🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Eternad]

You are right, I always see some gamblers complaining about a casino that requires kyc why not go for the ones that those not require kyc than for you to be complaining always, just like you said that those casino company see it as there business and they will do everything possible to make sure there casino is okay and if you don't like that policy they set is better you just look for another one so you won't have issues in the future with them.
Yeah some set of people see kyc as being stressful but me I don't see it as really that stressful, one thing we should understand is that a casino that requires kyc do that so they can fight some scam issues easily, if you check you will discover that those casino that usually don't require kyc are always prone to scam.
I will always advise that you go for what ever you want if you like casinos without KYC go for it and if you don't then don't go for it.

Because they are trying their luck not get busted since they typically from restricted country or doesn’t want to send their KYC info on a casino.

Actually, the rise of no KYC casino is just happened recently since most of the licensed casino doesn’t emphasize the no KYC terms unlike the casino listed on this website that offers no KYC.

[Promocodeudo]

Can the No KYC Casinos also decide to change their terms and request for KYC when you have already established a business with them by gambling on their site because you don't want to reveal your identity?

Mate our this question so that we can deliberate more on it, I think non KYC casinos can actually ask for KYC even when they didn't require that earlier, I didn't get to to know this earlier but I later got to know this and there are reasons why Non KYC casinos can come up with these changes, these casinos are regulated and there are things that can also put them into trouble since the can't do everything on their own, for them to be on a safer side and for the safe of their customers, they can introduce KYC if they suspect any shady thing stuff or when there's a huge win, let's not forget that  casinos will continue to review their terms and conditions as far as they see it as a way to increase security in their platform and th growth of their business which is their priority.

[Woodie]

Can the No KYC Casinos also decide to change their terms and request for KYC when you have already established a business with them by gambling on their site because you don't want to reveal your identity?

Mate our this question so that we can deliberate more on it, I think non KYC casinos can actually ask for KYC even when they didn't require that earlier, I didn't get to to know this earlier but I later got to know this and there are reasons why Non KYC casinos can come up with these changes, these casinos are regulated and there are things that can also put them into trouble since the can't do everything on their own, for them to be on a safer side and for the safe of their customers, they can introduce KYC if they suspect any shady thing stuff or when there's a huge win, let's not forget that  casinos will continue to review their terms and conditions as far as they see it as a way to increase security in their platform and th growth of their business which is their priority.

True!

The casinos might be Non KYC but not everything is under their control, let's take the casino game providers for instance, they could flag a player's play style and before you know it funds could be held and trigger the dreaded KYC and if the money means something to you then most likely you will do the KYC in exchange for the release of your held funds  

But the No KYC casino's do exist just to put it out there.

[Agbe]

From what I understand about KYC and Casinos is that, there is a regulatory laws that guides these Casinos and they have to abide by those rules.Even though I Casino may not require KYC from you at the beginning they may eventually dose if you win a Large some of money and wants to withdraw. This is because the sake of transparency in the part of the Casino and following regulatory laws so that the Casino will not be seen as a tool of siphoning money. But why will anyone Gambling be afraid of doing KYC at the first place.

[ginsan]

From what I understand about KYC and Casinos is that, there is a regulatory laws that guides these Casinos and they have to abide by those rules.Even though I Casino may not require KYC from you at the beginning they may eventually dose if you win a Large some of money and wants to withdraw. This is because the sake of transparency in the part of the Casino and following regulatory laws so that the Casino will not be seen as a tool of siphoning money. But why will anyone Gambling be afraid of doing KYC at the first place.

However, with your argument, it can be assumed that casinos that advertise that they do not require KYC are frauds if in the end they still have to do KYC to withdraw money won at the casino, because they have lied to their customers by advertising KYC-free on their platform.

In previous years before KYC was made mandatory by the government it was possible to gamble without KYC depositing and withdrawing any amount, but due to the many abuses of this freedom feature, the government had to pressure the casino industry to make KYC mandatory in order to detect transactions that were harmful to the government.

They are not afraid but do not want to do KYC, do not want their data to be held by others such as entering into casino data, people with anonymous types like always exist, so it's not because they are afraid but because they don't want to, so of course they will choose a casino that does not require KYC.

[Agbamoni]

Mate our this question so that we can deliberate more on it, I think non KYC casinos can actually ask for KYC even when they didn't require that earlier, I didn't get to to know this earlier but I later got to know this and there are reasons why Non KYC casinos can come up with these changes, these casinos are regulated and there are things that can also put them into trouble since the can't do everything on their own, for them to be on a safer side and for the safe of their customers, they can introduce KYC if they suspect any shady thing stuff or when there's a huge win, let's not forget that  casinos will continue to review their terms and conditions as far as they see it as a way to increase security in their platform and th growth of their business which is their priority.

The reason has to be serious, if not you are not allowed to pass a KYC in a non-KYC casino. It is different if they stated in their Tos that based on certain reasons you might be asked for KYC but if they do not add that in their Tos then they are going against their own words. I like the way some CEX do it. You can use their exchange without KYC but when you want to make a huge deposit/withrawal you need to reach a level which requires KYC. Casino should adopt this method.

[Eternad]

In previous years before KYC was made mandatory by the government it was possible to gamble without KYC depositing and withdrawing any amount, but due to the many abuses of this freedom feature, the government had to pressure the casino industry to make KYC mandatory in order to detect transactions that were harmful to the government.

They are not afraid but do not want to do KYC, do not want their data to be held by others such as entering into casino data, people with anonymous types like always exist, so it's not because they are afraid but because they don't want to, so of course they will choose a casino that does not require KYC.

Just a few correction on this statement, casino seek license to operate legally since government is already acknowledging crypto as currency with value unlike before that it was on grey area which KYC is still doesn’t applied.

Due to popularity of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency it becomes a mandatory for the government to regulate since it’s considered already a money not because user abused the use casino.

Before, license from Curacao is still not popular even on big casino but due to regulatory pressure it became a must for online casino operators.

[Mr Reporter]

In previous years before KYC was made mandatory by the government it was possible to gamble without KYC depositing and withdrawing any amount, but due to the many abuses of this freedom feature, the government had to pressure the casino industry to make KYC mandatory in order to detect transactions that were harmful to the government.

They are not afraid but do not want to do KYC, do not want their data to be held by others such as entering into casino data, people with anonymous types like always exist, so it's not because they are afraid but because they don't want to, so of course they will choose a casino that does not require KYC.

Just a few correction on this statement, casino seek license to operate legally since government is already acknowledging crypto as currency with value unlike before that it was on grey area which KYC is still doesn’t applied.

Due to popularity of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency it becomes a mandatory for the government to regulate since it’s considered already a money not because user abused the use casino.

Before, license from Curacao is still not popular even on big casino but due to regulatory pressure it became a must for online casino operators.

Well I think that is actually a very solid and well-reasoned point. if a casino advertises itself as non-kyc then it shouldn’t suddenly demand verification unless that condition is clearly mentioned in its Terms of Service.
 Well from the suggestion of a tiered approach, where users can use the casino without kyc for smaller transactions, but need to complete kyc for larger transactions, similar to some centralized exchanges (CEX). This way, users know what to expect and can choose accordingly.

[adultcrypto]

Every time the situation can change, Many people now do not want to pass kyc in casino because they not sure that their personal data are kept in a safe place.
Nobody knows how personal data of users will be used.

This is my biggest fears because we cannot completely trust people with our information which is like putting ourselves at big risk. Even some platform will promise that they will not store those information safely yet we end up seeing big compromises in personal information and the flimsy excuse they usually come up with is just change of management. I have seen it happen where a platform that leaked people KYC data claim it was due to change of management, a very poor excuse.

[Agbe]

Snip

This is my biggest fears because we cannot completely trust people with our information which is like putting ourselves at big risk. Even some platform will promise that they will not store those information safely yet we end up seeing big compromises in personal information and the flimsy excuse they usually come up with is just change of management. I have seen it happen where a platform that leaked people KYC data claim it was due to change of management, a very poor excuse.

This is one big issue of concern in this twenty first trusting your personal and confidential information with people all in the name of KYC is something that is of concern. Because over time we have come to the realization that personal information has been leaked and stolen from sites. People should be careful of the platforms that they upload their personal information to especially Casinos because there have been Casinos who have been found to run away with the money from their customers if a Casino can run away with the monies of their customers how about sensitive information that are stored on their systems.

[GiftedMAN]

Every time the situation can change, Many people now do not want to pass kyc in casino because they not sure that their personal data are kept in a safe place.
Nobody knows how personal data of users will be used.

This is my biggest fears because we cannot completely trust people with our information which is like putting ourselves at big risk. Even some platform will promise that they will not store those information safely yet we end up seeing big compromises in personal information and the flimsy excuse they usually come up with is just change of management. I have seen it happen where a platform that leaked people KYC data claim it was due to change of management, a very poor excuse.

If Casinos are not to be trusted why then do we keep supporting them by gambling when the ones that started with no KYC sometimes end up asking for KYC during withdrawals, is it not better the issue is addressed and the Casinos are made to sign some legal documents so that they will not reveal the informations or their customers? I think the issue of privacy will no longer be achieved if the casinos keeps revealing the information of their customers it is better it is addressed so that people will be sure that their informations are not out.

[Eternad]

In previous years before KYC was made mandatory by the government it was possible to gamble without KYC depositing and withdrawing any amount, but due to the many abuses of this freedom feature, the government had to pressure the casino industry to make KYC mandatory in order to detect transactions that were harmful to the government.

They are not afraid but do not want to do KYC, do not want their data to be held by others such as entering into casino data, people with anonymous types like always exist, so it's not because they are afraid but because they don't want to, so of course they will choose a casino that does not require KYC.

Just a few correction on this statement, casino seek license to operate legally since government is already acknowledging crypto as currency with value unlike before that it was on grey area which KYC is still doesn’t applied.

Due to popularity of Bitcoin and cryptocurrency it becomes a mandatory for the government to regulate since it’s considered already a money not because user abused the use casino.

Before, license from Curacao is still not popular even on big casino but due to regulatory pressure it became a must for online casino operators.

Well I think that is actually a very solid and well-reasoned point. if a casino advertises itself as non-kyc then it shouldn’t suddenly demand verification unless that condition is clearly mentioned in its Terms of Service.
 Well from the suggestion of a tiered approach, where users can use the casino without kyc for smaller transactions, but need to complete kyc for larger transactions, similar to some centralized exchanges (CEX). This way, users know what to expect and can choose accordingly.

I don’t check thoroughly on the casino listed on this website as No KYC casino but AFAIK they advertised it as no KYC because they will not mandatory required you to complete it.

But there’s always some instances that a casino like this will requires you to complete such as when your casino account is under investigation due to possible abused of their bonuses which is completely fair because the user is violating the ToS.

[Promocodeudo]

If Casinos are not to be trusted why then do we keep supporting them by gambling when the ones that started with no KYC sometimes end up asking for KYC during withdrawals, is it not better the issue is addressed and the Casinos are made to sign some legal documents so that they will not reveal the informations or their customers? I think the issue of privacy will no longer be achieved if the casinos keeps revealing the information of their customers it is better it is addressed so that people will be sure that their informations are not out.

In terms of lack of trust or mistrust, that's human thing and some gambling firm can not be exempted from this, realistically, I don't think it will be possible for casinos to agree to sign any legal documents that will prevent them from giving out their customers details to anyone as you said, there are things we shouldn't expect to happen, let's look at the other side of such agreement if casinos are to sign this which I know they won't agree to that, what if a player is been found wanting in the area of money laundering or any other financial crime and been traced to any of theses casinos, don't you think the casino that's involved will rope themselves in  if there's a legal agreement binding them and their customers, so what do we expect at this point? The question now is, can any casino decline the request of government when they are been asked for the details of customer under the investigation of financial crimes? To me I don't think any casino can withstand the pressure of the government, don't get me wrong, is not as if am saying is right for them to reveal the privacy of their customers to anyone but sometimes the power that be can compel them to do otherwise, I hope you understand my point.

[gunhell16]

I've noticed that many folks don't really like KYC cause of how stressful the process could be so the best approach for such people is to patronise the ones that doesn't support KYC, it's as simple as that, but in a case where a gambler decides to patronise the ones that require KYC then they should prepare themselves to be kyced at any point the casino find their account suspicious or any other reasons in their policy.

The thing is, most casinos reserve the right to request KYC whenever they want. That's also true for most of the ones claiming not to require identity verification. If you read their Terms & Conditions, you will realize that they are the opposite of what they claim. The number of true no-KYC casinos is very limited, and it will become even more limited in the future because privacy and anonymity will constantly be attacked.

you are very correct gambling platforms has the right to ask for KYC at any given time, so for that reason gambler's have to ready to provide their their KYC when the need's arises, although those gambling platforms that normally request for KYC, especially when withdrawal is about to be initiated do that for security reasons which I also see it as a good initiative, but the problem am having with some gambling platforms is that they will come to us saying that they are KYC free why they are not, and when you go dip down you will just discover that they just wrote those shits on the platforms or during their advertising just to attract customers because they know people like privacy and  they will prefer to gamble on the platforms that will offer them that privacy that they want, which doesn't seat well with me, because they're deceiving people just get them to come gamble on their platforms very bad, gambling platforms should learn to say the truth.

We know that if an online casino is subject to government regulation, they will naturally comply with whatever the government requires of them. Since they are under regulation, it’s not surprising that they ask for KYC (Know Your Customer) information from their users, as they are legitimate and legal casinos.

They do this for security purposes as well. And besides, it’s up to us whether we follow their rules or not. They’re not forcing their casino players to comply,
so it ultimately comes down to our own decision.

[Gentle_Soul]

Hi, i visited your site and and skimmed the casinos you are claiming to have no kyc. Quotes i am adding next to Casino names are directly from these sites.

-SNIP

Hello,
all KYC levels are determined together with the casino teams.
Licensed casinos have to include kyc terms to comply with the license laws, this does not mean they will do KYC!
The KYC levels are defined if KYC is needed and when.

So does it mean that the kyc can be done only required and at some points because I feel like since like you said it has to be attached to comply with the kyc terms then it can be there but not mandatory except for some functions, if that be the case then I think it's a brilliant one but including in the first initial registration is actually unnecessary

[Rating Place]

I think it's false advertising and I'm suspicious of the casinos advertising no KYC and then asking for KYC upon withdrawal. If they lie on this, what else will they lie to us?

[Zwei]

I think it's false advertising and I'm suspicious of the casinos advertising no KYC and then asking for KYC upon withdrawal. If they lie on this, what else will they lie to us?

they are also lying about the exolix affiliate exchange widget they have on the exchange tab, which they advertise as "Swap Anytime. No KYC Required!" which is an outright lie.
not to mention the dumb shill accounts that try to keep the thread bumped, they seem to have died now, but there are still a few popping now and then like these two:

So does it mean that the kyc can be done only required and at some points because I feel like since like you said it has to be attached to comply with the kyc terms then it can be there but not mandatory except for some functions, if that be the case then I think it's a brilliant one but including in the first initial registration is actually unnecessary

Also it is necessary to remember that everytime the legislation or kyc procedures may change and it will be necessary to pass kyc procedures in casino.

[Wakate]

I think it's false advertising and I'm suspicious of the casinos advertising no KYC and then asking for KYC upon withdrawal. If they lie on this, what else will they lie to us?

It would not make any sense of a casino that is KYC claim to be no KYC. This would be the highest deceit I've ever seen if what you have written is true and I am yet to get clarity on this your claim. Most of the casinos that are in this community are KYC casinos and I don't see any big deal to seeing more KYC casinos in this forum. It would be sad for a casino that continues to ask their players for their credentials to be claiming something different. I also know their are semi KYC casinos that will not ask you for complex verification.

[mitchr4]

I think it's false advertising and I'm suspicious of the casinos advertising no KYC and then asking for KYC upon withdrawal. If they lie on this, what else will they lie to us?

It would not make any sense of a casino that is KYC claim to be no KYC. This would be the highest deceit I've ever seen if what you have written is true and I am yet to get clarity on this your claim. Most of the casinos that are in this community are KYC casinos and I don't see any big deal to seeing more KYC casinos in this forum. It would be sad for a casino that continues to ask their players for their credentials to be claiming something different. I also know their are semi KYC casinos that will not ask you for complex verification.

Saying No KYC but then asking for verification during withdrawals could be a potential scam. If they plan to ask for KYC later, they should clearly say it from the start.
Players choose this casino because they expect privacy, so hiding such requirements only makes people lose trust.

[Wakate]

Saying No KYC but then asking for verification during withdrawals could be a potential scam. If they plan to ask for KYC later, they should clearly say it from the start.
Players choose this casino because they expect privacy, so hiding such requirements only makes people lose trust.

I have seen casinos that started adding no KYC to their features to attract players but when they started getting more traffic, the team started asking users for KYC verification which lead to confusion. It will be better to come out plain establishing a conducive atmosphere with players so that people will not get misleaded by the word no KYC.
I am beginning to think that this word "No KYC" might be just a name that has nothing to do with future verification as users.