What is this from? I'm assuming it's from OgNasty's defense that his lawyer filed?
8.)
As the Defendant had already been well-known in the cryptocurrency industry and was known to financially support and promote smaller cryptocurrency forums, the Plaintiff and the Defendant had discussions pertaining to the Defendant providing the Plaintiff with monetary support for his website.If it is, what the flying fuck is this bullshit? Weasle needs a new lawyer, ASAP.
____________
There's several things wrong with it and what it's implications are:
As the Defendant had already been well-known in the cryptocurrency industryLol, wut??? Bit flattering on the "well-known" aren't we? Individuals most people would consider well-known are people like satoshi, Vitalik, Greg Maxwell, and Wei Dai. You know, people that anyone can name off the top of their head because of their massive achievements. Who the fuck are you? What the fuck have you achieved? You're just some finance-bro at the end of the day. I'm telling you, and I'm being respectfully honest here,
no one gives a flying fuck that Grok thinks you're "Crypto Royalty". No one cares about your shitty coins, your shitty history as treasurer, your shitty mining, your shitty escrow service, and your relationship with theymos. No. One. Cares. Get the fuck off your highhorse, and stop letting your attorney huff the fumes of your ego.
and was known to financially support and promote smaller cryptocurrency forumsAgain, HUH? When has he
ever supported
anything that could even be
remotely classified as a "smaller cryptocurrency forum"? He has like
one mention of Altcoinstalks in his entire post history, and it's of him downplaying it as a refugee for people who support "money laundering". As for r/btc and Reddit as a whole, he has been permanently
banned on there. Where else is he supporting smaller crypto-forums? This is the only one he talks about/frequents, and he's been dogging on it in the meta and reputation section for
years now. Even his posts about altcoins themselves in a vaccum tell a story of someone who is clearly a bitcoin maxamalist, and views them nothing more than casino credits. Definitely not active in any altcoin communities.
____________
Finally, the combination of this first half of section 8:
As the Defendant had already been well-known in the cryptocurrency industry and was known to financially support and promote smaller cryptocurrency forumsAnd this second half of section 8:
the Plaintiff and the Defendant had discussions pertaining to the Defendant providing the Plaintiff with monetary support for his website.Doesn't sit well with me. What the fuck is the implication of BPIP here? Is his lawyer trying to say BPIP is a "smaller cryptocurrency forum"? The first half and second half of section 8 are definitely painting that picture. BPIP is not even a forum. It's a data aggregation site to be used as a tool for forum users.
____________
Is there a way we can see the full Plaintiff and full Defense filing documents? All sections, side-by-side?
@Vod, if they are available for purchase please do link it here so someone can buy them and we can get a thread going comparing the two. Initially, I didn't care. Mostly because we all know who's getting their asshole reamed in the courtroom when the time comes...
...but after reading Section 8. Holy fuck. I gotta see what the idiot OgNasty hired has cooked up.
OgNasty is a habitual liar and there is a greater chance he would be labelled a sex offender than have this case thrown out.
Never say never:
theymos is doing a good job it is not easy to operate in the USA. 🇺🇸 laws are fucked up.
Here is a simple example you are 18 your girlfriend is 17 you drive over the george washington bridge while she is giving you a handjob. On one side of the bridge you are not a pedophile on the other side of the bridge you are a pedophile. Age of consent is 17 in NY and 18 in NJ.
Directions to this bridge? Kidding…