they're not strict at all and don't care at all and that only shows what type of government they are. Because if they do care for their people, we're going to see some strict rules and will implement it badly.
It is because for the good of their people and not just to have some way of profiting through another industry which is gambling. For we know, the tax here is a lot to take.

Yeah there are governments with economy that the tax income they get from casinos industry is very profiting that they give blind sight claiming to be ignorant to the liable actions that these casinos flaunts at the detriment of their citizens rights. But can such government in real sense of governance be termed as government for the people when it can't stand up for her citizens out of fear of having the heavy income tax from the industry affected by strict rules on them.

People and its government are just turning its eyes blind so that they can benefit from the tax that they're getting from the gambling industry. They're only going to take some action if there are complaints that have allowed minimum age or lower than that to gamble into casinos that are operating within their jurisdiction and inside the casino's premises, the physical ones. While its people do get their fair share from the taxation but morals and thoughts are mixed up with it.

Countries that let all people continue to gamble without minimal restrictions and after that charge taxes from gambling it something normal but I'm sure the country has a very good economy.
Because we know that the income from gambling is very large and the taxes that are obtained for the country are also very large and that makes the economy better without experiencing any difficulties.
It just that minors are the problem because it very bad if they are young but have often gambled and become addicted because they have strong reasons because the state allows it.
So all this still has a positive side and a negative side

Filtering gambling from minors is quite difficult in today's modern times. Just see how internet access can be enjoyed by anyone, even gambling sites or games can be played easily even though they are blocked. Some gambling games like slot gambling are very easy nowadays. even minors who already have their own device can freely play it. this depends on how parents are monitoring, so that parents will play a very important role in limiting gambling games for underage children. The government only knows about taxes, those who are legal may have an age limit for access, but illegal casinos don't.

@kamvreto if that's the case then parents needs to do alot more than they are doing by giving much attention to the kind of games their kids plays as they growing. As parents we ought to set rules and standards for our little kids on what they are allowed to take pleasure in particularly home video games that can breed  gambling thoughts in them(children would always want to try new things at another level), as they grow up to teenage and adult age they already have a way of thinking from how they have been groomed and deviating won't be unlikely.

These casinos mean business especially those illegally operated ones they don't care the harm it does to children gamblers be it that business is booming and if worst comes to worst they just bribe their way through corrupt individuals in the government that are supposed to be the appropriate authority to look into and curb such menace, and keep on with their business.

[ethereumhunter]

Years ago, I don't remember the exact year but it was at the beginning of the last decade those golden years of poker, there were several cases of players who won important tournaments, and when they tried to withdraw their winnings it turned out that they were minors.

 Specifically it was poker Star, it is not so rare for minors to play in casinos, the point is that, if you win you need an adult to withdraw the money.

If the tournament was held online, minors could ask an adult to verify their account. But if it's an offline tournament, I don't think minors can participate because there must be terms and conditions that don't allow minors to participate.

But maybe if during the tournament cameras were watching the players, minors would also not be able to participate because they would be seen on the camera and show that they were still minors. In conclusion, maybe minors can still play gambling freely and when they need verification, they will ask adults to do it.

[Juse14]

These casinos mean business especially those illegally operated ones they don't care the harm it does to children gamblers be it that business is booming and if worst comes to worst they just bribe their way through corrupt individuals in the government that are supposed to be the appropriate authority to look into and curb such menace, and keep on with their business.

So far I have not found any special requirements to enter online gambling sites or a minimum age. So as long as they understand how to register, this gambling site is easily accessible to both young and old alike. But it is very unfortunate because the government's lack of role, especially in my country, in handling and educating about illegal gambling is still not optimal in its implementation so that many students are involved in this gambling.

Students who should focus on learning and self-development but what happens are that many of them get involved in gambling. This is not wrong because gambling is everyone's right, it's just that here it's just a matter of time, which isn't right if the student's age is already playing gambling, where the financials still rely on parental support. And when the government's role is lacking, what must be strengthened is the role of parents in educating their children