The most liquid companies in the gambling industry

[Dunamisx]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earned in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Although it seems to me that this is a good figure of $5k, because Calrouno says $2k for the mere fact that it is a figure that seems quite decent, but there are casinos that if you are going to make a withdrawal of $50-100usd then they already ask you the KYC , then these things can be a little more flexible, so when you talk About how to do Things better it may be that that amount can be given to a casino without problems, but I have seen that at any time the casinos prepare for your withdrawal They have to comply with the KYC , I don't know if in the future People will not play as much or become aware of the issue of identification because as I said , Adoption before was a problem  now the problem will be that People will Not want to comply with these requirements, because if the governments come to the Conclusion that those who manipulate crypto will have to pay high Sums of money in Taxes, because no one will want to pay it , at least in my country People will look for a way to evade it , the Government If you have too much money and don't have good Policies , then they obviously Won't Help.

If people in Europe Still think that they have to give the Government money for just using crypto , then things will be very different , it may be that they accept it and say yes to their conditions, but in the case of the majority, maybe they already They won't want this, so we all know what anonymity means, the privacy that no one is aware of how much money they manipulate, because in part if those things are known it is not good, it is also dangerous, I understand that part, so it is better to avoid this type of things so that other types of problems are not triggered later just by using crypto.

From the moment the KYC began to be issued for the excahges and casino, I knew that things were not going in the right direction, however in some Cases they have been able to enter with the regulations at full speed and the people Accept them, and incredible, for That talked about the $10k requirement, but $5k is acceptable.

Regulations can't affect those who use non-custodial wallets and decentralized exchange platforms and also avoid KYC-focused casino platforms because your public wallet address that shows how many Bitcoins you have doesn't have a direct link to you which means that the government or the regulators cannot know that you are the owner of that wallet so that they can tax you for it or ask you for money just for using cryptocurrencies.

However, if you use KYC-based platforms and send and receive assets to your KYCed account from your main wallet, it will be revealed that you are the one who has custody of that wallet and then they can link it to you and then tax you for what you own or spend every time.

Well, I think that the majority of us who are here have left their KYC in the main exchange platforms, casinos and everything that has to do with these houses that manage money, in a decentralized exchange lpatfoam, the truth is I don't trust, If a theft occurs, who will respond? I consider that no one will say that it was a hack and that's not how things are, so we prefer to have a centralized excage, a centralized casino just because we know that we can count on them as it is, because they provide security, and they provide what we can and We seek to have, security can mean everything, but as you say, regulations are the things that distract us from the good thing about crypto, I have always said something, if bitcoin was created we should not detract from its function, Satoshi invented it so that We can have the financial freedom that we do not have with the money of the fiat system, neither banks nor third parties that tell us what things we should do or what permissions we should have, then this case is not fulfilled.

Now the regulations have Entered the casinos and exchanges, they wash their hands of what they say and affirm that they must comply with these demands so that they do not take away their licenses and yes, for one thing they are right , without that they cannot do anything, but how is it done? here? who loses? the casinos ? Or us, obviously us , because before in 2017 there was no mandatory KYC and then how did they do it? It was obvious that the ID was enough for things to go well, then we are people who should see those things, because before yes and now no, then they are a series of things that sometimes we as players do not fit, and that is enough for us to say no, not so much for the old casinos because they are the most reliable in the world, but in this sense things can happen that we accept our data for KYC just for the Fact of being reliable, the new Companies , the new casinos are the ones that suffer the most.

[danadc]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earned in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

I also see that their casinos that are physical are very unlikely to become scams and if they do, they do not do it with the impudence of an online casino, that the online casino the disadvantage that we have as players is that it cannot be done There are other things to accept, because if they block the funds it is something shocking what they do by not allowing it to be taken out, then it is a robbery at least, on the other hand if there is a problem in a physical casino, the imdaitetnte person then goes and licks and does all the There is a fuss so that they can give you your money or something, but it is something that can be resolved at once, in a physical casino it is like that, but not in an online casino.

Online casinos are always very different in rules and in their ways of handling things, I am aware that in an online casino money is much more wasted than in a physical casino, that is the problem of trusting in casinos like this.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Although it seems to me that this is a good figure of $5k, because Calrouno says $2k for the mere fact that it is a figure that seems quite decent, but there are casinos that if you are going to make a withdrawal of $50-100usd then they already ask you the KYC , then these things can be a little more flexible, so when you talk About how to do Things better it may be that that amount can be given to a casino without problems, but I have seen that at any time the casinos prepare for your withdrawal They have to comply with the KYC , I don't know if in the future People will not play as much or become aware of the issue of identification because as I said , Adoption before was a problem  now the problem will be that People will Not want to comply with these requirements, because if the governments come to the Conclusion that those who manipulate crypto will have to pay high Sums of money in Taxes, because no one will want to pay it , at least in my country People will look for a way to evade it , the Government If you have too much money and don't have good Policies , then they obviously Won't Help.

If people in Europe Still think that they have to give the Government money for just using crypto , then things will be very different , it may be that they accept it and say yes to their conditions, but in the case of the majority, maybe they already They won't want this, so we all know what anonymity means, the privacy that no one is aware of how much money they manipulate, because in part if those things are known it is not good, it is also dangerous, I understand that part, so it is better to avoid this type of things so that other types of problems are not triggered later just by using crypto.

From the moment the KYC began to be issued for the excahges and casino, I knew that things were not going in the right direction, however in some Cases they have been able to enter with the regulations at full speed and the people Accept them, and incredible, for That talked about the $10k requirement, but $5k is acceptable.

In any case, the limit amount should be several thousand dollars and more than $2 K, of course.  But when you are required to KYC when withdrawing $100, this of course resembles insanity, simply because the amounts required to process this personal information and the cost of its confidential storage are already beginning to be commensurate with such small amounts.  

As for the taxation of cryptocurrencies, it is natural that if governments decide to make taxation large, for example 30%, then naturally no normal person will perceive this positively.  And massive tax evasion to some other jurisdiction will spread everywhere.  And at the same time, jurisdictions with little taxation or no taxation at all will certainly appear somewhere in the world.  
So the government has a lot to think about before introducing brutal and huge taxation on cryptocurrency payments.

Well, I do know that governments are very given that the money that should be given to them does not matter how, it has to be fulfilled, personally, Primarily the casinos have to do something so that these requirements are gradually eliminated so that they give more options To win, it is not possible that to withdraw 100usd you have to do a level 1 KYC, otherwise they simply do not give you the money, and that is somewhat unfair, which is why casinos now take these into Consideration Things are going to start to make a difference, in general the casinos that are older don't have as much of a problem with these things, especially since things can happen that way, but now I have seen that casinos that are new, what they need of clients, because they put many commissions, apart from the proeñla that they put with the VPN, something that does not seem at all logical to me or bother them for that, so this type of thing is the ones that the cians I know can fight to remove and let play well to your clients.

I think that a casino is more Liquid when it allows its customers to enter and does not make their lives so impossible, that they allow them to withdraw Small Amounts and that they do not put so many "buts" on them, these types of things are What they have to focus on as a challenge. I don't see any caisnos or avanlancabde caisnos that there are because if we look at it there are many that enter, but few stay and that is something that we notice Immediately , for that reason it is that every time we are in a casino we must Check the Tos to see if a withdrawal with KYC is required immediately, even if it is with 100usd or less, which does not seem like it to me but those are their policies that seem absurd to me, if a casino focuses more on getting more customers without worrying so much about the KYC because there they will start to notice the differences, there will be many more customers there, because they respect more the fact that if you Enter, deposit and register, the registration will be done immediately and they will not have to wait So much so, and after a KYC you Wouldn't get into trouble with the Government Demanding taxes.

[delfastTions]

~ snip ~

In any case, the limit amount should be several thousand dollars and more than $2 K, of course.  But when you are required to KYC when withdrawing $100, this of course resembles insanity, simply because the amounts required to process this personal information and the cost of its confidential storage are already beginning to be commensurate with such small amounts.  

As for the taxation of cryptocurrencies, it is natural that if governments decide to make taxation large, for example 30%, then naturally no normal person will perceive this positively.  And massive tax evasion to some other jurisdiction will spread everywhere.  And at the same time, jurisdictions with little taxation or no taxation at all will certainly appear somewhere in the world.  
So the government has a lot to think about before introducing brutal and huge taxation on cryptocurrency payments.

~~~~
I think that a casino is more Liquid when it allows its customers to enter and does not make their lives so impossible, that they allow them to withdraw Small Amounts and that they do not put so many "buts" on them, these types of things are What they have to focus on as a challenge. I don't see any caisnos or avanlancabde caisnos that there are because if we look at it there are many that enter, but few stay and that is something that we notice Immediately , for that reason it is that every time we are in a casino we must Check the Tos to see if a withdrawal with KYC is required immediately, even if it is with 100usd or less, which does not seem like it to me but those are their policies that seem absurd to me, if a casino focuses more on getting more customers without worrying so much about the KYC because there they will start to notice the differences, there will be many more customers there, because they respect more the fact that if you Enter, deposit and register, the registration will be done immediately and they will not have to wait So much so, and after a KYC you Wouldn't get into trouble with the Government Demanding taxes.

Whatever you and I come up with and whatever we discuss, there is always a request from some Internet users for anonymity, including, of course, gamblers.  For this reason, this market niche will never be empty.  And there will certainly be casinos that do not mock their players with these very checks and KYC when the player uses cryptocurrencies, the nature of which preserves anonymity for itself.  Of course, there may be nuances here in the form of a limit on the amount of money won in gambling that a casino client is going to transfer to his personal account.  This amount can be specified in the ToS, of course, and rightly so. 
But there is another side to the issue, which is that many new casinos with very tempting withdrawal conditions may turn out to be fraudulent from the very beginning.  And such advertising in the form of a guarantee not to require KYC is simply an option to attract additional customers who naively think that this fake casino will not deceive them.  But I think that such casinos are, first of all, an object for law enforcement agencies to search for its organizers.  And law enforcement officers simply must do their job efficiently, especially since the Internet makes it possible to track such types of fraud.  And in the case of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology in general, there is always indisputable evidence of fraud.

 But, to summarize: the demand for anonymous casinos gives rise to the supply of such services and it will have to exist.  And over time, I hope, they will be officially and legally legalized in some jurisdictions.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~ snip ~

In any case, the limit amount should be several thousand dollars and more than $2 K, of course.  But when you are required to KYC when withdrawing $100, this of course resembles insanity, simply because the amounts required to process this personal information and the cost of its confidential storage are already beginning to be commensurate with such small amounts.  

As for the taxation of cryptocurrencies, it is natural that if governments decide to make taxation large, for example 30%, then naturally no normal person will perceive this positively.  And massive tax evasion to some other jurisdiction will spread everywhere.  And at the same time, jurisdictions with little taxation or no taxation at all will certainly appear somewhere in the world.  
So the government has a lot to think about before introducing brutal and huge taxation on cryptocurrency payments.

~~~~
I think that a casino is more Liquid when it allows its customers to enter and does not make their lives so impossible, that they allow them to withdraw Small Amounts and that they do not put so many "buts" on them, these types of things are What they have to focus on as a challenge. I don't see any caisnos or avanlancabde caisnos that there are because if we look at it there are many that enter, but few stay and that is something that we notice Immediately , for that reason it is that every time we are in a casino we must Check the Tos to see if a withdrawal with KYC is required immediately, even if it is with 100usd or less, which does not seem like it to me but those are their policies that seem absurd to me, if a casino focuses more on getting more customers without worrying so much about the KYC because there they will start to notice the differences, there will be many more customers there, because they respect more the fact that if you Enter, deposit and register, the registration will be done immediately and they will not have to wait So much so, and after a KYC you Wouldn't get into trouble with the Government Demanding taxes.

Whatever you and I come up with and whatever we discuss, there is always a request from some Internet users for anonymity, including, of course, gamblers.  For this reason, this market niche will never be empty.  And there will certainly be casinos that do not mock their players with these very checks and KYC when the player uses cryptocurrencies, the nature of which preserves anonymity for itself.  Of course, there may be nuances here in the form of a limit on the amount of money won in gambling that a casino client is going to transfer to his personal account.  This amount can be specified in the ToS, of course, and rightly so. 
But there is another side to the issue, which is that many new casinos with very tempting withdrawal conditions may turn out to be fraudulent from the very beginning.  And such advertising in the form of a guarantee not to require KYC is simply an option to attract additional customers who naively think that this fake casino will not deceive them.  But I think that such casinos are, first of all, an object for law enforcement agencies to search for its organizers.  And law enforcement officers simply must do their job efficiently, especially since the Internet makes it possible to track such types of fraud.  And in the case of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology in general, there is always indisputable evidence of fraud.

 But, to summarize: the demand for anonymous casinos gives rise to the supply of such services and it will have to exist.  And over time, I hope, they will be officially and legally legalized in some jurisdictions.

You are absolutely right, in fact when I started to know about casinos, bitcoins and all this part, I was part of a project of a privacy policy that was going to last, because for me it seemed or maximum, because for me it was always better having that type of currency that became impossible to trace and I liked that, because from the beginning I always thought about those rights, privacy and anonymity and just what we were really looking for , because those are things that we always thought about obtaining.

But actually the Cassians are not like that, they do not provide this type of service, and there is no way to excahnge them, so in any of the Jurisdictions things will be very unfavorable for us as players, but how can it be done currently? because I know that if you as a player stand up in protest you will not do anything, it has to be a conglomerate that stands up and no longer accepts this type of things, and seeing how everything is going, I think that in the future the players will seek to become more involved anonymous, with more privacy, because there will be Freedom from everything.

Casinos will always make the difference, they are companies that will always handle a lot of money, but what happens if 70-80% of the players stop playing? Would it force casinos to not continue with KYC? because they would go bankrupt.

[paxmao]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earned in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

However people may be less reluctant to use an on-line less known place rather than a physical location. It happens also to many people when shopping, not just for gambling - the physical location is both a marketing spot and a sign of having some real business behind. Yes, there can be criminals, but there are usually also some ways to protect the cash - not that people use cash that much.

[EarnOnVictor]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earned in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

I share in the view of both you, and @Slow death has very good points, and you have somewhat good points too, but still, I will dance more to the side of @Slow death because all that he said are realities of the day, except that it can't be as total as he stated it. Whether true or not, people believe better in the kind of brick-and-mortar arrangement where they would be able to see the representatives of the casinos. In some cases where it is the direct involvement of the casinos and not agents/franchisement that is involved in establishing the casinos, there is this high level of trust, especially if what they have in the building is worth a fortune to dissuade them from disappearing into thin air. This arrangement often encourages gamblers and they do not always have that power as though they are entirely online that they are untouchable.

Having a physical presence even means that you have the highest chance of registering and being regulated in the country you are in. The report against the casino could be severely sanctioned if found guilty of this arrangement. For this, the casinos would want to be sincere to a great extent and not be awkward in behaviour like most online casinos do. Also, I would like you to consider the fact that you overemphasized things here. How many physical casinos have you heard were harassed or robbed? These guys are not foolish enough to have to hold huge money with them all the time. Even some people who patronise them do transfer to them and not pay with physical cash. The same thing goes to when they want to pay huge money, they do not pay in cash. Above all, no business is without its issues, but the way we handle them matters.

[delfastTions]

~snip ~

You are absolutely right, in fact when I started to know about casinos, bitcoins and all this part, I was part of a project of a privacy policy that was going to last, because for me it seemed or maximum, because for me it was always better having that type of currency that became impossible to trace and I liked that, because from the beginning I always thought about those rights, privacy and anonymity and just what we were really looking for , because those are things that we always thought about obtaining.

But actually the Cassians are not like that, they do not provide this type of service, and there is no way to excahnge them, so in any of the Jurisdictions things will be very unfavorable for us as players, but how can it be done currently? because I know that if you as a player stand up in protest you will not do anything, it has to be a conglomerate that stands up and no longer accepts this type of things, and seeing how everything is going, I think that in the future the players will seek to become more involved anonymous, with more privacy, because there will be Freedom from everything.

Casinos will always make the difference, they are companies that will always handle a lot of money, but what happens if 70-80% of the players stop playing? Would it force casinos to not continue with KYC? because they would go bankrupt.

What you are talking about, I think, is the obvious dream of any normal cryptocurrency owner.
 It’s just that the cryptocurrency was originally created thanks to Satoshi’s brilliant invention as an anonymous means of payment.  And it’s not for nothing that the world still doesn’t know who Satoshi is. 
I hope that anonymous and private payment processes will still develop in parallel with personalized and non-anonymous payments.  There are simply areas of human activity where secret money transfers are preferable.  I am not talking about criminals, fraudsters and those who launder criminal money.  Law enforcement agencies must fight them; it is their task to track down and catch such criminals.  And put them in prison.  I'm talking about ordinary people who are law-abiding but who need anonymity.
 By the way, in a casino, in my opinion, most of the players would prefer not to reveal their identity.  And there are many reasons for this. 
For example, a player does not want his employer to know about his passion for gambling.  Since this can harm such an employee.  And there are many other reasons to remain anonymous.

[LUCKMCFLY]

For example, a player does not want his employer to know about his passion for gambling.  Since this can harm such an employee.  And there are many other reasons to remain anonymous.

This is a very important point, there are many jobs that are very careful when choosing their workers, basically because in each company each of the workers are direct ambassadors of the company, for that reason they turn out to be jealous, and sometimes because The criteria and standards of the same company would not be good if they were discovered in gambling or something similar, sometimes it is not good seen in jobs that are more delicate, they can be banks or government entities, especially if they are regulators of the Likewise, if a casino could Offer a paid service that guarantees the non-identification of players who want to remain Anonymous , I think it would be a good option and that this data would be saved in a type of DeepVault that works only with the player's private keys. to whom you want to provide the service, that may be one of the things they can do , it doesn't Matter , it may be that for the service they have to pay 2 or 3 USD per month , but it would be worth it, of course it is a solution that It occurred to me, I Don't know how Viable it would be.

Regarding  crimes that can be committed, we know that criminals will always find any type of tool to use in their favor, that will always be something that cannot be avoided.

[Dunamisx]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earned in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

However people may be less reluctant to use an on-line less known place rather than a physical location. It happens also to many people when shopping, not just for gambling - the physical location is both a marketing spot and a sign of having some real business behind. Yes, there can be criminals, but there are usually also some ways to protect the cash - not that people use cash that much.

There's also a means of making all these through the online gambling platform, some of them take advantages in making advertisements as well using adds but their difference is that you can have other things advertised on their platform than what they do as service while on the physical sites, you can buy and sell on real items and make business as well outside the contest of the gambling platform because their regulations does not restrict for doing such.

[delfastTions]

For example, a player does not want his employer to know about his passion for gambling.  Since this can harm such an employee.  And there are many other reasons to remain anonymous.

This is a very important point, there are many jobs that are very careful when choosing their workers, basically because in each company each of the workers are direct ambassadors of the company, for that reason they turn out to be jealous, and sometimes because The criteria and standards of the same company would not be good if they were discovered in gambling or something similar, sometimes it is not good seen in jobs that are more delicate, they can be banks or government entities, especially if they are regulators of the Likewise, if a casino could Offer a paid service that guarantees the non-identification of players who want to remain Anonymous , I think it would be a good option and that this data would be saved in a type of DeepVault that works only with the player's private keys. to whom you want to provide the service, that may be one of the things they can do , it doesn't Matter , it may be that for the service they have to pay 2 or 3 USD per month , but it would be worth it, of course it is a solution that It occurred to me, I Don't know how Viable it would be.

Regarding  crimes that can be committed, we know that criminals will always find any type of tool to use in their favor, that will always be something that cannot be avoided.

I also know that in many countries employers very carefully and carefully study the overall lifestyle of the employee they hire.  Obviously this applies to well-paid jobs.  And such a hobby as gambling will definitely spoil the image of an employee if the employer finds out about it either when hiring, or this person is already working in this position.  This may even be a reason for dismissal.  And the employer can be understood simply because he can place the employee’s passion for gambling even on the same level in assessing an employee with such obvious human vices as alcoholism or drug addiction.  It’s just that the employer sees such a person as an avid gambler, even if the employee is not one.
 That is why maintaining anonymity, including the method you wrote about, is very important for the career and, in general, for the work activity of the employee.  And the loss of anonymity in this case can have catastrophically destructive consequences for this player.

[LUCKMCFLY]

For example, a player does not want his employer to know about his passion for gambling.  Since this can harm such an employee.  And there are many other reasons to remain anonymous.

This is a very important point, there are many jobs that are very careful when choosing their workers, basically because in each company each of the workers are direct ambassadors of the company, for that reason they turn out to be jealous, and sometimes because The criteria and standards of the same company would not be good if they were discovered in gambling or something similar, sometimes it is not good seen in jobs that are more delicate, they can be banks or government entities, especially if they are regulators of the Likewise, if a casino could Offer a paid service that guarantees the non-identification of players who want to remain Anonymous , I think it would be a good option and that this data would be saved in a type of DeepVault that works only with the player's private keys. to whom you want to provide the service, that may be one of the things they can do , it doesn't Matter , it may be that for the service they have to pay 2 or 3 USD per month , but it would be worth it, of course it is a solution that It occurred to me, I Don't know how Viable it would be.

Regarding  crimes that can be committed, we know that criminals will always find any type of tool to use in their favor, that will always be something that cannot be avoided.

I also know that in many countries employers very carefully and carefully study the overall lifestyle of the employee they hire.  Obviously this applies to well-paid jobs.  And such a hobby as gambling will definitely spoil the image of an employee if the employer finds out about it either when hiring, or this person is already working in this position.  This may even be a reason for dismissal.  And the employer can be understood simply because he can place the employee’s passion for gambling even on the same level in assessing an employee with such obvious human vices as alcoholism or drug addiction.  It’s just that the employer sees such a person as an avid gambler, even if the employee is not one.
 That is why maintaining anonymity, including the method you wrote about, is very important for the career and, in general, for the work activity of the employee.  And the loss of anonymity in this case can have catastrophically destructive consequences for this player.

I agree with that motion, because it is logical that an employer has a person who carefully studies the background of the potential employee and if he knows that he plays in a casino, the employer will want to watch his back, the first thing they think is that they are not going to hire to a person who is probably addicted (even if they are not) that is most of the Perception that they have about the people who gamble in the casino, of course not everyone thinks those things about the people who gamble in the casino, but Since we live in a society where they basically like to generalize and have the appearance of a typically perfect person, they cling to those standards to justify their decision, and not only for that, but if the person hires someone and has problems, the company is in the obligation that your employee needs specialized care, then the company has to assume those expenses, which is something that companies do not like to assume.

These reasons are extremely important when it comes to anything, not just a job, but anything in everyday life, it is a thousand times better to maintain privacy and anonymity for these reasons and many more, we live in a system that requires having certain rules, that when they are not followed you can be judged, although the truth is that it doesn't matter to me, if no one tells me in front of me anything doesn't matter to me, because I am a person who is so involved in my things that I don't care what people think.

[delfastTions]

For example, a player does not want his employer to know about his passion for gambling.  Since this can harm such an employee.  And there are many other reasons to remain anonymous.

This is a very important point, there are many jobs that are very careful when choosing their workers, basically because in each company each of the workers are direct ambassadors of the company, for that reason they turn out to be jealous, and sometimes because The criteria and standards of the same company would not be good if they were discovered in gambling or something similar, sometimes it is not good seen in jobs that are more delicate, they can be banks or government entities, especially if they are regulators of the Likewise, if a casino could Offer a paid service that guarantees the non-identification of players who want to remain Anonymous , I think it would be a good option and that this data would be saved in a type of DeepVault that works only with the player's private keys. to whom you want to provide the service, that may be one of the things they can do , it doesn't Matter , it may be that for the service they have to pay 2 or 3 USD per month , but it would be worth it, of course it is a solution that It occurred to me, I Don't know how Viable it would be.

Regarding  crimes that can be committed, we know that criminals will always find any type of tool to use in their favor, that will always be something that cannot be avoided.

I also know that in many countries employers very carefully and carefully study the overall lifestyle of the employee they hire.  Obviously this applies to well-paid jobs.  And such a hobby as gambling will definitely spoil the image of an employee if the employer finds out about it either when hiring, or this person is already working in this position.  This may even be a reason for dismissal.  And the employer can be understood simply because he can place the employee’s passion for gambling even on the same level in assessing an employee with such obvious human vices as alcoholism or drug addiction.  It’s just that the employer sees such a person as an avid gambler, even if the employee is not one.
 That is why maintaining anonymity, including the method you wrote about, is very important for the career and, in general, for the work activity of the employee.  And the loss of anonymity in this case can have catastrophically destructive consequences for this player.

I agree with that motion, because it is logical that an employer has a person who carefully studies the background of the potential employee and if he knows that he plays in a casino, the employer will want to watch his back, the first thing they think is that they are not going to hire to a person who is probably addicted (even if they are not) that is most of the Perception that they have about the people who gamble in the casino, of course not everyone thinks those things about the people who gamble in the casino, but Since we live in a society where they basically like to generalize and have the appearance of a typically perfect person, they cling to those standards to justify their decision, and not only for that, but if the person hires someone and has problems, the company is in the obligation that your employee needs specialized care, then the company has to assume those expenses, which is something that companies do not like to assume.

These reasons are extremely important when it comes to anything, not just a job, but anything in everyday life, it is a thousand times better to maintain privacy and anonymity for these reasons and many more, we live in a system that requires having certain rules, that when they are not followed you can be judged, although the truth is that it doesn't matter to me, if no one tells me in front of me anything doesn't matter to me, because I am a person who is so involved in my things that I don't care what people think.

Yeah!  Of course, maintaining anonymity when gambling is much preferable to publicly disclosing such personal information.  Sometimes there are cases when even the closest relatives do not know that their loved one is an avid gambler.  Apart from the employer, from whom it is of course better to hide such data, sometimes this hobby has to be hidden from the public simply because of the government policies of certain countries where there is a direct ban or public condemnation of gambling.  So there are many options for people who prefer to remain anonymous.  Even I think that the vast majority of players would prefer not to undergo KYC at a casino if they were confident in advance that the casino would accurately and without any problems pay them the money they won at any time the player wishes.  But this doesn’t happen in real life and players have to go through KYC. 

Nevertheless, I see a clear gap in legislation here, primarily in US legislation, which does not properly regulate such an issue.  And this should finally be done simply for reasons of humanizing society and preserving the human right to private life.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Yeah!  Of course, maintaining anonymity when gambling is much preferable to publicly disclosing such personal information.  Sometimes there are cases when even the closest relatives do not know that their loved one is an avid gambler.  Apart from the employer, from whom it is of course better to hide such data, sometimes this hobby has to be hidden from the public simply because of the government policies of certain countries where there is a direct ban or public condemnation of gambling.  So there are many options for people who prefer to remain anonymous.  Even I think that the vast majority of players would prefer not to undergo KYC at a casino if they were confident in advance that the casino would accurately and without any problems pay them the money they won at any time the player wishes.  But this doesn’t happen in real life and players have to go through KYC.  

Nevertheless, I see a clear gap in legislation here, primarily in US legislation, which does not properly regulate such an issue.  And this should finally be done simply for reasons of humanizing society and preserving the human right to private life.

It is very true, there is also something that the USA is Managing in a Great Way, it is that with their regulations they make the Countries of the world adapt to their measures, there it is, they say that it is going to Prohibit certain Countries so that they do not have Access to certain Privileges and the things are done as they say, so at a global level they pay a lot of attention to the power that the USA has, then these policies are passed on to the casinos, to the exchanges, and the main sites have regulations, then this type of thing has Decreased freedoms in Every sense, so when talking about KYC it is total control that is being Implemented, this is what is coming and each time anonymity, privacy is much less what People enjoy , the Flow Our data is quite Easy to find on the web, even so for people who do not like leaving traces on the Internet it is possible to find data about them, then, if they do not have social networks where their Names appear,  DNI, full name and sector where you live.

These are things that are Inexplicable to many , Because that is the Reason why people's Iinjuries sometimes Appear on the web and in reality

[Dunamisx]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earned in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

I share in the view of both you, and @Slow death has very good points, and you have somewhat good points too, but still, I will dance more to the side of @Slow death because all that he said are realities of the day, except that it can't be as total as he stated it. Whether true or not, people believe better in the kind of brick-and-mortar arrangement where they would be able to see the representatives of the casinos. In some cases where it is the direct involvement of the casinos and not agents/franchisement that is involved in establishing the casinos, there is this high level of trust, especially if what they have in the building is worth a fortune to dissuade them from disappearing into thin air. This arrangement often encourages gamblers and they do not always have that power as though they are entirely online that they are untouchable.

I got your points and you're absolutely right, in addition to it all, there are many things to consider before having a gambling platform established, the source to where this idea being generated is very important, some have it as a direct gambling business and they run their platform by themselves while some go into a partnership kind of franchise when the finance needed could not be able to catch up with the needs in demand, which is part of the serious challenges many platforms are having before the whole administration is being centralized into categories and you cannot easily effect any change or implement anything that has to do with financial liquidity.

[Ojima-ojo]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earn in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, and there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

I believe the CEO's knows the importance of the privacy and at will continue to operate with all levels of privacy and this is why we have come to a point where all the facts and factors point to the casino with the highest liquidity this is like it will be measured in terms of high withdrawal,  and also how best the casinos act within the stipulated laws that guide the conduct of all the parties involved.


Some time ago, I read somewhere how Stake paid winners $150,000 without any demand for KYC which shows how well the company pays attention to privacy, and the high available liquidity to pay customers.

[dezoel]

Some time ago, I read somewhere how Stake paid winners $150,000 without any demand for KYC which shows how well the company pays attention to privacy, and the high available liquidity to pay customers.

Gone are the days when one could deposit, gamble, and withdraw any amount in a cryptocurrency gambling platform without having to comply with AML and KYC rules because there was nothing of such kind back in the day. When we talk about privacy, reputable platforms always care about the privacy of their customers no matter what, some people think that the platform asking for KYC is hindering their privacy, but the reality is, that they are compelled to do that.

If a centralized platform doesn't comply with rules and regulations imposed by the authorities, they have the fear of their licenses getting cancelled and having their platforms closed down because they need to comply with the regulations, it's more of a necessity for them.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Some time ago, I read somewhere how Stake paid winners $150,000 without any demand for KYC which shows how well the company pays attention to privacy, and the high available liquidity to pay customers.

Gone are the days when one could deposit, gamble, and withdraw any amount in a cryptocurrency gambling platform without having to comply with AML and KYC rules because there was nothing of such kind back in the day. When we talk about privacy, reputable platforms always care about the privacy of their customers no matter what, some people think that the platform asking for KYC is hindering their privacy, but the reality is, that they are compelled to do that.

If a centralized platform doesn't comply with rules and regulations imposed by the authorities, they have the fear of their licenses getting cancelled and having their platforms closed down because they need to comply with the regulations, it's more of a necessity for them.

You are completely right, but unfortunately, this is something that most gamblers always fail to understand, they tend to blame the casino or curse the casino for imposing kyc verification on their account, forgetting that without the casino doing that, the casino may one day go offline without the possiblity of them coming back online, and when that happens, same customer complaining about the casino asking kyc document for verification, may also lose his or her money.

It's like you've said, gone are the days when the government cared less about the people and their online identities, alot have changed in this regard and we mustn't hate and boycott our favorite casinos because they are implementing kyc verification system and seem to be imposing it on their customers, no business wants to lose their customers, most especially, their loyal ones, but when it comes to kyc, most casino can't do much is it's completely out of their control.

[EarnOnVictor]

because in physical casinos people know that the chances of scams are very low, they know the owners of the casino and they know very well that the owner of the physical casino will not run away with the customers' money, because he will easily be arrested, and it would be without It makes sense for a rich physical casino owner to steal little money from customers, so in my opinion what makes physical casinos the ones that make the most money is the fact that physical casinos are more reliable

We have to consider the disadvantage of physical bulkiness, these gambling platforms are not safe in their physical appearance considering the amount of money they earn in fiat local currencies, they can be rendered under physical assault for theft, and there could also be a means of physical violence in some of these casino houses, gamblers can abuse the casinos in any manner of assault including their fellow gamblers which there's none of these in any form with online gambling platforms.

I believe the CEO's knows the importance of the privacy and at will continue to operate with all levels of privacy and this is why we have come to a point where all the facts and factors point to the casino with the highest liquidity this is like it will be measured in terms of high withdrawal,  and also how best the casinos act within the stipulated laws that guide the conduct of all the parties involved.


Some time ago, I read somewhere how Stake paid winners $150,000 without any demand for KYC which shows how well the company pays attention to privacy, and the high available liquidity to pay customers.

Whoa, that's kind of Stake.com and I must say that I love to read things like this as their campaigner. We can't ignore the importance of the high liquidity of any company we are dealing with and it's no news that Stake.com is a well-liquid casino and sportsbook with a huge track record so far. This coupled with the huge reputation it has built in the course of years.

Now imagine a person gambling with such a company, the fear would definitely be alleyed, and no matter how much the money to be wagered and the winning possibility, it would be rest assured that it will be taken care of by such a well-prepared company. Needless to say, Stake.com is managing the risk internally as well which also depends on the multiplier in the game in question. By this internal management, they will reasonably avoid the risks they can't be able to honour its winning. This is wise and helps both parties, but such an amount would have been so huge to say the least.