🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Odusko]

I think it's false advertising and I'm suspicious of the casinos advertising no KYC and then asking for KYC upon withdrawal. If they lie on this, what else will they lie to us?

It would not make any sense of a casino that is KYC claim to be no KYC. This would be the highest deceit I've ever seen if what you have written is true and I am yet to get clarity on this your claim. Most of the casinos that are in this community are KYC casinos and I don't see any big deal to seeing more KYC casinos in this forum. It would be sad for a casino that continues to ask their players for their credentials to be claiming something different. I also know their are semi KYC casinos that will not ask you for complex verification.

Those no kyc statements by some casinos are just a marketing format to draw gamblers into playing in their casinos,  expecting to be fully without kyc, but in the end their still may get asked to pass kyc when need arises,  so for sure the statements doesn't go as a professional statement if their still ask for kyc along the way. Casinos need to be specific about such statements and how they act along with it.

[Hazink]

@NoToKYC I have a question which I have been longing to ask but forgotten. I believe the list of casinos which are supposed to be made available for your service should be Nookyc casinos, which is looking at the list of casinos which are listed to be zero KYC. I can find some of the popular casinos here with Betpanda and Winna included, and this casino might not ask for KYC instantly, but they have it in their policy that they have right to ask for it anytime if you need arises should such casinos still be rated as zero KYC casinos ?

[Joy- maker]

Saying No KYC but then asking for verification during withdrawals could be a potential scam. If they plan to ask for KYC later, they should clearly say it from the start.
Players choose this casino because they expect privacy, so hiding such requirements only makes people lose trust.

This is what most casinos do, and  am not just saying it for saying sake, this exact things has happened to me not once, not twice, but multiple times, because am this kind of person who like trying out new casinos to see how they operate, at first the casinos will come to us as KYC free casinos and during the sign up process they will not request for your KYC, or they will just request for Mini KYC, then after you most have played on those casinos for long time without initiating any withdrawal, and I happen to be among those guys who don't like to withdraw their win's immediately from a casino, let's say one day you decide to make withdrawal for the first, boom KYC will be required before you can make a withdrawal, and this behaviour from casino's is not longer seating well with me, because I have lost a lot of funds because of this madness coming from casino's, because I normally register on those platforms with my nickname just to try them out, and not with my main name, and some casinos will end up requesting you provide credentials that will match with the name you used during the registration process, see madness and I believe a lot of person's has also lost funds because of this madness.

[Promocodeudo]

Those no kyc statements by some casinos are just a marketing format to draw gamblers into playing in their casinos,  expecting to be fully without kyc, but in the end their still may get asked to pass kyc when need arises,  so for sure the statements doesn't go as a professional statement if their still ask for kyc along the way. Casinos need to be specific about such statements and how they act along with it.

You are right and it is good that you said for some casinos, but any casino using No KYC language as strategy to get the attention or to entice player aren't getting it right, for me, I think is good for any casino to be sincere to there players from the onset instead of trying to getting their attention and when the finally start gambling with the platform, the platform will introduce KYC for their own selfish reason, however, if a casino introduce KYC for a good reason even when they never mentioned that earlier, I don't think there's anything wrong with that after all we should know that they are been regulated but they reasons for such decision of theirs should be communicated to their customers and it should be a convincing reason, but if they do this having some silly shit in mind that's when it will not make sense any  sense, Casinos has to build trust with their customers in other to get reputation to avoid losing customers at anytime, but what we should know is that shady casinos will continue to surface in the gambling space and we must also be very careful on the ones to gamble with irrespective of how enticing they are.

[Odusko]

@NoToKYC I have a question which I have been longing to ask but forgotten. I believe the list of casinos which are supposed to be made available for your service should be Nookyc casinos, which is looking at the list of casinos which are listed to be zero KYC. I can find some of the popular casinos here with Betpanda and Winna included, and this casino might not ask for KYC instantly, but they have it in their policy that they have right to ask for it anytime if you need arises should such casinos still be rated as zero KYC casinos ?

Same as someone saying that stake casino is a no KYC, haha that will be the biggest joke of the Year, so I assume the same thing applicable to the casinos mentioned too, like betpanda etc, not asking for KYC documents at the point of registration doesn't mean that a platform is a no KYC, so the project needs to be specific and revisit the list their have as no KYC casinos.

[mitchr4]

No-kyc casino is a good marketing stap.
Now many people do not want to pass kyc because they do not know how they personal data will be used.
People do not trust the casino and the conditions how they safe their personal data.

Indeed It is better to avoid providing personal data to casino. As long as we play responsibly and follow the rules, I believe we won't be asked to complete KYC. However, the situation will be different if we play with large amounts whether at new or popular casino they are likely to ask for KYC.
Our personal data is stored in their database and we cannot know how secure it is. Therefore, it's better to avoid completing the KYC process if requested.

[adultcrypto]

No-kyc casino is a good marketing stap.
Now many people do not want to pass kyc because they do not know how they personal data will be used.
People do not trust the casino and the conditions how they safe their personal data.

Indeed It is better to avoid providing personal data to casino. As long as we play responsibly and follow the rules, I believe we won't be asked to complete KYC. However, the situation will be different if we play with large amounts whether at new or popular casino they are likely to ask for KYC.
Our personal data is stored in their database and we cannot know how secure it is. Therefore, it's better to avoid completing the KYC process if requested.

If there are platforms that allow one to play and withdraw especially when the winning is big, there will be no need for anyone to contemplate providing KYC details because those are very sensitive data. Just unfortunate that some KYC always put clauses that suggest that they will ask for KYC when there is big winning. I don't know why they do that and some use that clause to stress users when they win something big in their platform.

[GiftedMAN]

Indeed It is better to avoid providing personal data to casino. As long as we play responsibly and follow the rules, I believe we won't be asked to complete KYC. However, the situation will be different if we play with large amounts whether at new or popular casino they are likely to ask for KYC.
Our personal data is stored in their database and we cannot know how secure it is. Therefore, it's better to avoid completing the KYC process if requested.

If there are Casinos that are willing to accept players that will be playing with huge amounts of money without requesting for KYC before withdrawal regardless of the amount I think they will be better, Casinos can not limit the players because of their usual KYC requirements before withdrawal cases and if you are willing to do your KYC you can't be sure your data is safe in their hands. There should be a situation where there will be a total no KYC Casino operating on it's own but the rules should be strick for all players and if any one is caught cheating they kick such person out but the situation where by players have to play with small amounts just to avoid doing their KYC is not ok for me.

[Hazink]

@NoToKYC I have a question which I have been longing to ask but forgotten. I believe the list of casinos which are supposed to be made available for your service should be Nookyc casinos, which is looking at the list of casinos which are listed to be zero KYC. I can find some of the popular casinos here with Betpanda and Winna included, and this casino might not ask for KYC instantly, but they have it in their policy that they have right to ask for it anytime if you need arises should such casinos still be rated as zero KYC casinos ?

Same as someone saying that stake casino is a no KYC, haha that will be the biggest joke of the Year, so I assume the same thing applicable to the casinos mentioned too, like betpanda etc, not asking for KYC documents at the point of registration doesn't mean that a platform is a no KYC, so the project needs to be specific and revisit the list their have as no KYC casinos.

They really need to be specific if they don't want to mislead customers that will come through them, and it seems @NoToKYC is not even active on this thread anymore, as there have been few questions channeled to them which have not been answered.

[Gentle_Soul]

Is this some kind of movement (starting from your username to the way you post, you sound like it)? I think you should stick with the "no KYC" narrative because if you say "we prioritize low" KYC thing that means that still have KYC in it and that's perfectly not align to your mission. Of course, these days that's a rare case unless you stumble upon a dApp casino which is truly decentralized.

Yeah exactly my point low kyc does not sound ok with me the kyc process should be done or should not be done .
It's either the casino is using kyc or its not using kyc this is my humble opinion anyways

[Bushdark]

From what I understand about KYC and Casinos is that, there is a regulatory laws that guides these Casinos and they have to abide by those rules.Even though I Casino may not require KYC from you at the beginning they may eventually dose if you win a Large some of money and wants to withdraw. This is because the sake of transparency in the part of the Casino and following regulatory laws so that the Casino will not be seen as a tool of siphoning money. But why will anyone Gambling be afraid of doing KYC at the first place.

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

[Ruttoshi]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

I agree with you that it will be less fraud if the gamers in casino will pass kyc procedures.
If person passed kyc he will make less fraud because casino will know his personal data.

You are among the people shilling this thread for the OP, because I don't see how your reply corresponds with the quoted post.

The OP can mislead new gamblers who don't know how to find out if a casino is a no KYC or not, because most casinos in the OP are KYC. I have gambled in one of them and I passed through KYC. The bottom line is that only casinos that are scammers will claim to be a no KYC casino whereas, they're asking customers for KYC after a win.

Are these casinos in the OP paying the OP for this deceitful act.

[SuperBitMan]

From what I understand about KYC and Casinos is that, there is a regulatory laws that guides these Casinos and they have to abide by those rules.Even though I Casino may not require KYC from you at the beginning they may eventually dose if you win a Large some of money and wants to withdraw. This is because the sake of transparency in the part of the Casino and following regulatory laws so that the Casino will not be seen as a tool of siphoning money. But why will anyone Gambling be afraid of doing KYC at the first place.

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

I agree with you that it will be less fraud if the gamers in casino will pass kyc procedures.
If person passed kyc he will make less fraud because casino will know his personal data.

Yes you are right, and that is the reason why I usually love casinos that accept kyc and make it compulsory because it reduces scam, when someone is engaged in any scam related activity in a casino it is very easy for the casino to detect the person but when there is no kyc anything can happen in the casino and body will find out the person behind it which is very bad, this is the reason why a lot of casinos make kyc compulsory because without being able to dictate scam or someone that is behind any scam activity the casino will easily fall because people won't be interested to visit the casino anymore.
When people are saying they don't like casinos that request for kyc I usually don't understand them because this casinos are doing this for the growth of their business and for the safety of their business.

[Mr Reporter]

Indeed It is better to avoid providing personal data to casino. As long as we play responsibly and follow the rules, I believe we won't be asked to complete KYC. However, the situation will be different if we play with large amounts whether at new or popular casino they are likely to ask for KYC.
Our personal data is stored in their database and we cannot know how secure it is. Therefore, it's better to avoid completing the KYC process if requested.

If there are Casinos that are willing to accept players that will be playing with huge amounts of money without requesting for KYC before withdrawal regardless of the amount I think they will be better, Casinos can not limit the players because of their usual KYC requirements before withdrawal cases and if you are willing to do your KYC you can't be sure your data is safe in their hands. There should be a situation where there will be a total no KYC Casino operating on it's own but the rules should be strick for all players and if any one is caught cheating they kick such person out but the situation where by players have to play with small amounts just to avoid doing their KYC is not ok for me.

Hmmm!! I think I get where you’re coming from to me I feel like this whole KYC thing can feel like a privacy nightmare, especially when you’re trying to move big money around.

A no‑KYC casino sounds ideal until you think about the risks
without any identity check, it’s easier for fraudsters to slip in, and if something goes sideways there’s little recourse.

[Hazink]

Op still haven’t answered my question neither have any of their representatives that’s if they have one here.

Hmmm!! I think I get where you’re coming from to me I feel like this whole KYC thing can feel like a privacy nightmare, especially when you’re trying to move big money around.

A no‑KYC casino sounds ideal until you think about the risks
without any identity check, it’s easier for fraudsters to slip in, and if something goes sideways there’s little recourse.

I don't see any risk associated with Nokyc casino for the user. As the user, you are risk free of getting your identity exposed to people who you don't know if they can keep it safe or not. The only risk here is that being a non-KYC casino means you might not be regulated and there is no licensing from any authority which the casino can disappear at anytime which most supposedly regulated casinos can still vanish if they want to.

This KYC of a thing is just about fulfilling regulatory requirements and also using it as a means to detect multiple users.

[tami40]

I think it's false advertising and I'm suspicious of the casinos advertising no KYC and then asking for KYC upon withdrawal. If they lie on this, what else will they lie to us?

It would not make any sense of a casino that is KYC claim to be no KYC. This would be the highest deceit I've ever seen if what you have written is true and I am yet to get clarity on this your claim. Most of the casinos that are in this community are KYC casinos and I don't see any big deal to seeing more KYC casinos in this forum. It would be sad for a casino that continues to ask their players for their credentials to be claiming something different. I also know their are semi KYC casinos that will not ask you for complex verification.

I fully support your opinion, as making claims of a casino that does not have any KYC would be seriously misleading, and the users would need to send identification at a later time. One of the most significant aspects as far as trust in the gambling industry is concerned is transparency, particularly, in crypto casinos. Players should be informed in advance of the fact of the existence of KYC, and in which circumstances. Most platforms promote no KYC only to verify the user later on, when they are about to make withdrawals or higher sums of money, which is misleading. Semi-KYC models, as you referred to, at least are more fair, as they confirm that verification can be imposed on certain activities or at certain limits. Nothing is wrong with KYC itself, but misleading advertisement harms the reputation. The casino must be consistent in their advertisements and their real practices to ensure that their players will be confident in them in the long run.

[Futurexxx]

Yes you are right, and that is the reason why I usually love casinos that accept kyc and make it compulsory because it reduces scam, when someone is engaged in any scam related activity in a casino it is very easy for the casino to detect the person but when there is no kyc anything can happen in the casino and body will find out the person behind it which is very bad, this is the reason why a lot of casinos make kyc compulsory because without being able to dictate scam or someone that is behind any scam activity the casino will easily fall because people won't be interested to visit the casino anymore.
When people are saying they don't like casinos that request for kyc I usually don't understand them because this casinos are doing this for the growth of their business and for the safety of their business.

As the popular saying goes, what have an advantage will surely have a disadvantage, and that is how kyc is, it has it good side, which is making it very easy to detect anyone that engaged in any fraudulent activities, while the bad side is that their will be no privacy.

But for a no kyc casino, the good part is that it preserves your privacy since you wouldn't be doing any kyc, but the bad part is that if anything happens, the casino will be unable to detect the person that is involved in such an activity, so they both have their advantage and disadvantages.

[GiftedMAN]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

[bitmover]

Casinos need to check for case of cheating and that could be the reason why they often ask for KYC when you win big amount of money. Some also will want to cheat you looking for any tangible reason they can disqualify you so that you can not withdraw your money.
These are done often by potentially known scam casinos with the mindset to ban you so you don't have the liberty to withdraw or charge them for unlawful ban. The good casinos can will have nothing in mind to make you lose your money.

Casinos should have a better way to identify scammers and fraudsters using their  platform they cannot force anyone to do kyc after winning big money because they want to be sure that those winners did not cheat on the site, if it is only big wins that draws their attention to impose Kyc on their customers that means they do not want their customers to win at all.
I think the main reason why some casinos decide to impose a law to their customers after big wins is because they do not want to pay their customers so they can not be trusted as they are the real scammers.

I don't think that casinos demand KYC after big wins because they want to cheat players.

I think they are forced by regulations to identify the person who is receivinga high  amount of money.  This is important for many reasons, including taxes and regulations.

Ofc some casinos may try to find a reason not to pay, but I dont think this is the most common situation.

[virasog]

I don't think that casinos demand KYC after big wins because they want to cheat players.

I think they are forced by regulations to identify the person who is receivinga high  amount of money.  This is important for many reasons, including taxes and regulations.

Ofc some casinos may try to find a reason not to pay, but I dont think this is the most common situation.

I think that kyc allows to have less fraud in casino.
If person passed kyc he will use less fraud playing in casino.
What do you think about this? 

The only thing that the gambler can do in a non-KYC casino is to make multiple accounts to get the benefits from bonuses and promotions. That's the only fraud the gambler can do. They cannot win games or manipulate to win games etc. They cannot interfere with the backend code, change anything related to house edge or the fundamental fairness of the games or anything that can make them win big.

The only abuse the person can do is to make many accounts at the casino and the purpose already told above that is to get deposits bonuses or other benefits multiple times.