What do you want to see in casino reviews?

[cafter]

snip

it's obvious that if casino will play their players or any random people to review their casino then they will write good review of them.
so we cannot trust those review but here on bitcointalk gamblingbro have their website: gamblingbro.com
they have tested mostly reputable casinos by depositing and withdrawing real money/crypto. also there is a review campaign where we get $5 for a review on their site.
there are many reviews are written by BTT users so i think we can trust those review because they didn't written because of pressure, check the thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382433.0

[Unsoldier]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

[masulum]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

All review websites, not just casinos, currently lack the trust of their readers. Because, we all know, many companies use review websites that pay influencers or fake accounts to provide positive reviews of a company. However, sometimes even though they are paid, influencers provide neutral reviews of the company, they can even provide critical reviews, this is actually good, because it will be more organic. If everyone gives positive reviews, it seems hard to believe. However, that doesn't mean I'm against reviews. The Bitcointalk forum is a place for me to see organic reviews of new casinos that join the forum and more trusted since review from users is real, even we can find some of paid review, many criticized given by members, that why here I can find a realistic reviews from every companies.

[Bushdark]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

Casino review should be an eye opener about the casino in particular. Many things needed to be known about a casino through review and not just praising the casino of it wonderful features and characteristics that makes it different from others in same competition.
There is competition in casino business that we as future users would want to see some certain things about the casino that would give us an edge over the ones we are using presently with good and interesting features.

[SamReomo]

Casino review should be an eye opener about the casino in particular. Many things needed to be known about a casino through review and not just praising the casino of it wonderful features and characteristics that makes it different from others in same competition.

As a reviewer I can probably say that when a casino has some features then testing those features and writing them in the review is the responsibility of the reviewer. I also try to test the weak points of a casino and try my best to recommend the casino owner to fix those weak points in order to succeed in casino business.

All of the casinos are there to satisfy their players and they do that in order to earn money for them as well, and if a casino lacks customer support or any other features then it's responsibility of the reviewer to highlight that issue in the review so casino can fix that issue and players will get some knowledge about that issue before going with that casino.

[asyakashi]

The main thing I see from casino reviews is how the website can last for years. This is real proof of how a casino site can really build on its fundamentals and its community is always happy with what is offered to their community. This is what made me want to play at that place. For me, the age of the crypto site determines the best quality of the casino website that I can play on. I feel it's fairer to play there.

[michellee]

Some gambling platform are opening paid review and many of participants don't know detail with the gambling platform review most of them providing review for earning the money. Some paid review with gambling platform actually take points on positive review if participants want to earn money or getting their payment and doubt with honest review like give some experience face difficult withdrawing their money there will get their payment or not.

You right if want get honest review not see on outside review from some gambling platform, check detail on their ANN tread or looking the social media account from gambling platform how many people get problem with their account withdrawal and there are always has positive and negative viewed from some gambling platform.

There's no doubt about that, especially if you read the reviews from sites outside this forum. That is why we have to be very careful in looking for information. If we are in doubt, it is better to skip it and continue looking from other sites. But if you are still unsure, you can ask via this forum.

The members on this forum already have a lot of experience playing gambling in many casinos. They will provide reviews and their gambling experience at the casino that you want to know. And their reviews can be a consideration for us when choosing a casino. But that doesn't mean we can immediately accept the advice, we have to keep looking for other information.

We decide which casino we want to gamble at, not just because of suggestions from friends here. We want to find a casino, so we have to be able to find a casino that can make us feel comfortable when we are there.

[paxmao]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

Not all of them are biased or paid for, but I reckon that there is a point on the issue of of who evaluates the evaluator on this. It is a question of having some of the users sign off a review, so the rest may know who is behind the result of backing the review. Older users, well known in the forum or with good reputation are a sign for those looking for a solid review, non-paid.

[Oilacris]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

Not all of them are biased or paid for, but I reckon that there is a point on the issue of of who evaluates the evaluator on this. It is a question of having some of the users sign off a review, so the rest may know who is behind the result of backing the review. Older users, well known in the forum or with good reputation are a sign for those looking for a solid review, non-paid.

Just like for example BTCGOSU which we do know that its owner or creator is one of the known and reputable member of this forum on which we can really assure about its legitimacy or precision
when it comes to gambling site reviews and even on having some guides on which it is really that something worth to look upon. You could really be able to tell that when it comes to reviews
then there's overall transaparency and accuracy into those things mentioned on which it is really that hard to ignore that those are good reviews which it would really be worth to read up
if you are that someone whose really that loving on reading up some site reviews but most of the time, people doesnt really care on reading up reviews as long they would be just simply stick
into those known and reputable ones then theyre good to go.

[komisariatku]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

Not all of them are biased or paid for, but I reckon that there is a point on the issue of of who evaluates the evaluator on this. It is a question of having some of the users sign off a review, so the rest may know who is behind the result of backing the review. Older users, well known in the forum or with good reputation are a sign for those looking for a solid review, non-paid.

Whether admit it or not, sometimes I suspect they might be paid to give a good review of one of the casinos. This happens because we don't know who is judging and their review site doesn't have clear names of judges. Plus, I also don't know if they actually try to play at the casinos they review or just rewrite what the casino says.

Even so, sometimes I still read casino review sites because in some ways they are still quite helpful and sometimes I look for the best promos among existing casinos through casino review sites.

[agustina2]

Whether admit it or not, sometimes I suspect they might be paid to give a good review of one of the casinos. This happens because we don't know who is judging and their review site doesn't have clear names of judges. Plus, I also don't know if they actually try to play at the casinos they review or just rewrite what the casino says.

Regarding that specific issue concerning about being paid or not, I doubt that most good reviews are paid. The promoted site itself might not even recognize or know some of the game review sites. Generally speaking, most review sites need to have a good set of reviews shown on their site as they are also marketing their affiliate link. Referrals are required to have a real deposit on that site before the commission will be received by the promoter.

If these review sites lure their visitors to a bad site, then they are just wasting time on managing their review sites. What's the sense?

[EarnOnVictor]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

I like the fact that you make it known that you stand to be corrected, and I would like to say that it is not all review sites that are paid. You can actually know or suspect the ones that have been paid, it could be cleared with the way they make the review and list the casinos reviewed. This is why I do not go for Google's "Best" searches again, you will hardly see the truth in that and the so-called "Best" might be the "Worst". You can avoid the ones that are personally reviewed by the site owners, they are 99.90% likely to have been paid, and some that are not paid directly would have their affiliation with the casinos.

I see a whole lot of them and I will never for the review of a site open with any company, it is the best way to fall victim easily. But there are many sites that have people's reviews and not the site owner's reviews. I don't think you can make a mistake with that, yet one has to read insightfully to know the real reviews by people as users also can fake it, and be more careful to know if the site is not compromising the reviews. Lastly, you can do your own review on the site and see how the review would be published. For me, I know this kind of review is somewhat better.

[mak013]

The main thing I see from casino reviews is how the website can last for years. This is real proof of how a casino site can really build on its fundamentals and its community is always happy with what is offered to their community. This is what made me want to play at that place. For me, the age of the crypto site determines the best quality of the casino website that I can play on. I feel it's fairer to play there.

It doesn`t give any guarantee. The site can be sold, it can be paid for several years and doesn`t use, etc. The owners can cheat a bit for a long time. Of course it is better to see that the site works for the years, but i`d prefer to make some additional research. And it wouldn`t be any review site.

[shasan]

Many platform casino review source not from real gambler and most of them paid for reviewing their platform, I agree with you more interested looking for casino review from real gambler and they have experienced before with that casino between positive and negative viewed.

The review site not taking real reviews from real gamblers even if they are posting/buying positive reviews from review/content writers. As a result, the new gambler even a lot of old gamblers become confused about which to use and which is a lot. And as a result, the gambler becomes a loser for the scam activity of the so-called scam activity of the gambling site.

[Lida93]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

Do you want the reviews to be as short as possible or that they should be of honesty without biases  You know they can still be short and bias.

We know that most of these reviews we see online about casinos many are paid reviews which are made to portray a good and reputable name to the respective casino's, nevertheless there are a few among those paid reviews that are made by honest users who based on their experience with the casino poured out their mind as it is without bias which is why I would encourage you to try read reviews about a casino before making use of it for you might extract some atom of truth from one honest review among many bias reviews. Just jumping into a casino site trying everything blindly can be risky as you may not be privy to the real deal not until you had made a deposit there and then some hidden terms would now be revealed.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

         -   Of course, what is usually normal that we always want to see in a casino where we will try to gamble is that, as much as possible, we cannot read any issues here that are the experiences of their users who have complained about their platform. Because this is an advantage that we immediately trust.

Moreover, what some people said in this section is also correct: observe and learn to read first before trying to enter a large amount of money so that you or we don't get into trouble in the end if we ever play on a gambling platform, and above all, learn to read the gambling TOS that the casino also has.

[Odusko]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

All review websites, not just casinos, currently lack the trust of their readers. Because, we all know, many companies use review websites that pay influencers or fake accounts to provide positive reviews of a company. However, sometimes even though they are paid, influencers provide neutral reviews of the company, they can even provide critical reviews, this is actually good, because it will be more organic. If everyone gives positive reviews, it seems hard to believe. However, that doesn't mean I'm against reviews. The Bitcointalk forum is a place for me to see organic reviews of new casinos that join the forum and more trusted since review from users is real, even we can find some of paid review, many criticized given by members, that why here I can find a realistic reviews from every companies.

I believe when the ops mentioned reviews here in thos context meant forum reviews and not any other form of third parties review sites, this is exclusively why we make some references to what we expected to see from those who constantly post and make reviews for casinos.
One of the features that members have made reference to mostly is the issues of withdrawal and deposits, and how fast the casino is with taking care of issues as their arises along the way, for a perfectly made reviews, their must contain some elements of what have been mentioned above to satisfy gambler's desire of what their expect to see from a casino.

[Dunamisx]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

You could actually be right and also be wrong to an extent, we cannot perfectly predict on reviews received on the internet, but as a matter of fact, we can also consider the ones here as being honest because they are being reviewed by most trusted members of the forum and the gambling platforms are taking them seriously to effectively implement all that had been observed or introduced.

[iv4n]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

You could actually be right and also be wrong to an extent, we cannot perfectly predict on reviews received on the internet, but as a matter of fact, we can also consider the ones here as being honest because they are being reviewed by most trusted members of the forum and the gambling platforms are taking them seriously to effectively implement all that had been observed or introduced.

Well, I like that approach, if you wish to play in a casino and check it out just register and do it. But what is good about casino reviews is that we can get familiar with some casino features and rules before we register and start reading ToS and looking at what kind of promotions & bonuses and wagering requirements. A good casino review site has all that in one place, it can save us some time and money...

We have a good casino review site here on the forum, Efi is a trusted member of this community who has huge gambling experience.

[EarnOnVictor]

I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.

You could actually be right and also be wrong to an extent, we cannot perfectly predict on reviews received on the internet, but as a matter of fact, we can also consider the ones here as being honest because they are being reviewed by most trusted members of the forum and the gambling platforms are taking them seriously to effectively implement all that had been observed or introduced.

You have a good point there, we should never trust any website, especially those casinos that are not being reviewed by users but the operators. And if they are being reviewed by supposed people, how are we sure that they are true human beings and not bots? Peradventure if they are not bots, how are we sure that they are not paid to make the reviews? We should trust nothing online these days, not even the handles of our trusted netizens, they could have been paid as well. But in forums like this and a few other websites where people are reviewing, you can know the genuine ones and the fake ones, and even if you can't know it all, you will know it to some extent that you will be able to trust it to a reasonable extent. Above all, forums are the best places to read the true reviews of things, and if the forum is a long lasting one with track records, you do not have anything to worry about as most of the reviews would be genuine.