An open letter to Eddie from Stake with lots of shares on Reddit

[Potato Chips]

Sadly, it doesn't look like public archives has the 'deleted letter' that's readable or if there's anyone who knows better who would like to continue the dig?

First off, nothing on the typical places like wayback machine and archive.today -- tried with both old and new reddit

The pre-deleted post was on unddit but the letter was on an image so it doesn't count again lols, see: https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/gambling/comments/1b51kyk/dear_eddie_and_stake/

The closest I could find was this misplaced and extremely streched out image from google lol, https://images.app.goo.gl/X47iNFW3zMJSdckHA -- cmiiw tho, but the date + the blurry "dear eddie" sorta matches  

[1714683413]

1714683413

[Get-Paid.com]

Guys,

Apologies for not uploading the letter, next time in the future would remember to include it here in the forum.
Once again apologies.

[EarnOnVictor]

I may likely deviate also from the open water is where the writer mentioned gambling as a tool for terrorism, this is quite confusing a bit for me

The writer was using a sort of a metaphor.
Terrorists kill people and destroy things.
He was implying Eddie supposedly is killing an entire generation by getting them addicted.
Hope it makes sense now.

I was curious to know the content of the post when I found out that it had been deleted for a reason best known to the writer, but upon since this post of yours, I think I am able to know the gist there.

Well, it is not today that people are talking about gambling or calling out a well-known name in the industry. It could be either good or bad side of it, but one thing that is important here is that no one was forced to gamble, and that is why the government and the law of every land ensure that you are an adult before you gamble so that you are not making decisions as a child. We've seen cases of a teenager ascended the throne of his forefathers and ruled rightly from then till he grew old. This means that it is all about wisdom and choices and once you have it rightly as an adult, you will be able to choose smartly and wisely.

In gambling, you can either win or lose, and don't forget that someone pays for your winnings from their pocket, so why won't you pay for your losses from your pocket? It is such a system that is fairly planned especially if you are gambling with a fair casino. This is why you must first locate such fairness first, and if they fairly treat you but you merely lose due to your poor decision and portfolio handling, then it is your own "cup of tee" and not the other party's issue that is fair to you and even willing to give you your winning if you won.

And for the addiction, is it the casinos that made them addicted or their foolishness and their inability to be disciplined and ensure self-control? I think those who are abusing casinos or calling out big names are just insincere. Casinos have been for so long and will continue to be, and so far they do not force you to gamble, it is your headache to gamble. Instead of them to blend their greed and frustration, they continue blaming casinos, which is awkward in my opinion.

[bettercrypto]

...
The writer was using a sort of a metaphor.
Terrorists kill people and destroy things.
He was implying Eddie supposedly is killing an entire generation by getting them addicted.
Hope it makes sense now.

If the casino is a success it means a lot of people have lost money there, but it doesn't mean that 100% of the users lose. Some of them have good days and walk away from the casino with profit. But this open letter will not change anything, is like writing an open letter to NATO telling them how people are dying daily due to the wars they are supporting.

We need to understand the world already works in one way, and if we don't like it we only can change our actions, but it's on each individual to take this decision.

It is true that you said this: a casino will not be successful if there are only a few gamblers who lose in it, or if the gamblers make a lot of money but eventually lose in the casino. Although there are also winners, there are only a few compared to the losers, who can hardly be counted in a day.

Also, the stakes casino is a well-known casino worldwide online. I see the stakes casino logo often when there are major events in boxing, which means the stakes community is really big, to be honest.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

It is true that you said this: a casino will not be successful if there are only a few gamblers who lose in it, or if the gamblers make a lot of money but eventually lose in the casino. Although there are also winners, there are only a few compared to the losers, who can hardly be counted in a day.

Also, the stakes casino is a well-known casino worldwide online. I see the stakes casino logo often when there are major events in boxing, which means the stakes community is really big, to be honest.

Well, Stake is really a very popular brand when it come to online gambling casinos, but we all must understand and respect the sacrifices they made and the prices they paid to get to where they are today, there is no single online gambling casino where gamblers don't lose or win, why is it that Stake still is the biggest casino amongst all?

Like I indirectly touched before, all casinos are designed the same way, which is, they have more chances of making money than the player, we all should remember that casinos are providing a service to gamblers, and as such, they should get paid for the service they are rendering, and it doesn't matter how many players on that casino are winning or losing, or how much they are winning or losing, there are some games that casinos don't even participate in the payment of user's winnings, or taking of user's loses, because they are just there as a gateway way for the gamblers to the main providers of the game, what the casino do is take their commission from every players winning or loses, and for games like this, casinos keep making money regardless of whether a gambler is winning or losing.

So, in the nutshell, Stake didn't become the best out of luck, they spent their time and money on alot of sacrifices they made, and the prices they paid to get to where they are, any casino can become big if they can make the same sacrifice and pay the price that follows.

[decodx]

It is true that you said this: a casino will not be successful if there are only a few gamblers who lose in it, or if the gamblers make a lot of money but eventually lose in the casino. Although there are also winners, there are only a few compared to the losers, who can hardly be counted in a day.

I gotta disagree with you there!  Casinos need a revolving door of winners and losers (keeps the game exciting!).  Think about it, big winners are basically human billboards, right?  Someone scores big, and everyone else jumps in to try their shot.  No big wins, no excitement. Casinos must have some winners, even if it means they gotta cough up some cash sometimes