🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Mahdirakib]

Anyway, I’m also waiting for the results as I’m one of the participants. I only got 58 tickets. I’m curious how many tickets the other participants got since their wagers aren’t public or posted on that thread..

You have a good number of entries for this contest. Maybe I have the lowest number of entries for this contest. I got the opportunity to play at one casino only, and I didn't like that platform. That's why I had made a small deposit and lost it with a few hundred dollars wager. The website doesn't even show how much I have wagered until now.

The question is, among those 7 participants did NoToKYC actually make a profit or just break even for promotional purposes? I’m sure it’s mainly for promotion, but they could still make some profit through affiliate earnings.

I believe it wasn't a profitable contest for them. It isn't possible to generate revenue within a short time by running a contest like this. It would have been better for them if they occasionally gave updates with the number of tickets of each participant.

[Obari]

When I first saw the title of the op post, No KYC crypto casino & site, it was due to curiosity that made me even try to look at what the op is talking about, because i have seen so many casino saying that it's a no kyc casino, but at the end when trying to make withdrawal, they will start asking for it, so i really don't think that it's no kyc casino at all, as the name of the casino implies, at some point they will demand for it.
And you are very correct here, it's only Decentralized casino, that are truly a no kyc casino.

Edited out

If I'm not mistaken, the rules of the game providers for the casinos seem to be separate or different compared to the rules of the casino platform itself where we play as players.

That's because I think I've already read something here in our forum where the actual problem or issue came from the game provider owner, not from the casino itself where the gaming providers are hosted on the platform.

As it stands now, i believe that the players these days are not so much bothered about a casino having KYC on their platforms but lying about it, is what annoys the people and they feel like cheated especially when they are asked of KYC during a withdrawal.
As a new casino, you should focus more on your revenues and peoples option about you and things they don’t like, and try to fix it and in all you do as a casino, please be always straight forward with your rules so avoid confusions.
If a casino wants to get KYC they should do it from the onset, especially from registration or maybe during depositing and it waiting till it is time to withdrawal which is always frustrating.

[liuka]

I have checked addresses that were dropped below that tweet, but till now nobody got anything. So I am curious who they have chosen to reward. Btw notokyc wagering contest has ended. Awaiting for the results and info how they going to choose the winner. Looks like easy money, as they choose 3 winners and there are only 7 participants.

Each participant must also comment on the pinned tweet. I don't know when the team will announce the winner, but so far, many participants have joined simply by commenting their wallet address and liking it.

Aside from that, events held at X usually attract a large number of participants, so if we join, our chances of winning are very small due to the large number of participants. However, it won't be a problem if we don't win because the rules are so simple. If we don't win this event, we can win in the next one, as long as we actively participate in each event.

Yes, the betting contest on this forum has ended. The $1k prize is certainly large, but there aren't many participants, so they can win this contest.

[Futurexxx]

.
If a casino wants to get KYC they should do it from the onset, especially from registration or maybe during depositing and it waiting till it is time to withdrawal which is always frustrating.

Truly it's sometimes frustrating, but as you have already said, most gamers have now come to terms that KYC is a must, in centralized casino, just that let the services of the casino be very good. If it's good and the customer support is very active in answering to the plight or challenges of gamers using the casino, doing KYC is not a problem.
Another important thing is stating it very clearly in the rules that KYC is a must, so that gamer will have it at the back of their mind that they will be doing KYC in this casino, so it doesn't matter if it is from the start or during withdrawal, let gamers be aware of it from the start.

[Lida93]

Snip.

But aside the government infiltration, there are lots of implications too towards the submission of KYC on casino platforms. I think not quite long ago one of the most reputable casinos here was attacked and hacked although not directly the casino but a third party provider that aided them in submission of data of customers and in the official notice I think lots of customers details were stolen from this third party provider.

I suppose you're referring to the data breach from Fast Track which was thought at first to affect only Shuffle casino users emails but it's actually an issue which affects all the casinos partnering with their service.

One thing about centralized platforms are that they are not entirely invulnerable, their security measures only adds a layer of resistance to hacks. With this understanding you know that the data you provide in a KYC demand is in a 50/50 situation in terms of exposure.

[Gentle_Soul]

I thought NoTOKYC is an actual online casino at first, anyways.

The link consists of few online casinos that doesn't require KYC before anyone can start gambling, thanks for the information but the problem is this list will go down in few years maybe, and that's because many no kYC casinos have started to ask for KYC verification, there is no way to evade this unless the casino is not popular and well successful yet.

Some times I am even thinking that No KYC is a marketing scheme to attract people, because people do love to gamble without any verification, but running the casino for long is going to be a problem when the regulators come for the casino, there will be nothing else the casino team can do than to proceed with verification or risk getting fined and charges.

My advice to everyone reading this is that casinos are not very far from forcing KYC verification on customers some days, enjoy these while they last.

It's not the casino's fault, it's just the way things are in this world, The government always wants a piece of every pie.

For me I don't really see the need for kyc especially during registration procedures I think it should be more of a compulsion when it has got to do with certain transactions that way kyc will not have to limit people from making use of a casino they would used
However there are places for kyc am not disputing that and I know know the relevance of it but registration process is a no no for m

[Hazink]

But aside the government infiltration, there are lots of implications too towards the submission of KYC on casino platforms. I think not quite long ago one of the most reputable casinos here was attacked and hacked although not directly the casino but a third party provider that aided them in submission of data of customers and in the official notice I think lots of customers details were stolen from this third party provider.

There is always a danger immediately you hand over your document to a third party. When you hold your document inside your house locked up, the chances of it getting leaked are leaked is very slim compared to when you photocopied it and submitted it for job applications. Any little mistake by where you submit it to it will all be on the street, what happens on the event with fast Track I don't know how deep that was, but it was said it only few customers' information that was affected aside from personal email and mobile number I don't think other data was accessed.

[Bushdark]

No KYC casino site is good but in most cases at the end KYC is still required when there is an issue. I am not disputing the fact that you can't operate without KYC but I am saying is that, at the beginning you might remove KYC to create impression and attract customers but at time goes when problems arise and can solve without KYC what will you do? You are not the first to operate this. We have seen it in other places as well. And from your explanation, the site performs multiple jobs at a time. One can play bet and also use it for exchange.

I don't think there is 100% no KYC casino because problem will always arise that could make the team to look for ways to resolve them buy asking players of some information that can be categorically be seen as KYC verification. In this case this might make players to feel like something is wrong with the casino team. Most money launders and fraudsters like to use non KYC casinos and companies where they can be less exposed to the public through any attempt of asking them to submit documents for KYC.

[MainIbem]

I don't think there is 100% no KYC casino because problem will always arise that could make the team to look for ways to resolve them buy asking players of some information that can be categorically be seen as KYC verification. In this case this might make players to feel like something is wrong with the casino team. Most money launders and fraudsters like to use non KYC casinos and companies where they can be less exposed to the public through any attempt of asking them to submit documents for KYC.

Well I'll agree to this statement after I've registered and confirm for myself but for now if what they claim is true then I makes lots of sense, I'm very big on privacy, even when it comes to crypto casino if this platform doesn't require kyc on the longrun like some do then I'll consider them good. Also, I think that if the issue is very severe like a case of money laundry then the casino have every right to request for KYC to save their own reputation of involving with fraudulent costumers.

[adultcrypto]

I don't think there is 100% no KYC casino because problem will always arise that could make the team to look for ways to resolve them buy asking players of some information that can be categorically be seen as KYC verification. In this case this might make players to feel like something is wrong with the casino team. Most money launders and fraudsters like to use non KYC casinos and companies where they can be less exposed to the public through any attempt of asking them to submit documents for KYC.

Well I'll agree to this statement after I've registered and confirm for myself but for now if what they claim is true then I makes lots of sense, I'm very big on privacy, even when it comes to crypto casino if this platform doesn't require kyc on the longrun like some do then I'll consider them good. Also, I think that if the issue is very severe like a case of money laundry then the casino have every right to request for KYC to save their own reputation of involving with fraudulent costumers.

Casino asking for KYC depend largely on the amount involved and the activities of the user. There is amount of money that a user will control in the casino and they will have no option that to be sure the money is from a legitimate source and not money from crime or illegal activities. Similarly, there is a way the user will operate in the casino that they will be forced to investigate through KYC. For instance, if a user is betting millions on small odd like 1.05 as I have seen in happen before, and such action is repeated several times, you will know that this is not normal so the casinos might be forced to take action. 

[Obari]

I don't think there is 100% no KYC casino because problem will always arise that could make the team to look for ways to resolve them buy asking players of some information that can be categorically be seen as KYC verification. In this case this might make players to feel like something is wrong with the casino team. Most money launders and fraudsters like to use non KYC casinos and companies where they can be less exposed to the public through any attempt of asking them to submit documents for KYC.

Well I'll agree to this statement after I've registered and confirm for myself but for now if what they claim is true then I makes lots of sense, I'm very big on privacy, even when it comes to crypto casino if this platform doesn't require kyc on the longrun like some do then I'll consider them good. Also, I think that if the issue is very severe like a case of money laundry then the casino have every right to request for KYC to save their own reputation of involving with fraudulent costumers.

Most times, the casino wouldn’t know that they money is a laundered money and as such they have exceptions to demand for KYC in cases like this and one thing is that, we players make things very difficult for these sites because same  we want privacy and strictly no KYC casino but same we also want guaranty and safety while gambling but the truth is that, for a casino to guaranty your safety is when they’re registered because if they fail in their end, you then have every reason to sue.

[Promocodeudo]

I don't think there is 100% no KYC casino because problem will always arise that could make the team to look for ways to resolve them buy asking players of some information that can be categorically be seen as KYC verification. In this case this might make players to feel like something is wrong with the casino team. Most money launders and fraudsters like to use non KYC casinos and companies where they can be less exposed to the public through any attempt of asking them to submit documents for KYC.

I think you're right where you say scammers or fraudsters love to use casinos without KYC because they love keeping everything to themselves, they don't like giving out information that would lead to being caught or tracked whichever, they feel that the only way they can prevent that from happening is to keep their identify secret,  I think this is one of the reason why most casino introduce KYC during withdrawal, earlier before now I was arguing the fact that if a casino is non KYC casino, they should maintain that decision but I have come to realize that despite that there shady casinos that will want capitalize on that excuse not release players winning, I also understand that some casinos so that for safety, casinos are regulated and i believe most of their decision is to on a safer side not to be victimize by the government if anything goes wrong.

[xLays]

Anyway, I’m also waiting for the results as I’m one of the participants. I only got 58 tickets. I’m curious how many tickets the other participants got since their wagers aren’t public or posted on that thread..

You have a good number of entries for this contest. Maybe I have the lowest number of entries for this contest. I got the opportunity to play at one casino only, and I didn't like that platform. That's why I had made a small deposit and lost it with a few hundred dollars wager. The website doesn't even show how much I have wagered until now.

The question is, among those 7 participants did NoToKYC actually make a profit or just break even for promotional purposes? I’m sure it’s mainly for promotion, but they could still make some profit through affiliate earnings.

I believe it wasn't a profitable contest for them. It isn't possible to generate revenue within a short time by running a contest like this. It would have been better for them if they occasionally gave updates with the number of tickets of each participant.

The winners have already been announced, along with the total number of tickets generated. If my estimate is correct, there were almost 3,000 tickets, which means around $300,000 was wagered.

If the casino gives 1% of the total wagers to NoToKYC, then they earned about $3,000 in profit. However, I don’t think online casino affiliates usually give that high of a percentage but if they do, then NoKYC definitely made some profit..

[Wakate]

Nowadays, cryptocurrency regulation is becoming stricter, and I believe that soon there will be no casinos that operate without KYC. I think that if a casino operates without KYC, it can be shut down at any time, and it would be very risky for players to play in such casinos, as they could be closed quickly and players would not have enough time to withdraw their money.

Government are sleeplessly doing all they can to deny us our privacy and that's why they always kick against anything that promotes the idea of decentralisation. The involvement of government into cryptocurrency wasn't to just make some profits through the system but to also make sure they infiltrate it with it's long arm of regulations, and just as you have rightly said, this posed a risk to customers of any complete decentralised platforms and even the platforms itself from abrupt shutdown.

Privacy should be important to us and we should not think that because you see the word no KYC then you are going to get full privacy. They have your IP address and other information that can be used to locate you even though you don't have to submit your information to them. Technology is advancing and casinos are equipping themselves with sophisticated tools to get you under their watchlist without you submitting any information about yourself if you are a mere suspect or threat to their operation.

[panjul07]

The winners have already been announced, along with the total number of tickets generated. If my estimate is correct, there were almost 3,000 tickets, which means around $300,000 was wagered.

If the casino gives 1% of the total wagers to NoToKYC, then they earned about $3,000 in profit. However, I don’t think online casino affiliates usually give that high of a percentage but if they do, then NoKYC definitely made some profit..

It is rare to see affiliate program that will give commission merely based on percentage of the wagered amount because it can be something huge and not profitable for the casino.
Usually commission is based on combination of HE, wagered and commission rate etc so I doubt that NoToKYC made profit from the contest.
They can repeat the contest but with better prize distribution since the winner is not based on who wager the most as it was a raffle, so better to have more winning places so more players will be attracted to come although for few tickets only.

[Zwei]

The winners have already been announced, along with the total number of tickets generated. If my estimate is correct, there were almost 3,000 tickets, which means around $300,000 was wagered.

If the casino gives 1% of the total wagers to NoToKYC, then they earned about $3,000 in profit. However, I don’t think online casino affiliates usually give that high of a percentage but if they do, then NoKYC definitely made some profit..

casinos don't give a % of wager volume, as far as i know, all serious affiliates are on revshare deals, which can go between 20% ~ 50%.
the wager amount doesn't matter at all, how much the players lost/won that matters. so we can't know for sure if they made a profit, broke even, or lost money.

[Odusko]

I don't think there is 100% no KYC casino because problem will always arise that could make the team to look for ways to resolve them buy asking players of some information that can be categorically be seen as KYC verification. In this case this might make players to feel like something is wrong with the casino team. Most money launders and fraudsters like to use non KYC casinos and companies where they can be less exposed to the public through any attempt of asking them to submit documents for KYC.

Well I'll agree to this statement after I've registered and confirm for myself but for now if what they claim is true then I makes lots of sense, I'm very big on privacy, even when it comes to crypto casino if this platform doesn't require kyc on the longrun like some do then I'll consider them good. Also, I think that if the issue is very severe like a case of money laundry then the casino have every right to request for KYC to save their own reputation of involving with fraudulent costumers.

Most times, the casino wouldn’t know that they money is a laundered money and as such they have exceptions to demand for KYC in cases like this and one thing is that, we players make things very difficult for these sites because same  we want privacy and strictly no KYC casino but same we also want guaranty and safety while gambling but the truth is that, for a casino to guaranty your safety is when they’re registered because if they fail in their end, you then have every reason to sue.

Let us not misunderstood this statement from casinos that says no kyc, if i am not mistaken what their mean is that you may not require kyc at the point of account creation, but definitely if there is need for you to verify your account along the line then you will have to do so, so some limits are set that the kyc demands will be triggered up for the customers.

[khaled0111]

Company must be responsible for the data of its uses and keep it in a safe place that nobody will be able get such information.

I agree with this, but unfortunately, this is not what is really happening. Almost all casinos and other service providers claim that they take users’ privacy seriously and that their data are safe with them, but we hear almost every day about some of these services getting hacked and, guess what? the first things that get leaked are users’ personal information and documents.

Let us not misunderstood this statement from casinos that says no kyc, if i am not mistaken what their mean is that you may not require kyc at the point of account creation

No, if they claim they are a no-kyc casino, then they are not supposed to ask you to pass kyc at any point (not only upon registration), unless they are forced to do so (likd when they suspect you are cheating or something like that).

[Odusko]

No, if they claim they are a no-kyc casino, then they are not supposed to ask you to pass kyc at any point (not only upon registration), unless they are forced to do so (likd when they suspect you are cheating or something like that).

Exactly the point, casino ask for KYC for various reasons that range from
: Suspicious activities on the casino
: passing the minimum deposit limits for no KYC accounts
Etc, this are the main reasons why casino that pronounce no KYC can ask for KYC at some point and can be justifiable.

[Futurexxx]

This is a good reason why we should check the platform or casino we want to use because some companies are very bad at keeping logs and customers data. There support or core team could be stupid enough to mishandle users info getting leaked to the public or to the hands of people that can use it to haunt innocent users. Caution should be applicable when selecting online platforms to use for our various activities.

Wakate you have spoken well, and I agree to all that you said here but am just curious to know what and what that we need to look out for, for we to be sure that this or that casino can secure our information?
Where should we look and be aware that our information is not safe with this casino?
Because if something like that ever took place behind the scene, we are not going to be aware unless they speak of it publicly or make an announcement, but if their is a way we can know if a casino can secure our information or not, it would be very good.