The impact of war on global economy.

[Argoo]

We will not really benefit from any war that takes place in another country, but it will even cause harm to the countries that are close to it, especially if the country involved in the war is one of those that export products to us that are also benefited by our country.

Now, the question is: why is there a war? That is because of the conquest that a leader makes in a country, which actually leads to fighting when they do not give each other the territory that they both claim. And besides that, the war will actually happen because it is also in the prophecy that cannot be stopped.

It is well known that wars, and especially big ones, mean the destruction of everything that man has built over decades and hundreds of years with his hard work. This is a lot of human lives that war takes. However, it is worth remembering that war is not a natural disaster. These are conscious actions of the leaders of states and their people, who carry out the criminal will of these leaders.

Russia's military attack on Ukraine, which has been going on for three years now, first of all means that humanity has not developed international institutions that could effectively influence the aggressor's long-term decision to continue a brutal war of aggression.

Russia's war against Ukraine is a classic colonial war in the center of Europe in the 21st century and has the goal, apart from some political aspects, of seizing Ukrainian territory that Russia had not previously claimed. After all, quite recently the Russian Federation signed a corresponding agreement with Ukraine on establishing common borders between these states without any reservations.

Society must unite and put hard pressure on the aggressor with all its might so that he renounces his intentions to resolve any issues by military means.

[Betwrong]

~
It is well known that wars, and especially big ones, mean the destruction of everything that man has built over decades and hundreds of years with his hard work. This is a lot of human lives that war takes. However, it is worth remembering that war is not a natural disaster. These are conscious actions of the leaders of states and their people, who carry out the criminal will of these leaders.

Russia's military attack on Ukraine, which has been going on for three years now, first of all means that humanity has not developed international institutions that could effectively influence the aggressor's long-term decision to continue a brutal war of aggression.

Russia's war against Ukraine is a classic colonial war in the center of Europe in the 21st century and has the goal, apart from some political aspects, of seizing Ukrainian territory that Russia had not previously claimed. After all, quite recently the Russian Federation signed a corresponding agreement with Ukraine on establishing common borders between these states without any reservations.

Society must unite and put hard pressure on the aggressor with all its might so that he renounces his intentions to resolve any issues by military means.

True words, brother. And the economic impact of this war that Putin unleashed is huge on almost every economy in the world. And when there's economic problems it's always the poor that suffer the most. Their little kids don't have enough food and even water in some places. Some of them die from that.

I'm positive that in modern times civilized society can stop aggression by applying only economic pressure on the aggressor country. Just economic pressure, but a harsh one. And they are not doing it.

[liasbaa]

~
It is well known that wars, and especially big ones, mean the destruction of everything that man has built over decades and hundreds of years with his hard work. This is a lot of human lives that war takes. However, it is worth remembering that war is not a natural disaster. These are conscious actions of the leaders of states and their people, who carry out the criminal will of these leaders.

Russia's military attack on Ukraine, which has been going on for three years now, first of all means that humanity has not developed international institutions that could effectively influence the aggressor's long-term decision to continue a brutal war of aggression.

Russia's war against Ukraine is a classic colonial war in the center of Europe in the 21st century and has the goal, apart from some political aspects, of seizing Ukrainian territory that Russia had not previously claimed. After all, quite recently the Russian Federation signed a corresponding agreement with Ukraine on establishing common borders between these states without any reservations.

Society must unite and put hard pressure on the aggressor with all its might so that he renounces his intentions to resolve any issues by military means.

True words, brother. And the economic impact of this war that Putin unleashed is huge on almost every economy in the world. And when there's economic problems it's always the poor that suffer the most. Their little kids don't have enough food and even water in some places. Some of them die from that.

I'm positive that in modern times civilized society can stop aggression by applying only economic pressure on the aggressor country. Just economic pressure, but a harsh one. And they are not doing it.

This war is basically an expression of Putin's arrogance which has changed the economic and geopolitical situation for the whole world. If the amount of money that is being spent on military could be donated to the underdeveloped countries of the world, it would be very positive for the world. There are many countries who are deprived of their basic needs and are living below the poverty line.

NATO member states, including the United States, have imposed various sanctions against aggressive countries, but Putin is more aggressive about war. In this case, he needs to be brought under the ban in more ways so that his power gradually decreases.

[cryptoWODL]

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.
2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

I think war is a bad thing as war destroys any country. If a war breaks out in a country then the GDP will never increase in that country but will decrease. War has a detrimental effect on the citizens of that country even on the economy of that country.

We can mention the war between Ukraine and Russia as a small example of this. Ukraine has suffered so much due to the war between Russia and Ukraine that we have seen one of our forum members asking for donations here to help with ambulances in Ukrainian hospitals and help the people of that country. Maybe because of the war in Ukraine, their economic situation, GDP has suffered greatly and their capital market has also suffered. Which has an impact on the citizens of their country. In war-torn countries, poor citizens suffer the most.

[ginsan]

1. Increase in the national GDP is least likely to be caused by a war.
2. Oil is considered the most crucial resource in modern warfare.
3. War affects the stock market by causing a decline in stock prices.

What do you guys think? Is this true or false?

I think war is a bad thing as war destroys any country. If a war breaks out in a country then the GDP will never increase in that country but will decrease. War has a detrimental effect on the citizens of that country even on the economy of that country.

We can mention the war between Ukraine and Russia as a small example of this. Ukraine has suffered so much due to the war between Russia and Ukraine that we have seen one of our forum members asking for donations here to help with ambulances in Ukrainian hospitals and help the people of that country. Maybe because of the war in Ukraine, their economic situation, GDP has suffered greatly and their capital market has also suffered. Which has an impact on the citizens of their country. In war-torn countries, poor citizens suffer the most.

Wars are always detrimental to both parties to the conflict, whatever the loss, such as facilities, access, economy and even deaths that cannot be blocked, this is certain and it is very detrimental in my opinion.

Not only the poor in my opinion, but everyone also suffers, the level of suffering I think it can not be normalized as a social standard, because if a rich person who is also affected by war such as his business or family is equally suffering, the war in Ukraine also affects the global economy both from petroleum trade which is getting more expensive because it is the material to continue the war and also some conditions that may be forced because of other needs such as people are afraid to export their oil because there is a war so that supplies are depleted and prices increase.

Even in my country, which is far away from the conflict but is affected by it, petroleum is expensive and we have to buy it at a high price too, and that causes some goods to be expensive because distributors need fuel to deliver all commodities to their consumers.

[Argoo]

We can mention the war between Ukraine and Russia as a small example of this. Ukraine has suffered so much due to the war between Russia and Ukraine that we have seen one of our forum members asking for donations here to help with ambulances in Ukrainian hospitals and help the people of that country. Maybe because of the war in Ukraine, their economic situation, GDP has suffered greatly and their capital market has also suffered. Which has an impact on the citizens of their country. In war-torn countries, poor citizens suffer the most.

Russia failed to achieve significant success on the battlefield, attacking what it thought was a defenseless Ukraine and hoping to completely seize its territory within days or weeks. But this war has been going on for three years now and without significant successes for Russia. Therefore, Putin’s Russia has changed its tactics and has been shelling cities and other populated areas of Ukraine every day for a long time using all possible military means, trying to sow chaos and significant displacement of civilian refugees. Almost every day there are attacks by missiles and drones on the entire territory of Ukraine, as well as more than a hundred front-line settlements from cannon artillery.

Particularly destructive is Russia’s use of high-power corrective bombs, weighing up to a ton or more.
However, yesterday, for the first time in history, the Russian occupiers dropped an aircraft high-explosive bomb FAB-3000 M-54 weighing three tons and having a warhead of 1.2 tons on a hospital building in the village of Liptsy in the Kharkov region. The bomb fell 15 meters from the hospital building, but even in this case it caused significant damage to the building.
https://focus.ua/voennye-novosti/653414-vs-rf-vpervye-udarili-trehtonnoy-bomboy-fab-3000-po-harkovshchine-video

[Lidger]

Although the war took place between two countries, its effects can be seen all over the world. For example, due to the war situation in Russia and Ukraine, it has a bad effect worldwide due to which economic crisis has occurred in various countries. Russia directly supplies many countries in the world with various raw materials for generating electricity including crude oil, but when the war between Russia and Ukraine took a terrible turn, all Russian imports and exports were stopped, but it had a negative impact on the whole world.

United Nations is there to maintain peace in the world, I think if the United Nations is serious about this, then no country may go to war. War brings only destruction, reconciliation is good not only for each other but for the whole world.

[Minor Miner]

United Nations is there to maintain peace in the world, I think if the United Nations is serious about this, then no country may go to war. War brings only destruction, reconciliation is good not only for each other but for the whole world.

I really don't know what the existence of the United Nations is, and it could be an organization that is also manipulated by certain powers to serve their own interests rather than being an organization and bringing justice for all humanity.

Furthermore, war is not good for people like us, but it is good for politicians, those who want to assert power, those who are greedy and want to dominate the world. For them war is a way to gain power and gain wealth through arms trade. That's why they always propagate to us that war is a crime, the destruction of humanity, but on the other hand, they are the creators of war.

[hahay]

Although the war took place between two countries, its effects can be seen all over the world. For example, due to the war situation in Russia and Ukraine, it has a bad effect worldwide due to which economic crisis has occurred in various countries. Russia directly supplies many countries in the world with various raw materials for generating electricity including crude oil, but when the war between Russia and Ukraine took a terrible turn, all Russian imports and exports were stopped, but it had a negative impact on the whole world.

United Nations is there to maintain peace in the world, I think if the United Nations is serious about this, then no country may go to war. War brings only destruction, reconciliation is good not only for each other but for the whole world.

I'm not sure the United Nations has a mission to maintain peace because after all, in this world it's not just about war, but it's also about genocide. But after all, the United Nations is not really able to stop genocide and war. Maybe the war can still be resolved with a ceasefire, of course to create peace on this earth. But regarding genocide, basically they didn't fight but carried out massacres, but the United Nations was unable to achieve independence in the modern era like this. But indeed,  the existence of war will clearly have an bad impact on the global economy, so of course peace will be very important to implement so that the world economy remains good.

[Baki202]

Although the war took place between two countries, its effects can be seen all over the world. For example, due to the war situation in Russia and Ukraine, it has a bad effect worldwide due to which economic crisis has occurred in various countries. Russia directly supplies many countries in the world with various raw materials for generating electricity including crude oil, but when the war between Russia and Ukraine took a terrible turn, all Russian imports and exports were stopped, but it had a negative impact on the whole world.

United Nations is there to maintain peace in the world, I think if the United Nations is serious about this, then no country may go to war. War brings only destruction, reconciliation is good not only for each other but for the whole world.

I feel we all have failed in our duty because I feel like their should be agencies that will stop the governments from going or starting war be, the war between Ukraine and Russia started long ago and both the governments have refused to back down for one another just because they both feel they have the resources to go to war with anyone. Then don’t value the conditions that they will put their people, even the money they spend because every operation during war costs money, but they still go ahead with it their plan of going to war and that is very bad of them. And Russia was having issue then with their market supply just because of the war, their is no way war will not affect a countries economy.

And I don’t know why the united nation are always finding it difficult to maintain peace I feel their should be serious penalties for going against them because even with warnings they will still want to flex muscles on one another, we just hope this whole thing will end very soon and the people that need war to be waged against is the government for their maltreatment to their citizens and not making the economy work well and embezzlement of public funds so they need war.

[serveria.com]

We can mention the war between Ukraine and Russia as a small example of this. Ukraine has suffered so much due to the war between Russia and Ukraine that we have seen one of our forum members asking for donations here to help with ambulances in Ukrainian hospitals and help the people of that country. Maybe because of the war in Ukraine, their economic situation, GDP has suffered greatly and their capital market has also suffered. Which has an impact on the citizens of their country. In war-torn countries, poor citizens suffer the most.

Russia failed to achieve significant success on the battlefield, attacking what it thought was a defenseless Ukraine and hoping to completely seize its territory within days or weeks. But this war has been going on for three years now and without significant successes for Russia. Therefore, Putin’s Russia has changed its tactics and has been shelling cities and other populated areas of Ukraine every day for a long time using all possible military means, trying to sow chaos and significant displacement of civilian refugees. Almost every day there are attacks by missiles and drones on the entire territory of Ukraine, as well as more than a hundred front-line settlements from cannon artillery.

Particularly destructive is Russia’s use of high-power corrective bombs, weighing up to a ton or more.
However, yesterday, for the first time in history, the Russian occupiers dropped an aircraft high-explosive bomb FAB-3000 M-54 weighing three tons and having a warhead of 1.2 tons on a hospital building in the village of Liptsy in the Kharkov region. The bomb fell 15 meters from the hospital building, but even in this case it caused significant damage to the building.
https://focus.ua/voennye-novosti/653414-vs-rf-vpervye-udarili-trehtonnoy-bomboy-fab-3000-po-harkovshchine-video

Yes, in your parallel universe, Russia is using it's innovative, rare, expensive weapons to target civilian targets. For some reason, I believe you (NOT!).  

Meanwhile in the real world:

* Ukraine is losing territories and troops daily. Russia is reporting about capturing new towns and villages almost every day. The number of POWs is enormous.
* Ukraine has hit a beach in Sevastopol killing and injuring hundreds, including many kids.
* Global corporations like Coca-Cola are returning to Russia (who would have thought?).

[WillyAp]

Meanwhile in the real world:

* Ukraine is losing territories and troops daily. Russia is reporting about capturing new towns and villages almost every day. The number of POWs is enormous.
* Ukraine has hit a beach in Sevastopol killing and injuring hundreds, including many kids.
* Global corporations like Coca-Cola are returning to Russia (who would have thought?).

Your parallel world is missing:

Russia too is loosing troops daily, and if Russia gains territory why is Russia not knocking on the doorsteps of Kiew? 
I missed actually the outcry when Russia hit the hospitals or kindergartens.

https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-04-06/russian-missile-strikes-in-ukraine-kill-8-and-wound-12

[Argoo]

Meanwhile in the real world:

* Ukraine is losing territories and troops daily. Russia is reporting about capturing new towns and villages almost every day. The number of POWs is enormous.
* Ukraine has hit a beach in Sevastopol killing and injuring hundreds, including many kids.
* Global corporations like Coca-Cola are returning to Russia (who would have thought?).

The Russian occupiers slowly moved deeper into the territory of Ukraine, when the Ukrainian Armed Forces had acute problems with weapons and ammunition due to the fact that the United States suspended military assistance to Ukraine for more than six months due to internal squabbles in connection with the upcoming US presidential elections. At the same time, Russia received enough drones from Iran and several million ammunition from North Korea, and Ukraine was unable to receive even half of the one million ammunition promised by the West. But now the situation at the front has already changed and parity in ammunition has been restored. In some cases, the occupiers have already howled because the Ukrainian Armed Forces are now putting up a worthy rebuff. Thus, the Russian offensive in the Kharkov direction since May 10 has not only stalled, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have successfully counterattacked and liberated the occupied territories, and the battle for the border city of Volchansk has turned into an unsuccessful attempt by the Russians to liberate part of the occupiers who were surrounded at the Volchansk Aggregate Plant.

As for the incident with four dead and about 150 wounded civilians relaxing on the beach of Sevastopol on June 23, this occurred as a result of the work of Russian air defense, and not a targeted shelling of the territory of this beach. One of the missiles, aimed at a military airfield, was shot down over the beach.

So, half an hour later, the Russian head of Sevastopol, Mikhail Razvozhaev, reported in his Telegram channel that the repulsion of the missile attack had ended: “According to preliminary information, 5 air targets were destroyed in the sky above the water area. But fragments of the downed targets fell in the coastal zone.”

The Russian Ministry of Defense also admitted that civilian casualties occurred as a result of the work of Russian air defense. “During the repulsion of a terrorist attack by air defense forces on duty, four American ATACMS missiles were shot down. Another missile, as a result of the impact of air defense systems, deviated from the flight path at the final stage and detonated the warhead in the air over the city territory,” the department said.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2024/06/23/7462166/

https://ru.krymr.com/a/sevastopol-uchkuevka-pvo-smert-plyag/33006880.html

Videos and photos show Russian troops placing military equipment near civilian targets in Crimea. In this case, Russian air defense systems were located on a hill just two kilometers from the beach. There were no means of warning about the air raid, nor any shelters. But the Russian authorities are encouraging the tourist season to Crimea from all over Russia, despite the fact that the occupied Crimean peninsula has already turned into a war zone. The civilian population is accustomed to the fact that Ukraine uses high-precision weapons to destroy only Russian military targets - airfields, air defense systems, command posts and ammunition depots, and therefore do not pay much attention to missile attacks and drone attacks. But the Ukrainian Armed Forces cannot in any way influence the situation of Russian air defense operations over beaches and other concentrations of civilians.



"

[Betwrong]

~

This war is basically an expression of Putin's arrogance which has changed the economic and geopolitical ~
NATO member states, including the United States, have imposed various sanctions against aggressive countries, but Putin is more aggressive about war. In this case, he needs to be brought under the ban in more ways so that his power gradually decreases.

That's what I'm saying. And I'm taking about economic pressure, not even military. Firstly, ban all trading with Russia. Secondly, imply harsh sanctions on those countries who helps Russia to circumvent the ban. Will it be easy for the civilized world? No. But war is never easy, and I propose although economic but still a war. There will be much less goods on your shelves, there will be less tools that you might need, but you have to fight evil. You have to.

[serveria.com]

Meanwhile in the real world:

* Ukraine is losing territories and troops daily. Russia is reporting about capturing new towns and villages almost every day. The number of POWs is enormous.
* Ukraine has hit a beach in Sevastopol killing and injuring hundreds, including many kids.
* Global corporations like Coca-Cola are returning to Russia (who would have thought?).

The Russian occupiers slowly moved deeper into the territory of Ukraine, when the Ukrainian Armed Forces had acute problems with weapons and ammunition due to the fact that the United States suspended military assistance to Ukraine for more than six months due to internal squabbles in connection with the upcoming US presidential elections. At the same time, Russia received enough drones from Iran and several million ammunition from North Korea, and Ukraine was unable to receive even half of the one million ammunition promised by the West. But now the situation at the front has already changed and parity in ammunition has been restored. In some cases, the occupiers have already howled because the Ukrainian Armed Forces are now putting up a worthy rebuff. Thus, the Russian offensive in the Kharkov direction since May 10 has not only stalled, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have successfully counterattacked and liberated the occupied territories, and the battle for the border city of Volchansk has turned into an unsuccessful attempt by the Russians to liberate part of the occupiers who were surrounded at the Volchansk Aggregate Plant.

Poor attempt to justify your below par performance on the frontline. The morale of your troops is low, your command is giving illogical, suicidal orders but who is to blame? The US and allies! Pretty convenient, isn't it? 

And perhaps you could provide some non-Ukrainian sources regarding the super successful Ukrainian counter-offensive that you mentioned?  Which towns have been recaptured? 

I told you already and I'll say it again: all the weapons of the world won't stop Russia from defeating Ukraine eventually. If I were the president of Ukraine, I'd sign a peace agreement on virtually any terms, because it's the only way to keep Ukraine's liberty, sovereignty and nation intact.

As for the incident with four dead and about 150 wounded civilians relaxing on the beach of Sevastopol on June 23, this occurred as a result of the work of Russian air defense, and not a targeted shelling of the territory of this beach. One of the missiles, aimed at a military airfield, was shot down over the beach.

Muahaha, what a deja vu! Some pages above, you were whining about Russians targeting civilian targets and I was trying to prove that's Ukrainian anti-missile defence working poorly. So, now you're in my shoes trying to prove it's not bloodthirsty Zelensky killing children but rather Russian anti-missile defence mishap. Isn't that ironic, troll?     

Videos and photos show Russian troops placing military equipment near civilian targets in Crimea. In this case, Russian air defense systems were located on a hill just two kilometers from the beach.

Perhaps you could share these "videos and photos" with us? From reputable international sources of course, not some Ukrainian propaganda media shitholes. 

But the Ukrainian Armed Forces cannot in any way influence the situation of Russian air defense operations over beaches and other concentrations of civilians.

In fact they can! How about not attacking peaceful cities which pose no threat to AFU? 

[mehmetosman89]

Of course there is truth in what you describe. But an increase in national GDP is possible in some cases, especially if the country obtains arms purchase contracts from other countries. The most felt negative impact is for countries involved in war, while other countries actually benefit from the war.
Oil is a very important resource in the modern era, not only during times of conflict. Because all transportation uses oil, and we can calculate how many transportation there are currently in the world. However, war is a factor in fluctuations in world oil prices.

Weapons factories also need oil when making any production for war needs and this is clearly felt by all countries that have weapons factories so that petroleum is not only used for transportation. Apart from that, electric transportation manufacturers also need more oil as their energy source because without oil, they cannot produce electric transportation equipment such as motorbikes and cars. Meanwhile, in the war sector, oil is also used for jet aircraft and warships, so the impact on the price of oil itself also has very unstable fluctuations in the market.

[Argoo]

* Ukraine has hit a beach in Sevastopol killing and injuring hundreds, including many kids.

It is not Ukraine that violates the rights of civilians living on the Russian-occupied Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, but Russia.

On Tuesday, June 25, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) announced a decision on the merits in the first interstate case in the ECHR “Ukraine v. Russia” regarding Crimea, recognizing the existence of systematic violations of human rights in the occupied peninsula by the aggressor country since 2014.

The ECtHR unanimously found that Ukraine proved the existence of administrative practices on the part of Russia:

- Disappearances and the lack of an effective investigation in this regard under Article 2 of the Convention;
- ill-treatment and unlawful detention under articles 3 and 5 of the Convention;
- Illegal dissemination of Russian legislation, as a result of which the courts in Crimea cannot be considered established in accordance with the law, under Article 6;
- Forced change of Ukrainian citizenship to Russian under Article 8 of the Convention;
- Systematic mass searches in violation of Article 8;
- Forced transfer of convicts to the territory of the Russian Federation in violation of Article 8;
- Attacks and persecution of religious leaders who did not belong to the Russian Orthodox Church, searches and confiscation of property in this regard, in violation of Article 9;
- Closure of non-Russian media, including Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar television stations, constant harassment and attacks on journalists in violation of Article 10;
Prohibition of peaceful assemblies and protests and attacks and persecution of their organizers in violation of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Expropriation of private property in violation of Article 1 of the First Protocol;
- Closure of Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar classes contrary to Article 2 of the First Protocol;
- Violation of the right to freedom of movement between the occupied territory of Crimea and the mainland of Ukraine;
- Discrimination against Crimean Tatars;
- Violation of the rights of political prisoners, the impossibility of their return to Ukraine and cruel treatment of them in the occupied Crimea and the territory of the Russian Federation.
https://nv.ua/world/geopolitics/razgromnoe-reshenie-dlya-rf-espch-vynes-verdikt-po-delu-ukraina-protiv-rossii-po-krymu-50429951.html

In addition, on June 25, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for ex-Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and the head of the Russian General Staff Valery Gerasimov in connection with attacks on the energy infrastructure of Ukraine and harm to civilians and relate to events that took place from October 10, 2022 to at least March 9, 2023, as well as for war crimes of causing excessive incidental harm to the civilian population or damage to civilian objects. In addition, they are suspected of a crime against humanity “in the form of inhumane acts.”
https://www.bbc.com/russian/articles/cy008y2nny1o

https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/derzhdepi-ssha-vidreaguvali-vidachu-mks-orderiv-1719368764.html

Ukraine is documenting the war crimes of the Putin regime in Ukraine and the perpetrators will eventually receive the punishment they deserve.

[Bright0515]

In the old days basically it was farming, that was their means for survival they do not rely on industrial products they have all it takes to survive in hard times the only negative impact it has on them is restriction from reaching out to your farm.
But in this modern days life, we can see that there are no wars but the economy is still not functioning well talk more of of when wars are fought regularly it won't be a nice one because it's just hunger that would kill most people most people who have their own businesses would witness shortage, goods would get damaged, while some as a result of the war may lose their business places.

Then another factor to consider is why the war was fought? If the war was fought for the betterment of the economy and at last victorious yes things would be damaged but at last the economy will get better.
So war has to be classified in this two ways to label if the economy will be bad or good that's my contribution thank you.

[Argoo]

 Ukraine has hit a beach in Sevastopol killing and injuring hundreds, including many kids.

In the case of the death of civilians on the beach of Sevastopol, one more important point should be taken into account. International law, it turns out, does not protect Russian civilians if they are in the occupied territory of Ukraine - in Crimea, Donbass or in other Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine.

The only document protecting the rights of citizens during war is the Geneva Convention of 1949, which also regulates the protection of citizens in occupied territories. According to this convention, citizens of all countries except the aggressor country are protected. That is, Russian citizens are not protected by international conventions while in Crimea.

This is why the Ukrainian army has the right to destroy Russian civilians in Crimea without taking into account their interests. For example, if there are 100 Russian citizens and one military man on the beach, the Ukrainian military has the right to launch missile attacks there.

Ukraine has long warned Russian citizens not to come to the occupied territory of Ukraine, because fighting is taking place almost everywhere there. If Russia encourages their arrival, then it is Russia that is responsible for their safety and their death from hostilities.