🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[ginsan]

Not only you, many gamblers, especially high bettors, don’t claim deposit bonuses simply because they know the catch behind them.
They know that if they make a deposit and claim, let’s say, the 100% bonus, thrn instead of having to wager their initial deposit only once before they can withdraw their winnings, they will need to wager it 30× or even more, which statistically means way less chances of making any profits.
Deposit bonuses are meant mainly to attract new customers and you should claim them only if you are interested in playing for longer or when you are certain you can meet the wagering requirement attached to them.

That's what's really annoying, I mean because the combined deposit and welcome bonus will usually be combined into one main balance, as I experienced at one of the casinos, so winnings of 1x the capital cannot be withdrawn because we have to fulfill the betting requirements to be able to withdraw the winnings we get. Instead of chasing bets that are applied, for example x30 and without realizing the balance we have is getting smaller because every bet we lose and this is all triggered by our desire to reach the x30 bet in order to meet the requirements to be able to withdraw the winnings.

I understand, sir, that newcomers are usually given big bonuses with specified deposit requirements. However, I am no longer interested in the bonuses offered by casinos because with deposit bonuses we are no longer consistent in gambling. But every gambler definitely has various thoughts and they like to claim bonuses because they are not active gamblers but rather gamblers who like to get rid of stressful thoughts in the gambling they play.

[cryptoserega]

That's what's really annoying, I mean because the combined deposit and welcome bonus will usually be combined into one main balance, as I experienced at one of the casinos, so winnings of 1x the capital cannot be withdrawn because we have to fulfill the betting requirements to be able to withdraw the winnings we get. Instead of chasing bets that are applied, for example x30 and without realizing the balance we have is getting smaller because every bet we lose and this is all triggered by our desire to reach the x30 bet in order to meet the requirements to be able to withdraw the winnings.

I understand, sir, that newcomers are usually given big bonuses with specified deposit requirements. However, I am no longer interested in the bonuses offered by casinos because with deposit bonuses we are no longer consistent in gambling. But every gambler definitely has various thoughts and they like to claim bonuses because they are not active gamblers but rather gamblers who like to get rid of stressful thoughts in the gambling they play.

Now there are so many different casinos that it is impossible to attract attention of users without giving bonuses.

If casino will not offer different bonuses and prices gamblers will prefer to use other casinos that provide such bonuses.

If people want to play casino he will play without checking conditions of providing such bonuses.

It is very simple to get a bonus but to withdraw it it becomes more difficult. You must play a lot in casino and usually make your own deposit. And to get ability to withdraw you bonues you had to make new deposits and play more and more in casino.

[Finebone]

No KYC Crypto Casino or Casino that doesn’t require KYC at first but later on you will be ask once you already register and deposit some money. Most of the casino with Curaçao license has the tendency to apply KYC when they see fit base on the circumstances given to the user.

I doubt this casino that you listed will totally not apply KYC even with some special cases that user is showing some shady behavior in the casino. Only decentralized casino are the only true non kyc casino.

When I first saw the title of the op post, No KYC crypto casino & site, it was due to curiosity that made me even try to look at what the op is talking about, because i have seen so many casino saying that it's a no kyc casino, but at the end when trying to make withdrawal, they will start asking for it, so i really don't think that it's no kyc casino at all, as the name of the casino implies, at some point they will demand for it.
And you are very correct here, it's only Decentralized casino, that are truly a no kyc casino.

[betswift]

^ It's all written in the T&C usually, with a fine print or not is another deal.

So before jumping into any platform, big or small, KYC or not, we need to read carefully at least their bonus policy and withdrawal policies.

[adultcrypto]

^ It's all written in the T&C usually, with a fine print or not is another deal.

So before jumping into any platform, big or small, KYC or not, we need to read carefully at least their bonus policy and withdrawal policies.

Bonus policy is important to those who are chasing bonus but never to genuine gamblers who have the capital to gamble and are only looking for platform where they will gamble and not have problem with withdrawals. That is to say that the integrity and reputation of the casino is one of the most important things gamblers look at than their bonuses. If a casino claim to be a no KYC casino, them sticking to that and not asking for KYC when there is winning, is more important to most gamblers than their bonus.

[Mr Reporter]

But nobody knows how long will be alive a no KYC casinos which does not have any licences yet.

I think that it is possible to play in such casinos with not big sums of money.

But the question is how many people can stop playing casino and not to start to play with big money.

Because always you want to win more and more.

Do you know how many no -KYC casinos

I do not know the how many no-KYC casinos excactly but there are a lof of no-KYC casinos

Why it is so   Because there is a big demand in no-KYC casinos and many people prefer anonimity when they are playing different games in casino.

I think No KYC casinos is the same as decentralized casinos because once the casino team does not ask users for KYC verification, it is automatically a No KYC casino and their are many of them we can use to play bet and not to be scared of the team asking for our verification. If you know any other non KYC casinos you can tell me since is like you know some of them.  Some gamblers are not cool with dropping their credentials for a casino to scrutinize them and after that, it might be kept in a folder that might get stolen and sold to scammers.

No KYC casinos and decentralized casinos aren't exactly the same, though they share some similarities and also have noticed that no KYC casino offer an alternative for users who really value anonymity and privacy, honestly speaking even most of the gamblers im around with would not advertise a person to add up your personal data into a casino just for the sake of registration,

Well Traditional online casinos that don't require Know Your Customer (KYC) verification should not ask for verification using your data to access it.

[Promocodeudo]

When I first saw the title of the op post, No KYC crypto casino & site, it was due to curiosity that made me even try to look at what the op is talking about, because i have seen so many casino saying that it's a no kyc casino, but at the end when trying to make withdrawal, they will start asking for it, so i really don't think that it's no kyc casino at all, as the name of the casino implies, at some point they will demand for it.
And you are very correct here, it's only Decentralized casino, that are truly a no kyc casino.

This has always been the case with many casinos but what's the need of saying No kyc at onset and doing otherwise when it comes to withdrawal thats not nice, I think the words of any service provider from the beginning should remain their word, nothing should change, any casino that does this, is shouldn't be trusted because it is like breaking the rules they created, I think anything that concerns casinos and their players should be clearly written in the terms and conditions and if any review of such terms should take effect I think there was to do it, i know that casinos are business and without players such business won't stand, that's it is good gri them to keep to their words and uplifting their reputation, although I have not tried this particular casino and I believe with time we will know if they are really no KYC casino.

[Joy- maker]

Quite an interesting list and it's very good for people who reall don't like gambling sites that enforce KYC on their customers, there are some sites that have licenses and don't enforce KYC, but I don't know how long they last? On average, casinos that already have large valuations and can be accessed by many people from various countries, usually at that point they impose KYC, especially if during their operational journey these casinos are used for illegal acts such as money laundering and so on by users of their services that can be detrimental, there is no choice they will enforce because of course they will get pressure from the local government or in every country that can access the site.

Don't you think that it is risky to play on a non-KYC unknown casino? Yes, they will keep giving you small withdrawals without KYC but as soon as you win something big, all of sudden they will realize that you need to do KYC as how you won this big amount. In most of the cases, they will never approve your KYC and never let you withdraw.

If you want to just play for fun, then these casinos may be the right choice for you but if you really want the casino to let you withdraw for all your wins, then you need to register and play at trusted KYC gambling casino.

I can remember back then when I was gambling on a no KYC platform which I can't really recall the name of that platform because it's been long, although the platform is not popular like the ones we are having today. So during the registration process no KYC was required and  I was cool with that, normally when ever I fund my gambling wallet on a gambling platform I don't always withdraw my wins I Leave those wins on the wallet and then gamble with it when ever I want to gamble instead of funding another money, so I gambled and gambled on this platform for a very long time I was not making any withdrawal, so reaching one day I decided to make a withdrawal on the platform to get the little things I needed at that time since i wasn't having money on me that Day, and gest what buddy when I clicked on the withdraw KYC was required all of a sudden which I provided my KYC as requested and it wasn't verified and I left that platform with my wins inside I couldn't withdraw any.

[khaled0111]

No there are obligatory KYC procedures not only in cryptocurrency exchanges but also on casinos. Many casinos use cyrptocurrency but if casino has licence it must follow KYC procedures.

I couldn’t quite get what you are disagreeing with exactly! I have read your post multiple times and you are literally repeating what he said. He didn’t even mention the word "exchange" in his post. Am I missing something here?

It is necessary to pass KYC procedures for users to withraw their monye neally in all regulated and licenced casinos.

Not always true. On many licensed casinos, you can still make withdrawals without necessarily having to pass kyc first. Of course, you may be required to verify your identity at some point but that won’t necessarily happen when you make a withdrawal request.

[Lida93]

Nowadays, cryptocurrency regulation is becoming stricter, and I believe that soon there will be no casinos that operate without KYC. I think that if a casino operates without KYC, it can be shut down at any time, and it would be very risky for players to play in such casinos, as they could be closed quickly and players would not have enough time to withdraw their money.

Government are sleeplessly doing all they can to deny us our privacy and that's why they always kick against anything that promotes the idea of decentralisation. The involvement of government into cryptocurrency wasn't to just make some profits through the system but to also make sure they infiltrate it with it's long arm of regulations, and just as you have rightly said, this posed a risk to customers of any complete decentralised platforms and even the platforms itself from abrupt shutdown.

[EarnOnVictor]

No there are obligatory KYC procedures not only in cryptocurrency exchanges but also on casinos. Many casinos use cyrptocurrency but if casino has licence it must follow KYC procedures.

I couldn’t quite get what you are disagreeing with exactly! I have read your post multiple times and you are literally repeating what he said. He didn’t even mention the word "exchange" in his post. Am I missing something here?

You are right in your post and not missing anything, bro. The only issue is that you replied to the post of the wrong person and continued to converse as well. I tried to trace the post so I can read it fully to know what transpired, but unfortunately, it has been deleted. The link is just taking me back to the same place. The same thing is applicable to the post replied to by @Lida93 that's right below your own, which was supposed to be here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5465690.msg65913473#msg65913473. The guy has also deleted it, as it takes me back to the same place.

I don't know what's wrong with some people, they often spam, and having noticed they are caught, they delete the posts.

[DaNNy001]

Nowadays, cryptocurrency regulation is becoming stricter, and I believe that soon there will be no casinos that operate without KYC. I think that if a casino operates without KYC, it can be shut down at any time, and it would be very risky for players to play in such casinos, as they could be closed quickly and players would not have enough time to withdraw their money.

Government are sleeplessly doing all they can to deny us our privacy and that's why they always kick against anything that promotes the idea of decentralisation. The involvement of government into cryptocurrency wasn't to just make some profits through the system but to also make sure they infiltrate it with it's long arm of regulations, and just as you have rightly said, this posed a risk to customers of any complete decentralised platforms and even the platforms itself from abrupt shutdown.

But aside the government infiltration, there are lots of implications too towards the submission of KYC on casino platforms. I think not quite long ago one of the most reputable casinos here was attacked and hacked although not directly the casino but a third party provider that aided them in submission of data of customers and in the official notice I think lots of customers details were stolen from this third party provider.

[Agbamoni]

This has always been the case with many casinos but what's the need of saying No kyc at onset and doing otherwise when it comes to withdrawal thats not nice, I think the words of any service provider from the beginning should remain their word, nothing should change, any casino that does this, is shouldn't be trusted because it is like breaking the rules they created, I think anything that concerns casinos and their players should be clearly written in the terms and conditions and if any review of such terms should take effect I think there was to do it, i know that casinos are business and without players such business won't stand, that's it is good gri them to keep to their words and uplifting their reputation, although I have not tried this particular casino and I believe with time we will know if they are really no KYC casino.

That is how you differentiate a trusted and reliable casino from a non-reputable casino. Lies!
You cant force them to change their rules because they will surely do whatever they like. Like i said in a previous but related thread that the players are to be blamed. A review need to be done on a casino before depositing huge money there to play. First, their Tos need to be carefully read, and then little amount should be deposited to test the game and check their withdrawal, hopefully before now we have check if they have pass regulation and gotten their license.

[khaled0111]

...

Nice catch, EarnOnVictor.
I checked both profiles and based on their post history, it wouldn’t even surprise me if they turn out to be controlled by the same person.
Not sure why they chose to post in this thread in particular ad I suppose they already know they are unlikely to get any merits on the gambling board.
Sorry for derailing the thread from the main discussion.

[liuka]

I noticed that Notokyc has partnered with Octoswap. This is certainly a great partner, as it makes it easier to swap on Octoswap and deposit into Notokyc.

Sometimes, partners like this can have a significant impact, attracting new players to on the notokyc.

Source: https://x.com/octo_swap/status/1977178418778456430?t=9O5SKXOHe99aGPqr9ws67Q&s=19

So that casinos don't require KYC is certainly a key factor in choosing Notokyc. Furthermore, Notokyc is also very active on X, offering numerous rewards to those who follow the Notokyc account.

 https://x.com/NoToKYC/status/1977690997430628757?t=k_zygMV3yC7QGaEPS-uLrg&s=19

[TopTort777]

Furthermore, Notokyc is also very active on X, offering numerous rewards to those who follow the Notokyc account.

 https://x.com/NoToKYC/status/1977690997430628757?t=k_zygMV3yC7QGaEPS-uLrg&s=19

I have checked addresses that were dropped below that tweet, but till now nobody got anything. So I am curious who they have chosen to reward. Btw notokyc wagering contest has ended. Awaiting for the results and info how they going to choose the winner. Looks like easy money, as they choose 3 winners and there are only 7 participants.

[SuperBitMan]

Nowadays, cryptocurrency regulation is becoming stricter, and I believe that soon there will be no casinos that operate without KYC. I think that if a casino operates without KYC, it can be shut down at any time, and it would be very risky for players to play in such casinos, as they could be closed quickly and players would not have enough time to withdraw their money.

Government are sleeplessly doing all they can to deny us our privacy and that's why they always kick against anything that promotes the idea of decentralisation. The involvement of government into cryptocurrency wasn't to just make some profits through the system but to also make sure they infiltrate it with it's long arm of regulations, and just as you have rightly said, this posed a risk to customers of any complete decentralised platforms and even the platforms itself from abrupt shutdown.

The government needs money in the form of our taxes, and the more money it needs, the stricter the laws become. It's no secret that cryptocurrencies are used to avoid paying taxes. In almost all countries, casinos have very high taxes on their winnings, and the casinos themselves pay high taxes. Therefore, it's not surprising that neither the casinos nor the casino players want to pay taxes.

Right now a lot of government in many nation have notice that some set of people or some companies for example casino uses cryptocurrency in order to avoid paying of tax I don't think that is the case anymore in some countries right now because they have developed their self and the tax even crypto users, right now in some country as a crypto casino you will be paying your tax and even crypto casino users will also pay indirectly.
Any exchange you are using to fund your casino the government of that country takes the taxes from that exchange and in return the transactions you are making the exchange company deduct some money from you and that money is the money they use in paying their tax to the government.
Some country that were against cryptocurrency have seen that if they continue to be against cryptocurrency they won't be able to take some taxes and so for that reason they decided to modify their law.

[gunhell16]

When I first saw the title of the op post, No KYC crypto casino & site, it was due to curiosity that made me even try to look at what the op is talking about, because i have seen so many casino saying that it's a no kyc casino, but at the end when trying to make withdrawal, they will start asking for it, so i really don't think that it's no kyc casino at all, as the name of the casino implies, at some point they will demand for it.
And you are very correct here, it's only Decentralized casino, that are truly a no kyc casino.

This has always been the case with many casinos but what's the need of saying No kyc at onset and doing otherwise when it comes to withdrawal thats not nice, I think the words of any service provider from the beginning should remain their word, nothing should change, any casino that does this, is shouldn't be trusted because it is like breaking the rules they created, I think anything that concerns casinos and their players should be clearly written in the terms and conditions and if any review of such terms should take effect I think there was to do it, i know that casinos are business and without players such business won't stand, that's it is good gri them to keep to their words and uplifting their reputation, although I have not tried this particular casino and I believe with time we will know if they are really no KYC casino.

If I'm not mistaken, the rules of the game providers for the casinos seem to be separate or different compared to the rules of the casino platform itself where we play as players.

That's because I think I've already read something here in our forum where the actual problem or issue came from the game provider owner, not from the casino itself where the gaming providers are hosted on the platform.

[panjul07]

Furthermore, Notokyc is also very active on X, offering numerous rewards to those who follow the Notokyc account.

 https://x.com/NoToKYC/status/1977690997430628757?t=k_zygMV3yC7QGaEPS-uLrg&s=19

I have checked addresses that were dropped below that tweet, but till now nobody got anything. So I am curious who they have chosen to reward. Btw notokyc wagering contest has ended. Awaiting for the results and info how they going to choose the winner. Looks like easy money, as they choose 3 winners and there are only 7 participants.

Just noticed that this contest which is called by wagering contest is actually not a wagering contest because the winners is drawn based on the tickets they collected by wagering.
It should be called as raffle/lottery than wagering contest because the winners are not purely based on who wager the most but who will be lucky enough in the drawing.
Although those who wagered more will be get bigger chance to win because of having much more tickets, there is still no guarantee that the player who wager most will be the winner.
Unlucky time may come for those who wager most and on the other side lucky time may come for those who wager less.

[xLays]

Furthermore, Notokyc is also very active on X, offering numerous rewards to those who follow the Notokyc account.

 https://x.com/NoToKYC/status/1977690997430628757?t=k_zygMV3yC7QGaEPS-uLrg&s=19

I have checked addresses that were dropped below that tweet, but till now nobody got anything. So I am curious who they have chosen to reward. Btw notokyc wagering contest has ended. Awaiting for the results and info how they going to choose the winner. Looks like easy money, as they choose 3 winners and there are only 7 participants.

I thought you joined that contest since you seemed interested, but when I checked the thread, I didn’t see your name there.

Anyway, I’m also waiting for the results as I’m one of the participants. I only got 58 tickets. I’m curious how many tickets the other participants got since their wagers aren’t public or posted on that thread..

The question is, among those 7 participants did NoToKYC actually make a profit or just break even for promotional purposes? I’m sure it’s mainly for promotion, but they could still make some profit through affiliate earnings.