✨ Shuffle.com | The next generation of crypto casinos | Sports, Casino + token

[dzungmobile]

I don't have any experience so being a social media manager is a difficult task for those without skills. I think being a social media manager must be good at creating attractive images in some promotions that are held.

Will there be an interview after the process of being accepted as a social media manager? What I mean in the google zoom video interview?
Or will they only accept based on the skills and criteria in the CV?

You can get basics of the job there https://shuffle.jobs/31434

There is no information on how they will do with best applicants from applications they receive. Reading the job's rules and other information, will help you preparing your CV better and increase your chance to be selected in final list of candidates for the job.

I am quite sure that there will be interviews on most promising applicants before Shuffle team selecting who will be a chosen staff for this role, Shuffle Social Media Manager.

Shuffle team can post this job on different websites for cryptocurrency jobs to increase applicants they receive and maximize their chances of getting a best one.
Cryptocurrency Job List

[o48o]

It's more risky than purchasing bitcoin or SHFL token directly. Mining bitcoin or wagering to get SHFL token contains many uncertain things while with direct purchase, it's more simpler and less risk too.

For sure, that's why i do it. It's just cheaper and saves me time. But i definitely don't see that as a "best" option, because there are reasons for people choosing otherwise.

In both your examples (bitcoin mining and wagering), miners and wagers are supporting platform they believe in. Wagers support the platform by giving it more activity / volume, and bitcoin miners are participating to make the chain more secure. It's not all about number tokens or mined bitcoin for everyone, but about support. And in both cases users get rewarded for that, just like shfl stakers will be rewarded later on with free raffle tickets.

[Wind_FURY]

It's more risky than purchasing bitcoin or SHFL token directly. Mining bitcoin or wagering to get SHFL token contains many uncertain things while with direct purchase, it's more simpler and less risk too.

For sure, that's why i do it. It's just cheaper and saves me time. But i definitely don't see that as a "best" option, because there are reasons for people choosing otherwise.

It's currently "cheaper" to buy because of the very low price.

It won't be "cheap" to buy during a surging bull market, when everything is going to their all time highs. It will probably better to get it for free as part of your bonus/cashback from the Shuffle casino.

In both your examples (bitcoin mining and wagering), miners and wagers are supporting platform they believe in. Wagers support the platform by giving it more activity / volume, and bitcoin miners are participating to make the chain more secure. It's not all about number tokens or mined bitcoin for everyone, but about support. And in both cases users get rewarded for that, just like shfl stakers will be rewarded later on with free raffle tickets.

Ser, in Bitcoin mining, it's ALL about the incentives. That's the main reason why the network is sticking together - because if its incentive structure.

[panjul07]

It's more risky than purchasing bitcoin or SHFL token directly. Mining bitcoin or wagering to get SHFL token contains many uncertain things while with direct purchase, it's more simpler and less risk too.

For sure, that's why i do it. It's just cheaper and saves me time. But i definitely don't see that as a "best" option, because there are reasons for people choosing otherwise.

When it comes to "the best", I have to say that it is depending on our own preferences so something best should be subjective and you are the one who can decide which one is the best for yourself.
In this case the best for you is by buying it directly because you think it is easier and cheaper but for others (lets say me), the best is by wagering because I do like gambling.
But it does not mean that I wont buy at all and on the other side, those who prefer to buy it directly does not mean that they will not earn it by playing.
As simple as that, the most important thing to have in mind is that we should always spend our money wisely and responsibly both to buy it directly or to gamble.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

In a simple way, there are some investors & gamblers.
Investor not gambling: they're more prefer getting the token by buying the token, rather than gambling while can losing their money
Gambler not investing: they're more prefer getting the token by wagering rather than buying from the market, cause there has some chance win too.

We are in a gambling board, of course people will "SHILL" more with wagering rather than buying from the market. The discussion will be different, If the discussion on Speculation - Altcoin. For people who think which one the best, both are the best because they doing their parts.

[avp2306]

For sure, that's why i do it. It's just cheaper and saves me time. But i definitely don't see that as a "best" option, because there are reasons for people choosing otherwise.

When it comes to "the best", I have to say that it is depending on our own preferences so something best should be subjective and you are the one who can decide which one is the best for yourself.
In this case the best for you is by buying it directly because you think it is easier and cheaper but for others (lets say me), the best is by wagering because I do like gambling.
But it does not mean that I wont buy at all and on the other side, those who prefer to buy it directly does not mean that they will not earn it by playing.
As simple as that, the most important thing to have in mind is that we should always spend our money wisely and responsibly both to buy it directly or to gamble.

Exactly there that discussion doesn't have correct answer since every points given is valid. We have different intentions towards in this option and not everyone would have the same opinion towards what they like. In my case I'm split into half since sometimes I'm lazy for reaching the requirements since my mood change so fast. There are times that I easily got bored then choose different casino to seek something fun especially to discuss interesting matters especially if there community is active.

Some choose to buy since there are times people think about they are wasting their time and money for doing that. Then want to shortcut things since they know that this token is good and want to add up in their portfolio without wasting some minutes or hours in their life. But majority who goes here gamble and don't prioritize what they can get from Shuffle since their main intention is either to win or have fun, those airdrops is just a bonus.

[efialtis]

I had a huge win recently on Shuffle and they processed my withdrawal within minutes... thumbs up!

Check it out here: https://www.btcgosu.com/win-images/hand-of-anubis-86619-00-win-on-shuffle/

[Mahdirakib]

Good news for players who are actively wagering at Shuffle because the prizepool for the weekly race is increased 5x, it is now $100,000 while it was $20,000 before.

It would have been better to run daily race with small prizepool instead of the weekly race with $100k. Moreover, they share the prizes to the top 20 users only. Where the top 5 players receive 83% of the prizepool amount. Shuffle wagering contest is only for the big whale.

~snip~

Congrats for your huge win. Your bonus buy amount was big too.

[panjul07]

Good news for players who are actively wagering at Shuffle because the prizepool for the weekly race is increased 5x, it is now $100,000 while it was $20,000 before.

It would have been better to run daily race with small prizepool instead of the weekly race with $100k. Moreover, they share the prizes to the top 20 users only. Where the top 5 players receive 83% of the prizepool amount. Shuffle wagering contest is only for the big whale.

I am not trying to defend them because I'm a member of their signature campaign, as far as I can see is that Shuffle is improving regularly.
They add many new things in the site (especially promotions) since they were announced here almost a year ago.
I have to agree with your opinion about the wagering contest and maybe they need to have more winners for the weekly race.
Hopefully they will hear it and make an upgrade for the wagering contest, maybe 50 winners weekly would be more interesting.

[AbuBhakar]

I am not trying to defend them because I'm a member of their signature campaign, as far as I can see is that Shuffle is improving regularly.
They add many new things in the site (especially promotions) since they were announced here almost a year ago.
I have to agree with your opinion about the wagering contest and maybe they need to have more winners for the weekly race.
Hopefully they will hear it and make an upgrade for the wagering contest, maybe 50 winners weekly would be more interesting.

Top 20 players to receive rewards is almost good already if they will change the distribution percentage as suggested by the above post. That 83% for top 5 is overkill which doesn’t give much room for rewards for low rank players.

Top 50 or top 100 is much better because I saw some casino that offer top 100 winners while low ranks received a combination of small cash and free spins. The current rewards of 100K will be good if split to more users to encourage everyone to wager even for just a the lowest spot because it’s achievable.

[avp2306]

I am not trying to defend them because I'm a member of their signature campaign, as far as I can see is that Shuffle is improving regularly.
They add many new things in the site (especially promotions) since they were announced here almost a year ago.
I have to agree with your opinion about the wagering contest and maybe they need to have more winners for the weekly race.
Hopefully they will hear it and make an upgrade for the wagering contest, maybe 50 winners weekly would be more interesting.

Top 20 players to receive rewards is almost good already if they will change the distribution percentage as suggested by the above post. That 83% for top 5 is overkill which doesn’t give much room for rewards for low rank players.

Top 50 or top 100 is much better because I saw some casino that offer top 100 winners while low ranks received a combination of small cash and free spins. The current rewards of 100K will be good if split to more users to encourage everyone to wager even for just a the lowest spot because it’s achievable.

It somehow give motivation for players to be competitive and reach at that top spot, But somehow could kill the interest of casual players since they might think that automatically they can't qualify know that they only gamble depends on their mood and don't use huge money to gamble.

Although its good to lower down at what you suggest but maybe they don't need to do it now.

Maybe they want people to became more competitive since more money spend is more revenue to came into their casino.

[AbuBhakar]

I am not trying to defend them because I'm a member of their signature campaign, as far as I can see is that Shuffle is improving regularly.
They add many new things in the site (especially promotions) since they were announced here almost a year ago.
I have to agree with your opinion about the wagering contest and maybe they need to have more winners for the weekly race.
Hopefully they will hear it and make an upgrade for the wagering contest, maybe 50 winners weekly would be more interesting.

Top 20 players to receive rewards is almost good already if they will change the distribution percentage as suggested by the above post. That 83% for top 5 is overkill which doesn’t give much room for rewards for low rank players.

Top 50 or top 100 is much better because I saw some casino that offer top 100 winners while low ranks received a combination of small cash and free spins. The current rewards of 100K will be good if split to more users to encourage everyone to wager even for just a the lowest spot because it’s achievable.

It somehow give motivation for players to be competitive and reach at that top spot, But somehow could kill the interest of casual players since they might think that automatically they can't qualify know that they only gamble depends on their mood and don't use huge money to gamble.

Although its good to lower down at what you suggest but maybe they don't need to do it now.

Maybe they want people to became more competitive since more money spend is more revenue to came into their casino.

The problem on this kind of competition is few whales can dominate over and over the weekly tournaments while the casual players will still play the same slow phase unlike when the casino make the tournament open even for low bankroll because it can increase competition even in lower level that will result to more traffic in the casino at the same time due to casual players can become active players often due to competition.

But this still up to the Metawin management to decide whether they will adjust it since they are open for revamping their tournament according to players interest.

[o48o]

Good news for players who are actively wagering at Shuffle because the prizepool for the weekly race is increased 5x, it is now $100,000 while it was $20,000 before.

It would have been better to run daily race with small prizepool instead of the weekly race with $100k. Moreover, they share the prizes to the top 20 users only. Where the top 5 players receive 83% of the prizepool amount. Shuffle wagering contest is only for the big whale.

Definitely. I don't get their thinking, as otherwise their plans seems to make sense. Attracting whales is easy to understand, but it's very short sighted not giving any changes to others. I am thinking that they might not have any logarithmic distribution model for shfl either, but they are rewards will be linear to spend money. Meaning that whales have even bigger impact to shfl supply from the start than i though.

But this is probably one of the reasons they are trying to hire new marketing lead and CRM management next to that social media manager.

[Mahdirakib]

I have to agree with your opinion about the wagering contest and maybe they need to have more winners for the weekly race.
Hopefully they will hear it and make an upgrade for the wagering contest, maybe 50 winners weekly would be more interesting.

Our discussion doesn't contain anything to defend. Shuffle has indeed improved a lot and they are giving back a good amount to the users through bonuses, promotions and contests. But it is all about how they are distributing the amount. Stake runs daily wagering contest with the same prize pool, and they distribute the prizes to top 5k users. Where Shuffle is only providing the prize to the top 20 users. Which makes a big difference there. $100k prize pool need to be shared with 100 people at least.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Perhaps different casinos different result they can receive?

"Stake" have more user than "Shufle" mikro gamble compared to high roller gambler based on the revenue stake, "mikro" gambler could give them a good revenue. So, they decide to spread more meanwhile for "SHUFFLE" they kinda new in the casino. They could be relly on high roller gambler and need to babysit them for a while, the change is the first time so basically the good things they make some change.

Perhaps in the future, they spread more position ? must agree top 20 was a little bit less, but perhaps try to make suggestion for next 2-3 montha after at least they receive some data based on the race they're make.

[Learn Bitcoin]

I had a huge win recently on Shuffle and they processed my withdrawal within minutes... thumbs up!

Check it out here: https://www.btcgosu.com/win-images/hand-of-anubis-86619-00-win-on-shuffle/

I just watched the replay of your big win, and it was an insane big win. I can imagine how you were feeling when you played those free spins and won. People fear not getting paid by online casinos because casinos usually take a long time to check the legitimacy of the winnings. I'm glad to know that your winnings were paid within a couple of minutes, which is great. Casinos that are honest will grow their business over time, and Shuffle will be one of them if they continue.

The Shuffle team and signature participants should know that the Campaign Manager Little Mouse is out of contact. I have created a thread in the reputation section about it, which you should check Little Mouse is out of contact

[Taskford]

I have to agree with your opinion about the wagering contest and maybe they need to have more winners for the weekly race.
Hopefully they will hear it and make an upgrade for the wagering contest, maybe 50 winners weekly would be more interesting.

Our discussion doesn't contain anything to defend. Shuffle has indeed improved a lot and they are giving back a good amount to the users through bonuses, promotions and contests. But it is all about how they are distributing the amount. Stake runs daily wagering contest with the same prize pool, and they distribute the prizes to top 5k users. Where Shuffle is only providing the prize to the top 20 users. Which makes a big difference there. $100k prize pool need to be shared with 100 people at least.

People need to think that Stake is old casino and have more bigger budget while Shuffle is new and trying to create a mark or reputation in gambling industry, So far they are doing good and we could able to see that people who gamble on both casino is happy with their experiences in these casinos. What I think its not good to compare them since both is doing good in these business.

For prizes its expected that stake have more bigger reward to distribute to a lot of people since they are a huge casino. While Shuffle is just doing nice promotion which their existing gambler is also happy with what these casino could offer to them. But if Shuffle will work hard and market their casino well then no question that they have potential to became a big successful casino. Only time will tell especially if they are consistent on everything they do.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Yaps, that's the points.

Nothing wrong in both opinion everyone is good, just need time to give them the result. Most of new casino will be always rely on high roller, they need to babysit them until the bankroll is growing too. Casino business is kinda competitive we seeing to much online casino, finally can't keep up with the market and closed under 1 years. Hopefully they got a good result too.

I also, trying to looking some casino might be "SHUFFLE" is my new one too.

[Haunebu]

People fear not getting paid by online casinos because casinos usually take a long time to check the legitimacy of the winnings. I'm glad to know that your winnings were paid within a couple of minutes, which is great. Casinos that are honest will grow their business over time, and Shuffle will be one of them if they continue.

Agreed! Shuffle has always been a great site and its reputation keeps improving thanks to stuff like this. It's far better than some other sites who delay such big payments using various excuses.

The Shuffle team and signature participants should know that the Campaign Manager Little Mouse is out of contact. I have created a thread in the reputation section about it, which you should check Little Mouse is out of contact

Damn! Was not aware of this. Just checked that thread out and I hope LM is fine and safe wherever he is.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

People fear not getting paid by online casinos because casinos usually take a long time to check the legitimacy of the winnings. I'm glad to know that your winnings were paid within a couple of minutes, which is great. Casinos that are honest will grow their business over time, and Shuffle will be one of them if they continue.

Agreed! Shuffle has always been a great site and its reputation keeps improving thanks to stuff like this. It's far better than some other sites who delay such big payments using various excuses.

Well, no wonder why shuffle was mentioned a lot but all the unhappy stk players that vowed to leave and switch. Many mentioned shuffle as their new destination after the recent unhappy "2nd monthly" shenanigans happening this week.
I actually wonder if an arrival of a batch of new players was actually felt by shuffle management or if they were just talking and didn't actually follow through on what they said.