🔥No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 100$ BTC GIVEAWAY🎲

[Taskford]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

Any casino or gambling platforms that indicates no kyc should then not require it because it has already been stayed, but we also have to confirm this by reading it on their ToS if it also reflected, some may not talked about no kyc requirements and yet still make demands on that later, lastly, we have to understand the context that no kyc is being stated, some may refer to this that kyc is not required to create an account, this doesn't mean that they are not a kyc gambling platform, they will still request for kyc after your registration, except they specifically noted that they are entirely a no KYC casino.

They made their name as No KYC casino so people could assume that this will never be ask at any cost since that's what they market to us here. It would be crazy if later on they ask this since for this since maybe many would feel that they are been deceive since asking this when withdrawal request happen is somehow can be consider as shady action done by them or other casino. KYC is controversial topic and there are some new casino owners take advantage on situation and we know how it end up from some people believe on the words they say.  Maybe for new casino they should be honest regarding on KYC since at current situation where regulation implemented on some casinos for sure this will be ask especially if they ask to get some licenses to make their casino legitimate to people looking at it and also to government regulating some financial platforms.

We know that crypto people would really be always prefer on having that no kyc platform but since this platforms or business does involved huge money then expect that regulations would really be next in line.
Also there are really people who do really mind about having license because they do really see it as a proof about sites legitimacy which we know that it is a common approach but we know that licenses cant really assure out 100% security if funds are really that taken or been ran away specially here on crypto space but somehow it does have a better security compared into those who do ran off a fully anonymous platform which it does really have its cons when it comes to users funds been stored up on the said platform . This is why some people would really be preferring about being regulated or centralized rather than being not.
Making out with those false claims specially on start up is really not something that good because once people or the community would really be having that kind of impression that been mold up
then sooner or later your platform or company would really be leaving no people been playing around because of the thing you had done earlier. When trust been broken then its not
something that could be taken it back.

At first being anonymous to anyone has been introduce by crypto on any platforms but since this industry became big and crypto platforms need to follow the government order regarding on regulation then those reputable platform would really implement this KYC submission. Although there are other may don't like this but for the sake of being regulated by the law they should comply to the requirements asked. That's why its up to us to at least check the reputation of the casino so that we will not put at risk ourselves to any random or new platform asking this KYC requirements. Also we need to check if those casino claiming that they will not require KYC is really not implementing that, since for sure we might get a serious problem if the casino is just fooling us by using that word.

[Dunamisx]

        I think the other casinos mentioned seem to require KYC. Well, it seems that not all of them are legitimate without KYC; maybe at the beginning of the registration they don't have KYC, but later it is possible that the casino platform will demand KYC from their gamblers.

If a casino is not requesting for kyc is not the conclusion that they will not make such demands later as long as they are not a no KYC casino, sometimes they make it appears more easy for their users to only have better experience to sign in their portal for registration without requesting them of any thing of such, but if we think on our own self that we don't really want a KYC casino, then we shouldn't use anyone of such and look after the ones that are not KYC casinos

        So further research is still needed to identify if it is true that the platform mentioned is 100% no-kyc. And there's nothing wrong with investigating and learning to read the TOS of each casino you'll be playing at first.

That's true, how often do we make research on these gambling platforms to know their category they belong if kyc or no kyc casino.

[goldkingcoiner]

It's such a pain, isn’t it? Every casino, in my opinion, should be completely transparent about their KYC. It's unfair to keep players in the dark and then reveal the information when they try to make a withdrawal. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I see such practices.

It's a bad practice and is harmful for a casino reputation. They must have term in their Terms of Service for KYC, is it mandatory, is it additional requirement only when something is detected by the casino. The second term is vague and if a casino has it in their Terms of Service, I have to ask my self that do I agree to do KYC? If I am ready to do this, I would prefer to do this after registering my account and don't wait for a KYC card pulling by the casino to submit KYC documents.

I agree with you that it's best to take care of the KYC stuff up front. This way, I don't have any surprises later on. I understand the inconvenience, but the benefits to my sanity are well worth it. I think it's critical that we, as players, insist on honesty and fair play from online casino

I agree with you too and want to do the same. I only deposit money after I successfully KYC and I am sure that I will not have issue with KYC later.

If you do not do the KYC upfront then you have only yourself to blame.

We already know every online gambling casinos attitude towards KYC. Sooner or later everyone will have to undergo it and then there could be bad surprises ahead. Before anyone even thinks of depositing money on a casino wallet, they should definitely first make sure their KYC procedure is complete and green lighted by the casino. That way, you also have the reassurance that there will not be any problems concerning KYC in the future.

Seems most logical to me, even though personally, I hate the concept of KYC. I do not feel safe giving strangers my government-issued documents.

[delfastTions]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

I think that potentially, businessmen who organize a casino and the operation of this casino in practice always know very well that they will definitely carry out identity verification checks according to the KYC procedure.  And in order to preserve their business, they will also be required to constantly monitor the flow of cryptocurrency by introducing mandatory verification using AML. 
however, such casino managers often instruct marketing services not to indicate too clearly and openly that the player will have to undergo KYC, and even more so if he wins.  This question can be formulated and stated in such a way, for example, even in the ToS, that the player will think that he can safely play in this casino and no one will   want to know his identity and he will calmly receive his winnings without any KYC.  And of course, advertising such as the absence of KYC works great and the number of players in such a casino is growing.  But at some moment, completely unexpected for you, the support of such a casino will inform you that they are forced to carry out KYC right now, because this is a legal requirement.  But supposedly just yesterday it was possible without KYC.  This is of course an outright lie. 
So you should always take into account that when playing in a casino, if you win, you will still have to provide your verification data.

Usually, the casinos, especially the new ones will try to implement such promotions whereby they can gather more customer's and No KYC is one card that get most attraction.
When you tell someone that you can gamble without KYC, he / she will get immediately attracted to it.  That is why we find new casino having this "No KYC" label.

However, it is seem often that as long as you are depositing, playing and losing at these casino, you are good to go but if you win anything big and try to withdraw, then suddenly all the legalizations and complications come into play and you will find your account freeze or close. That is a reason No KYC casino are mostly risky to play.

Severral years ago, when there were no KYC procedures at all in payments using cryptocurrency and  the principle of anonymity for the ownership of cryptocurrencies was generally observed, which is actually the fundamental principle of the entire invention of Satoshi Nakamoto, it was fashionable to play quite confidently in a casino that declared “No KYC”.  Now this slogan really does not mean at all that under no circumstances will the casino administration require you to verify your identity.  Rather, on the contrary, under various pretexts, in the eve nt of a big win, you will have to provide your personal data even to a casino that promised “NO KYC”.  Well, the legislation of many states now requires everyone who pays money to ordinary people, in this case, gamblers, to provide personal information about who respectively receives this money.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip~

I think something, always when things are transparent things should be done like a casino apart from reading the Tos, which is something annoying and slow, because it is an imperative duty, these things should not be left lightly, we as well Players must set an example, now having said this, 'for me one thing is certain, every time we enter a casino we always check what the KYC is like, there is no other way but to see what it is about, first because things They must be made from a casino and taken into consideration, I have taken as a forecast that if I am interested in a casino, I would prefer to do the KYC first, and see to what extent that KYC helps me to make a withdrawal, because as they have said, the casinos have different levels of KYC, I imagine it is a couple of minutes, so for me this should go as the first option before making any deposit, but I have already taken that option if I am really interested in a casino, because then going through the terrible moment that sometimes At the time of withdrawal, do they ask me for a KYC? It is something that I would not like to happen, however I am one of the people who accept that the new regulations ask or require KYC, I was reading somewhere that there are casinos that sometimes do not say it at once, but that each KYC is done as an additional condition, or a very hidden term there, then it doesn't seem fair to me.

Each casino has its own style, so when there are these types of things that are so flashy and so delicate, I have read in the forum in many threads where there are many users who feel deceived, because they are usually told in the casinos at the time of register that they do not need KYC, but at the time of withdrawal if they require it, then they are told that only some users require KYC, it is like politics, something like that, then when things are widely demonstrated that it is necessary a KYC, false advertising is not good, because later it is much more difficult to do it.

It's such a pain, isn’t it? Every casino, in my opinion, should be completely transparent about their KYC. It's unfair to keep players in the dark and then reveal the information when they try to make a withdrawal. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I see such practices. I agree with you that it's best to take care of the KYC stuff up front. This way, I don't have any surprises later on. I understand the inconvenience, but the benefits to my sanity are well worth it. I think it's critical that we, as players, insist on honesty and fair play from online casino

The KYC process will always be annoying from the beginning or any other time. 'but I think that to make it smoother, without any type of adjustments and improve from the beginning, of course, this for the casinos that we have previously put as the best for that, without emago I am one of those who think that when it's time Doing a KYC should be done with the maximum number of documents we have, because it is not known when we have to make a withdrawal of any type, it is better to do it with the greatest number of coupons, if you win big then you can withdraw big , we can never stop thinking about the good possibilities, we are notorious players who at any time can count on a good touch of luck and that can make the difference, and I only recommend doing the KYC for our favorite sites, not for everyone because for Not all of them are worth it , because we do not know the scope of them It is to make the entire process better.

When we are in a casino we must know how to choose the best one so that it adapts to our taste. I have always said that the Best casinos are the old ones because they have gone through processes that are quite large, trustworthy, have a high reputation and have a lot of knowledge about The players , of course that includes the processes that are quite strong, have already overcome some risks of being hacked and all that weighs, because I am not going to trust a new casino, where I don't even know what the limits of their security are and how good they are with the custody of the funds , because very well there could be a new casino and then they hack it and they say that it was not their fault and that Everything was stolen from them , since they do not have the capacity to answer for the stolen funds, since it is something that they They can argue , then in that order of ideas things can go like this, and what happens ? who is blamed ? They can have all the funds , and Things can Still go to nothing.

[NoToKYC]

There have been added a few new casinos, more other crypto sites for earning crypto or booking of trips paying via Crypto and also another exclusive bonus

[NoToKYC]

A new tutorial was published: how to earn crypto

[delfastTions]

The KYC process will always be annoying from the beginning or any other time.
~~~~~~

That's it for sure! 
The fact of the matter is that when you are required to undergo the KYC procedure, it is always annoying and it always takes time, and often all sorts of nuances arise with this very check.  Just look at all the searching around the house or in your pockets for the necessary documents, then these stupid photographs with dates written on a piece of paper, or with documents next to your face.  All this is quite disgusting and humiliating for any normal person.  So I am not a supporter of such advance verification under the KYC procedure..  If there is at least some opportunity to avoid it, then you should do it and not waste time on all this nonsense.  And in general, it’s disgusting that all these KYC requirements when using crypto-currency payments are being imposed by casinos more and more and, accordingly, regulators in an increasing number of countries are introducing such rules. 

This will simply spoil and disavow the very meaning of anonymous payments, for which cryptocurrencies were invented.

[LUCKMCFLY]

The KYC process will always be annoying from the beginning or any other time.
~~~~~~

That's it for sure! 
The fact of the matter is that when you are required to undergo the KYC procedure, it is always annoying and it always takes time, and often all sorts of nuances arise with this very check.  Just look at all the searching around the house or in your pockets for the necessary documents, then these stupid photographs with dates written on a piece of paper, or with documents next to your face.  All this is quite disgusting and humiliating for any normal person.  So I am not a supporter of such advance verification under the KYC procedure..  If there is at least some opportunity to avoid it, then you should do it and not waste time on all this nonsense.  And in general, it’s disgusting that all these KYC requirements when using crypto-currency payments are being imposed by casinos more and more and, accordingly, regulators in an increasing number of countries are introducing such rules. 

This will simply spoil and disavow the very meaning of anonymous payments, for which cryptocurrencies were invented.

Yes, you are right, in fact when it comes to how to have a better Sense of things without KYC as it was a few years ago, things worked much better, people did their Business in the casinos , they played calmly and did not There was no type of proof that could be associated with people , in fact I am one of those who think that even the casinos had more Players , because Now with the KYC thing they could have fired many to not Comply with this requirement that is below normal, where they should never ask for it under any type of criteria, of course when we make a small sketch of the cases, that some casinos steal them, and that many of those who promote KYC say and notice that things must be like this because in a case of robbery from a casino, they help them recover the sperosans funds, that is the vikl and vulgar lie that you can tell, it is like that Which is asked so that others can generate more possibilities than the people join the KYC and that it is something safe, or that they look at it so that it is something safe, in fact there are players who believe it, which at least makes no sense, because only the person's money is enough to that they return the Gifts they have designated there, then these things cannot be Considered a matter of atracting Players and people.

If people want to believe that KYC is for greater security or something like that, you cannot be so ignorant and naive in life, because life will cost you more , it is Something that Cannot happen because ignoring things as they are becomes a problem. In the worst mistake that we can make, and that is something that at the end of the day includes money, and the money does not want to say or they are going to recover, if there is a hack or something like that, that money is the Same if it does not have enough money, Well, they lose it and that is something that has to be seen as Equal.

[mirakal]

If people want to believe that KYC is for greater security or something like that, you cannot be so ignorant and naive in life, ...

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

Now, let's consider the scenario where a site is not regulated, and users are anonymous. If, unfortunately, there's an inside job, and the regulators find out that the owners stole users' funds, there could be serious consequences. In such cases, the regulators might investigate and, if necessary, shut down the casino. They would then work to distribute any remaining balances to the users.

However, the distribution of funds will likely involve a legal process. It's highly improbable that these funds would be sent to unknown accounts. Regulators would typically have reporting obligations and a proper framework for returning the funds to their rightful owners. But, as you rightly pointed out, the risk lies in unregulated platforms. If they are seized by authorities, the process could be less transparent and the funds might end up in government treasuries as unclaimed funds.

[348Judah]

Base on what the people want, there's more bids for a no KYC casino than the ones requesting for such, many have now realized that they needed time to make this discovery in other to save them from future surprises with KYC issues, maybe we should also assume that a few numbers of gamblers aren't aware of it that kyc is something they needed to tackle right from the beginning, if you can't go by providing the required informations, then abstain from using a kyc gambling casino and for the ones that doesn't support for the use of kyc.

[dwyane36]

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

As for me, the main problem with the KYC requirements both at gambling sites and centralized exchanges is that it is not known how exactly and for what purpose the personal data of users are used. I mean that if you give your personal data to any company, you shouldn't be surprised that your data can be stolen and used by malicious people at any time. Unfortunately, there have been many such cases in the crypto industry.

[mirakal]

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

As for me, the main problem with the KYC requirements both at gambling sites and centralized exchanges is that it is not known how exactly and for what purpose the personal data of users are used. I mean that if you give your personal data to any company, you shouldn't be surprised that your data can be stolen and used by malicious people at any time. Unfortunately, there have been many such cases in the crypto industry.

That's a concern for many gamblers. But the question is, can we avoid the KYC requirement when it's mandated by the regulators for gambling sites? It seems like we have no choice here. The options are clear: either the gambling site implements the KYC policy and continues to operate, or they choose not to implement it, risking the cessation of their business.

As gamblers, we're left with little choice in this matter. If we want to gamble, we have to comply with KYC, and that's the unfortunate reality.

While there's a concern that our identity might be stolen, it's crucial to remember that the responsibility for protecting our information lies with the gambling sites. Regulators could penalize them if such breaches occur. However, as gamblers, we're well aware that sharing our KYC information carries potential risks, and we accept that risk when we sign up.

[LUCKMCFLY]

If people want to believe that KYC is for greater security or something like that, you cannot be so ignorant and naive in life, ...

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

Now, let's consider the scenario where a site is not regulated, and users are anonymous. If, unfortunately, there's an inside job, and the regulators find out that the owners stole users' funds, there could be serious consequences. In such cases, the regulators might investigate and, if necessary, shut down the casino. They would then work to distribute any remaining balances to the users.

However, the distribution of funds will likely involve a legal process. It's highly improbable that these funds would be sent to unknown accounts. Regulators would typically have reporting obligations and a proper framework for returning the funds to their rightful owners. But, as you rightly pointed out, the risk lies in unregulated platforms. If they are seized by authorities, the process could be less transparent and the funds might end up in government treasuries as unclaimed funds.

But before things worked well, when we register in a place , we have an ID which is enough to serve people, and now with all this KYC it doesn't seem to you that it is the same but disguised with the option of That governments at one point can extort casinos and force them to give them all their data or else take away their licenses to operate there? At least it has become clear to me that in Biannce things are like that, and that is in very bad taste, so it may be that your arguments are very good, and in fact they sound Excellent , but I am one of those who do not believe in those things, I don't often believe in what they say on the news or something, we always have to consider that they hurt us or try to manipulate us so that they can do things as they wan t, so it's easy for them to do many things, I don't approve of it being possible that a KYC will get you something good, because I see that as a pure fairy tale, if I am an average player, I am not a player who has a lot of money in a casino and it seems bad to me, now imagine what a player can think Whale?

I think whale players don't like this option at all, even though things for them mean more security, I'm sure they don't like it, because whales have to comply with a lot of KYC things , Unless you're In a very cheap casino like stake.com, there are actually many whales who feel comfortable with the sites, so in these types of things we must be very cautious, to comply with KYC is what I say, being in a casino because Be totally trustworthy to people and not wait for things to go Wrong , so as a player you should always feel comfortable with what you have, where you are playing and what you can achieve when based on any casino, that's why a good casino , that is where one must accept the KYC completely.

[JungleCasino]

Your Request Linsting doesnt work

[libert19]

Your Request Linsting doesnt work

It works for me.

[delfastTions]

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

As for me, the main problem with the KYC requirements both at gambling sites and centralized exchanges is that it is not known how exactly and for what purpose the personal data of users are used. I mean that if you give your personal data to any company, you shouldn't be surprised that your data can be stolen and used by malicious people at any time. Unfortunately, there have been many such cases in the crypto industry.

This is exactly the reason to refuse to play in this casino due to the fact that you are required to introduce yourself and undergo a KYC check, and the player himself is afraid that his personal data will eventually be stolen and can be used by some people unknown to him for various purposes . 
And the purposes of this use can indeed be simply harmless, such as targeted advertising for gambling business or new casinos. 
And also, if this data somehow got into the hands of criminals, then the purposes of their use may be of a criminal nature, even to the point of some kind of action similar to extortion or even blackmail. 
Since quite a lot of people in the world are really afraid of such contacts with people they don’t know, many don’t want to go through the KYC procedure.  And such people need to be understood and, in general, they should not be deprived of the opportunity to gamble anonymously.  Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

[NoToKYC]

Get free exclusive bonuses by clicking on the shaking giftbox.

[3kpk3]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

[arwin100]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

But unfortunately some regulator became more strict since this platform has been used by money launderers and other criminals, so maybe this is one added reason on why they implement this KYC to casinos so that they or even the platform could verify easily if their user is not doing any shady activity while using their casino. I also support this no KYC on reputable platform but for now there's none of them offering this so we will really get force to submit this requirements so that we can play, but for other who's so skeptical and can't trust those platform asking that maybe they should find newly launch casino since most of them offering this No KYC thing but the risk is so high knowing that we don't know if we can totally trust them.