No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 100$ BTC GIVEAWAY

[NoToKYC]

Looking for crypto platforms without the KYC hassle? Check out NoToKYC.com.

Your gateway to no-KYC crypto casinos and exchanges. Simple, private, and efficient.
Whether you're a gambler or a trader, if you're looking for No KYC platforms, we've got you covered!

Our AI's Ranking Criteria:
- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.
- Cryptos: Platforms supporting decentralized cryptos like Bitcoin (BTC) and Monero (XMR) rank higher.
- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.
- Withdrawal Time: Instant withdrawals? Our AI approves!
- Accepted Cryptos: Diversity in crypto options fetches a higher rank.
 

How to get EXCLUSIVE BONUSES?

1. Visit No KYC Casinos
2. Click on the shaking gift box in the menu.
3. Follow the simple steps to earn spins.
4. Use your spins to unlock exclusive bonuses.

Join our 100$ BTC Giveaway: https://www.notokyc.com/giveaway/

Best Crypto Casinos No Kyc Crypto Casinos Anonymous Crypto Casinos no deposit bonuses

[1715244211]

1715244211

[1715244211]

1715244211

[SmartGold01]

Your post isn't properly arranged could you reduced the font size and present it very neatly?
Secondly you need to get copper member account to enable you display images so it could be well understood by people around the forum.
I just clicked on your websites what I comprehend from it is that you are trying to share your ref link, that is to say that whomever that goes through this website is automatically ref by Notokyc. Please let me add this to the post, your rating doesn't guaranteed 100 percent reliability from those site you gave your ratings so anyone involving themselves maybe at risk of losing their funds because notokyc site doesn't provide any refund on their site. They are solely on a higher interest to ref and earn some percentage of signup bonus from users.

[Outhue]

I thought NoTOKYC is an actual online casino at first, anyways.

The link consists of few online casinos that doesn't require KYC before anyone can start gambling, thanks for the information but the problem is this list will go down in few years maybe, and that's because many no kYC casinos have started to ask for KYC verification, there is no way to evade this unless the casino is not popular and well successful yet.

Some times I am even thinking that No KYC is a marketing scheme to attract people, because people do love to gamble without any verification, but running the casino for long is going to be a problem when the regulators come for the casino, there will be nothing else the casino team can do than to proceed with verification or risk getting fined and charges.

My advice to everyone reading this is that casinos are not very far from forcing KYC verification on customers some days, enjoy these while they last.

It's not the casino's fault, it's just the way things are in this world, The government always wants a piece of every pie.

[Porfirii]

-snip-

My advice to everyone reading this is that casinos are not very far from forcing KYC verification on customers some days, enjoy these while they last.

It's not the casino's fault, it's just the way things are in this world, The government always wants a piece of every pie.

Unless decentralised casinos get popular in the next few months or years, regulatory trend is to force KYC, so you are right: casinos that don't ask for it have their days counted.

More concerning that the governments getting their share is the destination of the personal documents and data you provide in order to fulfill the KYC: no one guarantees that they won't be sold or leaked at any time, and the use eventually given to them is unsure too.

[Wapfika]

No KYC Crypto Casino or Casino that doesn’t require KYC at first but later on you will be ask once you already register and deposit some money. Most of the casino with Curaçao license has the tendency to apply KYC when they see fit base on the circumstances given to the user.

I doubt this casino that you listed will totally not apply KYC even with some special cases that user is showing some shady behavior in the casino. Only decentralized casino are the only true non kyc casino.

[Plaguedeath]

The heck you include scam LTC casino in your list, I suggest you should remove it because someone had terrible experience with this casino

I disagree for the idea of KYC level, you must only list the level 0 No KYC casino where the site isn't stated to ask KYC in their TOS, while the rest either they ask verification during win big or suspicious activity, it's still a KYC casino.

Little correction: use "Exchange now" rather "Play now" in No KYC exchange. This site is more depth about No KYC exchange https://kycnot.me/

[piebeyb]

No KYC Crypto Casino or Casino that doesn’t require KYC at first but later on you will be ask once you already register and deposit some money. Most of the casino with Curaçao license has the tendency to apply KYC when they see fit base on the circumstances given to the user.

I doubt this casino that you listed will totally not apply KYC even with some special cases that user is showing some shady behavior in the casino. Only decentralized casino are the only true non kyc casino.

This site may just list it without doing any research or testing on the site although this may look good because it provides a site with several lists of casino names without KYC, I am not completely sure that the sites on the list are KYC free, it may be true that in the beginning there will be no KYC for small users and those who only bet small stakes, I would like to see what it would be like to bet big money on one of those sites.

KYC sucks for all gamblers but for me it will never be a problem even the big sites don't ask for my personal identity documents, moreover every KYC verification has a certain level, as a small gambler I'm always safe withdrawing money without having to fill in KYC for example Stake sites , unfortunately not on this site's list. even though in that list there are sites that sometimes ask for KYC too. 

[o48o]

Hi, i visited your site and and skimmed the casinos you are claiming to have no kyc. Quotes i am adding next to Casino names are directly from these sites.

Jackbit
They have a whole section under their terms about their KYC

KYC procedures take place when the respective transaction is to be carried out;

Justbit
They even mentions seperately that they have a kyc procedure

13 After the registration process the User shall provide JustBit with valid identification information under Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures
-cut-
13.4 - KYC procedure is performed under the rules of KYC/AML Policy.

Bc.game
Same under AML

BC.GAME reserves the right, at any time, to ask for any KYC documentation it deems necessary to determine the identity and location of a User. BC.GAME reserves the right to restrict service and payment until identity is sufficiently determined.

Vavada
Under TOS:

In the case of enhanced customer due diligence, customers may be asked to provide the documents listed below in order to comply with our KYC policy

Metaspins
under tos:

9.4 By agreeing to the Terms you authorize us to undertake such verification checks as we may require ourselves or may be required by third parties (including regulatory bodies) to confirm your age, identity and contact details and to prevent money laundering (the "Checks").

Cryptoleo
Under terms:

7.4. We reserve the right to carry out verification procedures for each client at first withdrawal. Such verifications may for example include copies of a player’s passport, national Identity Card, copies of a player’s utility bills, and/or copies of the debit/credit cards used to deposit.

Nitrobetting
under rules and regulations:

IDENTIFY VERIFICATION
Nitrobetting reserves the right to request valid proof of identification from any player.

The fact that casino doesn't ask for it right away doesn't mean they wouldn't be asking it in the future out of blue. So you are providing misleading information just for referrals links.

Only casino on your site that is directly claiming that they don't have any kyc what so ever, is LTCcasino which i frankly find highly suspicious.
Rest of them are complying with regulators, and while casinos might not specifically say that they do kyc, that comes with the whole regulatory compliance package.

[acroman08]

-snip

looks like you beat me to it. I just finished doing a quick read to most of the casinos and I was about to post here that the majority of the casinos on the list will ask for KYC at some point if they deem it necessary and some even need you to perform KYC when doing your first withdrawal

Only casino on your site that is directly claiming that they don't have any kyc what so ever, is LTCcasino which i frankly find highly suspicious.

They had a scam accusation posted against them here in the forum but was resolved in the end, and to be fair, as far as I know, they actually didn't ask for KYC, at least according to the person who created the scam accusation. that being said, I'd still be cautious about depositing and gambling on their gambling site because of the way they handled the same accusation against them and the possible lie they told in that thread to avoid paying the gambler.

[jordanw21]

Hi, i visited your site and and skimmed the casinos you are claiming to have no kyc. Quotes i am adding next to Casino names are directly from these sites.

Jackbit
They have a whole section under their terms about their KYC

KYC procedures take place when the respective transaction is to be carried out;

Justbit
They even mentions seperately that they have a kyc procedure

13 After the registration process the User shall provide JustBit with valid identification information under Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures
-cut-
13.4 - KYC procedure is performed under the rules of KYC/AML Policy.

Bc.game
Same under AML

BC.GAME reserves the right, at any time, to ask for any KYC documentation it deems necessary to determine the identity and location of a User. BC.GAME reserves the right to restrict service and payment until identity is sufficiently determined.

Vavada
Under TOS:

In the case of enhanced customer due diligence, customers may be asked to provide the documents listed below in order to comply with our KYC policy

Metaspins
under tos:

9.4 By agreeing to the Terms you authorize us to undertake such verification checks as we may require ourselves or may be required by third parties (including regulatory bodies) to confirm your age, identity and contact details and to prevent money laundering (the "Checks").

Cryptoleo
Under terms:

7.4. We reserve the right to carry out verification procedures for each client at first withdrawal. Such verifications may for example include copies of a player’s passport, national Identity Card, copies of a player’s utility bills, and/or copies of the debit/credit cards used to deposit.

Nitrobetting
under rules and regulations:

IDENTIFY VERIFICATION
Nitrobetting reserves the right to request valid proof of identification from any player.

The fact that casino doesn't ask for it right away doesn't mean they wouldn't be asking it in the future out of blue. So you are providing misleading information just for referrals links.

Only casino on your site that is directly claiming that they don't have any kyc what so ever, is LTCcasino which i frankly find highly suspicious.
Rest of them are complying with regulators, and while casinos might not specifically say that they do kyc, that comes with the whole regulatory compliance package.

thank you for your research! op almost got me

[NoToKYC]

Hi, i visited your site and and skimmed the casinos you are claiming to have no kyc. Quotes i am adding next to Casino names are directly from these sites.

-SNIP

Hello,
all KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and when.

[Haunebu]

Hmm! Another KYC related thread. I admit that this is a decent attempt by op to try and help gamblers looking for KYC free sites, but he didn't really go into detail regarding sites asking for KYC at different stages.

As some posters above mentioned already, majority of the crypto gambling sites can request KYC at any point for various reasons and they can use their TOS to defend themselves.

You can try to avoid KYC by not doing shady crap and by withdrawing small amounts.

[Mahdirakib]

Don't mislead the gambling community with inaccurate information. Some of those casinos have at least medium range KYC possibility, while you are trying to define them as low range or KYC free casino. KYC verification requirement isn't directly mentioned in StarBets terms, but they may also request the personal information from it's user.

Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!

But you shouldn't define them as "No KYC crypto casinos".

[rhomelmabini]

Is this some kind of movement (starting from your username to the way you post, you sound like it)? I think you should stick with the "no KYC" narrative because if you say "we prioritize low" KYC thing that means that still have KYC in it and that's perfectly not align to your mission. Of course, these days that's a rare case unless you stumble upon a dApp casino which is truly decentralized.

[Wiwo]

Really let see how that goes,  to be 100% off KYC is something that seems almost impossible because even if you run the casino on a KYC-free mode for a while,  how will you handle it when regulators come knocking at your door?

I bet you will either be forced to implement KYC or be forced to close down the casino, These have been the major challenges facing the non-KYC cryptocurrency casinos in recent times which have led to a reduction in the number of No KYC casinos.

[cabron]

Not one on his site offers no KYC but the swap exchange which is also unknown. But the KYC Level Explanation speaks for it on his website.
The only casinos that doesn't as KYC are the ones introducing themselves as decentralized blockchain casino but we may also not be certain how long they can maintain that way. One day you wake up, it will ask for KYC.

There are indeed some casinos and exchanges that are not asking for KYC though. You just can expect the prices to be higher.

[SamReomo]

Hi, i visited your site and and skimmed the casinos you are claiming to have no kyc. Quotes i am adding next to Casino names are directly from these sites.

-SNIP

Hello,
all KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and when.

That means that those casinos still require some kind of KYC verification when needed and that's why it is totally wrong to say that those casinos are no KYC casinos. Whenever a casino adds KYC in their terms then it's a confirm thing that they will require some kind of verification at some stage. I'm pretty sure that all of those casinos will pose KYC thing for the high rollers who win in huge amounts. I'm are pretty sure that if there are a few casinos that aren't asking for KYC right now will surely ask for it after sometime when they get a good amount of users on their site.

[Agbe]

No KYC casino site is good but in most cases at the end KYC is still required when there is an issue. I am not disputing the fact that you can't operate without KYC but I am saying is that, at the beginning you might remove KYC to create impression and attract customers but at time goes when problems arise and can solve without KYC what will you do? You are not the first to operate this. We have seen it in other places as well. And from your explanation, the site performs multiple jobs at a time. One can play bet and also use it for exchange.

[jordanw21]

Not one on his site offers no KYC but the swap exchange which is also unknown. But the KYC Level Explanation speaks for it on his website.
The only casinos that doesn't as KYC are the ones introducing themselves as decentralized blockchain casino but we may also not be certain how long they can maintain that way. One day you wake up, it will ask for KYC.

There are indeed some casinos and exchanges that are not asking for KYC though. You just can expect the prices to be higher.

From my experience, ltc casino is the one from the list which don't ask for KYC for sure. They have no license, so no one can make them to ask for it.

[NoToKYC]

From my experience, ltc casino is the one from the list which don't ask for KYC for sure. They have no license, so no one can make them to ask for it.

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

[jrrsparkles]

OP took referral marketing to another level, he a built site that holds referral links to multiple casinos and come up with a lucrative name no KYC but atleast he should have added better casino names instead of crappy/shady ones so the chances of getting referrals will be higher.

If you look at the no KYC exchange section you will clearly see what this is all about, so OP better include the word no mandatory KYC instead of implying it with your KYC level explanation from 0 to 3.

[notblox1]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

Bold claims.
I checked reviews for Betplay casino that is listed as number 1 on your website, and many people are claiming they dont allow playing or withdrawing if they are located in restricted countries, they are blocking accounts.
They even confirm this by saying that it was stated in their terms, so I dont understand how someone can say this is KYC Level 0 casino 

[Haunebu]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

You are either really dumb or completely naive since these sites will most definitely request KYC when they find something suspicious or if the gambler is trying to withdraw high amounts.

Their TOS helps justify their actions which is why they aren't doing anything illegal here.

[NoToKYC]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

Bold claims.
I checked reviews for Betplay casino that is listed as number 1 on your website, and many people are claiming they dont allow playing or withdrawing if they are located in restricted countries, they are blocking accounts.
They even confirm this by saying that it was stated in their terms, so I dont understand how someone can say this is KYC Level 0 casino 

As I said before: All KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

[danadc]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

Bold claims.
I checked reviews for Betplay casino that is listed as number 1 on your website, and many people are claiming they dont allow playing or withdrawing if they are located in restricted countries, they are blocking accounts.
They even confirm this by saying that it was stated in their terms, so I dont understand how someone can say this is KYC Level 0 casino 

As I said before: All KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

I also see that cases are like this, but when a casino detects that there is a vpn being used, they immediately put the account in review mode and if they start to lose the lkyc, then they detect that it is from a prohibited country, then their account is disabled, for complete and with no opportunity for anything, I want to find casino sites and platforms that use non-kyc, but it is difficult, the one that was still there was frebiitcoin, but they also took it to comply with the characteristics of kyc, I have not complied with Those policies, I have a very old account in that casino, and I don't want to comply with it and I have stopped playing there Because those Demands are not to my Liking.

[Haunebu]

Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.

I disagree. So many sites(New and Old) have proven again and again that they can request KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield which is why what you stated isn't 100% accurate.

When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos.

VPN usage for casinos is complicated. It's usually risky to use them anywhere for various reasons.

[so98nn]

I think it’s only decentralised casinos that are able to operate with no KYC zone and that too with lot of limitations. If they are from friendly country where gambling regulations are pretty loose end then they might just survive for longer. However, there are tiny number of casinos or rather gambling sites that are able to operate freely because simply it’s matter of money laundering.

Whenever we see sites where first income instance is Money itself then it’s gonna be connected with money laundering all the time. Authorities are more prone to watch out such sites and keep them restricted.

I’m not sure how your AI will keep up the track of all those changes but very good luck with the new concept.

[Jawhead999]

Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

They will ask KYC regardless it's now, soon or in the future.

If the casino didn't stated using VPN is fine, you shouldn't directly use VPN before asking through their live support even though you have a good reason e.g. local ISP block the casino, travelling to a country where gambling is banned etc. However if you already ask through the live support, you need to expect they will ask you to complete KYC immediately.

[piebeyb]

Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

They will ask KYC regardless it's now, soon or in the future.

If the casino didn't stated using KYC is fine, you shouldn't directly use VPN before asking through their live support even though you have a good reason e.g. local ISP block the casino, travelling to a country where gambling is banned etc. However if you already ask through the live support, you need to expect they will ask you to complete KYC immediately.

Yes, if you ask live support, maybe you can be calmer because if you don't ask then in the end you will definitely be flagged when using a VPN. The case that often happens nowadays is when most people use VPN and in the end they ask for KYC, even though the site doesn't ask for KYC in the end. will do that if there is something suspicious and also something prohibited.

It should be like that and what you say is true, you should ask live support before doing anything to access a gambling account, because I often find KYC-free casinos but in the end they ask for KYC from users who are flagged and commit violations, I'm not the user who has a problem KYC and also just a small bettor who is always safe without KYC, I think if you want to be KYC free being a small bettor is the best way. 

[Wiwo]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

Bold claims.
I checked reviews for Betplay casino that is listed as number 1 on your website, and many people are claiming they dont allow playing or withdrawing if they are located in restricted countries, they are blocking accounts.
They even confirm this by saying that it was stated in their terms, so I dont understand how someone can say this is KYC Level 0 casino  

As I said before: All KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

NoToKYC if KYC is implemented at any point be it for high withdrawal or deposits plus suspected activities,  it then means that your casino is not a no KYC casino,  and there is no difference between your casino and all the other KYC compliance casinos that we have around.

For that I agree with the statement made by notblox1 calling out for why you make is look bold as if your casino is 100% KYC free,  so for that you have to work on the title of this ANN again because having it the way it is currently will only attract more questioning that you may feel a little bit negative about.

[jordanw21]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

Bold claims.
I checked reviews for Betplay casino that is listed as number 1 on your website, and many people are claiming they dont allow playing or withdrawing if they are located in restricted countries, they are blocking accounts.
They even confirm this by saying that it was stated in their terms, so I dont understand how someone can say this is KYC Level 0 casino  

As I said before: All KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

NoToKYC if KYC is implemented at any point be it for high withdrawal or deposits plus suspected activities,  it then means that your casino is not a no KYC casino,  and there is no difference between your casino and all the other KYC compliance casinos that we have around.

For that I agree with the statement made by notblox1 calling out for why you make is look bold as if your casino is 100% KYC free,  so for that you have to work on the title of this ANN again because having it the way it is currently will only attract more questioning that you may feel a little bit negative about.

An easy way to check whether the casino has KYC or no is to ask their support if they allow duplicate accounts. It may be against gambling responsibility, but this is the price for security.

[delfastTions]

Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and under which circumstances.
When a country is blocked you can use a VPN for some casinos. Thinking about adding info if VPN is allowed for the casinos.

They will ask KYC regardless it's now, soon or in the future.

If the casino didn't stated using KYC is fine, you shouldn't directly use VPN before asking through their live support even though you have a good reason e.g. local ISP block the casino, travelling to a country where gambling is banned etc. However if you already ask through the live support, you need to expect they will ask you to complete KYC immediately.

Over the years, I have seen how the rules of the casino and the entire gambling industry in general are becoming more and more tightened. 
It is now normal for casinos to require KYC identity verification if the game uses cryptocurrencies.  This is of course annoying and just infuriates me and I think that many fans of cryptocurrencies too.  Simply because the most important property of cryptocurrency since its invention was the anonymity of payments.  But the financial and banking lobbies in the USA and European countries are impudently forcing legislators of all countries to introduce this same KYC wherever they pay with cryptocurrency.  By the way, I don’t think that this is generally beneficial to human civilization, but on the contrary, it only makes people more and more controlled by the authorities, which act in most countries only on the basis of their own interests and the interests of a small group of financial magnates.  All this is bad and the introduction of KYC is only a small element of control over the income of the population.  But of course, no casinos will violate the laws and regulations set by these very governments, which in all countries always do not care much about the well-being of the general population.  And of course, they take great care of themselves.

[Webetcoins]

OP took referral marketing to another level, he a built site that holds referral links to multiple casinos and come up with a lucrative name no KYC but atleast he should have added better casino names instead of crappy/shady ones so the chances of getting referrals will be higher.

If you look at the no KYC exchange section you will clearly see what this is all about, so OP better include the word no mandatory KYC instead of implying it with your KYC level explanation from 0 to 3.

Even though many of us dislike a KYC but it's indeed better to be honest and came up with a better domain name if his website includes casinos or exchanges which KYC is still possible to be asked. But there are really sites which has a different level of KYC and there are perks that entails on them.

OP thinks that he can easily turn the heads of the people if he have that kind of domain name, but to have his own referral link on the sites that he review is allowed and actually almost all of the review sites that I visit are like that. It was their right because they promote the casino on their own website. Also the revenue that they can earn will mostly be used on their sites operation so there is no need for us to be jealous about it.

[Wiwo]

An easy way to check whether the casino has KYC or no is to ask their support if they allow duplicate accounts. It may be against gambling responsibility, but this is the price for security.

I don't think so,  because asking the support such question as whether the casino supports multiple accounts will not prove anything,  because KYC demands most times is not scheduled at the opening of accounts and if accounts don't pass the threshold it may not require KYC,  so you see why support can't give you such info because there don't have it.

The best way to know if a casino has KYC demand is first to check to know if they're licensed because all licensed casinos must follow regulatory demands,  and reading through their T&C you will see where the covers that KYC part also.

[BenCodie]

I've given you some merit for encouragement to keep on working on this project.

As most who know me know, I don't like gambling, I do like privacy. kycnot.me serves as a great solution for exchanging...yours could serve as a good solution for gamblers.

The obvious current problem is that you are prioritizing referral links over casinos with no kyc.

Unless you know something we don't, it seems that the list isn't entirely accurate yet. It has the potential to be a great idea if it's improved. If you do know something we don't, add insurance up to $X to collateralize your listing of a casino with a KYC term in their TOS, but is actually good for privacy/no kyc based on your knowledge/experience.

[Synchronice]

Our AI's Ranking Criteria:

This word is bullshit here, you definitely know that. You don't use any artificial intelligence to rank crypto casinos, it's just a manual list that has to meet your criteria.
There is a casino called betplay.io on top of your list but when I hover the mouse over rating, it shows that this casino doesn't have license but actually when I visit the website, it states that it has Costa Rica license.
Also, you have to double check the KYC level of casinos that you grant them in your list. For example, Justbit and Jackbit are granted KYC level 0 on your website while they don't fulfill the requirement for that badge.
KYC level 0 - The site's Terms Of Service (ToS) do not mention any requirement for KYC verification.
Justabit and Jackbit talk about KYC policy.

[noormcs5]

Looking for crypto platforms without the KYC hassle? Check out NoToKYC.com.

So I visited the site NoToKYC.com, downloaded the 10 KYC that you listed there and below is the list.

Now I don't think we need to again visit the site to see the same casino lists over and over again.



Now there are many trusted casinos out there, but require KYC. So it is now up to us to decide whether we prefer a non-KYC casino with the risk of losing money or choose a more trusted casino that requires us to perform KYC.

[Juse14]

Looking for crypto platforms without the KYC hassle? Check out NoToKYC.com.

So I visited the site NoToKYC.com, downloaded the 10 KYC that you listed there and below is the list.

Now I don't think we need to again visit the site to see the same casino lists over and over again.



Now there are many trusted casinos out there, but require KYC. So it is now up to us to decide whether we prefer a non-KYC casino with the risk of losing money or choose a more trusted casino that requires us to perform KYC.

Quite an interesting list and it's very good for people who really don't like gambling sites that enforce KYC on their customers, there are some sites that have licenses and don't enforce KYC, but I don't know how long they last? On average, casinos that already have large valuations and can be accessed by many people from various countries, usually at that point they impose KYC, especially if during their operational journey these casinos are used for illegal acts such as money laundering and so on by users of their services that can be detrimental, there is no choice they will enforce because of course they will get pressure from the local government or in every country that can access the site.

[Agbe]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

Bold claims.
I checked reviews for Betplay casino that is listed as number 1 on your website, and many people are claiming they dont allow playing or withdrawing if they are located in restricted countries, they are blocking accounts.
They even confirm this by saying that it was stated in their terms, so I dont understand how someone can say this is KYC Level 0 casino 

That is one of the problem of no KYC casinos give to gamblers, mostly the withdrawal, since there is no KYC they would used another things to delay withdraw and suspend and ban accounts. If a casino offer no KYC service and they really do the right thing then, no KYC is the best because there will be no stress. And because of what is happening in the online gambling sector with fault claim of identify and other fraudulent activities, almost all casinos ask for KYC to identify the real owner of the account. So if any casino is practicing no KYC then they should be fair enough to deal with gamblers when they win.

[davis196]

How can a NO KYC casino get a Curacao gambling license? Isn't KYC a requirement for getting a gambling license?
It would be nice if you add gambler feedback about which NO KYC casinos are trustworthy and which ones scammed their players in the past.
The problem is that many casinos don't require KYC right after signup but only after the gambler initiates a withdrawal. This seems like a misleading business practice to me, but almost all crypto casinos are doing it.
Anyway, good luck with this project, OP.

[noormcs5]

Quite an interesting list and it's very good for people who reall don't like gambling sites that enforce KYC on their customers, there are some sites that have licenses and don't enforce KYC, but I don't know how long they last? On average, casinos that already have large valuations and can be accessed by many people from various countries, usually at that point they impose KYC, especially if during their operational journey these casinos are used for illegal acts such as money laundering and so on by users of their services that can be detrimental, there is no choice they will enforce because of course they will get pressure from the local government or in every country that can access the site.

Don't you think that it is risky to play on a non-KYC unknown casino? Yes, they will keep giving you small withdrawals without KYC but as soon as you win something big, all of sudden they will realize that you need to do KYC as how you won this big amount. In most of the cases, they will never approve your KYC and never let you withdraw.

If you want to just play for fun, then these casinos may be the right choice for you but if you really want the casino to let you withdraw for all your wins, then you need to register and play at trusted KYC gambling casino.

[Odusko]

Is like the ops have forgotten the fact that this a discussion forum and members here take every detail seriously As of the time of writing this reply this casino is a KYC casino and just like every other KYC casino, you may be asked for your details at any point the team deem it fit to do so and at such one need to get the clear picture.
Thank goodness members of the forum have raised this question as regards the choice of name by this casino, Choosing nokyc as a domain name, and not being free kyc is something that will always spark up reactions.

[Solosanz]

I wonder what the @OP will do after receiving so many criticism about the site

I tend to agree with other users because the domain name you use notokyc.com means you're want to completely stop KYC. While your site are actually review any crypto casino and more like a KYC level.

I don't think temporary no KYC is completely No KYC.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

How to get EXCLUSIVE BONUSES?

1. Visit No KYC Casinos
2. Click on the shaking gift box in the menu.
3. Follow the simple steps to earn spins.
4. Use your spins to unlock exclusive bonuses.

Please, I will like to forward this question to the O.P to help elaborate what he/she mean by to "Get Exclusive Bonus", because what you have is just an ordinary review website and not a casino or neither is it a mixer or an exchange to offer bonus to deposit made or discount to Bitcoin mixed. So you please tell us what your own bonus is all about? Because I just checked, and I could noticed the task needed are just cheap minor tasks, which I'm sure many won't mind doing it for free, but for the fact that you made mentioned of "Exclusive Bonus", it got me more interested in it, and will like to know what its all about.

[Juse14]

Quite an interesting list and it's very good for people who reall don't like gambling sites that enforce KYC on their customers, there are some sites that have licenses and don't enforce KYC, but I don't know how long they last? On average, casinos that already have large valuations and can be accessed by many people from various countries, usually at that point they impose KYC, especially if during their operational journey these casinos are used for illegal acts such as money laundering and so on by users of their services that can be detrimental, there is no choice they will enforce because of course they will get pressure from the local government or in every country that can access the site.

Don't you think that it is risky to play on a non-KYC unknown casino? Yes, they will keep giving you small withdrawals without KYC but as soon as you win something big, all of sudden they will realize that you need to do KYC as how you won this big amount. In most of the cases, they will never approve your KYC and never let you withdraw.

If you want to just play for fun, then these casinos may be the right choice for you but if you really want the casino to let you withdraw for all your wins, then you need to register and play at trusted KYC gambling casino.

Lies to gamblers who don't want to withdraw their money if they win, who doesn't want money today? let alone a gambler. 99% of them definitely need money and want money, even if they just want to get pleasure from gambling, when they win large amounts they definitely want to use it for other pleasures.
If you look at it from this side, it's better to use a trusted casino that has regulations and permits, even though I have to do KYC to fulfill the requirements, is there something wrong? "no" as it should be.

[panjul07]

I tend to agree with other users because the domain name you use notokyc.com means you're want to completely stop KYC. While your site are actually review any crypto casino and more like a KYC level.

I don't think temporary no KYC is completely No KYC.

I thought that this site is providing a list of casinos where there is no KYC at all, but in fact all the casinos in the list are having possible KYC verification.
The chosen domain name NoToKYC is really good for marketing to attract gamblers who do not want to pass KYC in crypto casinos, without a doubt it is an effective to attract but once people visit the list, they will start to get disappointed.
However having "NO" is like too much because nowadays it is really hard to find casino which is completely KYC free.
Maybe having a name like "KYCfriendlycasino" will be much more reasonable, but of course the owner has a full right to choose which name for his site.

[BitcoinPanther]

It looks like the name of the site is a clickbait itself.  I would say, it was a clever idea since the name itself can tap the interest of readers but sadly not among the list given on the site can really offer a no KYC services since one way or another the casino listed on the site requires KYC when some conditions are met.

I tend to agree with other users because the domain name you use notokyc.com means you're want to completely stop KYC. While your site are actually review any crypto casino and more like a KYC level.

I don't think temporary no KYC is completely No KYC.

I thought that this site is providing a list of casinos where there is no KYC at all, but in fact all the casinos in the list are having possible KYC verification.
The chosen domain name NoToKYC is really good for marketing to attract gamblers who do not want to pass KYC in crypto casinos, without a doubt it is an effective to attract but once people visit the list, they will start to get disappointed.
However having "NO" is like too much because nowadays it is really hard to find casino which is completely KYC free.
Maybe having a name like "KYCfriendlycasino" will be much more reasonable, but of course the owner has a full right to choose which name for his site.

Yeah the name of the site is good for marketing but for sensitive people that feels being click baited, the name itself can backfire making visitors annoyed because they feel that they are being cheated of their time since the list of casinos on the site all required KYC in some point of time.

[coolcoinz]

The problem is that many casinos don't require KYC right after signup but only after the gambler initiates a withdrawal. This seems like a misleading business practice to me, but almost all crypto casinos are doing it.
Anyway, good luck with this project, OP.

This would be straight up cheating the player. A casino must have it in the rules that all players are required to undergo the KYC procedure and players have to accept that upon registering.

If they simply forget to ask players early on, it's usually because it takes time to process documents, so companies don't ask you for it right away but wait for you to start gambling. There's a lot of new players who make accounts and never deposit anything, or deposit a small amount like $10, lose it and never play again. It would be a waste of time and resources to try to approve everyone the moment they register.

[Cadaver20]

To complete kyc is really troublesome. Handing over my legal documents to others is really risky. So I welcome this kyc free platform. Although I don't have an account on this platform. But those who have account and are using this platform should share their experience here.

[Hispo]

I get the idea behind publishing non-KYC gambling services and exchange webs, there is certainly a public for it but I have a question about this project.
What does an Artificial intelligence have to do with this?

In my opinion, when evaluating and seeing if a website Terms of Services comply with the tears you are supposed to classify them over, it would be ideal if there was some staff overseeing the selection process and not doing it in an automatic manner.
I get AI has been in the mouths and minds of many people around and it could see appealing to you and your team to use that to further catch the interest of people, but it won't be necessary if you keep your directory with truly non-KYC webs and if you commit to recheck on your selections once in a while, to secure quality.

Good luck with your project. 

[NoToKYC]

Thank you all for your feedback and criticsm.

NoToKYC is more a platform which reviews casinos on their kyc rules and terms give them a kyc level. So people can decide which casino they wan't to join.

KYC LEVEL 0 does mean there is no KYC!
All KYC Levels are discussed with the casino staff, casinos with a gambling license have to add KYC terms to comply with law requirements but this DOESN'T MEAN that they will ever do KYC.
I say it again the casinos decide if they ever do KYC or not, but if they have a licencse they have to include KYC terms even if they won't ever do KYC!

Some of the casinos even allow VPN usage, this info will probably added soon.


The name says no to KYC, so we Iist Casinos with defined KYC Levels and players can choose the casino they find as the best solution with the best KYC rules for their needs by using the site as a ressource to check on their KYC rules.

[Eternad]

Thank you all for your feedback and criticsm.

NoToKYC is more a platform which reviews casinos on their kyc rules and terms give them a kyc level. So people can decide which casino they wan't to join.

KYC LEVEL 0 does mean there is no KYC!
All KYC Levels are discussed with the casino staff, casinos with a gambling license have to add KYC terms to comply with law requirements but this DOESN'T MEAN that they will ever do KYC.
I say it again the casinos decide if they ever do KYC or not, but if they have a licencse they have to include KYC terms even if they won't ever do KYC!

Some of the casinos even allow VPN usage, this info will probably added soon.


The name says no to KYC, so we Iist Casinos with defined KYC Levels and players can choose the casino they find as the best solution with the best KYC rules for their needs by using the site as a ressource to check on their KYC rules.

So there’s really a KYC? No to intitial KYC is I believe your site is promoting by listing casino that doesn’t have a mandatory KYC during the registration process.

Your ANN thread title and username here will surely create an immediate aggressive reaction since most user here only post based on the the title. They rarely browse all post here and jump to the last page to post. It’s better to put this clarification on the OP and bold the text to highlight and avoid confusion. Your title and website url is really confusing to what you are really doing.

[Blitzboy]

Thank you all for your feedback and criticsm.

NoToKYC is more a platform which reviews casinos on their kyc rules and terms give them a kyc level. So people can decide which casino they wan't to join.

KYC LEVEL 0 does mean there is no KYC!
All KYC Levels are discussed with the casino staff, casinos with a gambling license have to add KYC terms to comply with law requirements but this DOESN'T MEAN that they will ever do KYC.
I say it again the casinos decide if they ever do KYC or not, but if they have a licencse they have to include KYC terms even if they won't ever do KYC!

Some of the casinos even allow VPN usage, this info will probably added soon.


The name says no to KYC, so we Iist Casinos with defined KYC Levels and players can choose the casino they find as the best solution with the best KYC rules for their needs by using the site as a ressource to check on their KYC rules.

Its like the "Yelp" of gambling for people who dont want to deal with all the rules. Seriously, following KYC rules can feel like trying to answer a puzzle when some of the pieces are missing. So, its great that you're helping people bridge that gap! The tip about VPN is a cool little nugget that shows you know your readers well. You've found something really good. Keep your cards close and play your hand well, because NoToKYC could be the next big thing in the gaming world.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

If its indeed a no KYC casino then i believe that many gambler will like to give a try provided that they have the required services that tricks gamblers interest, they will also have their own way of making gamblers feels at home and maintain that steadfastness because gamblers experience is a key in using a gambling platform and that's part of the reasons gamblers migrate from one casino to another, alot of people have been having series of issues that partains with KYC o several occasions and getting a gambling platform that already had solution to that will make them feels comfortable in using the platform for gambling.

[pakhitheboss]

If its indeed a no KYC casino then i believe that many gambler will like to give a try provided that they have the required services that tricks gamblers interest, they will also have their own way of making gamblers feels at home and maintain that steadfastness because gamblers experience is a key in using a gambling platform and that's part of the reasons gamblers migrate from one casino to another, alot of people have been having series of issues that partains with KYC o several occasions and getting a gambling platform that already had solution to that will make them feels comfortable in using the platform for gambling.

It is not a casino but a casino review website. They list down casinos that offer no kyc & kyc. It is an interesting way to get affiliate commission from casinos. The problem with no kyc casino's is that they don't have licence to operate. You will not be able to do anything if they shut down.

Kyc casinos are generally those that have licence. Having licence do increases their trust among gamblers. Any dispute can be taken through proper channel since the have a licence. Still the risk prevails that you might lose your coins if the shut down. The risk is lesser to a casino offering no kyc.

[piebeyb]

Kyc casinos are generally those that have licence. Having licence do increases their trust among gamblers. Any dispute can be taken through proper channel since the have a licence. Still the risk prevails that you might lose your coins if the shut down. The risk is lesser to a casino offering no kyc.

Yes, because it doesn't guarantee that you play on a site that is free of KYC or is called decentralized, and vice versa, but there are not too many cases of licensed casinos committing big fraud and the cases can still be investigated, while decentralized casinos may not be so safe and they don't even have a license even though they The reality is that you can get a license easily if you have a lot of money.

But it all comes back to each user because every gambler has his own views, I'm not someone who worries too much about KYC and never complain about it, as long as I play on a big site and have a high reputation on this forum of course I feel safe, after all I just small gambler so the casino will not ask me to complete KYC and as long as I play clean and honestly there will be no risk to that KYC.

[EarnOnVictor]

If its indeed a no KYC casino then i believe that many gambler will like to give a try provided that they have the required services that tricks gamblers interest, they will also have their own way of making gamblers feels at home and maintain that steadfastness because gamblers experience is a key in using a gambling platform and that's part of the reasons gamblers migrate from one casino to another, alot of people have been having series of issues that partains with KYC o several occasions and getting a gambling platform that already had solution to that will make them feels comfortable in using the platform for gambling.

It is not a casino but a casino review website. They list down casinos that offer no kyc & kyc. It is an interesting way to get affiliate commission from casinos. The problem with no kyc casino's is that they don't have licence to operate. You will not be able to do anything if they shut down.

Kyc casinos are generally those that have licence. Having licence do increases their trust among gamblers. Any dispute can be taken through proper channel since the have a licence. Still the risk prevails that you might lose your coins if the shut down. The risk is lesser to a casino offering no kyc.

I like the way you responded here, but the no-KYC casinos might not be entirely bad, only that the risk of working with them is high. Those with KYC still scam people, not to mention those that are not registered or regulated anywhere. Although the registration and regulation are much overrated in casinos as those countries and regulators do little or nothing to protect the interests of gamblers, still, one will be sure that they are duly registered and not dealing with an entirely criminal ring that deals with laundering money and perpetrating some illicit flows.

About the site, what they say whatsoever might be biased since there is an affiliate relation. The risk with no-KYC casinos is there, it's people that should be careful. I'm glad that at least two of them are advertising on BTT, it's another layer of confidence at least until people complain about them.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

If its indeed a no KYC casino then i believe that many gambler will like to give a try provided that they have the required services that tricks gamblers interest, they will also have their own way of making gamblers feels at home and maintain that steadfastness because gamblers experience is a key in using a gambling platform and that's part of the reasons gamblers migrate from one casino to another, alot of people have been having series of issues that partains with KYC o several occasions and getting a gambling platform that already had solution to that will make them feels comfortable in using the platform for gambling.

I definitely will have to agree with you, I think discussions relating to KYC have become the most discussed topic in the gambling boards of this forum, and I believe this is same for several other forums as well, several gamblers hate the hassle of trying to pass kyc verification for several reasons, for some, it's as a result of wanting to maintain their privacy, for some others, it's probably because they don't have any government issued documents acceptable by the casino for their kyc verification, I was once there so I perfectly understand this, there was a time when I had no government issued document to enable pass kyc verifications, at that time, I avoided every and any casino where I will be required to verify my account before deposit or withdrawal, but all this changed when I eventually got my driver's license, plus my national id card, plus other government issued documents as well ..

Anyways, happy that there are still some casinos where kyc is a no, but how long will kyc continue to be a no on this casinos? Specially with the increasing regulation on crypto..

[slapper]

If its indeed a no KYC casino then i believe that many gambler will like to give a try provided that they have the required services that tricks gamblers interest, they will also have their own way of making gamblers feels at home and maintain that steadfastness because gamblers experience is a key in using a gambling platform and that's part of the reasons gamblers migrate from one casino to another, alot of people have been having series of issues that partains with KYC o several occasions and getting a gambling platform that already had solution to that will make them feels comfortable in using the platform for gambling.

I definitely will have to agree with you, I think discussions relating to KYC have become the most discussed topic in the gambling boards of this forum, and I believe this is same for several other forums as well, several gamblers hate the hassle of trying to pass kyc verification for several reasons, for some, it's as a result of wanting to maintain their privacy, for some others, it's probably because they don't have any government issued documents acceptable by the casino for their kyc verification, I was once there so I perfectly understand this, there was a time when I had no government issued document to enable pass kyc verifications, at that time, I avoided every and any casino where I will be required to verify my account before deposit or withdrawal, but all this changed when I eventually got my driver's license, plus my national id card, plus other government issued documents as well ..

Anyways, happy that there are still some casinos where kyc is a no, but how long will kyc continue to be a no on this casinos? Specially with the increasing regulation on crypto..

From the number of threads and talks, it's clear that the KYC topic is like an old song that keeps coming up in the gambling community. The chorus of discontentment is loud: Privacy worries. Document not available. The list keeps going. What's strange, almost in a paradoxical way, is that the world of chance and uncertainty, which is gambling, is so tightly tied to rules and checks of identity. For people like you who are stuck in this weird limbo without proper paperwork, it's not just about ease; it's also about opportunity. The change you detailed, from being left out to being included because of some approved documents, is both enlightening and a little bit sad. Why should the game of dice and cards be tied to such earthly concerns?

[Wiwo]

To complete kyc is really troublesome. Handing over my legal documents to others is really risky. So I welcome this kyc free platform. Although I don't have an account on this platform. But those who have account and are using this platform should share their experience here.

It has always been a big flaup to many casinos who request for gamblers' documents for verifications but in the end leak the documents to hackers who may have them on the black market for various criminal reasons.

More also is the risk of those documents being used to commit various degrees of crimes,  putting the original owners of those documents at risk of legal problems,  so This is the reason that KYC is mostly avoided by cryptocurrency users.

[coin-investor]

Anyways, happy that there are still some casinos where kyc is a no, but how long will kyc continue to be a no on this casinos? Specially with the increasing regulation on crypto..

Only two so far on his list but we never know Maybe in the future for some reason they might go level 1 no KYC There are circumstances where KYC is necessary to catch cheaters to show compliant to authorities and their license issuers, there are no KYC casinos that change their terms so they can protect their casinos from cheaters or they are forced by their license issuers or the regulators.

OP's site is an affiliate platform so he will try to be different and try to target specific gamblers who are looking for NO KYC casino, but be sure everything that is on his list is reputable, Some members have reported that one questionable casino is on the list.

[Z_MBFM]

~Snip~

Your site name is really weird. no kyc cephalitis is highlighted with your site name. it is good to see you already bought copper membership It looks like you are very serious about your casino site.  So you can run signature campaign for better promotion of your site.  Signature campaigns will enable your site to reach different sections of the forum.  Because this forum has more than 3.5 million members many gamble from there.  Since your site is offering No kyc facilities so many can be attracted here. that's why you can try it

[Beparanf]

Anyways, happy that there are still some casinos where kyc is a no, but how long will kyc continue to be a no on this casinos? Specially with the increasing regulation on crypto..

Only two so far on his list but we never know Maybe in the future for some reason they might go level 1 no KYC There are circumstances where KYC is necessary to catch cheaters to show compliant to authorities and their license issuers, there are no KYC casinos that change their terms so they can protect their casinos from cheaters or they are forced by their license issuers or the regulators.

OP's site is an affiliate platform so he will try to be different and try to target specific gamblers who are looking for NO KYC casino, but be sure everything that is on his list is reputable, Some members have reported that one questionable casino is on the list.

Not for some reason but those 2 on the list will only required KYC once they finally get their casino license if they are still pursuing it. Having a license is the only reason why casino ask for KYC due to AML policy. Those casino that asking KYC without license is committing an illegal KYC since they have no right to ask for it since they are not regulated by the law.

I believe a no KYC casino incorporates some level of risk too since unlicensed casino typically turns into scam since they don't have any commitment or doxxed to operate legally.

[TimeTeller]

Anyways, happy that there are still some casinos where kyc is a no, but how long will kyc continue to be a no on this casinos? Specially with the increasing regulation on crypto..

Only two so far on his list but we never know Maybe in the future for some reason they might go level 1 no KYC There are circumstances where KYC is necessary to catch cheaters to show compliant to authorities and their license issuers, there are no KYC casinos that change their terms so they can protect their casinos from cheaters or they are forced by their license issuers or the regulators.

OP's site is an affiliate platform so he will try to be different and try to target specific gamblers who are looking for NO KYC casino, but be sure everything that is on his list is reputable, Some members have reported that one questionable casino is on the list.

Not for some reason but those 2 on the list will only required KYC once they finally get their casino license if they are still pursuing it. Having a license is the only reason why casino ask for KYC due to AML policy. Those casino that asking KYC without license is committing an illegal KYC since they have no right to ask for it since they are not regulated by the law.

I believe a no KYC casino incorporates some level of risk too since unlicensed casino typically turns into scam since they don't have any commitment or doxxed to operate legally.

Definitely, doubt the motive of the unlicensed casino if they started asking KYC from their clients.
Because only licensed casinos usually require their players to submit KYC verification because of the AML policy that they need to abide.
The site list offered by the OP may be good to some players who really don't want to submit their KYC.
However, the dilemma of getting screwed is always there because unlicensed casinos can really mess up with the player's funds if they want to.
Also from the OPs list, I have seen some like vavada which is requiring KYC from their clients before withdrawal, so don't know why it is on the list. He can check it on their terms here - https://vavada.com/en/terms-and-conditions, and verification of identity seems needed on this site.

[Saisher]

All casinos with KYC LEVEL 0 said they would never do KYC even if a high amount was won and more.
Everything was discussed with the casino teams, We did not define the KYC levels by ourselves!

Is there such a thing as KYC level 1 as defined by casinos? It is either they ask it or not, your platform description is misleading and deceptive and there's one questionable name in your NO KYC list.
For you to have a list you disregard the reputation of the casinos if you stick to straight NO KYC you'll only have 4.

[Nrcewker]

Alright these types of information can really help someone who is in need of such a site. The OP could have been designed better, but still works from me. I can see that you have added all the necessary information required here. Moreover my only complaint is that the segregation is done by AI. I mean are we in such a stage that we have to rely on AIs suggestions? OP could have done this work manually, and it would have been attracted more customers to your site. Nevertheless wish you best of luck for your future.

[delfastTions]

Some times I am even thinking that No KYC is a marketing scheme to attract people, because people do love to gamble without any verification, but running the casino for long is going to be a problem when the regulators come for the casino, there will be nothing else the casino team can do than to proceed with verification or risk getting fined and charges.

My advice to everyone reading this is that casinos are not very far from forcing KYC verification on customers some days, enjoy these while they last.

It's not the casino's fault, it's just the way things are in this world, The government always wants a piece of every pie.

By the way, this is indeed a good marketing ploy.  Any normal person will always prefer to receive money without anyone knowing that he received it.  This could be winning in a casino or in any other case.  I would even correlate this desire with the freedom inherent in the human psyche.  By receiving money anonymously, you are not obliged to explain or relort anything to anyone, and this means that you are free from such unnecessary actions or even responsibilities.  Therefore, anonymity in payments is important.
 Also, many people do not want anyone to know that they are gambling in a casino.  And here KYC is, of course, a completely unnecessary procedure.  So, as it turns out, the absence of KYC is necessary for many people and this desire is naturally in high demand.  And this is good marketing.

[3kpk3]

So you can run signature campaign for better promotion of your site.  Signature campaigns will enable your site to reach different sections of the forum.  Because this forum has more than 3.5 million members many gamble from there.  Since your site is offering No kyc facilities so many can be attracted here. that's why you can try it

Are you serious? Why would he want to do that? His site is basically advertising no-KYC sites which is clearly debatable to a large extent. It's like a guide to help gamblers who wish to avoid KYC.

Also, his site isn't offering no-KYC facilities. Check the site properly before posting.

[NoToKYC]

A new casino, exchange & exclusive bonus was added 

[LUCKMCFLY]

Well in view of all this I can say that the No KYC casinos that are currently there now may be that for some players things are different, there are minimum requirements and they are not so concerned about what happens, particularly the casino list What do you have here, I didn't know that they didn't have the No KYC requirement, generally I am a person who likes very reliable casinos, Betplay is one that I have seen there, I think it is good, now the casino that most It hurt me that it didn't have KYC, it was ekll from freebitco.in, because it is a casino that has had a lot of relevance in my life, it was the casino that I have seen all the time, I have played, I have lost, I have won, I have withdrawn, I have deposited with complete normality, never without problems, and besides that their game of twos is the most classic of all, and for that reason I think that things when they are without KYC work better and obviously they let people enter with the use of VPN, I don't know if these casinos comply with that standard, but I would really be a supporter that this is the best thing to do.

As for the casinos that are here, it may be that they do not have the use of KYC, but for how long? The truth is that now there are many problems regarding this, there are casinos that are guided only by doing things like not also accepting the VPN from other countries, and I don't see this as fair, a few years ago, the casinos had no reasons to not accept people with KYC or VPN, now things are so tight that although it is difficult to attract potential players, they do not allow them to have anonymity, privacy and they also prohibit countries, so these types of things are the that a casino should accept, not have any of that, in fact as I had said before, I didn't know that these casinos did not have the KYC requirement, so we could think that that is one way to do things well, and that a government matters ? If a ca casino business the government does not fall.

[aioc]

The heck you include scam LTC casino in your list, I suggest you should remove it because someone had terrible experience with this casino

He still has it on his list and that is not good he should consider taking down a casino with questionable status even if the list is going too short, it's his responsibility to only present the best and most reputable casinos.

I disagree for the idea of KYC level, you must only list the level 0 No KYC casino where the site isn't stated to ask KYC in their TOS, while the rest either they ask verification during win big or suspicious activity, it's still a KYC casino.

I find the list useless when you say no KYC then it says no KYC. There is no such thing as level 1 no-KYC casinos he just put a tag on these casinos, If a user is looking for a no-KYC casino I don't think he will trust this platform/

[robelneo]

Your gateway to no-KYC crypto casinos and exchanges. Simple, private, and efficient.
Whether you're a gambler or a trader, if you're looking for No KYC platforms, we've got you covered!

I know it's not easy launching a casino review site You'll have to do extensive reviews and try the casino so you can explore the casino and come out with good reviews, but choosing a concept that is not popular with a limited number of casinos that you can include and promote is not good when it comes to profitability.

You even come out with your own terms of KYC, when we all know there is no such thing as KYC classification when we say NO it is no, it will just confuse your readers.

Why not put level 4 and level 5 so you can include all the casinos 

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Your gateway to no-KYC crypto casinos and exchanges. Simple, private, and efficient.
Whether you're a gambler or a trader, if you're looking for No KYC platforms, we've got you covered!

I know it's not easy launching a casino review site You'll have to do extensive reviews and try the casino so you can explore the casino and come out with good reviews, but choosing a concept that is not popular with a limited number of casinos that you can include and promote is not good when it comes to profitability.

You even come out with your own terms of KYC, when we all know there is no such thing as KYC classification when we say NO it is no, it will just confuse your readers.

Why not put level 4 and level 5 so you can include all the casinos 

I very much go with your opinion, kyc on different casino platforms are supposed to be of different levels or grade when it comes to difficulty, but then in the end, kyc is still kyc no matter how easy or hard it is to pass, it is still the same personal documents that the user will have to submit for the verification..

So yeah, I go with your opinion on the matter of kyc classification, and speaking about playing on the casinos to gain first hand experience, if op is not doing that or has not done that on the few casinos he has already reviewed, then I wonder what information he or she is sharing, the mandatory job of a reviewer is that you play on the site, test the deposit and withdrawals with different amount of money , see how quick or how much delay it takes before the casino process a withdrawal request, play some of the games as well, I know this is the reviewer risking his or her funds but no one should ever launch a review site if he or she is not ready to sacrifice both time and money to gain first hand experience.

[NoToKYC]

Thank you for all your feedback guys  

We published a blog post about the best privacy coins . You can use them to gamble as we have some no kyc crypto casinos which also accept this coins to enhance your privacy.

[Odusko]

Thank you for all your feedback guys  

We published a blog post about the best privacy coins . You can use them to gamble as we have some no kyc crypto casinos which also accept this coins to enhance your privacy.

Nice to see you responded to that, and i hard a run through the blog post earlier and i will still have a reread again later on to grasp enough understanding of what the term and condition are while using the coin to gamble most especially its advantage over other coins like Bitcoin.
Cause I am curious to know if there are special odds allocations for those who use the coin to stake their games, or is it the same as every other listed coin in the casinos that accept them?

[Webetcoins]

It is not a casino but a casino review website. They list down casinos that offer no kyc & kyc. It is an interesting way to get affiliate commission from casinos. The problem with no kyc casino's is that they don't have licence to operate. You will not be able to do anything if they shut down.

Kyc casinos are generally those that have licence. Having licence do increases their trust among gamblers. Any dispute can be taken through proper channel since the have a licence. Still the risk prevails that you might lose your coins if the shut down. The risk is lesser to a casino offering no kyc.

Maybe he is referring to the casinos shown on that page? I like the fact that they highlight KYC here. They know that this is the main thing that people are considering right now before they use the platform. I'm sure their site will get a lot of traffic because of it and it's going to be easy for them to get a referral this way.

For those who don't want a KYC, they can accept some things like if the casino has no license. They agree that this is one of the consequences for their own freedom but there are still legit non-license casinos out there, so they are going to be just fine. If a license casino shuts down, sometimes we still can't do anything and we still can't get paid so we shouldn't think that they are superior. Apart from the non-licensed one, I think a licensed casino can sometimes don't have a KYC or they don't mandate it, so some of us can also consider them sometimes.

[Slow death]

A new casino, exchange & exclusive bonus was added 

welcome to the forum, when I read the title of the thread I thought it was a new casino that was launched and that it would not have a Curacao license and because of not having a Curacao license consequently the casino would not ask for kyc, but from what I saw from the comments and When I entered your website I realized that it is a review site that is spreading disinformation, something very serious and wrong, all casinos that have a license in Curacao are obliged to do KYC eventually, this means that it would be wrong for you to talk about which casinos as:

1 - https://vavada.com/en (according to what I saw at this casino, they say they have a Curacao license, and will ask for kyc)

6.2. By accepting these Terms of Use, you hereby authorize us to perform, at our sole discretion, periodic checks upon request of third parties (including regulatory authorities) and/or to verify your identity and contact information (hereinafter referred to as “Verification”).

In other words, anyone who creates an account on Vavada must be prepared to do kyc, I hope that no one creates an account on Vavada because they saw this thread that is lying that Vavada doesn't have kyc

2 - https://flush.com ( according to what I saw at this casino, they say they have a Curacao license, and will ask for kyc )

3. As a part of our AML Policy, we may require you to submit copies of documents verifying your identity, address and source of funds. In certain instances we may require you to submit notarized copies of documents to comply with regulatory requirements.

they ask for kyc and it's even a much more problematic kyc compared to many other casinos, so it wouldn't be good for you to lie and claim that they don't ask for kyc while their TOS is very clear that they ask for kyc.

3 - https://bcgame.top

bc game has a curacao license, obviously because it has a license it is a kyc casino, as you can see in its TOS too:

due diligence process (also known as “Know your customer or KYC”)

If these casinos wanted to be a casino that doesn't ask for kyc and were accepting anonymous coins then it would be just because they didn't have a license, but then you need to ask yourself why they chose to have a license and ask for kyc? answer: because of government laws, if these casinos did not have a license they could be subject to government seizure and the owners of these casinos would be accused of money laundering and would be arrested and sentenced to many long years in prison. So here the situation is very clear, casinos must comply with the laws, they are protecting themselves by having a license. Don't spread misinformation

[khaled0111]

Thank you for all your feedback guys  

We published a blog post about the best privacy coins . You can use them to gamble as we have some no kyc crypto casinos which also accept this coins to enhance your privacy.

Nice to see you responded to that,

Respond to what? Is this an IA generated post? What did they respond to?
They didn't do anything aside from promoting one more of their links.. They didn't adreess any of the above concerns, which I conside shady as hell.
I re-read the Ann thread and saying that Curaçao licenses are credible is just.. Laughable, won't say more.

[FinneysTrueVision]

It looks like the name of the site is a clickbait itself.  I would say, it was a clever idea since the name itself can tap the interest of readers but sadly not among the list given on the site can really offer a no KYC services since one way or another the casino listed on the site requires KYC when some conditions are met.

I tend to agree with other users because the domain name you use notokyc.com means you're want to completely stop KYC. While your site are actually review any crypto casino and more like a KYC level.

I don't think temporary no KYC is completely No KYC.

I thought that this site is providing a list of casinos where there is no KYC at all, but in fact all the casinos in the list are having possible KYC verification.
The chosen domain name NoToKYC is really good for marketing to attract gamblers who do not want to pass KYC in crypto casinos, without a doubt it is an effective to attract but once people visit the list, they will start to get disappointed.
However having "NO" is like too much because nowadays it is really hard to find casino which is completely KYC free.
Maybe having a name like "KYCfriendlycasino" will be much more reasonable, but of course the owner has a full right to choose which name for his site.

Yeah the name of the site is good for marketing but for sensitive people that feels being click baited, the name itself can backfire making visitors annoyed because they feel that they are being cheated of their time since the list of casinos on the site all required KYC in some point of time.

The site seems like it was designed to funnel traffic to OP's referral links. The "No KYC" angle is great for advertising but as several people have pointed out these claims are a bit dubious. I would've preferred if they followed kycnot.me's approach where the main listing criteria isn't whether they can gain financially. It might still be a useful site but when there is a financial motive there is a possibility that the information we receive might be biased.

[NoToKYC]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

[Synchronice]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

What about to really update statistics on your website? Do you randomly read comments here? Am I wasting my time?
On your website we read: KYC level 0 - The site's Terms Of Service (ToS) do not mention any requirement for KYC verification. Now, double check your website.Justabit and Jackbit are entitled as KYC level 0 while both of them mention requirements for KYC verification. How is that? It's simple, right? You don't even check websites that you add in your list, why should someone use that? I shouldn't be the one to correct you.

[3kpk3]

Respond to what? Is this an IA generated post? What did they respond to?
They didn't do anything aside from promoting one more of their links.. They didn't adreess any of the above concerns, which I conside shady as hell.

Lol. Agreed. It's pretty evident that op is basically ignoring most criticism since he has no proper response.

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

[dimonstration]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

I think it’s obvious what’s his reason. His website profitability depends on the user that doesn’t prerred KYC when playing in a casino somhe will surely stick to even if he mislead someone that casino doesn’t apply KYC since this is what his service offered.

In reality, Casino with Curacao license will always require KYC at any point of the user game. I believe the should start listing on Decentralized casino and forget Centralized Casino since there’s always a threat for license for them.

[Mahdirakib]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Casino team says various things to the casino promoters for marketing purpose. Do you know any Curacao licensed casino which haven't asked their user to complete the KYC verification (except the newly launched casino). You have given '0' ratings for the JustBit KYC verification requirement. I think these two threads are enough to prove your rating as wrong.
• justbit.io asks for KYC (their site say NO KYC) then confiscates my winnings
• justbit.io scam, refuse to pay me out

Don't take the casino terms very lightly. You won't be able to deny the KYC verification if a licensed casino enforce you to do that based on the terms. There are a small number of casinos left without the KYC verification requirement. You will find some of them here: Information of Crypto Casinos License and KYC requirements

[Cling18]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

I think it’s obvious what’s his reason. His website profitability depends on the user that doesn’t prerred KYC when playing in a casino somhe will surely stick to even if he mislead someone that casino doesn’t apply KYC since this is what his service offered.

In reality, Casino with Curacao license will always require KYC at any point of the user game. I believe the should start listing on Decentralized casino and forget Centralized Casino since there’s always a threat for license for them.

There are really people who prefer putting profit on top of everything than thinking of other's welfare. It is their main goal to make a profit rather than to spread legit reliable information. If this information misleads lots of gamblers who are expecting non-KYC casinos, they might face hardships in the future. Most licensed casinos nowadays usually require KYC and I don't see anything wrong with that because it's goal is also to protect their site as well as their players from fraudulent activities. Better comply with it rather than risk in untrusted casinos.

[Onyeeze]

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Stop acting innocent. You know damn well that any of these sites can enforce KYC whenever they want to using the TOS as their shield, but you aren't willing to admit that for reasons that only you are aware of.

I think it’s obvious what’s his reason. His website profitability depends on the user that doesn’t prerred KYC when playing in a casino somhe will surely stick to even if he mislead someone that casino doesn’t apply KYC since this is what his service offered.

In reality, Casino with Curacao license will always require KYC at any point of the user game. I believe the should start listing on Decentralized casino and forget Centralized Casino since there’s always a threat for license for them.

There are really people who prefer putting profit on top of everything than thinking of other's welfare. It is their main goal to make a profit rather than to spread legit reliable information. If this information misleads lots of gamblers who are expecting non-KYC casinos, they might face hardships in the future. Most licensed casinos nowadays usually require KYC and I don't see anything wrong with that because it's goal is also to protect their site as well as their players from fraudulent activities. Better comply with it rather than risk in untrusted casinos.

KYC should be one of the priorities of any gambling websites or a platform, because if a casino platform is being operate with a license their is nothing will make them not to request for KYC to any of their customers, if they customers verify their account and it happens that their customers is not reliable base what it does in their platform, with the KYC verification the customer can be fish out, I don't know why some of the customers doesn't agree to verify their account in some of this casino or gambling platforms, I don't know some people plans and thinking over not to be done their KYC

[Fivestar4everMVP]

KYC should be one of the priorities of any gambling websites or a platform, because if a casino platform is being operate with a license their is nothing will make them not to request for KYC to any of their customers, if they customers verify their account and it happens that their customers is not reliable base what it does in their platform, with the KYC verification the customer can be fish out, I don't know why some of the customers doesn't agree to verify their account in some of this casino or gambling platforms, I don't know some people plans and thinking over not to be done their KYC

One thing you must understand is that, how you undervalue your privacy is not how other persons undervalue their privacy, there are some who will not want to share their personal information to third parties for the fear of the unknown, which most of the time is as a result of the fact that some of this casinos end up selling those documents to hackers or other bad actors in or on the dark web for money.

Regardless of the fact that most gambling casinos have started requiring their customers and potential customer to pass kyc verification for the best casino experience, it is still very important for we; the gamblers to be very careful and mindful of the type of casinos we are sharing our personally information with, because sometimes, this action may come back to hurt us if the wrong people get hold of our private and personal details .

[Odusko]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Nice to read this replies from the the admin and this attests to the fact that the casino is a KYC compliant and that it shouldn't have carried the latter boldly stated on the domain that no KYC, this could breed a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings within the community who may not take the time to read through this entire thread may fall into it by registering thinking that it a KYC free casino since it looks mentioned so in the title.

[AmoreJaz]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Nice to read this replies from the the admin and this attests to the fact that the casino is a KYC compliant and that it shouldn't have carried the latter boldly stated on the domain that no KYC, this could breed a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings within the community who may not take the time to read through this entire thread may fall into it by registering thinking that it a KYC free casino since it looks mentioned so in the title.

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

[lienfaye]

Hi, i visited your site and and skimmed the casinos you are claiming to have no kyc. Quotes i am adding next to Casino names are directly from these sites.

-SNIP

Hello,
all KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and when.

You can't be so certain that the casino will not really ask KYC on their users since they're regulated. It's still on their discretion and can be asked at anytime, maybe if the time comes you win a decent amount on their platform.

Anyway, I appreciate the effort for making these lists. However, those casinos are not really a no kyc platform. Therefore gamblers must read the ToS (especially the kyc section) before considering to try playing.

[Apocollapse]

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

It's true, but if those review sites are not updated or giving false information, that's mean better to not read those review sites as we need to check every sites to validate the information. So the question is, why need to have a review sites when the owner isn't capable to update the information?

Review site is important because it make me no need to check one by one site.

[3kpk3]

There are really people who prefer putting profit on top of everything than thinking of other's welfare. It is their main goal to make a profit rather than to spread legit reliable information.

Most people are like this sadly thanks to the money factor. One big example in this forum is the 1xbit fiasco where a shit-ton of shills are involved who promote that scam site just for quick bucks.

Review site is important because it make me no need to check one by one site.

Such review sites are pointless if the information that they are sharing isn't 100% accurate.

[Crypt0Gore]

Hi friend, do you know that some casinos don't ask for KYC for gambling?

My Ans: it's only a matter of time, leave them be for now, when the time is right they will be the one asking, they will be forced to ask KYC because success can't be hidden from the authorities, they will come for every successful casinos, unless they want to get shut down.

It's easier for a brand new casino with zero to no reputation at all keep their No-KYC policy alive, because no one will bother them, but as they maintain the business for a long time and many new customers keep onboarding the platform, the authorities will be alerted and they will either fine you or warn you to start asking for KYC, if your casino is really registered you can't escape the necessity of KYC requirements, it's inescapable.

OP, I really appreciate the effort you put into this, but many online casinos have erased every no-KYC policy that they started at the very beginning of their early lives, it's a good way to attract new people to the platform since so many still want a no KYC casino, but they don't always last long.

[piebeyb]

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

Yes, because it is impossible for this third party site to continue to update every update that you make, so it is a waste of time for other gamblers to access this site to see the updated requirements, let alone see the requirements which can sometimes change at any time, it is best to read directly from the official site to make it easier. , after all it would be impossible for large casinos to change their terms without notifying customers.

Always check emails and anything on their site because reading doesn't cost us time because it's all for our convenience in gambling, I know not everyone likes KYC but there are also some big sites that don't ask for full KYC to withdraw thousands of dollars, so it's best to use the forum this and do your own research in depth so that you don't have problems in the future. after all it doesn't take hours to check it.

[livingfree]

I think that I have seen a thread that has listed no-kyc casinos I just can't remember it now. But having this list will help someone who's looking for the non-kyc casinos but we have to be aware that it could change any moment.

They could become a compliant casino that only follows the orders of their regulatory body that they're subject for an approval for their license or anything sort of that stuff that affects their operation.

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

I agree, there can be some reviews that have been outdated already and that's why some info are no longer accurate. That's it's still us that will have to check them out as the typical suggestion of many, DYOR.

[NoToKYC]

We have released our first gambling script. Check it out here: Dice Gambling Script

[ChuckBuck]

How generous of NoToKYC.com to present such an "exclusive" platform. But here's some free advice: don't get too comfortable. I've seen countless platforms promising no KYC and then turning their backs on players when they win bick. Time will, inevitably, reveal the truth about your venture. And for all the gamblers there: Do your research, be skeptical, and for heaven's sake, gamble responsibly.  
To NoToKYC: hope that you will keep the promises

[Ojima-ojo]

Does it mean that the ops did not take the time to read through the terms of service before promoting the casino,  and even from the title of this thread one can easily see the point that makes the title to state no KYC.


Between we have to apply caution when dealing with the new casinos that promised some kind of services that look unrealistic and not clearly stated in their terms of service.

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision to require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are discussed with the casino teams!

What about to really update statistics on your website? Do you randomly read comments here? Am I wasting my time?
On your website we read: KYC level 0 - The site's Terms Of Service (ToS) do not mention any requirement for KYC verification. Now, double-check your website.Justabit and Jackbit are entitled to KYC level 0 while both of them mention requirements for KYC verification. How is that? It's simple, right? You don't even check websites that you add to your list, why should someone use that? I shouldn't be the one to correct you.

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

[khaled0111]

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

Personally, I have no problem with casinos or any other services that enforce kyc, be it level 1 or complete verification, as long as they are being transparent and don't try to hide it. What am against is those who claim they don't require it but will ask you to verify your identity and freeze your account as soon as you make a big win or try to cash out.
If you are not going to comply with the Curaçao license terms then why having it in first place!

[Odusko]

-snip

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

Nice to read this replies from the the admin and this attests to the fact that the casino is a KYC compliant and that it shouldn't have carried the latter boldly stated on the domain that no KYC, this could breed a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings within the community who may not take the time to read through this entire thread may fall into it by registering thinking that it a KYC free casino since it looks mentioned so in the title.

well, at the end of the day, it is still the responsibility of the gambler to check the site's terms by himself. as like with other review or listing sites, you can't guarantee that their information is also up-to-date and legit. so before registering to any casino, make sure you've done your due diligence and not relying the information from someone else's site. they can serve as a guide, but you still have the job to verify such info.

The primary responsibility of every gambler is to first of all check and read through the casinos terms and conditions, checking to see if the term go in line with their desire and what they can afford to bear, more also most casinos that attract customers always have a system that is highly flexible on the customers and can allow them to deposits and withdraws without KYC demands.
Where KYC is only demanded when a gambler wants to make a withdrawal above the minimum amount set by the casino for unverified accounts, At that point the customer may be asked to go through KYC, another time KYC can also be demanded is when your account is suspected to have exhibited suspension activities kyc can also be demanded that.

[coupable]

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

There is no problem with sites that enforce KYC, at all levels, as long as they indicate the necessity of doing so on the terms of use page. The user agrees to these terms during registration for the first time.
The problem is with sites that claim that they do not enforce KYC or that they only enforce KYC level 0, and then after a while they start imposing KYC procedures. It is sufficient for it to amend the “Terms of Use” without taking into account the options of users who agreed to certain conditions for the first time. The least that can be done is to notify users sufficiently in advance before making the modification.

[348Judah]

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

There is no problem with sites that enforce KYC, at all levels, as long as they indicate the necessity of doing so on the terms of use page. The user agrees to these terms during registration for the first time.
The problem is with sites that claim that they do not enforce KYC or that they only enforce KYC level 0, and then after a while they start imposing KYC procedures. It is sufficient for it to amend the “Terms of Use” without taking into account the options of users who agreed to certain conditions for the first time. The least that can be done is to notify users sufficiently in advance before making the modification.

Some common mistakes always comes from the gambler side, if you're using a casino that supports kyc and they did not request for such when you first started doesn't mean they are not going to do so later, they are only being patient to see you enjoy their website use for a while before you make any requests from them to perform certain functions then they subject you to their initial KYC, which i don't see anything bad or new here, if you being a gambler that does not want KYC then you should go for a casino that does not support for KYC right from the start.

[Ojima-ojo]

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

There is no problem with sites that enforce KYC, at all levels, as long as they indicate the necessity of doing so on the terms of use page. The user agrees to these terms during registration for the first time.
The problem is with sites that claim that they do not enforce KYC or that they only enforce KYC level 0, and then after a while they start imposing KYC procedures. It is sufficient for it to amend the “Terms of Use” without taking into account the options of users who agreed to certain conditions for the first time. The least that can be done is to notify users sufficiently in advance before making the modification.

Some common mistakes always comes from the gambler side, if you're using a casino that supports kyc and they did not request for such when you first started doesn't mean they are not going to do so later, they are only being patient to see you enjoy their website use for a while before you make any requests from them to perform certain functions then they subject you to their initial KYC, which i don't see anything bad or new here, if you being a gambler that does not want KYC then you should go for a casino that does not support for KYC right from the start.

The most commonly made mistakes by gamblers is in the area of not reading of the terms and conditions of the casino before depositing and playing onnthose sites, there is no other way to know what await you from your engagement with a casino unless you read the T&C.


A few of the complains that jave been recorded, were all based on the fault of rhe gambler not reading and complying with the site demands.

[NoToKYC]

Many of you haven't taken our exclusive bonuses yet. Click on the shaking giftbox and get them

[NoToKYC]

A new casino and exclusive bonus was added

[2double0]

Some more information should be added that in which category each casino fits into. Some allow their own created virtual games, some provide sportsbets, some are only for casino games (real and virtual), while there are some that only allow few selected games.

Many of you haven't taken our exclusive bonuses yet. Click on the shaking giftbox and get them

The giftbox is a great way to advertise and increase your followers for your social media, a nice concept truly. Is it only free spins that we get through giftbox spins? Or are there some other surprises too?

[NoToKYC]

Some more information should be added that in which category each casino fits into. Some allow their own created virtual games, some provide sportsbets, some are only for casino games (real and virtual), while there are some that only allow few selected games.

Many of you haven't taken our exclusive bonuses yet. Click on the shaking giftbox and get them

The giftbox is a great way to advertise and increase your followers for your social media, a nice concept truly. Is it only free spins that we get through giftbox spins? Or are there some other surprises too?

Yeah there are different bonuses. Exclusive Free spins and deposit bonuses

[stadus]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

[delfastTions]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

I think that potentially, businessmen who organize a casino and the operation of this casino in practice always know very well that they will definitely carry out identity verification checks according to the KYC procedure.  And in order to preserve their business, they will also be required to constantly monitor the flow of cryptocurrency by introducing mandatory verification using AML. 
however, such casino managers often instruct marketing services not to indicate too clearly and openly that the player will have to undergo KYC, and even more so if he wins.  This question can be formulated and stated in such a way, for example, even in the ToS, that the player will think that he can safely play in this casino and no one will   want to know his identity and he will calmly receive his winnings without any KYC.  And of course, advertising such as the absence of KYC works great and the number of players in such a casino is growing.  But at some moment, completely unexpected for you, the support of such a casino will inform you that they are forced to carry out KYC right now, because this is a legal requirement.  But supposedly just yesterday it was possible without KYC.  This is of course an outright lie. 
So you should always take into account that when playing in a casino, if you win, you will still have to provide your verification data.

[noormcs5]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

I think that potentially, businessmen who organize a casino and the operation of this casino in practice always know very well that they will definitely carry out identity verification checks according to the KYC procedure.  And in order to preserve their business, they will also be required to constantly monitor the flow of cryptocurrency by introducing mandatory verification using AML. 
however, such casino managers often instruct marketing services not to indicate too clearly and openly that the player will have to undergo KYC, and even more so if he wins.  This question can be formulated and stated in such a way, for example, even in the ToS, that the player will think that he can safely play in this casino and no one will   want to know his identity and he will calmly receive his winnings without any KYC.  And of course, advertising such as the absence of KYC works great and the number of players in such a casino is growing.  But at some moment, completely unexpected for you, the support of such a casino will inform you that they are forced to carry out KYC right now, because this is a legal requirement.  But supposedly just yesterday it was possible without KYC.  This is of course an outright lie. 
So you should always take into account that when playing in a casino, if you win, you will still have to provide your verification data.

Usually, the casinos, especially the new ones will try to implement such promotions whereby they can gather more customer's and No KYC is one card that get most attraction.
When you tell someone that you can gamble without KYC, he / she will get immediately attracted to it.  That is why we find new casino having this "No KYC" label.

However, it is seem often that as long as you are depositing, playing and losing at these casino, you are good to go but if you win anything big and try to withdraw, then suddenly all the legalizations and complications come into play and you will find your account freeze or close. That is a reason No KYC casino are mostly risky to play.

[freedomgo]

However, it is seem often that as long as you are depositing, playing and losing at these casino, you are good to go but if you win anything big and try to withdraw, then suddenly all the legalizations and complications come into play and you will find your account freeze or close. That is a reason No KYC casino are mostly risky to play.

That's the scenario you will experience if you are gambling in a casino that isn't reputable. KYC (Know Your Customer) is supposed to be just a basic requirement; if a casino chooses to implement it, they should do it correctly from the very beginning. That's why some gamblers have trust issues with casinos because casinos themselves are violating the mandates from their regulators by failing to implement KYC right away, as they want to attract gamblers to sign up on the site.

It wouldn't be attractive if casinos required KYC right away, would it?

[armanda90]

Usually, the casinos, , especially the new ones will try to implement such promotions whereby they can gather more customer's and No KYC is one card that get most attraction.
When you tell someone that you can gamble without KYC, he / she will get immediately attracted to it.  That is why we find new casino having this "No KYC" label.

However, it is seem often that as long as you are depositing, playing and losing at these casino, you are good to go but if you win anything big and try to withdraw, then suddenly all the legalizations and complications come into play and you will find your account freeze or close. That is a reason No KYC casino are mostly risky to play.

More excited with new gambling platform without KYC for gambler actually when having new gambling platform launching, I think less attraction with new gambling platform first launching KYC (Know Your Customer) is basic requirement. Easily deposit and withdrawing without KYC not take time for gambler have submit document ID for participating in gambling platform make them looking for reputable gambling platform aren't required with KYC.

Have been pattern of gambling platform activities, how much your loss reached above ten thousand dollar is not important and account still secure but difference when your withdrawing suddenly above $1k have to prepare document for passing KYC although with that gambling platform not required with KYC.

[stadus]

It wouldn't be attractive if casinos required KYC right away, would it?

Yes, the fact that we are in the crypto world means that most of us are probably avoiding KYC requirements. Otherwise, we would just choose a fiat casino, as they undoubtedly offer as many games as crypto casinos, if not more. However, with increasing government intervention, we can't avoid KYC requirements from becoming more common. Even playing on a non-KYC casino carries some risk. To minimize this risk, it's crucial to manage your exposure wisely. Don't become overconfident and risk a significant amount of money—only risk what you can afford to lose in case a casino turns out to be fraudulent. I'm not saying that NO KYC casinos are all untrustworthy, but it's essential to understand the difference in risk levels between non-KYC and KYC casinos.

[348Judah]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

Any casino or gambling platforms that indicates no kyc should then not require it because it has already been stayed, but we also have to confirm this by reading it on their ToS if it also reflected, some may not talked about no kyc requirements and yet still make demands on that later, lastly, we have to understand the context that no kyc is being stated, some may refer to this that kyc is not required to create an account, this doesn't mean that they are not a kyc gambling platform, they will still request for kyc after your registration, except they specifically noted that they are entirely a no KYC casino.

[Taskford]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

Any casino or gambling platforms that indicates no kyc should then not require it because it has already been stayed, but we also have to confirm this by reading it on their ToS if it also reflected, some may not talked about no kyc requirements and yet still make demands on that later, lastly, we have to understand the context that no kyc is being stated, some may refer to this that kyc is not required to create an account, this doesn't mean that they are not a kyc gambling platform, they will still request for kyc after your registration, except they specifically noted that they are entirely a no KYC casino.

They made their name as No KYC casino so people could assume that this will never be ask at any cost since that's what they market to us here. It would be crazy if later on they ask this since for this since maybe many would feel that they are been deceive since asking this when withdrawal request happen is somehow can be consider as shady action done by them or other casino. KYC is controversial topic and there are some new casino owners take advantage on situation and we know how it end up from some people believe on the words they say.  Maybe for new casino they should be honest regarding on KYC since at current situation where regulation implemented on some casinos for sure this will be ask especially if they ask to get some licenses to make their casino legitimate to people looking at it and also to government regulating some financial platforms.

[fullhdpixel]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

Any casino or gambling platforms that indicates no kyc should then not require it because it has already been stayed, but we also have to confirm this by reading it on their ToS if it also reflected, some may not talked about no kyc requirements and yet still make demands on that later, lastly, we have to understand the context that no kyc is being stated, some may refer to this that kyc is not required to create an account, this doesn't mean that they are not a kyc gambling platform, they will still request for kyc after your registration, except they specifically noted that they are entirely a no KYC casino.

A few months back, a casino that was also available on this forum was actually having a clear statement on their homepage that they don't require KYC from cryptocurrency gamblers, but then users were complaining that they are asking for KYC verification at the time of withdrawal which caused a lot of backlash at the casino and they basically deserved it because if they had that statement for the public to see, they should have stood by it practically.

So, it's true that if a platform makes an announcement that they are a no-KYC casino, they need to keep their promise and don't ask anyone for KYC no matter how small or large their deposits and withdrawals are because it is no excuse to ask for KYC for large withdrawals and then say you are a no-KYC casino.

[Fatunad]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

Any casino or gambling platforms that indicates no kyc should then not require it because it has already been stayed, but we also have to confirm this by reading it on their ToS if it also reflected, some may not talked about no kyc requirements and yet still make demands on that later, lastly, we have to understand the context that no kyc is being stated, some may refer to this that kyc is not required to create an account, this doesn't mean that they are not a kyc gambling platform, they will still request for kyc after your registration, except they specifically noted that they are entirely a no KYC casino.

They made their name as No KYC casino so people could assume that this will never be ask at any cost since that's what they market to us here. It would be crazy if later on they ask this since for this since maybe many would feel that they are been deceive since asking this when withdrawal request happen is somehow can be consider as shady action done by them or other casino. KYC is controversial topic and there are some new casino owners take advantage on situation and we know how it end up from some people believe on the words they say.  Maybe for new casino they should be honest regarding on KYC since at current situation where regulation implemented on some casinos for sure this will be ask especially if they ask to get some licenses to make their casino legitimate to people looking at it and also to government regulating some financial platforms.

We know that crypto people would really be always prefer on having that no kyc platform but since this platforms or business does involved huge money then expect that regulations would really be next in line.
Also there are really people who do really mind about having license because they do really see it as a proof about sites legitimacy which we know that it is a common approach but we know that licenses cant really assure out 100% security if funds are really that taken or been ran away specially here on crypto space but somehow it does have a better security compared into those who do ran off a fully anonymous platform which it does really have its cons when it comes to users funds been stored up on the said platform . This is why some people would really be preferring about being regulated or centralized rather than being not.
Making out with those false claims specially on start up is really not something that good because once people or the community would really be having that kind of impression that been mold up
then sooner or later your platform or company would really be leaving no people been playing around because of the thing you had done earlier. When trust been broken then its not
something that could be taken it back.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Most of the gambling sites that require both level 0 of 1 kyc always state them clearly in the terms and conditions so that they can keep the customers informed about the casino stances on kyc and what customers can expect when dealing with the site.

There is no problem with sites that enforce KYC, at all levels, as long as they indicate the necessity of doing so on the terms of use page. The user agrees to these terms during registration for the first time.
The problem is with sites that claim that they do not enforce KYC or that they only enforce KYC level 0, and then after a while they start imposing KYC procedures. It is sufficient for it to amend the “Terms of Use” without taking into account the options of users who agreed to certain conditions for the first time. The least that can be done is to notify users sufficiently in advance before making the modification.

Some common mistakes always comes from the gambler side, if you're using a casino that supports kyc and they did not request for such when you first started doesn't mean they are not going to do so later, they are only being patient to see you enjoy their website use for a while before you make any requests from them to perform certain functions then they subject you to their initial KYC, which i don't see anything bad or new here, if you being a gambler that does not want KYC then you should go for a casino that does not support for KYC right from the start.

The most commonly made mistakes by gamblers is in the area of not reading of the terms and conditions of the casino before depositing and playing onnthose sites, there is no other way to know what await you from your engagement with a casino unless you read the T&C.


A few of the complains that jave been recorded, were all based on the fault of rhe gambler not reading and complying with the site demands.

I think something, always when things are transparent things should be done like a casino apart from reading the Tos, which is something annoying and slow, because it is an imperative duty, these things should not be left lightly, we as well Players must set an example, now having said this, 'for me one thing is certain, every time we enter a casino we always check what the KYC is like, there is no other way but to see what it is about, first because things They must be made from a casino and taken into consideration, I have taken as a forecast that if I am interested in a casino, I would prefer to do the KYC first, and see to what extent that KYC helps me to make a withdrawal, because as they have said, the casinos have different levels of KYC, I imagine it is a couple of minutes, so for me this should go as the first option before making any deposit, but I have already taken that option if I am really interested in a casino, because then going through the terrible moment that sometimes At the time of withdrawal, do they ask me for a KYC? It is something that I would not like to happen, however I am one of the people who accept that the new regulations ask or require KYC, I was reading somewhere that there are casinos that sometimes do not say it at once, but that each KYC is done as an additional condition, or a very hidden term there, then it doesn't seem fair to me.

Each casino has its own style, so when there are these types of things that are so flashy and so delicate, I have read in the forum in many threads where there are many users who feel deceived, because they are usually told in the casinos at the time of register that they do not need KYC, but at the time of withdrawal if they require it, then they are told that only some users require KYC, it is like politics, something like that, then when things are widely demonstrated that it is necessary a KYC, false advertising is not good, because later it is much more difficult to do it.

[slapper]

~snip~

I think something, always when things are transparent things should be done like a casino apart from reading the Tos, which is something annoying and slow, because it is an imperative duty, these things should not be left lightly, we as well Players must set an example, now having said this, 'for me one thing is certain, every time we enter a casino we always check what the KYC is like, there is no other way but to see what it is about, first because things They must be made from a casino and taken into consideration, I have taken as a forecast that if I am interested in a casino, I would prefer to do the KYC first, and see to what extent that KYC helps me to make a withdrawal, because as they have said, the casinos have different levels of KYC, I imagine it is a couple of minutes, so for me this should go as the first option before making any deposit, but I have already taken that option if I am really interested in a casino, because then going through the terrible moment that sometimes At the time of withdrawal, do they ask me for a KYC? It is something that I would not like to happen, however I am one of the people who accept that the new regulations ask or require KYC, I was reading somewhere that there are casinos that sometimes do not say it at once, but that each KYC is done as an additional condition, or a very hidden term there, then it doesn't seem fair to me.

Each casino has its own style, so when there are these types of things that are so flashy and so delicate, I have read in the forum in many threads where there are many users who feel deceived, because they are usually told in the casinos at the time of register that they do not need KYC, but at the time of withdrawal if they require it, then they are told that only some users require KYC, it is like politics, something like that, then when things are widely demonstrated that it is necessary a KYC, false advertising is not good, because later it is much more difficult to do it.

It's such a pain, isn’t it? Every casino, in my opinion, should be completely transparent about their KYC. It's unfair to keep players in the dark and then reveal the information when they try to make a withdrawal. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I see such practices. I agree with you that it's best to take care of the KYC stuff up front. This way, I don't have any surprises later on. I understand the inconvenience, but the benefits to my sanity are well worth it. I think it's critical that we, as players, insist on honesty and fair play from online casino

[BlackBoss_]

It's such a pain, isn’t it? Every casino, in my opinion, should be completely transparent about their KYC. It's unfair to keep players in the dark and then reveal the information when they try to make a withdrawal. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I see such practices.

It's a bad practice and is harmful for a casino reputation. They must have term in their Terms of Service for KYC, is it mandatory, is it additional requirement only when something is detected by the casino. The second term is vague and if a casino has it in their Terms of Service, I have to ask my self that do I agree to do KYC? If I am ready to do this, I would prefer to do this after registering my account and don't wait for a KYC card pulling by the casino to submit KYC documents.

I agree with you that it's best to take care of the KYC stuff up front. This way, I don't have any surprises later on. I understand the inconvenience, but the benefits to my sanity are well worth it. I think it's critical that we, as players, insist on honesty and fair play from online casino

I agree with you too and want to do the same. I only deposit money after I successfully KYC and I am sure that I will not have issue with KYC later.

[Ben Barubal]

        I think the other casinos mentioned seem to require KYC. Well, it seems that not all of them are legitimate without KYC; maybe at the beginning of the registration they don't have KYC, but later it is possible that the casino platform will demand KYC from their gamblers.

        So further research is still needed to identify if it is true that the platform mentioned is 100% no-kyc. And there's nothing wrong with investigating and learning to read the TOS of each casino you'll be playing at first.

[Taskford]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

Any casino or gambling platforms that indicates no kyc should then not require it because it has already been stayed, but we also have to confirm this by reading it on their ToS if it also reflected, some may not talked about no kyc requirements and yet still make demands on that later, lastly, we have to understand the context that no kyc is being stated, some may refer to this that kyc is not required to create an account, this doesn't mean that they are not a kyc gambling platform, they will still request for kyc after your registration, except they specifically noted that they are entirely a no KYC casino.

They made their name as No KYC casino so people could assume that this will never be ask at any cost since that's what they market to us here. It would be crazy if later on they ask this since for this since maybe many would feel that they are been deceive since asking this when withdrawal request happen is somehow can be consider as shady action done by them or other casino. KYC is controversial topic and there are some new casino owners take advantage on situation and we know how it end up from some people believe on the words they say.  Maybe for new casino they should be honest regarding on KYC since at current situation where regulation implemented on some casinos for sure this will be ask especially if they ask to get some licenses to make their casino legitimate to people looking at it and also to government regulating some financial platforms.

We know that crypto people would really be always prefer on having that no kyc platform but since this platforms or business does involved huge money then expect that regulations would really be next in line.
Also there are really people who do really mind about having license because they do really see it as a proof about sites legitimacy which we know that it is a common approach but we know that licenses cant really assure out 100% security if funds are really that taken or been ran away specially here on crypto space but somehow it does have a better security compared into those who do ran off a fully anonymous platform which it does really have its cons when it comes to users funds been stored up on the said platform . This is why some people would really be preferring about being regulated or centralized rather than being not.
Making out with those false claims specially on start up is really not something that good because once people or the community would really be having that kind of impression that been mold up
then sooner or later your platform or company would really be leaving no people been playing around because of the thing you had done earlier. When trust been broken then its not
something that could be taken it back.

At first being anonymous to anyone has been introduce by crypto on any platforms but since this industry became big and crypto platforms need to follow the government order regarding on regulation then those reputable platform would really implement this KYC submission. Although there are other may don't like this but for the sake of being regulated by the law they should comply to the requirements asked. That's why its up to us to at least check the reputation of the casino so that we will not put at risk ourselves to any random or new platform asking this KYC requirements. Also we need to check if those casino claiming that they will not require KYC is really not implementing that, since for sure we might get a serious problem if the casino is just fooling us by using that word.

[Dunamisx]

        I think the other casinos mentioned seem to require KYC. Well, it seems that not all of them are legitimate without KYC; maybe at the beginning of the registration they don't have KYC, but later it is possible that the casino platform will demand KYC from their gamblers.

If a casino is not requesting for kyc is not the conclusion that they will not make such demands later as long as they are not a no KYC casino, sometimes they make it appears more easy for their users to only have better experience to sign in their portal for registration without requesting them of any thing of such, but if we think on our own self that we don't really want a KYC casino, then we shouldn't use anyone of such and look after the ones that are not KYC casinos

        So further research is still needed to identify if it is true that the platform mentioned is 100% no-kyc. And there's nothing wrong with investigating and learning to read the TOS of each casino you'll be playing at first.

That's true, how often do we make research on these gambling platforms to know their category they belong if kyc or no kyc casino.

[goldkingcoiner]

It's such a pain, isn’t it? Every casino, in my opinion, should be completely transparent about their KYC. It's unfair to keep players in the dark and then reveal the information when they try to make a withdrawal. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I see such practices.

It's a bad practice and is harmful for a casino reputation. They must have term in their Terms of Service for KYC, is it mandatory, is it additional requirement only when something is detected by the casino. The second term is vague and if a casino has it in their Terms of Service, I have to ask my self that do I agree to do KYC? If I am ready to do this, I would prefer to do this after registering my account and don't wait for a KYC card pulling by the casino to submit KYC documents.

I agree with you that it's best to take care of the KYC stuff up front. This way, I don't have any surprises later on. I understand the inconvenience, but the benefits to my sanity are well worth it. I think it's critical that we, as players, insist on honesty and fair play from online casino

I agree with you too and want to do the same. I only deposit money after I successfully KYC and I am sure that I will not have issue with KYC later.

If you do not do the KYC upfront then you have only yourself to blame.

We already know every online gambling casinos attitude towards KYC. Sooner or later everyone will have to undergo it and then there could be bad surprises ahead. Before anyone even thinks of depositing money on a casino wallet, they should definitely first make sure their KYC procedure is complete and green lighted by the casino. That way, you also have the reassurance that there will not be any problems concerning KYC in the future.

Seems most logical to me, even though personally, I hate the concept of KYC. I do not feel safe giving strangers my government-issued documents.

[delfastTions]

Wait, was the OP edited? Because I'm quite surprised that, with a number of discussions about No KYC casinos, I finally found one named 'NO KYC.' But can the casino really stand by their promise?

I presume that when they say 'no KYC,' KYC should not be implemented no matter what. I would now like to know about the legality of a certain casino because I know that regulated casinos do not allow no KYC practices.

I think that potentially, businessmen who organize a casino and the operation of this casino in practice always know very well that they will definitely carry out identity verification checks according to the KYC procedure.  And in order to preserve their business, they will also be required to constantly monitor the flow of cryptocurrency by introducing mandatory verification using AML. 
however, such casino managers often instruct marketing services not to indicate too clearly and openly that the player will have to undergo KYC, and even more so if he wins.  This question can be formulated and stated in such a way, for example, even in the ToS, that the player will think that he can safely play in this casino and no one will   want to know his identity and he will calmly receive his winnings without any KYC.  And of course, advertising such as the absence of KYC works great and the number of players in such a casino is growing.  But at some moment, completely unexpected for you, the support of such a casino will inform you that they are forced to carry out KYC right now, because this is a legal requirement.  But supposedly just yesterday it was possible without KYC.  This is of course an outright lie. 
So you should always take into account that when playing in a casino, if you win, you will still have to provide your verification data.

Usually, the casinos, especially the new ones will try to implement such promotions whereby they can gather more customer's and No KYC is one card that get most attraction.
When you tell someone that you can gamble without KYC, he / she will get immediately attracted to it.  That is why we find new casino having this "No KYC" label.

However, it is seem often that as long as you are depositing, playing and losing at these casino, you are good to go but if you win anything big and try to withdraw, then suddenly all the legalizations and complications come into play and you will find your account freeze or close. That is a reason No KYC casino are mostly risky to play.

Severral years ago, when there were no KYC procedures at all in payments using cryptocurrency and  the principle of anonymity for the ownership of cryptocurrencies was generally observed, which is actually the fundamental principle of the entire invention of Satoshi Nakamoto, it was fashionable to play quite confidently in a casino that declared “No KYC”.  Now this slogan really does not mean at all that under no circumstances will the casino administration require you to verify your identity.  Rather, on the contrary, under various pretexts, in the eve nt of a big win, you will have to provide your personal data even to a casino that promised “NO KYC”.  Well, the legislation of many states now requires everyone who pays money to ordinary people, in this case, gamblers, to provide personal information about who respectively receives this money.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip~

I think something, always when things are transparent things should be done like a casino apart from reading the Tos, which is something annoying and slow, because it is an imperative duty, these things should not be left lightly, we as well Players must set an example, now having said this, 'for me one thing is certain, every time we enter a casino we always check what the KYC is like, there is no other way but to see what it is about, first because things They must be made from a casino and taken into consideration, I have taken as a forecast that if I am interested in a casino, I would prefer to do the KYC first, and see to what extent that KYC helps me to make a withdrawal, because as they have said, the casinos have different levels of KYC, I imagine it is a couple of minutes, so for me this should go as the first option before making any deposit, but I have already taken that option if I am really interested in a casino, because then going through the terrible moment that sometimes At the time of withdrawal, do they ask me for a KYC? It is something that I would not like to happen, however I am one of the people who accept that the new regulations ask or require KYC, I was reading somewhere that there are casinos that sometimes do not say it at once, but that each KYC is done as an additional condition, or a very hidden term there, then it doesn't seem fair to me.

Each casino has its own style, so when there are these types of things that are so flashy and so delicate, I have read in the forum in many threads where there are many users who feel deceived, because they are usually told in the casinos at the time of register that they do not need KYC, but at the time of withdrawal if they require it, then they are told that only some users require KYC, it is like politics, something like that, then when things are widely demonstrated that it is necessary a KYC, false advertising is not good, because later it is much more difficult to do it.

It's such a pain, isn’t it? Every casino, in my opinion, should be completely transparent about their KYC. It's unfair to keep players in the dark and then reveal the information when they try to make a withdrawal. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I see such practices. I agree with you that it's best to take care of the KYC stuff up front. This way, I don't have any surprises later on. I understand the inconvenience, but the benefits to my sanity are well worth it. I think it's critical that we, as players, insist on honesty and fair play from online casino

The KYC process will always be annoying from the beginning or any other time. 'but I think that to make it smoother, without any type of adjustments and improve from the beginning, of course, this for the casinos that we have previously put as the best for that, without emago I am one of those who think that when it's time Doing a KYC should be done with the maximum number of documents we have, because it is not known when we have to make a withdrawal of any type, it is better to do it with the greatest number of coupons, if you win big then you can withdraw big , we can never stop thinking about the good possibilities, we are notorious players who at any time can count on a good touch of luck and that can make the difference, and I only recommend doing the KYC for our favorite sites, not for everyone because for Not all of them are worth it , because we do not know the scope of them It is to make the entire process better.

When we are in a casino we must know how to choose the best one so that it adapts to our taste. I have always said that the Best casinos are the old ones because they have gone through processes that are quite large, trustworthy, have a high reputation and have a lot of knowledge about The players , of course that includes the processes that are quite strong, have already overcome some risks of being hacked and all that weighs, because I am not going to trust a new casino, where I don't even know what the limits of their security are and how good they are with the custody of the funds , because very well there could be a new casino and then they hack it and they say that it was not their fault and that Everything was stolen from them , since they do not have the capacity to answer for the stolen funds, since it is something that they They can argue , then in that order of ideas things can go like this, and what happens ? who is blamed ? They can have all the funds , and Things can Still go to nothing.

[NoToKYC]

There have been added a few new casinos, more other crypto sites for earning crypto or booking of trips paying via Crypto and also another exclusive bonus

[NoToKYC]

A new tutorial was published: how to earn crypto

[delfastTions]

The KYC process will always be annoying from the beginning or any other time.
~~~~~~

That's it for sure! 
The fact of the matter is that when you are required to undergo the KYC procedure, it is always annoying and it always takes time, and often all sorts of nuances arise with this very check.  Just look at all the searching around the house or in your pockets for the necessary documents, then these stupid photographs with dates written on a piece of paper, or with documents next to your face.  All this is quite disgusting and humiliating for any normal person.  So I am not a supporter of such advance verification under the KYC procedure..  If there is at least some opportunity to avoid it, then you should do it and not waste time on all this nonsense.  And in general, it’s disgusting that all these KYC requirements when using crypto-currency payments are being imposed by casinos more and more and, accordingly, regulators in an increasing number of countries are introducing such rules. 

This will simply spoil and disavow the very meaning of anonymous payments, for which cryptocurrencies were invented.

[LUCKMCFLY]

The KYC process will always be annoying from the beginning or any other time.
~~~~~~

That's it for sure! 
The fact of the matter is that when you are required to undergo the KYC procedure, it is always annoying and it always takes time, and often all sorts of nuances arise with this very check.  Just look at all the searching around the house or in your pockets for the necessary documents, then these stupid photographs with dates written on a piece of paper, or with documents next to your face.  All this is quite disgusting and humiliating for any normal person.  So I am not a supporter of such advance verification under the KYC procedure..  If there is at least some opportunity to avoid it, then you should do it and not waste time on all this nonsense.  And in general, it’s disgusting that all these KYC requirements when using crypto-currency payments are being imposed by casinos more and more and, accordingly, regulators in an increasing number of countries are introducing such rules. 

This will simply spoil and disavow the very meaning of anonymous payments, for which cryptocurrencies were invented.

Yes, you are right, in fact when it comes to how to have a better Sense of things without KYC as it was a few years ago, things worked much better, people did their Business in the casinos , they played calmly and did not There was no type of proof that could be associated with people , in fact I am one of those who think that even the casinos had more Players , because Now with the KYC thing they could have fired many to not Comply with this requirement that is below normal, where they should never ask for it under any type of criteria, of course when we make a small sketch of the cases, that some casinos steal them, and that many of those who promote KYC say and notice that things must be like this because in a case of robbery from a casino, they help them recover the sperosans funds, that is the vikl and vulgar lie that you can tell, it is like that Which is asked so that others can generate more possibilities than the people join the KYC and that it is something safe, or that they look at it so that it is something safe, in fact there are players who believe it, which at least makes no sense, because only the person's money is enough to that they return the Gifts they have designated there, then these things cannot be Considered a matter of atracting Players and people.

If people want to believe that KYC is for greater security or something like that, you cannot be so ignorant and naive in life, because life will cost you more , it is Something that Cannot happen because ignoring things as they are becomes a problem. In the worst mistake that we can make, and that is something that at the end of the day includes money, and the money does not want to say or they are going to recover, if there is a hack or something like that, that money is the Same if it does not have enough money, Well, they lose it and that is something that has to be seen as Equal.

[mirakal]

If people want to believe that KYC is for greater security or something like that, you cannot be so ignorant and naive in life, ...

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

Now, let's consider the scenario where a site is not regulated, and users are anonymous. If, unfortunately, there's an inside job, and the regulators find out that the owners stole users' funds, there could be serious consequences. In such cases, the regulators might investigate and, if necessary, shut down the casino. They would then work to distribute any remaining balances to the users.

However, the distribution of funds will likely involve a legal process. It's highly improbable that these funds would be sent to unknown accounts. Regulators would typically have reporting obligations and a proper framework for returning the funds to their rightful owners. But, as you rightly pointed out, the risk lies in unregulated platforms. If they are seized by authorities, the process could be less transparent and the funds might end up in government treasuries as unclaimed funds.

[348Judah]

Base on what the people want, there's more bids for a no KYC casino than the ones requesting for such, many have now realized that they needed time to make this discovery in other to save them from future surprises with KYC issues, maybe we should also assume that a few numbers of gamblers aren't aware of it that kyc is something they needed to tackle right from the beginning, if you can't go by providing the required informations, then abstain from using a kyc gambling casino and for the ones that doesn't support for the use of kyc.

[dwyane36]

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

As for me, the main problem with the KYC requirements both at gambling sites and centralized exchanges is that it is not known how exactly and for what purpose the personal data of users are used. I mean that if you give your personal data to any company, you shouldn't be surprised that your data can be stolen and used by malicious people at any time. Unfortunately, there have been many such cases in the crypto industry.

[mirakal]

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

As for me, the main problem with the KYC requirements both at gambling sites and centralized exchanges is that it is not known how exactly and for what purpose the personal data of users are used. I mean that if you give your personal data to any company, you shouldn't be surprised that your data can be stolen and used by malicious people at any time. Unfortunately, there have been many such cases in the crypto industry.

That's a concern for many gamblers. But the question is, can we avoid the KYC requirement when it's mandated by the regulators for gambling sites? It seems like we have no choice here. The options are clear: either the gambling site implements the KYC policy and continues to operate, or they choose not to implement it, risking the cessation of their business.

As gamblers, we're left with little choice in this matter. If we want to gamble, we have to comply with KYC, and that's the unfortunate reality.

While there's a concern that our identity might be stolen, it's crucial to remember that the responsibility for protecting our information lies with the gambling sites. Regulators could penalize them if such breaches occur. However, as gamblers, we're well aware that sharing our KYC information carries potential risks, and we accept that risk when we sign up.

[LUCKMCFLY]

If people want to believe that KYC is for greater security or something like that, you cannot be so ignorant and naive in life, ...

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

Now, let's consider the scenario where a site is not regulated, and users are anonymous. If, unfortunately, there's an inside job, and the regulators find out that the owners stole users' funds, there could be serious consequences. In such cases, the regulators might investigate and, if necessary, shut down the casino. They would then work to distribute any remaining balances to the users.

However, the distribution of funds will likely involve a legal process. It's highly improbable that these funds would be sent to unknown accounts. Regulators would typically have reporting obligations and a proper framework for returning the funds to their rightful owners. But, as you rightly pointed out, the risk lies in unregulated platforms. If they are seized by authorities, the process could be less transparent and the funds might end up in government treasuries as unclaimed funds.

But before things worked well, when we register in a place , we have an ID which is enough to serve people, and now with all this KYC it doesn't seem to you that it is the same but disguised with the option of That governments at one point can extort casinos and force them to give them all their data or else take away their licenses to operate there? At least it has become clear to me that in Biannce things are like that, and that is in very bad taste, so it may be that your arguments are very good, and in fact they sound Excellent , but I am one of those who do not believe in those things, I don't often believe in what they say on the news or something, we always have to consider that they hurt us or try to manipulate us so that they can do things as they wan t, so it's easy for them to do many things, I don't approve of it being possible that a KYC will get you something good, because I see that as a pure fairy tale, if I am an average player, I am not a player who has a lot of money in a casino and it seems bad to me, now imagine what a player can think Whale?

I think whale players don't like this option at all, even though things for them mean more security, I'm sure they don't like it, because whales have to comply with a lot of KYC things , Unless you're In a very cheap casino like stake.com, there are actually many whales who feel comfortable with the sites, so in these types of things we must be very cautious, to comply with KYC is what I say, being in a casino because Be totally trustworthy to people and not wait for things to go Wrong , so as a player you should always feel comfortable with what you have, where you are playing and what you can achieve when based on any casino, that's why a good casino , that is where one must accept the KYC completely.

[JungleCasino]

Your Request Linsting doesnt work

[libert19]

Your Request Linsting doesnt work

It works for me.

[delfastTions]

In my opinion, KYC requirements in regulated gambling sites can be viewed from a security perspective. When we gamble on a site that is regulated, it often means the operators need to adhere to certain security and transparency standards. These standards include verifying the identities of their users to prevent fraudulent activities.

As for me, the main problem with the KYC requirements both at gambling sites and centralized exchanges is that it is not known how exactly and for what purpose the personal data of users are used. I mean that if you give your personal data to any company, you shouldn't be surprised that your data can be stolen and used by malicious people at any time. Unfortunately, there have been many such cases in the crypto industry.

This is exactly the reason to refuse to play in this casino due to the fact that you are required to introduce yourself and undergo a KYC check, and the player himself is afraid that his personal data will eventually be stolen and can be used by some people unknown to him for various purposes . 
And the purposes of this use can indeed be simply harmless, such as targeted advertising for gambling business or new casinos. 
And also, if this data somehow got into the hands of criminals, then the purposes of their use may be of a criminal nature, even to the point of some kind of action similar to extortion or even blackmail. 
Since quite a lot of people in the world are really afraid of such contacts with people they don’t know, many don’t want to go through the KYC procedure.  And such people need to be understood and, in general, they should not be deprived of the opportunity to gamble anonymously.  Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

[NoToKYC]

Get free exclusive bonuses by clicking on the shaking giftbox.

[3kpk3]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

[arwin100]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

But unfortunately some regulator became more strict since this platform has been used by money launderers and other criminals, so maybe this is one added reason on why they implement this KYC to casinos so that they or even the platform could verify easily if their user is not doing any shady activity while using their casino. I also support this no KYC on reputable platform but for now there's none of them offering this so we will really get force to submit this requirements so that we can play, but for other who's so skeptical and can't trust those platform asking that maybe they should find newly launch casino since most of them offering this No KYC thing but the risk is so high knowing that we don't know if we can totally trust them.

[Doan9269]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

But unfortunately some regulator became more strict since this platform has been used by money launderers and other criminals, so maybe this is one added reason on why they implement this KYC to casinos so that they or even the platform could verify easily if their user is not doing any shady activity while using their casino. I also support this no KYC on reputable platform but for now there's none of them offering this so we will really get force to submit this requirements so that we can play, but for other who's so skeptical and can't trust those platform asking that maybe they should find newly launch casino since most of them offering this No KYC thing but the risk is so high knowing that we don't know if we can totally trust them.

There have been alot on gamblers mind concerning the KYC challenges they face in using a casino, despite this they cannot hold their peace without using them because they get some of the things they wanted from using them, truly said that there are no KYC casino and this categories are also another different ones that they will have to research about them and know how reputable they are before using them, I will just advise here that we shouldn't start what we may be unable to complete when choosing between a KYC gambling platform and a casino that does not require KYC.

[NoToKYC]

Get free best casino bonuses by clicking on the shaking giftbox

[delfastTions]

There have been alot on gamblers mind concerning the KYC challenges they face in using a casino, despite this they cannot hold their peace without using them because they get some of the things they wanted from using them, truly said that there are no KYC casino and this categories are also another different ones that they will have to research about them and know how reputable they are before using them, I will just advise here that we shouldn't start what we may be unable to complete when choosing between a KYC gambling platform and a casino that does not require KYC.

Lately, the same thought keeps coming to me: all cryptocurrency lovers are becoming more and more accustomed to constantlyi undergoing KYC checks and do not really think about the fact that their personal data has long been known in casinos and banks and in authorized  control of the income and finances of citizens by government agencies and, in general, due to the constant theft of databases of personal information from unreliable sites, for example some crypto-casinos, all this data practically ends up in the public domain on the Internet. 
So it’s obvious that this is bad.  And it turns out that by prohibiting the use of a casino by a completely anonymous player, who under no circumstances will disclose his personal data to the casino, violates the fundamental principle of competitive trade in services - the principle of the best satisfaction of the player as a consumer of the services of this casino.  And in this sense, there is a clear violation of consumer rights.  Still, I believe that something needs to be done with the process of widespread and mandatory introduction of KYC and really defend an autonomous group of crypto casinos that are guaranteed not to require KYC from players under any circumstances.  This, of course, is almost impossible now due to the requirements of various regulators, but it is extremely important from the point of view of eliminating an obvious violation of consumer rights. 
I hope that with the passage of time and the further development of the crypto casino sector, based on the interests of anonymous players, this issue will finally be resolved.

[kotajikikox]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

But unfortunately some regulator became more strict since this platform has been used by money launderers and other criminals, so maybe this is one added reason on why they implement this KYC to casinos so that they or even the platform could verify easily if their user is not doing any shady activity while using their casino. I also support this no KYC on reputable platform but for now there's none of them offering this so we will really get force to submit this requirements so that we can play, but for other who's so skeptical and can't trust those platform asking that maybe they should find newly launch casino since most of them offering this No KYC thing but the risk is so high knowing that we don't know if we can totally trust them.

There have been alot on gamblers mind concerning the KYC challenges they face in using a casino, despite this they cannot hold their peace without using them because they get some of the things they wanted from using them, truly said that there are no KYC casino and this categories are also another different ones that they will have to research about them and know how reputable they are before using them, I will just advise here that we shouldn't start what we may be unable to complete when choosing between a KYC gambling platform and a casino that does not require KYC.

some promises to have NO KYC but if you go deeper it is also written that "If they found your activities suspicious" then they have the rights to ask for KYC lol.

also correct that those no kyc site are getting lower nowadays because some casino that I use to play that does not ask for KYC in the beginning (Like Roobet and Duelbits in the past) but now they need to comply with government regulation and that is to prevent accounts from Money Laundering so need a account verification.

[Shamm]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

But unfortunately some regulator became more strict since this platform has been used by money launderers and other criminals, so maybe this is one added reason on why they implement this KYC to casinos so that they or even the platform could verify easily if their user is not doing any shady activity while using their casino. I also support this no KYC on reputable platform but for now there's none of them offering this so we will really get force to submit this requirements so that we can play, but for other who's so skeptical and can't trust those platform asking that maybe they should find newly launch casino since most of them offering this No KYC thing but the risk is so high knowing that we don't know if we can totally trust them.

There have been alot on gamblers mind concerning the KYC challenges they face in using a casino, despite this they cannot hold their peace without using them because they get some of the things they wanted from using them, truly said that there are no KYC casino and this categories are also another different ones that they will have to research about them and know how reputable they are before using them, I will just advise here that we shouldn't start what we may be unable to complete when choosing between a KYC gambling platform and a casino that does not require KYC.

some promises to have NO KYC but if you go deeper it is also written that "If they found your activities suspicious" then they have the rights to ask for KYC lol.

also correct that those no kyc site are getting lower nowadays because some casino that I use to play that does not ask for KYC in the beginning (Like Roobet and Duelbits in the past) but now they need to comply with government regulation and that is to prevent accounts from Money Laundering so need a account verification.

Yes these are the tricks of some casinos out here which they are advertising that they don't have any KYC in thier casino and once a gambler fall in To that trap and play in thier game then after a few play and want to withdraw thier winning profits then they will ask for KYC which pretty bad cause in thier advertisement they don't ask KYC, anyways there are some casino who are trusted enough and the you can play and withdraw without a problem but once your account being suspected then for sure your withdrawal will be on hold.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Therefore, individual and even fairly well-known casinos should not introduce mandatory KYC verification and even tryy to change jurisdictions in order to preserve the opportunity for anonymous players to also play.
 I hope that some small country or territory will eventually make local laws that will allow casinos not to require KYC from players.  That would be right and great.

I support whatever you stated, but I am afraid the reality is that more and more crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in some way or another despite some of them advertising no-KYC based on my research.

There will always be some sites that will never request any form of KYC, but their numbers are shrinking with time sadly.

But unfortunately some regulator became more strict since this platform has been used by money launderers and other criminals, so maybe this is one added reason on why they implement this KYC to casinos so that they or even the platform could verify easily if their user is not doing any shady activity while using their casino. I also support this no KYC on reputable platform but for now there's none of them offering this so we will really get force to submit this requirements so that we can play, but for other who's so skeptical and can't trust those platform asking that maybe they should find newly launch casino since most of them offering this No KYC thing but the risk is so high knowing that we don't know if we can totally trust them.

There have been alot on gamblers mind concerning the KYC challenges they face in using a casino, despite this they cannot hold their peace without using them because they get some of the things they wanted from using them, truly said that there are no KYC casino and this categories are also another different ones that they will have to research about them and know how reputable they are before using them, I will just advise here that we shouldn't start what we may be unable to complete when choosing between a KYC gambling platform and a casino that does not require KYC.

Well I have always thought that all of us as Players Always Want to be good in Some way that is Not or that involves leaving the KYC because basically the casinos with KYC are very annoying when it comes to them, not only Because of that but also because the eoprsoans do not You like to leave your data there, it is something that can be annoying and dangerous at the same time, although the most trusted part of the forum is where I have risked Leaving my KYC, but it is only because they are casinos that have a very good Reputation and therefore That is that I have left my KYC , of course it is my personal decision, I do not urge andie to follow what I do, I only stop leaving what I have done as if it is possible to Trust , as long as taking into Consideration that things They can change a lot, with respect to casinos they Can be Hacked or violated, but what is important is That they know how to take care of themselves , Defend themselves without Compromising our Data Or compromising our Balance. thus, that is where You see how efficient a casino can be.

When trying to do Different things in a Casino One can Consider that if You Want to have casino without KYC it is a total challenge, there are none, the casino that was most established Without KYC was freebitco.in but at some point things can be Different because they already have KYC requirements, and that is Something that disappointed Many , but Considering that it is a CasinCo, a site so reliable and so many Years old , since it is considered leaving the KYC without any problem, the biggest problem is when there is a There is a Relatively new casino and Leaving the KYC there is something that can be very Dangerous, because they are new casinos, we do not know how they come, if they are honest , trustworthy , that is What I have seen that can be Done, of course because the New is always be Careful, not all Casinos are bad , nor do they Intend to scam, but it is good to always be alert and Distrustful, so in this other way of teaching it is What they say that you Should be very Careful.

[gunhell16]

I think, OP, you have a lot to do to edit the casinos you mentioned, because most of the listed casinos you say don't have KYC rules are the opposite of the truth, dude.

Though there are even other scams that you went with that also have high-issue problems, Just revise it a little to make it clear and proper to the many who will look and read here in providing the information that you have shared with us here in this forum.

[danadc]

I think, OP, you have a lot to do to edit the casinos you mentioned, because most of the listed casinos you say don't have KYC rules are the opposite of the truth, dude.

Though there are even other scams that you went with that also have high-issue problems, Just revise it a little to make it clear and proper to the many who will look and read here in providing the information that you have shared with us here in this forum.

That's what I think, there are many casinos that I have never seen in my life , and they don't seem trustworthy to me, I don't know how they managed to extract those casinos or what their intentions are, but it caught my attention because a casino that doesn't require KYC is something interesting, and what I imagine is that for there to be one like this there must have quite a few things to do, such as the lack of licenses and this causes a lot of distrust in the players, I think that those new casinos that come out will be without KYC and those that can monopolize attention and clients and be honest, I don't know how they can do it, but it is possible.

Casinos that are decentralized do not seem good to me, they are different in everything, in how they are managed and the internal environment, and the problem with decentralized casinos is the support, yes it is a problem with centralized casinos, because they use AI a lot, A decentralized channel could be more problematic, but that's the way I would trust them is if they were here on the forum with a thread Ann and with the positive comments from the ommunity.

[redsun114]

I see BCGame in your list of casinos on the website. They DO require KYC and I was forced to submit as the funds were kept hostage until I provided it so not sure how you call them a NO-KYC casino.

I truly appreciate your effort to find such casinos because I do like to gamble anonymously but man it's really hard to find such casinos these days, so your efforts deserve much appreciations. Most of the casinos listed are new or I never heard about them, so "NO-KYC" perhaps comes at an added risk of losing your bankroll to a well planned scam. Still, it must be a good initiative and I will bookmark your site .

[Agbe]

I see BCGame in your list of casinos on the website. They DO require KYC and I was forced to submit as the funds were kept hostage until I provided it so not sure how you call them a NO-KYC casino.

I truly appreciate your effort to find such casinos because I do like to gamble anonymously but man it's really hard to find such casinos these days, so your efforts deserve much appreciations. Most of the casinos listed are new or I never heard about them, so "NO-KYC" perhaps comes at an added risk of losing your bankroll to a well planned scam. Still, it must be a good initiative and I will bookmark your site .

Though I am not a serious gambler but in few cases I can visit the site to have fun some and left. No casino is meant it in that way in the recent time. Almost all the casinos in the present days ask for KYC from one way or another either directly or indirectly. I don't normally believed those casinos that say, they are not offering KYC because at the end when a gambler win big and wants to withdraw then drama upon drama will display. Normally if a casino is offering a KYC then they should not asked for even an email for the registration because the email address is part of the KYC. Any casino that is asking for the full name of the play has already bridge the no KYC policy.

[Dunamisx]

I think, OP, you have a lot to do to edit the casinos you mentioned, because most of the listed casinos you say don't have KYC rules are the opposite of the truth, dude.

Though there are even other scams that you went with that also have high-issue problems, Just revise it a little to make it clear and proper to the many who will look and read here in providing the information that you have shared with us here in this forum.

We almost know what we want, even though there are many offers from people concerning their no KYC casino list, we can use our own personal abilities to descern them from which are not, gambling is made easy now because you can always make you of the opportunity to search for your desired casino from the list of the available ones and check through their various requirements concerning KYC, if you're ok with them, then you can proceed, if you aren't, then you can continue your search.

[dewez]

Hey there- I tried your Request Listing on your list but it's throwing an AJAX error when trying to submit.
Anyway, I would like to get l0tt0.com listed on your site. It would be a Level 0 on your scale.

Thanks so much

Josh

[delfastTions]

I think, OP, you have a lot to do to edit the casinos you mentioned, because most of the listed casinos you say don't have KYC rules are the opposite of the truth, dude.

Though there are even other scams that you went with that also have high-issue problems, Just revise it a little to make it clear and proper to the many who will look and read here in providing the information that you have shared with us here in this forum.

We almost know what we want, even though there are many offers from people concerning their no KYC casino list, we can use our own personal abilities to descern them from which are not, gambling is made easy now because you can always make you of the opportunity to search for your desired casino from the list of the available ones and check through their various requirements concerning KYC, if you're ok with them, then you can proceed, if you aren't, then you can continue your search.

When we generally evaluate issues such as the KYC requirement, it would be worth considering that the identity verification itself under the KYC procedure differs quite significantly in terms of the set of requirements for providing photographs of documents or a person.  Or sometimes photographs with a document at the same time.  Sometimes you may be asked to send a video image as well. 
This is usually called strict KYC or KYC by simplest procedure. 
And there are situations when it is important for a player to know whether or not the casino will impose a requirement on him to undergo strict KYC.  Or you can play after going through KYC according to a simplified procedure and not worry about the money on your deposit and the possibility of withdrawing the money you win to your account.  But such data is quite difficult to collect and, moreover, the casino may change it from time to time.  So, in the end, the list of casinos without KYC, or with simplified KYC, or, finally, strict KYC must be updated quite often.  Simply also because the number of casinos with KYC is constantly increasing, and vice versa, the number of casinos without KYC is constantly decreasing.
 Its just that they are all afraid of regulators and comply with requirements that practically destroy the anonymity of players.  This is sad.

[Dunamisx]

I think, OP, you have a lot to do to edit the casinos you mentioned, because most of the listed casinos you say don't have KYC rules are the opposite of the truth, dude.

Though there are even other scams that you went with that also have high-issue problems, Just revise it a little to make it clear and proper to the many who will look and read here in providing the information that you have shared with us here in this forum.

We almost know what we want, even though there are many offers from people concerning their no KYC casino list, we can use our own personal abilities to descern them from which are not, gambling is made easy now because you can always make you of the opportunity to search for your desired casino from the list of the available ones and check through their various requirements concerning KYC, if you're ok with them, then you can proceed, if you aren't, then you can continue your search.

When we generally evaluate issues such as the KYC requirement, it would be worth considering that the identity verification itself under the KYC procedure differs quite significantly in terms of the set of requirements for providing photographs of documents or a person.  Or sometimes photographs with a document at the same time.  Sometimes you may be asked to send a video image as well. 
This is usually called strict KYC or KYC by simplest procedure. 
And there are situations when it is important for a player to know whether or not the casino will impose a requirement on him to undergo strict KYC.  Or you can play after going through KYC according to a simplified procedure and not worry about the money on your deposit and the possibility of withdrawing the money you win to your account.  But such data is quite difficult to collect and, moreover, the casino may change it from time to time.  So, in the end, the list of casinos without KYC, or with simplified KYC, or, finally, strict KYC must be updated quite often.  Simply also because the number of casinos with KYC is constantly increasing, and vice versa, the number of casinos without KYC is constantly decreasing.
 Its just that they are all afraid of regulators and comply with requirements that practically destroy the anonymity of players.  This is sad.

That's right, there are different levels of KYC requirements and it also depends on the kind of casino or gambling platform involved, we must make sure to know the way each gambling casinos operate and what they request from their gamblers, by now i don't expect that we often have challenges in giving KYC information requirements since we are the ones in charge of what we need the KYC for, it's our account and the informations needed are also coming from us, this should be the simplest to do but many worries alot whenever it's all about KYC.

[delfastTions]

I think, OP, you have a lot to do to edit the casinos you mentioned, because most of the listed casinos you say don't have KYC rules are the opposite of the truth, dude.

Though there are even other scams that you went with that also have high-issue problems, Just revise it a little to make it clear and proper to the many who will look and read here in providing the information that you have shared with us here in this forum.

We almost know what we want, even though there are many offers from people concerning their no KYC casino list, we can use our own personal abilities to descern them from which are not, gambling is made easy now because you can always make you of the opportunity to search for your desired casino from the list of the available ones and check through their various requirements concerning KYC, if you're ok with them, then you can proceed, if you aren't, then you can continue your search.

When we generally evaluate issues such as the KYC requirement, it would be worth considering that the identity verification itself under the KYC procedure differs quite significantly in terms of the set of requirements for providing photographs of documents or a person.  Or sometimes photographs with a document at the same time.  Sometimes you may be asked to send a video image as well. 
This is usually called strict KYC or KYC by simplest procedure. 
And there are situations when it is important for a player to know whether or not the casino will impose a requirement on him to undergo strict KYC.  Or you can play after going through KYC according to a simplified procedure and not worry about the money on your deposit and the possibility of withdrawing the money you win to your account.  But such data is quite difficult to collect and, moreover, the casino may change it from time to time.  So, in the end, the list of casinos without KYC, or with simplified KYC, or, finally, strict KYC must be updated quite often.  Simply also because the number of casinos with KYC is constantly increasing, and vice versa, the number of casinos without KYC is constantly decreasing.
 Its just that they are all afraid of regulators and comply with requirements that practically destroy the anonymity of players.  This is sad.

That's right, there are different levels of KYC requirements and it also depends on the kind of casino or gambling platform involved, we must make sure to know the way each gambling casinos operate and what they request from their gamblers, by now i don't expect that we often have challenges in giving KYC information requirements since we are the ones in charge of what we need the KYC for, it's our account and the informations needed are also coming from us, this should be the simplest to do but many worries alot whenever it's all about KYC.

And by the way, there is good reason to worry, I think so. 
First of all, you don’t know in advance how confidential personal information about you will remain in casino client databases.  But these bath databases can be stolen or hacked by hackers.  And information about you, including information about where you are physically located, becomes practically public.  I see a great danger in this.  And perhaps players should not immediately send photos or scans of their documents wherever KYC is mentioned.  And it’s not for nothing that the market for rendering fake documents in the form of files for KYC has become quite developed.  Many players still want to play in different ways without problems and remain anonymous.

 I'm not even talking about countries where gambling is generally punishable by the laws of these countries.  There, the issue of anonymity is generally extremely important.

[peter0425]

- KYC Level:We prioritize  low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.

while you claim to be a NO KYC site , yet it is clear in your  thread that there is still a chance of you to seek for KYC though it is considered a LOW or NO , is this how you wanna trap your players?
when you say NO KYC you must be clear about No at all and not that you will hide for some small Word that can bring conflict once there is something you wanted to hold from their accounts and funds.

[blckhawk]

Are these listed crypto casinos and websites a safe one though? Because a lot of scam casinos are not also offering KYC but at the end, they hold the funds of the people that are playing in their casinos and claim that they did not comply with KYC or that they found the withdrawal suspicious so I have to ask that one, I hope you don't mind OP.

[Elpeor00]

First thing first; I call bullshit on the AI thing, OP has already declared that "the KYC levels are determined together with the casino." Of course it also means a reviewed casino can ask him to rate it as 0 KYC if they are "compelling" enough

On the other hand, according to the site's KYC level explanation some of the reviewed casinos, like Betplay or JackBit should be awarded a KYC level of 1 or 2 rather than 0, as you can see in this image



Anyway, the idea is great, just by looking at this thread we can see the demand a service like kycnot.me focused in gambling sites and related services will meet, too bad the execution was so poor.

Maybe the community can do better (and yes, we totally should try)

[LUCKMCFLY]

Complying with the KYC Requirements in these countries is Currently the most normal thing in the world, but of course, it may be normal for some but it is not relevant or feasible for others, the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible, which I don't see well, because I know that privacy for some is very necessary , for KYC verifications in any casino, they can't do it have a very bad time, therefore every time we do a KYC, sometimes if the casino wants to give us a bad time, they will start bothering us even more by Demanding more Documents so that the retests cannot be done, and while we wait,  well The player gets sick, starts playing and is likely to lose everything, it is one of the things that some people do, but what they do not measure is that they can lose their clients if they do it that way , Because I am one, that if I They treat you badly in one place , I won't come back Again.

The people who don't have Problems with the Verification on the KYC sites , well, I Wish them the best, for me that in the future there will be casinos that do not need to have KYC verification, I don't know, maybe those casinos will come out without needing to have Licenses , or Something that regulates them , because Obviously the eproans here require that the casinos are legal and registered in the corresponding entities, but thanks to those Records they are the ones that will Always adhere to requesting this documentation, I don't know if in the future the eprsoan will no longer look for places like that but Rather those that are reliable and without licenses , Things that sound Crazy , but that can be done , and it Depends on the people that they can be done that way , if we see it that way it would be like Changing the mtnality, but it is something that Goes to extremes , but the time will come where companies no Longer want to do KYC.

[khaled0111]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

[rodskee]

This is what most of us wanted to find nowadays but sadly there are no complete
NON KYC site that in which famous in this platform because even those oldschool no kyc casino are now
turning into asking details so when i Read this part ? I know that you are promising away form what
you are truthfully doing


- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms.


How I wish you can truly compete being no kyc when nowadays that government
are going after those Decentralized platforms .

[bitterguy28]

Looking for crypto platforms without the KYC hassle? Check out NoToKYC.com.

Your gateway to no-KYC crypto casinos and exchanges. Simple, private, and efficient.
Whether you're a gambler or a trader, if you're looking for No KYC platforms, we've got you covered!

Our AI's Ranking Criteria:
- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.
- Cryptos: Platforms supporting decentralized cryptos like Bitcoin (BTC) and Monero (XMR) rank higher.
- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.
- Withdrawal Time: Instant withdrawals? Our AI approves!
- Accepted Cryptos: Diversity in crypto options fetches a higher rank.
 

How to get EXCLUSIVE BONUSES?

1. Visit No KYC Casinos
2. Click on the shaking gift box in the menu.
3. Follow the simple steps to earn spins.
4. Use your spins to unlock exclusive bonuses.

Best Crypto Casinos No Kyc Crypto Casinos Anonymous Crypto Casinos no deposit bonuses

Welcome to Bitcointalk forum , but i observed your attitude towards the forum  as wanted to ask if you are truly interested in advertising here and gain supporters and players?

your account was Created in September 5  and posted this thread at the same day  , had a couple of replies from the inquiries then stopped collaborating instead starts to post your events and cares nothing about the issues?

showing your last post as this -

Get free best casino bonuses by clicking on the shaking giftbox

so wondering if you are still wanted to earn players? because if yes then better stay not just active in being online but active in engaging .

[Dunamisx]

This is what most of us wanted to find nowadays but sadly there are no complete
NON KYC site that in which famous in this platform because even those oldschool no kyc casino are now
turning into asking details so when i Read this part ? I know that you are promising away form what
you are truthfully doing


- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms.


How I wish you can truly compete being no kyc when nowadays that government
are going after those Decentralized platforms .

Don't just get deceived, nothing like low KYC requirements or gambling platforms, it's either they are demanding for KYC or they are not, we need to properly make research about the type of gambling casino we are using, this will help us narrow our search on what we want because we cannot eat our cake and still have it, KYC is something we cannot partially fulfill it, it will requires our absolutely compliance.

[Odusko]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there were many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass KYC after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a KYC-free casino!

KYC is a mandatory requirement for regulatory compliance in centralized projects, this is why there is no centralized cryptocurrency service that doesn't demand for KYC and that is why it is most important to take note of the level of KYC demand of a project before subscribing to them, so for sure there most ve a point when the site will demand for KYC from you unlike in exchange you must pass through the KYC process before you can carry out any service on the exchange.
But in the casino, their KYC term may be lesser and you are allowed to gamble and withdraw to a limit without KYC, kyc is only demanded when there is a suspected act from the account or you want to withdraw or deposit an amount that is above the limits for non-KYC verified accounts.

[iv4n]

...

...

Don't just get deceived, nothing like low KYC requirements or gambling platforms, it's either they are demanding for KYC or they are not, we need to properly make research about the type of gambling casino we are using, this will help us narrow our search on what we want because we cannot eat our cake and still have it, KYC is something we cannot partially fulfill it, it will requires our absolutely compliance.

Well, there are still casinos where we can play without KYC, especially if we are fair players nobody will ask us for KYC. But still, KYC is increasingly present among crypto casinos, so if we plan to play, we have to be ready for KYC at some point. Those who win most of the time or those who play with big amounts will face this sooner than others, that's the fact.

The fact is that there are no guarantees, so far I didn't have to go through KYC anywhere, but that can change in a second... people should be ready for KYC if they are risking big amounts, or if they are winning big. Sad but truth...

[Noctis Connor]

This is great most of players are looking for none KYC casino, most of the casino's now are required to do some KYC because of it's registration that recquired on how they manage their money into banking system issued by their government when it's registered, this will increase your player but make sure that the withdrawals are guaranted when incomes to big winning amounts coz lots of casinos right now are questioning those big winning like mines lol.

[ultrloa]

Don't just get deceived, nothing like low KYC requirements or gambling platforms, it's either they are demanding for KYC or they are not, we need to properly make research about the type of gambling casino we are using, this will help us narrow our search on what we want because we cannot eat our cake and still have it, KYC is something we cannot partially fulfill it, it will requires our absolutely compliance.

Well, there are still casinos where we can play without KYC, especially if we are fair players nobody will ask us for KYC. But still, KYC is increasingly present among crypto casinos, so if we plan to play, we have to be ready for KYC at some point. Those who win most of the time or those who play with big amounts will face this sooner than others, that's the fact.

The fact is that there are no guarantees, so far I didn't have to go through KYC anywhere, but that can change in a second... people should be ready for KYC if they are risking big amounts, or if they are winning big. Sad but truth...

Yes there's still casino doesn't require KYC but could we really trust them? Would they really last for long time without asking that? Since government compliance is really important especially now where crypto platforms are usually regulated by government. Also we don't know if this non KYC platform could really provide if their player win some huge amount on their casino.

Also at this point I don't trust any casino saying that they are not requiring KYC since we all know here especially if they want to run a legitimate business that KYC will be one of their requirement so that they can get a license. People should need to accept that KYC is part of the process and those legitimate casino is asking that and Its better to comply with them since we can assure that we are safe rather than risking any amount on unsure casino which we don't know if they really mean what they say here or maybe trusted enough to provide some good services to their players.

[iv4n]

....

Yes there's still casino doesn't require KYC but could we really trust them? Would they really last for long time without asking that? Since government compliance is really important especially now where crypto platforms are usually regulated by government. Also we don't know if this non KYC platform could really provide if their player win some huge amount on their casino.

Also at this point I don't trust any casino saying that they are not requiring KYC since we all know here especially if they want to run a legitimate business that KYC will be one of their requirement so that they can get a license. People should need to accept that KYC is part of the process and those legitimate casino is asking that and Its better to comply with them since we can assure that we are safe rather than risking any amount on unsure casino which we don't know if they really mean what they say here or maybe trusted enough to provide some good services to their players.

Stake, BC.Games, Coins.Game, I think I can include Freebitcoin (they have some betting market), and there are some other good & old casinos that will not ask for KYC just like that. I had many deposits/withdrawals, so I can say that I trust them with my money and I am active in these casinos.

But I don't like when casinos have mandatory KYC rules and I am not playing in those casinos. Roobet is a good example, I remember when they introduced that rule, I withdrew my funds before that and I never opened their site again.

[piebeyb]

The fact is that there are no guarantees, so far I didn't have to go through KYC anywhere, but that can change in a second... people should be ready for KYC if they are risking big amounts, or if they are winning big. Sad but truth...

Yes, if you want to bet big money and win big, the casino may ask your account to complete KYC at the next level. Obviously, in my opinion, it might be difficult for anyone regarding KYC because not everyone likes it, but that's what is happening now where all users have to submit. on the regulations they have provided because they can freeze our accounts and funds in a matter of seconds.

Even though when registering they don't ask to complete KYC in full, at least being a small gambler it's easier for me to withdraw money without having to send my identity, because it's possible that if I win big things can change at any time and the casino ends up asking me to send my identity, but the point is in my opinion Don't gamble with big bets if you don't want the casino to ask for complete KYC.

[Bitinity]

Stake, BC.Games, Coins.Game, I think I can include Freebitcoin (they have some betting market), and there are some other good & old casinos that will not ask for KYC just like that. I had many deposits/withdrawals, so I can say that I trust them with my money and I am active in these casinos.

But I don't like when casinos have mandatory KYC rules and I am not playing in those casinos. Roobet is a good example, I remember when they introduced that rule, I withdrew my funds before that and I never opened their site again.

Sooner or later we may see that all casinos will have mandatory KYC, so actually we cant guarantee that those casinos where we play now without KYC will keep the rule as they may implement mandatory KYC in the future. Once it happen there are only 2 options for us, follow the rule or leave the casino because we do not want to undergo KYC. I'm in the position as you who dont like mandatory KYC, now I become more selective in registering an account in new casinos.

[LUCKMCFLY]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

Lol that's interesting, but yes , you're right, sometimes we look for many casinos that don't have that commitment to wanting to comply with the KYC, because the truth is it is a cumbersome and annoying process, but I have seen it in some Casinos that are Clearly new and They do not offer KYC, the players or members here begin to Attack them that they do not have a license, that it depends on licenses, that for them licenses are important, and licenses in themselves do not prevent a casino from being fraudulent, what is interesting is that the casino pays when you win and that there is not so much paperwork for things because I Personally would say that when it comes to making things better it could be accepted, but what I think is that to Avoid the use they ask for The KYC has to make it clear that some licenses should not be there, and that is difficult, because here they want one thing but not the others, and that Cannot be like that, in a casino things are presented in some way, so That defends the trust and honorability of a casino.

Now, personally I have always preferred that a casino should be clear with what it has, how it is and with everything it can generate, that is, if a casino does not have the capacity to be bigger or nothing good to start when they are complete, now well if the case is Without KYC the truth is I know what they will have to do, I don't know what parameters they can and have to achieve, but on a personal level it would be many things, and not all Players are willing to follow it, in fact in the forum they have many standards to accept certain sites, and among them the licenses, which for me is not relevant at all, for me it is relevant a casino that is good , that pays, that is not a scam, with which be honorable, and fair for me it is enough, because the reason why it does not require KYC is because it must be missing something , and if they Accept People from all over the world that is much better for me , because everyone should have the right to play.

[bettercrypto]

I thought the title of this section was the casino platform itself, but instead it is a platform of crypto casinos that do not implement KYC. And from what I've seen, there are only three crypto casinos that I can say are reputable in the crypto gambling space.

And those three are Betplay, BcGames, and Trustdice. These have existed for a long time on this forum platform; even the signature campaign is still running, which means that many gamblers have been built into their platforms.

[NoToKYC]

We have partnered with the first Anonymous SMM Panel
KYC LEVEL 0

A promo code exclusively for NoToKYC Community will be added very soon

[Mahdirakib]

KYC LEVEL 0 does mean there is no KYC!
All KYC Levels are discussed with the casino staff, casinos with a gambling license have to add KYC terms to comply with law requirements but this DOESN'T MEAN that they will ever do KYC.
I say it again the casinos decide if they ever do KYC or not, but if they have a licencse they have to include KYC terms even if they won't ever do KYC!

Quoting your old post, because you are wrong and you are again wrong. I had previously informed you that JustBit is applying the KYC verification terms, and they are still doing it (check this new scam accusation). But they are still listed as KYC level 0 on your website. You have to verify the information through the evidences, not by the statement of the casino staff. They occasionally provide incorrect information for marketing purposes. Can't you see the truth from those scam accusations? Or have they paid you something to not look into the truth?

[shield132]

It's a very misleading list. Many casinos listed on notokyc.com require KYC verification and are not no-KYC-friendly websites. OP needs to update the list and carefully inspect each website before he adds them because he will upset many customers when someone registers on a listed casino and then will be asked for KYC verification suddenly. OP failed to include Bisq, exch and many other good non-KYC exchanges in the exchanges list.
Sorry OP but you failed, your list is one of the worst and misleading, incomplete list.

[Dunamisx]

It's a very misleading list. Many casinos listed on notokyc.com require KYC verification and are not no-KYC-friendly websites. OP needs to update the list and carefully inspect each website before he adds them because he will upset many customers when someone registers on a listed casino and then will be asked for KYC verification suddenly. OP failed to include Bisq, exch and many other good non-KYC exchanges in the exchanges list.
Sorry OP but you failed, your list is one of the worst and misleading, incomplete list.

You're right, things change with time, I've also seen several examples on exchanges that are not KYC exchange but later turn to one all of a sudden, if we are making a list compilation, we can always cross-check to know if they were still thesame way you left them or not, we may not have to use them all before knowing about them, but the sources to our informations must be verified to be upto date.

[paxmao]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

Finding no KYC is already difficult, I mean, finding reputable sites that have the right comments and support in the forum and we can more or less have some trust in them. The bonus is just cream of top since it is doubly beneficial to get the bonus without having to do so many explanations, proffs, etc... that sometimes are just a excuse to keep our money or keep it "in custody" for months.

[arisatox]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

Finding no KYC is already difficult, I mean, finding reputable sites that have the right comments and support in the forum and we can more or less have some trust in them. The bonus is just cream of top since it is doubly beneficial to get the bonus without having to do so many explanations, proffs, etc... that sometimes are just a excuse to keep our money or keep it "in custody" for months.

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

[Rating Place]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

Finding no KYC is already difficult, I mean, finding reputable sites that have the right comments and support in the forum and we can more or less have some trust in them. The bonus is just cream of top since it is doubly beneficial to get the bonus without having to do so many explanations, proffs, etc... that sometimes are just a excuse to keep our money or keep it "in custody" for months.

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

You are 100% right. When most casinos ask for KYC, they are looking for a way to take your money, especially the winners. They don't want you to play there so they take your money as they show you the door. The big casinos can make up excuses because they know they will get forum backing. There are some casinos that do not do KYC if you aren't using a VPN. This way they know you don't have more than 1 account.

[fapar]

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

Yes, in such a scenario, KYC is an element of risk assessment - whether your money can be stolen without problems or not. They evaluate first of all your jurisdiction - whether you can file a lawsuit against them. And only then being on sanctions lists and the like.

[piebeyb]

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

Yes, in such a scenario, KYC is an element of risk assessment - whether your money can be stolen without problems or not. They evaluate first of all your jurisdiction - whether you can file a lawsuit against them. And only then being on sanctions lists and the like.

It all comes back to each individual, if KYC is really problematic, you should not gamble at a casino that asks you for KYC, but if KYC is not a problem for you, you should look for a site that really has a good reputation on this forum, never give out your identity. in casinos that have just been announced on this forum because it is clearly very dangerous and risky that you might experience.

So far I personally have never sent any ID to the casino just filled in the information data for them at level 1 but usually that's not a problem for me because I'm just a small gambler who bets with less money than a rich gambler who makes bigger bets. Larger ones are usually always vulnerable to strict regulations to prevent money laundering, so it comes back to each individual's view of KYC, whether they are comfortable or not, they should be able to choose it.

[fapar]

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

Yes, in such a scenario, KYC is an element of risk assessment - whether your money can be stolen without problems or not. They evaluate first of all your jurisdiction - whether you can file a lawsuit against them. And only then being on sanctions lists and the like.

It all comes back to each individual, if KYC is really problematic, you should not gamble at a casino that asks you for KYC, but if KYC is not a problem for you, you should look for a site that really has a good reputation on this forum, never give out your identity. in casinos that have just been announced on this forum because it is clearly very dangerous and risky that you might experience.

So far I personally have never sent any ID to the casino just filled in the information data for them at level 1 but usually that's not a problem for me because I'm just a small gambler who bets with less money than a rich gambler who makes bigger bets. Larger ones are usually always vulnerable to strict regulations to prevent money laundering, so it comes back to each individual's view of KYC, whether they are comfortable or not, they should be able to choose it.

This is not about what someone can or cannot pass the KYC. And that hypothetically there is a ranking of players depending on their citizenship. That is, a player from the Top 10 countries (US, UK, GE) will not have problems withdrawing his winnings, like a player from Bangladesh (no offense).

[cafter]

I knew about this site today. I like the interface of the website so simple and minimalist.
but you have listed there many casinos which are not totally non KYC casinos, like Bc.game, metaspins, etc. so I would like to suggest an improvement so it will be easy for everyone to know that this specific site is fully
non KYC or require KYC at some level.
Here is idea for improvment:
You can change the color from green to something else for casinos or sites which are not totally non KYC and ask for KYC at some point, like BCgame they ask for KYC and not truly Non KYC.
or change the color to different shade of green, here in the list the top casino is betplay which is truly non kyc (I asked their support) so only that and other truly Non KYC site needs to be in green color.

[LUCKMCFLY]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

Finding no KYC is already difficult, I mean, finding reputable sites that have the right comments and support in the forum and we can more or less have some trust in them. The bonus is just cream of top since it is doubly beneficial to get the bonus without having to do so many explanations, proffs, etc... that sometimes are just a excuse to keep our money or keep it "in custody" for months.

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

You are 100% right. When most casinos ask for KYC, they are looking for a way to take your money, especially the winners. They don't want you to play there so they take your money as they show you the door. The big casinos can make up excuses because they know they will get forum backing. There are some casinos that do not do KYC if you aren't using a VPN. This way they know you don't have more than 1 account.

Sometimes you miss those sites that previously did not require KYC and could only serve players with the indicator number, ID, that was enough, this is something we had and that we were happy and we didn't know it, it is difficult to find sites with good comments and everything as they say, the last site like this was Freebitco.in now it joined the inevitable KYC clan, I don't know, sometimes we chase the best things, the best sites, the best casino platforms, but we don't We realize that they are putting us all in a bag where Absolutely no one can defend us, they will know everything or they can know everything about us, they want us, where we lived, what we do, what we don't do, through these KYC information and much more easier to investigate the facts, in fact it is a better database than the FBI itself, since these types of things are what we should see and present as a fact what it is.

By being present in many Things we could generate quite a few ideas so that the KYC Requirement is something different because things can be quite Obvious with Governments , and Entities that are decisive in our lives, for this reason the largest casinos are The most reliable ones have KYC that are quite strong, for me in particular when I am in a place , because what is done is that if they Start to bother me a lot, what I do is leave and never come back, when I am in a casino where I comply My KYC, they Approve it at Once, so this is what I say that a good caisno they approve it, but I think that in the future the best casino will be the one that does not Allow KYC on its People , because here things will be like this , So for now what I can say is that while they can they have to do their best to not demand so much , so what this does is scare them, if a casino comes out that does not allow KYC and that is trustworthy, then Everything will be in a Great Way , something that they don't see Possible now, but let's Wait and see.

[delfastTions]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

Finding no KYC is already difficult, I mean, finding reputable sites that have the right comments and support in the forum and we can more or less have some trust in them. The bonus is just cream of top since it is doubly beneficial to get the bonus without having to do so many explanations, proffs, etc... that sometimes are just a excuse to keep our money or keep it "in custody" for months.

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

You are 100% right. When most casinos ask for KYC, they are looking for a way to take your money, especially the winners. They don't want you to play there so they take your money as they show you the door. The big casinos can make up excuses because they know they will get forum backing. There are some casinos that do not do KYC if you aren't using a VPN. This way they know you don't have more than 1 account.

Sometimes you miss those sites that previously did not require KYC and could only serve players with the indicator number, ID, that was enough, this is something we had and that we were happy and we didn't know it, it is difficult to find sites with good comments and everything as they say, the last site like this was Freebitco.in now it joined the inevitable KYC clan, I don't know, sometimes we chase the best things, the best sites, the best casino platforms, but we don't We realize that they are putting us all in a bag where Absolutely no one can defend us, they will know everything or they can know everything about us, they want us, where we lived, what we do, what we don't do, through these KYC information and much more easier to investigate the facts, in fact it is a better database than the FBI itself, since these types of things are what we should see and present as a fact what it is.

By being present in many Things we could generate quite a few ideas so that the KYC Requirement is something different because things can be quite Obvious with Governments , and Entities that are decisive in our lives, for this reason the largest casinos are The most reliable ones have KYC that are quite strong, for me in particular when I am in a place , because what is done is that if they Start to bother me a lot, what I do is leave and never come back, when I am in a casino where I comply My KYC, they Approve it at Once, so this is what I say that a good caisno they approve it, but I think that in the future the best casino will be the one that does not Allow KYC on its People , because here things will be like this , So for now what I can say is that while they can they have to do their best to not demand so much , so what this does is scare them, if a casino comes out that does not allow KYC and that is trustworthy, then Everything will be in a Great Way , something that they don't see Possible now, but let's Wait and see.

You wrote everything correctly. 

Now many players have already realized that providing their personal data in each casino, which is obviously the result of complying with the requirements of the law and local regulators, is a completely unnecessary and unnecessary procedure for players, which in fact does not provide any special guarantees for the player.  Now players are clearly in demand for casinos without KYC requirements.  And naturally, such a casino will be powerful and prosperous if it operates without violating the rights of players to win and pays it out without problems. 
But the main problem here is the lack of jurisdiction, a country where such a casino would actually be 100% legal and would have the appropriate license for gambling.  Unfortunately, the requirements of the American authorities everywhere have some impact on this licensing.  But the demand of millions of players for the need for anonymous payments in casino gambling is completely legal and should be accepted by legislators in some of the most progressive countries in the world. 

So let's wait some more time, this issue with mandatory KYC should start to disappear simply because of its stupidity.

[LUCKMCFLY]

the thread caught my attention because I thought there are many sites without KYC, or They don't require that identification to operate, but I see that now getting a place like this is almost impossible

You are totally right.
It's almost impossible to find a crypto casino or a centralized service that will never ask you to verify your identity at some point even if they claim they won't.
Just recently, a new member complained on the scam accusation board about a casino for asking him to pass kyc after winning (obviously) although they have a huge banner on their main page stating that they are a kyc-free casino!

Finding no KYC is already difficult, I mean, finding reputable sites that have the right comments and support in the forum and we can more or less have some trust in them. The bonus is just cream of top since it is doubly beneficial to get the bonus without having to do so many explanations, proffs, etc... that sometimes are just a excuse to keep our money or keep it "in custody" for months.

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

You are 100% right. When most casinos ask for KYC, they are looking for a way to take your money, especially the winners. They don't want you to play there so they take your money as they show you the door. The big casinos can make up excuses because they know they will get forum backing. There are some casinos that do not do KYC if you aren't using a VPN. This way they know you don't have more than 1 account.

Sometimes you miss those sites that previously did not require KYC and could only serve players with the indicator number, ID, that was enough, this is something we had and that we were happy and we didn't know it, it is difficult to find sites with good comments and everything as they say, the last site like this was Freebitco.in now it joined the inevitable KYC clan, I don't know, sometimes we chase the best things, the best sites, the best casino platforms, but we don't We realize that they are putting us all in a bag where Absolutely no one can defend us, they will know everything or they can know everything about us, they want us, where we lived, what we do, what we don't do, through these KYC information and much more easier to investigate the facts, in fact it is a better database than the FBI itself, since these types of things are what we should see and present as a fact what it is.

By being present in many Things we could generate quite a few ideas so that the KYC Requirement is something different because things can be quite Obvious with Governments , and Entities that are decisive in our lives, for this reason the largest casinos are The most reliable ones have KYC that are quite strong, for me in particular when I am in a place , because what is done is that if they Start to bother me a lot, what I do is leave and never come back, when I am in a casino where I comply My KYC, they Approve it at Once, so this is what I say that a good caisno they approve it, but I think that in the future the best casino will be the one that does not Allow KYC on its People , because here things will be like this , So for now what I can say is that while they can they have to do their best to not demand so much , so what this does is scare them, if a casino comes out that does not allow KYC and that is trustworthy, then Everything will be in a Great Way , something that they don't see Possible now, but let's Wait and see.

You wrote everything correctly. 

Now many players have already realized that providing their personal data in each casino, which is obviously the result of complying with the requirements of the law and local regulators, is a completely unnecessary and unnecessary procedure for players, which in fact does not provide any special guarantees for the player.  Now players are clearly in demand for casinos without KYC requirements.  And naturally, such a casino will be powerful and prosperous if it operates without violating the rights of players to win and pays it out without problems. 
But the main problem here is the lack of jurisdiction, a country where such a casino would actually be 100% legal and would have the appropriate license for gambling.  Unfortunately, the requirements of the American authorities everywhere have some impact on this licensing.  But the demand of millions of players for the need for anonymous payments in casino gambling is completely legal and should be accepted by legislators in some of the most progressive countries in the world. 

So let's wait some more time, this issue with mandatory KYC should start to disappear simply because of its stupidity.

Well, I have always believed one thing, that when we do anything in a casino, well, on every occasion I have seen that the USA, despite everything, has a hegemony not only with the economy but that it greatly influences any case of having the different processes. Even with the laws that influence any country and according to the countries that they are prohibited from, this is something that will always give the opportunity to do things very carefully, and as we all know, this thing about casinos and everything that has to do with it. With identification there are people who are very delicate, in fact there are many who do not even enter the casinos due to the KYC requirement and that is something that can be very ugly for the casinos, because just as there are that type of people, as As time passes, many will no longer want to leave their data there, just the example of an Exchange like Binance, well, it is an Exchange, but basically what they do is have control of what they do all the time and they give up very It is easy for any authority in any country to provide all the data and KYC of the transactions, and in fact they suspend the accounts they have there, so this is something that we are always going to view with a bad light.

And if this happens with an exchange that has so much volume, so Much market Capitalization , then a casino that does not have authority but certain people , Under which by means of a court order they can put the casino under investigation, the Casino will not refuse , because You know that you lose or could lose your credentials , licenses , Among other things.

This does not mean that one as a person, as a player , is in bad things, but Because a few can Access this data, that is why now this new way to make the casino spend more because not everyone will have this Ability There will be some casinos that will be a normal expense, like removing a hair from a cat, but for casinos that are just starting out it will be very hard.

[leonair]

Op your site is looking cool. And your list is very nice but how you organized these lists and how you ranked them.  Did you get them from bitcointalk or from the entire gambling industry? I have seen some sites listed on your site that have never been on this forum. Because of this I don't understand how you ranked each casino site from top to last.

[delfastTions]

~ snip ~

Well, I have always believed one thing, that when we do anything in a casino, well, on every occasion I have seen that the USA, despite everything, has a hegemony not only with the economy but that it greatly influences any case of having the different processes. Even with the laws that influence any country and according to the countries that they are prohibited from, this is something that will always give the opportunity to do things very carefully, and as we all know, this thing about casinos and everything that has to do with it. With identification there are people who are very delicate, in fact there are many who do not even enter the casinos due to the KYC requirement and that is something that can be very ugly for the casinos, because just as there are that type of people, as As time passes, many will no longer want to leave their data there, just the example of an Exchange like Binance, well, it is an Exchange, but basically what they do is have control of what they do all the time and they give up very It is easy for any authority in any country to provide all the data and KYC of the transactions, and in fact they suspend the accounts they have there, so this is something that we are always going to view with a bad light.

And if this happens with an exchange that has so much volume, so Much market Capitalization , then a casino that does not have authority but certain people , Under which by means of a court order they can put the casino under investigation, the Casino will not refuse , because You know that you lose or could lose your credentials , licenses , Among other things.

This does not mean that one as a person, as a player , is in bad things, but Because a few can Access this data, that is why now this new way to make the casino spend more because not everyone will have this Ability There will be some casinos that will be a normal expense, like removing a hair from a cat, but for casinos that are just starting out it will be very hard.

I continue to hope that some states with a liberal system of governance and traditional values ​​for the population of this country in the form of sufficiently voluminous elements of individual and public freedom, for example, some Scandinavian country, may well begin the process of reducing the regulatory influence of the USA on local legislation.  And by the way, the result of such ignoring the strict instructions of the American “rulers of the world” may well be legislative regulation of anonymous payments, including in the case of crypto casinos.  Here it should be taken into account that the hegemony of the USA is clearly collapsing before our eyes, although many still do not see it.  But such processes are clearly underway and their results will definitely be for some jurisdictions in the form of weakening regulatory requirements for anonymous payments and other methods of communication, for example, in national currencies without using the dollar.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~ snip ~

Well, I have always believed one thing, that when we do anything in a casino, well, on every occasion I have seen that the USA, despite everything, has a hegemony not only with the economy but that it greatly influences any case of having the different processes. Even with the laws that influence any country and according to the countries that they are prohibited from, this is something that will always give the opportunity to do things very carefully, and as we all know, this thing about casinos and everything that has to do with it. With identification there are people who are very delicate, in fact there are many who do not even enter the casinos due to the KYC requirement and that is something that can be very ugly for the casinos, because just as there are that type of people, as As time passes, many will no longer want to leave their data there, just the example of an Exchange like Binance, well, it is an Exchange, but basically what they do is have control of what they do all the time and they give up very It is easy for any authority in any country to provide all the data and KYC of the transactions, and in fact they suspend the accounts they have there, so this is something that we are always going to view with a bad light.

And if this happens with an exchange that has so much volume, so Much market Capitalization , then a casino that does not have authority but certain people , Under which by means of a court order they can put the casino under investigation, the Casino will not refuse , because You know that you lose or could lose your credentials , licenses , Among other things.

This does not mean that one as a person, as a player , is in bad things, but Because a few can Access this data, that is why now this new way to make the casino spend more because not everyone will have this Ability There will be some casinos that will be a normal expense, like removing a hair from a cat, but for casinos that are just starting out it will be very hard.

I continue to hope that some states with a liberal system of governance and traditional values ​​for the population of this country in the form of sufficiently voluminous elements of individual and public freedom, for example, some Scandinavian country, may well begin the process of reducing the regulatory influence of the USA on local legislation.  And by the way, the result of such ignoring the strict instructions of the American “rulers of the world” may well be legislative regulation of anonymous payments, including in the case of crypto casinos.  Here it should be taken into account that the hegemony of the USA is clearly collapsing before our eyes, although many still do not see it.  But such processes are clearly underway and their results will definitely be for some jurisdictions in the form of weakening regulatory requirements for anonymous payments and other methods of communication, for example, in national currencies without using the dollar.

Well this reminds me of that Snowden movie , which says a lot , the truth is that it is a movie that every time I watch it I discover more messages and more things that they have that are , one might say, hidden and that people still don't see , but I say something, when we are in any country that is under the influence of the USA, this is all good, excellent credit systems that can do any type of transaction, this is something that can be obvious , but when a country enters total discrepancy with the USA, they are capable of turning them into nothing, the first thing they do is attack their electrical system, no matter how analog it is, they have mechanisms to make them Uncontrollable, they block them, they put them against the wall at a commercial , technological level, they They make other countries turn Against them, they cut the commercial system, they destroy the financial system, then they also restrict the way they can export products, this is the power that the USA has over any country in the world, and I think that is something since it has a lot to do with foreign policies or harassment like that , I also believe that they do not ally themselves with their policies of this style because it is seeking that evil that many see as not necessary.

There are currently many countries that are against the US system, but very Few have taken the liberty to move forward, a clear example is China , perhaps Russia , but any Weaker Country is difficult because it does not let them prosper, and the external debt that I have with the USA is very high, and it is almost impossible to pay it , that is the only thing that we can Generate by seeing that the policies that they make in regulations give them as a consequence, perhaps that is Why the others Countries or sdare to go against this , that's why I casino them and everything that has to do with those KYC Policies they follow them to the letter , I think they prefer to lose customers than lose the entire business, that's how I see it .

[delfastTions]

~snip ~

~ snip ~

There are currently many countries that are against the US system, but very Few have taken the liberty to move forward, a clear example is China , perhaps Russia , but any Weaker Country is difficult because it does not let them prosper, and the external debt that I have with the USA is very high, and it is almost impossible to pay it , that is the only thing that we can Generate by seeing that the policies that they make in regulations give them as a consequence, perhaps that is Why the others Countries or sdare to go against this , that's why I casino them and everything that has to do with those KYC Policies they follow them to the letter , I think they prefer to lose customers than lose the entire business, that's how I see it .

It is quite surprising that such economically powerful European countries also listen to the American establishment.
 I now think that some smart American sociologists close to the authorities realized several decades ago that they themselves had to raise future leaders of such countries, prepared in advance and, of course, not only loyal to America, but also fully professing the values ​​of the American way of life.  And perhaps many of the politicians at the head of European countries who are now governing are just such America-bred politicians.  This is simply very competent political management and marketing at the same time. 
Accordingly, it is simply ridiculous to talk about a purely nationally oriented policy for a country with the head of the country installed by the American deep state, in fact the sockpuppet of the American rulers.  This is impossible.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip ~

~ snip ~

There are currently many countries that are against the US system, but very Few have taken the liberty to move forward, a clear example is China , perhaps Russia , but any Weaker Country is difficult because it does not let them prosper, and the external debt that I have with the USA is very high, and it is almost impossible to pay it , that is the only thing that we can Generate by seeing that the policies that they make in regulations give them as a consequence, perhaps that is Why the others Countries or sdare to go against this , that's why I casino them and everything that has to do with those KYC Policies they follow them to the letter , I think they prefer to lose customers than lose the entire business, that's how I see it .

It is quite surprising that such economically powerful European countries also listen to the American establishment.
 I now think that some smart American sociologists close to the authorities realized several decades ago that they themselves had to raise future leaders of such countries, prepared in advance and, of course, not only loyal to America, but also fully professing the values ​​of the American way of life.  And perhaps many of the politicians at the head of European countries who are now governing are just such America-bred politicians.  This is simply very competent political management and marketing at the same time. 
Accordingly, it is simply ridiculous to talk about a purely nationally oriented policy for a country with the head of the country installed by the American deep state, in fact the sockpuppet of the American rulers.  This is impossible.

Well, you only have to see that you are skiing, nothing more in the Forum, the meixers were Banned, when they are Companies that entered well here and were the ones that paid the best, they have an advance in Every sense to be able to do things well , that generated work and a lot of things were done, the benefits of a mixer is more than everything to have enough anonymity, privacy , something that seems normal to me that they seek the Opportunity so that they can Enjoy it, money is something that the mixers must basically take care of Well, they help to have that Privacy that we need at some point, and that is also over in the Forum , but why ? Because the bears and policies have to be made with their heads turned towards the USA, any Movie has to be focused there, sometimes there are things that are difficult to understand, which can be very lethal for some in different countries, but unfortunately If you don't abide by what they say, they Sanction you , they put you on blacklists, the EU is one of the things that should have the most power, but it doesn't.

I say that at the political level things with the USA will always be under a very high hegemony, and that goes a long way, with all the porocesmideimtno that are made, with all the laws that are implemented, so it is very easy to get involved in the casino industry, making us see that those who make transactions with Bitcoin have to be restricted, they have to see who makes it to apply the acid, either with taxes and with different ways of seeing the things that can harm them because of it , we will always be at their command and disposal, sometimes it is hard to Understand but what more can be done, as long as there is not a type of total Irreverence , I believe that things will always be seen that way, there is no other way, for Now let's face it, because we would simply look like a small ant next to a big skyscraper, that's the easiest way for me to understand it.

[Dunamisx]

Op your site is looking cool. And your list is very nice but how you organized these lists and how you ranked them.  Did you get them from bitcointalk or from the entire gambling industry? I have seen some sites listed on your site that have never been on this forum. Because of this I don't understand how you ranked each casino site from top to last.

I think when it comes to discussions like this, we should be more real here, OP can bring in more casinos he's fine and sure of to have no such KYC requirements, but it's ours to make research more about them, also, we don't have to limit this to only the ones present on this platform, there are many other reputable ones out there a d may also join this loving community after it's discovery by them, it's expected of us to make more research about anyone we see from his list.

[EarnOnVictor]

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

Yes, in such a scenario, KYC is an element of risk assessment - whether your money can be stolen without problems or not. They evaluate first of all your jurisdiction - whether you can file a lawsuit against them. And only then being on sanctions lists and the like.

KYC has its good and bad sides, but in all, it has to be observed and completed if your casinos demand it, especially if the land at which they operate demands it for continued cooperation with them and also for regulations. But the issue is that the data could be stolen or the casinos could use it as an excuse to cheat the customer in question. Well, that aside, about what you said, it might be true that KYC will help the casinos verify the personality of the customer and the residence claims, but it is not about your lawsuit claim per se. Anybody from any country can sue any lawful casino even regardless of the status, once you have the money and all it takes, you contact a lawyer from their country and the case begins. So, I don't think it is a valid point that casinos ask for KYC to prevent a lawsuit. But if a country is banned by the casinos, of course, the KYC will be able to reveal it even if the citizen of the country has opened an account. I read countless of some cases like that every time where they would have funded the account but they couldn't do KYC since their country is banned.

[delfastTions]

~snip ~

~ snip ~

There are currently many countries that are against the US system, but very Few have taken the liberty to move forward, a clear example is China , perhaps Russia , but any Weaker Country is difficult because it does not let them prosper, and the external debt that I have with the USA is very high, and it is almost impossible to pay it , that is the only thing that we can Generate by seeing that the policies that they make in regulations give them as a consequence, perhaps that is Why the others Countries or sdare to go against this , that's why I casino them and everything that has to do with those KYC Policies they follow them to the letter , I think they prefer to lose customers than lose the entire business, that's how I see it .

It is quite surprising that such economically powerful European countries also listen to the American establishment.
 I now think that some smart American sociologists close to the authorities realized several decades ago that they themselves had to raise future leaders of such countries, prepared in advance and, of course, not only loyal to America, but also fully professing the values ​​of the American way of life.  And perhaps many of the politicians at the head of European countries who are now governing are just such America-bred politicians.  This is simply very competent political management and marketing at the same time.  
Accordingly, it is simply ridiculous to talk about a purely nationally oriented policy for a country with the head of the country installed by the American deep state, in fact the sockpuppet of the American rulers.  This is impossible.

Well, you only have to see that you are skiing, nothing more in the Forum, the meixers were Banned, when they are Companies that entered well here and were the ones that paid the best, they have an advance in Every sense to be able to do things well , that generated work and a lot of things were done, the benefits of a mixer is more than everything to have enough anonymity, privacy , something that seems normal to me that they seek the Opportunity so that they can Enjoy it, money is something that the mixers must basically take care of Well, they help to have that Privacy that we need at some point, and that is also over in the Forum , but why ? Because the bears and policies have to be made with their heads turned towards the USA, any Movie has to be focused there, sometimes there are things that are difficult to understand, which can be very lethal for some in different countries, but unfortunately If you don't abide by what they say, they Sanction you , they put you on blacklists, the EU is one of the things that should have the most power, but it doesn't.

I say that at the political level things with the USA will always be under a very high hegemony, and that goes a long way, with all the porocesmideimtno that are made, with all the laws that are implemented, so it is very easy to get involved in the casino industry, making us see that those who make transactions with Bitcoin have to be restricted, they have to see who makes it to apply the acid, either with taxes and with different ways of seeing the things that can harm them because of it , we will always be at their command and disposal, sometimes it is hard to Understand but what more can be done, as long as there is not a type of total Irreverence , I believe that things will always be seen that way, there is no other way, for Now let's face it, because we would simply look like a small ant next to a big skyscraper, that's the easiest way for me to understand it.

I don’t quite understand what you want to say in such a discussion.  If you think that USA’s dominance in the world is unshakable and will continue for another five centuries, then I think that this is not so.  The historical experience of the development of civilization tells us that all empires collapse.  It will be the same as what is happening now.  By the way, I think that the vaunted democracy that American politicians often like to talk about has largely turned into a lie and a farce in the modern world.  All the same, most governments in the world, elected by the population, primarily care about their ruling clan and do not give a damn about how the people of this country themselves live there.  
Maybe only Bukele cares about his people.

Sorry for the offtopic, but these questions, of course, also relate to the KYC procedure.  It is the financial hegemony that necessarily establishes the technical requirements of this requirement.  But often this not only violates anonymity, but even becomes dangerous for the person who transfers his personal data to a third party.  And something needs to be done about this.  This should not be the case on a global scale.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip ~

~ snip ~

There are currently many countries that are against the US system, but very Few have taken the liberty to move forward, a clear example is China , perhaps Russia , but any Weaker Country is difficult because it does not let them prosper, and the external debt that I have with the USA is very high, and it is almost impossible to pay it , that is the only thing that we can Generate by seeing that the policies that they make in regulations give them as a consequence, perhaps that is Why the others Countries or sdare to go against this , that's why I casino them and everything that has to do with those KYC Policies they follow them to the letter , I think they prefer to lose customers than lose the entire business, that's how I see it .

It is quite surprising that such economically powerful European countries also listen to the American establishment.
 I now think that some smart American sociologists close to the authorities realized several decades ago that they themselves had to raise future leaders of such countries, prepared in advance and, of course, not only loyal to America, but also fully professing the values ​​of the American way of life.  And perhaps many of the politicians at the head of European countries who are now governing are just such America-bred politicians.  This is simply very competent political management and marketing at the same time.  
Accordingly, it is simply ridiculous to talk about a purely nationally oriented policy for a country with the head of the country installed by the American deep state, in fact the sockpuppet of the American rulers.  This is impossible.

Well, you only have to see that you are skiing, nothing more in the Forum, the meixers were Banned, when they are Companies that entered well here and were the ones that paid the best, they have an advance in Every sense to be able to do things well , that generated work and a lot of things were done, the benefits of a mixer is more than everything to have enough anonymity, privacy , something that seems normal to me that they seek the Opportunity so that they can Enjoy it, money is something that the mixers must basically take care of Well, they help to have that Privacy that we need at some point, and that is also over in the Forum , but why ? Because the bears and policies have to be made with their heads turned towards the USA, any Movie has to be focused there, sometimes there are things that are difficult to understand, which can be very lethal for some in different countries, but unfortunately If you don't abide by what they say, they Sanction you , they put you on blacklists, the EU is one of the things that should have the most power, but it doesn't.

I say that at the political level things with the USA will always be under a very high hegemony, and that goes a long way, with all the porocesmideimtno that are made, with all the laws that are implemented, so it is very easy to get involved in the casino industry, making us see that those who make transactions with Bitcoin have to be restricted, they have to see who makes it to apply the acid, either with taxes and with different ways of seeing the things that can harm them because of it , we will always be at their command and disposal, sometimes it is hard to Understand but what more can be done, as long as there is not a type of total Irreverence , I believe that things will always be seen that way, there is no other way, for Now let's face it, because we would simply look like a small ant next to a big skyscraper, that's the easiest way for me to understand it.

I don’t quite understand what you want to say in such a discussion.  If you think that USA’s dominance in the world is unshakable and will continue for another five centuries, then I think that this is not so.  The historical experience of the development of civilization tells us that all empires collapse.  It will be the same as what is happening now.  By the way, I think that the vaunted democracy that American politicians often like to talk about has largely turned into a lie and a farce in the modern world.  All the same, most governments in the world, elected by the population, primarily care about their ruling clan and do not give a damn about how the people of this country themselves live there.  
Maybe only Bukele cares about his people.

Sorry for the offtopic, but these questions, of course, also relate to the KYC procedure.  It is the financial hegemony that necessarily establishes the technical requirements of this requirement.  But often this not only violates anonymity, but even becomes dangerous for the person who transfers his personal data to a third party.  And something needs to be done about this.  This should not be the case on a global scale.

Yes, that's something I wanted to convey, what seems to be that I went in an almost political direction, the thing is that all this KYC stuff seems very Interesting to me, for example what you said that now the casino have to invest a lot of money so that the data is secure, that is something that all citizens do not like and obviously who is going to like to put more Money of their daily earnings for data protection,? Also right now they can do it, but as that database grows, how can casinos face these security costs? Could it be that at some point something irreverent has to be Done on the Part of the casinos ? What will happen when the casinos cannot handle this additional expense because they are facing a large expense that they had not previously anticipated , then will it be that in the near future the casinos will no longer mind leaving some licenses that allow them to continue with the KYC ? Just make sure that Since they have a good reputation , is that Enough for people to trust People like that?

Well that is something that I don't Know if it is possible, maybe I think too much , but it is an Option, a crazy option but it is an option that would guarantee them not to spend too much, with respect to the Above , I have Always seen Something , the USA Always exerts Pressure on every Process , whether or not it is in the USA, they always have to do things the way they see fit, the KYC thing is an Example,  I don't Know , But it is for me to Interpret it as a way to Control who they play with crypto , and It is very likely that those who play with Crypto have Bitcoin and those who have Bitcoin is because they probably have a lot, or I have little , whether they are whales or not, and that is something they Need to know so that in the midst of the Regulations of the countries They can say that they want to implement Special Taxes and thus start with some intimidation, but this is the only thing I imagine , is that I am from a government system where one Already knows more or less what is Coming.

[terciduk123]

I knew about this site today. I like the interface of the website so simple and minimalist.
but you have listed there many casinos which are not totally non KYC casinos, like Bc.game, metaspins, etc. so I would like to suggest an improvement so it will be easy for everyone to know that this specific site is fully
non KYC or require KYC at some level.
Here is idea for improvment:
You can change the color from green to something else for casinos or sites which are not totally non KYC and ask for KYC at some point, like BCgame they ask for KYC and not truly Non KYC.
or change the color to different shade of green, here in the list the top casino is betplay which is truly non kyc (I asked their support) so only that and other truly Non KYC site needs to be in green color.

Yeah, that's true, it seems like it needs more detail, because it can lead to misunderstanding, basically some of the casinos displayed on notokyc.com sites like BC.Game, Nitrobetting, Metaspin, and Bets.io can ask users to do KYC from time to time, or may be given an explanation of the withdrawal limit for users who do not do KyC. So there will be no misunderstandings for the reader.

[panjul07]

Yeah, that's true, it seems like it needs more detail, because it can lead to misunderstanding, basically some of the casinos displayed on notokyc.com sites like BC.Game, Nitrobetting, Metaspin, and Bets.io can ask users to do KYC from time to time, or may be given an explanation of the withdrawal limit for users who do not do KyC. So there will be no misunderstandings for the reader.

These days, 90% or more casinos are licensed and it is hard to find casino which is KYC-free because most casinos has the term that they reserve the right to ask KYC at some points.
This review site use "NoToKYC" as their main domain is just to attract players, because it is attractive name especially we know that there are still many gamblers who want to play anonymously.
Sooner or later those who register in the casinos because they were attracted with the NoToKYC slogan, they will be disappointed once the casino ask them to submit their personal document.

[spiker777]

Nice Website Op. but why the Exchange list is too short. there are only 3 exchange listed. i see you listed 2 Swap exchanges also. I checked the swaps you added. looks like they are Centralized Swaps.
then shouldn't you add all the DEX Swap platforms? none of them require kyc as far as I know.  they are also more safer compared to these Centralized manuall exchanges.
or you just add those sites which exclusivly do partnership with you?

[delfastTions]

~snip ~

~ snip ~

~snip ~

Well, you only have to see that you are skiing, nothing more in the Forum, the meixers were Banned, when they are Companies that entered well here and were the ones that paid the best, they have an advance in Every sense to be able to do things well , that generated work and a lot of things were done, the benefits of a mixer is more than everything to have enough anonymity, privacy , something that seems normal to me that they seek the Opportunity so that they can Enjoy it, money is something that the mixers must basically take care of Well, they help to have that Privacy that we need at some point, and that is also over in the Forum , but why ? Because the bears and policies have to be made with their heads turned towards the USA, any Movie has to be focused there, sometimes there are things that are difficult to understand, which can be very lethal for some in different countries, but unfortunately If you don't abide by what they say, they Sanction you , they put you on blacklists, the EU is one of the things that should have the most power, but it doesn't.

I say that at the political level things with the USA will always be under a very high hegemony, and that goes a long way, with all the porocesmideimtno that are made, with all the laws that are implemented, so it is very easy to get involved in the casino industry, making us see that those who make transactions with Bitcoin have to be restricted, they have to see who makes it to apply the acid, either with taxes and with different ways of seeing the things that can harm them because of it , we will always be at their command and disposal, sometimes it is hard to Understand but what more can be done, as long as there is not a type of total Irreverence , I believe that things will always be seen that way, there is no other way, for Now let's face it, because we would simply look like a small ant next to a big skyscraper, that's the easiest way for me to understand it.

I don’t quite understand what you want to say in such a discussion.  If you think that USA’s dominance in the world is unshakable and will continue for another five centuries, then I think that this is not so.  The historical experience of the development of civilization tells us that all empires collapse.  It will be the same as what is happening now.  By the way, I think that the vaunted democracy that American politicians often like to talk about has largely turned into a lie and a farce in the modern world.  All the same, most governments in the world, elected by the population, primarily care about their ruling clan and do not give a damn about how the people of this country themselves live there.  
Maybe only Bukele cares about his people.

Sorry for the offtopic, but these questions, of course, also relate to the KYC procedure.  It is the financial hegemony that necessarily establishes the technical requirements of this requirement.  But often this not only violates anonymity, but even becomes dangerous for the person who transfers his personal data to a third party.  And something needs to be done about this.  This should not be the case on a global scale.

Yes, that's something I wanted to convey, what seems to be that I went in an almost political direction, the thing is that all this KYC stuff seems very Interesting to me, for example what you said that now the casino have to invest a lot of money so that the data is secure, that is something that all citizens do not like and obviously who is going to like to put more Money of their daily earnings for data protection,? Also right now they can do it, but as that database grows, how can casinos face these security costs? Could it be that at some point something irreverent has to be Done on the Part of the casinos ? What will happen when the casinos cannot handle this additional expense because they are facing a large expense that they had not previously anticipated , then will it be that in the near future the casinos will no longer mind leaving some licenses that allow them to continue with the KYC ? Just make sure that Since they have a good reputation , is that Enough for people to trust People like that?

Well that is something that I don't Know if it is possible, maybe I think too much , but it is an Option, a crazy option but it is an option that would guarantee them not to spend too much, with respect to the Above , I have Always seen Something , the USA Always exerts Pressure on every Process , whether or not it is in the USA, they always have to do things the way they see fit, the KYC thing is an Example,  I don't Know , But it is for me to Interpret it as a way to Control who they play with crypto , and It is very likely that those who play with Crypto have Bitcoin and those who have Bitcoin is because they probably have a lot, or I have little , whether they are whales or not, and that is something they Need to know so that in the midst of the Regulations of the countries They can say that they want to implement Special Taxes and thus start with some intimidation, but this is the only thing I imagine , is that I am from a government system where one Already knows more or less what is Coming.

The motivation of the ruling clan in the USA and in all other countries of the world as a whole is approximately the same.  This clan simply needs to control the population of their country, and fiat money and cryptocurrencies are a key factor in this process.  If there is complete information about the financial condition of a particular person or household, then the needs of such a person or household are approximately clear in advance.  Therefore, you can understand in advance what this person needs to sell and how much he will buy the product or service for, respectively.  Next, there is a basic calculation that this person or household simply will not have any money left to go beyond their current consumption of goods and services.  And you can accurately calculate the cost of services, including taxation.  Thus, total control over the population is done primitively and easily.  But secret possession of large amounts of cryptocurrency violates this principle.  So states are introducing KYC and AML and other stupid control tools against the owner of cryptocurrencies in order to include cryptocurrency lovers in the overall picture of total total control.
 By the way, this also forces people to work hard and productively.  And still don’t get rich and don’t become very rich.  What can be safely and objectively considered as a modern and humane way of enslaving people.

[EarnOnVictor]

I knew about this site today. I like the interface of the website so simple and minimalist.
but you have listed there many casinos which are not totally non KYC casinos, like Bc.game, metaspins, etc. so I would like to suggest an improvement so it will be easy for everyone to know that this specific site is fully
non KYC or require KYC at some level.
Here is idea for improvment:
You can change the color from green to something else for casinos or sites which are not totally non KYC and ask for KYC at some point, like BCgame they ask for KYC and not truly Non KYC.
or change the color to different shade of green, here in the list the top casino is betplay which is truly non kyc (I asked their support) so only that and other truly Non KYC site needs to be in green color.

Yeah, that's true, it seems like it needs more detail, because it can lead to misunderstanding, basically some of the casinos displayed on notokyc.com sites like BC.Game, Nitrobetting, Metaspin, and Bets.io can ask users to do KYC from time to time, or may be given an explanation of the withdrawal limit for users who do not do KyC. So there will be no misunderstandings for the reader.

This is why we should be thorough when choosing our new casinos, we should not limit it to what external websites tell us, and certainly not to their terms and conditions too, because I have seen some T&Cs that are indeed faulty, or maybe it is the casinos that make it looks like that so that they can change it later or use the confused state of it to cheat their customers. What I do in this situation is that if I ever see and want to deal with a no-KYC casino, I make sure that I ask my final questions to their representatives. This might change later because some would even move to KYC casinos even when they started with no-KYC and start asking people for KYC later, which might be the case of the website you posted. Some casinos will even use that excuse not to pay many of their customers who have a sizable amount of money in their accounts when that change happens.

A lot of nonsense is going on online now and you will pity some people with the way they are making them suffer and going through what they might possibly not be able to provide after this change. The main purpose of their no-KYC casinos is for them to show that they are initially against the prevailing laws/authorities and by that not asking anyone for KYC. This now will make people who want their privacy intact to open an account, and the same goes for those who are just a victim and many more who don't have clean money and all that. And before they know it, many might be trapped with the money and that could be the end of that money. Some will then fight for it if it is legit while many others will leave it there for one reason or the other. This is pathetic and I would rather go for the KYC casinos straight from the beginning, anything can change with the no-KYC ones.

[LUCKMCFLY]

<snip>

I think the same, people at some point will realize that they are ladders of a system that is always based on control by governments, by banks, because it is the need for money that makes everyone bow their heads and succumb to the imminent threats and with a lot of diplomacy that governments do, in this order of days I think it is as you say, things are Always directedTowards Control by governments, they always look for a way to get into things where they do not They have total freedom, I have seen how some regulations are established and that is something that many do not like, because the regulations are quite a lot of obstacles that are made so that people do not have freedom over financial activities, this comes down to the KYC requirements, the little requirements they set with crypto, with bitcoin, and the way to control them is by knowing who is managing these technologies to put it in their database and then make them start Paying higher taxes.

I don't know if in other countries the fact of playing in online casinos implies that they have to pay taxes, that is something that is not something that I see with good eyes for me these things have to look as ugly as possible, if I play in Anyway , if I register and want to play, why should I pay tax? Why do they have to oversee an Activity that is unrelated to a government? just for using cyypto? So sometimes I Understand very well those casino players who never Complied with their KYC , who do not play in casinos just so as not to leave their Identification there, that is something completely Understandable , I know that there is a lot of hope in the world who have a lot in bitcoin and they do not want any Government to know about their Finances and with all reason, they do not Want the government to take strong measures against those people, sometimes OTP Exchanges are very good because they Always make any action that is Difficult to do , possible through third parties.

[Ojima-ojo]

The thing is that, casinos have various strategies to hold their customers to the neck because when you come across some of those shady casinos that tend to change the term and conditions just to suit their course of cheating customers, such cassino will just wake up to change their terms of service at anytime without following though process or informing the customers of the casino.


Most of such casino are scam casinos, and also we have some other casinos that have taken the time to build a reputation for themselves by following all the rules and staying tith by following all the stipulated guidelines, this is the reason why when you are choosing a casino, you must take that time to fine out all the underlying factors and practice of the casino over time so as to be able to discover which is real and scam among the actor's.

[Dunamisx]

Most of such casino are scam casinos, and also we have some other casinos that have taken the time to build a reputation for themselves by following all the rules and staying tith by following all the stipulated guidelines, this is the reason why when you are choosing a casino, you must take that time to fine out all the underlying factors and practice of the casino over time so as to be able to discover which is real and scam among the actor's.

One of the most difficult task to do is in fighting an unknown enemy, this will give one a very tough time because you don't know them, how can you then strike for an attack back on them, gambling platforms are exactly like this, you don't know the good ones from the bad even when you make research about them, there's no certainty on what you may discover, but the simple way to stay safe is to always gamble with the amount of money we can afford to loose.

[Wiwo]

On top of this, one of the problems is that a lot of sites now use KYC as their excuse but were planning to steal the money anyways, so then you've given them your full identity and documents when they were already planning to scam, just making it more dangerous

Yes, in such a scenario, KYC is an element of risk assessment - whether your money can be stolen without problems or not. They evaluate first of all your jurisdiction - whether you can file a lawsuit against them. And only then being on sanctions lists and the like.

first of all, how to know a site that is following guidelines as long as kyc is concern is to check how much their performance have been in terms of frequent changing of the terms, and how the resolves issue's as regards and relate kyc and accounts restrictions are concerned, because alit of time that is the place where the while crisis starts from, since kyc arw triggered for a number of things which balance is one of such, e.g when gou want to make a withdrawal that is above $5000 you may be asked to verify your identity at that point.

So when you are asked, if you want to go through a kyc from a casino you shouldn't be confused since you agreed to that fact about the casino and how best their handle the issues with kyc and how best they follow it.

[ultrloa]

Most of such casino are scam casinos, and also we have some other casinos that have taken the time to build a reputation for themselves by following all the rules and staying tith by following all the stipulated guidelines, this is the reason why when you are choosing a casino, you must take that time to fine out all the underlying factors and practice of the casino over time so as to be able to discover which is real and scam among the actor's.

One of the most difficult task to do is in fighting an unknown enemy, this will give one a very tough time because you don't know them, how can you then strike for an attack back on them, gambling platforms are exactly like this, you don't know the good ones from the bad even when you make research about them, there's no certainty on what you may discover, but the simple way to stay safe is to always gamble with the amount of money we can afford to loose.

You will not go in thag condition if you just select the reputable in first place. Since you will only think fight against unknown enemy if you risk to much on new things since you think they are exciting or trying to avail those unrealistic bonus that they are offering. So minimize the risk for getting scam or facing any problems related to activities done I think the only practical solution there is never gamble to any unknown casino especially if they offer unreal conditions or situations so that we will not fall if they scam people who believe that they deliver. Also just like what you said we should gamble what we can afford to lose so that we will be fine if something bad happen especially if we commit bad decisions regarding on this activities.

[kotajikikox]

No KYC Crypto Casino or Casino that doesn’t require KYC at first but later on you will be ask once you already register and deposit some money. Most of the casino with Curaçao license has the tendency to apply KYC when they see fit base on the circumstances given to the user.

I doubt this casino that you listed will totally not apply KYC even with some special cases that user is showing some shady behavior in the casino. Only decentralized casino are the only true non kyc casino.

That is the right thinking here , they have not asking KYC when they are new or when you deposit but eventually as your need of withdrawals ? then questioning will come and yes KYC will happen and this is the first step in holding our funds.
So lets start adopting KYC than expecting this and that but after ? you are failing what you seems to be believing .
and besides KYC will be the thing of everything that  involves money sooner or later so why not practice this earlier for easy acceptance .

[KiaKia]

Sigh! How far can you run from casinos that have KYC requirements? It's better to consider such casinos instead of those that are hiding underground to run their casinos and using non kyc to lure people, this isn't Bitcoin that's decentralized and out of the government reach, this is a casino.

If you are still believing that a casino can run without been regulated then you are at a greater risks, because such casinos can decide to do anything, mostly when you won't see it coming, a regulated casino is still operating under the government papers, but a non regulated casino can't be fought by the law, it's like they don't even exist.

Be careful what you wish for, if you don't like passing KYC the only option left is to start going to located casino in your area to gamble, use the machines and take your leave after, no form of registration, no need for KYC verification.

[delfastTions]

<snip>

I think the same, people at some point will realize that they are ladders of a system that is always based on control by governments, by banks, because it is the need for money that makes everyone bow their heads and succumb to the imminent threats and with a lot of diplomacy that governments do, in this order of days I think it is as you say, things are Always directedTowards Control by governments, they always look for a way to get into things where they do not They have total freedom, I have seen how some regulations are established and that is something that many do not like, because the regulations are quite a lot of obstacles that are made so that people do not have freedom over financial activities, this comes down to the KYC requirements, the little requirements they set with crypto, with bitcoin, and the way to control them is by knowing who is managing these technologies to put it in their database and then make them start Paying higher taxes.

I don't know if in other countries the fact of playing in online casinos implies that they have to pay taxes, that is something that is not something that I see with good eyes for me these things have to look as ugly as possible, if I play in Anyway , if I register and want to play, why should I pay tax? Why do they have to oversee an Activity that is unrelated to a government? just for using cyypto? So sometimes I Understand very well those casino players who never Complied with their KYC , who do not play in casinos just so as not to leave their Identification there, that is something completely Understandable , I know that there is a lot of hope in the world who have a lot in bitcoin and they do not want any Government to know about their Finances and with all reason, they do not Want the government to take strong measures against those people, sometimes OTP Exchanges are very good because they Always make any action that is Difficult to do , possible through third parties.

When government agencies or those authorized by the state officially request or even require identity verification under the KYC procedure, it is at least clear that this is a requirement of the legislation of the relevant jurisdiction or the acceptance of international norms and regulations imposed by the global banking lobby by this jurisdiction. 
But if KYC is required by some casino, or for example by a crypto wallet operator like Blockchain.com, then this is simply a leak of confidential personal information.  And we all know examples of hacking of relevant personal information databases, such as the hacking of the Ledger order mailing database in 2019.  Then hundreds of thousands of users of this wallet were affected.  So, in any case, you should be careful about these issues of personal security and not thoughtlessly go through KYC whenever private business owners ask you to do so. 
And in gambling and crypto-casinos this is now becoming the norm, which, for example, just infuriates me.

[uchegod-21]

Sigh! How far can you run from casinos that have KYC requirements? It's better to consider such casinos instead of those that are hiding underground to run their casinos and using non kyc to lure people, this isn't Bitcoin that's decentralized and out of the government reach, this is a casino.

If you are still believing that a casino can run without been regulated then you are at a greater risks, because such casinos can decide to do anything, mostly when you won't see it coming, a regulated casino is still operating under the government papers, but a non regulated casino can't be fought by the law, it's like they don't even exist.

Be careful what you wish for, if you don't like passing KYC the only option left is to start going to located casino in your area to gamble, use the machines and take your leave after, no form of registration, no need for KYC verification.

Most gamblers do not even have any reason why they are running away from KYC. Even honest gamblers are now afraid of KYC. They might not be aware that the other man who is avoiding KYC might be looking for a way to cheat the system. It is difficult not easy to a completely non KYC casino. It is either the gambler wants to cheat the system or vice versa.

If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

[Sanitough]

If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

This must be the right mindset. We understand how the market is going now in terms of regulation, even Binance the biggest exchange paid a huge penalty for their violation, that's how regulators are very desperate in implementing the law, and it could also happen in the gambling industry.

A gambling site that advertises no to KYC is surely unregulated, but the question here, are you willing to risk big amount of money for this kind of gambling site? If your answer is yes, then this is the right site for you. However, I'm pretty sure that majority of gamblers will choose a regulated and reputable casino to trust their money, so this kind of site (no kyc) will just likely exist in the short period of time.

[iv4n]

...
If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

I believe that there will always be casinos that will be KYC-free, or at least without mandatory KYC, and I will stick with those casinos. But I agree that more regulations are coming and it will be tricky for many crypto casinos & services to avoid KYC rules, especially for the ones who aim big and wish to operate in the US and EU. Anyway, when dealing with money people should always be ready for KYC...

[uchegod-21]

If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

This must be the right mindset. We understand how the market is going now in terms of regulation, even Binance the biggest exchange paid a huge penalty for their violation, that's how regulators are very desperate in implementing the law, and it could also happen in the gambling industry.

That's it. Unless a casino does not want to be loud in the industry, they can do without regulations. if I may ask, who establishes a business and does not want it to flourish globally? It happened to Exchanges and also to mixers, casinos will not be a stumbling block.

...
If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

... especially for the ones who aim big and wish to operate in the US and EU. Anyway, when dealing with money people should always be ready for KYC...

I have to know why it is also US and EU while the internet is free. You can be hosted and registered in one African countries and still make wave elsewhere. What I'm I getting wrong?

[LUCKMCFLY]

If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

This must be the right mindset. We understand how the market is going now in terms of regulation, even Binance the biggest exchange paid a huge penalty for their violation, that's how regulators are very desperate in implementing the law, and it could also happen in the gambling industry.

A gambling site that advertises no to KYC is surely unregulated, but the question here, are you willing to risk big amount of money for this kind of gambling site? If your answer is yes, then this is the right site for you. However, I'm pretty sure that majority of gamblers will choose a regulated and reputable casino to trust their money, so this kind of site (no kyc) will just likely exist in the short period of time.

You are right, personally I have always seen cc asinso as a part of being able to do something better, the casinos that I trust are few in reality but in those casinos I have already completed my KYC, although to be honest when you are a customer of a particular casino They ask for very little KYC, I have seen that the new casinos always ask for KYC and it is difficult to get a casino that does not do the KYC, really hard, the casinos that are decentralized yes, but based on the things that we see, the Decentralized casinos have many considionces that many of us do not like, for example the fact of making any movement, that movement is not paid, we must admit that things with jkyc and lops casinos have different requirements.

It is well known that centralized casinos are much better than decentralized ones, for me they are the best, of course that also has its cost, and it is the KYC, I also understand that there are many players who do not want to give their data, I understand why mostly things when giving data is delicate, I think that no one likes to give their data, it is something unreasonable.

I have always made it clear that things cannot happen when you try to do them differently, because in the sense that you can take advantage of what a person can give for the best and best, as they have said, Binance gave a great sum, but Binance surrenders at the feet of any police or any government, they are capable of blocking the funds of an entire country if they want to do so so that they can carry out investigations, that is how it is, which I do not understand and the truth is something which I wouldn't do for anything in the world, now the things that are seen from the point of view of the casino, each one of them well I don't know if they will be like that with the players' data, some yes, some no, that's why I find the ones that are more reliable, I feel like I have more security in sending my data, of course that's my point of view.

[dansus021]

If we care so much about our data, we should just choose one reputable casino and complete kyc and stick with them for a very long time. More and more regulations are coming, making it impossible to avoid KYC

This must be the right mindset. We understand how the market is going now in terms of regulation, even Binance the biggest exchange paid a huge penalty for their violation, that's how regulators are very desperate in implementing the law, and it could also happen in the gambling industry.

A gambling site that advertises no to KYC is surely unregulated, but the question here, are you willing to risk big amount of money for this kind of gambling site? If your answer is yes, then this is the right site for you. However, I'm pretty sure that majority of gamblers will choose a regulated and reputable casino to trust their money, so this kind of site (no kyc) will just likely exist in the short period of time.

In my opinion, when the industry is growing we cant avoid the KYC sooner or later the government will come to everything and everyone they need money and they need to spend it even tho with all regulations they are still thirsty for money, take example of the US that has trillion of dollar debt but still need more.

So yeah the point is KYC will be there but I do believe crypto community is also built up against it. maybe in future the website that we know today is going to missing or dead because new rule from gov but they are gonna re-birth and the cycle is continue.

and I agree with you maybe we should comply with gov and do the KYC but after all there will be that doesn't like the gov and keep use non Kyc exchange or gambling site

[KosmoKisa]

Sigh! How far can you run from casinos that have KYC requirements? It's better to consider such casinos instead of those that are hiding underground to run their casinos and using non kyc to lure people, this isn't Bitcoin that's decentralized and out of the government reach, this is a casino.

If you are still believing that a casino can run without been regulated then you are at a greater risks, because such casinos can decide to do anything, mostly when you won't see it coming, a regulated casino is still operating under the government papers, but a non regulated casino can't be fought by the law, it's like they don't even exist.

Be careful what you wish for, if you don't like passing KYC the only option left is to start going to located casino in your area to gamble, use the machines and take your leave after, no form of registration, no need for KYC verification.

I have a generally positive attitude towards KYC. I voluntarily submit KYC information even when it's not mandatory. However, it's crucial to acknowledge that KYC requirements come with certain drawbacks. They can be time-consuming and inconvenient, and they can also make it more challenging for people to access gambling services. Additionally, there's a valid concern that KYC requirements could be used to discriminate against certain groups of people. Ultimately, it's essential to weigh the potential benefits of KYC against its drawbacks before deciding whether or not to use a regulated casino. I believe each individual should carefully consider the pros and cons of KYC before making a decision about using a regulated casino.

[8ombard]

Hi OP hope you're well,

I'm trying to list my site on your website however, I keep getting an error when I submit all my information (I'm not missing anything), if we could talk privately to resolve this problem that would be great.

Thanks.

[Ojima-ojo]

Most of such casino are scam casinos, and also we have some other casinos that have taken the time to build a reputation for themselves by following all the rules and staying tith by following all the stipulated guidelines, this is the reason why when you are choosing a casino, you must take that time to fine out all the underlying factors and practice of the casino over time so as to be able to discover which is real and scam among the actor's.

One of the most difficult tasks to do is in fighting an unknown enemy, this will give one a very tough time because you don't know them, how can you then strike for an attack back on them, gambling platforms are exactly like this, you don't know the good ones from the bad even when you make research about them, there's no certainty on what you may discover, but the simple way to stay safe is to always gamble with the amount of money we can afford to loose.

But at least when you pay close attention to details and also follow up with the development as they come, it will be easier for you to spot the good ones from the bad, and most times, these things are easy to spot, just like scammers are easy to spot only if you are not being greedy and getting carried away, so for that, we have to settle with that fact that spotting a shady casino is easier if you are a bit distracted or your focus is not on the bonuses that their promise you.


Most time the way the shade casinos get through to you is by offering too good to be true offers, and by so doing if you are smart enough,  you should be able to detect their plans and be able to save yourself from falling victim

[kotajikikox]

OP is being Online mostly but does not give a damn in this Thread of them , last post are from December but never address any questions here instead posting like a Bot.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3576430;sa=showPosts

Hi OP hope you're well,

I'm trying to list my site on your website however, I keep getting an error when I submit all my information (I'm not missing anything), if we could talk privately to resolve this problem that would be great.

Thanks.

Send Him a PM directly mate because OP is not showing here so direct PMming will help you solve the issue .

[LUCKMCFLY]

Most of such casino are scam casinos, and also we have some other casinos that have taken the time to build a reputation for themselves by following all the rules and staying tith by following all the stipulated guidelines, this is the reason why when you are choosing a casino, you must take that time to fine out all the underlying factors and practice of the casino over time so as to be able to discover which is real and scam among the actor's.

One of the most difficult tasks to do is in fighting an unknown enemy, this will give one a very tough time because you don't know them, how can you then strike for an attack back on them, gambling platforms are exactly like this, you don't know the good ones from the bad even when you make research about them, there's no certainty on what you may discover, but the simple way to stay safe is to always gamble with the amount of money we can afford to loose.

But at least when you pay close attention to details and also follow up with the development as they come, it will be easier for you to spot the good ones from the bad, and most times, these things are easy to spot, just like scammers are easy to spot only if you are not being greedy and getting carried away, so for that, we have to settle with that fact that spotting a shady casino is easier if you are a bit distracted or your focus is not on the bonuses that their promise you.


Most time the way the shade casinos get through to you is by offering too good to be true offers, and by so doing if you are smart enough,  you should be able to detect their plans and be able to save yourself from falling victim

Well, sometimes questioning casino players is good, because they force them to answer you, I am a person who is always looking for the opinion of people who have previously played in the casino, because they are the ones who can help us determine if the casino is worth it or not, it is true what they say, there are many casinos that when they are started behave very well and comply with all the rules, in fact they can be located among the casinos that have the most reputation, due to the clarity in their pertinent thing, bonuses, contests will always be Ways to Attract people to play, to make a difference, in this other order of things we are people who are always going to have to do things so that we can have the best experience and can generate many things, I could think that in this it is easier to resort to the opinions of those who have more Experience , to the advice that if they have been able to play, withdraw, not only the amounts that are small, but also the large profits would be good to see them, something like they do in some casinos.

We have all been witnesses of some winning plays, such as in the stakec.com story where they show very million-dollar profits and they do not hesitate to release that money directly to the majority of people, so we always told them what was best to do. It is being able to have security, the confidence of being able to be in a place with peace of mind that our funds are safe and that it will not go away from one day to the next, some time ago stake.com suffered a hack, obviously the casino was closed his withdrawal requests for a few hours, then everything was put Under control and continued Working , because he was not going to mess with or Compromise other people's funds in the casino to take them , some casinos have done Something like that, thing Which seems very bad to me , these casinos are more trustworthy and are not Capable of messing with their clients' funds.

[Odusko]

Hi OP hope you're well,

I'm trying to list my site on your website however, I keep getting an error when I submit all my information (I'm not missing anything), if we could talk privately to resolve this problem that would be great.

Thanks.

First thing first is your casino a no KYC casino and if yes can you at least share a link to where that is written in the terms and conditions of your casino, what the ops is looking for is and are no KYC casinos to at least help gambling community with that information.
But good to see that you already made efforts to contact the ops and in no time if you have a good offer, you guys will arrive at a good position that can see your site getting listed at the end.

[NoToKYC]

A new casino was added guys! BitStarz offers exclusively 30 Free Spins just on sign up

[delfastTions]

In the question that the OP asks by defining the name of this topic, in my opinion there is enough uncertainty. 
Therefore, it is probably worth bringing some clarity and a clear understanding of the ongoing identity verification processes. 
So, we can probably now conclude that practically no casino can afford not to mention KYC at all in their documents for the legalization of their work.  Including in ToS, of course.  And what do we have as a result: all casinos that secretly mention the obligation to verify the KYC procedure are disingenuous, or rather misinforming citizens.  This means that for us, players, consumers of their services, these casinos are legally in the so-called “gray zone”.  And for this it means that at any moment related to the transfer of our money, first of all, won at the casino, we can receive from the casino not money, but a KYC requirement.  For many players, remaining anonymous automatically means losing that money. 
My question to the OP is whether there is at least one casino that guarantees the absence of KYC under any circumstances.  Moreover, this guarantee is directly written down in the regulatory documents of the casino and in the ToS too.  Or are there simply no such casinos?  But if they are not there, then the topic itself and the OP website itself are simply meaningless and represent an elementary and primitive marketing technique to attract naive clientele and inexperienced players.  In this case, OP, I think, could tell us that the site is just another selection of casinos that are in the “gray zone” when it comes to KYC verification, and from which the player should always expect an “unexpected gift” in the form of sudden KYC.  But the fact is that any casino seems to either require KYC and warn about it, or is in a “gray zone” for reasons of using a fake “no KYC” as a marketing technique and nothing more.
 In short, such a selection of casinos “without KYC” is simply a pointless idea.

[panjul07]

A new casino was added guys! BitStarz offers exclusively 30 Free Spins just on sign up

Bitstarz has a bad reputation in this forum, didn't you notice it? Check this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=307265
What is the reason why you decided to add them on your list, they are even a casino that will ask their customer to do KYC most of the time especially when users take a bonus.
Do you care about the reputation of the casino or you ignore it as long as you can get benefit by adding the casino into your list?

[LUCKMCFLY]

In the question that the OP asks by defining the name of this topic, in my opinion there is enough uncertainty. 
Therefore, it is probably worth bringing some clarity and a clear understanding of the ongoing identity verification processes. 
So, we can probably now conclude that practically no casino can afford not to mention KYC at all in their documents for the legalization of their work.  Including in ToS, of course.  And what do we have as a result: all casinos that secretly mention the obligation to verify the KYC procedure are disingenuous, or rather misinforming citizens.  This means that for us, players, consumers of their services, these casinos are legally in the so-called “gray zone”.  And for this it means that at any moment related to the transfer of our money, first of all, won at the casino, we can receive from the casino not money, but a KYC requirement.  For many players, remaining anonymous automatically means losing that money. 
My question to the OP is whether there is at least one casino that guarantees the absence of KYC under any circumstances.  Moreover, this guarantee is directly written down in the regulatory documents of the casino and in the ToS too.  Or are there simply no such casinos?  But if they are not there, then the topic itself and the OP website itself are simply meaningless and represent an elementary and primitive marketing technique to attract naive clientele and inexperienced players.  In this case, OP, I think, could tell us that the site is just another selection of casinos that are in the “gray zone” when it comes to KYC verification, and from which the player should always expect an “unexpected gift” in the form of sudden KYC.  But the fact is that any casino seems to either require KYC and warn about it, or is in a “gray zone” for reasons of using a fake “no KYC” as a marketing technique and nothing more.
 In short, such a selection of casinos “without KYC” is simply a pointless idea.

I think the same, in fact one of the things I check this thread for is to see if I can find a casino that has the No KYC requirement, appreciated for privacy and anonymity because they have been very biased currently, I personally don't trust the casino that says yes KYC, because at some point they will say that they have to verify the identity, I don't remember in which forum thread they said that they did not ask KYC only to some random users but come on, we are not children, they can't be fooling us with those things, if they ask, ask and that's it, then sometimes casinos say that for a particular withdrawal they do not ask for KYC, but when it is a very large amount, yes, but that is something that we already know here, the essence and the goal of being a casino that does not require KYC.

For example, like freebitcoi.in, which until recently stopped being a non-KYC site, now you have to comply with it to make any withdrawal, so there are no casinos that do not require KYC, and for me it is a total shame. , because we have all always looked for this.

[delfastTions]

In the question that the OP asks by defining the name of this topic, in my opinion there is enough uncertainty. 
Therefore, it is probably worth bringing some clarity and a clear understanding of the ongoing identity verification processes. 
So, we can probably now conclude that practically no casino can afford not to mention KYC at all in their documents for the legalization of their work.  Including in ToS, of course.  And what do we have as a result: all casinos that secretly mention the obligation to verify the KYC procedure are disingenuous, or rather misinforming citizens.  This means that for us, players, consumers of their services, these casinos are legally in the so-called “gray zone”.  And for this it means that at any moment related to the transfer of our money, first of all, won at the casino, we can receive from the casino not money, but a KYC requirement.  For many players, remaining anonymous automatically means losing that money. 
My question to the OP is whether there is at least one casino that guarantees the absence of KYC under any circumstances.  Moreover, this guarantee is directly written down in the regulatory documents of the casino and in the ToS too.  Or are there simply no such casinos?  But if they are not there, then the topic itself and the OP website itself are simply meaningless and represent an elementary and primitive marketing technique to attract naive clientele and inexperienced players.  In this case, OP, I think, could tell us that the site is just another selection of casinos that are in the “gray zone” when it comes to KYC verification, and from which the player should always expect an “unexpected gift” in the form of sudden KYC.  But the fact is that any casino seems to either require KYC and warn about it, or is in a “gray zone” for reasons of using a fake “no KYC” as a marketing technique and nothing more.
 In short, such a selection of casinos “without KYC” is simply a pointless idea.

I think the same, in fact one of the things I check this thread for is to see if I can find a casino that has the No KYC requirement, appreciated for privacy and anonymity because they have been very biased currently, I personally don't trust the casino that says yes KYC, because at some point they will say that they have to verify the identity, I don't remember in which forum thread they said that they did not ask KYC only to some random users but come on, we are not children, they can't be fooling us with those things, if they ask, ask and that's it, then sometimes casinos say that for a particular withdrawal they do not ask for KYC, but when it is a very large amount, yes, but that is something that we already know here, the essence and the goal of being a casino that does not require KYC.

For example, like freebitcoi.in, which until recently stopped being a non-KYC site, now you have to comply with it to make any withdrawal, so there are no casinos that do not require KYC, and for me it is a total shame. , because we have all always looked for this.

Yeah.  For all players, the time has now come when we all have become confident that we will not be able to find a single casino that is not a fly-by-night casino, or even more so a scam, and when playing in such a casino, under no circumstances will it require KYC.  In my opinion, all casinos have already written relevant clauses in their ToS stating that in some cases they may require KYC.  But all these points of the casino game rules are written so vaguely and vaguely that there is no clear picture in which case you can do without KYC.  Moreover, even if the withdrawal amounts and your wallet are small, less than the limit set by the casino, usually $2K, then the casino may require KYC.  In general, anonymity when gambling has fallen on hard times.  It can be stated that anonymity is dying. 
Therefore, the topic that OP opened becomes meaningless.

[arwin100]

A new casino was added guys! BitStarz offers exclusively 30 Free Spins just on sign up

Bitstarz has a bad reputation in this forum, didn't you notice it? Check this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=307265
What is the reason why you decided to add them on your list, they are even a casino that will ask their customer to do KYC most of the time especially when users take a bonus.
Do you care about the reputation of the casino or you ignore it as long as you can get benefit by adding the casino into your list?

Maybe they are not doing any research on scam accusation section that's why they include that scam casino on their list. Or maybe they just really don't care about its reputation and just try to get money out of referral or payment coming from casino itself.

If they research the bitstarz keyword on scam accusation board there's a lot of threads posted against this casino that's why its crazy that they didn't know that those accusation exist.  For doing that they lose their credibility since they failed to define what is scam casino and what are those legit also best to add on the list.

[LUCKMCFLY]

<snip>

Well, we are people who are always going to see things in the sense that they can bring us benefits, I think that many do not like the idea of leaving their identification, just as there must be people who don't care about leaving their data, it doesn't matter to them. , but when it comes to money, I think one has to be jealous and careful with things, because basically things with their way of seeing money can be different, for example leaving a KYC in a casino implies risks, a hack or something like that, it can be assumed that this data falls into the hands of criminals, they find the addresses, they find the account balances, and they can use that information to intimidate, and although I see the governments almost or equal to the criminals, but with a tie, because for me they are the same, because if they do not fall into the hands of criminals, they will fall into the hands of governments that also in the near future will take advantage of those who carry out operations with crypto, and manifest themselves through taxes.

This scenario is one that the People cannot imagine, perhaps they can say that one is exaggerating, but things are like that, personally, privacy and anonymity are rights that no longer exist, and the worst thing is that people do not They realize it, and if they realize it, then they ignore it, and they don't give them importance, that's why in the world there are so many people who appear dead and we don't know why? What happened? Or what did they do, sometimes we don't know about people's deaths? Some say that the person owed money or was involved in strange things, but it could be that things were like this because of a hack on some platform and from there they extracted that information, I think that people currently do not give importance to this.

[freedomgo]

A new casino was added guys! BitStarz offers exclusively 30 Free Spins just on sign up

Bitstarz has a bad reputation in this forum, didn't you notice it? Check this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=307265
What is the reason why you decided to add them on your list, they are even a casino that will ask their customer to do KYC most of the time especially when users take a bonus.
Do you care about the reputation of the casino or you ignore it as long as you can get benefit by adding the casino into your list?

Maybe they are not doing any research on scam accusation section that's why they include that scam casino on their list. Or maybe they just really don't care about its reputation and just try to get money out of referral or payment coming from casino itself.

If they research the bitstarz keyword on scam accusation board there's a lot of threads posted against this casino that's why its crazy that they didn't know that those accusation exist.  For doing that they lose their credibility since they failed to define what is scam casino and what are those legit also best to add on the list.

The scam accusation was 4 years ago; hopefully, a lot of things have already changed for this casino. But there's a valid reason to call them scammers since their response or action does not solve the problem that was raised with valid evidence. Of course, DT members would not support that flag created against them if the evidence isn't valid enough.

[iv4n]

The scam accusation was 4 years ago; hopefully, a lot of things have already changed for this casino. But there's a valid reason to call them scammers since their response or action does not solve the problem that was raised with valid evidence. Of course, DT members would not support that flag created against them if the evidence isn't valid enough.

I tried logging into my account a while ago, but they no longer accept players from my country... so some things have definitely changed. My experience is only positive, 7-8 years ago Bitstarz was one of the few places with a very long list of providers and slots, unique for that time, it's the place where I won a few "whole BTC" from slots.

Anyway, the Bitstarz team decided not to show up here a long time ago, but they didn't stop advertising in other places. I guess it's their loss, most of us here don't play in casinos that don't have an active representative here on the forum.

[ScamViruS]

The scam accusation was 4 years ago; hopefully, a lot of things have already changed for this casino. But there's a valid reason to call them scammers since their response or action does not solve the problem that was raised with valid evidence. Of course, DT members would not support that flag created against them if the evidence isn't valid enough.

They have not settled the accusation for so many years now they may be interested or not to settle the accusation. If a casino sees any accusations against them they try to settle it, because they are serious about their business. But this casino is not interested in giving a proper reply to any accusations created against them. So gamblers must try to avoid this casino, so as not to face problems after deposit money in this casino. bitstars.net was active in this forum on April 23, 2020, 06:57:58 AM, after that they are no longer active in this forum. That means they realize they can't continue their scams from this forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=307265

[delfastTions]

<snip>

Well, we are people who are always going to see things in the sense that they can bring us benefits, I think that many do not like the idea of leaving their identification, just as there must be people who don't care about leaving their data, it doesn't matter to them. , but when it comes to money, I think one has to be jealous and careful with things, because basically things with their way of seeing money can be different, for example leaving a KYC in a casino implies risks, a hack or something like that, it can be assumed that this data falls into the hands of criminals, they find the addresses, they find the account balances, and they can use that information to intimidate, and although I see the governments almost or equal to the criminals, but with a tie, because for me they are the same, because if they do not fall into the hands of criminals, they will fall into the hands of governments that also in the near future will take advantage of those who carry out operations with crypto, and manifest themselves through taxes.

This scenario is one that the People cannot imagine, perhaps they can say that one is exaggerating, but things are like that, personally, privacy and anonymity are rights that no longer exist, and the worst thing is that people do not They realize it, and if they realize it, then they ignore it, and they don't give them importance, that's why in the world there are so many people who appear dead and we don't know why? What happened? Or what did they do, sometimes we don't know about people's deaths? Some say that the person owed money or was involved in strange things, but it could be that things were like this because of a hack on some platform and from there they extracted that information, I think that people currently do not give importance to this.

It should be noted that in global practice there are still areas of human life in which the right to anonymity is even legally enshrined.  I mean the privacy of people's Personal Health Information.  This area even provides for administrative liability for the disclosure of such data.  Thus, it is still worth stating that such medical data is a secret that a person can keep.  And this is even guaranteed by law.  But when it comes to payments in cryptocurrencies, since there are still intersections with fiat money, this right to privacy is completely ignored by governments and, on the contrary, under the guise of taxation, the requirement for personal identification using KYC is being introduced everywhere.
 But I thought that KYC in the form that everyone is used to is now hopelessly outdated.  For example, a photo of a person holding documents in their hands is a completely outdated method and should always be ignored if possible.

[fullhdpixel]

It should be noted that in global practice there are still areas of human life in which the right to anonymity is even legally enshrined.  I mean the privacy of people's Personal Health Information.  This area even provides for administrative liability for the disclosure of such data.  Thus, it is still worth stating that such medical data is a secret that a person can keep.  And this is even guaranteed by law.  But when it comes to payments in cryptocurrencies, since there are still intersections with fiat money, this right to privacy is completely ignored by governments and, on the contrary, under the guise of taxation, the requirement for personal identification using KYC is being introduced everywhere.
 But I thought that KYC in the form that everyone is used to is now hopelessly outdated.  For example, a photo of a person holding documents in their hands is a completely outdated method and should always be ignored if possible.

I think there is nothing much in health information and they are seem less important when we play gambling compared to the food and medical industry, or the likes, no wonder why they are not being asked anymore when we submit our KYC in a casino. Cryptos are still money but they are mostly decentralized so privacy is still there. KYC was introduced not mainly because of taxation but it's about money laundering and then preventing certain people to access the casino as they maybe underage or they are from restricted locations.

When it comes to how KYC is being processed, I don't think a person holding a document is outdated and will ever be outdated because we have been doing this long time ago (if I'm not mistaken) and if you ignore them, it's going to be your loss and not by the platform.

[delfastTions]

It should be noted that in global practice there are still areas of human life in which the right to anonymity is even legally enshrined.  I mean the privacy of people's Personal Health Information.  This area even provides for administrative liability for the disclosure of such data.  Thus, it is still worth stating that such medical data is a secret that a person can keep.  And this is even guaranteed by law.  But when it comes to payments in cryptocurrencies, since there are still intersections with fiat money, this right to privacy is completely ignored by governments and, on the contrary, under the guise of taxation, the requirement for personal identification using KYC is being introduced everywhere.
 But I thought that KYC in the form that everyone is used to is now hopelessly outdated.  For example, a photo of a person holding documents in their hands is a completely outdated method and should always be ignored if possible.

I think there is nothing much in health information and they are seem less important when we play gambling compared to the food and medical industry, or the likes, no wonder why they are not being asked anymore when we submit our KYC in a casino. Cryptos are still money but they are mostly decentralized so privacy is still there. KYC was introduced not mainly because of taxation but it's about money laundering and then preventing certain people to access the casino as they maybe underage or they are from restricted locations.

When it comes to how KYC is being processed, I don't think a person holding a document is outdated and will ever be outdated because we have been doing this long time ago (if I'm not mistaken) and if you ignore them, it's going to be your loss and not by the platform.

All such information about human health is quite important classified information.  It is not for nothing that the concept of “medical confidentiality” has long existed.  And doctors are obliged to keep such information strictly confidential.  By the way, this is due to the fact that some diseases can negatively affect the search for work and employment with an employer, that is, negative consequences on a person’s private life are quite possible. 

As for KYC in any of its manifestations, I continue to believe that when it comes to payments in cryptocurrency, there should be no KYC at all.  As for this notorious fight against money laundering, it must be said that initially no money and no cryptocurrencies are “dirty”.  This money was simply used by criminals for criminal purposes, law enforcement officers should not “dirty” the money, but should catch criminals red-handed, for example, with a drug party or traffickers.  But this is difficult and dangerous, and law enforcement officers themselves came up with this very “money laundering” to make their work and life easier. 
And the “financial crimes” block is a separate topic for a long conversation.  And as a result of such a conversation, it becomes clear that “dirty” money simply does not exist.

[EarnOnVictor]

A new casino was added guys! BitStarz offers exclusively 30 Free Spins just on sign up

Bitstarz has a bad reputation in this forum, didn't you notice it? Check this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=307265
What is the reason why you decided to add them on your list, they are even a casino that will ask their customer to do KYC most of the time especially when users take a bonus.
Do you care about the reputation of the casino or you ignore it as long as you can get benefit by adding the casino into your list?

I was also surprised to see the name among the list of the OP, which is absurd, to say the least. Well, I believe the OP is just doing his business by simply directing traffic to his website, that is the main goal here and not so concerned about the integrity/reputation of the casinos, not to mention the safety of the funds of the directed customers. The BitStarz is not even the name that only has a bad reputation on the forum but also has a bad reputation online, the OP can't tell me that he did not know this unless he doesn't just care since it is all about business.

Although the OP did not add the reputation/reliability of the company to be advertised in his criteria, so he can still be exonerated here. It is those who are reading and following that should be more careful. Imagine dealing with no-KYC casinos, are you not the one who is putting the hook on your neck by yourself? Best of luck to their next victims through the OP.

It's worth sharing that I have tried my best since I joined the Bitcointalk forum not to advertise for m!xers and any company of questionable characters. That is what I call integrity. I think we should also be considering the humanitarian aspect as well and not selfishly about the money coming to us alone.

[LUCKMCFLY]

It should be noted that in global practice there are still areas of human life in which the right to anonymity is even legally enshrined.  I mean the privacy of people's Personal Health Information.  This area even provides for administrative liability for the disclosure of such data.  Thus, it is still worth stating that such medical data is a secret that a person can keep.  And this is even guaranteed by law.  But when it comes to payments in cryptocurrencies, since there are still intersections with fiat money, this right to privacy is completely ignored by governments and, on the contrary, under the guise of taxation, the requirement for personal identification using KYC is being introduced everywhere.
 But I thought that KYC in the form that everyone is used to is now hopelessly outdated.  For example, a photo of a person holding documents in their hands is a completely outdated method and should always be ignored if possible.

I think there is nothing much in health information and they are seem less important when we play gambling compared to the food and medical industry, or the likes, no wonder why they are not being asked anymore when we submit our KYC in a casino. Cryptos are still money but they are mostly decentralized so privacy is still there. KYC was introduced not mainly because of taxation but it's about money laundering and then preventing certain people to access the casino as they maybe underage or they are from restricted locations.

When it comes to how KYC is being processed, I don't think a person holding a document is outdated and will ever be outdated because we have been doing this long time ago (if I'm not mistaken) and if you ignore them, it's going to be your loss and not by the platform.

All such information about human health is quite important classified information.  It is not for nothing that the concept of “medical confidentiality” has long existed.  And doctors are obliged to keep such information strictly confidential.  By the way, this is due to the fact that some diseases can negatively affect the search for work and employment with an employer, that is, negative consequences on a person’s private life are quite possible. 

As for KYC in any of its manifestations, I continue to believe that when it comes to payments in cryptocurrency, there should be no KYC at all.  As for this notorious fight against money laundering, it must be said that initially no money and no cryptocurrencies are “dirty”.  This money was simply used by criminals for criminal purposes, law enforcement officers should not “dirty” the money, but should catch criminals red-handed, for example, with a drug party or traffickers.  But this is difficult and dangerous, and law enforcement officers themselves came up with this very “money laundering” to make their work and life easier. 
And the “financial crimes” block is a separate topic for a long conversation.  And as a result of such a conversation, it becomes clear that “dirty” money simply does not exist.

This topic is beginning to give rise to a lot of debate, but personally we know that this right to privacy and anonymity is biased, now things are not as before, the obgienros saw the way to be able to enter into cryptocurrency issues Through these regulations and those regulations are to remove anonymity for them to control those who carry out operations with crypto in order to be able to charge them large sums of money for taxes, that is the secret of things, then since this is already known, now they want to put the things like that, in the caisnos everything that is privacy should be defended, anonymously that is a very important thing, especially for me who attach importance to these things, I have always believed that we should be a little more irreverent with the fact of KYC in the casinos, because for everything it is KYC, in the Excahnges, it is Mandatory KYC, and that data belongs there.

The truth is that I Really liked the comparison that was made with the data of the people who are in the medical service, if something like this existed it would be Different , but this is in the Hands of governments, of bank entities, so in the hands of whoever is going to Will our data remain if a gambling site is or becomes involved in a possible hack and does the government take action? As our data Shows, the consequences are already seen in level 1A exchanges, in Binance if they have to block funds from the Eprona for 1 day, a sign, they do it if the police of some country ask them to do all the embarrassments, and we don't know if they are Just ´People in their database to add it to theirs, these things are very likely to happen, that's why we are not just People who are always going to see things from the right perspective. sense of Everything, and we Should not be so trusting, that leaving the KYC generates more security , that is pure Lies , that is to Control all those who do or transact with crypto.

[delfastTions]

It should be noted that in global practice there are still areas of human life in which the right to anonymity is even legally enshrined.  I mean the privacy of people's Personal Health Information.  This area even provides for administrative liability for the disclosure of such data.  Thus, it is still worth stating that such medical data is a secret that a person can keep.  And this is even guaranteed by law.  But when it comes to payments in cryptocurrencies, since there are still intersections with fiat money, this right to privacy is completely ignored by governments and, on the contrary, under the guise of taxation, the requirement for personal identification using KYC is being introduced everywhere.
 But I thought that KYC in the form that everyone is used to is now hopelessly outdated.  For example, a photo of a person holding documents in their hands is a completely outdated method and should always be ignored if possible.

I think there is nothing much in health information and they are seem less important when we play gambling compared to the food and medical industry, or the likes, no wonder why they are not being asked anymore when we submit our KYC in a casino. Cryptos are still money but they are mostly decentralized so privacy is still there. KYC was introduced not mainly because of taxation but it's about money laundering and then preventing certain people to access the casino as they maybe underage or they are from restricted locations.

When it comes to how KYC is being processed, I don't think a person holding a document is outdated and will ever be outdated because we have been doing this long time ago (if I'm not mistaken) and if you ignore them, it's going to be your loss and not by the platform.

All such information about human health is quite important classified information.  It is not for nothing that the concept of “medical confidentiality” has long existed.  And doctors are obliged to keep such information strictly confidential.  By the way, this is due to the fact that some diseases can negatively affect the search for work and employment with an employer, that is, negative consequences on a person’s private life are quite possible. 

As for KYC in any of its manifestations, I continue to believe that when it comes to payments in cryptocurrency, there should be no KYC at all.  As for this notorious fight against money laundering, it must be said that initially no money and no cryptocurrencies are “dirty”.  This money was simply used by criminals for criminal purposes, law enforcement officers should not “dirty” the money, but should catch criminals red-handed, for example, with a drug party or traffickers.  But this is difficult and dangerous, and law enforcement officers themselves came up with this very “money laundering” to make their work and life easier. 
And the “financial crimes” block is a separate topic for a long conversation.  And as a result of such a conversation, it becomes clear that “dirty” money simply does not exist.

This topic is beginning to give rise to a lot of debate, but personally we know that this right to privacy and anonymity is biased, now things are not as before, the obgienros saw the way to be able to enter into cryptocurrency issues Through these regulations and those regulations are to remove anonymity for them to control those who carry out operations with crypto in order to be able to charge them large sums of money for taxes, that is the secret of things, then since this is already known, now they want to put the things like that, in the caisnos everything that is privacy should be defended, anonymously that is a very important thing, especially for me who attach importance to these things, I have always believed that we should be a little more irreverent with the fact of KYC in the casinos, because for everything it is KYC, in the Excahnges, it is Mandatory KYC, and that data belongs there.

The truth is that I Really liked the comparison that was made with the data of the people who are in the medical service, if something like this existed it would be Different , but this is in the Hands of governments, of bank entities, so in the hands of whoever is going to Will our data remain if a gambling site is or becomes involved in a possible hack and does the government take action? As our data Shows, the consequences are already seen in level 1A exchanges, in Binance if they have to block funds from the Eprona for 1 day, a sign, they do it if the police of some country ask them to do all the embarrassments, and we don't know if they are Just ´People in their database to add it to theirs, these things are very likely to happen, that's why we are not just People who are always going to see things from the right perspective. sense of Everything, and we Should not be so trusting, that leaving the KYC generates more security , that is pure Lies , that is to Control all those who do or transact with crypto.

In my opinion, if a person who uses cryptocurrency payments and has non-custodial wallets with cryptocurrency, which he honestly earned, is offered a centralized service with KYC and a similar one without KYC verification, then such a person will most likely understand that a service without KYC is preferable for him. 
True, here on the forum, some users are confident that KYC gives them some kind of security and a guarantee of saving their money.  And it is also needed to combat fraud and combat money laundering.  But I think that, on the contrary, disclosing complete information about a person, a casino player, in this particular case, on the contrary, reduces the safety of such a person.  Information about his cryptocurrency may well attract money extortionists and criminals using blackmail.  Yes, even additional measures for declaring cryptocurrency take up your precious time and often this all irritates both you and your loved ones.  By the way, KYC also takes up your time.  In general, now, with this level of development of digital technology, there is no difficulty in identifying a specific person if it is really necessary.  And this does not require any KYC, as was the case 10 years ago.

 I continue to argue that in general KYC is morally outdated and should begin to completely die out, as an unnecessary, superfluous and stupid procedure.

[LUCKMCFLY]

It should be noted that in global practice there are still areas of human life in which the right to anonymity is even legally enshrined.  I mean the privacy of people's Personal Health Information.  This area even provides for administrative liability for the disclosure of such data.  Thus, it is still worth stating that such medical data is a secret that a person can keep.  And this is even guaranteed by law.  But when it comes to payments in cryptocurrencies, since there are still intersections with fiat money, this right to privacy is completely ignored by governments and, on the contrary, under the guise of taxation, the requirement for personal identification using KYC is being introduced everywhere.
 But I thought that KYC in the form that everyone is used to is now hopelessly outdated.  For example, a photo of a person holding documents in their hands is a completely outdated method and should always be ignored if possible.

I think there is nothing much in health information and they are seem less important when we play gambling compared to the food and medical industry, or the likes, no wonder why they are not being asked anymore when we submit our KYC in a casino. Cryptos are still money but they are mostly decentralized so privacy is still there. KYC was introduced not mainly because of taxation but it's about money laundering and then preventing certain people to access the casino as they maybe underage or they are from restricted locations.

When it comes to how KYC is being processed, I don't think a person holding a document is outdated and will ever be outdated because we have been doing this long time ago (if I'm not mistaken) and if you ignore them, it's going to be your loss and not by the platform.

All such information about human health is quite important classified information.  It is not for nothing that the concept of “medical confidentiality” has long existed.  And doctors are obliged to keep such information strictly confidential.  By the way, this is due to the fact that some diseases can negatively affect the search for work and employment with an employer, that is, negative consequences on a person’s private life are quite possible. 

As for KYC in any of its manifestations, I continue to believe that when it comes to payments in cryptocurrency, there should be no KYC at all.  As for this notorious fight against money laundering, it must be said that initially no money and no cryptocurrencies are “dirty”.  This money was simply used by criminals for criminal purposes, law enforcement officers should not “dirty” the money, but should catch criminals red-handed, for example, with a drug party or traffickers.  But this is difficult and dangerous, and law enforcement officers themselves came up with this very “money laundering” to make their work and life easier. 
And the “financial crimes” block is a separate topic for a long conversation.  And as a result of such a conversation, it becomes clear that “dirty” money simply does not exist.

This topic is beginning to give rise to a lot of debate, but personally we know that this right to privacy and anonymity is biased, now things are not as before, the obgienros saw the way to be able to enter into cryptocurrency issues Through these regulations and those regulations are to remove anonymity for them to control those who carry out operations with crypto in order to be able to charge them large sums of money for taxes, that is the secret of things, then since this is already known, now they want to put the things like that, in the caisnos everything that is privacy should be defended, anonymously that is a very important thing, especially for me who attach importance to these things, I have always believed that we should be a little more irreverent with the fact of KYC in the casinos, because for everything it is KYC, in the Excahnges, it is Mandatory KYC, and that data belongs there.

The truth is that I Really liked the comparison that was made with the data of the people who are in the medical service, if something like this existed it would be Different , but this is in the Hands of governments, of bank entities, so in the hands of whoever is going to Will our data remain if a gambling site is or becomes involved in a possible hack and does the government take action? As our data Shows, the consequences are already seen in level 1A exchanges, in Binance if they have to block funds from the Eprona for 1 day, a sign, they do it if the police of some country ask them to do all the embarrassments, and we don't know if they are Just ´People in their database to add it to theirs, these things are very likely to happen, that's why we are not just People who are always going to see things from the right perspective. sense of Everything, and we Should not be so trusting, that leaving the KYC generates more security , that is pure Lies , that is to Control all those who do or transact with crypto.

In my opinion, if a person who uses cryptocurrency payments and has non-custodial wallets with cryptocurrency, which he honestly earned, is offered a centralized service with KYC and a similar one without KYC verification, then such a person will most likely understand that a service without KYC is preferable for him. 
True, here on the forum, some users are confident that KYC gives them some kind of security and a guarantee of saving their money.  And it is also needed to combat fraud and combat money laundering.  But I think that, on the contrary, disclosing complete information about a person, a casino player, in this particular case, on the contrary, reduces the safety of such a person.  Information about his cryptocurrency may well attract money extortionists and criminals using blackmail.  Yes, even additional measures for declaring cryptocurrency take up your precious time and often this all irritates both you and your loved ones.  By the way, KYC also takes up your time.  In general, now, with this level of development of digital technology, there is no difficulty in identifying a specific person if it is really necessary.  And this does not require any KYC, as was the case 10 years ago.

 I continue to argue that in general KYC is morally outdated and should begin to completely die out, as an unnecessary, superfluous and stupid procedure.

What he says is very true, if a casino verifies that the deposit is from a wallet they should not ask for any type of KYC, since if it is from a verified address from an exchange then those reasons can be very different, there it is not possible to approve things are good, because the origin of the funds is repeated, and the casino does not care where the person got the funds from and that is all that should be done, therefore that could be a solution that the casinos should take into consideration , because the journey is not bad.

But I don't know how the casinos can put that clause in their Rivers, that would imply that they redraft it, and that they only give exclusive use to this type of thing, but that would be a very good start, I don't know if the casinos accept something like that , because as I have always said, good things are very few.

Now about the conceptualization and seduction that they have done in favor of KYC, which is more beneficial, well, the truth is, I don't believe that lie for anything, it is obvious that that has nothing to do with it, a person in an exchange, casino, or wherever, it is located faster through an ID that is generated, not by its name, it is a sexualization of things, so I don't like that image they give either, in fact, I have seen people who define the KYC, and they are Legendary , which surprises me.

[delfastTions]

~ snip ~

~ snip ~

~ snip ~

~ snip ~

In my opinion, if a person who uses cryptocurrency payments and has non-custodial wallets with cryptocurrency, which he honestly earned, is offered a centralized service with KYC and a similar one without KYC verification, then such a person will most likely understand that a service without KYC is preferable for him. 
True, here on the forum, some users are confident that KYC gives them some kind of security and a guarantee of saving their money.  And it is also needed to combat fraud and combat money laundering.  But I think that, on the contrary, disclosing complete information about a person, a casino player, in this particular case, on the contrary, reduces the safety of such a person.  Information about his cryptocurrency may well attract money extortionists and criminals using blackmail.  Yes, even additional measures for declaring cryptocurrency take up your precious time and often this all irritates both you and your loved ones.  By the way, KYC also takes up your time.  In general, now, with this level of development of digital technology, there is no difficulty in identifying a specific person if it is really necessary.  And this does not require any KYC, as was the case 10 years ago.

 I continue to argue that in general KYC is morally outdated and should begin to completely die out, as an unnecessary, superfluous and stupid procedure.

What he says is very true, if a casino verifies that the deposit is from a wallet they should not ask for any type of KYC, since if it is from a verified address from an exchange then those reasons can be very different, there it is not possible to approve things are good, because the origin of the funds is repeated, and the casino does not care where the person got the funds from and that is all that should be done, therefore that could be a solution that the casinos should take into consideration , because the journey is not bad.

But I don't know how the casinos can put that clause in their Rivers, that would imply that they redraft it, and that they only give exclusive use to this type of thing, but that would be a very good start, I don't know if the casinos accept something like that , because as I have always said, good things are very few.

Now about the conceptualization and seduction that they have done in favor of KYC, which is more beneficial, well, the truth is, I don't believe that lie for anything, it is obvious that that has nothing to do with it, a person in an exchange, casino, or wherever, it is located faster through an ID that is generated, not by its name, it is a sexualization of things, so I don't like that image they give either, in fact, I have seen people who define the KYC, and they are Legendary , which surprises me.

In general, the world of civilized countries is now so filled with all kinds of surveillance means, video cameras and, above all, digital personal identification technologies have advanced so much that probably in practice any person in such conditions of an urban agglomeration is almost constantly under surveillance.  Total surveillance has already developed so much that even a few years ago in the same SF, for example, there were mass protests against the total surveillance of people using video surveillance and the movement of people corresponding to the software processing of databases. 
Naturally, in such conditions, KYC ceases to be relevant at all, simply because as soon as you log into your computer or mobile phone, it already becomes known that it is you.  And why else is KYC needed here?  This is the side of personal identification under the KYC procedure that I’m talking about.  They are clearly outdated, it becomes unnecessary and only takes away your precious time for nonsense. 
Well, your Personal Data can also be considered simply distributed by you all over the world because it will definitely be stolen by hackers or sold by a corrupt employee of a casino, exchange, bank or any such organization.

[LUCKMCFLY]

In general, the world of civilized countries is now so filled with all kinds of surveillance means, video cameras and, above all, digital personal identification technologies have advanced so much that probably in practice any person in such conditions of an urban agglomeration is almost constantly under surveillance.  Total surveillance has already developed so much that even a few years ago in the same SF, for example, there were mass protests against the total surveillance of people using video surveillance and the movement of people corresponding to the software processing of databases. 
Naturally, in such conditions, KYC ceases to be relevant at all, simply because as soon as you log into your computer or mobile phone, it already becomes known that it is you.  And why else is KYC needed here?  This is the side of personal identification under the KYC procedure that I’m talking about.  They are clearly outdated, it becomes unnecessary and only takes away your precious time for nonsense. 
Well, your Personal Data can also be considered simply distributed by you all over the world because it will definitely be stolen by hackers or sold by a corrupt employee of a casino, exchange, bank or any such organization.

It is very true, in fact this issue of privacy and anonymity has been uncovered for many years and in a great way when the great Edward Snowden did it and launched it to the world, where he made Obama see that he used it to basically spy, which had that program and they used it as the eye of God, then these things are true, the digital age includes videos and cameras everywhere, it is something that the world, especially the most developed countries, have, however, to Sometimes insist to the casino that they do not ask us for so many KYC requirements, because the only thing you can think of is that if this data is hacked, leaked or something like that, it could fall into the hands of criminals who can come to your house. , and if they see that a lot of money is being handled in crypto, they can intimidate you and even kill you, in certain countries this has happened and honestly it is something very serious and that danger should not be taken lightly.

There are criminals who only need to provide people's data to get to their homes, so hearing that can lead to rejection of KYC. As they say here in a saying: "Better safe than sorry", that's why there are so many players who They stopped playing in the casinos just because of the KYC, since they did not like to leave information about themselves in the casinos, in my particular case since I am not a whale or anything like that I think I would not be in danger, but in the same way a criminal It can give us a bad time and that must be avoided.

[delfastTions]

In general, the world of civilized countries is now so filled with all kinds of surveillance means, video cameras and, above all, digital personal identification technologies have advanced so much that probably in practice any person in such conditions of an urban agglomeration is almost constantly under surveillance.  Total surveillance has already developed so much that even a few years ago in the same SF, for example, there were mass protests against the total surveillance of people using video surveillance and the movement of people corresponding to the software processing of databases. 
Naturally, in such conditions, KYC ceases to be relevant at all, simply because as soon as you log into your computer or mobile phone, it already becomes known that it is you.  And why else is KYC needed here?  This is the side of personal identification under the KYC procedure that I’m talking about.  They are clearly outdated, it becomes unnecessary and only takes away your precious time for nonsense. 
Well, your Personal Data can also be considered simply distributed by you all over the world because it will definitely be stolen by hackers or sold by a corrupt employee of a casino, exchange, bank or any such organization.

It is very true, in fact this issue of privacy and anonymity has been uncovered for many years and in a great way when the great Edward Snowden did it and launched it to the world, where he made Obama see that he used it to basically spy, which had that program and they used it as the eye of God, then these things are true, the digital age includes videos and cameras everywhere, it is something that the world, especially the most developed countries, have, however, to Sometimes insist to the casino that they do not ask us for so many KYC requirements, because the only thing you can think of is that if this data is hacked, leaked or something like that, it could fall into the hands of criminals who can come to your house. , and if they see that a lot of money is being handled in crypto, they can intimidate you and even kill you, in certain countries this has happened and honestly it is something very serious and that danger should not be taken lightly.

There are criminals who only need to provide people's data to get to their homes, so hearing that can lead to rejection of KYC. As they say here in a saying: "Better safe than sorry", that's why there are so many players who They stopped playing in the casinos just because of the KYC, since they did not like to leave information about themselves in the casinos, in my particular case since I am not a whale or anything like that I think I would not be in danger, but in the same way a criminal It can give us a bad time and that must be avoided.

It seems to me that often criminals can start blackmailing ordinary people who are not millionaires or cryptocurrency whales but who simply somehow provided their personal data (including their address where they live) as part of the KYC procedure at some crypto casino, and these  the data was stolen and made public on the network. 
After all, the very fact that a player has a cryptocurrency can already indicate that the person has this cryptocurrency, and the fact that he plays in a casino means that he can afford to lose this cryptocurrency.  So the criminal figures out that he can blackmail such a cryptocurrency owner.  And in the process of the crime, find out how much money his victim has. 
So it turns out that the very fact of playing in a casino using cryptocurrency and de-anonymizing the player using KYC is already a potential criminogenic factor and poses a danger to human safety.  And of course, law enforcement agencies must fight such manifestations of crime and extortion.
 And not just fight after a crime has been committed, but carry out preventive measures.
 And by the way, maintaining the anonymity of the player and the absence of public data about him on the Internet is a very high-quality type of counteraction and prevention of this type of crime.

[LUCKMCFLY]

It seems to me that often criminals can start blackmailing ordinary people who are not millionaires or cryptocurrency whales but who simply somehow provided their personal data (including their address where they live) as part of the KYC procedure at some crypto casino, and these  the data was stolen and made public on the network. 
After all, the very fact that a player has a cryptocurrency can already indicate that the person has this cryptocurrency, and the fact that he plays in a casino means that he can afford to lose this cryptocurrency.  So the criminal figures out that he can blackmail such a cryptocurrency owner.  And in the process of the crime, find out how much money his victim has. 
So it turns out that the very fact of playing in a casino using cryptocurrency and de-anonymizing the player using KYC is already a potential criminogenic factor and poses a danger to human safety.  And of course, law enforcement agencies must fight such manifestations of crime and extortion.
 And not just fight after a crime has been committed, but carry out preventive measures.
 And by the way, maintaining the anonymity of the player and the absence of public data about him on the Internet is a very high-quality type of counteraction and prevention of this type of crime.

Well, you are absolutely right, what happens is that as long as the players do not let the casinos know these things, the casinos do not care about the very particular and specific cases where the Persons suffer this type of crime, authorities can claim that it was for everything except for a KYC, in the same way some users have said this in their threads regarding the KYC requirement, and this has been an issue that they want to cover by saying that with KYC they obtain much more security and have more options to recover their money in case it is subject to a possible hack, then what they say is that they will be able to recover the funds, but they do not say anything about the leaked data of people, which I believe is very important to handle.

I don't know how things are handled at the level of Europe and the most developed countries, but in the country where I live, even the "authorities" lend themselves to allowing criminals to commit this type of misdeeds, and what they are given is a slice of money. What they get so that criminals continue operating, in reality this is something that has become more dangerous, it may be that in developed countries things are seen very differently, but the focus of all this is going in that direction, for At least in South America things are a little more direct, and people may be a little better prepared to face these types of problems.

[Dunamisx]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

[Wiwo]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

One of the things that most gamblers look out for on casinos is the KYC requirements which is what determine how the casino value the privacy of they player's, and although sometimes we have to note the ability of those casino's and what are the level of their liquidity and prorefecency of service,  besides just kyc, there are other things that can forces gamblers to ditch off no kyc casinos and go after kyc casinos and one of such is the amount of available liquidity and games.

For me, I prefer to just hand over my documents for verifications if I trust the site, instead of risking my funds to  play on a casino that does not have good volumes and risk not paying out if and when I hit a jackpot, all because of no kyc.

[ScamViruS]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

If a platform is trusted and has a good reputation in the market, gamblers have no problem doing KYC in that casino, because they know that doing KYC here will not face any problem and will have a good experience in the future. Doing KYC is difficult for many gamblers as they try to prioritize their privacy. As a result those gamblers refrain from joining casinos that ask KYC and try to find another alternative as they feel it is a better option for them. Gamblers really don't care much about how the government kicks in, so they just want to be able to withdraw their winnings properly and gamble safely on that platform.

[8ombard]

Is the OP still active?

[Bitinity]

Is the OP still active?

His last online was a week ago as you can see in his profile page. If you want to get your site listed in his site, you can use the "request listing" feature which can be found on the bottom of the homepage above the 18+ logo or you can simply visit https://www.notokyc.com/request. Perhaps they will contact you by email/telegram once you submit the request since you have to put your email address and telegram on the request form.

[delfastTions]

It seems to me that often criminals can start blackmailing ordinary people who are not millionaires or cryptocurrency whales but who simply somehow provided their personal data (including their address where they live) as part of the KYC procedure at some crypto casino, and these  the data was stolen and made public on the network. 
After all, the very fact that a player has a cryptocurrency can already indicate that the person has this cryptocurrency, and the fact that he plays in a casino means that he can afford to lose this cryptocurrency.  So the criminal figures out that he can blackmail such a cryptocurrency owner.  And in the process of the crime, find out how much money his victim has. 
So it turns out that the very fact of playing in a casino using cryptocurrency and de-anonymizing the player using KYC is already a potential criminogenic factor and poses a danger to human safety.  And of course, law enforcement agencies must fight such manifestations of crime and extortion.
 And not just fight after a crime has been committed, but carry out preventive measures.
 And by the way, maintaining the anonymity of the player and the absence of public data about him on the Internet is a very high-quality type of counteraction and prevention of this type of crime.

Well, you are absolutely right, what happens is that as long as the players do not let the casinos know these things, the casinos do not care about the very particular and specific cases where the Persons suffer this type of crime, authorities can claim that it was for everything except for a KYC, in the same way some users have said this in their threads regarding the KYC requirement, and this has been an issue that they want to cover by saying that with KYC they obtain much more security and have more options to recover their money in case it is subject to a possible hack, then what they say is that they will be able to recover the funds, but they do not say anything about the leaked data of people, which I believe is very important to handle.

I don't know how things are handled at the level of Europe and the most developed countries, but in the country where I live, even the "authorities" lend themselves to allowing criminals to commit this type of misdeeds, and what they are given is a slice of money. What they get so that criminals continue operating, in reality this is something that has become more dangerous, it may be that in developed countries things are seen very differently, but the focus of all this is going in that direction, for At least in South America things are a little more direct, and people may be a little better prepared to face these types of problems.

The problem is that there is a huge difference in the fight against crime in developed countries and in all other countries of the world that are considered underdeveloped.  But at the same time, everyone forgets that more than 7 billion people live in these countries.  There are only a billion people in developed countries.  Particularly in undeveloped countries, crimes such as blackmail and extortion, and often outright robbery, are very likely when criminals find out the victim’s address and find out that he has money, such as cryptocurrency.  And the fact that such a person undergoes KYC at the casino, and then this data is stolen by hackers or corrupt employees.  And the result is simply direct attacks by bandits on ordinary people.  And accordingly, the number of such crimes is growing. 
Here are the obvious and completely ugly and harmful consequences of this damn KYC procedure. 
But for some reason, no one among legislators is in a hurry to remember this and does not like to talk about it.  And it's time to do this.  At least even on our forum.

[EarnOnVictor]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

Your concern is true and the no-KYC casinos have been the no-go area for me since the day I started gambling and I don't think I can be so tempted to register there judging by the bad reviews I read which are mostly against them. I was tempted a while ago, especially when my supporting documents for verification had expired, but in all, it was never worth it in my view so I have always avoided it. Apart from the money someone could lose due to fraud since no one can question them, it is also bad in the sense that they are not regulated, they could be laundering money, and by patronising them, it technically means that you are supporting such a bad operation.

Needless to say, they can just disappear into the thin air as some of them have done, having gotten enough money from their customers. These guys are only operating because of the under-regulation of internet activities. For this, they can do as they like without anyone questioning them or sanctioning them. So why entrust my money to the care of such a company?

But for the ill-gotten money of some people and the so-called privacy concern of others, they would opt for it. I can't as nothing is as private as people make it seem and I have nothing to hide.

[Out of mind]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

[freedomgo]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw.

It depends on the casino, but in most casinos I've used, I was never force to submit a KYC before I was able to withdraw my money.
I think it also matter on how much you have gambled, because as for me, I'm just a typical gambler betting size is not big since gambling is just for me to enjoy.

When they are regulated, they can require their users for KYC, it could be now or later, anytime, so we should be ready with that.

When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

That's up to the casino as they are regulated and they follow some mandates from their regulaor. If at the beginning when we read the TOS that "KYC" thing is present, we should not neglict it and assume they are not requiring a KYC since they didn't require us when we started. At least be ready anytime, beacuse if you are clean, there's nothing to hide, just follow the rules and enjoy the winning.

[BitcoinVN_official]

Good afternoon from Ho Chi Minh City/Vietnam! 

Our service (launched in 2014) would be interested to list with your page; however it seems currently the contact form is broken.

(see below screenshot)

Besides offering an on- & offramp from/to Vietnamese Dong (VND) we also allow our users to swap different cryptocurrencies; generally without the need for an account creation.

Only VND deposits currently face tight restrictions due to the risk of "dirty funds" in the Vietnam banking system. 

---

[danadc]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

Those things are what I have experienced most in the casinos because they are recent, they are not old, I only trust like 3 or 4 casinos and I have complied with the KYC because it is the easiest way to do anything to be able to generate the best trust in my deposit , it is Always important that our money goes to the best casino so as not to have problems when withdrawing, for me the worst thing is that they don't tell me anything about KYC and I have to do it last when I need to withdraw my money, that's for my is the worst thing they can do

In the casinos they must say that the KYC Verification must be completed so that they can withdraw, that is the first thing to say in a casino instead of telling them to deposit and deposit, because that is what is really needed, withdrawing is the main thing for all Players.

[Pascal Parvex]

Hi. My simple gambling website is based on the Waves blockchain and is decentralized. No account is needed, you only need a Waves wallet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5201877.0

[OvertimeMarkets]

Looking for crypto platforms without the KYC hassle? Check out NoToKYC.com.

Your gateway to no-KYC crypto casinos and exchanges. Simple, private, and efficient.
Whether you're a gambler or a trader, if you're looking for No KYC platforms, we've got you covered!

Our AI's Ranking Criteria:
- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.
- Cryptos: Platforms supporting decentralized cryptos like Bitcoin (BTC) and Monero (XMR) rank higher.
- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.
- Withdrawal Time: Instant withdrawals? Our AI approves!
- Accepted Cryptos: Diversity in crypto options fetches a higher rank.
 

How to get EXCLUSIVE BONUSES?

1. Visit No KYC Casinos
2. Click on the shaking gift box in the menu.
3. Follow the simple steps to earn spins.
4. Use your spins to unlock exclusive bonuses.

Best Crypto Casinos No Kyc Crypto Casinos Anonymous Crypto Casinos no deposit bonuses

Hi there, we just recently joined bitcointalk, but basically i think https://www.overtimemarkets.xyz/ fits the description you guys are looking to list on your website perfectly.
You just need an Ethereum wallet to interact with the platform, limiting or banning successful users is not possible, and no KYC of course. Another important point is that the platform is non-custodial, meaning that you dont need to deposit or withdraw funds, you interact directly with the smart contracts and nobody can stop you from claiming your winnings.

[delfastTions]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

But I continue to believe, and the experience of other players clearly confirms that sudden KYC in the event of withdrawal of money that you won in any casino is now an almost inevitable process and the inevitable course of development of the gaming industry. 
And now, increasingly, the exploitation of the marketing slogan “No KYC” is turning into a farce and a false promise.  I think that legislators are everywhere attacking cryptocurrency and such a characteristic feature of cryptocurrency as the anonymity of payments.  And many casinos in their jurisdictions simply cannot afford to operate normally and legally if they do not introduce this KYC procedure.
 This is all sad simply because millions of gamblers would prefer to remain completely anonymous, and the realities of the gambling industry provide fewer and fewer opportunities for this. 
So now everyone should probably be skeptical and distrustful when someone supposedly guarantees “No KYC”.

[EarnOnVictor]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

But I continue to believe, and the experience of other players clearly confirms that sudden KYC in the event of withdrawal of money that you won in any casino is now an almost inevitable process and the inevitable course of development of the gaming industry. 
And now, increasingly, the exploitation of the marketing slogan “No KYC” is turning into a farce and a false promise.  I think that legislators are everywhere attacking cryptocurrency and such a characteristic feature of cryptocurrency as the anonymity of payments.  And many casinos in their jurisdictions simply cannot afford to operate normally and legally if they do not introduce this KYC procedure.
 This is all sad simply because millions of gamblers would prefer to remain completely anonymous, and the realities of the gambling industry provide fewer and fewer opportunities for this. 
So now everyone should probably be skeptical and distrustful when someone supposedly guarantees “No KYC”.

It is high time those guys perish the idea of anonymity, there shouldn't be a thing like that as long as you are a human being and are dealing with financial transactions. If anyone wants to be anonymous, the forest is there, go there, after all, you will not be a threat to the civilised society since you are living in the bush. But if you must live in civilized environment, then you must be accounted for, there must be the link between you and what you do. In all good sense, if you are not the kind that is illegal in activities, you have nothing to worry about, even as no one is revealing your details like many feared. Who even cares about that in most cases?

We all must know and acknowledge that regulation is a must unless there is no crime in the world where everyone is trusted to be sane and do the right thing. Is that what we experience in our societies? Certainly not. The more you allow anonymity, the more the evil doers use the opportunity to perpetrate their evil, and I do not think that is the society we all want to build.

However, many casinos are only hiding under the regulation to cheat their customers, some of the acclaimed no-KYC casinos would later ask for it when the customer is such that is good at his games and also withdraws frequently or wanting to withdraw a huge amount of money. That's just cheating and not about being answerable to any regulation. But if a KYC casino asks you for the KYC, it is their right since they are not a no-KYC casino, it may only take time, they will ask. Only that the odd times they ask at times could make it suspicious, nevertheless, they are still within their right.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

[avp2306]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

I understand why people got afraid on submitting their KYC details since there's so many negative possibilities could happen to them if there's a sudden leakage of private data's on the platform you are using and you might encounter a problem like stolen identity issues or other related to frauds or scamming activity that's why to many people are still been skeptical to submit their information even if they know the platform they are using is reputable.

But we understand that this is common requirements now on casino or even on every crypto platforms we are using so the least thing we can do is to choose those most reputable among them all so we can minimize the risk to get a potential issue in future.

[panjul07]

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

Because some gamblers cares about their privacy and this is the reason why they do not want to deal with KYC especially for gambling purpose.
Not about afraid or not IMO but more about privacy preferences and I believe it may change later.
We all know that there was no KYC at all in this crypto world, not online gambling but also when it comes to exchange service.
Regulation changed later when most online services where money is involved need to deal with KYC, that's why people's preferences are also changed due to their needs.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

Although there are some casinos that has KYC rules based on wagering/deposit/withdrawal limit but in fact casino can ask it anytime even if you have not reach the limit so dont rely on such limit but always be ready to be asked for KYC anytime.

[delfastTions]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

But I continue to believe, and the experience of other players clearly confirms that sudden KYC in the event of withdrawal of money that you won in any casino is now an almost inevitable process and the inevitable course of development of the gaming industry. 
And now, increasingly, the exploitation of the marketing slogan “No KYC” is turning into a farce and a false promise.  I think that legislators are everywhere attacking cryptocurrency and such a characteristic feature of cryptocurrency as the anonymity of payments.  And many casinos in their jurisdictions simply cannot afford to operate normally and legally if they do not introduce this KYC procedure.
 This is all sad simply because millions of gamblers would prefer to remain completely anonymous, and the realities of the gambling industry provide fewer and fewer opportunities for this. 
So now everyone should probably be skeptical and distrustful when someone supposedly guarantees “No KYC”.

It is high time those guys perish the idea of anonymity, there shouldn't be a thing like that as long as you are a human being and are dealing with financial transactions. If anyone wants to be anonymous, the forest is there, go there, after all, you will not be a threat to the civilised society since you are living in the bush. But if you must live in civilized environment, then you must be accounted for, there must be the link between you and what you do. In all good sense, if you are not the kind that is illegal in activities, you have nothing to worry about, even as no one is revealing your details like many feared. Who even cares about that in most cases?

We all must know and acknowledge that regulation is a must unless there is no crime in the world where everyone is trusted to be sane and do the right thing. Is that what we experience in our societies? Certainly not. The more you allow anonymity, the more the evil doers use the opportunity to perpetrate their evil, and I do not think that is the society we all want to build.

However, many casinos are only hiding under the regulation to cheat their customers, some of the acclaimed no-KYC casinos would later ask for it when the customer is such that is good at his games and also withdraws frequently or wanting to withdraw a huge amount of money. That's just cheating and not about being answerable to any regulation. But if a KYC casino asks you for the KYC, it is their right since they are not a no-KYC casino, it may only take time, they will ask. Only that the odd times they ask at times could make it suspicious, nevertheless, they are still within their right.

Of course, you can retire to the forest and become a completely anonymous hermit and hunt for food, fish and collect fruits in order to survive.  But there are few who want such a life. 

As for life in society, it should be recognized that in the life of any person there are secrets that he definitely would not want to become public.  For example, you have a secret woman lover whom you are dating.  So, should you not hide this and tell your wife honestly?  Well, it’s clear what will follow!  Or, secretly from your employer, you are into gambling.  So what, will it do you any good if your employer finds out about this?  These examples clearly demonstrate the importance of maintaining anonymity in certain matters.  It is obvious.  Is total control over a person’s life an ideal society of the future?  Should civilization develop along this path?  By the way, KYC in crypto is just a small step in the development of total control. 
And in my opinion, the topic of crime and illegal payments in crypt is a drop in the ocean of financial crimes, where everyone operates in cash or even ordinary bank transfers.  This accusation of the entire cryptocurrency in its criminal nature is a fake that is intensively spreading into the mass consciousness by the banking financial clan and interested bosses and law enforcement agencies.  By the way, they also stand in the faithful service of these same banking clans and also receive their rather large sum.

[NoToKYC]

We are working on a new big update soon.

[LUCKMCFLY]

But we understand that this is common requirements now on casino or even on every crypto platforms we are using so the least thing we can do is to choose those most reputable among them all so we can minimize the risk to get a potential issue in future.

There are many things that can be done, in fact one of the things that can result is that the erpns that go to play in a casino, sometimes a casino can be very honest in every way, but if they do not have the licenses, then they have They have to do it, they classify them as an unreliable casino, but come on, there are Casinos that meet all the requirements to obtain licenses , and a while later it becomes a scam and that is something that does not add up. , and I realize that it can't stop there, but I think that many need to open their eyes and see what they are getting into, I don't know if in the future there will be a casino with Monero without licenses and that they are honest, but based on everything What has been said and only the most shameless thing that can exist is Weight and it is a great option, although it goes against many rules.

[EarnOnVictor]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

I understand why people got afraid on submitting their KYC details since there's so many negative possibilities could happen to them if there's a sudden leakage of private data's on the platform you are using and you might encounter a problem like stolen identity issues or other related to frauds or scamming activity that's why to many people are still been skeptical to submit their information even if they know the platform they are using is reputable.

But we understand that this is common requirements now on casino or even on every crypto platforms we are using so the least thing we can do is to choose those most reputable among them all so we can minimize the risk to get a potential issue in future.

Bro, truly, this is a consideration, but people are taking it too far. Think of it, since you've been growing up till today, how many places have you dropped your personal details and contact details? Have they harmed you till today? This is peculiar to those who overemphasise the danger in completing the KYC, it is not so bad and dangerous. Most of these guys are not even worth $2500, is that what they are coming to your house to rob you for? And if it is online, is the person childish to the point of clicking the unfamiliar links, sending OTP/2FA code to strangers or even entertaining a conversation with a stranger, especially when money is related? If the person did that, then it is his fault and not the fault of the KYC.

I'm just saying that in the worst-case scenario, we should not believe that KYC is a cause of imminent danger or privacy infringement. The data leak we are even talking about is in degree, and if they do not know you to warrant a direct threat, the major thing they need is your email and phone number, they do not have any business at your house. And if you are careful enough on your path, all their online efforts will still be to nothing. Some people will not stop making me laugh here, imagine, someone who has only $2500 as the maximum amount in an international casino that is many miles away from his country still afraid of data leaks and personal threats. Will they (perpetrators) fly from their country down to you just because of your peanut? People often take this too far despite completing KYC with banks and many other formal and informal establishments (brokerages, hotels, hospitals etc.).

[freedomgo]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Looking forward to it.

Anyway, I don't know if it has been asked already or I didn't read this in the OP before.. this one.
from OP

- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.

What do you mean but low KYC? Because if you promote no KYC, it should be completely no KYC at all.

Also you posted about your license.

- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.

Does this license providers allow you to operate with requiring KYC to gamblers?

[Hispo]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Looking forward to it.

Anyway, I don't know if it has been asked already or I didn't read this in the OP before.. this one.
from OP

- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.

What do you mean but low KYC? Because if you promote no KYC, it should be completely no KYC at all.

Also you posted about your license.

- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.

Does this license providers allow you to operate with requiring KYC to gamblers?

This may be the first occasion I have read or even listened about such a thing like "low KYC"... But if I had to guess on what it means, then I would say it is about providing some personal information to the casino or service provider which is not as extensive as the "full KYC" which I typically asked when we wish to withdraw money from a casino.
Perhaps, instead asking for pictures of ourselves and our passports, they would ask for an email and Identity card (which is not as valuable as a passport in terms in identity verification).

Also, as far as I recall the casino licensed issued by the authorities in Curaçao are not suitable for casinos which do not want to impose their KYC practices on their gamblers. So my guess is OP meant simply to keep a separate section in his webpage to be dedicated for the ratings of casino licenses themselves, not casinos which operate under them.

It is all kind of a speculation from my part, though. 

[khaled0111]

... Most of these guys are not even worth $2500, is that what they are coming to your house to rob you for?...
People often take this too far despite completing KYC with banks and many other formal and informal establishments (brokerages, hotels, hospitals etc.).

If your personal information/documents fall into the wrong hands then you have no idea what they can do with it. It's not only about knowing where you leave and the risk of getting robbed. Your personal documents can be used in illigal activities such as scamming other people. They can use it to create accounts in your name on some exchanges for example and use it for money laundering...
Submitting your personal documents to your bank agency is not the same as submitting them to an online casino.

[freedomgo]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Looking forward to it.

Anyway, I don't know if it has been asked already or I didn't read this in the OP before.. this one.
from OP

- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.

What do you mean but low KYC? Because if you promote no KYC, it should be completely no KYC at all.

Also you posted about your license.

- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.

Does this license providers allow you to operate with requiring KYC to gamblers?

This may be the first occasion I have read or even listened about such a thing like "low KYC"... But if I had to guess on what it means, then I would say it is about providing some personal information to the casino or service provider which is not as extensive as the "full KYC" which I typically asked when we wish to withdraw money from a casino.
Perhaps, instead asking for pictures of ourselves and our passports, they would ask for an email and Identity card (which is not as valuable as a passport in terms in identity verification).

Also, as far as I recall the casino licensed issued by the authorities in Curaçao are not suitable for casinos which do not want to impose their KYC practices on their gamblers. So my guess is OP meant simply to keep a separate section in his webpage to be dedicated for the ratings of casino licenses themselves, not casinos which operate under them.

It is all kind of a speculation from my part, though. 

That's why I got confused because usually when there's a KYC policy, the rules should be specific. When requiring more KYC during investigation, I think that's a different thing as it could be categorized to a special cases. You know, investigation like that does not happen most of the time, so we should only stick with the standard procedure when marketing the casino and talking about KYC process.

[avp2306]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Looking forward to it.

Anyway, I don't know if it has been asked already or I didn't read this in the OP before.. this one.
from OP

- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.

What do you mean but low KYC? Because if you promote no KYC, it should be completely no KYC at all.

Also you posted about your license.

- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.

Does this license providers allow you to operate with requiring KYC to gamblers?

This may be the first occasion I have read or even listened about such a thing like "low KYC"... But if I had to guess on what it means, then I would say it is about providing some personal information to the casino or service provider which is not as extensive as the "full KYC" which I typically asked when we wish to withdraw money from a casino.
Perhaps, instead asking for pictures of ourselves and our passports, they would ask for an email and Identity card (which is not as valuable as a passport in terms in identity verification).

Also, as far as I recall the casino licensed issued by the authorities in Curaçao are not suitable for casinos which do not want to impose their KYC practices on their gamblers. So my guess is OP meant simply to keep a separate section in his webpage to be dedicated for the ratings of casino licenses themselves, not casinos which operate under them.

It is all kind of a speculation from my part, though. 

That's why I got confused because usually when there's a KYC policy, the rules should be specific. When requiring more KYC during investigation, I think that's a different thing as it could be categorized to a special cases. You know, investigation like that does not happen most of the time, so we should only stick with the standard procedure when marketing the casino and talking about KYC process.

They should be more specific since if they say that they are non KYC compliant casino but later on they ask this because they say that their is an investigation going on their account then this leave some thoughts that they are just fooling the people who trust that they would never ask this. And for stating this they should never ask this requirement so that no people will start to doubt at them since for sure that there's a lot of people will just think about that maybe in future they would use that KYC for them to delay the withdrawals of some users or totally block it since they can't provide what they asked. They should really stick on what they are promoting since its really shady if there's sudden changes that might happen to them.

[Kavelj22]

or not.
Bro, truly, this is a consideration, but people are taking it too far. Think of it, since you've been growing up till today, how many places have you dropped your personal details and contact details? Have they harmed you till today? This is peculiar to those who overemphasise the danger in completing the KYC, it is not so bad and dangerous. Most of these guys are not even worth $2500, is that what they are coming to your house to rob you for? And if it is online, is the person childish to the point of clicking the unfamiliar links, sending OTP/2FA code to strangers or even entertaining a conversation with a stranger, especially when money is related? If the person did that, then it is his fault and not the fault of the KYC.

I'm just saying that in the worst-case scenario, we should not believe that KYC is a cause of imminent danger or privacy infringement. The data leak we are even talking about is in degree, and if they do not know you to warrant a direct threat, the major thing they need is your email and phone number, they do not have any business at your house. And if you are careful enough on your path, all their online efforts will still be to nothing. Some people will not stop making me laugh here, imagine, someone who has only $2500 as the maximum amount in an international casino that is many miles away from his country still afraid of data leaks and personal threats. Will they (perpetrators) fly from their country down to you just because of your peanut? People often take this too far despite completing KYC with banks and many other formal and informal establishments (brokerages, hotels, hospitals etc.).

Believe it or not, this is the first time I have read here on the forum from a long-standing member about this lenient treatment of private data and the extent of its impact on the concept of “privacy” in general.
We must always differentiate between the private information that we share with banks and well-known service institutions (banks, insurance companies...), and sharing that same data with companies on the Internet, especially those that do not have a clear headquarters, that is, they operate without according to proven legal licenses.
In the first case, your data is kept confidential in accordance with laws that the institution adheres to and declares this as part of the procedures for obtaining a license from the country granting approval for the activity. Any defect in the use of this data could expose the organization to unfair punitive measures that may lead to the payment of compensation in huge amounts or even the cessation of activity completely.
In the second case, the risk increases because the online company can use that data in different ways that are not compatible with the principle of “preserving personal data,” especially since users may never realize that. In addition, the servers of these sites are constantly vulnerable to hacking, and there are no sufficient guarantees about the absolute safety of their systems. There are many cases of hacking or scam projects, and with a simple search it is possible to review many examples of disasters that users have been exposed to as a result of their data being stolen or even sold on the black market.

[Dunamisx]

No KYC should be something we all may have to regard as well as going for, we need our privacy in whatever thing we are doing, we also have to consider the numbers of platforms that can afford to provide us with this, which we want starting right from the gambling platforms, so many gamblers have already been having difficult times from providing informations regarding their KYC informations.

[Ojima-ojo]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Waiting to see the update when it drops, because most of us that have being following up with the discussions on this thread have being seeking for a clarification of a provable and standstill statement on the KYC demands from your team, wether your site is a 100% no KYC or just some partial KYC.


Because some casinos may promise a no KYC at the start but along the line when the gambler win a substantial amount, their come up with such demands for verification before they can withdraw.

[freedomgo]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Looking forward to it.

Anyway, I don't know if it has been asked already or I didn't read this in the OP before.. this one.
from OP

- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.

What do you mean but low KYC? Because if you promote no KYC, it should be completely no KYC at all.

Also you posted about your license.

- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.

Does this license providers allow you to operate with requiring KYC to gamblers?

This may be the first occasion I have read or even listened about such a thing like "low KYC"... But if I had to guess on what it means, then I would say it is about providing some personal information to the casino or service provider which is not as extensive as the "full KYC" which I typically asked when we wish to withdraw money from a casino.
Perhaps, instead asking for pictures of ourselves and our passports, they would ask for an email and Identity card (which is not as valuable as a passport in terms in identity verification).

Also, as far as I recall the casino licensed issued by the authorities in Curaçao are not suitable for casinos which do not want to impose their KYC practices on their gamblers. So my guess is OP meant simply to keep a separate section in his webpage to be dedicated for the ratings of casino licenses themselves, not casinos which operate under them.

It is all kind of a speculation from my part, though.  

That's why I got confused because usually when there's a KYC policy, the rules should be specific. When requiring more KYC during investigation, I think that's a different thing as it could be categorized to a special cases. You know, investigation like that does not happen most of the time, so we should only stick with the standard procedure when marketing the casino and talking about KYC process.

They should be more specific since if they say that they are non KYC compliant casino but later on they ask this because they say that their is an investigation going on their account then this leave some thoughts that they are just fooling the people who trust that they would never ask this. And for stating this they should never ask this requirement so that no people will start to doubt at them since for sure that there's a lot of people will just think about that maybe in future they would use that KYC for them to delay the withdrawals of some users or totally block it since they can't provide what they asked.

That's how it should work, no KYC, it's from the start until the end. If a gambler cheat the casino, do you think a gambler will comply with them in submitting a KYC documents? Of course no because that will only put him in danger and will get arrested since the casino itself they claimed to be regulated.  The thing is, when a casino market to people that they are "NO KYC" and people signed up because they think they'll gain privacy when gambling but later they are required a KYC, they might not like it and as a result, casinos reputation will be at risk.

They should really stick on what they are promoting since its really shady if there's sudden changes that might happen to them.

THIS IS TRUE.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Waiting to see the update when it drops, because most of us that have being following up with the discussions on this thread have being seeking for a clarification of a provable and standstill statement on the KYC demands from your team, wether your site is a 100% no KYC or just some partial KYC.


Because some casinos may promise a no KYC at the start but along the line when the gambler win a substantial amount, their come up with such demands for verification before they can withdraw.

One thing we must understand is that, with the current settiings in terms of regulations and so on, there is no registered online gambling casino that will be kyc free, any casino that is kyc free is possibly not yet registered and don't have a license, or the license they claim to have may likely be a fake one, every genuine online gambling casino that is genuinely registered and given an original operating license sure must demand kyc from their customers, as this is something that they are mandated to do, failure sometimes lead to the government or regulators sanctioning such casino for the offense.

But on the other, I believe there is nothing wrong if we have a community casino where the owners are well trusted to not abscond with customers funds, even without them registering the casino, which should possibly be the gateway for them to need to require kyc verification from users.
If this is the type of casino this platform is building, then I think it's good, and I also look forward to them launching it.

[Wiwo]

For a casinos to survive in the current market trends and demand, their must have to acquire license and that comes with a mandate to keep up to date with regulatory requirements such as kyc and the rest of the other demands that comes along with the licence.

And any casino that doesn't have such licence stand the risk of getting shutdown by government at the end of the day due to violation of law.

[Hispo]

No KYC should be something we all may have to regard as well as going for, we need our privacy in whatever thing we are doing, we also have to consider the numbers of platforms that can afford to provide us with this, which we want starting right from the gambling platforms, so many gamblers have already been having difficult times from providing informations regarding their KYC informations.

Sure, I understand your point of the integrity of our personal information, also the fact that information could be stolen by hackers and misused for whatever reason some malicious entity had.
Though, you also need to put on the scale how KYC information is a vital part of the Anti money laundering efforts the governments push forward, so most of the criminal organizations cannot grow at a very fast pace by having their drake assets laundered and recirculated within the banking system. If you found and way for people to keep their privacy and at the same time stopping criminals from using casinos to wash their capitals, then I am sure there would be many people interested to talk with you about it and seek for that system implementation on their casinos and betting houses (such a system would give much commercial advantage, since nobody likes to submit information in order to withdraw money from winnings).
Sadly, as the world stands today and since criminals won't stop trying improve their liquidity, KYC has become a necessary evil in this digital era, when money and the internet seem to have fused together.

[EarnOnVictor]

For a casinos to survive in the current market trends and demand, their must have to acquire license and that comes with a mandate to keep up to date with regulatory requirements such as kyc and the rest of the other demands that comes along with the licence.

And any casino that doesn't have such licence stand the risk of getting shutdown by government at the end of the day due to violation of law.

You are right, especially if they are operating from a sane country that takes everything seriously, including their security and taxation. No casino will thrive in such a country for so long without being made to account for its deeds. This is why many casinos are running in offshore countries, the countries that are less strict and serious, and even if they are regulated with them, the regulation will be weak. Most importantly, this may allow them to have their casino business established for a while before they eventually do the needful with the government. By then, they might have been well-established enough to be able to fulfil all the government's demands, and after all, they've already bought themselves time to do some somewhat illegal things out of the radar of the government.

This is when you see the casinos that might have started without a KYC suddenly asking for KYC from all of their clients at once and might be strict with it, especially during the process of withdrawing their money. This means that they may want to hide in some circumstances, but not forever, and when the government has started with them, it is only two options. It is either to shut down or cooperate with the laws of the land. That's when you see them start doing the needful.

[avp2306]

They should be more specific since if they say that they are non KYC compliant casino but later on they ask this because they say that their is an investigation going on their account then this leave some thoughts that they are just fooling the people who trust that they would never ask this. And for stating this they should never ask this requirement so that no people will start to doubt at them since for sure that there's a lot of people will just think about that maybe in future they would use that KYC for them to delay the withdrawals of some users or totally block it since they can't provide what they asked.

That's how it should work, no KYC, it's from the start until the end. If a gambler cheat the casino, do you think a gambler will comply with them in submitting a KYC documents? Of course no because that will only put him in danger and will get arrested since the casino itself they claimed to be regulated.  The thing is, when a casino market to people that they are "NO KYC" and people signed up because they think they'll gain privacy when gambling but later they are required a KYC, they might not like it and as a result, casinos reputation will be at risk.

They should really stick on what they are promoting since its really shady if there's sudden changes that might happen to them.

THIS IS TRUE.

They market to be as no KYC casino so they should follow it and if they talk about legal compliance then I guess they should not claim anything KYC free at first place if there would be a possible implementation that's why they should not try to fool people since this could able to ruin their reputation built.

Not unless if they don't have any plan to became a reputable casino and their main goal is to scam those people who avoid to gamble on KYC compliant sites. People should read the TOS since its important to know them and if they insist not to do it then they continue to gamble then its their mistake if there's something happened to them and no people would provably give there sympathy especially if they know that person is so lazy.

[Russlenat]

They market to be as no KYC casino so they should follow it and if they talk about legal compliance then I guess they should not claim anything KYC free at first place .<>

This is quite contradicting, I hope OP will clarify this because no KYC is not the norm for a casino that has a license because they are regulated. AFAIK, when a casino is regulated, KYC is automatic, so they cannot fool the public saying they are a no KYC casino, unless they are unlicense and a fully decentralized platform.

[EarnOnVictor]

... Most of these guys are not even worth $2500, is that what they are coming to your house to rob you for?...
People often take this too far despite completing KYC with banks and many other formal and informal establishments (brokerages, hotels, hospitals etc.).

If your personal information/documents fall into the wrong hands then you have no idea what they can do with it. It's not only about knowing where you leave and the risk of getting robbed. Your personal documents can be used in illigal activities such as scamming other people. They can use it to create accounts in your name on some exchanges for example and use it for money laundering...
Submitting your personal documents to your bank agency is not the same as submitting them to an online casino.

You have a point there and I must say that I am already aware of what you said as well. This is why one must ensure that they are not just gambling anyhow, they should gamble with those casinos that are big and serious enough and that can take security as a priority. Also, banks are not so different in the matter of data leaks, this is because it is human beings who are behind its operation as well and not some angels. If you know what many bank employees are doing all in the name of money, you will be amazed, so we should not exonerate them in this. Reputation, security and integrity matter here. Moreso, this is the reason why we should not just see a new casino and register there without thinking it through, why won't they leak your data?

Data leaks are not even peculiar to casinos or any formal or informal settings, banks and financial institutions' data could leak, hackers could infest them and we've seen a lot of government and private establishments where client/customer data got leaked. I've also done KYC with some formal financial establishments where afterwards I would be receiving strange calls and emails, so data leaks every time. But I am not saying this because I believe it is good but just not to exonerate the bank from it. As for the usage of one's data elsewhere, it is also not uncommon, but they do not necessarily need to lay hands on one's document before using one's profile and data all the same, they can doctor it, so risk is everywhere in this digital age.

Regardless, KYC completion is a standard and international procedure, and of course, it has its pros and cons, but no matter how we try to defend or reject it, we must obey in most climes.

[8ombard]

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

[rodskee]

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

I think sending direct PM will be enough since OP is constantly online and updating this
thread at least once a week ,
looks like your site is interested in dealing with them ? that's  a good sign of having larger marketing and good luck
about that and to your site as well guys.

[EarnOnVictor]

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

Did you mean NoToKYC itself? Well, it shouldn't be difficult to get in touch with him unless you've not given it time for a try. Although I've not tried any of these means before, you may try them. First, you may want to send him a private link through his Bitcointalk, I am sure he could be checking it once in a while. On checking now, his last activity here reads 25th of April which was just last week, so he is indeed checking.

Alternatively, on his website, there are columns for Blogs (at the upper side) and social media contacts like Telegram, Twitter, Discord and the rest on the bottom side. Those are the best means to contact anyone quicker if the person is still active.

[Taskford]

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

Provably there's no one in this forum have direct connection on the owners aside from those people who's working on their site. So maybe at least contact them here on their account used in this forum or try to contact them in site since for that maybe you can get an answer from them related to what are those interesting things you want to discuss with them.

I wonder what's the reason why suddenly you contact them since if you want partnership or whatsoever there are successful casino which is good to deal and offer something that they can't resist. I don't mean that this site is bad but they still need to prove something so people could able safe or have confidence to try this. Anyways good luck and maybe best to wait for them to go active since somehow provably they are watching this thread and want to get some insights of latest discussions made by people.

[danadc]

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

Provably there's no one in this forum have direct connection on the owners aside from those people who's working on their site. So maybe at least contact them here on their account used in this forum or try to contact them in site since for that maybe you can get an answer from them related to what are those interesting things you want to discuss with them.

I wonder what's the reason why suddenly you contact them since if you want partnership or whatsoever there are successful casino which is good to deal and offer something that they can't resist. I don't mean that this site is bad but they still need to prove something so people could able safe or have confidence to try this. Anyways good luck and maybe best to wait for them to go active since somehow provably they are watching this thread and want to get some insights of latest discussions made by people.

I see the purpose of this thread as more focused on information, in regards to everything that is a casino that does not ask for KYC, KYC for me is something that Follows me Everywhere , in all crypto and non-crypto platforms they ask for KYC  and that's something I don't like, we can Avoid all KYC in casinos, but if we do KYC in Other platforms that are not crypto, I don't know what we are looking for, I know that there must be a means of identification for everything and everyone , but it is time for us to see this as an option so that we can have a strategy on how to find the casino sites to play without KYC features , and that is reliable, how do we find? It is difficult to do something like this because the things that are done in this world have nothing to do with KYC, I actually don't know if there is a casino here without KYC or if the Thread is about a casino like that or if they want to set up a casino like that.

[Dunamisx]

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

I will advised from this regard that you send OP a pm as someone already advised, secondly, try visit their main site and see for yourself what they offers or contains and read through their policies, you may find it interesting to have a deal directly with them, i think OP as well should be their representative here on bitcointalk, engage him as well in other to have a smooth experience with them.

[zarintasnim]

No KYC casino is good but most of the time no KYC does not solve all the problems. KYC establishes trust between platforms and users, reassuring each party of the other's legitimacy. Know Your Customer (KYC) process is critical for crypto casinos and exchanges to implement. By verifying the identities of users, KYC helps prevent fraud and other financial crimes that could undermine the integrity of the crypto ecosystem. Thorough KYC involves collecting identifying information such as legal names, physical addresses, and government ID numbers. By taking the lead on rigorous KYC procedures, forward-thinking casinos and exchanges can show crypto's viability as a secure financial system.

[wallet4bitcoin]

The NO KYC thing has been frowned at by some regulatory agencies, they are making it uneasy for people to have to setup any form of Casino with the idea of NO KYC.

That list is going to be incorrect in no distant time cos the most of those casinos will be KYC compliant  in no distant time.

The way people turn up with Casinos today and hope that NO KYC is the best strategy to marketing should be frowned at as well.

[Hispo]

We are working on a new big update soon.

Looking forward to it.

Anyway, I don't know if it has been asked already or I didn't read this in the OP before.. this one.
from OP

- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.

What do you mean but low KYC? Because if you promote no KYC, it should be completely no KYC at all.

Also you posted about your license.

- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.

Does this license providers allow you to operate with requiring KYC to gamblers?

✂️

That's why I got confused because usually when there's a KYC policy, the rules should be specific. When requiring more KYC during investigation, I think that's a different thing as it could be categorized to a special cases. You know, investigation like that does not happen most of the time, so we should only stick with the standard procedure when marketing the casino and talking about KYC process.

Though, I think in this context it does not necessarily means an investigation being carried out by the casino in order for them to be able to continue to offer their services to us or for them to be able to allow us to withdraw some earnings we had. I believe there is an actual separation of levels within the KYC process.
It is something I learnt not long ago when I decided to join to the webpage of some payment processor, they would limit one's monthly volume based on the personal documents we sent during the process of signing up to their wallet.

If one decided to take pictures of one's Identity card, then they would only allow a monthly volume of 400$, on the other hand, submitting one's passport (which is supposed to be up-to-date), then the monthly limit will get increased to 1500$.

Since casinos and payment processors kind of go with the same regulations, then I believe that is what it is meant in this context when we talk about several levels of KYC.

[Hamphser]

The NO KYC thing has been frowned at by some regulatory agencies, they are making it uneasy for people to have to setup any form of Casino with the idea of NO KYC.

That list is going to be incorrect in no distant time cos the most of those casinos will be KYC compliant  in no distant time.

The way people turn up with Casinos today and hope that NO KYC is the best strategy to marketing should be frowned at as well.

If we do tend to look up on their terms and conditions of each one of them with those non KYC casinos as of this moment but there would really be that a part or those words stated that they would really be asking some KYC at their own discretion or preference depending on the condition that you do have into on which means that there's no way that you would really be able on getting out in speaking about anonymity since they could really be able to ask it out anytime they do want and this something that they would really be asking on which means that there's no way that you would really be able to get away with this. If there would really be those truly anonymous sites on which same as you said that sooner or later they would really be that KYC compliant as regulation would becomes even more stricter.

[Dunamisx]

No KYC casino is good but most of the time no KYC does not solve all the problems. KYC establishes trust between platforms and users, reassuring each party of the other's legitimacy. Know Your Customer (KYC) process is critical for crypto casinos and exchanges to implement. By verifying the identities of users, KYC helps prevent fraud and other financial crimes that could undermine the integrity of the crypto ecosystem. Thorough KYC involves collecting identifying information such as legal names, physical addresses, and government ID numbers. By taking the lead on rigorous KYC procedures, forward-thinking casinos and exchanges can show crypto's viability as a secure financial system.

I think the best solution is for one to go for a no KYC gambling platform if he thinks he is going to have issues with the casinos on the ground of the provisions for KYC, as regards this site and their offers, if you never experienced them before, then it's not right for us to conclude on what they are up to or not, what I will advise is for us to make search on what we want, if we see they have the same offers, then we go for it.

[ultrloa]

No KYC casino is good but most of the time no KYC does not solve all the problems. KYC establishes trust between platforms and users, reassuring each party of the other's legitimacy. Know Your Customer (KYC) process is critical for crypto casinos and exchanges to implement. By verifying the identities of users, KYC helps prevent fraud and other financial crimes that could undermine the integrity of the crypto ecosystem. Thorough KYC involves collecting identifying information such as legal names, physical addresses, and government ID numbers. By taking the lead on rigorous KYC procedures, forward-thinking casinos and exchanges can show crypto's viability as a secure financial system.

I think the best solution is for one to go for a no KYC gambling platform if he thinks he is going to have issues with the casinos on the ground of the provisions for KYC, as regards this site and their offers, if you never experienced them before, then it's not right for us to conclude on what they are up to or not, what I will advise is for us to make search on what we want, if we see they have the same offers, then we go for it.

I think this is only good for those gamblers who didn't spend a lot of money on their gambling habits since they could able to shift into those NO KYC casino and take the risk since maybe the amount they going to gamble is they afford to lose which is small figures only.

But I guess for whales I guess they prefer to gamble on a KYC compliant casino which reputation has been established for years since they can assure that even if they deposit a large amount of money the chances for them to get scam is less. We have those reputable casinos here and I can attest that they are really a best choice compare than taking risk and stress on those casinos saying that they will never require a KYC to their clients since we don't know how long they would last.

[Shamm]

Does anyone know how to contact the owner/admin of this site?

Leave a message to the OP then one thing for sure you will get notice as OP is active in this thread to give an update. And don't worry your reply in this thread will enough to get the attention to the OP.

I think this is only good for those gamblers who didn't spend a lot of money on their gambling habits since they could able to shift into those NO KYC casino and take the risk since maybe the amount they going to gamble is they afford to lose which is small figures only.

Those gamblers who have the budget in gambling then they are ready to risk in that then this is a good site for them if they got successful then it's good to them cause they can withdraw thier winning Money. And if they loss then still okay cause the money they use is those Money that they can afford to loss. Which means they are already prepared of the possible outcome.

[EarnOnVictor]

The NO KYC thing has been frowned at by some regulatory agencies, they are making it uneasy for people to have to setup any form of Casino with the idea of NO KYC.

That list is going to be incorrect in no distant time cos the most of those casinos will be KYC compliant  in no distant time.

The way people turn up with Casinos today and hope that NO KYC is the best strategy to marketing should be frowned at as well.

You are right about this and that's if the list in the OP is even correct anymore, some of them might have become KYC compliant as we speak, except for the hardened ones that can even steal from you if care is not taken. Some planned their casino in a very crooked way just because they do not want to be answerable to any authority, and the question is whether anyone will be willing to work with such casinos simply because they are no-KYC. I can't do that.

That said, some will continue to advertise the no-KYC mantra but indeed request KYC from their customers, but those customers are selected, or should I say targetted. They could target them due to many reasons which include their good quality of playing, how often they withdraw and their current withdrawal size. If some or all of these are peculiar to the gambler and the casino could be asking for KYC, such should know that something is fishy, and the best is to run as far as your leg could take you.

I've never been a fan of no-KYC casinos and never will I be as the risk is high for me.

[michellee]

No KYC casino is good but most of the time no KYC does not solve all the problems. KYC establishes trust between platforms and users, reassuring each party of the other's legitimacy. Know Your Customer (KYC) process is critical for crypto casinos and exchanges to implement. By verifying the identities of users, KYC helps prevent fraud and other financial crimes that could undermine the integrity of the crypto ecosystem. Thorough KYC involves collecting identifying information such as legal names, physical addresses, and government ID numbers. By taking the lead on rigorous KYC procedures, forward-thinking casinos and exchanges can show crypto's viability as a secure financial system.

I think the best solution is for one to go for a no KYC gambling platform if he thinks he is going to have issues with the casinos on the ground of the provisions for KYC, as regards this site and their offers, if you never experienced them before, then it's not right for us to conclude on what they are up to or not, what I will advise is for us to make search on what we want, if we see they have the same offers, then we go for it.

If he wants to use a gambling platform without KYC, he must be able to find the right casino. That's because many casinos without KYC are not what we want. There is no guarantee that we will not have problems later.

And the casinos that ask for KYC are also the same for every gambler. They also have to be careful in choosing the casino because otherwise, they can get into trouble and have difficulty withdrawing their money.

But they can gamble without having to do KYC because there are still casinos that allow their users not to need to verify their accounts. They can still gamble with limited funds so they don't need to do KYC. And that's why we don't need to use a lot of money to gamble because after all, gambling is just for fun and entertainment. The people who do KYC are the ones who aim to win a lot of money so they are willing to do it.

[PetitCanardBleue]

Yo guys, i have charged my anonsmm with xmr, but i've got nothing on the panel, i try to contact the owner, but i've got no answer

It's my first time with crytpo payments and i'm lost

[LUCKMCFLY]

The NO KYC thing has been frowned at by some regulatory agencies, they are making it uneasy for people to have to setup any form of Casino with the idea of NO KYC.

That list is going to be incorrect in no distant time cos the most of those casinos will be KYC compliant  in no distant time.

The way people turn up with Casinos today and hope that NO KYC is the best strategy to marketing should be frowned at as well.

You are right about this and that's if the list in the OP is even correct anymore, some of them might have become KYC compliant as we speak, except for the hardened ones that can even steal from you if care is not taken. Some planned their casino in a very crooked way just because they do not want to be answerable to any authority, and the question is whether anyone will be willing to work with such casinos simply because they are no-KYC. I can't do that.

That said, some will continue to advertise the no-KYC mantra but indeed request KYC from their customers, but those customers are selected, or should I say targetted. They could target them due to many reasons which include their good quality of playing, how often they withdraw and their current withdrawal size. If some or all of these are peculiar to the gambler and the casino could be asking for KYC, such should know that something is fishy, and the best is to run as far as your leg could take you.

I've never been a fan of no-KYC casinos and never will I be as the risk is high for me.

Well, we must not deny that there are many campaigns that are carried out in favor of KYC, and that is something that has always happened, they always promote that part well because they know that that is the best for them, but on a personal level I will never agree. leave my data on a platform, I am clear that in some casinos they try not to implement this KYC rule, but I prefer to leave them in casinos that are very reliable because I am not one to leave KYC, we already have enough leaving our KYC in the banks, in all the registrations they have for everyday things, cryptocurrencies and crypto sites should never ask for KYC, well that's my way of thinking, I respect anyone's point of view.

[NoToKYC]

We released a new update of notokyc.com. Also we are hosting a 100$ BTC GIVEAWAY right now here: https://www.notokyc.com/giveaway/