Why do members switch campaigns always?

[LoyceMobile]

I've never left a campaign before it ended. How many users can say that?

Well, that's easier to do if you've been to the best ones.

My first campaign (Rollin) paid a maximum of 50 posts per month, and the pay rate wasn't that high, but I liked the site and stayed with it until it closed.
It helps to be selective which campaign you join.

[1714629935]

1714629935

[1714629935]

1714629935

[1714629935]

1714629935

[1714629935]

1714629935

[1714629935]

1714629935

[Don Pedro Dinero]

My first campaign (Rollin) paid a maximum of 50 posts per month, and the pay rate wasn't that high, but I liked the site and stayed with it until it closed.
It helps to be selective which campaign you join.

You mean if you had the opportunity to switch to one for 50 weekly paid posts for the same payrate or higher you wouldn't have switched? Or that you had that opportunity and didn't do it? I think you would be the only one in the whole forum. The exception that proves the rule, which is that if you get paid more, especially considerably more for spending the same amount of time on the forum, people will switch. As discussed in the thread, there are obviously other factors as well.

By the way, while you're at it you might add that you haven't changed your avatar until the deal has ended. 

[LoyceV]

My first campaign (Rollin) paid a maximum of 50 posts per month, and the pay rate wasn't that high, but I liked the site and stayed with it until it closed.
It helps to be selective which campaign you join.

You mean if you had the opportunity to switch to one for 50 weekly paid posts for the same payrate or higher you wouldn't have switched?

Correct. Back then, my payrate increased significantly after my first signature campaign ended.

Or that you had that opportunity and didn't do it?

I never tried to switch. That doesn't mean I wouldn't do that now if I'd find a better paying deal that I also like, but it has to be something I like.

I think you would be the only one in the whole forum. The exception that proves the rule, which is that if you get paid more, especially considerably more for spending the same amount of time on the forum, people will switch.

There are still people without paid signature.

By the way, while you're at it you might add that you haven't changed your avatar until the deal has ended.  

What can I say, I like this one. I like it so much I wear the same avatar on 3 accounts (Mobile and Bot), while the offer was only for LoyceV.

[coin-investor]

Everyone has their own reasons why they switch campaigns For me after being in so many campaigns since my days in the bounty campaign I prefer stability and reputation more than anything else. My current campaign happens to be the number one casino in the industry and they are one of the longest campaigns in the forum, The payment rate is good and it depends on how active you are.
I hope I can keep up with the campaign, so far Stake is one of the campaigns with the largest number of active participants.
When it comes to joining its important that you consider reputation and stability so many signature campaigns come and go and the competition among posters is very stiff. 

[LoyceMobile]

Everyone has their own reasons why they switch campaigns For me after being in so many campaigns since my days in the bounty campaign I prefer stability and reputation more than anything else. My current campaign happens to be the number one casino in the industry and they are one of the longest campaigns in the forum

It's also one of the worst spam creators.

[Saisher]

Better pay, and the reputation of the project post counts but you can only do this if you're confident enough and you believe that you are a good poster.
The only people who can do this campaign switching are those reputable members of this forum and have a good contribution and trust rating, if you're an average poster better be content to your current campaign or improve the quality of your posts.

[KingsDen]

Why do members switch campaigns always?

Why do people change jobs?

• For a better pay
• For job security

The above two works together and it is hard for someone to choose, especially when loyalty is not attached. Jump to a higher paying campaign that might end next month or remain in your present campaign that may stay till next year.
Other reasons include;

• Number of posts required to be made
• Permitted areas to make post
• The leniency or strictness of the campaign manager
• The promptness of pay  

Among others.

[examplens]

I never tried to switch. That doesn't mean I wouldn't do that now if I'd find a better paying deal that I also like, but it has to be something I like.

Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't your current campaign the fourth this year? In many posts, I recognize certain users more easily by their signatures. I'm not used to your changes, good thing, you didn't change your avatar.

[bakasabo]

I think members also switch campaigns, because they follow specific bounty managers. There are managers who a more strict than others, when we speak about post evaluation, and these managers also have more light or preferable campaign rules. For example some managers allow local posting, some just count few posts. Some members, instead of struggling to post 15 posts in English each week, would rather make 25 posts on their native language.

[LoyceV]

I never tried to switch.

Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't your current campaign the fourth this year? In many posts, I recognize certain users more easily by their signatures. I'm not used to your changes, good thing, you didn't change your avatar.

Nope, it's the third this year and the fourth in total.
I keep track here now. Maybe you saw the redesign.

This is still correct though:

I've never left a campaign before it ended. How many users can say that?

[Maestro75]

For me, I would rather work with a less strict manager with lower pay than a strict manager with higher pay.

What you said is true, I like this point. I never looked at it like that but now you mentioned it I see the reason. I have worked with some managers in the past who will deny you payment because you missed a single post to complete weekly count. But there are some managers that will pass the less post to the following week and pay you complete. It is painful for anyone that a manager can get their payment ceased over small thing like that.

[LTU_btc]

Well, that's easier to do if you've been to the best ones. For those who haven't, and you suddenly get the opportunity to get paid double or more, it doesn't make much sense to stay in the current campaign for supposedly owed loyalty, when you don't know if next week it's going to end, get paused, or you're simplt going to be kicked out. As I commented in my previous post in this thread on the subject:

I've never been in highest paying campaigns like Chipmixer, but I also never left campaign before it ended. I simply don't see reasons to jump between campaigns to get $10/week more. It's not life changing money, especially when I'm in long term stable campaign. It's same like I don't change my full-time job often, I laready work in same company for more than 4 years.
But I understand reasons why people switch between campaigns and your example is very good one. If my current campaign would cut payments by 50%, then most likely I would leave.

[NotATether]

Why do people change jobs?
~

• For job security

I don't think we can classify signature campaigns as a job, because it's a form of advertisement.

I think members also switch campaigns, because they follow specific bounty managers. There are managers who a more strict than others, when we speak about post evaluation, and these managers also have more light or preferable campaign rules. For example some managers allow local posting, some just count few posts. Some members, instead of struggling to post 15 posts in English each week, would rather make 25 posts on their native language.

Why would anyone want to do that, in the middle of a campaign? That is like changing jobs because your supervisor has also changed jobs and went to another company so you just pack your bags and call it quits and move over there - if they even accept you that is.

What you said is true, I like this point. I never looked at it like that but now you mentioned it I see the reason. I have worked with some managers in the past who will deny you payment because you missed a single post to complete weekly count. But there are some managers that will pass the less post to the following week and pay you complete. It is painful for anyone that a manager can get their payment ceased over small thing like that.

That is almost always in the terms of the campaign so it should be clear what you sign up for when you join a campaign.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

This is still correct though:

I've never left a campaign before it ended. How many users can say that?

I don't know if you're speaking in reference to your alt here or your main account but here's my opinion on this if you're speaking as your main account. Not everyone has the same privileges you have on the forum and don't get me wrong (you deserve them all) but you're unlikely to be kick out of a campaign unlike other members on the forum. People are looking for security in campaigns, that's campaign that won't kick them out just because they don't have the reputation like you do. People switch campaign for various reasons and one of them is to work with a manager that's less likely to replace them with others that are of higher reputation. Also you're privilege to be in one of the best paying campaigns (frequently) and also have side deals that are worth more than some campaigns are paying that many accounts can never have on the forum. You should be comfortable in any campaign you're participating in and don't have a reason to switch.

I think members also switch campaigns, because they follow specific bounty managers. There are managers who a more strict than others, when we speak about post evaluation, and these managers also have more light or preferable campaign rules. For example some managers allow local posting, some just count few posts. Some members, instead of struggling to post 15 posts in English each week, would rather make 25 posts on their native language.

One rule I highlighted in my thread: [Guide] Factors to consider before joining paid signature campaigns. is that we should always work for a campaign that won't change our posting habits and even when they're the only options available on the forum, we should avoid them and keep participating in discussion on the forum. You don't need to be in a campaign to write on the forum and you shouldn't join any that you won't be comfortable in. Signature campaign aren't jobs that you can justify being in for the salary to keep life moving until you find another more suiting to you. So in this scenario instead of participating in a campaign that won't allow you to post in your local baord, ignored them and wait for those that'll allow you be you.

[Z-tight]

I have worked with some managers in the past who will deny you payment because you missed a single post to complete weekly count.

I can understand what the managers are thinking and why they do that, since it is a campaign with an exact post per week requirement, and not a pay per post, the managers will be expecting participants to do more than the bare mimimum. Let's say the campaign requires you to make 20 posts to get paid, the manager may expect 23+ posts, in that way if you have a post deleted or moved to a section that's not counted towards the payment, you'll still get the full payment.

For the participant, it could be as a result of a busy or rough week in real life, but you can't blame the manager if you didn't reach the exact requirement. Communication is also important between managers and campaign participants, if you are having a rough time in real life, you can discuss with your manager and the both of you will reach a good compromise.

[Findingnemo]

I switched only once if my memory serves right in all the years, I like to be in the long-running campaign no matter if their pay rate is half compared to some campaigns that popped up recently but I can only speak for myself and based on the opinions shared by others the probable cause is the high pay rate.

But if I am not wrong campaign managers don't like the attitude of switching campaigns too often, and some managers explicitly stated that on a few occasions.

Even I saw members applying for a campaign just after thanking them for accepting a signature campaign.

[Note3]

What makes members move everytime? I need your contribution on this to make me understand it better.

To get a better payment of course.
Not all members on this forum often switch signature campaigns there are those who stay on the campaign for a very long period of time, although he has a chance of getting a higher payment, the reason may be to get a signature campaign that lasts longer than just one to two weeks.
There are members who make signature campaigns as their main income, and these members will certainly prefer long-running campaigns even though the payment is not large especially if the value is sufficient to finance their lives, certainty is more important.

[anntlevel]

I remember leaving one campaign because of a reputation issue, Other than that money is not my consideration not even the number of posts I exceed my post quota sometimes, I just want to be in a campaign where the project I'm promoting is reputable the manager managing the campaign is easy to deal with and the campaign has the potential to last long and so far the current campaign I'm in has all the criteria I'm looking for a campaign.
It's a case-to-case basis for every participant and could be money, number of posts, and reputation. but if you're going to switch from one campaign to the other you better be a good poster and someone who can get into the campaign easily.

I thought money is not your consideration, so why you are making sure that your post exceeds to your quota? The logic behind is because some threads or replies can get deleted and if we only post 25 per week (most sig campaigns minimum) we can get short and we may not get paid. You also ensure that you are in a reputable campaign manager so that you can always get paid.

Lastly, you want a long lasting campaign so that you can continuously earn a crypto. I believe that this is also the dream of many campaign participant because sometimes a new campaign can come rarely and then applying on it is also not easy. We always need to be on time to have a better chance of being accepted.

[Z-tight]

I thought money is not your consideration, so why you are making sure that your post exceeds to your quota? The logic behind is because some threads or replies can get deleted and if we only post 25 per week (most sig campaigns minimum) we can get short and we may not get paid.

The logic is not always constant, and making posts above the maximum that will be paid for doesn't mean you are doing it to ensure you get paid. Some users find making posts easy, as long as they find topics that interests them and this way they'll make so many posts above what's counted towards the weekly payment. You could also be making a few extra posts to ensure deleted or posts moved to sections that don't count in the campaign doesn't affect your payment. In my honest opinion, it does not matter what the logic is, so long as the posts are good and aren't spam posts.

We always need to be on time to have a better chance of being accepted.

When you apply for a campaign doesn't matter, just don't apply when it is CFNP. Good managers will check all of the applications and take their time to review all of them, even if your application was the last one.

[Coin_trader]

I remember leaving one campaign because of a reputation issue, Other than that money is not my consideration not even the number of posts I exceed my post quota sometimes, I just want to be in a campaign where the project I'm promoting is reputable the manager managing the campaign is easy to deal with and the campaign has the potential to last long and so far the current campaign I'm in has all the criteria I'm looking for a campaign.
It's a case-to-case basis for every participant and could be money, number of posts, and reputation. but if you're going to switch from one campaign to the other you better be a good poster and someone who can get into the campaign easily.

I thought money is not your consideration, so why you are making sure that your post exceeds to your quota? The logic behind is because some threads or replies can get deleted and if we only post 25 per week (most sig campaigns minimum) we can get short and we may not get paid. You also ensure that you are in a reputable campaign manager so that you can always get paid.

Lastly, you want a long lasting campaign so that you can continuously earn a crypto. I believe that this is also the dream of many campaign participant because sometimes a new campaign can come rarely and then applying on it is also not easy. We always need to be on time to have a better chance of being accepted.

Obviously he wants to get paid since he is enrolled on a campaign. The topic here is the discussion about changing campaign frequently and there’s nothing wrong to secured the amount of post needed for the campaign to be paid since this is a job not a volunteer work.

I believe he meant money is not a problem by means of the salary difference between each campaign. It’s hypocracy to the highest level to say that someone doesn’t need money while enrolled in a campaign and posting until max wuota no matter how good his contribution. We are all after extra income that’s why we join on a campaign. On his case, he doesn’t mean like that.