The most liquid companies in the gambling industry

[EarnOnVictor]

We use casinos based on trust and not by rating from diverse bodies or websites. Even some of these reports might also be faulty because the process of gathering these data might not be reliable or valid. We shouldn't also forget that these casinos can also give researchers fake data just to deceive customers. Gamblers should always stake only what they can afford to lose and should always use casinos in the forum. This is because you will have genuine feedback about casinos that is present here.

The issue of trust in sources of information regarding the reliability of any casino unfaamiliar to you is naturally one of the most important issues when a player decides that he wants to play in this particular casino.  In this process, players can easily rely on the information that is provided in the topics of the corresponding casinos on our forum.  I would even put the objectivity of player reviews in the relevant topics of a particular casino on the forum in first place compared to other information platforms.

 Another important question, naturally, is the question of how exactly a player makes the final decision to trust a particular casino and confidently deposits a lot of money in such a casino.  In this matter, every player, I think, has some kind of boundary that he crosses and no longer even thinks about the fact that the reliability of the casino may not be as high as it seemed to him.  All this also depends on what psychotype this player has and how prone he is to risky behavior.

Liquidity is important to be honest because it is not to be liked when you have made honest earnings - sometimes happens you know - and you really need to have it back for any imperious need. It can be really annoying to have to wait, and that can very well be caused because a site is not liquid enough so they will just put excuses to not allowing the withdrawal right that moment.

Have you also thought of the situation where you might be in dire need of the money and despite your casino being so big and well-liquid, they still deny you your withdrawal due to flimsy excuse(s)? Having liquidity is good indeed but choosing the right and trustworthy casino is key in my selection criteria. I don't think I've ever searched for casinos based on how rich they are, but I always search for casinos based on how reliable they are, and how people talk about them offline and online. The comments of people online, the kind of games I want to be playing with them, the provably fair system and all that. The customer service and how professionals they are handling cases are part of what I look for in my casino. Now imagine it, if a rich casino lacks all or most all of that, will you still deal with them just because they are big and well-liquid? This is what I am trying to say, your money will always be safe with a reliable casino, nevertheless, it will be a plus if they are rich and still possess all good characteristics.

[pinggoki]

Have you also thought of the situation where you might be in dire need of the money and despite your casino being so big and well-liquid, they still deny you your withdrawal due to flimsy excuse(s)? Having liquidity is good indeed but choosing the right and trustworthy casino is key in my selection criteria. I don't think I've ever searched for casinos based on how rich they are, but I always search for casinos based on how reliable they are, and how people talk about them offline and online. The comments of people online, the kind of games I want to be playing with them, the provably fair system and all that. The customer service and how professionals they are handling cases are part of what I look for in my casino. Now imagine it, if a rich casino lacks all or most all of that, will you still deal with them just because they are big and well-liquid? This is what I am trying to say, your money will always be safe with a reliable casino, nevertheless, it will be a plus if they are rich and still possess all good characteristics.

Trust in the casino can only be established if you play in it anyway, so maybe you're prioritizing something unrealistically. Although I don't agree that the large liquidity is the key attraction to play in a casino, trustworthiness should be found when you finally do something in the casino. Your strategy of looking at reviews and how people talk about the casinos online is a good way to know if it's a trustworthy casino or is it worth your time to play there is smart but isn't totally foolproof because there's a possibility that sneaky casinos use underhanded techniques like planting fake comments in their competitors and planting good comments in their casinos so I take those reviews with a grain of salt.

[rachael9385]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

[rodskee]

Strongly Agree!
The need for trust in a gambling firm is beyond the degree of liquidity in the firm's financials. There are loads of illiquid company's who were once liquid, more liquid than the ones currently waving the flag of liquidity. Some liquid companies also with-hold payments through hidden policies and make you feel like you are not deserving of your wins.

I know liquidity is essential as it convinces you that your wins can be paid out but its not the only feature to look out for in gambling firms.

Once we have made a decision for going i to gambling, then we have also signed the agreement for taking a risk as am endorsement because we cannot be sure in knowing the true nature or motive of a gambling platform until we have their experience, wether they are most liquid or not, this talks more about having a trust in them than in what they delivers and how they have been consistent in doing that for years, money or no money we need an approval of their trust.

Trust in making decisions on a gambling platform is indeed an important thing and the main key lies in a person's personality, therefore we must be able to know whether the company is truly liquid or not, if we are still not sure. and the company has not proven or explained this. Whether we are liquid or not, we have to think carefully before entering the company, because this concerns our future lives, if we enter the wrong company then it is very likely that we will regret it and the opportunity will not come a second time.

This is why the waiting game takes place and this is what i used mostly before engaging
and dealing in gambling site that I am going to play and deposit because this forum is very helpful as there are
many gamblers here or account that knows how to dig gambling sites about their being suspicious and their
possible attempt of being scammed.there is no problem to ask this forum first so why need to have problem
about how the liquidity of each site is when we can at least take some time first  before trusting .

[TravelMug]

Have you also thought of the situation where you might be in dire need of the money and despite your casino being so big and well-liquid, they still deny you your withdrawal due to flimsy excuse(s)? Having liquidity is good indeed but choosing the right and trustworthy casino is key in my selection criteria. I don't think I've ever searched for casinos based on how rich they are, but I always search for casinos based on how reliable they are, and how people talk about them offline and online. The comments of people online, the kind of games I want to be playing with them, the provably fair system and all that. The customer service and how professionals they are handling cases are part of what I look for in my casino. Now imagine it, if a rich casino lacks all or most all of that, will you still deal with them just because they are big and well-liquid? This is what I am trying to say, your money will always be safe with a reliable casino, nevertheless, it will be a plus if they are rich and still possess all good characteristics.

Trust in the casino can only be established if you play in it anyway, so maybe you're prioritizing something unrealistically. Although I don't agree that the large liquidity is the key attraction to play in a casino, trustworthiness should be found when you finally do something in the casino. Your strategy of looking at reviews and how people talk about the casinos online is a good way to know if it's a trustworthy casino or is it worth your time to play there is smart but isn't totally foolproof because there's a possibility that sneaky casinos use underhanded techniques like planting fake comments in their competitors and planting good comments in their casinos so I take those reviews with a grain of salt.

There is a saying that trust is earn, so if we don't play on that casino, then obviously there is no trust. Or if there is some reputable members that have review that casino for now, so that we will be spare of depositing on them and at the end, withdrawal will be denied. But in the end of it all, do gamblers really look for the numbers behind and see what companies is liquid or not specially specially in online platforms that we have? Or have we seen top crypto based platforms releasing such numbers like their fiat counterpart? So this is just factor that we have to look at online casinos. Reputation is one and then it cascaded to other parameters like support and their trust from this community and others including liquidity.

[zuzie]

Trust in making decisions on a gambling platform is indeed an important thing and the main key lies in a person's personality, therefore we must be able to know whether the company is truly liquid or not, if we are still not sure. and the company has not proven or explained this. Whether we are liquid or not, we have to think carefully before entering the company, because this concerns our future lives, if we enter the wrong company then it is very likely that we will regret it and the opportunity will not come a second time.

This is why the waiting game takes place and this is what i used mostly before engaging
and dealing in gambling site that I am going to play and deposit because this forum is very helpful as there are
many gamblers here or account that knows how to dig gambling sites about their being suspicious and their
possible attempt of being scammed.there is no problem to ask this forum first so why need to have problem
about how the liquidity of each site is when we can at least take some time first  before trusting .

It could be that by waiting for the final result of a game, someone will start to think about whether the casino platform can be trusted or not. Apart from that, we can also see or listen to the experiences of other gamblers when they have entered one of them. from the casino platform, and then what they will experience. This is proof of whether the casino account has liquidity or not.
Then, if you read the experiences of friends on this forum, it is clear that we both give each other advice, remind each other and of course share experiences in discussing gambling, with the aim of behaving well in carrying out gambling activities.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

If it was all about the casino not having money to pay their winners, and asks for time to settle such dept, then it's still very understandable, I personally have come across a new casino on this forum (can't remember the name) that categorically stated in their terms of service that who ever won any amount of money above $2000 would have to wait up to a week or more to receive the payment since they are still very limited on bankroll to be able to pay or settle big wins immediately.

If a new and yet untrusted can be this transparent to their users and potential users, I think in the long run, such a casino will do well regardless of their current situation in terms of finance, since that shows that they are be atleast trusted to a certain level.

But then, I believe the reason why most gamblers avoid casinos that are new and have not built any reputation is because, most will bluntantly refuse to pay their winners, they may use kyc as an excuse, or find something to say that the customer did and for that, he or she will have to forfeit his or her winning back to them.

[Dunamisx]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

The only advantage i see in a reputable gambling platform is the best desirability you got served with, trust and their loyalty to gamblers, but irrespective of the type or category of a gambling platform used, they all have thesame level of risk being involved in using their website or while gambling in general because we either win or loose, there's no preferential treatment on any gambler under any form of calibre.

[Kavelj22]

From there individual point of view, there is no need to make accounts on many gambling sites in order to fulfil gambling desires. Since gambling needs only luck to be successful, the luck does not change with the change of the gambling sites. Some people believe that they are more lucky playing at certain sites while unlucky at others, well it is just superstitious thoughts and in reality, a change of sites won't have any impact on your luck.

Although the casino is considered a loser when it pays out the winnings of the winners, in reality it makes no difference to the casino because it will always pay from the money that the gamblers lose, which is always more than what the casino has to pay, or in the most extreme cases they use the money deposited at the house edge.

Changing the casino will provide psychological comfort to the gambler who has no luck on a particular platform, but this does not mean at all that luck will necessarily be on his side. The whole process may become useless if he has to complete the registration procedures on the new platform, unless he already has accounts at different casinos.

[EarnOnVictor]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

The only advantage i see in a reputable gambling platform is the best desirability you got served with, trust and their loyalty to gamblers, but irrespective of the type or category of a gambling platform used, they all have thesame level of risk being involved in using their website or while gambling in general because we either win or loose, there's no preferential treatment on any gambler under any form of calibre.

I believe you should gamble without fear or intimidation when you are dealing with a reputable casino, so the extra you added to it is just a means of discouragement which shouldn't be. Unless your casino is not reputable enough, you do not have to be afraid in any way, all you need to do is to make sure that they have all you need in your casinos before having dealings with them. If they do not have it complete, that still does not change the fact that they are reputable as long as all that they have is being used to serve you right.

In this regard, it's you who would be at fault if you allege them as they are good with their games, especially when they have good support and process your withdrawal pretty fast. Generally, apart from playing games on their platforms, I believe that what most people look up to in their casino is their withdrawal, if the withdrawal is not denied even if it's delayed sometimes for investigative purposes, this is still fine. Above, all, everyone might want to have an alternative casino, it is such a way to be sure that nothing unplanned happens to their gambling account. We can't trust any casino 100%.

[Jating]

From there individual point of view, there is no need to make accounts on many gambling sites in order to fulfil gambling desires. Since gambling needs only luck to be successful, the luck does not change with the change of the gambling sites. Some people believe that they are more lucky playing at certain sites while unlucky at others, well it is just superstitious thoughts and in reality, a change of sites won't have any impact on your luck.

Although the casino is considered a loser when it pays out the winnings of the winners, in reality it makes no difference to the casino because it will always pay from the money that the gamblers lose, which is always more than what the casino has to pay, or in the most extreme cases they use the money deposited at the house edge.

Changing the casino will provide psychological comfort to the gambler who has no luck on a particular platform, but this does not mean at all that luck will necessarily be on his side. The whole process may become useless if he has to complete the registration procedures on the new platform, unless he already has accounts at different casinos.

I think as individuals, we sometimes look for psychological comfort, or at least try no one so that we won't be that guy that just play on one casino and become loyal to them. So yeah, why not try other reputable casinos along the way.

Who knows, maybe your luck will change for the better if you are willing to risk and deposit money to a new casinos. So for me, I don't see wrong with creating on many gambling sites. Yes, there could be superstitions, as gamblers is known to be like that, however, for me, there is that beginners luck that you might experience if you try new sites.

[Dunamisx]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

The only advantage i see in a reputable gambling platform is the best desirability you got served with, trust and their loyalty to gamblers, but irrespective of the type or category of a gambling platform used, they all have thesame level of risk being involved in using their website or while gambling in general because we either win or loose, there's no preferential treatment on any gambler under any form of calibre.

I believe you should gamble without fear or intimidation when you are dealing with a reputable casino, so the extra you added to it is just a means of discouragement which shouldn't be. Unless your casino is not reputable enough, you do not have to be afraid in any way, all you need to do is to make sure that they have all you need in your casinos before having dealings with them. If they do not have it complete, that still does not change the fact that they are reputable as long as all that they have is being used to serve you right.

In this regard, it's you who would be at fault if you allege them as they are good with their games, especially when they have good support and process your withdrawal pretty fast. Generally, apart from playing games on their platforms, I believe that what most people look up to in their casino is their withdrawal, if the withdrawal is not denied even if it's delayed sometimes for investigative purposes, this is still fine. Above, all, everyone might want to have an alternative casino, it is such a way to be sure that nothing unplanned happens to their gambling account. We can't trust any casino 100%.

We are almost saying the same thing here, a gambler can make his decision on what he wants wether to use a casino or go for another since no one os forcing us to use any, there's a way we could also go about it in finding the best we want from a particular one we tried and sees offers what we want, this is not about being afraid of them, but i used the word loyalty because they are the gambler's best at the moment since he finds pleasure in them and they could also earned his loyalty by using their platform for gambling each time.

[Kavelj22]

From there individual point of view, there is no need to make accounts on many gambling sites in order to fulfil gambling desires. Since gambling needs only luck to be successful, the luck does not change with the change of the gambling sites. Some people believe that they are more lucky playing at certain sites while unlucky at others, well it is just superstitious thoughts and in reality, a change of sites won't have any impact on your luck.

Although the casino is considered a loser when it pays out the winnings of the winners, in reality it makes no difference to the casino because it will always pay from the money that the gamblers lose, which is always more than what the casino has to pay, or in the most extreme cases they use the money deposited at the house edge.

Changing the casino will provide psychological comfort to the gambler who has no luck on a particular platform, but this does not mean at all that luck will necessarily be on his side. The whole process may become useless if he has to complete the registration procedures on the new platform, unless he already has accounts at different casinos.

I think as individuals, we sometimes look for psychological comfort, or at least try no one so that we won't be that guy that just play on one casino and become loyal to them. So yeah, why not try other reputable casinos along the way.

Who knows, maybe your luck will change for the better if you are willing to risk and deposit money to a new casinos. So for me, I don't see wrong with creating on many gambling sites. Yes, there could be superstitions, as gamblers is known to be like that, however, for me, there is that beginners luck that you might experience if you try new sites.

In this way, you confirm the emotional point of view held by gamblers, which, although psychologically comfortable, is logically very weak. It can be said that it is a way to reduce the tension resulting from successive losses in the same casino, so the gambler chooses to change the casino under the illusion that his bad luck was due to his choosing the wrong casino and not because gambling is originally a practice based on pure luck.

Following the same logic, it is assumed that there are platforms that are better than others in terms of achieving profit, and this is absolutely not true. You will find users on all platforms who are not lucky, and if they change casinos, they will inevitably choose casinos that have gamblers who were also unlucky.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

If it was all about the casino not having money to pay their winners, and asks for time to settle such dept, then it's still very understandable, I personally have come across a new casino on this forum (can't remember the name) that categorically stated in their terms of service that who ever won any amount of money above $2000 would have to wait up to a week or more to receive the payment since they are still very limited on bankroll to be able to pay or settle big wins immediately.

If a new and yet untrusted can be this transparent to their users and potential users, I think in the long run, such a casino will do well regardless of their current situation in terms of finance, since that shows that they are be atleast trusted to a certain level.

But then, I believe the reason why most gamblers avoid casinos that are new and have not built any reputation is because, most will bluntantly refuse to pay their winners, they may use kyc as an excuse, or find something to say that the customer did and for that, he or she will have to forfeit his or her winning back to them.

The good transparency and truth above all of any casino is always appreciated, this is always very well seen, I personally would think that things when it comes to a new casino are always more focused on winning and earning whatever it may be, but the The fact that they said that more than $2k and paying it after a week, seems like a good act to me, because that prevents the casino from becoming decapitalized and a period of one week gives time to coinsure money in case they don't have it, I could To say that things can be very well like this, some people who don't have patience will find that condition to be a bit silly and a failure, but things are better this way, now the people who want to adapt to that condition are fine, and if not, well now You know, this type of sincerity is nice, now, as far as that is concerned, it is fine, but the casino should also be even more sincere, for example, since now the KYC requirement is quite strong and mandatory, they should do something so that They can warn you that before making any deposit you should worry about complying with KYC requirements.

Why this? It is well known that the majority of casinos have to meet this requirement, but clients are something that some do not care about, others do not, because they do not like to leave their data, so they are surprised that when they go to Withdraw their money Well, they find that they cannot because simply, this is something that they must comply with, well, in the case of seven cases things should be clear, some say that the casinos when they say something like that, then the players will run and even more so if they are casinos New, but it is Preferable to do it this way , because you can be quite Effective at the same time, because the players will say, this casino was honest from the beginning and that is valuable, then things can be quite good when you are totally Sincere in these processes, I would say things will be better in the Future.

[Unsoldier]

From there individual point of view, there is no need to make accounts on many gambling sites in order to fulfil gambling desires. Since gambling needs only luck to be successful, the luck does not change with the change of the gambling sites. Some people believe that they are more lucky playing at certain sites while unlucky at others, well it is just superstitious thoughts and in reality, a change of sites won't have any impact on your luck.

Although the casino is considered a loser when it pays out the winnings of the winners, in reality it makes no difference to the casino because it will always pay from the money that the gamblers lose, which is always more than what the casino has to pay, or in the most extreme cases they use the money deposited at the house edge.

Changing the casino will provide psychological comfort to the gambler who has no luck on a particular platform, but this does not mean at all that luck will necessarily be on his side. The whole process may become useless if he has to complete the registration procedures on the new platform, unless he already has accounts at different casinos.

I know that gambling players may change casinos due to negative reviews about security, payouts or service. Switching to a casino with a more positive reputation can increase gambling satisfaction. Plus, a new casino may give access to more favorable bonuses or promotions for its users.

[so98nn]

All of them are Stock listed companies so it is evident that they are having high liquidity. I mean if they are offering public shares then they are invested by traders thus gaining huge loudmouth apart from the gambling industry itself. Some of them have as much as 3000+ employees working in their offices. They are huge man, no doubt an online gambling website would ever have such high liquidity. The reason is simple they have to rely entirely on the money that is getting deposited by the gamblers. There is no fixed security on an online cashier because a user can always withdraw as much as they want at anytime. However, the ones in OP are having extra backing from the share market. So no comparison between the two type of business model for sure.

[Kavelj22]

From there individual point of view, there is no need to make accounts on many gambling sites in order to fulfil gambling desires. Since gambling needs only luck to be successful, the luck does not change with the change of the gambling sites. Some people believe that they are more lucky playing at certain sites while unlucky at others, well it is just superstitious thoughts and in reality, a change of sites won't have any impact on your luck.

Although the casino is considered a loser when it pays out the winnings of the winners, in reality it makes no difference to the casino because it will always pay from the money that the gamblers lose, which is always more than what the casino has to pay, or in the most extreme cases they use the money deposited at the house edge.

Changing the casino will provide psychological comfort to the gambler who has no luck on a particular platform, but this does not mean at all that luck will necessarily be on his side. The whole process may become useless if he has to complete the registration procedures on the new platform, unless he already has accounts at different casinos.

I think as individuals, we sometimes look for psychological comfort, or at least try no one so that we won't be that guy that just play on one casino and become loyal to them. So yeah, why not try other reputable casinos along the way.

Who knows, maybe your luck will change for the better if you are willing to risk and deposit money to a new casinos. So for me, I don't see wrong with creating on many gambling sites. Yes, there could be superstitions, as gamblers is known to be like that, however, for me, there is that beginners luck that you might experience if you try new sites.

In fact, there may be better opportunities to change the casino in certain cases when the casino is new and grants privileges to new registrants such as bonuses on the first deposit and free spins. This will increase the probability of winning since the number of attempts will increase given the value of the bonus.

However, we must not forget that new casinos come with a high risk rate due to the lack or absence of reviews on them, and also that the first deposit bonus is determined by the value of the deposit, which increases the risk rate the higher the value of that first deposit.

[redsun114]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

It's not just about the fact that reputable casinos can pay a gambler if they manage to win something big, but they are generally considered to be safe because a casino with a low reputation among the gambling community might refuse to pay a gambler if they win a big amount by making some excuse by banning or blocking their accounts or maybe asking for requirements that aren't fulfillable by the gambler just so that they give up on the money and leave.

When a gambler joins a reputable gambling platform, they have the surety that there won't be any problems with their deposits and withdrawals as long as they have complied with all their rules and regulations and have completed all the requirements put ahead by the casino which is why such platforms have good reputation.

[danadc]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

It's not just about the fact that reputable casinos can pay a gambler if they manage to win something big, but they are generally considered to be safe because a casino with a low reputation among the gambling community might refuse to pay a gambler if they win a big amount by making some excuse by banning or blocking their accounts or maybe asking for requirements that aren't fulfillable by the gambler just so that they give up on the money and leave.

When a gambler joins a reputable gambling platform, they have the surety that there won't be any problems with their deposits and withdrawals as long as they have complied with all their rules and regulations and have completed all the requirements put ahead by the casino which is why such platforms have good reputation.

That's the difference, I think that anyone who plays a good game in a casino aspires to make sure everything doesn't go wrong, that is, to win in a casino, which rarely happens, but when it happens and the casino refuses to withdraw the money, it is something that is already annoying, and if it is about how the casino can do to have everything good in its maximum potential , to Create a good reputation is to demonstrate that there will be no problems with nothing, the first thing I do with a casino is that, check its reputation and it is obvious that you have to go for the casino with the best reputation, because it is assumed that there will be no problems and if there are, they make sure that it does not happen to older, that is what a good casino guarantees.

I don't trust the casinos that are new, they are for me casinos that have to be very careful, because a deposit or something like that is easy to make and Accept but the problem is when making Withdrawals , either due to the requirements of KYC or casino policies.

[AmoreJaz]

Gambling in a reputable casino doesn't mean that the gambler must win, the only thing I see there is that everyone will just respect them selfs and will be treated equally no matter how much one has lost or even win.
However, the chances of winning might be there are it will just be one gambler and a system and not more gamblers with just one system but on the local casino that doesn't have a good reputation (either offline or online) sometimes even those a gambler win hug amount of money, there will not be enough money for the company to pay the winner, but it is not like that in a good and reputable casino.

It's not just about the fact that reputable casinos can pay a gambler if they manage to win something big, but they are generally considered to be safe because a casino with a low reputation among the gambling community might refuse to pay a gambler if they win a big amount by making some excuse by banning or blocking their accounts or maybe asking for requirements that aren't fulfillable by the gambler just so that they give up on the money and leave.

When a gambler joins a reputable gambling platform, they have the surety that there won't be any problems with their deposits and withdrawals as long as they have complied with all their rules and regulations and have completed all the requirements put ahead by the casino which is why such platforms have good reputation.

if a casino refused to pay the winning gambler, they will for sure find ways or loopholes not to release his winnings. especially if the winnings is huge enough to lose their bankroll. this is why bigger casinos have better chance of not screwing large winning because they can afford to give it to their players.