🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Dunamisx]

All this kind of lies in all manners do exist in gambling, as a matter of fact, not only on this, but there are other aspects in which they will make it open to the people that they don't accept for kyc but at the long run, you will discover yourself getting involved into it without any explanation further on that, a good example is found from some of the exchanges, so am not surprised if some of the gambling sites are doing same.

.....

And you should also know that sometimes, when the company is still new, they tend not to bother users with KYC verification, because at that time, the system is either but built yet, or they are still very much busy trying to fix the bugs and all that, for those who register at that time, they may be told that the site is kyc free, but they may as well forget to tell us that they will likely activate kyc in the near future.
And some companies, be it a casino or exchange, won't let customers know when the kyc system is activated, which is actually unprofessional.

Although this is unprofessional and even, I would say, simply mean in relation to the users of such a casino, however, as I understand it, this is a very common practice of such a business.
And this is understandable, just a promise of the absence of KYC, and the ability to play anonymously, this is a great marketing ploy to attract additional customers, who obviously increase the profits of this casino. However, the justification for the introduction of a sudden, unexpected KYC can also be presented to customers by the casino as the need to comply with the requirements of the law or regulators. Thus, the responsibility of the casino itself for not fulfilling its promise about the absence of KYC is disavowed. They shifted responsibility for this decision to local authorities and completely whitewashed themselves in the eyes of customers. This is all a win-win option for introducing KYC after the casino is supposedly "guaranteed" its absence.
So in this matter, you can't trust anyone.

Well, as to many of this gambling platforms, they may not want to believe that such behavior they are making is not perfect enough, instead, such could let gambler loose their trust in them for such trick, but from the other view, we may also see it as a marketing strategy, whereby if you already know that you are going to have an issue with your kyc, then you had better not apply for any casino of such.

[delfastTions]

All this kind of lies in all manners do exist in gambling, as a matter of fact, not only on this, but there are other aspects in which they will make it open to the people that they don't accept for kyc but at the long run, you will discover yourself getting involved into it without any explanation further on that, a good example is found from some of the exchanges, so am not surprised if some of the gambling sites are doing same.

.....

And you should also know that sometimes, when the company is still new, they tend not to bother users with KYC verification, because at that time, the system is either but built yet, or they are still very much busy trying to fix the bugs and all that, for those who register at that time, they may be told that the site is kyc free, but they may as well forget to tell us that they will likely activate kyc in the near future.
And some companies, be it a casino or exchange, won't let customers know when the kyc system is activated, which is actually unprofessional.

Although this is unprofessional and even, I would say, simply mean in relation to the users of such a casino, however, as I understand it, this is a very common practice of such a business.
And this is understandable, just a promise of the absence of KYC, and the ability to play anonymously, this is a great marketing ploy to attract additional customers, who obviously increase the profits of this casino. However, the justification for the introduction of a sudden, unexpected KYC can also be presented to customers by the casino as the need to comply with the requirements of the law or regulators. Thus, the responsibility of the casino itself for not fulfilling its promise about the absence of KYC is disavowed. They shifted responsibility for this decision to local authorities and completely whitewashed themselves in the eyes of customers. This is all a win-win option for introducing KYC after the casino is supposedly "guaranteed" its absence.
So in this matter, you can't trust anyone.

Well, as to many of this gambling platforms, they may not want to believe that such behavior they are making is not perfect enough, instead, such could let gambler loose their trust in them for such trick, but from the other view, we may also see it as a marketing strategy, whereby if you already know that you are going to have an issue with your kyc, then you had better not apply for any casino of such.

And the thing is that you can’t predict in advance what a casino will do if it promises not to introduce KYC or simply doesn’t announce or include in the ToS the requirements for mandatory user verification using the KYC procedure. After some time of the casino’s operation without KYC at all, these requirements may be unexpectedly added to the casino’s rules. And the main thing is that you won’t be able to do anything against it simply because the casino will always find an argument justifying such a decision in the form of obligations to comply with the requirements of laws and rules issued by local regulators.

[NoToKYC]

We have published a new blog post : https://www.notokyc.com/blog/post.php?id=7

[Dunamisx]

I've gone through the platform and see a lot of improvements, though things have really changed from the website and i still remain more interested with the calm and black them form the website appearance together with the overall interface, at least we are going to see that they have meet up to our person taste as required, while as regarding the kyc, we have to to at least get some offers you have also updated concerning that here on the thread.

[joniboini]

We have published a new blog post : https://www.notokyc.com/blog/post.php?id=7

I think it's better to have a separate section for sharing referral links. A blog post should contain more value IMO, if you're just sharing your ref link it won't attract users to read your blog post at all. Well, unless your goal is to build backlinks and improve SEO. At the very least, you should improve the way you write and promote some projects. A guide to using an SMM panel just like you posted previously is much better IMO. Although I do understand that it's hard to go in-depth about sharing referral links for a bot program. CMIIW.

[delfastTions]

We have published a new blog post : https://www.notokyc.com/blog/post.php?id=7

I think it's better to have a separate section for sharing referral links. A blog post should contain more value IMO, if you're just sharing your ref link it won't attract users to read your blog post at all. Well, unless your goal is to build backlinks and improve SEO. At the very least, you should improve the way you write and promote some projects. A guide to using an SMM panel just like you posted previously is much better IMO. Although I do understand that it's hard to go in-depth about sharing referral links for a bot program. CMIIW.

Well, I still think that participating in such referral programs is a rather useless action on the part of all those people who are trying to get passive income in this way. In my opinion, this is a completely unproductive waste of your time and attention.
But of course, I may be wrong and it would be very interesting to read here in the topic a review of at least one user of our forum who managed to get at least some more or less tangible passive income from such activities.
Write if you succeeded.

[joniboini]

I do agree that referral programs aren't attractive for the average joe, but maybe the OP think they have enough traffic to gets enough referrals so they write posts about them. Afterall, it doesn't take a long time to write such content, albeit the quality of such blog post would be low as I mentioned above. I have no problem with casinos or businesses posting ref links on their articles if they are worth reading. Whether the readers should participate or use those businesses is another question imo.

[EarnOnVictor]

I do agree that referral programs aren't attractive for the average joe, but maybe the OP think they have enough traffic to gets enough referrals so they write posts about them.

Lol...but I see it differently these days. If there are fast earning means on the internet today, referral programs are one of them. It now depends on the referer in question, how he understands the business, the quality ways of attracting the customer and the sincerity/purpose of the article/reviews or his attraction means.

I have no problem with casinos or businesses posting ref links on their articles if they are worth reading. Whether the readers should participate or use those businesses is another question imo.

The worthiness of the reading is not what I appreciate the most if not for the sincerity of the review/article and the right choice of the casinos embedded in their links. Many people have been misled by this.

[joniboini]

The worthiness of the reading is not what I appreciate the most if not for the sincerity of the review/article and the right choice of the casinos embedded in their links. Many people have been misled by this.

Well I'm not disagreeing with it. But I'd argue that whether the review/article is honest or not should be included when we judge whether the article is worth reading. I guess it depends on each person but I don't think my post implies they can lie a lot on an article just to promote their ref links. Anyway OP should increase the number of in-depth reviews for No KYC casino since that's the main selling point of their website.

[EarnOnVictor]

The worthiness of the reading is not what I appreciate the most if not for the sincerity of the review/article and the right choice of the casinos embedded in their links. Many people have been misled by this.

Well I'm not disagreeing with it. But I'd argue that whether the review/article is honest or not should be included when we judge whether the article is worth reading. I guess it depends on each person but I don't think my post implies they can lie a lot on an article just to promote their ref links. Anyway OP should increase the number of in-depth reviews for No KYC casino since that's the main selling point of their website.

I believe we are still saying the same thing but just with a twist and I maintain that any article/review of this mind should be done in honesty, otherwise, it is not worth reading. Fine, many might be lured to it one way or another but can only be fooled once to click the link and sign up. If the author's insincerity for the sake of money persists, it will not be long before the website becomes forgotten. So this sincerity doesn't work for the readers/intending customers alone but also for the website's sustainability.

[colo7]

You are advertising TrustDice.win as a cryptocurrency casino without KYC, which is completely untrue.
Being tempted by this advertisement, I registered there, never had an account there before, it was the first time I played there and after I wanted to withdraw 4k+, they immediately demanded KYC from me ....
After checking their ToS, they even have a rule that if the KYC is not completed within 72 hours, they can close the account.

Trust Dice
Review
KYC Level: 0
License: curacao License
Avg. Withdrawal Time:
Instant

3.9 We have the right to carry out “KYC” (Know Your Customer) verification procedures and access to your Member Account may be blocked or closed if you don’t complete KYC verification, don’t provide KYC documents within 72 hours or we determine that you have supplied false or misleading information.

What a dirty trap...

[Dunamisx]

We are to ensure that not every information received online were treated as true, some will have to take our time for more investigation before the fact about them can be established, this is the normal and appropriate way expected, this is not about not being trusted or under doubt, but people have to be careful while on search for what they needed in other not to be deceived or scammed.

[delfastTions]

We are to ensure that not every information received online were treated as true, some will have to take our time for more investigation before the fact about them can be established, this is the normal and appropriate way expected, this is not about not being trusted or under doubt, but people have to be careful while on search for what they needed in other not to be deceived or scammed.

The problem often lies in the fact that it is simply impossible to be sure that the information received from several sources on the Internet is accurate and not a sophisticated falsification. If we add that information often comes through filtering and processing, both by individuals who tend to embellish facts or simply lie, and by AI, which is also trained by no one knows who, then it becomes clear that any information from the network should be treated only with a certain degree of probability that the information corresponds to reality. Unfortunately, humanity has reached the stage of widespread and continuous falsification of real facts.

[Randomlywrite]

.

You are advertising TrustDice.win as a cryptocurrency casino without KYC, which is completely untrue.
Being tempted by this advertisement, I registered there, never had an account there before, it was the first time I played there and after I wanted to withdraw 4k+, they immediately demanded KYC from me ....
After checking their ToS, they even have a rule that if the KYC is not completed within 72 hours, they can close the account.

Trust Dice
Review
KYC Level: 0
License: curacao License
Avg. Withdrawal Time:
Instant

3.9 We have the right to carry out “KYC” (Know Your Customer) verification procedures and access to your Member Account may be blocked or closed if you don’t complete KYC verification, don’t provide KYC documents within 72 hours or we determine that you have supplied false or misleading information.

What a dirty trap...

wow  that is just impressive. i am pretty certain you are the first person i’ve heard of that’s immediately been hit with a “demand” to kyc from there immediately after playing. tbh i’ve not heard of them asking for kyc from anyone unless they have multiple accounts or something like that. i’m in no way saying it couldn’t happen.. just impressed someone managed to make it happen i guess

[delfastTions]

.

You are advertising TrustDice.win as a cryptocurrency casino without KYC, which is completely untrue.
Being tempted by this advertisement, I registered there, never had an account there before, it was the first time I played there and after I wanted to withdraw 4k+, they immediately demanded KYC from me ....
After checking their ToS, they even have a rule that if the KYC is not completed within 72 hours, they can close the account.

Trust Dice
Review
KYC Level: 0
License: curacao License
Avg. Withdrawal Time:
Instant

3.9 We have the right to carry out “KYC” (Know Your Customer) verification procedures and access to your Member Account may be blocked or closed if you don’t complete KYC verification, don’t provide KYC documents within 72 hours or we determine that you have supplied false or misleading information.

What a dirty trap...

wow  that is just impressive. i am pretty certain you are the first person i’ve heard of that’s immediately been hit with a “demand” to kyc from there immediately after playing. tbh i’ve not heard of them asking for kyc from anyone unless they have multiple accounts or something like that. i’m in no way saying it couldn’t happen.. just impressed someone managed to make it happen i guess

I think that such "gifts" to the player in the form of unexpected KYC will be used more and more in many casinos that previously declared themselves as no-KYC casinos or casinos with weak KYC. And the main thing is that the casino can always reasonably or, perhaps, far-fetchedly, explain this by the requirements of local regulators or changes in legislation in the jurisdiction in which this casino is registered. And to check how necessary this requirement is - in practice, this is almost impossible.
This all leads to problems and the loss of money won, which hurts the player much more than he received pleasure from the win, which he loses because of such idiocy.

[Dunamisx]

We are to ensure that not every information received online were treated as true, some will have to take our time for more investigation before the fact about them can be established, this is the normal and appropriate way expected, this is not about not being trusted or under doubt, but people have to be careful while on search for what they needed in other not to be deceived or scammed.

The problem often lies in the fact that it is simply impossible to be sure that the information received from several sources on the Internet is accurate and not a sophisticated falsification. If we add that information often comes through filtering and processing, both by individuals who tend to embellish facts or simply lie, and by AI, which is also trained by no one knows who, then it becomes clear that any information from the network should be treated only with a certain degree of probability that the information corresponds to reality. Unfortunately, humanity has reached the stage of widespread and continuous falsification of real facts.

Definitely sure, we cannot scrutinize on all information completely, even the ones we are used to may be sometimes inconsistent, we are only expected to go for what we can afford, incase of any strange acts or unplanned event, we are going to be able to cope with the out, the internet today is full with all manners of information, not to talk on the gambling sites, we must just be careful in what we do.

[delfastTions]

We are to ensure that not every information received online were treated as true, some will have to take our time for more investigation before the fact about them can be established, this is the normal and appropriate way expected, this is not about not being trusted or under doubt, but people have to be careful while on search for what they needed in other not to be deceived or scammed.

The problem often lies in the fact that it is simply impossible to be sure that the information received from several sources on the Internet is accurate and not a sophisticated falsification. If we add that information often comes through filtering and processing, both by individuals who tend to embellish facts or simply lie, and by AI, which is also trained by no one knows who, then it becomes clear that any information from the network should be treated only with a certain degree of probability that the information corresponds to reality. Unfortunately, humanity has reached the stage of widespread and continuous falsification of real facts.

Definitely sure, we cannot scrutinize on all information completely, even the ones we are used to may be sometimes inconsistent, we are only expected to go for what we can afford, incase of any strange acts or unplanned event, we are going to be able to cope with the out, the internet today is full with all manners of information, not to talk on the gambling sites, we must just be careful in what we do.

Of course, it is extremely difficult, and sometimes simply impossible, to verify information from the Internet. That is why I completely agree with you that one should be careful and not trust some facts stated on the Internet.
There is another feature in this issue, which lies in the process of disseminating information in the process of communication between people. It often happens that information that is false, orally or otherwise transmitted to other people, becomes "verified and reliable" simply because an "authoritative source" begins to broadcast it.
 For example, Time magazine, or Reuters. How many times in history has it happened that they also spread false information.

[EarnOnVictor]

We are to ensure that not every information received online were treated as true, some will have to take our time for more investigation before the fact about them can be established, this is the normal and appropriate way expected, this is not about not being trusted or under doubt, but people have to be careful while on search for what they needed in other not to be deceived or scammed.

The problem often lies in the fact that it is simply impossible to be sure that the information received from several sources on the Internet is accurate and not a sophisticated falsification. If we add that information often comes through filtering and processing, both by individuals who tend to embellish facts or simply lie, and by AI, which is also trained by no one knows who, then it becomes clear that any information from the network should be treated only with a certain degree of probability that the information corresponds to reality. Unfortunately, humanity has reached the stage of widespread and continuous falsification of real facts.

Definitely sure, we cannot scrutinize on all information completely, even the ones we are used to may be sometimes inconsistent, we are only expected to go for what we can afford, incase of any strange acts or unplanned event, we are going to be able to cope with the out, the internet today is full with all manners of information, not to talk on the gambling sites, we must just be careful in what we do.

This advice is good, we cannot trust everything presented to us just as they are presented. We should understand that enough of ugly acts are happening on the internet today and the way we can safeguard our money is to be cautious of how we deal with businesses. Especially the no-KYC casino, this is not to build fear in anyone's mind. Still, in this present age where regulations are bitting, any no-KYC casino should not be so-trusted because if they can be in a country and still find means to survive with that kind of ToS, then their illegality is a big one. I don't think anybody's funds can be safe with such, they can do as they like.

[arwin100]

We are to ensure that not every information received online were treated as true, some will have to take our time for more investigation before the fact about them can be established, this is the normal and appropriate way expected, this is not about not being trusted or under doubt, but people have to be careful while on search for what they needed in other not to be deceived or scammed.

The problem often lies in the fact that it is simply impossible to be sure that the information received from several sources on the Internet is accurate and not a sophisticated falsification. If we add that information often comes through filtering and processing, both by individuals who tend to embellish facts or simply lie, and by AI, which is also trained by no one knows who, then it becomes clear that any information from the network should be treated only with a certain degree of probability that the information corresponds to reality. Unfortunately, humanity has reached the stage of widespread and continuous falsification of real facts.

Definitely sure, we cannot scrutinize on all information completely, even the ones we are used to may be sometimes inconsistent, we are only expected to go for what we can afford, incase of any strange acts or unplanned event, we are going to be able to cope with the out, the internet today is full with all manners of information, not to talk on the gambling sites, we must just be careful in what we do.

This advice is good, we cannot trust everything presented to us just as they are presented. We should understand that enough of ugly acts are happening on the internet today and the way we can safeguard our money is to be cautious of how we deal with businesses. Especially the no-KYC casino, this is not to build fear in anyone's mind. Still, in this present age where regulations are bitting, any no-KYC casino should not be so-trusted because if they can be in a country and still find means to survive with that kind of ToS, then their illegality is a big one. I don't think anybody's funds can be safe with such, they can do as they like.

Many casino from the past stated that they didn't require people to submit a KYC to their platform. But majority of them eventually asked this especially if some people win huge money or there's sudden changes happen on the rules or requirements on their platform.

That's why people should not be so comfortable enough to believe that everything is fine and they can avoid submitting their KYC to any of these casino. Since once they became big and government notice them maybe this KYC thing that some people avoid might really happen. Also its important to read the TOS to know more about the casino and what possible implementation they possibly do in future.

[delfastTions]

We are to ensure that not every information received online were treated as true, some will have to take our time for more investigation before the fact about them can be established, this is the normal and appropriate way expected, this is not about not being trusted or under doubt, but people have to be careful while on search for what they needed in other not to be deceived or scammed.

The problem often lies in the fact that it is simply impossible to be sure that the information received from several sources on the Internet is accurate and not a sophisticated falsification. If we add that information often comes through filtering and processing, both by individuals who tend to embellish facts or simply lie, and by AI, which is also trained by no one knows who, then it becomes clear that any information from the network should be treated only with a certain degree of probability that the information corresponds to reality. Unfortunately, humanity has reached the stage of widespread and continuous falsification of real facts.

Definitely sure, we cannot scrutinize on all information completely, even the ones we are used to may be sometimes inconsistent, we are only expected to go for what we can afford, incase of any strange acts or unplanned event, we are going to be able to cope with the out, the internet today is full with all manners of information, not to talk on the gambling sites, we must just be careful in what we do.

This advice is good, we cannot trust everything presented to us just as they are presented. We should understand that enough of ugly acts are happening on the internet today and the way we can safeguard our money is to be cautious of how we deal with businesses. Especially the no-KYC casino, this is not to build fear in anyone's mind. Still, in this present age where regulations are bitting, any no-KYC casino should not be so-trusted because if they can be in a country and still find means to survive with that kind of ToS, then their illegality is a big one. I don't think anybody's funds can be safe with such, they can do as they like.

Many casino from the past stated that they didn't require people to submit a KYC to their platform. But majority of them eventually asked this especially if some people win huge money or there's sudden changes happen on the rules or requirements on their platform.

That's why people should not be so comfortable enough to believe that everything is fine and they can avoid submitting their KYC to any of these casino. Since once they became big and government notice them maybe this KYC thing that some people avoid might really happen. Also its important to read the TOS to know more about the casino and what possible implementation they possibly do in future.

By the way, I think that usually, in order not to scare potential casino clients in advance, who need to remain anonymous in gambling, in the ToS of the most cunning casinos the issue of the need for KYC is bypassed or somehow veiled so that the user initially thinks that he can safely play and remain anonymous. But of course, this is all cunning and the requirements of regulators, based on local laws in the financial sphere, any casino will eventually begin to comply if it becomes large and noticeable to local authorities from the state power.
So no matter what is written in the ToS about KYC or nothing at all and only a formal reference to compliance with the laws, it still seems that everything is moving towards the widespread introduction of personal identification procedures.