🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Mahdirakib]

they are just going to ignore this like they always do.
the only way i can think of that would make them stop and listen is if mods take action beyond just deleting the spam, or if @NoToKYC gets red tagged, but i'm not sure about that.

Yep, OP ignored what I have pointed out here. And the post bumpers are still active for them. Moderators don't take any strict steps against those post bumpers except deleting the reported posts. Forum doesn't have any strict rules to ban such users. Also, it may not be ideal to leave a negative feedback on OP's account for this reason.

Fantastic! Running a signature campaign is not that expensive, there are signature campaign managers that can provide affordable campaign for the team which is not going to cost much fund. ~

For a casino directory, running contest or promotion with deposit and wager requirements will be more positive than running a signature campaign. They will directly generate revenue for the deposit, wager or loses of the users who join any casino through their affiliate link to participate in such contest. FYI, NoToKYC had run a signature campaign for 4 weeks, and it has ended recently.

[Wakate]

~Snipped~

For a casino directory, running contest or promotion with deposit and wager requirements will be more positive than running a signature campaign. They will directly generate revenue for the deposit, wager or loses of the users who join any casino through their affiliate link to participate in such contest. FYI, NoToKYC had run a signature campaign for 4 weeks, and it has ended recently.

For the No KYC casino to have run a signature campaign for few weeks, it shows that they had made and attempt to join hundreds of casinos here that are promoting their brands and maybe the turnout was not impressive or the budget they had was insufficient to run the campaign for more weeks.

Your suggestion about running a contest just like many casinos like Razed, Betpanda, Whales had been doing is a great idea and that will bring more users to their platform.

[TopTort777]

I am not so sure that competition would run more users. Platform name would be spotter, no doubt in that, but there were not so many participants in competition. Besides they compete as individuals; they dont share results or we cant observe them. Their performance is not noticed by anyone. Signature campaign with more participants would be a better solution imho. Like vave does, they pay little, ask to post only 10 posts. If notokyc would have used their promotion balance in same way (more unique posters on the forum), they could reach more audience.

[Obari]

Most times, the casino wouldn’t know that they money is a laundered money and as such they have exceptions to demand for KYC in cases like this and one thing is that, we players make things very difficult for these sites because same  we want privacy and strictly no KYC casino but same we also want guaranty and safety while gambling but the truth is that, for a casino to guaranty your safety is when they’re registered because if they fail in their end, you then have every reason to sue.

It is not the task of casino to check if money is laundered. The task of casino is to know who plays in it and to follow KYC policy.
The task of state authorities is to check if money is laundered or not.

Every business owner should be responsible for people who use their services and because of that, casinos can ask for KYC but the problem is that, if they have to ask for KYC, then they should come out plain and not make it seem like they are tricking their players.
One of t he major reason casinos ask for KYC is to know their customers and make sure they can access a player in case there is an issue with their funds.

I agree with you that, if a site would be needing a KYC then they should make it very obvious and not tying to make it seems like  they wouldn’t be needing only to demand for it during withdrawals.
I enjoy sincerity in everything i do and I see you guys going very far but a little advise, always try to listen to what your players have to say and act positively on the .
Goodluck

[Futurexxx]

Yea signature campaign will be nice, it will really help the brand for further visibility, this will make their banner to be seen in many boards where their signature is visible but the number of participants is another thing to look at, yea they can also consider running a signature with a reduced budget, let not also forget that having more participants in a campaign help casino and non casino brands, for instance we don't expect a casino that has few participants to get get their goals as quick as other one that has more participants will do because different participants have boards they frequent and it means that the signature of such the casino will be shown in those board making it easy for every visitor here to notice them very fast irrespective of the board those visitors navigate through, although they can start from the little they can.

I necessarily don't think signature campaign will be a good idea for now, especially if the casino is not that financially bouyant enough, what I sees as a better options is doing a review campaign, so that we can get a direct feedback on how their services are from forum users, and with what those that does the review said, we can confidently utilize the casino with more clarity on what to expect while gambling with the casino.
Though the idea of signature campaign is not a bad one, but it's just too early for that, they should first of all put their house in order, by winning the heart of the community, before advertising their brand through signature campaign.

[SuperBitMan]

Most times, the casino wouldn’t know that they money is a laundered money and as such they have exceptions to demand for KYC in cases like this and one thing is that, we players make things very difficult for these sites because same  we want privacy and strictly no KYC casino but same we also want guaranty and safety while gambling but the truth is that, for a casino to guaranty your safety is when they’re registered because if they fail in their end, you then have every reason to sue.

It is not the task of casino to check if money is laundered. The task of casino is to know who plays in it and to follow KYC policy.
The task of state authorities is to check if money is laundered or not.

Every business owner should be responsible for people who use their services and because of that, casinos can ask for KYC but the problem is that, if they have to ask for KYC, then they should come out plain and not make it seem like they are tricking their players.
One of t he major reason casinos ask for KYC is to know their customers and make sure they can access a player in case there is an issue with their funds.

I agree with you that, if a site would be needing a KYC then they should make it very obvious and not tying to make it seems like  they wouldn’t be needing only to demand for it during withdrawals.
I enjoy sincerity in everything i do and I see you guys going very far but a little advise, always try to listen to what your players have to say and act positively on the .
Goodluck

You are right Obari, some casinos will not tell you that they need kyc they will act as if they don't want kyc until you want to withdraw they will now request for the kyc, it has happened to me before I registered for a casino no kyc needed, when I even deposited they never requested for kyc however when I won some money in the casino I decided to withdraw that was when they requested for kyc I was very unhappy however I decided to do the kyc because I needed to withdraw my money after the kyc and I successful withdraw my money i stopped using the casino, I really love casinos that are very sincere and honest at the beginning it's create a good relationship between them and their customers, any casino that is not honest from the beginning usually have problem and they lose customers so if a kyc is needed in any casino it should be stated clearly that a kyc is needed and it should be done during registration.

[Agbe]

Snip

Usually during registrations casinos inform about different bonuses and free spins but not inform about KYC procedures.
Players know about the obligatory KYC procedures only when they start to withdraw money.

The reason for this is simple,to avoid fraud because anyone can use your phone and withdraw money. So KYC is even in the best interest of the customers not just the casino. again it's global best practice for casinos to know the identity of their customers so whether there is no KYC in the initial stages of registration gambler's should know that KYC is needed by most casinos for withdrawals to be successful.

[Mr Reporter]

Snip

Usually during registrations casinos inform about different bonuses and free spins but not inform about KYC procedures.
Players know about the obligatory KYC procedures only when they start to withdraw money.

The reason for this is simple,to avoid fraud because anyone can use your phone and withdraw money. So KYC is even in the best interest of the customers not just the casino. again it's global best practice for casinos to know the identity of their customers so whether there is no KYC in the initial stages of registration gambler's should know that KYC is needed by most casinos for withdrawals to be successful.

Know Your Customer) is indeed a global best practice, and it's not just about casinos protecting themselves, but also about safeguarding customers' interests simple that what most casinos failed to understand.
Having to be  verified as a customers' identities, casinos can prevent fraud, money laundering, and other illicit activities. It's a win-win situation.

Well to me I most like to deal with casino operators that are games for kyc because I believe it’s somehow no to be  transparent one before accepting it

[Rockson1]

The reason for this is simple,to avoid fraud because anyone can use your phone and withdraw money. So KYC is even in the best interest of the customers not just the casino. again it's global best practice for casinos to know the identity of their customers so whether there is no KYC in the initial stages of registration gambler's should know that KYC is needed by most casinos for withdrawals to be successful.

KYC benefits both the customers and the casino itself, a situation where a launder money is been traced to a customers account, it is very easy to identify such customer if the customer did his or her KYC in the casino so the casino will be on a safer side here because they government can easily track the user with his identify shown in the casino platform so everything becomes easy for the casino without being stressed for any reason, the area you pointed out is where it benefits the customer so both parties are really beneficiary to this.

[Lida93]

Snip

Last time I check casino's can be taking to court unless the said gambler were too reluctant to sue them. Although most persons have complained on how nothing was done after suing a casino. I think, last year someone made that complain, maybe here or in another discussion outside the forum. But the thing is, these casinos have the money to settle any court case. They bribe their way out whenever they are being taking to court. So most gamblers dont care anymore taking them to court.

Oh yes, as an entity it can sue or be sued but for a gambler to sue a casino he must have substantial evidence and materials available to push for his claims but most times it's not about the evidence the brings about the reluctance, it could be they're just scared of spending money in court cases

The reason for this is simple,to avoid fraud because anyone can use your phone and withdraw money. So KYC is even in the best interest of the customers not just the casino...

How can anyone pick up your phone and just gain access into your account without using your password, except it's a hack, otherwise the user may have carelessly exposed his password to a third party. KYC isn't something all users are pleased to do, some people prefers keeping their identity private and wouldn't see KYC as something in their best interest.

[Youngrebel]

Most times, the casino wouldn’t know that they money is a laundered money and as such they have exceptions to demand for KYC in cases like this and one thing is that, we players make things very difficult for these sites because same  we want privacy and strictly no KYC casino but same we also want guaranty and safety while gambling but the truth is that, for a casino to guaranty your safety is when they’re registered because if they fail in their end, you then have every reason to sue.

It is not the task of casino to check if money is laundered. The task of casino is to know who plays in it and to follow KYC policy.
The task of state authorities is to check if money is laundered or not.

Every business owner should be responsible for people who use their services and because of that, casinos can ask for KYC but the problem is that, if they have to ask for KYC, then they should come out plain and not make it seem like they are tricking their players.
One of t he major reason casinos ask for KYC is to know their customers and make sure they can access a player in case there is an issue with their funds.

I agree with you that, if a site would be needing a KYC then they should make it very obvious and not tying to make it seems like  they wouldn’t be needing only to demand for it during withdrawals.
I enjoy sincerity in everything i do and I see you guys going very far but a little advise, always try to listen to what your players have to say and act positively on the .
Goodluck

You are right Obari, some casinos will not tell you that they need kyc they will act as if they don't want kyc until you want to withdraw they will now request for the kyc, it has happened to me before I registered for a casino no kyc needed, when I even deposited they never requested for kyc however when I won some money in the casino I decided to withdraw that was when they requested for kyc I was very unhappy however I decided to do the kyc because I needed to withdraw my money after the kyc and I successful withdraw my money i stopped using the casino, I really love casinos that are very sincere and honest at the beginning it's create a good relationship between them and their customers, any casino that is not honest from the beginning usually have problem and they lose customers so if a kyc is needed in any casino it should be stated clearly that a kyc is needed and it should be done during registration.

I don't really like that behavior from casinos, if they want to ask for KYC, let them ask at the beginning to f before a gambler deposit funds and not when you win big amount and want to withdraw them frustration just came up to verify the account. And for that they would uphold the account until the verification process is accepted. Why can't they do it before depositing so that everything would be working fine for the Person to withdraw. This is one thing I like about Centralized Exchange. They asked KYC after the registration so you can trade big volume of cryptocurrency.
Casinos can do something like that, they can ask clients to do KYC before depositing and playing games. So when they wins, it will be smooth withdrawal and no obstruction again.

[GiftedMAN]

KYC benefits both the customers and the casino itself, a situation where a launder money is been traced to a customers account, it is very easy to identify such customer if the customer did his or her KYC in the casino so the casino will be on a safer side here because they government can easily track the user with his identify shown in the casino platform so everything becomes easy for the casino without being stressed for any reason, the area you pointed out is where it benefits the customer so both parties are really beneficiary to this.

The essence of casinos asking customers to do their KYC is not all about getting the identity of the customers faster in the case of money laundering your KYC also helps in the protection of your money in the casinos, yes KYC cdn be used to trace a customer in the case of a fraudulent activities but in the case of a customer losing his or her money if it is in a casino where KYC is required before withdrawal a third party cen not have access to the account of another person so yeah the issue of KYC is important to both the casinos and the customer in different ways.

[Promocodeudo]

I don't really like that behavior from casinos, if they want to ask for KYC, let them ask at the beginning to f before a gambler deposit funds and not when you win big amount and want to withdraw them frustration just came up to verify the account. And for that they would uphold the account until the verification process is accepted. Why can't they do it before depositing so that everything would be working fine for the Person to withdraw. This is one thing I like about Centralized Exchange. They asked KYC after the registration so you can trade big volume of cryptocurrency.
Casinos can do something like that, they can ask clients to do KYC before depositing and playing games. So when they wins, it will be smooth withdrawal and no obstruction again.

I was meant to know that since these casino are regulated, there are some changes that might come later especially when big win is involved, I believe you understand that nothing is constant although I understand your worry and I also think that's how things are supposed to be but since some casinos don't have any option than to keep to keep to the directives of the authority that be what can we do, personally am not even ok with any casino that say no KYC but later come with the idea because of whatever reason, the thing is if the KYC introduction by the any of those casinos just introduce on the ground of transparency and security of individual customer funds in their Casiono, I think there's nothing wrong with that but if it a means to defraud the customers their winning withdrawal, that's where it can be frowned at.

[TopTort777]

I don't really like that behavior from casinos, if they want to ask for KYC, let them ask at the beginning to f before a gambler deposit funds and not when you win big amount and want to withdraw them frustration just came up to verify the account. And for that they would uphold the account until the verification process is accepted. Why can't they do it before depositing so that everything would be working fine for the Person to withdraw. This is one thing I like about Centralized Exchange. They asked KYC after the registration so you can trade big volume of cryptocurrency.
Casinos can do something like that, they can ask clients to do KYC before depositing and playing games. So when they wins, it will be smooth withdrawal and no obstruction again.

If you dont like surprises like unexpected request to pass KYC, then why dont you pass it yourself after registration? What you suggest looks like a forced action. What casino have right now is an opportunity to pass KYC at free will. Every casino in profile have verification option that contains several steps to pass. Everyone are welcomed to start their gambling experience from that, instead of rushing to make a deposit.

[TopTort777]

You did not get it. Dude told that casino should force you to pass KYC before you even make a deposit, but I have told him that any gambler can go to options and start passing KYC, without waiting for casino to ask to do that. He suggested casino to make that as an obligatory, I told him that any gambler can make this as a rule or habit before playing in new casino to avoid surprises and pauses in money management.

[Rating Place]

Even if you do KYC upfront before withdrawing they may ask for more information such as a video selfie.

[Bushdark]

Even if you do KYC upfront before withdrawing they may ask for more information such as a video selfie.

I don't know much about the nokyc casino but just like every other casinos I have used, these people can frustrate the hell out of your gentle spirit. Few casinos that are KYC noted I used in the past almost ask me to send the passport of my aged granny before they can confirm my verification. I had to stop half and leave my fund their to have a breathing space. I know many casinos especially the good ones would never indulge in such kind of practices.

[GiftedMAN]

Even if you do KYC upfront before withdrawing they may ask for more information such as a video selfie.

I don't know much about the nokyc casino but just like every other casinos I have used, these people can frustrate the hell out of your gentle spirit. Few casinos that are KYC noted I used in the past almost ask me to send the passport of my aged granny before they can confirm my verification. I had to stop half and leave my fund their to have a breathing space. I know many casinos especially the good ones would never indulge in such kind of practices.

The nkyc is nothing new just that I don't know how long it takes for them to start requesting for things that may get you pissed off it may not start when you are making deposits but if you attempt to make withdrawals after winning you will start getting funny informations that you may not be cool with.

For the casinos that require KYC, some of their requirements are way simple they just request for your Identity which will be listed and you choose the one that is suitable for you I haven't encountered a casino requesting for the passport of a third party that's wrong the best thing to do is to avoid such casino but cause going to look for the passport of your granny sounds funny.

[EpicCharles]

You did not get it. Dude told that casino should force you to pass KYC before you even make a deposit, but I have told him that any gambler can go to options and start passing KYC, without waiting for casino to ask to do that. He suggested casino to make that as an obligatory, I told him that any gambler can make this as a rule or habit before playing in new casino to avoid surprises and pauses in money management.

TBH this makes a lot of sense. An experienced gambler will be aware of the regulated casinos asking for KYC and can themself make the decision of when to complete them. Moreover, if you are a high-stakes gambler, you might be double motivated to play only in the regulated casinos asking for KYC, to avoid excessive risk of putting your money into completely dark and anonymous non-kyc ones. At least in the regulated ones, you and your lawyers have a chance of getting your money back from the regulator vs. 100% guaranteed you will never see funds again if scammed on a non-kyc one.

[Gentle_Soul]

Is this some kind of movement (starting from your username to the way you post, you sound like it)? I think you should stick with the "no KYC" narrative because if you say "we prioritize low" KYC thing that means that still have KYC in it and that's perfectly not align to your mission. Of course, these days that's a rare case unless you stumble upon a dApp casino which is truly decentralized.

Yeah you are kind of correct I think it should be straight forward if it's kyc let them it be clear if it's not let it be clear as well .minimal kyc does not sound really well to me ok come to talk of it at what point will the kyc procedure get to and stop and at what point will it continue it should either be kyc or no kyc.