🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Ruttoshi]

don't encourage using KYC casinos. Just find a reputable no-KYC casino.

It's no that I don't value my privacy and support KYC casino, I will prefer to use a reputable no KYC casino but it's difficult to find any because they are operating under a government that must regulate them and approve their operation, and if they don't comply, license wouldn't be given to them. This was why I said that in my post above.

You know how the government moves round looking for any service that supports privacy in order for them to see how they can shut down such service or make them centralized if they agree to it. I wouldn't blame any casino that asks for KYC because they are out for business and they need to comply with the government.

[InpulseX]

don't encourage using KYC casinos. Just find a reputable no-KYC casino.

It's no that I don't value my privacy and support KYC casino, I will prefer to use a reputable no KYC casino but it's difficult to find any because they are operating under a government that must regulate them and approve their operation, and if they don't comply, license wouldn't be given to them. This was why I said that in my post above.

You know how the government moves round looking for any service that supports privacy in order for them to see how they can shut down such service or make them centralized if they agree to it. I wouldn't blame any casino that asks for KYC because they are out for business and they need to comply with the government.

If casino has licence it must follow the conditions of this licence and follow some rules in its work.

And one of the conditions of the licence is follow the KYC procedures because the state authorities want to contrall not only casinos but also the players of casinos.

They want to have the ful informations about winners and their personal datas.

[Cointxz]

don't encourage using KYC casinos. Just find a reputable no-KYC casino.

It's no that I don't value my privacy and support KYC casino, I will prefer to use a reputable no KYC casino but it's difficult to find any because they are operating under a government that must regulate them and approve their operation, and if they don't comply, license wouldn't be given to them. This was why I said that in my post above.

You know how the government moves round looking for any service that supports privacy in order for them to see how they can shut down such service or make them centralized if they agree to it. I wouldn't blame any casino that asks for KYC because they are out for business and they need to comply with the government.

If casino has licence it must follow the conditions of this licence and follow some rules in its work.

And one of the conditions of the licence is follow the KYC procedures because the state authorities want to contrall not only casinos but also the players of casinos.

They want to have the ful informations about winners and their personal datas.

Correct. License is always preferred for a casino here while it contradicts to other preferences of players which is privacy.

Playing on casino with no license is very dangerous and proven already since many unlicensed casino in the past runaway with players money.

I hope many no KYC casino will become reputable listed on this site so that user here will have choice for trusted no KYC casino that is very hard to find these days.

[i8v8i]

If casino has licence it must follow the conditions of this licence and follow some rules in its work.

And one of the conditions of the licence is follow the KYC procedures because the state authorities want to contrall not only casinos but also the players of casinos.

They want to have the ful informations about winners and their personal datas.

Correct. License is always preferred for a casino here while it contradicts to other preferences of players which is privacy.

Playing on casino with no license is very dangerous and proven already since many unlicensed casino in the past runaway with players money.

I hope many no KYC casino will become reputable listed on this site so that user here will have choice for trusted no KYC casino that is very hard to find these days.

[/quote]

When there is no licenes which casino has there is no rules at casino too.

Such casinos can not pay big wins for their players or can choose the rules any time it wants.

It is very risky to play in casino which change the rules many times or does not follow any rules at all.

[virasog]

Correct. License is always preferred for a casino here while it contradicts to other preferences of players which is privacy.

Playing on casino with no license is very dangerous and proven already since many unlicensed casino in the past runaway with players money.

I hope many no KYC casino will become reputable listed on this site so that user here will have choice for trusted no KYC casino that is very hard to find these days.

Why gamblers prefer licensed casinos? The main reason is that it is understood that the licensed casino cannot afford to scam players because the news would spread instantly and destroy their business (the license authority also). Also it is believed that licensed casino play a role in vetting the casino, take a look at their payment history record and filtering out the bad actors before issuing them the license.

Also some operate with licenses from jurisdictions that are more flexible with privacy (like Curacao) and licenses from those are relatively easy to get and therefore most casinos are licensed from Curacao.

[TopTort777]

Why gamblers prefer licensed casinos? The main reason is that it is understood that the licensed casino cannot afford to scam players because the news would spread instantly and destroy their business (the license authority also). Also it is believed that licensed casino play a role in vetting the casino, take a look at their payment history record and filtering out the bad actors before issuing them the license.

Also some operate with licenses from jurisdictions that are more flexible with privacy (like Curacao) and licenses from those are relatively easy to get and therefore most casinos are licensed from Curacao.

Once I also thought that if casino has a license it is a guarantee of not being scammed. Then someone posted in gambling forum section numbers and it turned out that it aint that costly. I have searches in google and found following. Site shows different info and prices, but in general, its cost less than 50k EUR to have a fully licenses casino. This is not the most correct page, but prices more or less are the same (according to google search).

Attract 500 customers that will deposit 100 bucks (which isnt that hard and and most can afford imho) and you have licenses paid off. And you are free to do with casino whatever you want.

[Cointxz]

Why gamblers prefer licensed casinos? The main reason is that it is understood that the licensed casino cannot afford to scam players because the news would spread instantly and destroy their business (the license authority also). Also it is believed that licensed casino play a role in vetting the casino, take a look at their payment history record and filtering out the bad actors before issuing them the license.

Also some operate with licenses from jurisdictions that are more flexible with privacy (like Curacao) and licenses from those are relatively easy to get and therefore most casinos are licensed from Curacao.

Once I also thought that if casino has a license it is a guarantee of not being scammed. Then someone posted in gambling forum section numbers and it turned out that it aint that costly. I have searches in google and found following. Site shows different info and prices, but in general, its cost less than 50k EUR to have a fully licenses casino. This is not the most correct page, but prices more or less are the same (according to google search).

Attract 500 customers that will deposit 100 bucks (which isnt that hard and and most can afford imho) and you have licenses paid off. And you are free to do with casino whatever you want.

It’s not 100% guaranteed that they will not scam but you will lessen the chance if being scam since they are registered under a company that has details of their operations legal information.

While anonymous casino that doesn’t have license can exit scam out of thin air without any track or way to file a complaint against them.

So licenses casino is always preferred by players that wants to have some sense of safety instead of relying to trust basis. We are already done on that era, Even Bitcoin is now being regulated through exchange.

[Fomo_Chronicles]

It’s not 100% guaranteed that they will not scam but you will lessen the chance if being scam since they are registered under a company that has details of their operations legal information.

While anonymous casino that doesn’t have license can exit scam out of thin air without any track or way to file a complaint against them.

So licenses casino is always preferred by players that wants to have some sense of safety instead of relying to trust basis. We are already done on that era, Even Bitcoin is now being regulated through exchange.

Everything can changed very quickly even legislation. The rules change too.

There is no garanty at all even if you play in licence casino that the legislation will not change and the casino will not be closed.

Sometimes even licenced casino do not pay big wins and are closed. In such case nobody can get back their money.

[Zwei]

so are we just going to act like everything is normal here?
does no one care about the obv chill accounts, the dangerous false NO KYC exchange widget, and the other stuff?

i don't want to sound like a broken record by saying this over and over again, but people used to care more about this kind of shit.

[TopTort777]

Ok, lets leave shilling on conscience of those who have chosen such method or place to post/promote/make "UP" of this topic in such a way/level up their forum accounts.

Lets start from that casino section. What is the problem here? Casinos from the list on notokyc.com are trusted (at least I dont see no obvious scammers there). Its a knows fact that they might ask for KYC any time, but the same way they may also not do it.

You dont like exchange widget? I have no experience with it. It is from https://exolix.com/ affiliate partnership? Is exolix scam or require KYC ? ( I am not familiar with it)

[gunhell16]

don't encourage using KYC casinos. Just find a reputable no-KYC casino.

It's no that I don't value my privacy and support KYC casino, I will prefer to use a reputable no KYC casino but it's difficult to find any because they are operating under a government that must regulate them and approve their operation, and if they don't comply, license wouldn't be given to them. This was why I said that in my post above.

You know how the government moves round looking for any service that supports privacy in order for them to see how they can shut down such service or make them centralized if they agree to it. I wouldn't blame any casino that asks for KYC because they are out for business and they need to comply with the government.

Nowadays, there are really a lot of regulated casinos. And when it comes to requiring KYC, I think it’s starting to be accepted by other parts of the crypto community. Only a few people can still be considered strictly against KYC, though even if they prefer it that way, for the most part, they can’t really do anything about it.

So, if a casino requires KYC but is reputable, I think that’s fine with me — especially if it has already been running in the crypto gambling business for several years.
I also know that many communities are now aware of this and already know what they need to do.

[ultrloa]

don't encourage using KYC casinos. Just find a reputable no-KYC casino.

It's no that I don't value my privacy and support KYC casino, I will prefer to use a reputable no KYC casino but it's difficult to find any because they are operating under a government that must regulate them and approve their operation, and if they don't comply, license wouldn't be given to them. This was why I said that in my post above.

You know how the government moves round looking for any service that supports privacy in order for them to see how they can shut down such service or make them centralized if they agree to it. I wouldn't blame any casino that asks for KYC because they are out for business and they need to comply with the government.

Nowadays, there are really a lot of regulated casinos. And when it comes to requiring KYC, I think it’s starting to be accepted by other parts of the crypto community. Only a few people can still be considered strictly against KYC, though even if they prefer it that way, for the most part, they can’t really do anything about it.

So, if a casino requires KYC but is reputable, I think that’s fine with me — especially if it has already been running in the crypto gambling business for several years.
I also know that many communities are now aware of this and already know what they need to do.

Its been accepted by most crypto gambling community since it became a new normal now especially that regulation has been tighten up with those big crypto casinos operating around.

Also those implementing no KYC platform just like them raise some doubts for some people who already accept those new changes. People might still against KYC but with latest happening in the scene I guess they can adopt with it if they still want to gamble.

And don't mind those reputable casino asking KYC since its part of the requirements now. I don't know if there are people doubting to try what they are trying to implement here but let see if they can able to sustain this since somehow maybe they would get an issue on legal side especially if government try to interfere their operation.

[Backed_Finance]

Nowadays, there are really a lot of regulated casinos. And when it comes to requiring KYC, I think it’s starting to be accepted by other parts of the crypto community. Only a few people can still be considered strictly against KYC, though even if they prefer it that way, for the most part, they can’t really do anything about it.

So, if a casino requires KYC but is reputable, I think that’s fine with me — especially if it has already been running in the crypto gambling business for several years.
I also know that many communities are now aware of this and already know what they need to do.

It is rather simple to get a licence that is why there are so many regulated casinos.

But it is necessary to remember that all regulated casinos mus follow the rules, including KYC procedures.

[CTM_Marketing]

Nowadays, there are really a lot of regulated casinos. And when it comes to requiring KYC, I think it’s starting to be accepted by other parts of the crypto community. Only a few people can still be considered strictly against KYC, though even if they prefer it that way, for the most part, they can’t really do anything about it.

So, if a casino requires KYC but is reputable, I think that’s fine with me — especially if it has already been running in the crypto gambling business for several years.
I also know that many communities are now aware of this and already know what they need to do.

It is rather simple to get a licence that is why there are so many regulated casinos.

But it is necessary to remember that all regulated casinos mus follow the rules, including KYC procedures.

It is better to play in regulated casino which must to follow some rules that to risk and play in unregulated casino.
But all regulated casinos must follow the rules. That is why in all regulated casinos KYC rules are obligatory especially when the wins are big.

[Cointxz]

It’s not 100% guaranteed that they will not scam but you will lessen the chance if being scam since they are registered under a company that has details of their operations legal information.

While anonymous casino that doesn’t have license can exit scam out of thin air without any track or way to file a complaint against them.

So licenses casino is always preferred by players that wants to have some sense of safety instead of relying to trust basis. We are already done on that era, Even Bitcoin is now being regulated through exchange.

Everything can changed very quickly even legislation. The rules change too.

There is no garanty at all even if you play in licence casino that the legislation will not change and the casino will not be closed.

Sometimes even licenced casino do not pay big wins and are closed. In such case nobody can get back their money.

Your opinion is valid but the main point I’m just trying to emphasize here that if a license casino is already scamming users so it’s worst or easier for no license casino to scam user.

No KYC casino requires 100% trust basis since user has no legal information about the company that operating it.

I’m not suggesting no KYC/unlicensed casino is bad but license casino is just easier to trust especially on new casino.

[Angry_Kitty]

Your opinion is valid but the main point I’m just trying to emphasize here that if a license casino is already scamming users so it’s worst or easier for no license casino to scam user.

No KYC casino requires 100% trust basis since user has no legal information about the company that operating it.

I’m not suggesting no KYC/unlicensed casino is bad but license casino is just easier to trust especially on new casino.

I think that license casino scaming users because it is rather simple to get a license.
Sometimes for casino it is more simple to scam users and do not pay the big wings because they do not take care about licence.
It it more simple for them to create a new casino with license then to pay big wings.

[CTM_Marketing]

Your opinion is valid but the main point I’m just trying to emphasize here that if a license casino is already scamming users so it’s worst or easier for no license casino to scam user.

No KYC casino requires 100% trust basis since user has no legal information about the company that operating it.

I’m not suggesting no KYC/unlicensed casino is bad but license casino is just easier to trust especially on new casino.

I think that license casino scaming users because it is rather simple to get a license.
Sometimes for casino it is more simple to scam users and do not pay the big wings because they do not take care about licence.
It it more simple for them to create a new casino with license then to pay big wings.

Only time can show if casino is good or bad. Usually good casinos live for a long time and scam casino can not live a long time because after sometime everything becomes clear.

But If casino becomes a scam I am thinking what it will be with personal data of users. How they will be used in scam casino nobody knows 

[Backed_Finance]

Your opinion is valid but the main point I’m just trying to emphasize here that if a license casino is already scamming users so it’s worst or easier for no license casino to scam user.

No KYC casino requires 100% trust basis since user has no legal information about the company that operating it.

I’m not suggesting no KYC/unlicensed casino is bad but license casino is just easier to trust especially on new casino.

I think that license casino scaming users because it is rather simple to get a license.
Sometimes for casino it is more simple to scam users and do not pay the big wings because they do not take care about licence.
It it more simple for them to create a new casino with license then to pay big wings.

Only time can show if casino is good or bad. Usually good casinos live for a long time and scam casino can not live a long time because after sometime everything becomes clear.

But If casino becomes a scam I am thinking what it will be with personal data of users. How they will be used in scam casino nobody knows 

If casino lives a long time people trust it more and more. More and more people play in such casino and they spend a lot of money in casino because they trust it.

But even such casino can closed. And nobody knows what it will be with personal data of players which players provided to casino.

If canino closed such personal data can be used everywhere and for different reasons.

This is one of the main problem why many people do not like to give their personal data.

[Buakaw_Club]

If casino lives a long time people trust it more and more. More and more people play in such casino and they spend a lot of money in casino because they trust it.

But even such casino can closed. And nobody knows what it will be with personal data of players which players provided to casino.

If canino closed such personal data can be used everywhere and for different reasons.

This is one of the main problem why many people do not like to give their personal data.

I think that the time of living casino is important for users. For casino reputation is very important and only time can show the real reputation of the casino.
It is so difficult to get a good reputation because it takes a lot of time for it but it is really very simple to lose such reputation.
That is why mostly casinos prefer to safe their reputation.

Many people do not want to pass KYC procedures because they do not know what it will be with their personal data.
People must be sure that their personal data are kept in a safe place and will not be hacked and not be used for cryminal perposes.

[internetional]

I visited the site and looked through the list.
I see that besides casinos, there are also exchangers and other services.
But there are too few exchangers (not even the well-known ones that are active on this forum), and especially too few other sites. In the "Others" category there's only BitRefill.
Such a weak selection immediately makes it look unserious, and I'm unlikely to use this site to search for new no-KYC services. I'd rather go to kycnot.me - the list there is incomparably broader.
However, casinos as a category are completely absent from kycnot.me. And in this field, notokyc.com definitely outperforms its competitors.
Maybe it would be better to remove the "Exchange" and "Others" categories altogether? Their contents discourage visitors and give the impression that your selection is frankly weak.