Why do members switch campaigns always?

[robelneo]

I started doing signature bounty campaigns in 2017 but it's very rare for me to switch campaigns I jump out of the campaign if the project is a scam or questionable, the project paused or stopped or I was replaced the most important for me is the longevity and potential of the campaign.

In the olden days of signature campaigns, you could switch from one campaign to another in the altcoin signature bounty campaign because there are so many campaigns to join but now you can hardly find a good bounty in the altcoin bounty campaign, and on casinos and mixing campaigns the competition is tough you have to prove yourself, if you're an average poster you'll have to wait for your turn and you have to improve and be a quality poster.

There are many reasons why members switch campaigns but the prime reason is the reputation of the campaign, the pay rate is secondary and I guess the number of posts is the consideration.

[1714583082]

1714583082

[1714583082]

1714583082

[1714583082]

1714583082

[Woodie]

My question is why do members move from one campaign to another? I will not mention names of some that I have seen move from campaign to campaign every time there is opening so no one feels am attacking him.

Usually it goes down to trying to get a better pay rate when the opportunity presents itself and just for the record it's not against the rules  !

But back in the day, some managers would not entertain  such users as it meant more work for the campaign manager in recruiting new members whenever an opening is made available..and to avoid such campaign jumpers a soft ban was made to discourage this habit

What makes members move everytime? I need your contribution on this to make me understand it better.

It can be any of the following reasons:

• freedom of which boards one's post will count
• better pay per post obviously
• bonus system for best poster
• likelihood for a campaign to stick around for a long time etc

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I will respond with my personal experience. It's not that members always change campaigns, sometimes we also get kicked out or the campaign ends and you have to make a living. You can be kicked out for poor performance, for example, or for other reasons.

In my case I spent about a year in the Livecasino.io campaign. I was quite happy there but the company decided to cut the budget for the campaign by half, so the managers had to get rid of half of the staff and I was one of them.

From there I moved on to the [banned mixer] campaign, which was paused after a while. Then the vBetFTN campaign started, I applied and I was one of the chosen ones, I was in the campaign for 15 weeks and then I joined [banned mixer] again when it was relaunched.

So we can see that in my recent history, out of 4 campaigns I was in there were 3 changes and only 1 was because I decided to change, in 1 I was made redundant and the other the campaign was paused.

My particular story doesn't have to be what usually happens. As far as I can see the main reason for change is usually economic, but we can't ignore the other causes of change.

So your statement, as categorically as you express it, is false.

[YOSHIE]

What makes members move everytime? I need your contribution on this to make me understand it better.

Basically, campaigns have (Rules and Requirements) that must be carried out and must be fulfilled by every participant employed in the campaign, the motives and reasons vary, depending on the situation and conditions as long as they are able to comply with the provisions set.

The facts on the ground that I have seen are members who move to other campaigns for different reasons.
For example:
* minimum and maximum required posts or certain board sections, is also one of the factors that can influence users to move, other reasons for example: boredom, wanting to find new experiences etc.
* The campaign manager can also be their motive for switching campaigns, whether it's assertiveness, tension, etc., it can also trigger them to switch.
* Payment is also something to consider, but it's only a few percentages.

The point: the campaign manager has a big influence on campaign participants, comfort and calm regarding the actions they take, moving or staying, a high percentage is caused by the campaign manager.

[rachael9385]

Well almost everybody have the same points, and that means what is been said is correct and I believe now you have gotten the reason why people moves from one signature champagne to another.
I believe if you see any signature champagne that pays $300 to $500 per week you will apply and never go out from it unless you see the one that has a bigger pay roll, basically money is what makes people to learn about Bitcoin and other new things because we are already given a chance to take it so is just better for us to make the right choice, thats all.

[Maestro75]

* The campaign manager can also be their motive for switching campaigns, whether it's assertiveness, tension, etc., it can also trigger them to switch.
* Payment is also something to consider, but it's only a few percentages.

The point: the campaign manager has a big influence on campaign participants, comfort and calm regarding the actions they take, moving or staying, a high percentage is caused by the campaign manager.

But some of the members who do this move from one campaign to another also managed by the same manager. How do we judge that? It is clear from the comments I got here that alot of members move because of better payment but the one confusing me is when they do that to another campaign with the same rules and managed by the same member. Sometimes they move and the new campaign they moved to ends while the one they left continues to run.

[LTU_btc]

Lot of things were said already, but I will share my point of view. I understand reasons why other people are jumping between campaigns, but personally, I don't like switching campaigns. For other people higher pay is main factor, but for me extra $10 isn't life changing money. I prefer stability and longevity, usually I spend few years on average in one campaign and I leave it only when campaign ends.
But there is other conditions which may be a factor to switch campaign for some people. Like paying for posts made in local boards or how many posts per week campaign requires.

[examplens]

The answers to the question posed by the OP are very simple, all possible or at least most of the answers have already been written, so I won't repeat myself.

I am more surprised with the frequent changes in the conditions within the campaign, along with the change in the number of participants. Well, for example, it happens that vacancies are opened in a campaign, and after a week there is a restructuring and the participants are removed. I assume that just as managers don't like constant transfers of participants, this other side also wants some long-term stability.
But I guess that's a question for managers

[Maestro75]

I assume that just as managers don't like constant transfers of participants, this other side also wants some long-term stability.
But I guess that's a question for managers

But we can not say managers do not like the constant movement because we often see times where managers accept members who are in their own other campaigns into another of their campaigns. I hope you understand what am trying to say here. If this managers hate it they will not be accepting the same members to cross over, is it not? That is my view of the situation.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

I know alot of us will say it is the difference in weekly reward, that the higher the reward the more people move to campaigns with better payments. But I have seen where members go from better pay rates to the ones with lower rates and lower posts requirements. Some apply to campaign of the same manager in less than a week of getting accepted and they want to move again, the same payment and number of posts. I have also seen those who have refused to move to campaigns with better rates, they will be picked if they applied because of their good posts. They choose to remain. Is it about loyalty? Is it that they are scared of switching? Is it about fulfilment with where they are?

Those people directly involved in this discussion would had been in the best position to give you a direct answer because all we'll be doing here is speculating on what the reasons are without actually knowing the main reason. People can move from one campaign to another campaign for various reasons. Since you have already ruled out the reason of better pay rate lets move on to the managers involved with those campaigns and also the weekdays of the campaign. Some people prefer campaigns that ends during the weekends while others love campaign that ends during the weekdays. As for the managers, people have their favorites and they'll always love to work with them because of their fast payment and on time receiving of payment without having to wait hours before the coins gets to your wallet due to poor network fees or other managerial behaviors.

Some days ago I was surprised to see someone who has stayed in a campaign for more than three years. He was with BestChange. Alot of people can not remain there because there are many campaigns paying higher rates than the campaign he was with but he remained until yesterday that he moved to another campaign. Three years is like a lifetime, both for the campaign running and the member who remained faithful to it.

This particular situation has higher pay reason all over it and there's nothing wrong in that, there's a new campaign that'll pay you more for your contributions on the forum, it's only normal for him to want to partake in such campaign. Getting paid more for the value you bring has a better feeling so there's nothing wrong in anymore moving to experience that feeling. Being in a campaign for so long could be as a result of the piece of mind that the campaign gives you, knowing it's a long lasting campaign and you won't have to bother about applying for a new campaign often. Looking at the Campaigns that have escrow addresses you can easily predict how long the campaign would last and determine if it's worth moving to the campaign or not.

[examplens]

But we can not say managers do not like the constant movement because we often see times where managers accept members who are in their own other campaigns into another of their campaigns. I hope you understand what am trying to say here. If this managers hate it they will not be accepting the same members to cross over, is it not? That is my view of the situation.

I'm almost sure that the managers are not thrilled with the additional work of transferring participants from one campaign to another. Judging by everything so far, stable campaigns with the least fluctuations and changes have the best rating. (for example ex CM or Bestchange).

And maybe the frequent changes and applications for the campaign are considered part of the promotion due to the constant bump through app posts. As I said earlier, managers can give the most precise answer to this.

[yhiaali3]

For me, I would rather work with a less strict manager with lower pay than a strict manager with higher pay.

You cannot get one answer because the answer differs according to the nature and way of thinking of each person. It is like a job in normal life where you try to look for a new job if you do not like your salary or if your manager is strict or the working conditions are not suitable.

In addition, many members have other work in life outside the forum, so they prefer campaigns that have less stringent conditions in order to avoid being pressured.

[bayu7adi]

It can be any of the following reasons:

• freedom of which boards one's post will count

This reasoning makes sense for those who have limited spare time each day, particularly those who work for companies that require them to commute early in the morning and return late in the evening. I believe their time at home is rightfully a period for rest. Thus, it's entirely reasonable for employees to allocate their time primarily to meet the requirements of signature campaigns.

However, the freedom to post on any board of your choice is unrestricted. It's up to you where you want to make your posts within this forum, but it's crucial to adhere to the forum's rules and stay on topic.

I prefer a mindset that values an individual's creativity. So, it doesn't matter where someone posts, and they shouldn't be concerned about whether their posts are counted by campaign managers or not. When they consider the benefit of their contributions, they already possess a higher level of engagement, and the recognition they deserve should naturally follow.

Just demonstrate that we bring value to this forum, and that goodness will eventually come back to us. 

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

1. People change campaign because they noticed a change about the campaign they are which may not be favourable again for them to continue.

2. Some change the campaign they work for because of the payment rate which could have been lower to their expectations or after they discovered a new high paying rate campaign

3. lastly, people change campaigns because they have discovered something new about to come from a newly launched campaign which stands as a major attraction for them to leave where they are to another one, this may be in form of the incentives, bonuses, requirements, rules and the duration at which the new campaign promise to last.

[EarnOnVictor]

You may not notice much since your campaign arrangement is more of an affiliation. People can decide to join a campaign, stay short or longer and leave the high-paying ones for the low-paying ones and vice versa for reasons.

But without mincing words, most people join campaigns for the money and this is evident in how they rush to the highest paying campaigns. But for those who left the high-paying campaign for the lower-paying ones, I could say that it could be two things, either the campaign doesn't align with the value of the person, I do this and I'd avoided applying to some campaigns due to this. The second category might be that the campaign management is making internal adjustments mainly due to money constraints, and at times poor performance of the campaigner. You might not know because some will not announce it publicly but via the PM. The campaigner will not have a choice but to find another one even if they pay less.

But some people are the opposite of this, they might want to taste different campaign sectors (mixing, gambling, exchange etc.) and campaign managers' experiences.

Finally, those who stay in a campaign for long might enjoy the conditions, value and pay, while some might not have the time to be switching campaigns when they didn't tell them to leave.

[aioc]

I remember leaving one campaign because of a reputation issue, Other than that money is not my consideration not even the number of posts I exceed my post quota sometimes, I just want to be in a campaign where the project I'm promoting is reputable the manager managing the campaign is easy to deal with and the campaign has the potential to last long and so far the current campaign I'm in has all the criteria I'm looking for a campaign.
It's a case-to-case basis for every participant and could be money, number of posts, and reputation. but if you're going to switch from one campaign to the other you better be a good poster and someone who can get into the campaign easily.

[Yamane_Keto]

I will add points that may not have been mentioned

1) Campaign manager: There are some sensitivities among members, and we notice that some of them avoid joining the campaign because of its manager or because of the nature of its management. Many do not want a manager who always deletes members or constantly changes the rules.
2) The nature of the project: Some projects force people to be active in certain boards, or prevent certain boards, such as altcoin or local, or the number of posts like Min 10 or Max 25.
3) Project continuity: Joining a project that pays $70 and lasts for several years is better than $100 for two months.

[LoyceMobile]

Recently, I started keeping track of signature changes for selected users. This shows that some of them often switch campaigns.
I think one of the reasons is because the new campaign manager doesn't know about it. "Job hopping" means you're less likely to stick around long in your new job. I'm now thinking I should expand my signature tracking, so that campaign managers can consider this information before accepting someone into a campaign.
When I managed campaigns I always hated it when someone left shortly after being accepted. It's just extra work for the campaign manager.

I've never left a campaign before it ended. How many users can say that?

[PX-Z]

3) Project continuity: Joining a project that pays $70 and lasts for several years is better than $100 for two months.

Yeah, i forgot this one, this is more like a risk to change campaign because of these reason, unless it's stated that the campaign escrow fund is around for 1 month or 2. But usually it only takes 2-3 weeks. That's why i considered it as a risk.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I've never left a campaign before it ended. How many users can say that?

Well, that's easier to do if you've been to the best ones. For those who haven't, and you suddenly get the opportunity to get paid double or more, it doesn't make much sense to stay in the current campaign for supposedly owed loyalty, when you don't know if next week it's going to end, get paused, or you're simplt going to be kicked out. As I commented in my previous post in this thread on the subject:

In my case I spent about a year in the Livecasino.io campaign. I was quite happy there but the company decided to cut the budget for the campaign by half, so the managers had to get rid of half of the staff and I was one of them.