Rich or poor gambler, who should risk more?

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

But don't you think weather remaining calm either as a poor or rich person is a product of how much such individual gambled it, because you just can't expect a rich man who earns $1000 monthly and gambled $10 on a bet and lost it to worry, unlike a poor man who earns $50 monthly and then went and gamble same $10 not to be madly worry about his lose, because just as $10 is 1% of $1000, if the same poor man gambles same 1% of his income, which is $0.5 and lost it.. Do you think such poor man will be angry?

[1715583712]

1715583712

[1715583712]

1715583712

[1715583712]

1715583712

[junder]

Such things have made the low rollers to try mimicking the wagering style of the high rollers, and it affects them a lot. Gamblers deserve to focus and make the best strategy for them, to stay responsible. Not being bothered of taking risks or not. Gambling is risk.

This is one of the most dangerous parts of online gambling. People tend to follow streamers who stream their big wins and their viewers join those platforms using those streamer's affiliate links and try the same strategy. But, as we know, a strategy never works for everyone. We cannot copy others' strategies to change our luck. Everyone has different types of expertise in different games.

If a gambler with $100 tries to follow another streamer who has nearly a hundred thousand dollar bankroll, surely they will lose the money within a few minutes. The shocking things is, most streamers play with fake money.

What you say is correct, even if we follow the strategy of the streamers it will not produce the same events, if indeed the streamers always win with the gambling they do, in my opinion it is just a trick to attract a lot of people's interest in gambling with using the link they provide, with that they can make a profit too, and if the streamers always win with their gambling, it could be that they are collaborating with a gambling industry company whose goal is as I said above.

That's the technique for getting more traffic, which affects the bank roll of the low roller. Moving forward the player begins to lay blames on the streamers for being the reason why they lost all their funds, gambling. It then starts to affect the emotional state of the gambler that he'd begin to lose control and get problem in his gambling process. However, when a high roller is watching a streamer play, he could be following his moves without much problem because the high rollers has the sufficient funds to take care of himself, without running broke. The low rollers, find it so hard as the money is needed to solve other financial responsibilities. So, the viewers who has enough money can play like the streamers, while those who don't have enough should focus in saving up money for other things. It's wrong to go short of money, due to gambling.

that's true, it could happen, with the fact that the strategy given by the streamers and them imitating it ultimately only leads them to defeat, maybe they will blame the streamer, but that's no use, what is clear is that it can trigger their emotions increase which could make them have a grudge against gambling which could also trigger them to big losses, because with the grudge they have it can make them lose self-control which leads them to take actions that are beyond the limits such as depositing money back in pursuit of winnings.

Sometimes it is true that if someone has lost self-control because of the gambling they do, they may gamble using money that they should not use for gambling, for example money that is designated for basic needs, this can happen, because heightened emotions make it possible They will continue to gamble with the aim of getting a win that can cover the losses they have experienced.

[Fundamentals Of]

snip

snip

snip

Poor people have different views about gambling as they think that it is the last option for them to improve. Even though they only have a small income, they still manage to spend money on gambling. It is an unfortunate decision but I understand them because even if they work hard, it won't change their status instantly. But having tried into gambling, if they are too lucky, this would change everything. It was just believing into a very slim chance in life but who knows? Their decision looks so wrong but can't judge them either as they also have reasons of doing this.

It's a sad reality that many people resort to gambling as a way to escape financial difficulties. They spend whatever little money they have and hope for luck to bring them a better life. We can't blame them for this desperate measure, as they often have no other means of earning money. And then, some people become so focused on gambling and try to make it their source of income that they ignore the risks involved.

I think this is irresponsibility with a certain amount of laziness and a feeling of helplessness as well. If we can't blame them for wasting whatever little money they have, who will take the blame?

Of course we can't blame the poor people for wishing to have an abundant life. We can't blame them for dreaming to have a nice house, a car, good food, regular vacation, etc. I also dream of that kind of life.

But if you want everything to happen in an instant, and in the process don't send your children to school because instead of giving them pocket money you use it to buy lottery tickets, you are irresponsible. You may say it is for them that you badly want to have a nice life, but you are doing it wrong.

[wxa7115]

Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?

No one should use gambling in the way you are proposing, the rich simply by virtue of having more money to their name can afford to risk more money, but this should not be done with the expectation to somehow earn more money than what they wager.

The poor on the other hand are in an even more compromised situation and they should limit as much as possible the amount they spend while gambling, since even if I consider it a harmless hobby for those that are in control of their emotions and have good management skills, at the same time I understand that only a moment of weakness is needed for this to change.

[wakier]

What is the main reason you say poor people take higher risks than rich people? In fact, they are at the same risk of bankruptcy, if in games rich people tend to use big bets and poor people tend to use small bets, so what differentiates them?
For me, they only differ nominally when gambling

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

That's the only difference? Isn't it the same thing that is risky for poor gamblers because they don't have big finances like rich gamblers so this really affects them because they might have difficulty managing their finances. While rich gamblers like you said they are calmer because the expenses used for gambling are not too influential because they still have a lot of money, the risk is that if they spend too much money on gambling they will go bankrupt but if they use it appropriately then it is not too risky for rich gamblers.

[LUCKMCFLY]

What is the main reason you say poor people take higher risks than rich people? In fact, they are at the same risk of bankruptcy, if in games rich people tend to use big bets and poor people tend to use small bets, so what differentiates them?
For me, they only differ nominally when gambling

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

It is like this, primarily there are two types of people according to their financial quality, some because they do not have that much capacity, it is obvious that they are affected when they lose money in the game because it has a very abrupt impact on their life, in the professional sense I am a person who has a lot to do with this case, I have friends of all kinds, some of them are very wealthy, and when I Showed them the casino, they loved it and they weren't afraid of losing $1k, $2k or change if I played and I lose 100usd and I cry lol, but they don't , they have another perspective on life and well their basic life capabilities are completely covered, in life, in health, in everything that a person can sustain in order to survive, they do it has plenty, so losing that money doesn't concern them at all, I think that things are like that, because they basically don't care, but a poor person, or a middle class person, has to resort to, 'I don't know can afford to lose so much.

So one of the best strategies that I discovered thanks to Trading and that applies to the poor, the middle class and even the poor, which is that before playing, they allocate a budget ready to lose, when they have it, they have to know that if they lose that money because you do not have to put more money or make deposits, because that is the main rule, repeat the balance and if you lose, then it will be play another time, I mean days, months, whatever, but not in that moment, because that is the start of bad decisions, the direct path to a worst addiction and that is something that goes against the main rules for us not to have a healthy economy.

This is something I discovered in trading, and when it happens I don't do it anymore because I'm not seeing the market in the right way That applies here to games of chance, casinos, among others to avoid serious prioblastism.

[Dewi Aries]

What is the main reason you say poor people take higher risks than rich people? In fact, they are at the same risk of bankruptcy, if in games rich people tend to use big bets and poor people tend to use small bets, so what differentiates them?
For me, they only differ nominally when gambling

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

That's the only difference? Isn't it the same thing that is risky for poor gamblers because they don't have big finances like rich gamblers so this really affects them because they might have difficulty managing their finances. While rich gamblers like you said they are calmer because the expenses used for gambling are not too influential because they still have a lot of money, the risk is that if they spend too much money on gambling they will go bankrupt but if they use it appropriately then it is not too risky for rich gamblers.

Of course, it is clear that poor people are at much greater risk than rich people, one of the reasons is because poor people have low finances which when they become one of the impulsive gamblers then obviously they will more quickly experience adverse effects such as experiencing difficulties in making ends meet because of gambling in an excessive or inadvisable way. The truth is that whether you are a poor gambler or a rich one, you can still end up with the same impact and maybe the difference is in terms of time, rich people have a pretty good financial level so they still have time to come to their senses and change their gambling methods for the better before they end up losing everything, and the difference with poor people is obviously you have also said that poor people will feel the bad impact of losing money faster. So basically I think for the issue of the possibility of impact, both have the same chance but maybe the difference is in terms of time.

[Quidat]

What is the main reason you say poor people take higher risks than rich people? In fact, they are at the same risk of bankruptcy, if in games rich people tend to use big bets and poor people tend to use small bets, so what differentiates them?
For me, they only differ nominally when gambling

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

That's the only difference? Isn't it the same thing that is risky for poor gamblers because they don't have big finances like rich gamblers so this really affects them because they might have difficulty managing their finances. While rich gamblers like you said they are calmer because the expenses used for gambling are not too influential because they still have a lot of money, the risk is that if they spend too much money on gambling they will go bankrupt but if they use it appropriately then it is not too risky for rich gamblers.

It would really be that obvious that rich gamblers would really be having the chance on having those kind of versatility since they do have the money that they could spend up more.
The only issue on here is that the more the money that they could spend then the deeper the losses on which it comes worst then it would really be that ending
for you to be totally wrecked up. Actually there's no exemption when it comes on getting those huge losses in gambling. This is why it would really be that best that you should
really know on when to stop and having those limitations and those moderation when you do gamble because once you do lost that control then you would be ending up
miserable in gambling.

[EarnOnVictor]

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

But don't you think weather remaining calm either as a poor or rich person is a product of how much such individual gambled it, because you just can't expect a rich man who earns $1000 monthly and gambled $10 on a bet and lost it to worry, unlike a poor man who earns $50 monthly and then went and gamble same $10 not to be madly worry about his lose, because just as $10 is 1% of $1000, if the same poor man gambles same 1% of his income, which is $0.5 and lost it.. Do you think such poor man will be angry?

You have a point there, but first, I still do not categorise the person earning barely $1,000 rich, but the way you relate that money with betting is quite fair and understood. If one is earning $1,000 and risks $10 out of it for gambling, that means the person is risking just 1% of his earnings. This can't in any way affect the person much. Unless such is risking it over and over again when losing, but if the 1% is the monthly budget for gambling, and such which the person adheres strictly to, then it will not in a way affect him and he will be gambling reasonably and not with emotion. As a matter of fact, the person who could be using 1% of his total earnings to gamble has already concluded in his mind that he is not making wealth out of gambling, if not, more money would have been committed to it than that, and I am talking of at least 10% of his monthly income.

But not doing that means that such is gambling with the amount of money he can afford to lose, and this also means that there is less hassle and desperation to gambling and making money through it, which is the best practice that can make gamblers stay responsible and also not get addicted to it. But for the poor who earn less and gamble more, it is an issue, there is no way such will not want to make money through gambling by all means (desperation), and that mindset alone is enough to kill the account of the gambler and make him reckless at the same time. Above all, since the rich will make more money than the poor and still have enough to fall back on when they lose, they will always have a better mindset towards gambling, and hence, better gamblers than the poor in my opinion.

[slapper]

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

But don't you think weather remaining calm either as a poor or rich person is a product of how much such individual gambled it, because you just can't expect a rich man who earns $1000 monthly and gambled $10 on a bet and lost it to worry, unlike a poor man who earns $50 monthly and then went and gamble same $10 not to be madly worry about his lose, because just as $10 is 1% of $1000, if the same poor man gambles same 1% of his income, which is $0.5 and lost it.. Do you think such poor man will be angry?

You have a point there, but first, I still do not categorise the person earning barely $1,000 rich, but the way you relate that money with betting is quite fair and understood. If one is earning $1,000 and risks $10 out of it for gambling, that means the person is risking just 1% of his earnings. This can't in any way affect the person much. Unless such is risking it over and over again when losing, but if the 1% is the monthly budget for gambling, and such which the person adheres strictly to, then it will not in a way affect him and he will be gambling reasonably and not with emotion. As a matter of fact, the person who could be using 1% of his total earnings to gamble has already concluded in his mind that he is not making wealth out of gambling, if not, more money would have been committed to it than that, and I am talking of at least 10% of his monthly income.

But not doing that means that such is gambling with the amount of money he can afford to lose, and this also means that there is less hassle and desperation to gambling and making money through it, which is the best practice that can make gamblers stay responsible and also not get addicted to it. But for the poor who earn less and gamble more, it is an issue, there is no way such will not want to make money through gambling by all means (desperation), and that mindset alone is enough to kill the account of the gambler and make him reckless at the same time. Above all, since the rich will make more money than the poor and still have enough to fall back on when they lose, they will always have a better mindset towards gambling, and hence, better gamblers than the poor in my opinion.

It doesn't seem bad to spend 1% of a low income on gambling. The tip of the iceberg is missed in your analysis. What matters is the habit it creates, not the percentage. Even with a 1% responsible restriction, gambling can get out of hand. Why? Human psychology. The gambler's fallacy and confirmation bias don't care about your 1%. Once the win or loss hits, reasoning disappears. Understanding gambling is about understanding the beast, not wealth. Best practice? Set aside gambling from your life, not 1%. Financial literacy and emotional control are more important than responsible money loss

[Weawant]

That's the only difference? Isn't it the same thing that is risky for poor gamblers because they don't have big finances like rich gamblers so this really affects them because they might have difficulty managing their finances. While rich gamblers like you said they are calmer because the expenses used for gambling are not too influential because they still have a lot of money, the risk is that if they spend too much money on gambling they will go bankrupt but if they use it appropriately then it is not too risky for rich gamblers.

Some times the difference is the fact that the poor doesn't have that much to risk and that's why it would want to look like that which the poor is risking is small but is we should look at it by the percentage of their worth it may turn out that the poor are even risking more because since their funds is small, a percentage of it could mean their betting bankroll.

The Rich gamblers if they should risk the same percentage some poor risk on gambling, I'm very sure a few of the rich gamblers may go bankrupt Sooner than they can imagine, but because this poor gamblers some times are just desperate and want to just make money gambling, they do not even consider this that much they just keep gambling till they finally exhaust their bankroll then they return to the casino the next day on a new bankroll, both rich and poor should always try to make sure they don't risk more than they can afford to lose so they can be on the safe side of gambling.

[gunhell16]

snip

snip

snip

Poor people have different views about gambling as they think that it is the last option for them to improve. Even though they only have a small income, they still manage to spend money on gambling. It is an unfortunate decision but I understand them because even if they work hard, it won't change their status instantly. But having tried into gambling, if they are too lucky, this would change everything. It was just believing into a very slim chance in life but who knows? Their decision looks so wrong but can't judge them either as they also have reasons of doing this.

It's a sad reality that many people resort to gambling as a way to escape financial difficulties. They spend whatever little money they have and hope for luck to bring them a better life. We can't blame them for this desperate measure, as they often have no other means of earning money. And then, some people become so focused on gambling and try to make it their source of income that they ignore the risks involved.

I think this is irresponsibility with a certain amount of laziness and a feeling of helplessness as well. If we can't blame them for wasting whatever little money they have, who will take the blame?

Of course we can't blame the poor people for wishing to have an abundant life. We can't blame them for dreaming to have a nice house, a car, good food, regular vacation, etc. I also dream of that kind of life.

But if you want everything to happen in an instant, and in the process don't send your children to school because instead of giving them pocket money you use it to buy lottery tickets, you are irresponsible. You may say it is for them that you badly want to have a nice life, but you are doing it wrong.

Aren't slot games also luck-dependent, right? Even if it's just a newbie who enters here when they are lucky, they can immediately experience a big win when they bet a large amount, and they will be lucky in gambling.

Slot games don't need skills either, right? Because if you just bet, then it will roll out the game while you watch it if you win or lose,
isn't that right?

[hedgeh0g]

That's the only difference? Isn't it the same thing that is risky for poor gamblers because they don't have big finances like rich gamblers so this really affects them because they might have difficulty managing their finances. While rich gamblers like you said they are calmer because the expenses used for gambling are not too influential because they still have a lot of money, the risk is that if they spend too much money on gambling they will go bankrupt but if they use it appropriately then it is not too risky for rich gamblers.

Some times the difference is the fact that the poor doesn't have that much to risk and that's why it would want to look like that which the poor is risking is small but is we should look at it by the percentage of their worth it may turn out that the poor are even risking more because since their funds is small, a percentage of it could mean their betting bankroll.

The Rich gamblers if they should risk the same percentage some poor risk on gambling, I'm very sure a few of the rich gamblers may go bankrupt Sooner than they can imagine, but because this poor gamblers some times are just desperate and want to just make money gambling, they do not even consider this that much they just keep gambling till they finally exhaust their bankroll then they return to the casino the next day on a new bankroll, both rich and poor should always try to make sure they don't risk more than they can afford to lose so they can be on the safe side of gambling.

Yes, but the poor can lose everything, and it will be less in absolute terms than the rich. Therefore, a poor person can afford to lose a lot and his life will not change radically after this. The most important point here is that the poor must have at least minimally basic needs covered. I have no doubt that in 1 or 2 years he will be able to earn money for himself again and he will most likely return to the game to try to change his life again if luck chooses him. A rich person will need much more time if he loses so much that he will only have time for basic needs. He will have to rebuild the business or invest again, and this will take 5 or 10 years, or maybe more. In general, I am at great risk, there is nothing good in my opinion, whether the player is poor or rich.

[Coin_trader]

Yes, but the poor can lose everything, and it will be less in absolute terms than the rich. Therefore, a poor person can afford to lose a lot and his life will not change radically after this. The most important point here is that the poor must have at least minimally basic needs covered. I have no doubt that in 1 or 2 years he will be able to earn money for himself again and he will most likely return to the game to try to change his life again if luck chooses him. A rich person will need much more time if he loses so much that he will only have time for basic needs. He will have to rebuild the business or invest again, and this will take 5 or 10 years, or maybe more. In general, I am at great risk, there is nothing good in my opinion, whether the player is poor or rich.

Definitely not true. You are considering only the literal value of the bankroll between the poor and rich that’s why your idea turns out like this. But a 100$ of poor is almost equivalent to 1M of rich if both this amount is equal percentage to their total money in their savings.

So there’s no way a poor can still be in good if he lose all of his money even though it’s small in value because that’s everything for him. A million dollar lose of a millionaire with a billion dollar funds is not that painful compared to a poor losing 100$ while it’s his last piece of his money since his salary is too low to save anything big.

[Westinhome]

Some times the difference is the fact that the poor doesn't have that much to risk and that's why it would want to look like that which the poor is risking is small but is we should look at it by the percentage of their worth it may turn out that the poor are even risking more because since their funds is small, a percentage of it could mean their betting bankroll.

The money was the difference between the rich and poor gamblers.The poor don’t have money to play for the huge game,but the rich eligible to play more often with the holding money after the loss.If the poor gamblers had 50$,he will do gambling for the 10-20$.If the rich gamblers had 1000$,he can able to play the game with all the holding 1000$.Because the rich gamblers will generate money from regular business.

The Rich gamblers if they should risk the same percentage some poor risk on gambling, I'm very sure a few of the rich gamblers may go bankrupt Sooner than they can imagine, but because this poor gamblers some times are just desperate and want to just make money gambling, they do not even consider this that much they just keep gambling till they finally exhaust their bankroll then they return to the casino the next day on a new bankroll, both rich and poor should always try to make sure they don't risk more than they can afford to lose so they can be on the safe side of gambling.

The rich gambler will become a poor if they keep on doing the gambling with random betting.The rich gamblers had a advantage of recovering the loss from the balance money in the wallet.But the poor gamblers will keep look for the next game and sometimes they took loan for next gambling game.

[redsun114]

In my opinion, this is not at all different between rich people and poor people because the risks are basically the same. Even though rich people will remain calm and will not experience difficulties when they lose at gambling, poor people will definitely have difficulties and can even immediately experience difficulties when they lose at gambling. So I think that's the small difference between a rich person and a poor person who loses a gambling bet at the same place.

But don't you think weather remaining calm either as a poor or rich person is a product of how much such individual gambled it, because you just can't expect a rich man who earns $1000 monthly and gambled $10 on a bet and lost it to worry, unlike a poor man who earns $50 monthly and then went and gamble same $10 not to be madly worry about his lose, because just as $10 is 1% of $1000, if the same poor man gambles same 1% of his income, which is $0.5 and lost it.. Do you think such poor man will be angry?

That's right, it depends on the financial capability of a person and how much money they've lost based on their status whether they will be calm or worried. A person who earns $200k a year would barely care if they lost $10k in gambling throughout the year, however, if someone earns $10k a year, they would be mad, worried, and sad if they lose $500 in gambling because they can't afford to lose a lot of money since their income isn't very high.

This is why, one needs to make sure that they aren't spending more money than they can afford to lose on their gambling activities just to create problems in their life. Who would want to create unnecessary problems in their life when there are already so many things to cause problems?

[maydna]

Some times the difference is the fact that the poor doesn't have that much to risk and that's why it would want to look like that which the poor is risking is small but is we should look at it by the percentage of their worth it may turn out that the poor are even risking more because since their funds is small, a percentage of it could mean their betting bankroll.

The money was the difference between the rich and poor gamblers.The poor don’t have money to play for the huge game,but the rich eligible to play more often with the holding money after the loss.If the poor gamblers had 50$,he will do gambling for the 10-20$.If the rich gamblers had 1000$,he can able to play the game with all the holding 1000$.Because the rich gamblers will generate money from regular business.

Indeed, poor gamblers do not have as much money as rich gamblers, but many poor gamblers continue their gambling games because they think that gambling is a way to change their lives for the better by winning their gambling games. Many of them are pinning their hopes on gambling games, including those who are used to gambling and want to win big. Perhaps they can only bet with small money, but they will continue to do so when they have money because there is still a desire to get big wins from gambling. Poor gamblers don't think about the risks they will face from gambling because they only think about how to get their big win. And that is why perhaps we still see many poor gamblers who often gamble without even trying to reduce their gambling activities.

[Lucasgabd]

does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?

what the poor gambler should do is quit gambling and prioritize what's important. gambling is not a priority, making a fortune from gambling is going to happen to everyone and more often than not you will end up losing rather than winning, If you do win, it is not a guarantee that it is life-changing.

For someone to be rich, the person must have achieved so many things of life that he ought to have achieved and when you talk about taking financial risk, I expect the rich to take more risk than the poor man because even if he loses, the rich will better manage the consequences of the their losses than the poor. In gambling, a poor man isn't supposed to take huge risks in his gambling activities in other not to remain poor all his life because the more he losses his money, the more he'll try to get it back by gambling more which might likely make him become a gambling addict.

not really
sometimes you're rich because you're born rich and you had to do nothing for that, but your ancestors did
that's why the game is not getting rich but remaining rich
each person starts in a different moment and a different situation in the playing field
you can get a lot of money but it takes intelligence and discipline to keep it.

[shasan]

What is the main reason you say poor people take higher risks than rich people? In fact, they are at the same risk of bankruptcy, if in games rich people tend to use big bets and poor people tend to use small bets, so what differentiates them?
For me, they only differ nominally when gambling

People should only bet those amounts which a person can afford to lose. In this case, those who are rich might have more funds to afford to lose than poor people. So, in general, it might not be wrong if we say that rich people can bet higher than poor people.

[Westinhome]

Indeed, poor gamblers do not have as much money as rich gamblers, but many poor gamblers continue their gambling games because they think that gambling is a way to change their lives for the better by winning their gambling games. Many of them are pinning their hopes on gambling games, including those who are used to gambling and want to win big. Perhaps they can only bet with small money, but they will continue to do so when they have money because there is still a desire to get big wins from gambling. Poor gamblers don't think about the risks they will face from gambling because they only think about how to get their big win. And that is why perhaps we still see many poor gamblers who often gamble without even trying to reduce their gambling activities.

The rich gamblers are the person who play the gambling for the entertainment,most of the rich gamblers had their own money from the regular sources like business.So they choose the gambling for the entertainment,the emotional decision doesn’t have any role in the game.Because they won’t hurry up to the game winnings,So they won’t take any risk in the gambling site.The rich gamblers can easily get the knowledge about the gambling games using their money,but the each dollars was important to the poor gamblers.So they never take any money risk in the gambling site,when that money was most important one for them in other purposes.