[update] jamyr trust

[examplens]

I dont even oppose the flag except
the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+

(a single character ... this reminded me of that time when I first engaged in a convo with Royse)

Do you really come here to complain about inaccurate feedback because of "+"?
At the same time, I didn't see that you gave any plan for paying off the debt.

Thanks for the Judgement I wish you guys were this engaged or enthusiastic back when I was  ... well that.

Are you being sarcastic here or what?

[hugeblack]

the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+

(a single character ... this reminded me of that time when I first engaged in a convo with Royse)

I searched in the comments of the trust and found that I was the only one who used the wording of 0.003+. the + sign after the number indicates that there is an additional task that was supposed to be done for that amount.

In general, I reviewed the response before editing, and this line was not present, so I think that you are trying to find a moral justification for your scam. I just hope you remember that money doesn't grow on trees and give back money, trust can be earned and it will generate more money instead of quick 0.003 BTC.

[holydarkness]

the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+

(a single character ... this reminded me of that time when I first engaged in a convo with Royse)

I searched in the comments of the trust and found that I was the only one who used the wording of 0.003+. the + sign after the number indicates that there is an additional task that was supposed to be done for that amount.

In general, I reviewed the response before editing, and this line was not present, so I think that you are trying to find a moral justification for your scam. I just hope you remember that money doesn't grow on trees and give back money, trust can be earned and it will generate more money instead of quick 0.003 BTC.

Umm... a bit correction, if I may? No, you're not alone. Royse also leave a feedback with 0.003+

[Adbitco]

I was just wondering why would a Sr. Member will scam a 90-100$ amount  

This account may have an army of alt accounts, or this account may have been sold/hacked^[1]. I am not good at finding alt accounts, but if a topic was created about it, we may find an alt account in one of the active campaigns and be able to recover your money.

I have tagged jamyr red and I support the flag. At least if he has no time for the review, he can send the money back. To send bitcoin from a wallet takes just little time.

I'm not going to delete it and will change it into natural trust it if it gets resolved but I do remember coming across this account username somewhere.

Flag supported

[1]

7/2/2020 6:47:24 PM   password reset via email
7/25/2020 9:08:58 AM   password reset via email
12/30/2020 10:58:34 AM   password reset via secret question
12/30/2020 10:58:48 AM   password reset via secret question

I think lovesmayfamilis and some others are the proper person who may look into that account to find out if there is alt because receiving payment without completing task is something very bad especially when the said user couldn't meet up with the review why not he refund his or her money as clearly stated. Lastly for a user to be comfortably relaxed without making moved to refunds show that there are lots of Alt maybe he has sacrifice to lose the account without thinking twice.

[Gladitorcomeback]

the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+  

Royse has explained you and i hope you have no words after that but still if you are unhappy with plus sign then don't worry, you just pay 0.003 Btc to which you scammed and i will pay + from your side. are you agree now?

If you are real owner of this account then still you have 37$ in your wallet and you should pay back because you are excusing that you have no fund..

current Fund in your wallets:
0x84c5ad0de7c8327109f79a98a3ddced8879bf15e : 37$ worth of Eth

used this address in 2020 for [BOUNTY] Emporium.Finance bounty.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5291652.msg55704033#msg55704033

I think lovesmayfamilis and some others are the proper person who may look into that account to find out if there is alt because receiving payment without completing task is something very bad especially when the said user couldn't meet up with the review why not he refund his or her money as clearly stated. Lastly for a user to be comfortably relaxed without making moved to refunds show that there are lots of Alt maybe he has sacrifice to lose the account without thinking twice.

Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.

[Ultegra134]

What makes it a lot more difficult than it already is, is that $78 is almost 1/4(sometimes even more than 1/4) of the total average monthly salary here in the Philippines.

If I'd be given the opportunity to earn a week's worth of salary in a short amount of time, I'd take it!
I don't get it: if 0.003 Bitcoin is worth so much you can't even pay it back, wasting the opportunity to earn it is just stupid.

Certainly, even though I'm not situated in a third-world country as others mentioned, $80 for a job that would require me to work for 2-3 hours at most is a bargain. I didn't make that amount of money in two days when I was working, let alone now that I'm practically unemployed. The accused had a simple job that he agreed to do, and assuming that he didn't have the time, he should have turned down the offer and returned the money immediately. It's astonishing that such opportunities do not come often on the forum; I myself hadn't noticed it, because if I did, I'd be willing to participate. On top of that, a successful review would open up more opportunities in the future; how can someone not see this?

And I don't understand—is the accused being ironic now? What is this reply, "Bye for now"? I don't get it; is he implying that he's not going to return the money after apologizing in the first place? I'm not against charging interest, since that's how a loan would act, but in the meantime, it's of outmost importance for even the starting 0.003 BTC to be returned.

[light_warrior]

Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.

At least one alt this jamyr has. I think that's pretty strong evidence that these two accounts are connected.

jamyr
piso456

Proof

So now I found out that staking an address here, is one of the important things member should do.

3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK

The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.

1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

This other address is a blockchain.info address.

[ Archive ]

Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---

---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----

[ Archive ]

[Ultegra134]

Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.

At least one alt this jamyr has. I think that's pretty strong evidence that these two accounts are connected.

jamyr
piso456

Proof

So now I found out that staking an address here, is one of the important things member should do.

3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK

The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.

1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

This other address is a blockchain.info address.

[ Archive ]

Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---

---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----

[ Archive ]

The account does belong to user Jamyr; however, in the thread you quoted, I'm understanding that he's trying to recover his account, which for some reason he has lost access to. Moreover, this alt account hasn't been used since November 2022, but it seems that the two accounts were used simultaneously at some point. It's intriguing that the alt account was created two months after the account named "Jamyr", so I wouldn't rule out the possibility of him purchasing the account after some time. However, there's no evidence to back up such a statement.

[AB de Royse777]

I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.

@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim

I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195

suchmoon, NeuroticFish, yahoo62278, LoyceV, examplens, ABCbits, TryNinja, dbshck, Husna QA, Fivestar4everMVP, cryptofrka, shasan, JeromeTash, lovesmayfamilis, notblox1, Little Mouse, jokers10, Mahdirakib, Woodie, ScamViruS, GazetaBitcoin, FatFork, NotATether, Ultegra134, Charles-Tim, ajiz138, Smartvirus, Poker Player, Igebotz, decodx, paid2, Learn Bitcoin, robelneo, coin-investor, acroman08, BoXXoB, shoreno, PX-Z, Wapfika, SamReomo, komisariatku, Gladitorcomeback, Unknown Op

[jamyr]

I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.

@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim

I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195

suchmoon, NeuroticFish, yahoo62278, LoyceV, examplens, ABCbits, TryNinja, dbshck, Husna QA, Fivestar4everMVP, cryptofrka, shasan, JeromeTash, lovesmayfamilis, notblox1, Little Mouse, jokers10, Mahdirakib, Woodie, ScamViruS, GazetaBitcoin, FatFork, NotATether, Ultegra134, Charles-Tim, ajiz138, Smartvirus, Poker Player, Igebotz, decodx, paid2, Learn Bitcoin, robelneo, coin-investor, acroman08, BoXXoB, shoreno, PX-Z, Wapfika, SamReomo, komisariatku, Gladitorcomeback, Unknown Op

First id like to apologize to everyone in this forum, and thank Royse for even taking the time to appeal for my sake.
For what its worth, i promise that i will try my very best to lessen my delinquent behavior, id like it to be gone but I know i cant promise to be 100% of the time. Thanks for considering, i missed you all.

Code:

Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

Message:
to tardiness and delinquency!

----begin signature----
HK0qj+ztEZLH3ryfmoOD8IZQVc8JAHZO+z32jHGLKYoSUCdwcdNSshr1smdGokUMIxgvUY+SiyAdrjABZNDWQU8=
----end signature----

[Poker Player]

I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.

I understand that there has been PM conversation between you, otherwise this bump after a year is not very well understood. I might remove my support for the flag but once you've convinced 40 people to support the flag I don't think they're all going to remove it just because of this bump. Maybe you'll have better luck with the tags, though.

[PX-Z]

I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.

Idk if the fund was refunded or settled by whatever private talk but since it's requested from the creator of the flag, then i'll remove my support/opinion into this.

I hope this will be the last strike from the user, last time it was a loan default. While it's easy to delete opinion on flags, negative tag will always depends on the giver and their principles.

[yahoo62278]

I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag. jamyr is a good human being and he needs a chance.

@JollyGood, @ScamViruS, @JeromeTash, @Little Mouse, @hugeblack, @Charles-Tim

I removed support from the flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3195

suchmoon, NeuroticFish, yahoo62278, LoyceV, examplens, ABCbits, TryNinja, dbshck, Husna QA, Fivestar4everMVP, cryptofrka, shasan, JeromeTash, lovesmayfamilis, notblox1, Little Mouse, jokers10, Mahdirakib, Woodie, ScamViruS, GazetaBitcoin, FatFork, NotATether, Ultegra134, Charles-Tim, ajiz138, Smartvirus, Poker Player, Igebotz, decodx, paid2, Learn Bitcoin, robelneo, coin-investor, acroman08, BoXXoB, shoreno, PX-Z, Wapfika, SamReomo, komisariatku, Gladitorcomeback, Unknown Op

I have no issue removing my support, but I do think that you might consider a neutral for reference on this topic and if he repeats his offense change it to red and be done with it.

Totally your decision on whether to leave the neutral or not to, but I would want some sort of reference and Jamyr to feel like he is being held accountable for the offense and know that he cannot screw up his chance.

[Wapfika]

I removed my support to the flag since you already settled privately on the amount involved. I frequently saw jamyr on our local board before as helpful user when he is still active.

I hope for the betterment that he will not be involved on anything that related to financial dealings. I agree on the opinion above that neutral tag is necessary to make other user aware about this issue. Good for you that everything settled after a year.

[LoyceV]

I will request everyone who left negative for the incident, please feel free to remove your tag.

I've removed my Support because at least one of those statements is invalid now:

jamyr did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act

Do you mind sharing which one of the two happened?

[coin-investor]

I removed my support to the flag since you already settled privately on the amount involved. I frequently saw jamyr on our local board before as helpful user when he is still active.

I hope for the betterment that he will not be involved on anything that related to financial dealings. I agree on the opinion above that neutral tag is necessary to make other user aware about this issue. Good for you that everything settled after a year.

I also removed the tag Anyone can change their ways if they really mean to, I have to read the feedbacks to refresh my memory on the issue because I supported a lot of flags.
And I too agree that there should be a neutral tag to remind him of what he has done, maybe in the future this too will go away if he proves himself trustworthy and establishes his reputation.

[examplens]

I withdrew my flag support.
However, I think that the jamyr deserves at least a neutral mark because there was obviously a problem that was not handled more correctly. Also, he has a similar problem with loan defaulting from before, and later fixing things.

Considering the inactivity for a certain period, did someone demand from jamyr to confirm the ownership of the account and to sign one of the previously used addresses?

[AB de Royse777]

To everyone who wanted to know more details (I will also use this post as the reference of a neutral feedback I am going to leave for jamyr).

jamyr failed to submit the job and retuning the money but that was long ago. Recently I found out that he helped me a lot in different things from long time but he never mentioned about his past and I was not aware too. He also never asked to give him any return of favor.

When I asked for his profile URL earlier today for some reasons, he gave me the URL and I discovered everything that happened in the past. He proved me a good person.

Good people deserve chances in their life. I would like to give him one that he deserves. Hope he will not do the same mistake in future.

[jamyr]

Royse you just proved to be a very good stock, that I regret to have not invested more during your presale period. Though I would like to warn you now, to not put too much good expectation from me. I'm still a degenerate, but I will do my best to keep my nose clean.

PokerPlayer  PX-Z  max  wapfika  loyceV   coin-investor   examplens ,

Thank you guys.

[NeuroticFish]

I somehow find it odd you didn't notice that (also unusual to see here culprits being forgiven, so yeah), but hey, the wrongdoing was against you and if you are forgiving him, I will also remove my support  for the flag.

However, call me pessimist, but I would not expect everybody be so eager to do the same.