The impact of war on global economy.

[Fara Chan]

that's right. I think the impact is even bigger than that. but the most important thing I think is the economy, especially in terms of food. in war food remains the main source of human energy. if there is a war of course its circulation will be very difficult. I think this is the main problem that is more serious than anything else from the war.

That is just part of several main things that can arise when war conditions begin to occur in a place. Because in general war can make the economy worse so that things such as foodstuffs and ready-to-use food are also affected by no longer being able to be supplied as they should. So these things were the first to experience bad influences apart from other things such as education and the development of the country's infrastructure which had not been completely repaired before the war occurred.

Apart from that, war itself can also destroy all agricultural land which can still be used as a basic source of food for local residents so that the food sector itself can suddenly experience paralysis if the war is still going on and never ends. Because farmers in war areas will definitely not be able to carry out their own activities as usual because they have to continue to protect themselves from war attacks, so this can really paralyze all economic sectors in a certain area.

[Vinaa77]

Spot on my friend but I’d also like to add some other things that are also impacted by global wars, one of them is Environmental degradation that has to do with the surroundings affected by the wars most depending on the type of weapons used the soils and water of the surrounding war fields become toxic for plant and human lives making it unsuitable to grow food and also for people to live in such surroundings.
Another major impact is that wars lead to extreme poverty most sources of livelihoods are destroyed during wars causing the nation’s to plunge into extreme poverty which in turn also leads to food insecurity starvation and further malnutrition just to name a few.
Not to even talk about displacement many people loose their families and friends, cultures and also history during times like this leaving them with no past only a present and a future it’s a sickening tale one we should all try to prevent at all cost.

There are many environmental impacts resulting from the war and it will be very difficult to recover and it will take a long time to be able to rebuild and this will be very detrimental to the people who live in that environment so they have to find a suitable place to live for them in a new place.

The destruction caused by war will indeed cause local people to lose their homes and have difficulty meeting nutritional needs in places of detention and many diseases suffered by those who are displaced due to war and this is truly a shame if war occurs in a country.

[ARTOIS]

Wars lead to the economic and infrastructure deterioration of countries, leading to a decline in the prices of financial assets such as stocks, and an increase in the value of safe currencies such as gold and the Japanese yen. Wars greatly affect the foreign exchange (Forex) market, as currency rates can change suddenly. When a war breaks out in a region, investors become cautious and look for currencies that are considered safe
Affects markets and currencies
Affects monetary policy
Impact on international investment
Impact on emerging markets and their stability.
There is many others problems that can effect all the planet.

[Betwrong]

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.
2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

I don't care if the increase in the national GDP of some countries can be caused by war and that some stock prices can rise, war is bad. Period. Innocent people are suffering, kids are dying FFS. The fact that it can be profitable for some people is disgusting. Everybody knows that and yet here we are: a lot of terrible wars in the 21st century.

[DrBeer]

I don't care if the increase in the national GDP of some countries can be caused by war .....

You have voiced a very subtle topic.
The point is that the GDP of a country that is actively at war may look good on the one hand, but on the other hand you have to realize that during a war the GDP generates products and services that do not create additional value for the economy. Take for example the terrorist country Russia - they claim that the economy is doing well, but in reality the economy is collapsing and the population is poor. Why ? Because about 40% of russia's budget goes to support the terrorist war - ammunition, shells, equipment, ammunition, payments to terrorists of the rf army...... And all this, after a very short time, turns into smoke, burned debris, corpses of their soldiers (and the loss of able-bodied population).  So the GDP of a country at war is not equal to the same GDP in peacetime !

[olib123]

In addition, war also caused the government to spend way more than its normal budget.  It also makes people suffer.  Transportation and logistic is also greatly affected so the distribution of trade is interrupted.  Continued war can result in famine, economic crash, destruction of properties and living things, and many more.  The only sectors that profit in this war are the weapon manufacturers and medical supplier.

[slapper]

that's right. I think the impact is even bigger than that. but the most important thing I think is the economy, especially in terms of food. in war food remains the main source of human energy. if there is a war of course its circulation will be very difficult. I think this is the main problem that is more serious than anything else from the war.

That is just part of several main things that can arise when war conditions begin to occur in a place. Because in general war can make the economy worse so that things such as foodstuffs and ready-to-use food are also affected by no longer being able to be supplied as they should. So these things were the first to experience bad influences apart from other things such as education and the development of the country's infrastructure which had not been completely repaired before the war occurred.

Apart from that, war itself can also destroy all agricultural land which can still be used as a basic source of food for local residents so that the food sector itself can suddenly experience paralysis if the war is still going on and never ends. Because farmers in war areas will definitely not be able to carry out their own activities as usual because they have to continue to protect themselves from war attacks, so this can really paralyze all economic sectors in a certain area.

Wars devastate, yes. There's more to food scarcity than missing meals. A damaged supply chain affects the economy and everyone's wallet. Farmers, traders, and consumers can't? They're left behind, prices soar, and purchasing power plummets. Wars freeze and reverse time. Education, healthcare, and innovation lose money for every bullet fired and field burned. And recovery? Economic revival is painful, not just rebuilding. This is about future prosperity, not simply survival. War is a luxury no nation can afford, as the economy shows

[Ozero]

Because of the war, people are destroyed and material wealth is destroyed, that is, the economy of the warring state is actually destroyed. But war negatively affects not only the economies of the warring states, but also the economies of other states.

Take, for example, the current Russian attack on Ukraine. In Russia itself, the economy has been rebuilt on a war footing. Enterprises and factories that previously produced products to improve people's lives now produce tanks, missiles and missiles, which are designed to be destroyed on the battlefield and destroy others. European countries, fearing aggression against them, also stepped up the production of deadly products. Fortifications are being built on the borders. Defense spending has increased in every state's budget, sometimes to the detriment of public services and social assistance for low-income individuals.

Instead of directing efforts to improve living standards, space exploration, and so on, because of the half-smart idiot Putin, tens and hundreds of billions of dollars literally turn into fire, smoke and ashes, claiming hundreds of thousands of human lives.

[Betwrong]

I don't care if the increase in the national GDP of some countries can be caused by war .....

You have voiced a very subtle topic.
The point is that the GDP of a country that is actively at war may look good on the one hand, but on the other hand you have to realize that during a war the GDP generates products and services that do not create additional value for the economy. Take for example the terrorist country Russia - they claim that the economy is doing well, but in reality the economy is collapsing and the population is poor. Why ? Because about 40% of russia's budget goes to support the terrorist war - ammunition, shells, equipment, ammunition, payments to terrorists of the rf army...... And all this, after a very short time, turns into smoke, burned debris, corpses of their soldiers (and the loss of able-bodied population).  So the GDP of a country at war is not equal to the same GDP in peacetime !

I absolutely agree with what you said. To me it's a pity that all people around the world can't (or don't want) understand these simple things. War is bad for any economy of any country that is at war, and it is for the global economy too. Because, like you righly said, many things turn into smoke, burned debris, corpses of their soldiers etc.

[DrBeer]

I don't care if the increase in the national GDP of some countries can be caused by war .....

You have voiced a very subtle topic.
The point is that the GDP of a country that is actively at war may look good on the one hand, but on the other hand you have to realize that during a war the GDP generates products and services that do not create additional value for the economy. Take for example the terrorist country Russia - they claim that the economy is doing well, but in reality the economy is collapsing and the population is poor. Why ? Because about 40% of russia's budget goes to support the terrorist war - ammunition, shells, equipment, ammunition, payments to terrorists of the rf army...... And all this, after a very short time, turns into smoke, burned debris, corpses of their soldiers (and the loss of able-bodied population).  So the GDP of a country at war is not equal to the same GDP in peacetime !

I absolutely agree with what you said. To me it's a pity that all people around the world can't (or don't want) understand these simple things. War is bad for any economy of any country that is at war, and it is for the global economy too. Because, like you righly said, many things turn into smoke, burned debris, corpses of their soldiers etc.

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

[Betwrong]

~

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

Maybe I'm over-optimistic in thinking that the civilized world has finally realized that tolerating these regimes is not a joke and must be eradicated like cancer cells? Iran, Russia, North Korea, these countries have very good people inside, but their governments can't be tolerated any more, they must be destroyed the sooner the better. I really think that many people came to this conclusion today and that the days of these regimes are numbered.

[DrBeer]

~

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

Maybe I'm over-optimistic in thinking that the civilized world has finally realized that tolerating these regimes is not a joke and must be eradicated like cancer cells? Iran, Russia, North Korea, these countries have very good people inside, but their governments can't be tolerated any more, they must be destroyed the sooner the better. I really think that many people came to this conclusion today and that the days of these regimes are numbered.

I absolutely agree with you! In all these countries there are a sufficient number of adequate people who have become hostage to the situation. But I’m not saying “eradicate the population”, I’m talking about eradicating such REGIMES. But the West missed the time when this could be done almost painlessly and with minimal “side effects.” Rogue regimes, over DECADES of softness in the West, have accumulated strength and strengthened each other (such as what is happening now - Russia is supplying missile and nuclear technologies to Iran and North Korea in exchange for UAVs, missiles, shells, cartridges) for terror in Ukraine

[serveria.com]

~

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

Maybe I'm over-optimistic in thinking that the civilized world has finally realized that tolerating these regimes is not a joke and must be eradicated like cancer cells? Iran, Russia, North Korea, these countries have very good people inside, but their governments can't be tolerated any more, they must be destroyed the sooner the better. I really think that many people came to this conclusion today and that the days of these regimes are numbered.

It's a sure way to start a nuclear war you realize that? An attempt to attack any of these countries will result in a nuclear apocalypse. Any more suggestions? 

[WillyAp]

I don't care if the increase in the national GDP of some countries can be caused by war and that some stock prices can rise, war is bad.

The theory of terrorism is to make people suffer, the same theory goes for sanctions.
For terrorism there are no innocents on this planet. All who support the system are guilty.

[DrBeer]

~

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

Maybe I'm over-optimistic in thinking that the civilized world has finally realized that tolerating these regimes is not a joke and must be eradicated like cancer cells? Iran, Russia, North Korea, these countries have very good people inside, but their governments can't be tolerated any more, they must be destroyed the sooner the better. I really think that many people came to this conclusion today and that the days of these regimes are numbered.

It's a sure way to start a nuclear war you realize that? An attempt to attack any of these countries will result in a nuclear apocalypse. Any more suggestions? 

Put these bastard regimes aside - we are GUARANTEED to get a sprawling cancerous tumor like the "Russian world", which even without nuclear weapons will destroy the civilized world, and make it, at best, a giant russia, northern correia, or similar bastard anti-human regime. Russia's threats of "nuclear dick" are just an attempt to intimidate the west, with the pathetic russian fuhrer knowing full well that once he gives the command he will be destroyed, which he is indescribably afraid of ! All tyrants are indescribably cowardly persons, it is an axiom !
Yes, what we must admit - tolerance, playing soft methods, and often corruption - allowed to give some time for such despicable regimes and gain strength. I am sure - the world has drawn conclusions, and the world's cancerous tumors will be isolated and bought. The world should live and develop, not fight and suffer !
The world economy cannot work only for war ! It is always easier to destroy, that is why such inadequate regimes choose the side of violence and destruction. To create is always more difficult !

[serveria.com]

~

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

Maybe I'm over-optimistic in thinking that the civilized world has finally realized that tolerating these regimes is not a joke and must be eradicated like cancer cells? Iran, Russia, North Korea, these countries have very good people inside, but their governments can't be tolerated any more, they must be destroyed the sooner the better. I really think that many people came to this conclusion today and that the days of these regimes are numbered.

It's a sure way to start a nuclear war you realize that? An attempt to attack any of these countries will result in a nuclear apocalypse. Any more suggestions? 

Put these bastard regimes aside - we are GUARANTEED to get a sprawling cancerous tumor like the "Russian world", which even without nuclear weapons will destroy the civilized world, and make it, at best, a giant russia, northern correia, or similar bastard anti-human regime. Russia's threats of "nuclear dick" are just an attempt to intimidate the west, with the pathetic russian fuhrer knowing full well that once he gives the command he will be destroyed, which he is indescribably afraid of ! All tyrants are indescribably cowardly persons, it is an axiom !
Yes, what we must admit - tolerance, playing soft methods, and often corruption - allowed to give some time for such despicable regimes and gain strength. I am sure - the world has drawn conclusions, and the world's cancerous tumors will be isolated and bought. The world should live and develop, not fight and suffer !
The world economy cannot work only for war ! It is always easier to destroy, that is why such inadequate regimes choose the side of violence and destruction. To create is always more difficult !

This is starting to look like hysteria already. You're apparently losing it... Every sentence ends with an exclamation mark. Reading your pointless propaganda posts I imagine Hitler giving a speech in front of a huge crowd Some "good" news from Donbas, probably? Don't worry, some more "good news" are coming: Chasiv Yar, Kramatorsk, Slavyansk. Wait for it... 

Anyway, what do you suggest? How do you imagine we can fight these "rogue countries"? Something we can really do, not just your verbal diarrhea. 

[DrBeer]

~

As reality has shown - normal people who value life, development, progress - are against war. But there are regimes that set themselves absolutely inadequate goals and realize their complexes. And their own population, duped by propaganda, serves as a tool for this. Who not only kill and destroy other countries, they do not have human values, they go to suicide themselves, deprive their country of the future, deprive the future of their children and grandchildren .... The problem with the world is that it's playing tolerance with these regimes. If they had not been allowed to develop over the last 20 years, the world would be living without problems now. Such regimes are like cancer cells, if they are not identified and destroyed in time, they will metastasize and start destroying everything around them. People have the highest value - life, while these criminal regimes have the highest value - destruction and annihilation

Maybe I'm over-optimistic in thinking that the civilized world has finally realized that tolerating these regimes is not a joke and must be eradicated like cancer cells? Iran, Russia, North Korea, these countries have very good people inside, but their governments can't be tolerated any more, they must be destroyed the sooner the better. I really think that many people came to this conclusion today and that the days of these regimes are numbered.

It's a sure way to start a nuclear war you realize that? An attempt to attack any of these countries will result in a nuclear apocalypse. Any more suggestions? 

Put these bastard regimes aside - we are GUARANTEED to get a sprawling cancerous tumor like the "Russian world", which even without nuclear weapons will destroy the civilized world, and make it, at best, a giant russia, northern correia, or similar bastard anti-human regime. Russia's threats of "nuclear dick" are just an attempt to intimidate the west, with the pathetic russian fuhrer knowing full well that once he gives the command he will be destroyed, which he is indescribably afraid of ! All tyrants are indescribably cowardly persons, it is an axiom !
Yes, what we must admit - tolerance, playing soft methods, and often corruption - allowed to give some time for such despicable regimes and gain strength. I am sure - the world has drawn conclusions, and the world's cancerous tumors will be isolated and bought. The world should live and develop, not fight and suffer !
The world economy cannot work only for war ! It is always easier to destroy, that is why such inadequate regimes choose the side of violence and destruction. To create is always more difficult !

This is starting to look like hysteria already. You're apparently losing it... Every sentence ends with an exclamation mark. Reading your pointless propaganda posts I imagine Hitler giving a speech in front of a huge crowd Some "good" news from Donbas, probably? Don't worry, some more "good news" are coming: Chasiv Yar, Kramatorsk, Slavyansk. Wait for it... 

Anyway, what do you suggest? How do you imagine we can fight these "rogue countries"? Something we can really do, not just your verbal diarrhea. 

For a resident of Russia, Hitler is obviously a respected type, after all, brother and ideologue of RASHISM I have long forgotten about this type, he was overshadowed by Adolf Putin ...

What are you so happy about? 10-30 square kilometers of total scorched land ? tens of thousands of rotting corpses of Russians on Ukrainian land, which nobody needs ? Tell me more about the A50, IL22, and 10 SU34/SU35/SU35S, on the ground in 10 days and the pilots of the remaining airplanes who are now forced to fly by threatening their families ! Is this the reason for your joy and pride ?

I reply to your only adequate suggestion for a solution - the solution is simple. Like any serious disease, it is necessary to systematically carry out "prevention" so that such regimes do not appear, and if such a "tumor" is found - destroy it until it does not metastasize like PMR, DNR, LNR, Abkhazia, .....
Such "soft" means include restriction of totalitarian and inadequate religious movements, education and development of the population (undeveloped, backward population is an ideal ground for building totalitarian regimes), economic education and economic development of countries and regions (poor population is also a fertile ground for inadequate regimes).
Also - reorganization of international institutions. At least the UN, the Red Cross and some others - completely discredited themselves, showed their unsuitability, and in some cases and diametrically opposite position to its purpose.

[WillyAp]

the world has drawn conclusions, and the world's cancerous tumors will be isolated and bought. The world should live and develop, not fight and suffer !
The world economy cannot work only for war ! It is always easier to destroy, that is why such inadequate regimes choose the side of violence and destruction. To create is always more difficult !

Well The EU is buying happily refabricated petrol products of India and other countries.
The embargo is not really doing what is was suppossed to do.

[Sarah_Jannat42]

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.
2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

Undoubtedly what you say is true, I see no reason to disagree here. Because war conflict never brings anything good to anyone, only harm is done from here. A country's infrastructural degradation occurs only through war, and its impact spreads badly in the global market. We have seen through the war in Europe how the price of oil has gone up in the world market, how the stock market has suffered and even the price of everything has gone up. Due to the war conflict, the two countries spent a large part of their income on the military sector through which their economic condition was seriously threatened and the production of the country's domestic product was drastically reduced and destroyed by the war. In the current era of globalization, when one country is damaged, the entire world system chain is damaged.

[bots1]

War actually has a big impact on the economy and other aspects. Moreover, modern warfare can make it difficult for the global economy to return to normal if it occurs for a long time. As a result of war, apart from high oil and energy prices, other commodities can experience price fluctuations, such as metals, aluminum and palladium. What is certain is that the impact of war could result in and complicate the FED's task of controlling inflation without triggering an economic recession.

Apart from that, there are many other economic impacts from the impact of the war, such as the stock market index declining, trade being disrupted, investors being afraid to come and existing investors leaving.